A Project-Oriented Biochemistry Laboratory Course - Journal of

Aug 1, 1999 - A project-oriented laboratory course has been designed to introduce students to the ... Journal of Chemical Education 2016 93 (6), 1108-...
0 downloads 0 Views 111KB Size
In the Laboratory

A Project-Oriented Biochemistry Laboratory Course Paul A. Craig Department of Chemistry, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623; [email protected]

A biochemistry major was recently established at the Rochester Institute of Technology. To complete the undergraduate experience of the biochemistry majors, we needed an effective laboratory course in which students are exposed to modern techniques and analytical thinking in the design of experiments. For the past four years we have offered a course, “Biochemistry: Experimental Techniques Laboratory”, which has been taken by students from the biology, biotechnology, biochemistry, chemistry, and clinical chemistry programs at RIT. This course involves mainly protein chemistry, because excellent courses in molecular biology and genetic engineering are available in the Department of Biology. The course as first offered used experiments from a variety of laboratory manuals and the chemical education literature. This was inadequate for two reasons: (i) the experiments were designed separately and did not relate directly to each other, and (ii) only about half of the experiments worked. Therefore, before the course was offered a second time, the curriculum was modified to revolve around a single project: the purification, characterization, and molecular biology of threonine dehydrogenase (TDH) from Escherichia coli (1). This enzyme initiates one of three known pathways for threonine degradation and is found in many prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Administration of threonine has been shown to relieve some of the muscular rigidity in persons suffering from multiple sclerosis, suggesting that products of the pathway initiated by TDH have a role in neurochemical pathways in the body (2–5). Recently, tdh, the gene encoding TDH, has been identified and sequenced in the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris (6, 7 ). The integrated laboratory approach shares many features with other biochemistry laboratory programs that have been described in the literature:

is that after the students have mastered a series of techniques, we actually undertake an original research project as a class using those techniques; the students are studying something that is brand new to them and to their instructor.

All the experiments are focused on the purification and characterization of a single enzyme or protein (8–10).

Central Course Project The focus of the course is threonine dehydrogenase, an enzyme from E. coli that I studied in graduate school (1). The pathway initiated by threonine dehydrogenase is shown in Figure 1. The course schedule, specific techniques, and instrumentation for each part of the course are listed in Table 2. The course is divided into four parts: enzyme purification, enzyme characterization, molecular biology, and an original project. Several factors make TDH an excellent choice for the course:

The experiments are integrated so that each builds on the previous one (11–14). The course incorporates the use of computers for data analysis and database searching (11, 13).

Several groups have advocated a project-oriented or research-based approach to their biochemistry laboratory course, including features such as preparation of grant proposals (11) and “research-like” independence to get away from “cookbook” laboratory approaches (8, 15–18). A search of the NSF awards at the Fastlane Web site (http://www.nsf.gov/verity/srchawd.htm) for integrated project-oriented biochemistry laboratories retrieved more than 80 funded projects, several of which are listed in Table 1. One of the unique features of our approach

1130

Implementation The course meets for seven hours per week throughout our 10-week quarter. Formally there is one hour of lecture and two 3-hour lab periods. In practice, lecture is interspersed with the lab experience when a new technique is introduced. Our average course enrollment has been 8 students; we anticipate an increase to 12 students per year as the number of biochemistry major increases. Our course goals are to Teach fundamental biochemistry techniques, Apply a quantitative analytical approach, Introduce computer visualization and database skills, and Include one original project.

All course documentation is available from the campus Web site (http://www.rit.edu/~pac8612/505/). Students are divided into teams of two or three, which work together throughout the quarter. To complete the labs during the assigned periods the team members must identify and assign tasks, such as preparing buffers for chromatography or reagents for enzyme assays. Students are graded on lab participation, notebook, and a total of seven lab reports. Five short lab reports (with introduction, results, discussion and references) are submitted and graded on an individual basis. Formal reports (abstract, introduction, materials, methods, results, discussion and references) are required for the enzyme purification and original research project labs. Each team submits one formal report for each of these two lab exercises and all team members receive the same grade.

Growth of the cells that express the enzyme is simple and rapid. Purification of the enzyme is straightforward and reliable. The TDH gene has been cloned into a plasmid based on the vector pBR322 (19), facilitating studies on the gene sequence and expression.

Journal of Chemical Education • Vol. 76 No. 8 August 1999 • JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu

In the Laboratory Table 1. Project-Oriented Biochemistry Laboratory Proposals Funded by NSF No.

Title

8951782

Modular Approach to Undergraduate Biochemistry Laboratory Instruction

9151155

Development of Undergraduate Biochemical Engineering Laboratory at Tri-State University

9152722

Integrated Undergraduate Laboratories for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

9250473

A Revitalized Undergraduate Biochemistry Laboratory Experience

9351350

Development of a Project Based Laboratory Sequence in Molecular Biology and Chemistry

9451580

Establishment of a Cellular and Molecular Biochemistry Laboratory for Undergraduate Teaching and Research

9452118

Equipment to Implement a New Undergraduate Biochemistry Laboratory Curriculum

9550975

Crossing Boundaries—A Bioorganic Approach to Chemistry at Pomona College

9602356

Modular Approach to Biotechnology Laboratory Instruction Based on a Novel Green-Fluorescent Protein

9650095

Development of a Biochemistry Laboratory Using Physiologically Relevant Samples

9651351

Purification and Characterization of Luciferase in the Undergraduate Laboratory

9750956

A Project-Oriented Undergraduate Laboratory Course in Cell Biology

9751332

A Research-Oriented, Evolution-Based Biochemistry Laboratory

9751664

Cytochrome c: A Biochemistry Laboratory

9752329

Development of an Undergraduate Biochemistry Project Laboratory

Course Schedule

Week 1: Activity and Protein Assays ( 20) Before beginning the purification of the enzyme, the students first learn how to find it in a cell-free extract. Protein concentrations are determined using the Bradford protein assay (21) and two different activity assays: (i) rate of NADH formation followed by ∆A340 on a UV–vis spectrophotometer (22) and (ii) a colorimetric microplate assay for rapid detection of TDH activity eluting from a chromatography column. To facilitate the development of a quantitative approach to biochemistry, students are required to analyze the Bradford assay data in a spreadsheet format, using a template from an analytical chemistry textbook (23).

Figure 1. L -Threonine catabolic pathway initiated by threonine dehydrogenase. The pathway begins with the NAD-dependent oxidation of threonine by TDH, which is coupled to a ligation reaction to form acetyl CoA plus glycine in the cell. This figure includes the electron transfer reagents used to develop the colorimetric assay described below.

Weeks 2 & 3. Enzyme Purification ( 24) The enzyme source for this project is a strain of E. coli that has a plasmid, pDR121 (19), which contains the gene for TDH. The presence of the plasmid makes this strain an overproducer of the enzyme. During the first week students prepare media, grow the cells, and prepare a cell-free extract by sonication. The cell-free extract is recovered by centrifugation in a superspeed centrifuge. This is followed by anion exchange chromatography, in which students use a Waters 650E protein chromatography system equipped with POROS DEAE columns. The use of three protein chromatography workstations enables students to (a) optimize stationary phase and mobile phase conditions in the ion exchange step during one lab period, then (b) scale up and complete the anion chromatography step during the subsequent lab period. Before performing the ion exchange chromatography step, students are encouraged to explore ion exchange chromatography using Ionex, a simulation of ion exchange chromatography developed at RIT for the Windows environment (25). The simulation allows them to examine the effects of salt concentration, pH, and protein load on the separation process. The dye–ligand chromatography step is still done by gravity feed chromatography, but it is very straightforward and can be completed in one or two lab periods. Similar purification procedures for dehydrogenases have been described previously for undergraduate biochemistry lab courses (26, 27). Students then perform protein and activity assays and construct a protein purification table. Of the experiments in the course, the enzyme purification step is the only one that

Table 2. Instrumentation and Techniques in the Biochemistry Lab Course Week Experiment

Instrumentation

Techniques

UV–vis spectrophotometer Microplate reader

Enzyme activity assay Bradford protein assay

Superspeed centrifuge Protein chromatography system

Ion exchange chromatography Affinity chromatography

Protein electrophoresis apparatus

SDS–PAGE

UV–vis spectrophotometer Microplate reader

Enzyme activity assays using two substrates

Expression & Sequencing

Thermal cycler Microfuge Horizontal electrophoresis Automated DNA sequencer

Sterile technique Plasmid isolation Electrophoresis of DNA

7–9

Independent Project

Combination of all the above

Depends on student design

10

Sequence Homology

Computer network with Internet access

Database searching Structure prediction tools

1

Activity Assays

2, 3 Purification 4a

Electrophoresis

4b, 5 Enzyme Kinetics 6

JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu • Vol. 76 No. 8 August 1999 • Journal of Chemical Education

1131

In the Laboratory

regularly exceeds scheduled class time. This generally does not pose a problem because the students work in teams and there is less time pressure from exams early in the quarter.

Week 4a. Electrophoresis ( 28 ) Aliquots from the various stages of purification are analyzed by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS– PAGE) for purity and to estimate the subunit molecular weight. In preparation for this experiment, students unfamiliar with electrophoresis are encouraged to visit a Web-based simulation of electrophoresis of protein and DNA (29) (http://www.rit. edu/~pac8612/electro/E_Sim.html ). In addition to showing the effect of voltage and protein molecular weight on migration patterns, it also demonstrates the use of SDS–PAGE to estimate molecular weight. Please note that this simulation is a JAVA applet that works best with Netscape 3.0. Weeks 4b, 5. Enzyme Kinetics ( 30 ) Using their purified enzymes, teams of two or three students prepare a series of assay solutions and determine Km and Vmax values for TDH. This is perhaps the most difficult experiment, since we are analyzing a two-substrate, twoproduct reaction. Even with the Km values for both substrates to assist them in selecting substrate concentrations, students have a difficult time obtaining reliable kinetic data. Despite the difficulties, I like this experiment because it forces the students to improve their pipetting technique in the lab and their quantitative analysis skills during report preparation. Week 6. Gene Expression and Sequencing ( 31) Students isolate the pDR121 plasmid from a small liquid culture of E. coli cells, using a commercially available kit that employs alkaline lysis followed by a chromatography step (5 Prime 3 Prime, Boulder, CO). Plasmid isolation is done with a commercial kit rather than a traditional mini-prep to insure the success of the DNA sequencing portion of this experiment, based on the recommendation of the manufacturer of the DNA sequencing system (32). The isolated plasmid is then used to transform E. coli cells that lack a functional tdh gene. Successful transformants are identified by their ability to grow on L-threonine as sole carbon source and to grow in the presence of ampicillin. The plasmid is also used for cycle sequencing of tdh using the ABI PRISM dye terminator sequencing protocol (Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Students learn about the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by performing the sequencing reactions: they set up the sequencing reactions (primer, dNTP’s, ddNTP’s, Taq polymerase, buffers, Mg2+), which are done with our thermal cycler. The product mixtures are submitted to the nucleic acid core laboratory of a local research university, where the PCR extension products are analyzed. Students then evaluate the resulting DNA sequences using the BLAST server (33). Weeks 7–9. Original Research Project Each year a simple, well-defined research project that relates directly to threonine dehydrogenase is included in the class. The projects are designed so students have to apply techniques and principles that they learned in the first six weeks of the course. This really is a great adventure for the class, since the outcome is unknown. The original project portion of the lab is described in more detail below.

1132

Week 10. Sequence Homology ( 34) This exercise focuses on the use of information available in the primary literature and the Internet to design an experiment in site-directed mutagenesis of the tdh gene from E. coli. Students begin by submitting the known sequence of the gene to the BLAST (35) server at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (33). Each student then prepares a list of ten proteins from the BLAST search to study in greater depth. They use additional resources on the Internet, including SwissProt (36 ) and the Protein Data Bank (37), focusing on proteins with a known three-dimensional structure or well-characterized metal-ion binding sites. With these data in hand, they search MEDLINE for references on any of the proteins they have found. They are required to find links to the primary literature throughout the exercise. The goals of this exercise is for students to learn how to collect and sort information in designing an experiment. Safety The experiments in this course do not require any unusual safety precautions. Throughout the course students are required to wear goggles. Gloves are required during procedures using hazardous chemicals such as ethidium bromide or acids and bases, or when working with bacterial cultures. Prepoured polyacrylamide gels are used for protein electrophoresis to avoid exposing students to the neurotoxic effects of the acrylamide monomer. All growth media are sterilized before disposal. To minimize waste production, ethidium bromide (for DNA gels) and Coomassie blue (for protein gels) are used repeatedly. Original Research Projects I select one original project for the course each year based on techniques the students have used during the course. The project is described in very general terms and the student teams then develop a strategy for attacking the problem. For example, the original project this year is to purify the threonine dehydrogenase from Klebsiella pneumoniae. The students will select the type and sequence of purification steps to use, as well as the characterization procedures. They have access to all equipment and reagents in the lab and to anything they can borrow from other labs in the building. Three years’ experience with this approach have revealed several factors that are key to success in executing these projects: 1. The project must be very narrowly defined. If students are asked to think creatively on an original project, it should be built on things they have already done and there should be one or two obvious paths to take to solve the problem. Otherwise the students can become confused, sidetracked or frustrated. 2. The project should be in an area where the instructor is highly qualified. 3. Six 3-hour lab sessions are set aside for the project. The project should have built-in assessment points whereby the students can easily evaluate their progress at the end of each lab period and, if necessary, adjust their focus or their goals. 4. The project should be integrated into the overall direction of the course. Students must be able to understand how this project relates to their earlier experiments and how it will contribute to future developments in the course.

Journal of Chemical Education • Vol. 76 No. 8 August 1999 • JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu

In the Laboratory

Three different projects have been attempted in the past three years: isolation of the tdh gene from Salmonella typhimurium, site-directed mutagenesis of the E. coli enzyme, and development of a colorimetric assay for the enzyme. The first two experiments were narrowly defined and fit nicely into the overall context of the course (criteria 1 and 4). However, they were unsuccessful because they did not meet the criteria 2 and 3. The third project involved developing a rapid colorimetric assay for TDH activity. This was in my area of expertise—analytical biochemistry—and it was a very successful experience for the students.

Rapid Colorimetric Assay for TDH Threonine dehydrogenase from E. coli catalyzes the NADdependent oxidation of threonine to form 2-amino-3ketobutyrate and NADH (Fig. 1). To date the activity of this enzyme has been followed spectrophotometrically (based on the 340 nm absorbance of NADH) or colorimetrically (based on the formation of aminoacetone) (38). Both assays are quantitative and specific for TDH, but they are also quite time consuming, requiring more than 5 minutes per assay. This is particularly cumbersome when analyzing the 80 fractions collected during chromatographic purification of the enzyme. A colorimetric stain based on nitro blue tetrazolium has been used to detect TDH activity bands in electrophoresis gels (22). Similarly, a stain based on another tetrazolium dye, p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet, has been used to identify bacterial colonies expressing TDH activity on agar plates (19). On the basis of these references, the students developed a colorimetric assay for TDH activity. In the assay electrons are transferred from NADH (which is transparent in the visible range) to p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (ITV) using phenazine methosulfate (PMS) as an electron-transfer catalyst. The resulting formazan dye absorbs at 497 nm with an extinction coefficient of 19,000 M{1cm{1 (39). To begin the project, the students demonstrated that the rate of color development in the assay was linear, proportional to enzyme concentration and specific for TDH, using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Fig. 2). The assay was performed with a crude extract of E. coli containing TDH to see if other enzymes present in the crude extract contributed to color development. The rate of color development in the absence of L-threonine was equivalent to the spontaneous rate of color development in the absence of enzyme, indicating that this assay is specific for TDH. The students subsequently obtained similar results using a microplate reader (Fig. 3). The rapid assay was then used to evaluate separations under a variety of pH conditions on a chromatographic column. One separation is illustrated in Figure 4. The ITV colorimetric assay for THD is specific and the rate of spontaneous color development is low enough that enzyme activity can be detected in dilute solutions. This rapid colorimetric assay has subsequently been used extensively by students in the laboratory course to locate TDH as it elutes from a variety of chromatography columns. Future Plans This course is designed to develop over time to include new technologies that become available in our department. Rather than developing the new experiments by myself, it is

Time /s

TDH /µL

Figure 2. The colorimetric reaction by UV–vis spectrophotometry. Assays were performed with increasing volumes of a 1:100 dilution of a crude extract of E. coli containing TDH activity. (♦) Control with 20 µL of crude extract but no threonine. Complete assay with (––) 0 µL; ( • • •) 2.5 µL; (- - -) 5 µL; (- . - . ) 7.5 µL; (– – –) 10 µL; (– . – .) 15 µL; and (– . . – . .) 20 µL of crude extract. Assays were done at 37 °C on an HP Model 8453 UV–vis spectrophotometer, using 125 µmol of L-threonine, 5 µmol NAD+, 200 µmol of Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 5 µg/mL of PMS, and 200 nmol of ITV. The rates in the right panel reflect the slope of the first four minutes of the reaction traces in the left panel.

my plan to do some preliminary investigation, then have the students actually develop new experiments as the original research portion of the course. Additional course modules will be designed to take full advantage of several instruments the department has obtained through NSF-ILI grant support (DUE-9650559, DUE-9551406): protein chromatography stations, capillary electrophoresis, and NMR.

Protein Chromatography Stations With the analytical methods in place to identify and isolate TDH from E. coli, the original project for this year is to isolate TDH from another species, K. pneumoniae, using gel filtration, ion exchange and dye–ligand chromatography. We have already completed preliminary studies in our research group to demonstrate that TDH is expressed at detectable levels in this organism. Peptide Mapping of E. coli TDH Using Capillary Electrophoresis The purified enzyme from E. coli will be reduced and alkylated, then digested with trypsin and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis (40). The photo diode array detector in this system will enable the students to identify tryptic peptides containing aromatic residues. SDS–PAGE Using Capillary Electrophoresis To supplement their understanding of electrophoresis and to expose them to more modern technology, I will have the students analyze their purified enzyme samples using a Hewlett-Packard 3D Capillary Electrophoresis System to obtain a second estimate of molecular weight and a quantitative estimate of the purity of their protein (41). NMR of Unstable Reaction Intermediates The initial product of the reaction catalyzed by TDH is an unstable intermediate, 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate (AKB; Fig. 1). Using our 300 MHz NMR, students will follow the appearance of AKB and aminoacetone.

JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu • Vol. 76 No. 8 August 1999 • Journal of Chemical Education

1133

In the Laboratory during the course.

Figure 3. The colorimetric reaction in a microplate format. This assay was performed at room temperature on a Dynatech MR600 microplate reader, using 25 µmol of L-threonine, 1 µmol of NAD+, 40 µmol of Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 1 µg/mL of PMS, 40 nmol of ITV, and the following volumes of a 1:100 dilution of a crude extract of E. coli containing TDH in a total volume of 200 µL: ( –– ) 0 µL; (• • •)2.5 mL; 5 µL ( ); (- - -) 7.5 µL; (- . - .) 10 µL; (– . – .)15 µL; and (– . . – . .) 20 µL. The rates in the right panel reflect the slope of the first four minutes of the reaction traces in the left panel. The curve is a linear least-squares regression fit. j j

j

Selection of the system to study is critical. It is most helpful if the protein is easily purified and stable for several months at 4 °C and if the gene for the protein is available on a plasmid. While it is recommended that instructors design a similar course around a single system with which they are quite familiar, the pDR121 plasmid is available upon request. The course handouts can be found at this URL: http://www. rit.edu/~pac8612/505/. At RIT, the course meets twice per week for 10 weeks (20 sessions). A few significant adjustments would be required to adapt this approach for a one-semester laboratory course meeting four hours per week for 14 weeks (14 sessions). It would be necessary to eliminate two of the exercises. For example, for students who are required to take a separate molecular biology laboratory course as biochemistry majors, removal of the gene expression–sequencing lab and the sequence homology labs would reduce the course by four lab sessions. The enzyme purification session (which requires four lab periods in our approach) could be reduced to two periods by limiting the purification to a single chromatography step and having the students work with the partially purified enzyme, or by providing the students with a partially purified enzyme at the beginning of the course so they can purify it with one further chromatography step. Acknowledgments I would like to thank all the students who participated in the development of this course. The following students obtained the data shown in Figures 2 through 4 during the 1995–96 academic year: David Anderson, Liesel Baker, Allen Chiu, George Compitello, and Mark Galvin. Support for development of this course was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF-ILI DUE-9650559) and by the Rochester Institute of Technology. Literature Cited

Figure 4. Use of the colorimetric assay with rapid purification methods. TDH was partially purified from a crude extract of E. coli on a POROS DEAE column using a ConSep LC100 chromatography system. Protein elution (A 280) is indicated by the dotted line and TDH activity (∆A 490 in 5 min) is indicated by the solid line.

Summary In this course, students learn techniques expected after completion of a biochemistry lab course. Teamwork and creative problem-solving skills are developed throughout the course and especially during work on the original projects. This approach can be applied successfully in undergraduate labs elsewhere. It is necessary to Identify a suitable central topic from your research; Select techniques you wish to include; Design a series of experiments that use these techniques; and Carefully define a new research project that integrates techniques and approaches that have been introduced 1134

1. Craig, P. A.; Dekker, E. E. Biochemistry 1986, 25, 1870–1876. 2. Lee, A.; Patterson, V. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1993, 88, 334–338. 3. Hauser, S. L.; Doolittle, T. H.; Lopez-Bresnahan, M.; Shahani, B.; Schoenfeld, D.; Shih, V. E.; Growdon, J.; Lehrich, J. R. Arch. Neurol. 1992, 49, 923–926. 4. Growdon, J. H.; Nader, T. M.; Schoenfeld, J.; Wurtman, R. J. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 1991, 14, 403–412. 5. Barbeau, A.; Roy, M.; Chouza, C. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1982, 9, 141–145. 6. Weng, S. F.; Liu, Y. S.; Lin, J. W.; Tseng, Y. H. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 240, 523–529. 7. Liu, Y. S.; Tseng, Y. H.; Lin, J. W.; Weng, S. F. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 235, 300–305. 8. Deal, S. T.; Hurst, M. O. J. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 241–242. 9. Markwell, J. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 1018–1019. 10. Slabaugh, M. R.; Carrasco, C. R. J. Chem. Educ. 1975, 52, 67. 11. Wolfson, A. J.; Hall, M. L.; Branham, T. R. J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 1026. 12. Wilson, W. D.; Davidson, M. W. J. Chem. Educ. 1979, 56, 204– 206. 13. Harman, J. G.; Anderson, J. A.; Nakashima, R. A.; Shaw, R. W. J. Chem. Educ. 1995, 72, 641–645. 14. Bonser, A. M.; Moe, O. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 794–797. 15. Adamson, I. J. Chem. Educ. 1980, 57, 180.

Journal of Chemical Education • Vol. 76 No. 8 August 1999 • JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu

In the Laboratory 16. Chakravarthy, M.; Snyder, L.; Vanyo, T.; Holbrook, J.; Jakubowski, H. V. J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 268–272. 17. Hurlbut, J. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1975, 52, 741. 18. Dreisbach, J. H. J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 1068–1069. 19. Ravnikar, P. D.; Somerville, R. L. J. Bacteriol. 1987, 169, 4716– 4721. 20. Craig, P. A. Quantifying Enzymes: Protein & Activity Assays; http:// www.rit.edu/~pac8612/505/activity.htm (accessed Apr 1999). 21. Bradford, M. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. 22. Boylan, S. A.; Dekker, E. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 1809–1815. 23. Harris, D. C. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 4th ed.; Freeman: New York, 1995; pp 71–82. 24. Craig, P. A. Purification and Characterization of Threonine Dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli; http://www.rit.edu/~pac8612/505/ tdhpurif.htm (accessed Apr 1999). 25. Cotton, K.; Craig, P. A. J. Chem. Educ. Software, submitted. 26. Farrell, S. O.; Choo, D. J. Chem. Educ. 1989, 66, 692–693. 27. Morgan, C.; Moir, N. J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 1040–1041. 28. Craig, P. A. Protein Electrophoresis; http://www.rit.edu/~pac8612/ 505/tdhelec.htm (accessed Apr 1999). 29. Craig, P. A.; Mix, D. FASEB J. 1997, 11, A842. 30. Craig, P. A. Enzyme Kinetics with Threonine Dehydrogenase from E. coli; http://www.rit.edu/~pac8612/505/tdhkin.htm (accessed Apr 1999). 31. Craig, P. A. Expression of the Gene for Threonine Dehydrogenase in E. coli; http://www.rit.edu/~pac8612/505/tdhexp.htm (accessed Apr 1999). 32. ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit Protocol P/N 402078, Revision A; Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems: Foster City, CA, 1995. 33. Madden, T.; Shavirin, S. B.; Epstein, J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; National Center for Biotechnology Information; http:/ /www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/ (accessed Apr 1999). 34. Craig, P. A. Protein Sequence Comparison: Analysis of TDH; http:// www.rit.edu/~pac8612/505/seqcomp.htm (accessed Apr 1999). 35. Altschul, S. F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E. W.; Lipman, D. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. 36. SWISS-PROT Annotated Protein Sequence Database; http:// www.expasy.ch/sprot/sprot-top.html (accessed Apr 1999). 37. Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics. Protein Data Bank; http://www.rcsb.org/; (formerly Brookhaven National Laboratory. Protein Data Bank; http://www.pdb.bnl.gov/. 38. Boylan, S. A.; Dekker, E. E. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1978, 85, 190–197. 39. Gella, F. J.; Olivella, M. T.; Pegueroles, F.; Gener, J. Clin. Chem. 1981, 27, 1686–1689. 40. Ross, G. A.; Lorkin, P.; Perrett, D. J. Chromatogr. 1993, 636, 69–79. 41. Cohen, A. S.; Karger, B. L. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 397, 409–417.

JChemEd.chem.wisc.edu • Vol. 76 No. 8 August 1999 • Journal of Chemical Education

1135