A Series of 6-(ω-Methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-N ... - ACS Publications

Apr 21, 1998 - A Series of 6-(ω-Methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-N-methyl- 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines: Cysteine-Reactive Molecular Yardsticks for Pr...
0 downloads 0 Views 92KB Size
358

Bioconjugate Chem. 1998, 9, 358−364

A Series of 6-(ω-Methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines: Cysteine-Reactive Molecular Yardsticks for Probing r2-Adrenergic Receptors Petri Heinonen,*,† Katja Koskua,† Marjo Pihlavisto,‡ Anne Marjama¨ki,‡ Victor Cockcroft,*,§ Juha-Matti Savola,§ Mika Scheinin,‡ and Harri Lo¨nnberg† Department of Chemistry, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Turku, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland, and Juvantia Pharma, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. Received October 28, 1997; Revised Manuscript Received February 18, 1998

A series of 6-(ω-methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines (7a-d) was prepared and characterized as SH-reactive molecular yardsticks useful in probing R2-adrenergic receptors. Rapid displacement of the methanesulfonyl group by a cysteine residue in dilute aqueous solution with concomitant formation of a disulfide conjugate was verified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of the reaction of 7a with a cysteine-containing decapeptide. 7a-d all showed a marked affinity for the three different variants of human R2-adrenergic receptors: HR2Awt, HR2Bwt, and mutant HR2ASer201Cys197. However, only the mutated receptor (HR2ASer201Cys197) was irreversibly inactivated, and the extent of inactivation in this case was linearly dependent on the length of the side chain of 7a-d. These results show that the molecular yardstick approach tested here can provide useful information for modeling receptor proteins.

INTRODUCTION

The R2-adrenergic receptors, for which there are three distinct subtypes in humans (R2A, R2B, and R2C) (1-3), mediate many of the physiological and pharmacological effects of norepinephrine and epinephrine. As typical G-protein-coupled receptors, each consists of a single polypeptide chain spanning the cell membrane seven times with three intra- and three extracellular loops (4). The seven transmembrane segments are believed to be conserved R-helical elements forming the binding site for not only the endogenous transmitters but also small molecule analogues, such as oxymetazoline, chlorpromazine, UK 14,304, dexmedetomidene, and alkylated tetrahydroisoquinolines. All these compounds show a different pattern of subtype selectivity, and hence different pharmacological actions (5, 6). Elucidation of the structural details of the binding domain of receptor proteins can facilitate the development of new therapeutic agents, exhibiting improved selectivity. However, primarily because of their membrane protein nature, direct structural studies (e.g., X-ray crystallography or NMR) on these receptors have so far not yielded high-resolution data despite considerable efforts. In attempts to obtain experimental information on receptor structure, mutagenesis studies in combination with pharmacological characterization have been popular, with over 200 literature references in the area * Address correspondence to either author. Petri Heinonen, Department of Chemistry, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland. Telephone: +358-2-333 8092. Fax: +358-2333 6700. E-mail: [email protected]. Victor Cockcroft, Drug Design & Bioinformatics, Juvantia Pharma, Tykisto¨katu 6 A, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. Telephone or fax: +358-2-2327763. † Department of Chemistry, University of Turku. ‡ Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Turku. § Juvantia Pharma.

of G-protein-coupled receptors. However, these studies suffer from the limitation that noncovalent interactions are involved which introduces uncertainty in the interpretation stage. So far and because of their importance to the pharmaceutical industry, molecular modeling by a variety of means has been used to produce crude models, but there is still no consensus as to which residues line the binding cavity. In a previous study, a new biochemical approach for mapping the binding site crevice of the human R2adrenergic receptors (R2-ARs) was introduced by us (7). Based on a three-dimensional (3D) receptor model, each of the residues (197-201 and 204) in the fifth transmembrane domain (TM5) of the human R2A-AR was changed to cysteine (Cys). Subsequently, the irreversible binding of chloroethylclonidine (CEC), an alkylating derivative of the R2-adrenergic agonist clonidine, was used as a criterion for identifying the introduced Cys residues as being exposed in the binding cavity. Thus, the results supported a model in which Val197, Ser200, Cys201, and Ser204 are exposed to the binding cavity and residues Ile198, Ser199, Ile202, and Gly203 face the lipid bilayer of the plasma membrane. To extend the utility of this approach, a molecular yardstick approach series of new synthetic receptor ligands was designed and synthesized. The new compounds (7a-d) have a N-methyl-1,2,3,4tetrahydroisoquinoline core conferring R2-AR affinity, a methanesulfonylthio group making them Cys-reactive, and an alkyl linker of variable length connecting the two functional moieties. The basic assumption is that varying the length of the linker affects the alkylating properties of 7a-d by placing distance constraints on the receptor-ligand interaction. This paper describes the synthesis, molecular modeling, and initial characterization of the set of 6-(ω-methanelsulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-Nmethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines (7a-d) as sitespecific labeling agents providing information that is useful for further improving the reliability of 3D models

S1043-1802(97)00193-6 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society Published on Web 04/21/1998

Yardsticks for Probing R2-Adrenergic Receptors

of R2A-ARs, as well as other closely related receptors. A similar chemistry has very recently been applied by Berglund et al. (8) to obtain a series of chemically modified cysteine mutants of subtilisin. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

General Methods. Chromatographic purifications were carried out on Kieselgel 60 (Merck) silica gel and TLC analyses on Alufolien Kieselgel 60 F254 (Merck) TLC plates, using the following eluent systems: system A, 8:92 methanol/dichloromethane (v/v); system B, 1.5:98.5 methanol/dichloromethane (v/v); and system C, 7:93 triethylamine/dichloromethane (v/v). The NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL JNM-GX 400, JEOL JNM-A 500, or Bruker AW 80 NMR spectrometers. The chemical shifts are given in parts per million from internal TMS. The mass spectra of small molecular compounds were recorded on a 7070E VG mass spectrometer, and that of the peptide conjugate was recorded on a Finnigan MAT Lasermat mass spectrometer. Pyridine was dried by refluxing with CaH2 and then stored over 4 Å molecular sieves. [3H]RX821002 [2-(2-methoxy-1,4-benzodioxan-2yl)-2-imidazoline] was from Amersham (Buckinghamshire, U.K.; specific activity of 52 Ci/mmol). Phentolamine and CEC were from Research Biochemicals Inc. (Natick, MA). Cell culture reagents were supplied by Gibco (Gaithersburg, MD). The construction of expression vectors and receptor production have been described elsewhere (7). Saturation isotherms of [3H]RX821002 binding when analyzed by LIGAND (9) gave the following receptor affinities (Kd) and receptor densities (Bmax): 0.60 ( 0.02 nM (Bmax ) 595 ( 2 fmol mg-1) for HR2Awt, 6.12 ( 0.46 nM (Bmax ) 1870 ( 111 fmol mg-1) for HR2Bwt, and 0.53 ( 0.05 nM (Bmax ) 295 ( 22 fmol mg-1) for HR2ASer201Cys197 (7). The radioligand binding assays were performed with cell homogenates in potassium phosphate buffer as previously described (10). Competition and inactivation studies were carried out using [3H]RX821002 concentrations that were close to its affinity constant (Kd) at each receptor and 10-13 concentrations of the competitors. The receptor inactivation was investigated in parallel assays with CEC and 7a-d. The concentrations used for inactivation were 2-3Ki (inhibition constant) for each compound. The cell homogenates were first incubated with CEC (1 µM) or 7a-d (5 µM) in 2.5 mL of potassium phosphate buffer for 45 min at 37 °C. The protein content was 0.3-0.5 mg/mL. The cell membranes were then pelleted at 40000g for 15 min at 4 °C, washed twice with 2.5 mL of ice-cold potassium phosphate buffer, and rehomogenized with the Ultra-Turrax homogenizer. Residual R2-AR binding was assessed by incubating the membranes (0.1-0.2 mg of protein/assay tube) with 2.5 nM [3H]RX821002. Nonspecific binding was determined by including 10 µM phentolamine in parallel assays. Molecular Modeling. The Tripos program Sybyl was used to perform molecular modeling on a Silicon Graphics Indigo 2 machine fitted with 128 megabytes of memory. The starting structure of each of the compounds in the series had the reactive side chain in a fully extended conformation and the amine nitrogen atom assigned an N4 atom type. Energy minimization was performed using the Tripos force field without electrostatics. Conformational dynamics were calculated using the Tripos force field without electrostatics, at 310 K, for a 1 ns time period, with a step size of 1 fs, saving coordinates every 50 fs. The dynamic trajectory frames were read into standard Sybyl tables, where atom-atom distances were calculated and statistical analysis was performed.

Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 9, No. 3, 1998 359

6-Methoxy-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 2. 6-Methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (1) (11) (1.28 g, 7.8 mmol) was dissolved into a mixture of formic acid (1.5 mL) and formaldehyde (1.4 mL of a 40% aqueous solution). The reaction mixture was first warmed to 30 °C and, when the formation of CO2 was ceased, to 80 °C. After 4 h, the reaction mixture was made acidic (pH ∼ 3) with dilute aqueous hydrogen chloride and then washed with diethyl ether. The aqueous solution was made alkaline with aqueous sodium hydroxide and extracted with diethyl ether. The organic layer was separated, dried on Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness. Yield: 1.1 g (80%). MS(EI) (relative intensity): 176 (100, M+ - 1), 161 (20), 134 (93). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 6.93 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.69 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.6 Hz, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.64 (d, 1H, J ) 2.6 Hz), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.52 (s, 2H), 2.90 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0 Hz), 2.66 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0 Hz), 2.45 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 29.5, 46.1, 52.8, 55.2, 57.5, 112.0, 113.2, 127.0, 127.3, 134.9, 157.9. 6-Hydroxy-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 3. 2 (1.07 g, 6.0 mmol) was dissolved in 25 mL of 47% aqueous HBr and refluxed for 4 h under nitrogen. The solution was evaporated to dryness, and 3 was recrystallized from ethanol as hydrobromide. A total of 1.2 g (81%) of white crystals was obtained. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 162 (100, M+ - 1), 120 (60). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 9.88 (s, 1H), 9.53 (s, 1H), 6.99 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.68 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.6 Hz, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.62 (d, 1H, J ) 2.5 Hz), 4.37 (d, 1H, J ) 14.4 Hz), 4.16 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.2 Hz, J ) 14.4 Hz), 3.62 (m, 1H), 3.29 (m, 1H), 3.07 (m, 1H), 2.97 (m, 1H), 2.91 (d, 3H, J ) 4.3 Hz). 13 C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 25.1, 41.9, 50.3, 53.5, 114.3, 114.5, 118.4, 127.6, 131.9, 156.8. The hydrobromide of 3 (1.0 g, 4.1 mmol) was dissolved in water, and 2 mol L-1 aqueous sodium hydroxide (2.0 mL, 4.1 mmol) was added. The precipitated product was filtered, washed with a small amount of water, and dried under reduced pressure. Yield: 0.52 g (77%). MS(EI) (relative intensity): 162 (100, M+ - 1), 120 (66). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 9.07 (s, 1H), 6.80 (d, 1H, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.49 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.5 Hz, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.46 (d, 1H, J ) 2.2 Hz), 3.33 (s, 2H), 2.69 (t, 2H, J ) 5.7 Hz), 2.50 (t, 2H, J ) 5.7 Hz), 2.28 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 29.3, 46.2, 52.8, 57.5, 113.4, 114.9, 125.5, 127.4, 135.0, 155.7. 6-(Triphenylmethoxy)-1-hexanol 8d. Triphenylmethyl chloride (10.0 g, 36 mmol) was dissolved in dry pyridine, and 10.6 g (90 mmol) of 1,6-hexanediol was added. After 16 h, the reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane, washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate and brine, dried on Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness. The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (system B). Yield: 11.9 g (92%). 1H NMR (80 MHz, CDCl3): 7.10-7.50 (m, 15H), 3.60 (t, 2H, J ) 5 Hz), 3.05 (t, 2H, J ) 5 Hz), 1.20-1.70 (m, 8H). 5-(Triphenylmethoxy)-1-pentanol 8c was prepared from 1,5-pentanediol as previously described for 8d. Yield: 84%. 1H NMR (80 MHz, CDCl3): 7.10-7.50 (m, 15H), 3.60 (t, 2H, J ) 5 Hz), 3.05 (t, 2H, J ) 5 Hz), 1.251.70 (m, 6H). 4-(Triphenylmethoxy)-1-butanol 8b was prepared from 1,4-butanediol as previously described for 8d. Yield: 90%. 1H NMR (80 MHz, CDCl3): 7.10-7.50 (m, 15H), 3.60 (t, 2H, J ) 5 Hz), 3.10 (t, 2H, J ) 5 Hz), 1.551.75 (m, 4H). 3-(Triphenylmethoxy)-1-propanol 8a was prepared from 1,3-propanediol as previously described for 8d. Yield: 65%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.2-7.5 (m,

360 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 9, No. 3, 1998

15H), 3.77 (t, 2H, J ) 5.8 Hz), 3.28 (t, 2H, J ) 5.8 Hz), 1.86 (m, 2H). 6-[(6-Hydroxyhexyl)oxy]-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 5d. 3 (0.50 g, 3.1 mmol) was dissolved in THF. 8d (1.5 g, 4.3 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (0.96 g, 3.7 mmol) were added. To this solution was added dropwise 0.57 mL (3.7 mmol) of diethyl azodicarboxylate (DEAD), and the mixture was left to stand for 24 h. After completion of the reaction (TLC, system A), dichloromethane was added and the solution was washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate, dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated. 4d was dissolved in 25 mL of 1 mol L-1 aqueous hydrogen chloride, and the mixture was refluxed for 1 h, allowed to cool to room temperature, and washed with ethyl acetate. Aqueous sodium hydroxide solution was added, and the product was extracted to ethyl acetate, dried on Na2SO4, and evaporated. The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (system C). Yield: 0.53 g (66%). MS(EI) (relative intensity): 262 (100, M+ - 1), 220 (12), 162 (36), 120 (45). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 6.92 (d, 1H, J ) 8.5 Hz), 6.68 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.4 Hz, J ) 8.5 Hz), 6.63 (d, 1H, J ) 2.2 Hz), 3.92 (t, 2H, J ) 6.6 Hz), 3.65 (t, 2H, J ) 6.6 Hz), 3.51 (s, 2H), 2.89 (t, 2H, J ) 5.8 Hz), 2.65 (t, 2H, J ) 5.8 Hz), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.74-1.81 (m, 2H), 1.561.63 (m, 2H), 1.38-1.52 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 25.6, 25.9, 29.3, 29.5, 32.7, 46.1, 52.9, 57.5, 62.8, 67.8, 112.5, 113.9, 126.8, 127.3, 134.9, 157.5. 6-[(5-Hydroxypentyl)oxy]-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 5c was prepared from 3c as previously described for 5d. Yield: 62%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 248 (100, M+ - 1), 206 (11), 162 (49), 120 (57). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 6.92 (d, 1H, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.68 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.4 Hz, J ) 8.6 Hz), 6.63 (d, 1H, J ) 2.2 Hz), 3.92 (t, 2H, J ) 6.4 Hz), 3.65 (t, 2H, J ) 6.4 Hz), 3.51 (s, 2H), 2.89 (t, 2H, J ) 5.9 Hz), 2.66 (t, 2H, J ) 5.9 Hz), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.75-1.82 (m, 2H), 1.59-1.66 (m, 2H), 1.45-1.55 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 22.4, 29.1, 29.5, 32.5, 46.1, 52.8, 57.5, 62.7, 67.8, 112.5, 113.9, 126.8, 127.3, 134.9, 157.4. 6-[(4-Hydroxybutyl)oxy]-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 5b was prepared from 3b as previously described for 5d. Yield: 67%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 234 (93, M+ - 1), 192 (7), 162 (63), 120 (100). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 6.92 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.69 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.6 Hz, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.64 (d, 1H, J ) 2.5 Hz), 3.97 (t, 2H, J ) 6.3 Hz), 3.71 (t, 2H, J ) 6.3 Hz), 3.52 (s, 2H), 2.89 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0 Hz), 2.67 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0 Hz), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.84-1.89 (m, 2H), 1.72-1.77 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ): 25.9, 29.4, 29.6, 46.0, 52.7, 3 57.4, 62.6, 67.9, 112.5, 114.0, 126.8, 127.3, 134.9, 157.4. 6-[(3-Hydroxypropyl)oxy]-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 5a was prepared from 3a as previously described for 5d. Yield: 73%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 220 (100, M+ - 1), 178 (29), 162 (46), 120 (50). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 6.87 (d, 1H, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.6 (m, 2H), 3.92 (t, 2H, J ) 6.3 Hz), 3.49 (t, 2H, J ) 6.1 Hz), 3.33 (s, 2H), 2.72 (t, 2H, J ) 5.6 Hz), 2.49 (t, 2H, J ) 5.9 Hz), 2.26 (s, 3H), 1.73-1.83 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 29.0, 32.2, 45.8, 52.3, 56.9, 57.3, 64.4, 112.3, 113.5, 126.8, 127.0, 134.8, 156.8. 6-(6-Methanesulfonyloxyhexoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 6d. 5d (0.26 g, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in a small amount of dry pyridine, and 10 mg of (dimethylamino)pyridine and 0.21 g (1.2 mmol) of methanesulfonic anhydride were added. After completion of reaction (TLC, system A), dichloromethane was added and the solution was washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate. The organic layer was dried on Na2-

Heinonen et al.

SO4 and evaporated. The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (system A). Yield: 0.20 g (59%). MS(EI) (relative intensity): 340 (100, M+ - 1), 298 (19), 244 (14), 162 (35), 120 (48). 6-(5-Methanesulfonyloxypentoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 6c was prepared from 5c as previously described for 6d. Yield: 61%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 326 (100, M+ - 1), 284 (21), 230 (15), 162 (47), 120 (64). 6-(4-Methanesulfonyloxybutoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 6b was prepared from 5b as previously described for 6d. Yield: 52%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 312 (100, M+ - 1), 270 (23), 216 (14), 162 (38), 120 (33). 6-(3-Methanesulfonyloxypropoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 6a was prepared from 5a as previously described for 6d. Yield: 62%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 298 (100, M+ - 1), 256 (15), 202 (10), 162 (40), 120 (50). 6-(6-Methanesulfonylthiohexoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 7d. 6d (0.18 g, 0.5 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol, and 0.15 g (1.1 mmol) of sodium methanethiosulfonate was added. The reaction mixture was incubated for 65 h at 50 °C and then diluted with dichloromethane. After being washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate, being dried on Na2SO4, and evaporation, the product was purified by silica gel chromatography (system A). Yield: 82 mg (42%). MS(EI) (relative intensity): 356 (100, M+ - 1), 278 (24), 162 (33), 146 (11), 120 (39). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 6.93 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.69 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.6 Hz, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.63 (d, 1H, J ) 2.5 Hz), 3.92 (t, 2H, J ) 6.3 Hz), 3.59 (s, 2H), 3.32 (s, 3H), 3.18 (t, 2H, J ) 7.4 Hz), 2.92 (t, 2H, J ) 6.1 Hz), 2.74 (t, 2H, J ) 6.1 Hz), 2.50 (s, 3H), 1.76-1.82 (m, 4H), 1.49-1.51 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (120 MHz, CDCl3): 25.5, 28.3, 29.0, 29.1, 29.5, 36.4, 45.7, 50.6, 52.6, 57.1, 67.6, 112.7, 113.9, 126.2, 127.4, 134.6, 157.5. 6-(5-Methanesulfonylthiopentoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 7c was prepared from 6c as previously described for 7d. Yield: 39%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 342 (100, M+ - 1), 264 (36), 162 (68), 146 (18), 120 (68). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 6.93 (d, 1H, J ) 8.6 Hz), 6.68 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.7 Hz, J ) 8.6 Hz), 6.63 (d, 1H, J ) 2.2 Hz), 3.94 (t, 2H, J ) 6.3 Hz), 3.60 (s, 2H), 3.32 (s, 3H), 3.20 (t, 2H, J ) 7.3 Hz), 2.93 (t, 2H, J ) 6.1 Hz), 2.75 (t, 2H, J ) 6.1 Hz), 2.51 (s, 3H), 1.771.87 (m, 4H), 1.59-1.64 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (120 MHz, CDCl3): 25.2, 28.6, 29.1, 29.3, 36.3, 45.7, 50.7, 52.7, 57.2, 67.4, 112.7, 113.9, 126.2, 127.4, 134.6, 157.4. 6-(4-Methanesulfonylthiobutoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 7b was prepared from 6b as previously described for 7d. Yield: 36%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 328 (100, M+ - 1) 250 (21), 162 (62), 146 (12), 120 (38). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 6.93 (d, 1H, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.68 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.4 Hz, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.63 (d, 1H, J ) 2.4 Hz), 3.97 (t, 2H, J ) 5.9 Hz), 3.59 (s, 2H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.26 (t, 2H, J ) 7.3 Hz), 2.93 (t, 2H, J ) 5.9 Hz), 2.74 (t, 2H, J ) 5.9 Hz), 2.51 (s, 3H), 1.892.00 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 26.5, 28.0, 29.0, 36.2, 45.7, 50.8, 52.6, 57.1, 66.9, 112.7, 113.9, 126.4, 127.4, 134.3, 157.1. 6-(3-Methanesulfonylthiopropoxy)-2-N-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 7a was prepared from 6a as previously described for 7d. Yield: 14%. MS(EI) (relative intensity): 314 (100, M+ - 1), 162 (39), 146 (19), 120 (24). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 6.93 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.68 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.6 Hz, J ) 8.3 Hz), 6.64 (d, 1H, J ) 2.6 Hz), 4.05 (t, 2H, J ) 7.4 Hz), 3.57 (s, 2H), 3.37 (t, 2H, J ) 7.1 Hz), 3.32 (s, 3H), 2.93 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0

Yardsticks for Probing R2-Adrenergic Receptors Scheme 1a

Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 9, No. 3, 1998 361 Scheme 2a

a (i) Methanesulfonic anhydride/Py, 20 h; (ii) sodium methanethiosulfonate, EtOH, 50 °C, 65 h; (iii) p-toluenesulfonyl chloride/Py.

a (i) Aqueous formaldehyde (37%)/formic acid, 80 °C, 4 h; (ii) 48% aqueous HBr, reflux, 4 h; (iii) 8a-d, Pph3, DEAD, THF, 24 h; (iv) 1 mol L-1 aqueous HCl, reflux, 1 h.

Hz), 2.72 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0 Hz), 2.48 (s, 3H), 2.46 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ): 29.2, 29.4, 33.2, 45.8, 50.4, 3 52.6, 57.2, 65.3, 112.6, 113.9, 126.9, 127.5, 134.9, 156.9. Hydrolysis of 7a-d. The rates of hydrolyses of 7a-d were measured at 37 °C in potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4). The aliquots of 40 µL were withdrawn at suitable intervals and analyzed immediately by HPLC [Purospher RP-18e column, 0.050 mol L-1 ammonium acetate buffer at pH 4.7, flow rate of 0.75 mL min-1; elution, 85:15 buffer/MeCN for 7a-b, 80:20 buffer/MeCN for 7c, and 75:25 buffer/MeCN for 7d; detection, 276 nm; tR(7a) ) 6.8 min, tR(7b) ) 12.6 min, tR(7c) ) 9.9 min, and tR(7d) ) 8.6 min]. The first-order rate constants were 4.3 × 10-4, 3.7 × 10-4, 3.2 × 10-4, and 2.8 × 10-4 s-1 for 7a-d, respectively. Reaction of 7a with Peptide YVISSCIGSF. One milligram (0.93 µmol) of the 10-mer oligopeptide Tyr-ValIle-Ser-Ser-Cys-Ile-Gly-Ser-Phe was dissolved in 10 mL of 50 mmol L-1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4 at 21 °C), and 2 equiv of 7a (0.58 mg, 1.86 µmol) was added. The reaction mixture was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. Analysis by MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy verified the conjugation. MS(MALDI): 1313.7. The reaction of 7a with YVISSCIGSF was further studied by HPLC. The peptide (0.3 µmol mL-1) was treated with 1 equiv of 7a, and the aliquots withdrawn were immediately chromatographed on a Purospher RP-18e column (0.050 mol L-1 ammonium acetate buffer at pH 4.7, flow rate of 0.75 mL min-1; elution, 85:15 buffer/MeCN; detection, 276 nm). RESULTS

Synthesis of 6-(ω-Methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines. 6-Methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (1) was prepared as described earlier (11); the nitrogen atom was methylated by an Eschweiler-Clarke reaction (2), and the 6-methoxy group was converted to a 6-hydroxy group with boiling of aqueous 48% hydrogen bromide under nitrogen (3). The phenolic hydroxy function of 3 was then displaced with an appropriate monotritylated R,ω-diol by Mitsunobu reaction, and the product (4a-d) was detritylated to give 5a-d (Scheme 1). Several alkyl methanethiosulfonates have previously been prepared from alkyl halides by SN2 substitution

with sodium methanethiosulfonate. Accordingly, conversion of 5a-d to the corresponding tosylates, followed by displacement with sodium methanethiosulfonate, was considered to be a viable route to 7a-d. However, all attempts to convert 5a-d to tosylates were unsuccessful. By contrast, less reactive mesylates 6a-d could be easily obtained. Use of mesyl anhydride, instead of the more commonly used mesyl chloride, proved to be essential, since 6a-d reacted surprisingly easily with the chloride ion released to the reaction mixture upon the SN2 displacement. Compounds 6a-d turned out to be relatively unstable. To obtain reasonable yields of 7a-d, the reaction with sodium methanethiosulfonate had to be started immediately after silica gel purification of 6a-d (Scheme 2). Covalent Coupling of 7a to Model Peptide YVISSCIGSF. The applicability of 7a-d in protein labeling, and hence as useful agents in R2-adrenergic receptor mapping, was demonstrated by reacting one of them with a cysteine residue of model peptide YVISSCIGSF. This peptide is part of the TM5 region of the human R2A-AR. Two equivalents of 7a was added to the solution of the model peptide in 0.050 mol L-1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4 at 21 °C) at 37 °C, and after 1 h, a matrixassisted laser desorption mass spectrum was recorded from the reaction mixture. The disappearance of the signal referring to peptide YVISSCIGSF and the appearance of a new signal at higher field by 235 mass units indicated that 7a had formed a covalent conjugate with the peptide (Figure 1). The half-lives for the hydrolysis of 7a-d were observed to be 27 (7a), 31 (7b), 36 (7c), and 41 min (7d) under the conditions employed in the conjugation with the peptide. When the model peptide was treated at a 0.3 mmol L-1 concentration with 1 equiv of the most labile labeling agent (7a), the HPLC signal of 7a qualitatively disappeared in 2 min at 37 °C. Accordingly, the hydrolysis of 7a-d is slow enough to ensure efficient conjugation with the peptide. Molecular Modeling. Table 1 presents a summary of intramolecular atom-atom distances between the ω-sulfur and both the phenoxyl oxygen and the quaternary ammonium nitrogen occurring in the molecular dynamics trajectory of 7a-d. The maximal distance from the ether oxygen to the ω-sulfur in the side chain (n ) 3-6) spans from 5.3 to 8.7 Å and that from the amine nitrogen to sulfur from 11.6 to 14.5 Å. The successive increment per methylene group is about 1 Å (the theoretical upper limit of the distance resolution by a molecular yardstick approach). Whereas the average distance for the O-S atom pairs is incremental, the average distance for the N-S atom pairs is not. This is a result of folding back of the linker in the longer (n ) 6) side

362 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 9, No. 3, 1998

Heinonen et al.

Figure 1. MALDI-TOF spectra of peptide YVISSCIGSF (A) and its conjugate formed upon reaction with 7a (B). The peaks at m/z 1078.0 and 1115.1 represent the peptide and its potassium adduct, and that at 1313.6 represents the peptide conjugate formed by the displacement of the methanesulfonyl group of 7a by the peptide. Table 1. Intramolecular Atom-Atom Distances from Conformational Dynamics of 6-(ω-Methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-N-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines (7a-d) O-S distance (Å) 7a 7b 7c 7d

N-S distance (Å)

max

min

avg

SD

max

min

avg

SD

5.3 6.7 7.6 8.7

2.5 3.0 2.9 4.1

3.7 4.4 5.6 7.0

0.7 0.8 0.9 0.7

11.6 12.9 13.8 14.5

4.8 4.1 3.9 3.4

8.9 9.3 10.0 8.6

1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3

Table 2. Binding Affinities of CEC and 7a-d for r2-AR Variants, Determined by Competition Assays with [3H]RX821002a test compound CEC 7a 7b 7c 7d

HR2Awt

Ki (nM) HR2ASer201Cys197

HR2Bwt

578 2388 1560 1690 1780

60 1402 34 34 34

1500 2789 1530 1600 1100

a Mean values of two or three independent experiments are shown.

chain such that the shortest N-S distance of 3.4 Å is shorter than that of the other compound (n ) 3), 4.8 Å. Binding Affinity of CEC and 7a-d. The CECresistant wild-type receptor HR2B, the mutant HR2ASer201Cys197, and HR2Αwt were all capable of binding CEC and 7a-d (approximate Ki values of 34-2789 nM). Table 2 shows the results of competition binding assays, where CEC and 7a-d were allowed to compete with the radioligand [3H]RX821002 for binding to HR2Awt, HR2Bwt, and HR2ASer201Cys197 receptors. The Ki values

Figure 2. Effect of treatment with CEC and 7a-d on binding activity of human R2-AR subtypes. CHO cells expressing human R2-AR subtypes HR2Awt, HR2Bwt, and HR2ASer201Cys197 were incubated in the absence (control) and presence of CEC (1 µM) or 7a-d (5 µM) for 45 min at 37 °C, followed by two washes. The residual R2-AR binding capacity was determined by incubation with 2.5 nM [3H]RX821001. The nonspecific binding was determined with 10 µM phentolamine. The results are expressed as the percentage of specific [3H]RX821002 binding left after treatment with CEC or 7a-d. The results are means ( SE of three or four experiments, each performed in duplicate.

obtained do not accurately represent competitive affinities of binding of the test compounds to the receptors; in the case of HR2Awt and HR2ASer201Cys197 receptors, some irreversible binding is also taking place at this reaction temperature (25 °C). In any case, the results show that compounds 7a-d have quite high affinities for the receptors tested, comparable to that of CEC. Receptor Inactivation Studies. The alkylating effect of 7a-d was tested on three HR2-AR variants (HR2Awt, HR2Bwt, and the mutant HR2ASer201Cys197). Incubation of cell homogenates in the absence (control) and presence of CEC was performed for control purposes and as a reference for 7a-d. CEC treatment reduced the binding capacity of HR2Awt and HR2ASer201Cys197 by 61 and 91%, respectively, while HR2Bwt (lacking an exposed Cys residue) was not alkylated by CEC (Figure 2). In experiments with 7a-d, the mutant HR2ASer201Cys197 receptor was inactivated to a significant extent. Moreover, the degree of inactivation was linearly related to the length of the linker.

Yardsticks for Probing R2-Adrenergic Receptors DISCUSSION

This study is part of a series of studies aimed at providing geometric constraints from biochemical studies for improving the structural modeling of R2-adrenergic receptor subtypes, which are important drug target sites. Previously, we have shown that amino acid residues Val197, Ser200, Cys201, and Ser204 of the human R2AAR are accessible inside the binding cavity using cysteine substitution and covalent labeling with chloroethylclonidine (CEC) (7). Thus, a hypothetical three-dimensional model of the receptor, albeit admittedly rather crude, was supported. As an alkylating agent, CEC reacts via a reactive aziridinium ion species and is expected to be of use in the identification of amino acid residues located inside the binding cavity within the fourth, fifth, and sixth transmembrane helical elements. The development of the 6-(ω-methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4tetrahydroisoquinoline series is expected to aid in exploring regions of the receptor toward and outside the entrance of the binding cavity. Previous chemical studies with simple alkyl methanesulfonothiolates, RSSO2Me, show that the mercaptomethyl side chain of proteins is able to displace rapidly and quantitatively the methanesulfonyl group in dilute aqueous solution with concomitant formation of a disulfide linkage (12, 13). The specificity of this reaction for cysteine residues over other amino acid residues has also been demonstrated. Here, a pilot study was carried out on a 10-mer peptide with the sequence YVISSCIGSF, part of the sequence of the fifth transmembrane-spanning segment of the human R2A-AR, to determine the reaction conditions needed for biochemical inactivation studies of the receptor. The methanesulfonylthio group was the preferred labeling agent compared to more commonly used SH-reactive functions (including pyridyl disulfide, maleimido, and bromoacetyl groups) because it does not carry a formal charge, is relatively hydrophilic, and appears to be sterically less demanding. These features were attractive as they were considered less likely to affect pharmacophore interactions, as was borne out by similar binding affinities of the series. Three receptors were chosen for these studies; HR2Awt (Cys in position 201), HR2Bwt (Ser in position 177 corresponding to 201), and the mutant HR2ASer201Cys197 (Cys in position 197 close to the extracellular surface of the plasma membrane and Ser in position 201 in place of the wild-type Cys 201) (7). Inactivation of the HR2ASer201Cys197 indicates that the series of compounds 7a-d bind to R2-ARs in a manner similar to that of CEC, with the quaternary amine group of the tetrahydroisoquinoline core forming an ion pair with Asp113 of the third transmembrane helical element (TM3), and the benzene ring occupying the cavity region formed by TM4-TM5-TM6. Assuming that the methanesulfonylthioalkyl groups of 7a-d (n ) 3-6) react with a cysteine thiol group at similar rates and with a similar mode of binding, then the linear relationship from n ) 3 to n ) 6 probably reflects a progressive distance approach of the reactive methanesulfonylthioalkyl headgroup toward Cys197. This is interpreted here as locating this residue position about 8.6-14.5 Å from the position of Asp113, with the lower and upper limit corresponding to the average and maximum distances, respectively, indicated by molecular dynamics for compound 7d (Table 1). We did not yet explore compounds with a chain length of greater than 6 as already at this length the molecular dynamics showed that for this chain length there is a

Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 9, No. 3, 1998 363

significant proportion of folded conformation accessed. Although a rigid side chain would have helped in the interpretation of the results, it is less likely to be accommodated by the receptor through unfavorable steric interactions. Unlike CEC, none of the 7a-d series inactivated the human HR2A-AR, containing Cys201. In our previous study, we found that the relative rate of receptor inactivation by CEC was dependent on the location of the exposed Cys residue in the binding crevice. The Cys residues located close to the extracellular surface of the plasma membrane were alkylated significantly more avidly than those located deeper in the binding site pocket formed between the seven R-helical TM domains of the receptor protein. The HR2Bwt receptor, which is resistant to the alkylating effect of CEC, was used as a negative control. However, as can be seen in Figure 2, a moderate level of inactivation was observed with the compounds where n ) 5 and 6. This was possibly a result of covalent coupling to reactive residues in the loop region of the extracellular surface, which includes a cysteine residue in the loop between TM6 and TM7. That binding occurs before inactivation is indicated by comparison with a study on the D2 dopamine receptor by Javitch et al. (14). This study involved introduction of unique cysteine residues into the receptor followed by covalent labeling with a nonspecific cysteine methanesulfonylthio alkylating reagent. Concentrations in the millimolar range were required to cause receptor inactivation as opposed to the micromolar concentrations used in this study. In summary, we show that the 6-(ω-methanesulfonylthioalkoxy)-2-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolines have a binding mode similar to that of the human R2A-AR as CEC, the binding mode in each case being supported by covalent coupling. In terms of a molecular yardstick approach, this preliminary study shows that compounds 7a-d retain affinity at R2A-ARs and that a linear relationship exists between linker length and target site inactivation. LITERATURE CITED (1) Kobilka, B. K., Matsui, H., Kobilka, T. S., Yang-Feng, T. L., Francke, U., Caron, M. G., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Regan J. W. (1987) Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the gene coding for the human platelet R2-adrenergic receptor. Science 238, 650-656. (2) Lomasney, J. W., Lorenz, L. F., Allen, K., King, K., Regan, J. W., Yang-Feng, T. L., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1990) Expansion of the R2-adrenergic receptor family: cloning and characterization of a human R2-adrenergic receptor subtype, the gene for which is located on chromosome 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 5094-5098. (3) Regan, J. W., Kobilka, T. S., Yang-Feng, T. L., Caron, M. G., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Kobilka B. K. (1988) Cloning and expression of a human kidney cDNA for an R2-adrenergic receptor subtype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 85, 6301-6305. (4) Ruffolo, R. R., Nichols, A. J., Stadel, J. M., and Hieble, J. P. (1993) Pharmacologic and therapeutic applications of R2adrenoceptor subtypes. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 32, 243-279. (5) Marjama¨ki, A., Luomala, K., Ala-Uotila, S., and Scheinin, M. (1993) Use of recombinant human R2-adrenoceptors to characterize subtype selectivity of antagonist binding. Eur. J. Parmacol., Mol. Pharmacol. Sect. 246, 219-226. (6) Jansson, C. C., Marjama¨ki, A., Luomala, K., Savola, J.-M., Scheinin, M., and Åkerman, K. E. O. (1994) Coupling of human R2-adrenceptor subtypes to regulation of cAMPproduction in transfected S115 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol., Mol. Pharmacol. Sect. 266, 165-174.

364 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 9, No. 3, 1998 (7) Marjama¨ki, A., Pihlavisto, M., Cockcroft, V., Heinonen, P., Savola, J.-M., and Scheinin, M. (1998) Chloroethylclonidine binds irreversibly to exposed cysteines in the fifth membrane spanning domain of the human R2A-adrenergic receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. (in press). (8) Berglund, P., DeSantis, G., Stabile, M. R., Shang, X., Gold, M., Bott, R. R., Graycar, T. P., Lay, T. H., Mitchinson, C., and Jones, J. B. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 5265-5266. (9) McPherson, G. A. (1985) Analysis of radioligand binding experiments. A collection of computer programs for the IBM PC. J. Pharmacol. Methods 14, 213-229. (10) Halme, M., Sjo¨holm, B., Savola, J.-M., and Scheinin, M. (1995) Recombinant human R2-adrenoceptor subtypes: comparison of [3H]rauwolscine, [3H]atipamezole and [3H]RX821002 as radioligands. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1266, 207-214.

Heinonen et al. (11) Helfer, L. (1924) Sur la 6-me´thoxy-1,2,3,4-te´trahydroisoquinole´ine. Helv. Chim. Acta 7, 945-950. (12) Kenyon, G. L., and Bruice, T. W. (1977) Novel sulfhydryl reagents. Methods Enzymol. 47, 407-430. (13) Stauffer, D. A., and Karlin, A. (1994) Electrostatic potential of the acetylcholine binding sites in the nicotinic receptor probed by reactions of binding-site cysteines with charged methanethiosulfonates. Biochemistry 33, 6840-6849. (14) Javitch, J., Fu, A., and Chen, J. (1995) Residues in the fifth membrane-spanning segment of the dopamine D2 receptor exposed in the binding-site crevice. Biochemistry 34, 16433-16439.

BC970193O