Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF FINDLAY
Omics Technologies Applied to Agriculture and Food
A Targeted Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics Approach toward the Understanding of Host Responses to Huanglongbing Disease Wei-Lun Hung, and Yu Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04033 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Sep 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 18, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
A Targeted Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics Approach toward the Understanding of Host Responses to Huanglongbing Disease
Wei-Lun Hung,†‡ and Yu Wang*†
†Citrus Research and Education Center, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA ‡School of Food Safety, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan
*Please send all correspondence to: Dr. Yu Wang Citrus Research and Education Center Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition University of Florida 700, Experiment Station Rd, Lake Alfred, FL 33850 USA Phone: 863-956-8673 Fax: 863-956-4631 E-mail:
[email protected] 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
ABSTRACT
2
Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) is the major culprit of Huanglongbing (HLB), the most
3
destructive citrus disease worldwide. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most common
4
method for detecting the presence of CLas in the tree. However, due to uneven distribution of
5
bacteria and a minimum bacterial titer requirement, an infected tree may test false negative. Thus,
6
our current study profiled primary and secondary metabolites of CLas-free leaves harvested from
7
citrus undercover protection system (CUPS) to prevent a misjudgment of CLas infection.
8
Functional enrichment analysis revealed several metabolic pathways significantly affected by
9
CLas infection, mainly biosynthesis of amino acids and secondary metabolites. Comparisons of
10
CLas-infected metabolite alterations among oranges, mandarins and grapefruits revealed that
11
host responses to CLas were different. The metabolite signature highlighted in this study will
12
provide a fuller understanding into how CLas bacteria affects biosynthesis of primary and
13
secondary metabolites in different hosts.
14
15
Keywords: citrus, metabolomics, Huanglongbing, Candidatus Liberibacter, metabolic pathway
16
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 40
Page 3 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
17
INTRODUCTION
18
Huanglongbing, also known as citrus greening disease, is a devastating disease affecting all
19
varieties of citrus worldwide. This destructive disease is associated with infection of the gram-
20
negative bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) transmitted by the Asian citrus
21
psyllid (ACP) Diaphorina citri, the vector of HLB. HLB was first reported in southern China in
22
1919, and subsequently has spread throughout to different countries in Africa, Asia, South and
23
North Americas.1 In the United States, HLB was first confirmed in south Miami-Dade County in
24
2005, and it is present in all citrus-growing areas including Texas and California.2-3 Different
25
symptoms can be found in all parts of the tree including leaves, twigs and fruits. In leaves, the
26
typical symptoms include blotchy mottles, yellow veins and green islands, ultimately followed
27
by the death of the entire plant (Figure S1).4 Furthermore, HLB also profoundly affects flavor
28
and the taste quality of citrus fruits. Several studies have found that HLB-affected oranges had a
29
lower soluble solids content (SSC)/titratable acid (TA), resulting in the HLB-affected juice being
30
perceived as less sweet than the juice from healthy trees.5 Meanwhile, descriptive sensory
31
evaluation from 16 panelists indicated that HLB-affected orange juice was perceived as more
32
bitter than healthy orange juice due to high contents of limonoids and flavonoids.5-6 Recently,
33
sensory descriptions of active taste compounds of orange juice isolated from centrifugal partition
34
chromatography and preparative high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) suggested
35
that hydroxycinnamic acids and other compounds may also contribute to the bitterness of HLB-
36
affected Valencia orange juice in addition to limonoids and flavonoids.7
37
Since HLB is one of the most destructive diseases in citrus, different strategies have been
38
developed to delay the progression of HLB, including antimicrobials, thermotherapy and
39
nonantimicrobial compounds.8 For example, a recent study documented the effects of
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
40
oxyteracycline hydrochloride trunk injections on HLB-affected Hamlin orange trees.9 The
41
population density of CLas remained significantly lower in treated trees compared to that from
42
untreated controls for 9 months. In addition, thermotherapy appears to be a potential strategy to
43
suppress phytopathogen titer, at least, in the green house and growth chamber.10-11 Combined
44
with applications of broad-spectrum insecticides and foliar nutrients, fruit yield increased
45
significantly.12 Although these treatments could delay the progression of HLB, there is no cure to
46
eliminate this disease. Therefore, according to the latest statistical report from the Florida
47
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, citrus production in Florida decreased from
48
94.2 million boxes in the 2015-2016 season to 78.1 million boxes in the 2016-2017 season.13
49
Over the last decade, metabolomics has emerged as a comprehensive approach to achieve
50
a global view of biological systems through the profiling of metabolites from bodily fluids, cells
51
and tissues. Among different methodologies used for metabolite discovery, mass spectrometry is
52
an excellent analytical platform for metabolomics analysis due to its high sensitivity and
53
versatility.14 In recent years, liquid chromatography or gas chromatography coupled with mass
54
spectrometry has been employed to understand plant’s responses to HLB. For example, a
55
targeted metabolomics approach using high performance liquid chromatography-mass
56
spectrometry (LC-MS) was carried out to profile alterations of secondary metabolites in sweet
57
orange leaves infected with CLas.15 In flavoromics, changes of key aroma compounds in citrus
58
fruits after CLas infection have been characterized using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
59
(GC-MS).6, 16 Our recent research revealed a positive link between lipid oxidation products and
60
long-chain fatty acids in response to HLB using a targeted metabolomics approach.17
61
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique is the most common method used to detect
62
the presence of CLas in citrus trees.18 However, limitations of PCR such as requirement of a
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 40
Page 5 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
63
minimum bacterial titer and uneven distribution of bacteria throughout the tree make PCR prone
64
to false negatives, especially at early stages of infection. A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-
65
based metabolomics study revealed that healthy Hamlin oranges could not be completely
66
separated from asymptomatic fruits in the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)
67
model, suggesting that some of the healthy fruits were possibly false negatives due to uneven
68
distribution of bacteria.19 Our recent metabolomics study has also compared volatile and
69
nonvolatile profiles of healthy Hamlin orange fruits collected from citrus undercover protection
70
systems (CUPS) with HLB asymptomatic and symptomatic fruits.16 CUPS, consisting of a pole
71
and cable frame architecture, physically prevents the trees from coming into contact with ACP.20
72
However, no consistent pattern could be observed in both volatile and nonvolatile metabolites as
73
compared to previous studies, indicating that the metabolite profile of Hamlin orange fruits
74
significantly changed earlier than detecting CLas infection by PCR. To better understand how
75
CLas infection affects metabolite changes in the different hosts and prevent a misjudgment of
76
health status due to uneven distribution of CLas and detection limits of PCR, our current study
77
profiled primary and secondary metabolites of CLas-free leaves from Hamlin oranges, Murcott
78
mandarins and Ray Ruby grapefruits, harvested from CUPS. Comparisons of metabolite profiles
79
of truly CLas-free trees and their corresponding CLas-infected trees will provide a fuller
80
understanding of the host responses to CLas bacteria in different citrus species as well as acquire
81
useful information for developing potential treatments against HLB.
82
83
MATERIALS AND METHODS
84
Chemical and reagents
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 40
85
All solvents used in this study were LC-MS grade and purchased from Fisher Scientific
86
(Waltham, MA, U.S.A). Authentic standards of organic acids, amino acids, sugars and sugar
87
alcohols were purchased from Sigma Co. (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A). Authentic standards of
88
eriocitrin, narirutin, hesperidin, didymin, hesperetin, isosinensetin, sinensetin, 5,6,7,3’,4’,5’-
89
hexamethoxyflavone, nobiletin, isosakuranetin and neoeriocitrin were purchased from Indofine
90
Chemical Co. (Hillsborough, NJ, U.S.A). Rutin, apigenin, diosmetin, limonin, luteolin, naringin,
91
neohesperidin and poncirin were sourced from Sigma Co. Meranzin, isomeranzin, tetramethoxy-
92
o-isoscutellarein, tetramethoxy-o-scutellarein and 3,5,6,7,8,3’,4’-heptamethoxyflavone were
93
purchased from Yuanye Biotech (Shanghai, China). Scopoletin was purchased from ChromaDex
94
(Irvine,
95
hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma Co.
96
Plant materials
97
Leaf samples from Hamlin orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck), Murcott mandarin (Citrus
98
reticulata Blanco) and Ray Ruby grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) used in this study were
99
grown at the University of Florida’s Citrus Research Education Center (CREC, Lake Alfred,
100
Florida). All trees were planted in August 2014 and leaf samples were harvested in June 2016.
101
The healthy samples were collected from CUPS to guarantee the tree was truly CLas-free,20
102
while the CLas-infected samples were collected from the field. CUPS and the field are located at
103
CREC. Three plants (n=3) from each species were sampled from CUPS (healthy, CLas-free) and
104
the field (CLas-infected). The CLas-free and Clas-infected leaves were from the same rootstock.
105
The rootstocks of Hamlin oranges, Murcott mandarins and Ray Ruby grapefruits were Swingle,
106
Kuharske and Sour orange, respectively. Several leaves were collected from different locations
107
(top, middle and bottom) of each tree. Typical symptoms of HLB could be found in CLas-
CA,
U.S.A).
N-methyl-N-(trimethylsily)trifluoacetamide
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
and
methoxyamine
Page 7 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
108
infected leaves, including blotchy mottles, green islands and yellow veins (Figure S1). Leaf
109
samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at -80
110
Leaves from different locations of each tree were pooled and ground before metabolite extraction.
111
The presence of CLas in the infected trees and its absence in healthy trees were confirmed by
112
qPCR.18 The qPCR data of CLa-infected leaves revealed average cycle threshold values of
113
26.91±0.49 for Hamlin oranges, 27.51±1.02 for Murcott mandarins and 26.81±2.74 for Ray
114
Ruby grapefruits. Generally, Ct values under 30 are considered confidently positive, while
115
higher numbers are considered ambiguous.21
116
Sugar, sugar alcohol and organic acid analysis
117
Thirty three milligrams of ground leaves were extracted with 470 µL 80% methanol containing
118
20 µL adonitol as internal standard (1 mg/mL in methanol) by agitation for 10 min. After
119
centrifugation at 1000g for 10 min at 4 o C, the supernatant was collected and the solvent and
120
moisture were removed by a SpeedVac evaporator (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The
121
dried residue was mixed with 30 µL of methoxyamine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL in pyridine)
122
and
123
(trimethylsily)trifluoacetamide was added to the mixture and then shaken for an additional 30
124
min prior to GC-MS analysis. A 7890 gas chromatograph coupled with an Agilent 5975C mass
125
spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A) was employed to analyze sugar, sugar alcohols and
126
organic acids. The carrier gas was helium and a split ratio was 1:20 with a 1.1 mL/min flow rate.
127
The temperature of the ion transfer line and injection port was set at 230 oC. An Rxi-5 MS
128
column (30 m Χ 0.25 mm; 0.25 µm film thickness, Restek, Bellefonte, PA, U.S.A) was carried
129
out to separate analytes. The oven temperature was initially set at 70 oC for 5 min, and then
130
ramped up by 4 oC /min to 270 oC, followed by 20 oC /min to 320 oC and held for 5 min. A
then
shaken
for
2
h
at
room
temperature.
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Finally,
80
o
C until analysis.
µL
N-methyl-N-
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
131
solvent delay of 5 min was applied. Scan of mass spectrometry was ranged from m/z 60 to 650.
132
Compound identification was confirmed by the retention time of authentic standards and the
133
NIST library. Relative concentrations of sugars, sugar alcohols and organic acids were semi-
134
quantitated based on the concentration of the internal standard.
135
Amino acid analysis
136
Fifty milligrams of ground leaves were extracted with 1mL 80% methanol containing 10 µL
137
theanine (1 mg/mL, internal standard) by sonication for 30 min. After centrifugation at 5,000g
138
for 5 min at 4 o C, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm nylon filter prior to LC-MS
139
analysis. The analytical method was performed as described by our previous work.16 In brief, a
140
Thermo Ultimate 3000 HPLC equipped with a Thermo TSQ Quantiva triple quadrupole
141
electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) was carried out for
142
analyzing amino acids. Chromatographic separations were achieved using a Tosoh TSKgel
143
Amide-80 column. The mobile phase consisted of 2.5 mM ammonium formate and 2.5 mM
144
ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile aqueous solution containing 0.15 % formic acid (A) and
145
2.5 mM ammonium formate and 2.5 mM ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile containing
146
0.15% formic acid (B). The gradient program was set as follows: 0-10 min, 100-90% B; 10-16
147
min, 90-80% B; 16-20 min, 80-50% B; 20-24 min, 50% B. The injection volume was 5 µL.
148
Authentic standards were directly infused into the mass spectrometer at a flow rate of 0.2
149
mL/min. The product ions, collision energy and RF lens of each analyte were optimized using
150
TSQ Quantiva Tune software (Thermo Scientific).The SRM transitions, collision energy, RF
151
lens and retention time of amino acids are given in Table S1. Relative concentrations of amino
152
acids were semi-quantitated based on the concentration of the internal standard
153
Flavonoid, coumarin and limonoid analysis 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 40
Page 9 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
154
One hundred milligrams of ground leaves were extracted with 1 mL methanol containing 10 µL
155
catechin (1 mg/mL, as internal standard) by sonication for 15 min. After centrifugation at 5000g
156
for 10 min, the supernatant was collected and solvent was evaporated by a speedVac evaporator.
157
The dried residue was reconstituted in 500 µL methanol and then subjected to a C18 solid phase
158
extraction cartridge (100 mg, Restek, Bellefonte, PA, U.S.A) and then eluted with 500 µL
159
methanol. The eluents were combined and 10 µL was injected into LC-MS (TSQ Quantiva,
160
Thermo Scientific). The analytical method was modified from our previous work.16 In brief,
161
chromatographic separations were carried out using a Phenomenex Gemini C18 column (3 µm, 3
162
Χ 150 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA. U.S.A) with a mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic
163
acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B). The gradient program was set as
164
follows: 0-20 min, 5-75% B, 25-26 min, 75-95% B, 26-33 min, 95% B. The flow rate and
165
injection volume were set at 0.2 mL/min. The SRM transitions, collision energy, RF lens and
166
retention time of the analytes are given in Table S2. Relative concentrations of the analytes were
167
semi-quantitated based on the concentration of the internal standard.
168
Statistical Analysis
169
Data are expressed as means of relative concentrations of the metabolites compared to that of
170
healthy leaves. Significant differences were statistically detected by Student’s t test using MS
171
Excel (Version 2016, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, U.S.A). A significant difference was
172
considered when p < 0.05. PLS-DA was performed using SIMCA-P software (Umea, Sweden)
173
with mean centering and unit variance scaling. The confidence of tolerance ellipse in the PLS-
174
DA model was 95% based on Hotelling’s T-squared distribution. The quality of the PLS-DA
175
model was described in terms of three parameters. R2X and R2Y were used to quantitate the
176
good-of-fit and Q2 was used to assess the predictability of the model. To rule out the non-
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
177
randomness of separation between groups, a 100-iteration random permutation test was also
178
carried out to validate the PLS-DA model. After a log transformation, the heat map was
179
performed using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/). Metabolic pathways were
180
constructed using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database
181
(https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) as a reference.
182 183
RESULTS
184
Alterations of organic acids, sugar, and sugar alcohols in citrus leaves by CLas-infection
185
GC-MS was employed to analyze organic acids, sugars and sugar alcohols in citrus leaves after
186
metabolite derivatization. A total of 10 organic acids, 6 sugars and 3 sugar alcohols were
187
analyzed. In CLas-free Hamlin oranges and Murcott mandarin, no significant changes could be
188
found in most of organic acids as compared to the CLas-infected leaves (Table 1). The levels of
189
fumaric acid and malic acid in CLas-free Hamlin oranges were significantly higher than that
190
from CLas-infected oranges, while the level of citric acids in Murcott mandarins and Ray Ruby
191
grapefruits significantly increased after CLas infection. In Ray Ruby grapefruit, levels of maleic
192
acid, succinic acid, glyceric acid and quinic acid significantly decreased after CLas infection. In
193
the sugar profile, the concentration of melibiose significantly increased in both CLas-infected
194
Hamlin oranges and Murcott mandarins. In grapefruits, CLas-infected leaves had lower levels of
195
glucose, fructose, galactose and myo-inositol as compared to CLas-free leaves (Table 1).
196
Alterations of amino acids in citrus leaves by CLas-infection
197
Amino acids are crucial primary metabolites directly involved in plant growth and metabolism.
198
Here, we used hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled with MS to determine amino
199
acids in leaves. The results of amino acids in citrus leaves are given in Table 2. The levels of
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 40
Page 11 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
200
most of amino acids generally increased after CLas infection regardless of citrus species. In
201
Hamlin orange leaves, phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, valine, alanine, threonine
202
and glycine in CLas-free leaves were significantly higher than that from CLas-infected leaves.
203
Similarly, CLas infection significantly elevated production of several amino acids in Ray Ruby
204
grapefruit leaves, including leucine, methionine, proline, glutamine, asparagine, arginine and
205
lysine. Only isoleucine and valine of Murcott mandarin leaves significantly increased after CLas
206
infection (Table 2).
207
208
Alterations of flavonoids, coumarins, furanocoumarins and limonoids in citrus leaves by CLas-
209
infection
210
LC-MS was used to identify different classes of flavonoids, including flavanones, flavones and
211
flavonols, in which both flavonoid aglycones and their corresponding glycosides were analyzed
212
in this study. CLas infection increased accumulation of most of flavonoids in Hamlin oranges
213
and Murcott mandarins (Table 3). Levels of naringenin, apigenin, diosmetin, 3,5,6,7,8,3’,4’-
214
heptamethoxyflavone and rutin in Hamlin oranges significantly increased after CLas infection.
215
Similarly, eriocitrin, hesperidin, hesperetin, isosakuranetin, diosmin, diosmetin, nobiletin,
216
tangeretin, rutin and quercetin in CLas-infected Murcott mandarins were significantly higher
217
than that from CLas-free leaves. Conversely, CLas infection decreased accumulation of many
218
flavonoids in Ray Ruby grapefruits, especially flavanones. Levels of neoeriocitrin, narirutin,
219
naringin, didymin, poncirin and isosakuranetin in Ray Ruby grapefruits significantly decreased
220
after CLas-infection. It should be noted that neohesperidin, naringin, poncirin, neodiosmin could
221
be only found in Ray Ruby grapefruits. In coumarins, CLas infection significantly increased
222
scopoletin accumulation in Hamlin oranges. Furanocoumarins are specific groups of secondary 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
223
metabolites commonly present in grapefruits.22 Our results showed that both 6’,7’-
224
epoxybergamottin and bergamottin had higher levels in CLas-free Ray Ruby grapefruits as
225
compared to CLas-infected leaves. Limonin is one of the major limonoids that contribute to the
226
bitterness of citrus fruits.6 Limonin accumulation was significantly elevated in CLas-infected
227
Hamlin oranges (Table 3).
228
229
Multivariate analysis of metabolites
230
First, Venn diagrams were constructed to illustrate the overlapping metabolites significantly
231
altered after CLas infection (Figure 1). In total, CLas infection significantly altered 21, 15 and 26
232
metabolites in Hamlin oranges, Murcott mandarins and Ray Ruby grapefruits, respectively. A
233
total of 6 metabolites, including melibiose, valine, isoleucine, diosmetin, tangeretin and rutin,
234
were significantly altered in both Hamlin oranges and Murcott mandarins after Clas infection,
235
while only two metabolites were significantly changed in both Hamlin oranges and Ray Ruby
236
grapefruits. However, once CLas infected, no metabolites were simultaneously altered in Hamlin
237
oranges, Murcott mandarins and Ray Ruby grapefruits. Similarly, 16 and 14 metabolites
238
significantly accumulated in Hamlin oranges and Murcott mandarins, respectively, while only 9
239
metabolites significantly increased in Ruby Ray grapefruits. It is noteworthy that CLas infection
240
significantly decreased accumulation of 17 metabolites in Ray Ruby grapefruits, while only 5
241
and 1 metabolites in Hamlin oranges and Murcott mandarins significantly decreased (Figure 1).
242
Meanwhile, PLS-DA was employed to determine whether metabolite profiles significantly
243
changed by CLas infection. First, the clusters of Hamlin oranges, Murcott mandarins, and Ray
244
Ruby grapefruits were separated from each other (Figure 2), indicating that metabolite profiles
245
were significantly different depending on the citrus species. R2X, R2Y and Q2 values were 0.907, 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 40
Page 13 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
246
0.982 and 0.800, respectively. Y-intercepts of R2 and Q2 in the permutation test (n=100) were
247
0.719, -0.567, respectively, suggesting a valid model. Importantly, the healthy leaves were
248
clustered together and separated from the CLas-infected leaves in Hamlin oranges, Murcott
249
mandarins and Ray Ruby grapefruits (Figure 2). These results suggest that metabolite profiles of
250
citrus leaves significantly altered after CLas infection regardless of citrus species. To identify the
251
most relevant metabolic pathways involved in metabolic reprogramming after CLas infection,
252
metabolites significantly changed by CLas infection (p