470
Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., Vol. 19, No. 3, 1980
cleavage of the acetylated rearrangement product. Although other pathways are clearly possible for phenol formation and may occur to some extent, our findings strongly support the presence of a pathway similar to that proposed by Bashkirov and coworkers. Acknowledgment The authors wish to acknowledge Robert C. Hayes for laboratory assistance and Robert W. Warren for aid in product identification. Literature Cited
Akad. Nauk SSSR,204, 872 (1972). Hock, H., Lang, S., Chem. Ber., 77, 257 (1944). Howard, J., Korcek, S., Can. J . Chem., 48, 2166 (1970). Shepard, A.. US. Patent 3 244 671 (1966). Walling C., Buckler, S., J . Am. Chem. Soc., 77, 6032 (1955). Zavgorodnil, S.,Russ. Cbem. Rev., 30, 133 (1961).
Applied Research and Development Suntech, Incorporated Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania 19061
Gelbein, A., US. Patent 3 4 9 7 5 6 1 (1970). Grozhan, M., Lapbkli, Yu., Vygodskaya, I., Kamzolkin, V., Bashkirov, A,, Dokl,
James E. Lyons* George Suld Robert W. S h i m Chao-Yang Hsu
Received for review March 27, 1980 Accepted April 15, 1980
CORRECTION Specific Heats of Colorado Oil Shales. A Differential Scanning Calorimetry Study, D. B. Jones, K. Rajeshwar, and J. B. DUBOW, Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Deu. 1980, 19, 125.
Page 127. In Table 11, the heading for the third column instead of b2 X Equation 3 should read bz X should read C, = a3 + b3T + c 3 P + d3Pinstead of C, = a3T + c3P+ d5P.
