Absolute Stereochemistry of Amphidinolide Q - Organic Letters (ACS

Aug 5, 2008 - The absolute configurations at five chiral centers in amphidinolide Q (1), a cytotoxic 12-membered macrolide isolated from a marine ...
0 downloads 0 Views 362KB Size
ORGANIC LETTERS

Absolute Stereochemistry of Amphidinolide Q

2008 Vol. 10, No. 17 3709-3711

Yohei Takahashi,† Takaaki Kubota,† Eri Fukushi,§ Jun Kawabata,§ and Jun’ichi Kobayashi*,† Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido UniVersity, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan, and Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido UniVersity, Sapporo 060-0859, Japan [email protected] Received June 10, 2008

ABSTRACT

The absolute configurations at five chiral centers in amphidinolide Q (1), a cytotoxic 12-membered macrolide isolated from a marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp., were elucidated to be 4R, 7R, 9S, 11R, and 13R on the basis of NMR analyses and a modified Mosher’s method.

Amphidinolides are a series of cytotoxic macrolides possessing unique structural features isolated from laboratory cultured marine dinoflagellates Amphidinium sp.1 Amphidinolide Q (1) isolated from a dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. (Y-5 strain) is a cytotoxic 12-membered macrolide having C1 branches at vicinal carbons (C-13 and C-14) and an R,βunsaturated ester moiety.2 The gross structure of 1 has been elucidated by 2D NMR, whereas the stereochemistry remains unsolved due to lack of sample.2 Quite recently, we could reisolate amphidinolide Q (1) from the same strain so that this sample was used to elucidate the stereochemistry of 1. Here, we describe the elucidation of the absolute configurations at five chiral centers in 1 on the basis of the NMR analysis and a modified Mosher’s method. The relative stereochemistry for amphidinolide Q (1) was elucidated on the basis of the J-based configuration analysis

(JBCA) method3 and NOESY correlations. The geminal, vicinal, and long-range J(C,H) coupling constants were obtained by the resolution-enhanced 1H spectrum, the HETLOC,4 and J-IMPEACH-MBC5 spectra in C6D6. A small value for 3J(H-4/H-5a) and a large value for 2J(H-5b/C-4) indicated that H-4/H-5a and 4-OH/H-5b were both gauche (Figure 1). A middle value for 3J(H-4/H-5b) suggested that



Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Graduate School of Agriculture. (1) (a) Kobayashi, J.; Kubota, T. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 451–460. (b) Kobayashi, J. J. Antibiot. 2008, 61, 271–284. (c) Takahashi, Y.; Kubota, T.; Kobayashi, J. J. Antibiot. 2007, 60, 376–379. (d) Oguchi, K.; Tsuda, M.; Iwamoto, R.; Okamoto, Y.; Kobayashi, J.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J.; Ozawa, T.; Masuda, A.; Kitaya, Y.; Omasa, K. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1567–1570. (2) Kobayashi, J.; Takahashi, M.; Ishibashi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1449–1450. §

10.1021/ol8013123 CCC: $40.75 Published on Web 08/05/2008

 2008 American Chemical Society

Figure 1. Rotation models for the C-4/C-5 bond of amphidinolide Q (1).

the C-4/C-5 bond existed as two conformers, while NOESY correlations for H-4/H-5a, H-4/H-5b, and H-5a/H3-17 in C6D6 indicated that the C-4/C-5 bond existed mainly as a

conformer with gauche relationships for C-3/H-5a and H-4/ H-5b. The relative stereochemistry of the C-7 to C-11 moiety in 1 was deduced from analyses of the HETLOC, JIMPEACH-MBC, and NOESY spectra in C6D6. The middle values for 3J(H-7/H-8b) and 3J(H-9/H-10a) indicated that C-7/C-8 and C-9/C-10 bonds adapted two conformers, while NOESY cross-peaks of H-7/H-9, H-8a/H-10a, H-9/H-11, and H-10b/H3-19 as well as small J-values for H-7/H-8a, H-8b/ C-6, H-9/H-10b, and H-10a/C-19 allowed us to assign the major confomer for C-7/C-9 and C-9/C-10 bonds as shown in Figure 2a and 2c, respectively. NOESY correlations for

10a), 3J(H-11/H-10b), and 2J(H-10b/C-11) revealed that C-8/ C-9 and C-10/C-11 bonds existed as a single conformer as shown in Figure 2b and 2d, respectively. Relative configurations at C-4 and C-7 were deduced from NOESY correlations for H-2/H-8a, H3-17/H-5a, H-4/H2-5, and H-5a/H-7 for 1 as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Selected NOESY correlations and relative stereochemistry for the C-2∼C-11 portion of amphidinolide Q (1).

The relationship of C-11 and C-13 could not be deduced from the JBCA method due to the overlapping of signals for H-12a and H-12b in C6D6, whereas these signals were slightly separated in CDCl3. A small value for 3J(H-11/H12a) and a large value for 3J(H-11/H-12b) suggested a gauche relationship of H-11/H-12a and an anti relationship for H-11/H-12b, respectively. In addition, an anti relationship of H-12a/11-O deduced from a small J-value of H-12a/C11 and NOESY correlations for H-11/H-12a and H-11/H13 revealed that the C-11/C-12 bond existed as a single conformer as shown in Figure 4a. On the other hand, NOESY

Figure 2. Rotation models for (a) C-7/C-8, (b) C-8/C-9, (c) C-9/ C-10, and (d) C-10/C-11 bonds of amphidinolide Q (1).

H-7/H-9, H-8a/H-10a, H-9/H-11, and H-10b/H-11 and values for 3J(H-9/H-8a), 3J(H-9/H-8b), 3J(H-8a/C-19), 3J(H-11/H-

Figure 4. Rotation models for (a) C-11/C-12 and (b) C-12/C-13 bonds of amphidinolide Q (1).

(3) Matsumori, N.; Kaneno, D.; Murata, M.; Nakamura, H.; Tachibana, K. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 866–876. (4) (a) Otting, G.; Wu¨thrich, K. Q. ReV. Biophys. 1990, 23, 39–96. (b) Wollborn, U.; Leibfritz, D. J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 98, 142–146. (c) Kurz, M.; Schmieder, P.; Kessler, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1329– 1331. (5) Williamson, R. T.; Marquez, B. L.; Gerwick, W. H.; Martin, G. E.; Krishnamurthy, V. V. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2001, 39, 127–132.

cross-peaks of H-11/H-13, H-12a/H-21a, and H-12b/H3-20 as well as the large value for 3J(H-13/H-12a) and middle values for 3J(H-13/H-12b) and 3J(H-12a/C-20) indicated that the C-12/C-13 bond existed as a pair of two conformers as shown in Figure 4b.

3710

Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 17, 2008

The molecular mechanics calculations of 1 were carried out by using Sybyl 6.5 (MMFF94 force-field).6 One of the most stable confomers explained well the NOESY correations observed for 1 (Figure 5). Thus, the relative stereochemistry of amphidinolide Q (1) was elucidated as shown.

Figure 6. ∆δ values [∆δ (in ppm) ) δS - δR] obtained for the (S)- and (R)-MTPA esters (2a and 2b, respectively) of amphidinolide Q (1).

mixture of two linear methyl esters generated by dehydration of C-4 and C-5 and epimerization of C-7. The mixture was treated with (R)- and (S)- MTPACl, and the resulting bis(S)- and (R)-MTPA esters were obtained by HPLC purification. ∆δ values for 3a and 3b suggested the absolute configuration at C-11 to be R (Figure 7). Thus, the absolute configurations at the five chiral centers in 1 were concluded to be 4R, 7R, 9S, 11R, and 13R, respectively. Figure 5. Selected NOESY correlations and a stable conformer for macrolactone ring of amphidinolide Q (1) obtained from the molecular mechanics calculations (hydrogen atoms of methyl groups were omitted).

To elucidate the absolute configurations of amphidinolide Q (1), a modified Mosher’s method7 was applied as follows. Treatment of 1 with (R)-(-)- and (S)-(+)-2-methoxy-2trifluoro-2-phenylacetyl chloride (MTPACl) gave the (S)- and (R)-MTPA esters (2a and 2b, respectively) of 1. ∆δ values (∆δ ) δS - δR) obtained from 1H NMR data of 2a and 2b are shown in Figure 6. The ∆δ values for H2-5 and H3-18 are positive, while negative ∆δ values are observed for H-2, H2-10, H-13, H3-16, H3-17, H3-19, H3-20, and H2-21.8 These results indicated that the absolute configuration at C-4 was R. The relative stereochemistry of 1 was elucidated as described above, while the absolute configuration at C-11 was elucidated directly by application of a modified Mosher method to the linear methyl ester derivatives of amphidinolide Q (1). Treatment of 1 with K2CO3 in MeOH yielded a (6) Halgren, T. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7827–7643. (7) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4092–4095. (8) A positive ∆δ value for H-11 seems to be due to the anisotropic effect of the ester carbonyl group at C-1.

Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 17, 2008

Figure 7. ∆δ values [∆δ (in ppm) ) δS - δR] obtained for the (S)- and (R)-MTPA esters (3a and 3b, respectively) of the linear methyl ester derivatives of amphidinolide Q (1).

Acknowledgment. The authors thank Ms. S. Oka, Center for Instrumental Analysis, Hokkaido University, for measurements of ESIMS. This work was partly supported by grants from a Takeda Science Foundation, a Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and one- and two-dimensional NMR spectra for 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. OL8013123

3711