Acute Responses of Microorganisms from Membrane Bioreactors in

Mar 6, 2017 - Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are key foulants in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). However, their positive functions of protectin...
0 downloads 13 Views 917KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Eastern Michigan University | Bruce T. Halle Library

Article

Acute Responses of Microorganisms from MBR in the Presence of NaOCl: Protective Mechanisms of Extracellular Polymeric Substances Xiaomeng Han, Zhiwei Wang, Mei Chen, Xingran Zhang, Chuyang Y. Tang, and Zhichao Wu Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05475 • Publication Date (Web): 06 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 7, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Acute Responses of Microorganisms from MBR in the Presence of

2

NaOCl:

3

Substances

Protective

Mechanisms

of

Extracellular

Polymeric

4 5

Xiaomeng Han1,3, Zhiwei Wang*,1, Mei Chen1, Xingran Zhang1, Chuyang Y. Tang2, Zhichao

6

Wu1

7 8

1

9

Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental

10

2

11

China

12

3

13

Center Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China

Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong,

Shanghai Urban Water Resources Development and Utilization National Engineering

14 15 16 17

Revised Manuscript Submitted to: Environmental Science & Technology (clean version)

18

March 3, 2017

19 20 21 22 23 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

24

ABSTRACT

25

Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are key foulants in membrane bioreactors (MBRs).

26

On the other hand, their positive functions of protecting microorganisms from

27

environmental stresses, e.g., during in-situ hypochlorite chemical cleaning of membranes,

28

have not been adequately elucidated. In this work, we investigated the response of

29

microorganisms in an MBR to various dosages of NaOCl, with a particular emphasis on the

30

mechanistic roles of EPS. Results showed that functional groups in EPS such as the

31

hydroxyl and amino groups were attacked by NaOCl, causing the oxidation of

32

polysaccharides, denaturation of amino acids, damage to protein secondary structure, and

33

transformation of tryptophan protein-like substances to condensed aromatic ring substances.

34

The presence of EPS alleviated the negative impacts on catalase and superoxide dismutase,

35

which in turn reduced the concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in microbial cells.

36

The direct extracellular reaction and the mitigated intracellular oxidative responses

37

facilitated the maintenance of microbial metabolism, as indicated by the quantity of

38

adenosine triphosphate and the activity of dehydrogenase. The reaction with NaOCl also led

39

to the changes of cell integrity and adhesion properties of EPS, which promoted the release

40

of organic matter into bulk solution. Our results systematically demonstrate the protective

41

roles of EPS and the underlying mechanisms in resisting the environmental stress caused by

42

NaOCl, which provides important implications for in-situ chemical cleaning in MBRs.

43 44 45

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

46

INTRODUCTION

47

In membrane bioreactors (MBRs), fouling due to the adsorption/accumulation of

48

extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on membranes is a critical issue affecting MBR

49

performance.1 Controlling EPS-related biofouling in MBRs has been a hot topic in past

50

decades.2,3 Meanwhile, EPS are important for microorganisms in activated sludge processes

51

as they can mediate cell-cell interactions, promote structural development of flocs, and

52

serve as carbon/energy sources in starvation.4-6 It has been reported that EPS also play an

53

important role in protecting cells against environmental stresses, e.g., desiccation and in the

54

presence of heavy metals and antibiotics.7-10

55

In the context of MBRs, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is a widely used reagent for

56

in-situ chemical cleaning of membranes to restore their permeability11-13. Microbial cells are

57

inevitably exposed to NaOCl during this cleaning process. We hypothesize that EPS

58

function as a protective layer to alleviate the adverse impacts of NaOCl on microbial

59

viability. Furthermore, the mechanisms involved in EPS protection might be related to the

60

interaction of EPS with NaOCl since EPS have abundant hydroxyls, carbonyls, and amine

61

groups14,15 that can be attacked by NaOCl.5 However, there is an obvious lack of studies

62

investigating the role of EPS in protecting microorganisms during membrane cleaning in

63

MBRs.

64

Previous studies on biofilm formation show that EPS produced by microorganisms

65

significantly increase the tolerance of biofilm or pure bacteria strains to antibiotics and

66

disinfectants.16-18 Mechanisms of EPS protection for biofilm include transport limitation of

67

biocides through EPS matrix, sacrificial reaction of EPS with biocides, formation of a 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

68

nutrient gradient within biofilm leading to complex phenotypes of cells, and change of

69

biofilm structure.5 Xue et al. further reported that capsular EPS of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

70

either acted as a disinfectant consumer (for chlorine inactivation) or limited access to

71

reactive sites on cell membrane (for monochloramine inactivation) via deformation of key

72

functional groups in EPS and cell membrane.19 Similarly, EPS content was observed to be

73

reduced in biofilm in the presence of ozone due to its reaction with EPS. 20 Ozone can attack

74

amino acid residue on polypeptide chain of proteins and decrease the molecular weight of

75

polysaccharides and proteins. 21 It has been also reported that EPS can bind heavy metals

76

(e.g., Cu2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+) or reduce high-oxidation-state metals (e.g., U6+ and Cr6+),

77

hindering their intracellular penetration.22-24

78

Although the recent research16-19,22-24 on the role of EPS in biofilm tolerance and heavy

79

metal binding/remediation has laid the groundwork for understanding EPS-NaOCl

80

interactions, the detailed protective mechanisms of EPS for microorganisms from MBRs in

81

the presence of NaOCl remain to be established. Currently, no systematic study has been

82

conducted to illustrate the role of EPS in protecting microorganisms during membrane

83

cleaning. In addition, the acute responses of microorganisms may lead to the change of

84

metabolism behaviors and release of organic matters into mixed liquor, causing the

85

deterioration of MBR performance and increase of membrane fouling rate. Investigation on

86

the microbial stress responses and protective mechanisms of EPS is essential to recognizing

87

the impacts of chemical cleaning on microorganisms and optimizing MBR performance

88

during/after cleaning.

89

Therefore, in the present work, we aim to elucidate the role of EPS in microbial stress 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 35

Page 5 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

90

responses to NaOCl application in an MBR. Specifically, this study investigated (i) the

91

effect of NaOCl stress on microbial metabolism behaviors using microbial cells with and

92

without EPS; (ii) the protective role of EPS in microbial stress responses by examining

93

deformation of EPS’s functional groups and generation of intracellular reactive oxygen

94

species (ROS); and (iii) the adhesion and release behaviors of EPS after exposure to NaOCl.

95 96

MATERIALS AND METHODS

97

Reagents. All chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade unless stated

98

otherwise. Sodium sulfite, sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, chloride acid and sodium

99

hypochlorite (~6%) were received from Aladdin (China). Calcein-AM (CAM) and

100

propidium iodide (PI) were purchased from AAT Bioquest, USA. All solutions were

101

prepared using deionized (DI) water. Solution pH was adjusted by adding 1 M NaOH or 1

102

M HCl where applicable. Catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) assay kits were

103

purchased from Cayman Chemical (MI, USA).

104

Microorganism samples. Microorganism samples were collected from a lab-scale

105

anoxic/oxic MBR treating real municipal wastewater. Detailed information about the MBR

106

can be found in Supporting Information (SI) Section S1. The microbial community was

107

analyzed during the period of sampling, which is shown in Figure S1 with the analytical

108

procedure documented in SI Section S2.

109

Microorganisms collected from the MBR were washed and centrifuged twice (4000 g,

110

10 min) to remove the supernatant. The remaining microorganisms were re-suspended in DI

111

water. The prepared microorganisms were denoted as original ones, i.e., ORI. ORI 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

112

microorganisms with pre-determined volume were subject to EPS extraction25 with detailed

113

procedures described in SI Section S3. The quantity and compositions of extracted EPS are

114

listed in Table S1. The microorganisms after the removal of EPS were named as removed

115

ones, i.e., REM. Both ORI and REM microorganisms were exposed to NaOCl solutions.

116

The NaOCl dosages of 0-0.67 mmol/g-SS were chosen based on the typical dosages applied

117

during chemical cleaning in MBRs.26 An exposure duration of 2 h was used to simulate a

118

shock load of NaOCl and to facilitate the evaluation of the acute responses of

119

microorganisms.

120

Microbial metabolism behaviors. Dehydrogenase (DHA) activity and adenosine

121

triphosphate (ATP) quantity were measured for ORI and REM since DHA and ATP can well

122

reflect heterotrophic metabolism behaviors.11,27,28 Detailed measurement procedures for

123

DHA and ATP can be found in SI Section S3.

124

For confirming the heterotrophic metabolism behaviors affected by NaOCl,

125

biodegradation of sodium acetate (NaAc) by ORI and REM was performed. Briefly, ORI

126

and REM samples were transferred into magnetically agitated reaction vessels, and

127

pre-weighted amount of NaAc was dosed to make an initial NaAc concentration of 850

128

mg/L. Dissolved oxygen concentration was maintained at about 5 mg/L during the

129

experiment. Mixed liquor samples, collected from the vessels at pre-determined durations (0,

130

20, 40, 60, 90, 120 min), were centrifuged (8000g, 5 min) and filtered (0.45-µm PTFE

131

membrane) prior to TOC analyses (TOC-LCPH, Shimadzu, Japan). Nitrification and

132

denitrification tests were also performed for ORI and REM based on the protocols reported

133

elsewhere.11 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

134

Evaluation of the deformation of EPS’s functional groups and the generation of

135

intracellular reactive oxygen species. The extracted EPS were subject to reaction with the

136

same dosages of NaOCl as described above. The ionic strength of the solutions was adjusted

137

to 15.4 mM to eliminate the impacts of ionic strength. After reaction at pre-determined

138

durations (0, 30, 60, 90, 120 min), samples were collected and subject to combined

139

spectroscopy

140

fluorescence spectroscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).29,30 The

141

analytical procedures are described in SI Section S4. The degree of acetylation due to the

142

replacement of hydroxyl by acetyl group is characterized by 100×A1665/(1.33×A3450).31,32

143

Dynamic light scattering was employed to identify the changes in the hydrodynamic

144

diameter of EPS.33

analyses,

i.e.,

three-dimensional

excitation-emission

matrix

(EEM)

145

ROS are normally generated from sequential univalent reductions of oxygen during

146

oxidative phosphorylation, resulting in generation of ROS including superoxide anion (O2●-),

147

hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radicals (●OH).34 Cells are equipped with enzymes

148

including catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and other antioxidants to maintain a

149

balance between the production and elimination of ROS.35 However, the presence/diffusion

150

of NaOCl into microbial cells might cause damage to key enzymes, leading to deleterious

151

oxidative stress. Production of ROS was detected by a detection kit36 (H2DCF-DA,

152

Life-Technologies, USA). Briefly, H2DCF-DA was added into ORI and REM and incubated

153

for 20 min at 37oC. The residual probes were removed by centrifugation and washing using

154

DI water. NaOCl was then added into ORI and REM, and the intracellular ROS was

155

measured by a multi-mode microplate reader (Excitation/Emission wavelength = 488 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

156

nm/525 nm, Synergy-4, Bio-Tek, USA). CAT and SOD, capable of mitigating ROS, were

157

measured by CAT and SOD assay kits, respectively.

158

Cell integrity and organic matter release upon exposure to NaOCl. Cell integrity

159

tests were performed by a double staining method37 using calcein-AM (CAM) (for live cells)

160

and propidium iodide (PI) (for dead cells). The analytical procedures are documented in SI

161

Section S5.

162

EPS release was evaluated for ORI during the 2-h exposure to NaOCl. Samples were

163

periodically collected and pre-weighted amount of sodium sulfite was added to quench the

164

residue NaOCl. The samples were then centrifuged (8000g, 5 min) and the supernatant was

165

filtered by 0.45-µm PTFE membrane before TOC analyses. DNA was also monitored for

166

verifying whether the release of intracellular substances occurred, since a dramatic increase

167

of DNA can indicate cell lysis and intracellular component release.38

168

QCM-D analysis33 was performed to elucidate the adhesion behaviors of EPS after

169

exposure to NaOCl. Deionized water was initially injected into QCM-D (E4, Q-sense,

170

Sweden) for stabilization (frequency drift