Aggregation, Dissolution, and Transformation of Copper Nanoparticles

Feb 9, 2015 - Copper-based nanomaterials for environmental decontamination – An overview on technical and toxicological aspects. Mohammadreza Khalaj...
1 downloads 14 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by NEW YORK UNIV

Article

Aggregation, dissolution and transformation of copper nanoparticles in natural waters Jon Robert Conway, Adeyemi S. Adeleye, Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey, and Arturo A. Keller Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es504918q • Publication Date (Web): 09 Feb 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 11, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Aggregation, dissolution and transformation of

2

copper nanoparticles in natural waters

3

Jon R. Conway1,3, Adeyemi S. Adeleye1,3, Jorge Gardea-Torresdey2,3, Arturo A. Keller1,3,*

4

1

Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa

5

Barbara, CA 93106 2

6

7

3

Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968

University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC

8

CEIN), USA

9

10

ABSTRACT

11

Time-dependent aggregation, sedimentation, dissolution and transformation of three copper-

12

based engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) of varied properties were measured in eight natural and

13

artificial waters. Nano-Cu and Cu(OH)2 aggregated rapidly to >103 nm while the aggregate size

14

of nano-CuO averaged between 250 to 400 nm. Aggregate size for both nano-Cu and nano-CuO

15

showed a positive correlation with ionic strength with a few exceptions. Aggregate size did not

16

correlate well with sedimentation rate, suggesting sedimentation was influenced by other factors.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 26

17

Controlling factors in sedimentation rates varied by particle: Cu(OH)2 particles remained stable

18

in all waters but groundwater, nano-Cu was generally unstable except in waters with high

19

organic content, and nano-CuO was stabilized by the presence of phosphate, which reversed

20

surface charge polarity at concentrations as low as 0.1 mg PO43- L-1. Dissolution generally

21

correlated with pH, although in saline waters dissolved copper formed insoluble complexes.

22

Nano-Cu was rapidly oxidized, resulting in dissolution immediately followed by the formation of

23

precipitates. These results suggest factors including phosphate, carbonate, and ENM oxidation

24

state may be key in determining Cu ENM behavior in natural waters.

25 26

TEXT

27

1. Introduction

28

Although copper-based engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) currently comprise a relatively

29

small fraction of global ENM production (~200 metric tons per year as of 2010),1 their toxicity

30

and life cycle characteristics raise concerns regarding their environmental risk. For example, a

31

common use for Cu-based ENMs is as the active ingredient in marine anti-fouling paints or

32

agricultural biocides2, where they are directly introduced into the environment as intentionally

33

toxic substances. Copper-based ENMs are somewhat unique amongst the most widely-used

34

ENMs in that they can participate in redox reactions to form three oxidation states: Cu0, Cu1+,

35

and Cu2+. Copper can also participate in a number of inorganic complexes with compounds

36

found in natural waters, such as sulfate, sulfide, phosphate, chloride, and carbonate. The

37

behavior of different Cu species in the environment is not well understood, and the formation of

38

these various complexes may cause precipitation of ionic copper and alter the surface charge and

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

39

therefore aggregation and dissolution kinetics of nanoparticulate copper. Solubility for the

40

copper-based ENMs tested in this study have been seen to be enhanced at low pH and by the

41

presence of organic coatings in previous research3. Additionally, several copper nanomaterials

42

including Cu2O and CuO have been shown to possess photocatalytic properties,4-6 which may

43

pose greater hazard to organisms if suspended in photic surface waters than if sedimented into

44

aphotic sediments.

45

Size,7 coating,8 solubility,9 and photoactivity10, 11 have all been implicated as playing roles in

46

ENM toxicity, and are all affected by water chemistry. Aggregate size (and consequently,

47

sedimentation rate) is influenced by ionic strength (IS) and pH via charge regulation,12,

48

whereby the effective repulsive surface charge of the ENMs is decreased through ionic shielding

49

and surface de/protonation. Depending on their composition, organic surface coatings can

50

stabilize14,

51

interactions between organisms and ENMs.16, 17 Previous research has shown that copper-based

52

ENMs are toxic to a wide range of organisms, including fungi,18 aquatic19 and terrestrial plants,20

53

estuarine amphipods,21 daphnids and protozoa,22 marine worms and clams,23 and mussels.24 It is

54

therefore necessary to develop our understanding of how these materials behave once released

55

into the environment in order to predict at risk populations and properly regulate their

56

manufacture, use, and disposal.

15

13

or destabilize8 particles in suspension, and through the same mechanisms alter

57

In this study, the physiochemical behaviors of three different species of Cu-based ENMs were

58

quantified in eight natural and artificial waters covering a range of IS, pH, and organic content to

59

gain insight into how these particles may behave in the environment. Additionally, equilibrium

60

speciation modeling was performed to predict transformations of the Cu ENMs. Based on

61

previous work, we hypothesized that aggregation would largely be controlled by the IS of the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 26

62

water, with more saline waters having greater aggregation due to surface charge shielding, and

63

by the presence of dissolved organic matter that will increase electrostatic and steric repulsion

64

between particles. Due to the propensity for larger, heavier aggregates to settle more rapidly, we

65

hypothesized that sedimentation would be directly related to aggregation kinetics and hence

66

controlled by IS and total organic content (TOC). We hypothesized that pH would be the key

67

factor in dissolution with more dissolution occurring at lower pH and that the presence of TOC

68

would also cause a small amount of dissolution. Additionally, we hypothesized that nano-Cu (as

69

Cu0) would have the greatest dissolution in oxic waters as it oxidized to Cu2+.

70

2. Methods

71

2.1. Characterization (Particles and waters)

72

Three particles were used this study: nano-Cu (Sigma Aldrich), nano-CuO (US Research

73

Nanomaterials), and Cu(OH)2 particles in the form of the commercial biocide Kocide 3000

74

(Dupont). A full characterization of the particles can be found in Adeleye et al (2014)3 and the

75

Supplementary Information for this paper (Figures S1-S7), and a summary is provided in Table

76

1. Briefly, the nano-Cu and nano-CuO ENMs were in the form of a high purity powder with

77

primary particle sizes of 100-1000 and 20-100 nm, respectively. Kocide 3000 is composed of

78

spherical composites on the order of 50 μm made up of irregular nano- to micro-scale Cu(OH)2

79

particles embedded in a primarily carbon-based matrix that rapidly breaks down in water to

80

release the Cu(OH)2 particles. These can be seen in the inset of Figure S1. Kocide 3000 was

81

chosen as a representative of commercially available nano-copper containing biocides, which

82

often contain other ingredients like dispersants.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

83

Properties of the five natural and three artificial waters used here can be found in Table 2, and

84

details on collection and preparation can be found in the Supplementary Information. Total

85

organic carbon (TOC) content of the eight waters was determined using a Shimadzu TOC 5000

86

analyzer. Conductivity was measured with a Traceable bench conductivity meter (Fisher

87

Scientific) and pH was measured using a HACH HQ 40d portable meter. Elemental contents of

88

water samples were quantified via ICP-AES (iCAP 6300, Thermo Scientific) except for Cl,

89

which was measured with a chloride test kit (Hanna Instruments), and bicarbonate, which was

90

measured with an alkalinity titration kit (LaMotte). Detection limits for TOC and PO43- were

91

0.004 and 0.02 mg L-1, respectively, and the detection limit for Al, Cu, and Fe was 0.05 mg L-1.

92

Ionic strength was calculated from the concentration of Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+, HCO3-, SO42-, and

93

Cl- using Equation 1.

94

 =  ∙ ∑   ∙ 

95

Where I is the ionic strength in mM, ci is the concentration of the ith species in mM, and Z2i is

96



Eq. 1

the oxidation number of the ith species.

97

2.2. Physicochemical kinetics

98

Aggregation kinetics of Cu-based ENMs were measured by preparing 10 mg L-1 ENM

99

suspensions in each water through dilution of a 100 mg L-1 stock, probe sonicating for 2 sec at

100

20% amplitude (sufficient to disperse aggregates) with a Misonix Sonicator S-4000 (QSonica

101

LLC, Newtown, CT), then measuring size trends over time at 20oC via dynamic light scattering

102

(DLS, Zetasizer Nano ZS-90, Malvern Instruments). Measurements were taken every 30 sec for

103

1 h. To measure sedimentation over time, the optical absorbency (Shimadzu 1601 UV-Vis

104

spectrophotometer) of suspensions identical to those described above were determined in

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 26

105

triplicate every 6 min for 6 h at 320 nm with the exception of nano-Cu in lagoon water, seawater,

106

and diluted seawater, which were measured at 520 nm at a concentration of 20 mg L-1. Nano-Cu

107

is the only of the three particles where copper is primarily in the zero valent state, and as such it

108

is able to participate in unique chemical reactions prior to oxidation to the 1+ and 2+ states. One

109

of these is the temporary formation of copper (I) chloride compounds in saline waters (Figure

110

S4), which absorbs strongly at 320 nm, the spectral wavelength that was used to detect solid

111

copper. To test the effects of phosphate on nano-CuO, the sedimentation rates, ζ-potential (DLS,

112

Zetasizer Nano ZS-90, Malvern Instruments), and pH of 10 mg L-1 nano-CuO in Nanopure water

113

with the addition of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg PO43- L-1 (from NaH2PO4) were measured in

114

triplicate.

115

To measure dissolution ENM suspensions were prepared and stored at room temperature for 0,

116

1, 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, or 90 days, at which point they were transferred to Amicon® Ultra-4 10 kDa

117

centrifugal filter tubes (maximum pore size ~3 nm, Millipore, Ireland) and centrifuged (Sorvall

118

RC 5B Plus, CT) at 4000 x g for 40 min with a swinging bucket rotor. Filter retention was

119

insignificant.25 The filtrate was analyzed using a copper ion selective electrode (ISE, Cole

120

Parmer, IL) under consistent lighting conditions to minimize light-induced interference. The

121

filtrate was then oxidized with 1.2 vol% HNO3 and 0.9 vol% H2O2 and analyzed for total copper

122

content via inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, iCAP 6300

123

Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), with a detection limit of 50 µg L-1. Standard solutions were

124

measured every 15 samples for quality assurance.

125

Two parameters related to dissolution were quantified: dissolved copper ([Cu]dis) – the total

126

copper content of the ENMs present as free ions (Cu1+ and Cu2+), and aqueous phase copper

127

([Cu]aq) – the total copper content of the ENMs in the filtrate, which includes dissolved copper,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

128

complexed copper (e.g., CuCl, CuCO3, Cu3(PO4)2, etc.), and copper bound by ligands under 10

129

kDa. The ISE that was used to detect free ionic copper was capable of detecting both Cu1+ and

130

Cu2+, both of which may have been shed by the nano-Cu ENMs, but since Cu1+ undergoes rapid

131

disproportionation26 into Cu(0) and Cu2+ (E0cell = +0.37V) and is readily oxidized to Cu2+ in oxic

132

water (E0cell = +1.08V) it is unlikely to be present as a free ion in any significant amount. Visual

133

MINTEQ (v3.0) was used to predict speciation and complex formation in the natural waters

134

based on the parameters given in Table 2. Additional information on model parameters can be

135

found in the Supplementary Information.

136

2.3 Statistical analyses

137

To determine the effect of water type on aggregate size, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis

138

tests with post-hoc Tukey’s or multiple comparisons were performed. To verify the effect of time

139

linear models were fitted to each aggregation trend. All analyses were performed in Excel

140

(Microsoft Office 2010) or RStudio (0.96.316).

141

3. Results & Discussion

142

3.1. Aggregation kinetics

143

Aggregation of nano-Cu and Cu(OH)2 particles (Figure 1) was characterized by three phases in

144

the 1 h time period measured: 1) immediate aggregation to roughly 5-10 µm in the first few

145

seconds post-sonication; 2) a downward trend in aggregate size from 0-10 min that was likely

146

due to sedimentation of the largest aggregates out of the water column; 3) a stable phase in

147

which aggregate diameters averaged 700-2000 nm. Aggregation of nano-Cu and nano-CuO

148

followed the trends outlined in our hypothesis (i.e., enhanced aggregation at high IS and low

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

7

Environmental Science & Technology

149

TOC) with a few instructive exceptions discussed below, but Cu(OH)2 had similar aggregation

150

behaviors in all waters.

Page 8 of 26

151

The polydispersity indices (PDIs) reported from the DLS analysis for Cu(OH)2 and nano-Cu

152

were near the arbitrary cutoff value of 1 at all time points in all waters, indicating very broad size

153

distributions. Average aggregate size and statistical groupings for all three ENMs can be found

154

in Table 3. Average Cu(OH)2 aggregate size in the third phase did not vary significantly with

155

water type (ANOVA, F7,803 = 0.854, p > 0.5), which may be due to the large proportion (>70

156

wt%) of dispersants and other non-Cu ingredients in Kocide 3000. However, despite its high

157

polydispersity nano-Cu aggregate size correlated significantly with water type (Kruskal-Wallis,

158

H = 149.3, 7 d.f., p