An Effective Approach for Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Nickel

Publication Date (Web): October 16, 2018 ... limitations such as lower stability of the polymer under reservoir conditions hinder the efficiency of th...
0 downloads 0 Views 583KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE

Fossil Fuels

An Effective Approach for Enhanced Oil Recovery using Nickel Nanoparticles Assisted Polymer Flooding Sandeep Rellegadla, Himanshu Kumar Bairwa, Mankamna R Kumari, Ganshyam Prajapat, Surendra Nimesh, Nidhi Pareek, SHIKHA JAIN, and Akhil Agrawal Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02356 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 19, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

An Effective Approach for Enhanced Oil Recovery using Nickel

2

Nanoparticles Assisted Polymer Flooding

3

Sandeep Rellegadlaa, Himanshu K. Bairwaa, Mankamna R. Kumarib, Ganshyam Prajapata,

4

Surendra Nimeshb, Nidhi Pareeka, Shikha Jainc, and Akhil Agrawala*

5 6

aEnergy

7

of Rajasthan, NH-8, Bandersindri, Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India

8

bDepartment

9

Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India

10

and Environment Research Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Central University

cDepartment

of Biotechnology, Central University of Rajasthan, NH-8, Bandersindri,

of Chemistry, Manipal University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

11 12

ABSTRACT

13

The addition of polymer to injection fluid increase the crude oil recovery by improved sweep

14

efficiency. Although it is the most widely used method for chemical enhanced oil recovery

15

(CEOR) but limitations such as lower stability of polymer in reservoir conditions, hinder the

16

efficiency of the process. In the current study, a novel nanoparticle assisted polymer flooding

17

approach was carried out to overcome these limitations. To determine whether nanoparticles

18

influences the displacement efficiency of the injected fluid we used a blend of xanthan gum and

19

nickel nanoparticles. We have evaluated the changes in the dilute solution viscosity of xanthan

20

when the nickel nanoparticles are added and have found out that xanthan-nickel nanoparticles

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 35

21

mixture has a higher intrinsic viscosity of 55.25 dl/gm compared to 49.13 dl/gm for the gum

22

solution. Efficiency of nanoparticle assisted polymer flooding was evaluated in sand packed

23

bioreactors with ~0.6 PV of residual oil in place (ROIP). Flooding results demonstrated the

24

highest recovery of 5.98% of additional ROIP with xanthan-nickel nanoparticle mixture

25

compared to 4.48 and 4.58% of ROIP during the separate flooding of xanthan and nanoparticles

26

respectively. Results suggested the novel nanoparticle assisted polymer flooding approach is able

27

to increase oil recovery beyond available methods.

28

Keywords

29

Nanoparticles, Polymer flooding, Xanthan gum, Enhanced oil recovery

30

1. Introduction

31

Application of nanoparticles is emerging in the field of oil production

32

shown nanoparticles as good in-situ agents for increasing the efficiency of oil recovery

33

12-15.

34

process. Primary recovery uses the resident geological pressure for producing oil. As pressure

35

depletes, the process of secondary recovery is done by water flooding. Water flooding re-

36

pressurize the reservoirs and sweeps the oil towards production well

37

efficiency of recovering oil due to decreasing oil to water ratio. Tertiary processes, also known

38

as enhanced oil recovery (EOR), are implemented when oil to water ratio decreases below a

39

profitable limit. Chemical EOR (CEOR) is one such widely used tertiary process employing

40

polymers, surfactants or solvents for oil recovery 16-19. The ability of nanoparticles to alter certain

41

factors in the reservoir formation as well as oil properties, add up to the advantage of recovering

1-11.

Recent trends have 2,5,6,8 and

Basically, oil is recovered by three different processes; primary, secondary and tertiary

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

16.

It eventually loses its

Page 3 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

15, 19-20.

42

oil and could be studied widely as a process of CEOR

43

particles into formations and studying their role in EOR.

44

The use of nanoparticles in the field of oil recovery has been reported by several authors. These

45

investigators concluded that the increase in EOR was due to a number of properties of

46

nanoparticles like high sedimentation and thermal stability, altered rheological and magnetic

47

properties 4. These properties strongly depend on the size and shape of the nanoparticles and can

48

be altered during synthesis. More specifically, the use of nanoparticles changes the rock

49

wettability 21, increase the mobility of capillary trapped oil 22, lowers interfacial tension (IFT) 23

50

and also brings about a change in the flow characteristics from a Newtonian fluid to a Non-

51

newtonian fluid 7. Karimi et al. 2012, reported that there is an increase in efficiency of oil

52

recovery with the use of nanofluids, primarily because of wettability alteration of the carbonate

53

rocks from strongly oil-wet to water-wet 24. Besides, it was noted by Babadagli et al. 2002, that

54

the reduction in the IFT between the aqueous phase and the oil phase resulted in the faster and

55

greater recovery of the oil

56

capillary imbibition as an oil recovery mechanism using different surfactants and polymer

57

solutions. Capillary imbibition usually occurs in naturally fractured reservoirs if the rock matrix

58

is water wet with enough water present in contact. It is the spontaneous suction of water by a

59

rock matrix which simultaneously expels the oil during the process 26. However, heavy oil rock

60

matrix and high IFT, lowers the permeability and limits contact. This in turn lowers recovery

61

potential by capillary imbibition. Addition of nanoparticles may change these dynamics by

62

lowering IFT and altering the wettability of the rock matrix. Several experiments demonstrating

63

the flow behavior of nanoparticle suspensions through a porous medium have also been

64

investigated

27 - 29.

25.

This involves introducing these

They investigated the responsible factor, i.e. decreasing IFT, by

Kanz et al. 2009, have suggested that one may adopt 500 nm as an upper

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 35

65

usable limit for nanoagents, as particles larger than this have a very slim chance of staying

66

mobile in a micronetwork system of reservoir rock matrix

67

different characteristics of various nanoparticles that favors the recovery efficiency

68

ability to increase the viscosity of displacing fluids, control of fine migration in reservoirs and a

69

decrease in heavy oil viscosity through the application of nanoparticles were previously noted 36-

70

38.

71

Sweep efficiency of displacing fluid in the formation is another factor important for EOR. The

72

sweep efficiency of the displacing fluid can be increased by increasing its viscosity in the swept

73

zone. High viscosity displacing fluids will lower the water to oil mobility ratio and push the

74

residual oil towards production well 16. Many high molecular weight polymers like xanthan gum

75

39,

76

efficiency with which water can contact and displace reservoir oil. Additionally, many new

77

methods are being developed and continuously evaluated for EOR. Most of which involve

78

combining one or two available EOR methods to share the benefits of both the processes, such as

79

Polymer assisted Microbial EOR 41, Surfactant combined with nanoparticles flooding 42, 43, Foam

80

stabilized by nanoparticles for EOR 9, 10 etc.

81

Currently, polymer flooding is considered as one of the most widely used CEOR processes

82

because of its technical and commercial feasibility

83

received great attention for their potential in recovering crude oil 27. Cheragian and coworkers 44

84

have summarized the reports about the use of available additives to improve the rheological

85

behavior of polymer solution

86

nanoparticles effect on the rheology of polymer solutions used for oil recovery

87

several nano-composites containing nanoparticles have been synthesized using different

polyacrylamide

16,

and copolymers of acrylamide

47,

40

44-46.

30.

Others have investigated the 31-35.

The

etc., have been used to increase the

On the other part, nanotechnology has

and also there is no such report about the investigation of the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

48.

Besides,

Page 5 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

88

polymers and nanoparticles. Possible mechanisms explaining the effects of these polymer

89

nanoparticle interactions on the rheology of the polymer have also been mentioned by many

90

researchers. Maghzi et al. 2013, have shown this combination as an acceptable method for EOR

91

and have reported that nanoparticles can alter the surface wettability 48. Maurya et al. 2017, have

92

reported the presence of silica nanoparticles in the core of polymer structure stabilizes and

93

strengthens the polymer network structure

94

chain at the surface of silica nanoparticles, that improved the surface activity leading to the

95

reduction of IFT at the oil-water interface. Alternatively, polymers in solution also improve

96

limitations of the nanoparticles during flooding through porous matrices. Pooja et al. 2014 also

97

mentioned that two different mechanisms played by natural gums in stabilizing the inorganic

98

nanoparticles

99

nanoparticles creates steric repulsion among the particles, which improves their dispersion in the

100

medium. In another mechanism, polymer molecules increases the viscosity of nanoparticle

101

suspensions resulting in lowering of the aggregation of particles. Therefore, in this study, we

102

investigated a process for increasing the potential of polymer flooding by blending with

103

nanoparticles to improve the performance of the drive fluid for an enhanced recovery. In the

104

present study, we have evaluated the efficiency of nickel nanoparticle, xanthan gum and xanthan

105

gum – nickel nanoparticle mixture for EOR in reservoir simulating sand pack bioreactors.

50.

49.

They have also found the presence of polymer

They reported that the absorption of polymer molecules onto the surface of

106 107

2. Experimental Section

108

2.1. Preparation of crude oil solution for flooding experiments

109

EOR experiments were done with crude oil collected from Ankleshwar oil fields, Gujarat, India.

110

Due to high paraffinic content, the crude oil was mixed with dispersants (i.e., toluene in the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

111

case). The standard solutions of oil were made up with a 2:8 (v:v) mixture of the dispersant to

112

the test oil. The stock of this parent oil was used for performing whole experiments.

113

2.2. Oil standards preparation

114

Standards were prepared by mixing 1 part parent oil (1000 mg) from above to 10 parts

115

dichloromethane, DCM (i.e., 1:10 dilution of the parent oil, v:v). Add a specific volume of

116

parent oil-DCM standard to 30 ml of distilled water in a separatory funnel. Extract the oil-water

117

mixture with 5 ml volumes of DCM after 15 seconds of vigorous shaking followed by a 2-minute

118

stationary period to allow for phase separation after each extraction. Repeat the extraction using

119

a total of three 5 ml portions of DCM. Adjust the final DCM volume for the combined extracts to

120

20 ml with DCM in a 25 ml graduated cylinder 51.

121

A stock solution of parent oil was prepared in a known volume of DCM. Standard dilutions were

122

made from the stock solution (4000 mg of parent oil in 40 ml of DCM). The final concentrations

123

were obtained by diluting the stock solution (100mg/ml) with the fixed volume of DCM (e.g., for

124

80mg/ml solution, 8ml from stock is added to 2 ml DCM) and similarly DCM is added further to

125

obtain standard concentration ranges (100mg-20mg/ml). Oil content in water was determined by

126

adding a known volume of DCM (VDCM), measuring the volume of water (VH2O) and then the

127

volume of oil (Voil) by determining the optical density at 600nm (OD600) of the oil-DCM phase

128

to derive the concentration of oil (Coil) in mg/mL; OD600 was determined using a

129

spectrophotometer. Voil was then calculated as (Voil = Coil × VDCM/ρoil), where ρoil is the density

130

of Ankleshwar oil 52.

131

2.3. Preparation of nanoparticle solution

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

132

Nickel nanoparticles were prepared using 0.19 gms of NiCl2.6H2O in ethylene glycol. The

133

reaction mixture was maintained under constant magnetic stirring in a 100 ml round flask with a

134

certain amount of Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate. In the sequence, the reaction mixture was heated to

135

90ºC for an hour under strong magnetic stirring. A strong dark black coloration was observed

136

immediately after the addition of hydrazine hydrate with an appropriate amount of 1 M NaOH.

137

The system was maintained for about 2 hours at 90 ºC under constant magnetic stirring 53. The

138

resulting black precipitates were centrifuged at 10000 rpm to obtain the pellet and washed with

139

acetone to remove the ethylene glycol.

140

The synthesized nanoparticles were initially characterized by UV-visible spectrophotometer

141

(Evolution 201, Thermo Scientific). This was done by scanning the nanoparticles suspended in

142

aqueous solution from the wavelength range of 200 nm-800 nm by taking water as a blank.

143

Further, XRD (X-ray Diffractometer) was employed to determine the crystallinity of the sample.

144

The sample for analysis was recovered as-synthesized products from the solutions using

145

centrifugation, followed by a few washing steps using water and acetone. The nanoparticles were

146

dried in the desiccator and analyzed in PANalytical- Empyrean with Cu-Kα radiation source in

147

the angle range of 2𝞱= 10ᵒ-100ᵒ. Thereafter, the size and polydispersity of nanoparticles

148

suspended in double distilled water were characterized using Zetasizer (Nano ZSP, Malvern,

149

UK).

150

2.4. Estimation of intrinsic viscosity of polymer solution

151

The viscosity was determined using a dilution capillary viscometer (Cannon-Fenske Routine

152

Viscometer, Size 50, Sigma Aldrich, Germany). This was immersed in a beaker containing

153

distilled water to maintain the temperature at 30◦C ± 0.1◦C. Samples were taken in a conical flask

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 35

154

which was kept inside a beaker containing distilled water and placed over a magnetic stirrer with

155

the hot plate (MHPS5P, LabQuest, Borosil, India) to maintain the desired temperature with

156

constant stirring. The stirrer was maintained at low rpm to minimize disturbances to the solution

157

viscosity. During the measurement, the samples were withdrawn from the flask and passed

158

through the viscometer using a micro-funnel and the time of flow of solvent-polymer system was

159

noted. All measurements were carried out at a concentration range of 0.005-0.02% w/v of the

160

polymer solution. The densities of the polymer solutions were determined using a standardized

161

25-mL pycnometer (Borosil, India), for calculating the kinematic viscosity

162

solution was determined from the difference in weight of the empty pycnometer and filled

163

vessel. Glycerol and sucrose standard solutions were prepared and used as a reference standard

164

for recalibration of the capillary viscometer 55.

165

Rheological behavior of polymeric solutions plays an important role in the success of oil

166

recovery. In this study, the rheological behavior of polymer solutions in distilled water, Colville

167

synthetic brine (CSBK) medium56 and in CSBK containing nanoparticles medium was evaluated.

168

At first, the intrinsic viscosity of xanthan gum dispersed in distilled water was evaluated for

169

different concentrations. To investigate the effect of nanoparticles on the rheological behavior of

170

xanthan solution, the change in intrinsic viscosity was compared to different conditions (using

171

CSBK and CSBK containing nanoparticles as dispersion medium).

172

The hydrodynamic volume occupied by a macromolecule gives a measure of the intrinsic

173

viscosity which relates to the size and conformation of a polysaccharide (xanthan gum)

174

macromolecular chain in a particular solvent

175

parameter for studying polymer solutions as this provides deep insights into the molecular

176

characteristics of the biopolymer

59.

57, 58.

54.

The mass of the

Intrinsic viscosity is hence an important

Our experimental procedure generally followed the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

177

specifications and directions for use recommended by American Society for Testing Materials

178

(ASTM)

179

which specific viscosity (ƞsp) was calculated. The intrinsic viscosity (ƞ) was later derived from

180

reduced viscosity (ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑑 = ƞ𝑠𝑝 𝐶) and inherent viscosity (ƞ𝑖𝑛ℎ = ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 𝐶), where ƞred and ƞ𝑖𝑛ℎ could

181

be calculated at various dilutions and at the same shear rate, and extrapolating the course of

182

specific viscosity/relative viscosity to infinite dilution

183

dependence (ƞsp/C) is often expressed in terms of the following relationship;

184

ƞsp / C =

185

Where, kH’ is known as Huggins constant 63. For flexible polymer molecules in good solvents, K

186

is often near to 0.35, although somewhat higher values occur in poor solvents. Also, Kraemer in

187

1938 devised an equation to obtain intrinsic viscosity by extrapolation to zero concentration (C)

188

64- 66.

189

ln ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 𝐶

60.

Initially, the relative viscosity (ƞrel) is measured from capillary viscometer from

61, 62.

Alternatively, the concentration

[ƞ] + kH’ [ƞ]2 C

(1)

= [ƞ] + 𝑘𝐻" [ƞ]2𝐶

(2)

190

Where kH” is the Kraemer constant. Tanglertpaibul and Rao (1987), found methods for

191

determination of intrinsic viscosity based on slopes of plots had higher correlation coefficients

192

and lower standard errors, compared with those based on the intercept of plots 67. They used the

193

following equations to obtain the intrinsic viscosity:

194

ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 = 1 + [ƞ]𝐶

195

The intrinsic viscosity [ƞ] is the slope obtained by plotting ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 vs. C

196

ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 = 𝑒[ƞ]𝐶

197

The intrinsic viscosity [ƞ] is the slope obtained by plotting ln ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 vs. C

(3)

(4)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

Page 10 of 35

(5)

198

ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 = 1 ―

199

The intrinsic viscosity is the slope obtained by plotting 1-1/ƞ𝑟𝑒𝑙 vs. C.

200

Particularly in this study, the intrinsic viscosity of very low concentration polymer solutions was

201

estimated on the basis of Eqn. (1), (3), (4) and (5), and this four methods were compared

202

statistically for a better fit.

203

2.5. Polymer solution prepared for flooding experiments

204

All experiments were carried out using commercial Xanthan gum (Hi-Media products). Xanthan

205

gum powder was weighed in different concentration ranges (0.01%-0.04%) and dissolved in

206

CSBK medium 56. The pH of the medium was maintained at 7.2 to 7.4. The polymer was added

207

slowly to different solvent systems (CSBK and CSBK containing nanoparticles medium) with

208

constant stirring over a magnetic stirrer and incubated at room temperature for 24 hours to allow

209

hydration of polymers.

210

2.6. Sand pack up flow bioreactors

211

Syringes of 60 ml without piston was packed with glass wool (~1.5 cm height) and then with

212

polymeric mesh to enhance its ability to hold the sand filled in the syringe. As the sand (Sigma-

213

Aldrich, 50-70 mesh) was loaded, the syringe was continuously tapped for uniform tight packing.

214

Once the sand had been filled, another layer of glass wool was placed above similarly as

215

mentioned earlier to prevent the sand to flow out of the syringe. The syringe was then closed

216

using a perforated rubber stopper fitted with a plastic connector in the center, through which the

217

liquid can flow inside the syringe. After the column had been assembled the dry weight of the

218

column was measured. Later, the column was flooded with distilled water and its wet weight was

219

measured again to calculate the pore volume and porosity (Table S1). A three-way valve was

[ƞ]𝐶

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

220

later fixed on both inlet and outlet points of the syringe bioreactors for injecting and drawing

221

samples during experimentation. Zip ties were then wrapped around the rubber stoppers to

222

ensure a tight seal with no leakage and sipping of fluids from the syringe bioreactors. The three-

223

way valves were connected through the silicon tubing (4.0 (O.D) * 1.0 (W.T) * 2.0 (I.D) in mm)

224

at inlet and outlet points were connected to tygon tubings (4.0 (O.D) * 1.0 (W.T)* 2.0 (I.D) in

225

mm). The influent tubing was connected to the pump tubing placed in the head of a 4 - channel

226

peristaltic pump (Miclins, India) through plastic syringe connectors. CSBK medium was pumped

227

from sealed glass bottles with an N2-CO2 headspace. The bottle had been sealed with a

228

perforated rubber cork through which anaerobic gas filled in a gas balloon refilled the headspace

229

through a plastic syringe filter (0.2 µm) connected to the rubber cork. The effluent was led into

230

serum bottles (120 ml). Four syringe bioreactors were constructed and subsequently, their pore

231

volume (PV) was measured. Subsequently, 4 pore volumes of brine were passed through the

232

bioreactors to ensure its 100% saturation with brine.

233

The syringe bioreactors were then flooded with 1 PV of parent oil replacing approximately 0.93

234

PV - 0.95 PV of CSBK medium with oil. Initial oil saturation was found by measuring the

235

volume of brine displaced by oil saturation, also called original oil in place (OOIP) and found to

236

be ~26 ml. Oil was then produced by pumping of anoxic CSBK at a rate of 1 PV/day. The oil

237

content of the produced oil-water mixture was analyzed daily until no oil was further produced

238

from the bioreactors (Stage 1, typically 2 weeks). Oil content was determined by extracting the

239

oil from the produced oil-water mixture using a known volume of DCM as explained earlier.

240

In Stage 2, four different injection strategies were followed. Bioreactor A, was injected with 2PV

241

of xanthan dispersed in CSBK medium, Bioreactor B was injected with 2PV of nickel

242

nanoparticles dispersed in CSBK medium, Bioreactor C was injected with a mixture of xanthan

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

243

and nickel nanoparticles (2PV). Bioreactor D was injected only with CSBK and acted as the

244

control. A concentration of 3g/L for Nickel nanoparticles, 1g/L for xanthan gum and 1.5g/L and

245

0.5 g/L (half of the concentration used individually) of both in the mixture respectively were

246

used for flooding of sand pack syringe bioreactors.

247

Effluent from these bioreactors was collected during different injection strategies and in 48 hours

248

incubation just after injection. Following incubation, up-flow injection of CSBK medium was

249

resumed in all the bioreactors at 1 PV/day in stage 3. The additional oil recovered was now

250

measured spectrophotometrically at 600 nm.

251

3. Experimental results and discussion

252

3.1. Nickel nanoparticles characterization

253

In the current study, the nickel nanoparticles were synthesized corresponding to 200 nm size,

254

characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS) plot, since smaller sized particles (