An Effective Design of Electrically Conducting Thin-Film Composite

Subscriber access provided by EPFL | Scientific Information and Libraries

Article

An Effective Design of Electrically Conducting Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Membranes for Bio and Organic Fouling Control in Forward Osmosis (FO) Qing Liu, Guanglei Qiu, Zhengzhong Zhou, Jingguo Li, Gary Lee Amy, Jianping Xie, and Jim Yang Lee Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03402 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Sep 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 9, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

1

An Effective Design of Electrically Conducting Thin-Film Composite

2

(TFC) Membranes for Bio and Organic Fouling Control in Forward

3

Osmosis (FO)

4

Qing Liu a, Guanglei Qiu a, Zhengzhong Zhou a, Jingguo Li a, Gary Lee Amy a, b, Jianping Xie a*, Jim

5

Yang Lee a*

6

a

7

Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260.

8

b

Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent

College of Engineering and Science, Clemson University, Clemson SC 29634 USA

9 10

*

Corresponding author:

11

E-mail: [email protected] & [email protected].

12

Phone: (65) 65162899

13

Fax: (65) 6779193

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 2 of 35

14

ABSTRACT: The organic foulants and bacteria in secondary wastewater treatment can seriously

15

impair the membrane performance in a water treatment plant. The embedded electrode approach using

16

an externally applied potential to repel organic foulants and inhibit bacterial adhesion can effectively

17

reduce the frequency of membrane replacement. Electrode embedment in membranes is often carried

18

out by dispensing a conductor (e.g. carbon nanotubes, or CNTs) in the membrane substrate, which gives

19

rise to two problems: the leaching-out of the conductor and a percolation-limited membrane

20

conductivity that results in an added energy cost. This study presents a facile method for the embedment

21

of a continuous electrode in thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. Specifically,

22

a conducting porous carbon paper is used as the understructure for the formation of a membrane

23

substrate by the classical phase inversion process. The carbon paper and the membrane substrate

24

polymer form an interpenetrating structure with good stability and low electrical resistance (only about

25

1Ω/ ). The membrane-electrode assembly was deployed as the cathode of an electrochemical cell, and

26

showed good resistance to organic and microbial fouling with the imposition of a 2.0V DC voltage. The

27

carbon paper-based FO TFC membranes also possess good mechanical stability for practical use.

28


Page 3 of 35


29

INTRODUCTION

30

Forward osmosis (FO) used in conjunction with other membrane processes can significantly

31

increase the overall energy efficiency in membrane water desalination and wastewater reuse1-5.

32

In the FO process, water is drawn from the feed solution (low osmotic pressure) to the draw

33

solution (high osmotic pressure) by the osmotic pressure gradient across a semipermeable

34

membrane. Due to the asymmetry in the FO membrane structure, there are two operating modes

35

in a FO process: the AL-FS mode (where the active layer is facing the feed solution) or the AL-

36

DS mode (where the active layer is facing the draw solution). Generally, water flux is higher in

37

the AL-DS mode due to a smaller internal concentration polarization6-14. The AL-DS mode can

38

also be used for osmotic pressure generation (the pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process). The

39

AL-DS mode however has a higher fouling tendency since the foulants in the feed solution can

40

easily enter the porous membrane substrate.

41

Biopolymers, proteins, and microbes are the predominant foulants in the FO treatment of

42

secondary wastewater15. The organic compounds can adsorb on the membrane exterior surface

43

and on the porous membrane interior to form a gel layer, which not only plugs the pores to lead

44

to a water flux reduction, but also causes bacterial growth16.

45

polymeric substances (EPS) during the bacterial growth could culminate in biofilm formation.

46

The biofilm under the protection of EPS is stubbornly resistant to physical and chemical

47

cleaning17, 20-23. It is still a challenge to design FO membranes which are resistant to both organic

48

and bacterial fouling.

49

The enhancement of membrane hydrophilicity is commonly used to improve the membrane

50

fouling resistance. It is reported that antifouling properties are derived from the strong hydration

The release of extracellular



Page 4 of 35

51

layer on a hydrophilic surface, which inhibits the adsorption of foulants23-26. Since the majority

52

of organic foulants are negatively charged27, the other commonly used method is to impart

53

negative charge to the membrane surface to electrostatically repel the adhesion of negatively

54

charged organic foulants and bacteria28. The fabrication of hydrophilic or negatively charged

55

membranes is often complex and has so far been targeted mostly at organic foulants29-34.

56

Biofouling resistance, on the other hand, is often addressed by adding antimicrobial

57

nanomaterials to a membrane formulation35-37. The stability and durability of the modified

58

membranes is often an issue due to the leachability of the biocides, which becomes a source of

59

secondary contamination.

60

An alternative method to alter and introduce charges to a membrane surface is the application of

61

an external potential, which has shown good antifouling properties38, 39. The membrane needs to

62

be modified with a conductor to allow the application of an electric potential for microbial

63

control but without the loss of the desired membrane properties40-50. Among the different

64

additives that have been used to produce composite conducting membranes, the highly

65

conducting CNTs are the most common. In the study by Vecitis et al., a PTFE filter coated with

66

CNTs was used as the anode. The application of a 3 V DC voltage was found to be effective for

67

annihilating bacteria and viruses43. Direct anodic oxidation and indirect oxidation of bacteria by

68

the aqueous oxidants formed in anodic oxidation were proposed as the bacteria inactivation

69

mechanisms. Lannoy et al. reported a thin film composite (TFC) membrane with cross-linked

70

CNTs in the polyamide (PA) selective layer. Improved biofouling resistance was shown with the

71

application of 1.5V AC49. The authors theorized that an alternating potential causes instabilities

72

in the local pH and the electrical double layer, thus creating a non-ideal environment for bacterial

73

growth. In addition, bacteria are repelled by an applied negative potential and oxidized by a 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 35


74

positive applied potential. This bacterial inhibition mechanism was also mentioned in the study

75

of Ronen et al. 41 where the bacterial growth on CNTs-PVA composite membranes was reduced

76

by a -1.5V applied potential. The authors suggested that bacterial inhibition was due to the H2O2

77

formed in the cathodic reaction of oxygen reduction.

78

The anti-organic fouling properties of CNT-incorporated composite conducting membranes have

79

also been examined with the application of a DC voltage. In the work of Zhang et al on CNT-

80

containing ultrafiltration (UF) membranes45, the authors attributed the fouling reduction with the

81

application of a negative potential to the increased energy barrier and the decreased collision

82

efficiency of negatively charged organic matters with the membrane surface. The composite

83

CNT-UF membranes were also used in the Dudchenko study40. These conducting membranes

84

when used as the cathode were able to reduce fouling by polyacrylic acid (PAA) at a moderate

85

applied potential (3-5V). However, different from bacterial inactivation, a positive applied

86

potential aggravated the organic fouling. These observations corroborated the electrostatic

87

repulsion mechanism proposed by Zhang et al. in their study45.

88

The above studies showed that membranes which are rendered conducting by CNTs can reduce

89

organic fouling by applying a small negative potential, while bacterial attachment can be

90

inhibited by applying a small positive or negative potential. These conducting membranes are

91

often produced by the “blending” or “coating” methods. The conducting additives often present

92

themselves as a dispersed phase, which gives rise to two potential issues: the possibility of CNT

93

leaching (unless covalently bonded); and a percolation-limited conductivity improvement. Thus

94

it is hypothesized that a contiguous phase of conducting materials should provide a better long-

95

term stability and greater conductivity enhancements. In addition, since organic fouling and 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 6 of 35

96

microbial fouling are performance limiting factors in the water treatment process, this study not

97

only investigated the membrane resistance to microbial deposition and growth, but also the

98

membrane resistance to organic foulants; in the presence of a low and negative applied potential.

99

Carbon paper with a porous architecture and good conductivity is often used as the diffusion

100

layer in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. It has also been used as the electrode for

101

electrochemical disinfection51. Herein, we have designed polyethersulfone (PES) FO TFC

102

membranes with carbon paper as the continuous conducting phase. Specifically, a conducting

103

porous carbon paper is used as the understructure for the formation of the membrane substrate by

104

the classical phase inversion process. The carbon paper and the substrate polymer form an

105

interpenetrating structure with good stability and low electrical resistance (at only 1Ω/ ). The

106

conductivity of the composite membrane can be as high as 5500S/m. This membrane-electrode

107

assembly was deployed as the cathode of an electrochemical cell, and good organic and

108

microbial fouling resistance was shown with the imposition of a 2.0V DC voltage. Furthermore,

109

these carbon paper-based polymer membranes also have significantly improved mechanical

110

properties, which are important for their practical use.

111

EXPERIMENTAL

112

Materials

113

Radel

114

polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG, Mn=400g/mol) from Merck; m-phenylenediamine (MPD, ＞

115

99%), 1,3,5-benzenetricarbonyl trichloride (TMC, 98%), n-hexanes (＞99.9%), sodium alginate,

116

sodium chloride and fluorescein isothiocynateconjugated bovine serum albumin (BSA-FITC)

®

A PES from Solvay Advanced Polymers; N-methyl-2-pyrrolodinone (NMP, ＞99.5%),


Page 7 of 35


117

from Sigma-Aldrich, Carbon paper (NOS1005) from CeTech, were used as received. De-ionized

118

(DI) water was produced by a Milli-Q ultrapure water system (Millipore, USA).

119

Membrane preparation

120

The pristine PES membrane substrate was formed by the Loeb-Sourirajan phase inversion

121

method. In brief, the PES polymer after drying in vacuum overnight (for moisture removal) was

122

mixed with PEG-400, NMP and water in the ratio of PES: PEG: NMP: water = 20:37.9:37.9:4.2

123

(wt.%) to form a casting dope. The dope after overnight degassing was cast onto a glass plate

124

with a casting knife. The as-cast membrane was quickly immersed in a room temperature water

125

coagulation bath and kept in DI water for 24 h to ensure complete precipitation.

126

For the preparation of carbon paper-containing PES membranes, a carbon paper was placed on

127

the glass plate and the dope was cast onto the carbon paper instead (Figure S1). All other steps

128

were the same as in the preparation of pristine PES membranes. The carbon paper-containing

129

PES membrane was designated as Car-PES.

130

A PA selective layer was formed on the membrane top face by the following procedure: a

131

membrane substrate was immersed in a 2wt% MPD aqueous solution for 1min. The excess MPD

132

solution was carefully removed from the membrane surface with a filter paper. This was

133

followed by contacting the same membrane surface with a 0.1wt% TMC solution in n-hexane for

134

30s. The TFC membrane fabricated as such was air-dried for 5min and then stored in DI water.

135

Membrane characterization



Page 8 of 35

136

Membrane morphology was examined by field-emission scanning electron microscopy

137

(FESEM). The membrane sample for microscopy examination was freeze-dried, cryo-fractured

138

in liquid nitrogen, and then surface coated with Pt. A JSM 6700F (JEOL, Japan) microscope

139

operating at 5kV accelerating voltage was used for the FESEM. Water contact angle

140

measurements were carried at room temperature, using a Contact Angle Goniometer (Rame

141

Hart) and Milli-Q deionized probe liquid to evaluate the hydrophilicity of the membrane

142

substrate. The mechanical properties of the membrane substrate were measured by an Instron

143

5542 tensile test equipment. A flat sheet membrane was cut into 5 mm wide stripes and clamped

144

at the both ends. The initial gauge length of 30 mm was stretched at the rate of 10 mm/min. At

145

least five stripes were tested for each casting condition to obtain the mean values of membrane

146

tensile stress, Young’s modulus and elongation at break. A four-point conductivity probe

147

(Signatone S-302-4) was used for the measurements of electrical sheet resistance.

148

A dead end stainless steel RO filtration cell was used to measure the substrate water permeability

149

(A). The effective membrane area in the cell was 9.62 cm2. Water permeability A was calculated

150

from the pure water permeation flux under a transmembrane pressure of 3 bar by equation 1

151

where Jv is the volumetric water flux and ∆P is the applied hydraulic pressure.

A=

Jv ∆P

(1)

152

Membrane substrate porosity ε, defined as the total pore volume divided by the membrane

153

volume, was determined by a gravimetric method and calculated as follows: (w2-w1) ρ1 ε=

(2) 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 35


154

where w1 is the dry weight of PES substrate membrane, w2 is total weight of substrate saturated

155

with water. Vm is the total volume of the membrane.

156

The mean (µp) and the standard deviation (σp) of the effective pore size of each membrane

157

substrate were measured by the solute rejection method with a dead-end stainless steel RO

158

filtration set-up. 1 bar of pressure was applied to a 200 ppm solution of a neutral solute (PEG or

159

polyethyleneoxide (PEO)) to permeate the solute through the membrane. The solute

160

concentrations in the feed and in the permeate were measured by a total organic carbon analyzer

161

(TOCASI-5000A, Shimadzu, Japan). A more detailed description of the measurement

162

procedures can be found in the open literature 52.

163

The FO performance of membrane was measured by the water flux (Jv in L/m2h, or LMH) and

164

reverse salt flux (Js in g/m2h, or gMH) calculated from the following equations. Jv=

∆V 1 (5) ∆t Am

Js=

(CtVt)-(C0V0) 1 ∆t Am

(6)

165

where ∆V(L) is the volume of water permeated through the membrane in a given period of time

166

∆t (h), Am is the effective membrane surface area (m2). Ct and Vt are the salt concentration (g/L)

167

and the volume of the feed solution (L) at the end of the FO test respectively. Their

168

corresponding values at the start of the experiment are C0 and V0. Salt concentrations were again

169

measured conductometrically. The dilution of the draw solution in the experiments was



Page 10 of 35

170

negligible since the amount of water permeated to the draw solution was less than 1% of the

171

latter.

172

Microbial fouling on the FO TFC membranes

173

Gram-negative E-coli and Gram-positive S. aureus strain were used to evaluate the membrane

174

bacterial resistance. E-coli and S.aureus were cultured in a Lysogeny broth (LB) and incubated

175

in an Isotemp incubator (Fisher Scientific, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) overnight at 37℃ (shaking

176

speed: 150rpm). The culture was centrifuged at 3000rpm for 10min, and the precipitated pellet

177

was re-suspended in a LB solution. The cell suspension prepared as such was used as the

178

bacterial stock solution, and was diluted to 107colony-forming units (CFU)/ml before use. Each

179

PES and Car-PES membrane was immersed in the bacterial suspension for 4 hours. Meanwhile,

180

a negative potential (-2V) was also applied to a Car-PES membrane in the bacterial suspension

181

under the same condition. The value of -2V was determined after a limited scoping experiment

182

and provided the “best” membrane performance without any gas liberation. The bacteria adhered

183

to the membrane back surface was examined by SEM. This involved fixing the bacteria in the

184

membrane with a 3vol.% glutaraldehyde phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution at 4°C,

185

followed by rinsing with PBS solution several times to remove the excess glutaraldehyde. The

186

“fixed” samples were dehydrated with ethanol solutions (25, 50, 75 and 100v/v), air-dried, and

187

coated with platinum (20mA, 30s) for SEM examination. The quantifications of bacterial

188

adhesion and viability on the membrane substrate were carried out by the spread plate method. A

189

membrane sample was put in 5ml of PBS, followed by ultrasonication for 7min to remove the

190

loose bacterial deposit on the sample surface. The bacterial solution was sequentially diluted, and

191

spread on the agar plate. The colonies were counted after 24h of growth. The inactivation rates 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 35


192

were calculated by comparing the cell density of the Car-PES membranes with that of the PES

193

membrane.

194

Two additional tests were also used to evaluate the effect of microbial fouling on membrane

195

performance under simulated operating conditions. In the stationary test, a membrane sample

196

after the FO test was immersed in the E-coli and S.aureus suspension for 3 days. The bacterial

197

suspension was refreshed every 24 h in order to maintain a constant desired bacterial

198

concentration. The membrane FO performance was measured again after a 3-day period and

199

washing with PBS. In the continuous microbial fouling test, the AL-DS orientation was chosen

200

because of its high water flux and a greater fouling propensity. The set-up shown in Figure S2

201

was used to apply the potential to the Car-PES membrane. The same set-up without the applied

202

potential was used for the control PES and Car-PES membranes. Prior to fouling the water flux

203

through the membrane was measured with a DI water feed and a 2 M NaCl draw solution for 1h.

204

The DI water was then replaced with a LB solution containing 107 CFU/ml of E-coli. After the

205

fouling test, the membrane was cleaned by flowing DI water at 0.1 L/min on both sides of the

206

membrane. The water flux through the membrane was then re-measured with DI water (feed

207

solution) and 2 M NaCl solution (draw solution). Baseline experiments were conducted under the

208

same conditions using a LB solution without the bacteria. All processes were operated at room

209

temperature (20 ± 1) °C.

210

Protein adsorption on membranes

211

BSA-FITC solution was used to measure the protein adsorption behavior of FO TFC membranes.

212

A membrane was rinsed initially with a PBS solution and then soaked in the BSA-FITC solution

213

(0.5 mg/mL PBS solution) at room temperature for 1 h. The adsorption was imaged by a Leica 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 12 of 35

214

DMLM fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with an

215

excitation filter of 495 nm and an emission filter of 525 nm.

216

Organic fouling of FO TFC membranes

217

The organic fouling of the membranes was evaluated on the same laboratory-scale FO setup at

218

the AL-DS orientation. Since natural surface water contains not only organic foulants but also

219

dissolved salts, the alginate solutions were also prepared to contain 4 mM NaCl. The NaCl

220

concentration was chosen to emulate the conductivity of typical natural surface water (150-500

221

µs cm-1, corresponding to 1-4mM NaCl). In this continuous fouling test, the feed was DI water or

222

the foulant solution (400ppm alginate + 4mM NaCl) and the draw solution was 2M NaCl

223

solution. The feed and the draw solution flew counter-currently to each other at room

224

temperature (20 ± 1) °C at a flow rate of 0.1 L/min. Prior to the test, the FO membrane was

225

stabilized and tested with DI water for 1h. To initiate the fouling test, the DI water feed was

226

replaced with the foulant solution. Control experiments were carried out under the same

227

conditions in the absence of foulants. 12 hours later, the membrane was cleaned for 1h by

228

running a FO process using DI water as the feed and the draw solution at 0.1L/min. The FO

229

performance of the cleaned membrane was retested again with a DI water feed and a 2M NaCl

230

draw solution.

231

RESULT & DISCUSSION

232

Substrate characterizations

233

The preparation of a FO-TFC membrane on carbon paper was a facile process, similar to the

234

preparation of a TFC membrane. In this design the carbon paper provided the continuum for 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 35


235

electron conduction. This can be seen from the SEM image of a typical carbon paper in Figure

236

S3 where the carbon fibers interwove into a connected network. The pore size of the carbon

237

paper was hundreds of µm large, and hence it is reasonable to expect the PES polymer could

238

easily infiltrate the pores of the carbon paper during casting. Figure 1 shows the morphologies of

239

a pristine PES membrane versus a Car-PES membrane as examined by FESEM. The pristine

240

PES membrane was cast to almost the same thickness as the carbon paper (~ 200 µm). The PES

241

membrane showed the characteristic finger-like cavities with a denser top layer. The Car-PES

242

membrane was morphologically different showing a distinct two layer structure: a thin (~10 µm)

243

dense PES layer in the membrane top surface; and PES-infused carbon fibers in the membrane

244

bottom layer (~ 190 µm). The morphology and the cross-section of the top layer were the same

245

in both membranes, which is to be expected since there were no carbon fibers in this layer. The

246

dense top layer structure was formed by the rapid solvent outflow to the surrounding water when

247

a nascent membrane was immersed in the coagulation bath. Consequently the PA layers formed

248

by IP on the membrane top surface were also similar (Figure S4), suggesting that the presence of

249

a carbon paper in the composite membrane would not affect the membrane selectivity. The

250

presence of the carbon paper, however, created a very different bottom layer. The large pores in

251

the PES back surface ~100 µm in size were caused by the incoming water flux being faster than

252

the outgoing solvent (NMP) flux in phase inversion. For the Car-PES membrane, the PES

253

polymer and the carbon fibers formed an interlocked structure. However, the presence of the

254

carbon paper inhibited the water influx in phase inversion and disrupted the formation of the

255

finger-like porous structure. On the other hand, the pores in the carbon paper were not

256

completely occupied by PES due to filling from the top. Thus some pores in the Car-PES

257

membrane back surface were larger than those in the PES membrane. The interlocking carbon13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 14 of 35

258

PES structure is expected to improve the membrane stability in water treatment since the

259

mechanically more robust carbon paper could adhere strongly to the membrane.

260 261

Figure 1: Morphologies of the cross-section, top and bottom surfaces of PES (a, c, e) and Car-

262

PES membrane substrate (b, d, f)

263

Membrane durability is determined by its mechanical strength, which can be undermined by the

264

defects formed in a membrane fabrication process. The measurements of the mechanical

265

strengths of the PES and Car-PES membranes (Table 1); however, allayed such a concern.

266

Instead the Car-PES substrate was mechanically strong; showing significantly enhanced

267

mechanical properties to surpass the PES membrane, the carbon paper, and all of the previously

268

reported polymer membranes. The interlocking structure is the most likely reason for the synergy

269

in integrating PES with carbon paper.

270

271 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 35


272

Material

Young’s modulus/MPa

Tensile strength/ MPa

Elongation at break /%

PES

152.0±22.4

4.2±0.6

17.1±4.3

Car-PES

5520.0±420.5

23.6±1.3

0.5±0.2

Carbon paper

2610.2±205.6

8.3±0.7

0.6±0.3

273

Table 1: Mechanical properties of PES and Car-PES membranes and carbon paper

274

The water permeability (A) of PES and Car-PES membranes was evaluated in a RO filtration

275

set-up. It can be seen that water permeability was slightly higher for the Car-PES membrane. It is

276

well known that in a pressure driven process like RO, water permeability is mainly determined

277

by the membrane porosity and pore size4. While Table S1 shows comparable porosities for the

278

two membranes; the average effective pore size was slightly larger for the Car-PES membrane.

279

Its larger standard deviation also suggests a broader pore size distribution. This is consistent with

280

the SEM images in Figure 1 where some large pores can be easily found on the Car-PES

281

substrate back surface.

282

The inclusion of a carbon paper in the membrane might bring about two structural effects that

283

could impact the membrane water flux. One was the suppression of the membrane finger-like

284

structure leading to lower porosity and reduced water flux, while the other was the creation of

285

enlarged pores which increased porosity, reduced tortuosity and increased water flux. The two

286

effects were mutually compensating to result in an incidental increase in the water flux.

287

Contact angle measurements were carried out next to evaluate the membrane hydrophilicity.

288

Table S1 shows that the contact angles on the membrane top surface were quite close; which is 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 16 of 35

289

to be expected due to the likeness of the PES and Car-PES and PES membrane top layers. More

290

interestingly, despite the hydrophobic nature of the carbon fibers, the contact angle on the back

291

surface of Car-PES was only slightly higher than that of PES. This is indication of the

292

encapsulation of the carbon fibers by the infiltrated PES polymer. Previous research has shown

293

that the water flux in FO water is constrained by internal concentration polarization (ICP), which

294

depends on the water permeability and substrate hydrophilicity52-55. A more hydrophilic substrate

295

not only facilitates water and salt transport but also suppresses air bubble formation in the

296

substrate to increase the effective porosity and reduce the ICP. The comparable porosity and

297

contact angle of PES and Car-PES is a good sign since it implies that the inclusion of the

298

conducting carbon paper would not bring about an adverse effect to the FO water flux.

299

The electrical properties of the composite conducting membrane are important to the use of

300

external potential for fouling control. The sheet resistance of the Car-PES membrane as

301

measured by the four point probe method was a low 1.0 Ω/ . This compares very favorably to

302

previous work using CNTs where the sheet resistance was a high 6000 Ω/

303

connectivity of dispersed CNTs in an insulating polymer matrix. The conductivity of the Car-

304

PES membrane calculated from the measured sheet resistance and a membrane thickness of 180

305

µm was 5500S/m.

306

The FO performance of PES and Car-PES TFC membranes

307

The water flux and the reverse salt flux of the PES and Car-PES TFC membranes in FO were

308

measured in a conventional FO set-up using a DI water feed solution and a 2M NaCl draw

309

solution. The membrane performance was evaluated in two typical membrane orientations (AL-

310

FS and AL-DS) and the results are summarized in Figure 2. In comparison with the PES

48

due to the poor


Page 17 of 35


311

membrane, the FO water flux and the reverse salt flux of the Car-PES membrane showed a slight

312

decrease. As mentioned earlier, the carbon paper inclusion could bring about two effects: an

313

increase in water permeability (A) in RO and a decrease in hydrophilicity (stronger ICP effect).

314

The measured FO data were the result of a balance of these two competing factors.

315 316

Figure 2: FO performance of PES and Car-PES TFC membranes: (a) water flux; (b) reverse salt

317

flux

318

Microbial resistance of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes

319

The pristine PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes were fouled with

320

two model bacteria: S.aureus which is gram-positive and E-coli which is gram-negative. The

321

SEM images in Figure 3 were taken after the membranes were exposed to the bacterial

322

suspensions for 4h. The deposition and growth of the E-coli and S.aureus bacteria was extensive

323

on the PES and Car-PES membranes. These bacteria also tended to form colonies on the

324

membrane surface resulting in pore plugging. By comparison, when a -2V DC voltage was

325

applied to the Car-PES membrane, a very clean membrane surface was obtained. Only a few

326

bacteria were found on the surface without colony formation or pore plugging. Hence an 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 18 of 35

327

electrically negatively charged membrane could effectively repel bacteria to inhibit their

328

deposition and growth.

329 330

Figure 3: SEM images of bacterial deposition and growth on the PES, Car-PES and electrically

331

charged Car-PES TFC membranes.

332

The antimicrobial properties of the membranes were evaluated by a quantitative antifouling

333

assay using the spread plate method. Figure 4 shows that the amount of viable bacteria was

334

somewhat higher on the Car-PES membrane. This could be due to the slightly more hydrophobic

335

surface of the Car-PES membrane found earlier in the contact angle measurements. A

336

hydrophobic surface is known to promote the interaction between the bacteria and the membrane

337

surface. The electrically charged Car-PES membrane, on the other hand, showed a substantial

338

decrease of bacterial adhesion, reducing the adherent fraction to only about 10%. The

339

mechanism of bacterial inhibition in a low potential is still not well understood, and different

340

theories about the application of positive or negative surface charge have been proposed. In this

341

study where the applied potential was negative, the major mechanism of bacterial inhibition 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 35


342

should be the like-charge electrostatic repulsion between bacteria and a negatively charged

343

membrane surface, which has been proven to effectively repel bacterial approach and prevent

344

biofilm formation

345

of H2O2 by the electrochemical reduction of oxygen. Ronen et al. have shown that the

346

electrochemically produced H2O2 could decrease microbial cell viability and increase cell

347

membrane permeability. A microscopic amount of H2O2 near the membrane surface could be

348

sufficiently lethal to the bacteria to inhibit biofilm formation in a membrane filtration

349

operation41.

49, 56

. However we could not rule out the formation of a microscopic amount

350 351

Figure 4: The static bacteria adhesion behavior of S.aureus and E.coli on PES, Car-PES and

352

electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes

353

In order to examine the effects of bacterial attachment on the performance of these FO

354

membranes in water treatment, a comparison of the water flux (Figure 5) and the reverse salt flux

355

(Figure S5) before and after bacterial attachment was carried out after a brief physical wash. For

356

the PES and Car-PES membranes, the water flux decrease of over 50% was caused by serious 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 20 of 35

357

fouling by bacterial colonies and biofilm formation. On the contrary, water flux recovery was

358

almost 100% for the negatively charged Car-PES membrane, consistent with the SEM

359

observation of very limited bacterial deposition and growth. While no current flow and no gas

360

liberation were detected, we still could not rule out the possible formation of a microscopic

361

amount of H2O2.

362 363

Figure 5: Effects of microbial fouling on the water flux of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged

364

Car-PES TFC membranes

365

Prior to the continuous microbial fouling test, baseline measurements were carried out to

366

quantify the water flux reduction due to the adsorption of compounds from the LB solution

367

and the decrease in osmotic pressure gradient caused by draw solution dilution and feed

368

solution concentration. The baseline curves for the PES and Car-PES membranes trended

369

similarly, showing about 10% water flux reduction over 24h of operation (Figure S6). The

370

biofouling resistance of these membranes was measured in continuous FO tests using a LB

371

suspension of E-coli as the feed to simulate biological wastewater, and compared with the 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 35


372

membrane performance in DI water. The results showed ~80% of water flux decrease for both

373

PES and Car-PES membranes in 24h (Figure 6). This substantial reduction should again be

374

attributed to bacterial growth and biofilm formation. In the AL-DS orientation, bacterial

375

deposition occurred in the membrane substrate, and was difficult to remove by physical

376

washing due to the lack of shear forces in the membrane structure. Consequently, the

377

water flux of these two membranes could only restore to ~30% of its initial value after

378

cleaning (Figure S7). The electrically charged Car-PES membrane fared much better by

379

comparison, showing about 30% of water flux decrease in 24h (Figure 6); and 84%

380

recovery of the initial water flux after cleaning (Figure S7). These measurements are

381

consistent with the result from SEM observations, verifying that bacteria could barely

382

deposit and grow on the electrically charged membrane.

383 384

Figure 6: Comparison of membrane resistance to microbial fouling with bacteria LB suspension

385

as feed solution. The draw solution was 2M NaCl. The flow rates on both sides of the membrane

386

were 0.1L/min. 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 22 of 35

387

Adsorption of organic foulants on PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC

388

membranes

389

Protein adsorption resistance is a common test for evaluating the anti-organic fouling

390

performance of water treatment membranes. Hence the PES, Car-PES and electrically charged

391

Car-PES TFC membranes after exposure to a fluorescent BSA-FITC protein solution (0.5

392

mg/ml) for 1 hour were examined with a fluorescence microscope. Figure 7 showed that such

393

treatment conditions caused the complete coverage of the pristine PES membrane with BSA

394

molecules, which gave rise to a strong fluorescence. This is consistent with previous studies that

395

the hydrophobic-hydrophobic interactions between the benzene rings of PES and protein

396

molecules would promote BSA adsorption34. Since carbon paper did not show any affinity for

397

BSA adsorption, the strong fluorescence of the Car-PES membrane is another indication of the

398

encapsulation of the carbon fibers by the PES polymer; and the permeation of the BSA

399

molecules through the pore system of the carbon paper. However, in the presence of an

400

externally applied negative potential, the adsorption of the BSA was greatly suppressed and

401

fluorescence was barely visible. The applied potential was therefore successful in repelling the

402

BSA molecules from the membrane surface.

403 404

Figure 7: Protein adsorption on PES (a), Car-PES (b) and electrically charged Car-PES (c)

405

membranes 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 35


406

Effects of organic fouling on the performance of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged

407

Car-PES TFC membranes

408

Prior to the fouling test, a baseline experiment was also carried out using 4mM NaCl solution as

409

the feed solution and 2M NaCl as the draw solution, in order to correct for the effects of draw

410

solution dilution and feed solution concentration. The water flux during the 12 hour test was

411

approximately constant, and the final water flux through both membranes was about 94% of the

412

initial water flux (Figure S8). The organic fouling in FO was tested using a general model

413

organic foulant, alginic acid. With a pKa of 3.21, alginate acid could easily ionize in water to

414

provide an abundance of alginate anions. Prior to the addition of alginate, the membrane was

415

conditioned by running FO with a DI water feed for 1 h. After alginate fouling, the membrane

416

was washed with DI water for 1h, and the draw solution was restored to the initial concentration.

417

As shown in Figure 8, the water flux through the PES and Car-PES membranes decreased

418

significantly and immediately after the addition of alginate to the feed solution. The permeate

419

drag carried the alginate to the selective PA layer through the porous substrate; causing alginate

420

accumulation in the porous membrane substrate. The water flux through the PES and Car-PES

421

membranes declined gradually with the accumulation of alginate, and was about 42% and 48%

422

of the initial water flux respectively at the end of the test. The more severe fouling of the Car-

423

PES membrane could be associated with its slightly more hydrophobic character. By comparison

424

the Car-PES membrane with the application of a negative potential showed a much smaller water

425

flux decline (17 %) over the same period of time due to the like-charge repulsion between the

426

alginate anions and the externally applied potential. It should be noted that some positive ions

427

might adsorb on the membrane surface and neutralized part of the membrane surface charge45.

428

However, the experimental results showed that within the scope of this study, the application of a 23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 24 of 35

429

2V potential was sufficient to reject the anionic organic foulants even with the presence of

430

positive ions.

431 432

Figure 8: Comparison of membrane resistance to organic fouling in a feed solution with 400 ppm

433

alginate. The draw solution was 2M NaCl. The flow rates on both sides of the membrane were

434

0.1L/min.

435

The fouled membranes was washed with DI water for 1h, and then retested for their FO

436

performance using a DI water feed. Figure S9 shows the results of water recovery. The water

437

flux could return to 64% of its initial performance for the PES membrane. For the Car-PES

438

membrane, the value was about 60%. While the alginate on the membrane surface could be

439

removed by a washing regiment, the alginate within the porous membrane substrate could not.

440

On the contrary, the water flux for the electrically charged Car-PES membrane could be restored

441

to about 92% of its initial value, similar to the results of the baseline experiment (Figure S9).

442

This is indication that under an externally applied potential, alginate could only be loosely held 24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 35


443

by the membrane surface and as such was easily removable by physical washing. In addition, the

444

test for membrane selectivity showed that all three membranes could retain a good selectivity

445

(Figure S9). Therefore positive ions (Na+) that might have been accumulated on the membrane

446

surface under the applied negative potential could also be removed by a simple physical wash.

447

One of the concerns in the application of an external negative potential is Ca2+ adsorption which

448

could bridge between the organic foulant (alginate) to increase the severity of alginate gelation21,

449

57, 58

450

of a control and electrically-charged PVDF membranes with embedded CNTs. Even though Ca2+

451

could in principle accelerate the fouling of the CNTs-PVDF membranes, the authors found that

452

in practice, the electrically-induced surface charge was not effective for the Ca2+ bridging of

453

organic foulants; and hence there was no increase in the fouling of the electrically charged

454

membrane in the presence of Ca2+ 45.

455

There are reports in the literature where a positive potential was used for the oxidative killing of

456

bacteria and the inhibition of biofilm formation. In actual wastewater treatment, however, the

457

application of positive charge could worsen organic fouling due to the attractive forces between

458

the membrane and the foulants40, 50. In this study, a facile method was developed to prepare

459

carbon paper-PES membranes with high electrical conductivity and enhanced mechanical

460

properties and membrane integrity (stability). When a relatively small and negative potential

461

(2V) was applied to these membranes, the deposition and growth of both gram-positive and

462

gram-negative bacteria were inhibited, which could be attributed to the repulsive forces between

463

like charges and the possible presence of a microscopic amount of H2O2 formed by

464

electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction. This electrically charged composite membrane also

. Zhang et al. added Ca2+ to the test solution to examine their effects on the fouling behavior



Page 26 of 35

465

showed an increased resistance towards organic fouling as tested by the model foulant alginate.

466

The water flux decrease due to organic fouling was substantially reduced; and a very high water

467

flux recovery rate was possible after a simple physical wash. The experimental results indicated

468

that this membrane design approach (of forming TFC on an existing porous conductor rather

469

than trying to connect dispersed conductors in a polymer matrix) is effective for producing

470

energy efficient antifouling composite membranes which inhibit both microbial and organic

471

fouling with the application of a negative external potential.

472

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

473

Supporting Information: The Supporting Information is available free of charge via the Internet

474

at http://pubs.acs.org.

475

Details on the preparation process of PES and Car-PES substrates (Figure S1), the flow cell for

476

FO operations with an externally applied electric potential (Figure S2), the surface morphology

477

of carbon paper used in this study(Figure S3), surface morphology of the PA layer on PES and

478

Car-PES TFC membranes (Figure S4), effect of microbial fouling on the reverse salt flux of

479

PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES TFC membranes (Figure S5), base line

480

experiments using the LB solution and a 2M NaCl draw solution(Figure S6), water flux and

481

reverse salt flux of PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES membranes after continuous

482

microbial fouling and a brief physical wash(Figure S7), base line experiments using a 4mM

483

NaCl feed and a 2M NaCl draw solution (Figure S8), water flux and reverse salt flux of

484

organically fouled PES, Car-PES and electrically charged Car-PES membranes after a brief

485

physical wash(Figure S9), and properties of PES and Car-PES substrates (Table S1).

486 26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 35


487

AUTHOR INFORMATION

488

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4

489

Engineering Drive 4, 117585, Singapore Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:

490

Email: [email protected] & [email protected]

491

Notes

492

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

493

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

494

The authors would like to thank the Singapore National Research Foundation for funding this

495

study through the project “Advanced FO membranes and membrane systems for wastewater

496

treatment, water reuse and seawater desalination” (R-279-000-336-281). Thanks are also

497

extended to Professor Neal TS Chung for providing the experimental equipment.

498

REFERENCES

499

1.

500

Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Desalination 2012, 287, 78-81.

501

2.

502

Where are we now? Desalination 2015, 356, 271-284.

503

3.

504

osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, (23),

505

9824-30.

Chung, T.-S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, K. Y.; Su, J.; Ling, M. M., Forward osmosis processes:

Shaffer, D. L.; Werber, J. R.; Jaramillo, H.; Lin, S.; Elimelech, M., Forward osmosis:

Hoover, L. A.; Phillip, W. A.; Tiraferri, A.; Yip, N. Y.; Elimelech, M., Forward with



Page 28 of 35

506

4.

Zhao, S.; Zou, L.; Tang, C. Y.; Mulcahy, D., Recent developments in forward osmosis:

507

Opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci.2012, 396, 1-21.

508

5.

509

(FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). Sep. Purif .Technol. 2015, 156, 856-860.

510

6.

511

membranes: Integration of RO- and NF-like selective layers for enhanced organic fouling

512

resistance. J. Membr. Sci.2015, 492, 147-155.

513

7.

514

concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during

515

humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci.2010, 354, (1-2), 123-133.

516

8.

517

based on layer-by-layer assembly—FO performance and fouling behavior. J. Membr. Sci.2012,

518

405-406, 20-29.

519

9.

520

in forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci.2011, 382, (1-2), 308-315.

521

10.

522

membranes in forward osmosis processes. J. Membr. Sci.2016, 502, 65-75.

523

11.

524

polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)/polyacrylonitrile (PAN) hollow fiber membranes

525

for engineering osmosis processes. Desalination 2014, 335, (1), 17-26.

526

12.

527

concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci.2006, 284, (1-2),

528

237-247.

Chung, T.-S.; Luo, L.; Wan, C. F.; Cui, Y.; Amy, G., What is next for forward osmosis

Fang, W.; Liu, C.; Shi, L.; Wang, R., Composite forward osmosis hollow fiber

Tang, C. Y.; She, Q.; Lay, W. C. L.; Wang, R.; Fane, A. G., Coupled effects of internal

Qi, S.; Qiu, C. Q.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, C. Y., Double-skinned forward osmosis membranes

Zhao, S.; Zou, L.; Mulcahy, D., Effects of membrane orientation on process performance

Zhou, Z.; Lee, J. Y., Evaluating the viability of double-skin thin film composite

Chen, S. C.; Fu, X. Z.; Chung, T.-S., Fouling behaviors of polybenzimidazole (PBI)–

McCutcheon, J. R.; Elimelech, M., Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal


Page 29 of 35


529

13.

Gray, G. T.; McCutcheon, J. R.; Elimelech, M., Internal concentration polarization in

530

forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation. Desalination 2006, 197, (1-3), 1-8.

531

14.

532

permeable forward osmosis (FO) membranes for high osmotic pressure but viscous draw solutes.

533

J. Membr. Sci.2015, 496, 132-141.

534

15.

535

osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci.2010, 365, (1-2), 34-39.

536

16.

537

fouling resistance of forward osmosis membrane. Desalination 2013, 312, 82-87.

538

17.

539

osmosis: Measurements and mechanisms. J. Membr. Sci.2015, 493, 703-708.

540

18.

541

forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 325, 30-36.

542

19.

543

enhanced osmotic pressure. J. Membr. Sci.2007, 295, (1-2), 11-20.

544

20.

545

Divalent Cation Diffusion in Forward Osmosis Biofouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, (22),

546

13222-9.

547

21.

548

Pressure-Retarded Osmosis due to Irreversible Biofouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, (21),

549

13050-8.

550

22.

551

Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, (4), 2448-71.

Wei, R.; Zhang, S.; Cui, Y.; Ong, R. C.; Chung, T.-S.; Helmer, B. J.; de Wit, J. S., Highly

Lee, S.; Boo, C.; Elimelech, M.; Hong, S., Comparison of fouling behavior in forward

Nguyen, A.; Azari, S.; Zou, L., Coating zwitterionic amino acid l-DOPA to increase

Kwan, S. E.; Bar-Zeev, E.; Elimelech, M., Biofouling in forward osmosis and reverse

Yoon, H.; Baek, Y.; Yu, J.; Yoon, J., Biofouling occurrence process and its control in the

Herzberg, M.; Elimelech, M., Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Role of biofilm-

Xie, M.; Bar-Zeev, E.; Hashmi, S. M.; Nghiem, L. D.; Elimelech, M., Role of Reverse

Bar-Zeev, E.; Perreault, F.; Straub, A. P.; Elimelech, M., Impaired Performance of

Rana,

D.;

Matsuura,

T.,

Surface

modifications

for

antifouling

membranes.



Page 30 of 35

552

23.

Tiraferri, A.; Kang, Y.; Giannelis, E. P.; Elimelech, M., Highly Hydrophilic Thin-Film

553

Composite Forward Osmosis Membranes Functionalized with Surface-Tailored Nanoparticles.

554

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, (9), 5044-5053.

555

24.

556

composite forward osmosis membranes for organic fouling control: fouling behavior and

557

antifouling mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, (20), 11135-44.

558

25.

559

fabrication modification of forward osmosis membranes with a poly(ethylene glycol) block

560

copolymer for improved organic fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci.2015, 490, 209-219.

561

26.

562

membrane processes: A review. J. Membr. Sci.2016, 499, 201-233.

563

27.

564

osmosis hollow fiber membranes with antifouling NF-like selective layer. J. Membr. Sci.2012,

565

394-395, 80-88.

566

28.

567

grafted membranes for osmotic power generation from municipal wastewater. Water Res.2015,

568

89, 50-58.

569

29.

570

chemistry and nucleophilic substitution on nitrogen: A novel approach to enhance membrane

571

fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 449, 50-57.

572

30.

573

and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) surface modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis

574

membranes for organic fouling control. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 450, 331-339.

Tiraferri, A.; Kang, Y.; Giannelis, E. P.; Elimelech, M., Superhydrophilic thin-film

Shaffer, D. L.; Jaramillo, H.; Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S.; Lu, X.; Elimelech, M., Post-

She, Q.; Wang, R.; Fane, A. G.; Tang, C. Y., Membrane fouling in osmotically driven

Setiawan, L.; Wang, R.; Li, K.; Fane, A. G., Fabrication and characterization of forward

Li, X.; Cai, T.; Chen, C.; Chung, T. S., Negatively charged hyperbranched polyglycerol

Yu, H.-Y.; Kang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Mi, B., Grafting polyzwitterions onto polyamide by click

Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S.; Lu, X.; Shaffer, D. L.; Elimelech, M., Amine enrichment


Page 31 of 35


575

31.

Li, X.; Cai, T.; Chung, T. S., Anti-fouling behavior of hyperbranched polyglycerol-

576

grafted poly(ether sulfone) hollow fiber membranes for osmotic power generation. Environ. Sci.

577

Technol. 2014, 48, (16), 9898-907.

578

32.

579

film nanocomposite membrane in reducing organic fouling in forward osmosis process.

580

Desalination 2014, 348, 82-88.

581

33.

582

Elimelech, M., In situ formation of silver nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis

583

membranes for biofouling mitigation. Water Res.2014, 62, 260-70.

584

34.

585

Silver Decoration on Graphene Oxide-Treated Thin Film Composite Forward Osmosis

586

Membranes: Biocidal Properties and Regeneration Potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3,

587

(1), 13-18.

588

35.

589

Implications for Membrane Fouling Control in Engineered Osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016,

590

50, (2), 685-93.

591

36.

592

the Loading of Antimicrobial Ag Nanoparticles in Forward Osmosis Membranes. ACS Sustain.

593

Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, (11), 2959-2966.

594

37.

595

membrane for forward osmosis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, (13), 6781-6786.

Emadzadeh, D.; Lau, W. J.; Matsuura, T.; Hilal, N.; Ismail, A. F., The potential of thin

Ben-Sasson, M.; Lu, X.; Bar-Zeev, E.; Zodrow, K. R.; Nejati, S.; Qi, G.; Giannelis, E. P.;

Soroush, A.; Ma, W.; Cyr, M.; Rahaman, M. S.; Asadishad, B.; Tufenkji, N., In Situ

Hu, M.; Zheng, S.; Mi, B., Organic Fouling of Graphene Oxide Membranes and Its

Liu, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Qiu, G.; Li, J.; Xie, J.; Lee, J. Y., Surface Reaction Route To Increase

Li, J.; Yin, L.; Qiu, G.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Xie, J., A photo-bactericidal thin film composite



Page 32 of 35

596

38.

Liu, L.; Liu, J.; Gao, B.; Yang, F.; Chellam, S., Fouling reductions in a membrane

597

bioreactor using an intermittent electric field and cathodic membrane modified by vapor phase

598

polymerized pyrrole. J. Membr. Sci.2012, 394-395, 202-208.

599

39.

600

wastewater. Water Res.2003, 37, (4), 785-792.

601

40.

602

on electrically conducting carbon nanotube–polyvinyl alcohol composite ultrafiltration

603

membranes. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 468, 1-10.

604

41.

605

Inhibition through Low-Voltage Electrochemical Reactions on Electrically Conducting

606

Membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, (21), 12741-50.

607

42.

608

dual-layer CNT/PVDF membrane for electrically-enhanced fouling resistance. J. Membr.

609

Sci.2015, 491, 37-44.

610

43.

611

Electrochemical multiwalled carbon nanotube filter for viral and bacterial removal and

612

inactivation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, (8), 3672-9.

613

44.

614

wastewater and prevention of biofouling by UV/electrolysis hybrid technology: influence factors

615

and limits for domestic wastewater reuse. Water Res. 2014, 52, 20-8.

616

45.

617

fouling reduction. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 459, 143-156.

Yang, G. C. C.; Yang, T. Y.; Tsai, S. H., Crossflow electro-microfiltration of oxide-CMP

Dudchenko, A. V.; Rolf, J.; Russell, K.; Duan, W.; Jassby, D., Organic fouling inhibition

Ronen, A.; Duan, W.; Wheeldon, I.; Walker, S.; Jassby, D., Microbial Attachment

Wang, S.; Liang, S.; Liang, P.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Wu, S.; Huang, X., In-situ combined

Vecitis, C. D.; Schnoor, M. H.; Rahaman, M. S.; Schiffman, J. D.; Elimelech, M.,

Haaken, D.; Dittmar, T.; Schmalz, V.; Worch, E., Disinfection of biologically treated

Zhang, Q.; Vecitis, C. D., Conductive CNT-PVDF membrane for capacitive organic


Page 33 of 35


618

46.

Liu, C.; Xie, X.; Zhao, W.; Liu, N.; Maraccini, P. A.; Sassoubre, L. M.; Boehm, A. B.;

619

Cui, Y., Conducting nanosponge electroporation for affordable and high-efficiency disinfection

620

of bacteria and viruses in water. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, (9), 4288-93.

621

47.

622

single-pass sequential reduction–oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, (17), 6185.

623

48.

624

biofouling prevention by electrically charged nanocomposite polymer thin film membranes.

625

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, (6), 2760-8.

626

49.

627

conductive polymer–multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposite membrane. J. Membr.

628

Sci.2012, 415-416, 718-724.

629

50.

630

A.; Matsumoto, M.; Jassby, D., Treating Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor Effluent with

631

Electrically Conducting Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Membranes for Fouling Control. J.

632

Membr. Sci. 2016,504,104-112.

633

51.

634

Development of a membrane–carbon cloth assembly for submerged membrane bioreactors to

635

apply an intermittent electric field for fouling suppression. Sep. Purif .Technol. 2012, 88, 202-

636

207.

637

52.

638

hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water

639

production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, (13), 7358-65.

Gao, G.; Zhang, Q.; Vecitis, C. D., CNT–PVDF composite flow-through electrode for

de Lannoy, C. F.; Jassby, D.; Gloe, K.; Gordon, A. D.; Wiesner, M. R., Aquatic

de Lannoy, C. F.; Jassby, D.; Davis, D. D.; Wiesner, M. R., A highly electrically

Duan, W.; Ronen, A.; de Leon, J. V.; Dudchenko, A.; Yao, S.; Corbala-Delgado, J.; Yan,

Akamatsu, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Suzaki, T.; Sakai, Y.; Nagamoto, H.; Nakao, S.-i.,

Sukitpaneenit, P.; Chung, T. S., High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis



Page 34 of 35

640

53.

McCutcheon, J. R.; Elimelech, M., Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity

641

on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci.2008, 318, (1-2), 458-

642

466.

643

54.

644

membranes based on carboxylated polysulfone microporous support membranes for forward

645

osmosis. J. Membr. Sci.2013, 445, 220-227.

646

55.

647

and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic

648

nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization. J. Membr. Sci.2014, 449,

649

74-85.

650

56.

651

electric currents on bacterial detachment and inactivation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100, (2),

652

379-386.

653

57.

654

osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci.2008, 320, (1-2), 292-302.

655

58.

656

membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. Water Res. 2012, 46, (7), 2478-86.

Cho, Y. H.; Han, J.; Han, S.; Guiver, M. D.; Park, H. B., Polyamide thin-film composite

Emadzadeh, D.; Lau, W. J.; Matsuura, T.; Ismail, A. F.; Rahbari-Sisakht, M., Synthesis

Hong, S. H.; Jeong, J.; Shim, S.; Kang, H.; Kwon, S.; Ahn, K. H.; Yoon, J., Effect of

Mi, B.; Elimelech, M., Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward

She, Q.; Jin, X.; Li, Q.; Tang, C. Y., Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to


Page 35 of 35


TOC art 84x47mm (300 x 300 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

An Effective Design of Electrically Conducting Thin-Film Composite

Recommend Documents