An inexpensive lecture feedback system

The show of hands has the disadvantage that the student who is uncertain is not likely ... cards made by cutting old 80 column computer cards into thi...
0 downloads 0 Views 307KB Size
An Inexpensive Lecture Feedback System A problem with large lecture groups (over 100 students) is that i t is often difficult for the lecturer to know whether he is heing understood or for the student t o judge his level of understanding of the lecture. Feedback devices have been described in the literature and may range from elaborate systems with response buttons a t each student position1 to a show of hands to a question. The former method is versatile and gives the lecturer an accurate assessment of understanding, hut i t necessarily requires a considerable capital outlay. The show of hands has the disadvantage that the student who is uncertain is not likely t o respond. A show of hands for successive multiple choice questions is also time consuming and i t is not always easy to compare correct responses. A number of inexpensive devices for "private" response have been described, e.g., the Cosfard cuhez with colored faces on a cube. This can he held up so that essentially only the lecturer sees the response color. A simple and inexpensive variant on this, which has been used with classes of up to about 200 for a number of years, is a set of 5 colored cards made by cutting old 80 column computer cards into thirds. A set of these is given to the students a t the start of the course. They are easily kept with the students lecture note pad and are therefore readily accessible for use with a minimum of disruption to the lecture. The colors can he chosen to he sufficiently different so that the lecturer can see the range of responses to a n objective question a t a glance.

W. R., Lagowski J. J., O'Connor R., J. CHEM. EDUC., 45,63,1968. Taplin G., Industrial Traininglnternational, 4,218, 1969.

1 Barnard 2

Monash Cniversily Wellington Road ('layton. Virturia 316% Australia

E. K. Nunn

Volume 52, Number 7. July 1975 / 433