Anthropogenic 236U in the North Sea – A Closer Look into a Source

Oct 9, 2017 - Marcus Christl† , Núria Casacuberta†‡ , Johannes Lachner†∥, Jürgen Herrmann§, and Hans-Arno ... Liang, Liu, Singletary, Wan...
0 downloads 0 Views 916KB Size
Subscriber access provided by LAURENTIAN UNIV

Article 236

Anthropogenic U in the North Sea – a closer look into a source region Marcus Christl, Núria Casacuberta, Johannes Lachner, Jürgen Herrmann, and Hans-Arno Synal Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03168 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 13, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Anthropogenic 236U in the North Sea – a closer look

2

into a source region

3

Marcus Christl1*, Núria Casacuberta1,2, Johannes Lachner1†, Jürgen Herrmann3, Hans-Arno-

4

Synal1

5 6

1

Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland

7

2

Environmental Physics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

8

3

Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie, 22589 Hamburg, Germany

9



present address: Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 17, A-1090

10

Vienna, Austria

11

*

12

Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Otto Stern Weg 5, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland

13

([email protected])

author to whom correspondence should be addressed: Marcus Christl, ETH Zurich,

14 15

KEYWORDS: Anthropogenic radionuclides, Uranium-236, North Sea, nuclear reprocessing.

16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 28

17

ABSTRACT In this study we present new sea water data of 236U and 238U sampled in the North

18

Sea in 2010. The North Sea has been and is still receiving a considerable input of anthropogenic

19

radionuclides from nuclear reprocessing facilities located in La Hague (France) and Sellafield

20

(Great Britain). It therefore represents an important source region for oceanographic tracer

21

studies using the transient signal of anthropogenic

22

236

23

covers the transition regions of the North Sea to the Atlantic Ocean, to the Baltic Sea, and

24

upstream the Elbe River. It is discussed in the context of available 236U data from literature. Our

25

results show that both,

26

Sea can be explained by simple binary mixing models implying that 236U behaves conservatively

27

in seawater. We further show that the input of

28

might be a maximum input of 12 g/yr via the Baltic Sea. The results of the mixing models

29

suggest that the source of this still unidentified

30

water input.

236

U. A proper knowledge of the sources of

U is an essential prerequisite for such tracer studies. The

236

U concentrations and

236

236

236

U data set presented in this study

U/238U ratios in surface waters of the North

U by the Elbe River is negligible while there

236

U contamination could be supplied by fresh

31

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 28

32

Environmental Science & Technology

Introduction

33

Anthropogenic 236U (T½ = 23.5 Myr) is mainly produced in nuclear reactors by thermal

34

neutron capture on 235U ((n, γ)–reaction) or in nuclear explosions by the interaction of fast

35

neutrons with 238U (via a (n, 3n)-reaction).1, 2 About 1000 kg of 236U have been produced

36

globally during the period of atmospheric nuclear bomb tests, reaching a peak in atmospheric

37

deposition in the early/mid 1960ies.3, 4 Another about 100 kg 236U have been discharged locally

38

into the North East Atlantic Ocean by nuclear reprocessing facilities with peak discharges

39

occurring between 1980 and 2000.5

40

In recent years, several studies investigated the potential of anthropogenic 236U as a new tracer

41

in oceanography 6-16 and strongly promoted its use (also in combination with other anthropogenic

42

tracers such as 129I) to assess water mass flow and mixing patterns and/or to estimate timescales

43

of water mass movements.5, 7, 11 In this context, the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans have been

44

identified as key study areas because of their sensitive response to climate change and their

45

important role in thermohaline circulation.11, 17-19 The surface waters in the North Atlantic and

46

Arctic Oceans may contain high levels of anthropogenic radionuclides such as 3H, 90Sr, 99Tc,

47

137

48

reprocessing facilities La Hague (LH), France and Sellafield (SF), Great Britain (Figure 1). The

49

temporally variable and point-like release of different radioactive contaminants from LH and SF

50

into the ocean has been exploited in several studies to investigate the timescales of water mass

51

dispersion into adjacent ocean basins.20-26 Recent studies confirm that elevated concentrations of

52

236

Cs, 129I, 236U, and transuranic actinides20 originating from the two Northwest European nuclear

U (above global fallout levels) found in the North Sea, in the Atlantic surface waters of the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Environmental Science & Technology

53

Arctic Ocean, and in the overflow waters of Denmark Strait can be explained by the addition of

54

236

55

Page 4 of 28

U released from the European nuclear reprocessing facilities.11, 14, 17

A strong argument for adding 236U to the existing suite of powerful ocean tracers is based on

56

its conservative nature and the fact that the behavior of naturally occurring U-isotopes in the

57

ocean is well understood.27 Natural U is present in open ocean sea water at concentrations of

58

about 3.3 ppb (µg/l) and its conservative behavior is well-known.28 As a consequence, a strong

59

correlation of natural U with salinity is observed in oxygenated ocean water.29, 30 The addition of

60

anthropogenic 236U into the surface ocean by global fallout or nuclear reprocessing does/did not

61

significantly change the 238U content of sea water. This simple input scenario for 236U implies

62

that the isotopic ratio 236U/238U and 236U concentrations in ocean water are linearly correlated.

63

However, the correlation breaks down if 236U is added to sea water from other sources that

64

influence both, 236U and 238U concentrations. The dominant source of natural U for the oceans is

65

river runoff27 and typical natural U concentrations between 0.4 and 2 µg/L are reported for rivers

66

in Western Europe.31 It is still an open question how much anthropogenic 236U is transported into

67

the oceans by rivers because river data is lacking. Elevated levels of 236U/238U have been found

68

in Austrian river waters (all draining into the Black Sea) and were attributed to global fallout

69

and/or to fallout from the Chernobyl accident.32

70

To apply 236U/238U as a reliable transient oceanic tracer the sources of 236U and therefore the

71

input function have to be properly known. Significant effort has already been devoted to assess

72

the sources and the distribution of 236U in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean in order to

73

develop the application of anthropogenic 236U as new transient tracer.11, 13, 14, 17 It has been shown

74

that releases from nuclear reprocessing (SF plus LH) raised 236U/238U levels in the North Sea by

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

75

more than one order of magnitude above global fallout (GF) levels of about 1 x 10-9.13, 14

76

Furthermore, a first (model based) reconstruction of the combined 236U input from the nuclear

77

reprocessing facilities LH and SF has been presented (black line in Figure 2).5 According to the

78

model results the 236U input from 1965 to 2012 from LH amounts to less than 25kg (and 62±31

79

kg from SF). This reconstruction still has some uncertainties because a substantial data basis

80

only exists for 236U releases from LH, while it is extremely scarce for SF. Therefore, the

81

236

82

function for the SF branch waters (red and blue lines in Figure 2, adapted from ref. 5).

83

Nevertheless, the above results show that water masses labeled with 236U in the North Sea region

84

after ~1980 by one of the reprocessing facilities (LH and/or SF) are clearly distinguishable from

85

Atlantic waters that carry the GF signal only. It is, however, not possible to track a single

86

reprocessing signal on its way through the Arctic Ocean because the characteristic 236U/238U ratio

87

is modified while waters disperse and mix with surrounding ocean water carrying different

88

236

89

as an extension of the 236U/238U tracer method.11 In this study, we focus on the tracer application

90

of 236U/238U and on possible 236U sources in the North Sea region.

91

U/238U input function for the LH-branch waters is considered more reliable than the input

U/238U ratios. To overcome this problem, the combination of 236U with 129I has been suggested

The model based input function5 of 236U still needs to be confirmed by historical 236U data.

92

Additionally, other potential sources of 236U in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean need to be

93

identified or excluded. For example, a recent study presenting first data from the Baltic Sea

94

suggests the presence of an additional yet unidentified source of 236U.33 Furthermore, it is still

95

unknown if and in case how much 236U is entering the North Sea from rivers. For example, the

96

Elbe River is draining the waters from large abandoned U mining areas in the Western Ore

97

Mountains (Eastern Germany) and also hosts 5 nuclear reactors along its course. However, it is

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Environmental Science & Technology

98

not expected that nuclear reactors contribute significantly to the 236U budget in the North Sea as

99

no accidental releases of 236U from nuclear reactors in Western Europe are documented. In

100

contrast, the input of natural U (including some 236U) from former U-mining areas can be

101

significant.

Page 6 of 28

102

In this paper we present new 236U data from the North Sea sampled in 2010. The new data set

103

covers three important hydrographic transitions: (i) to the open Atlantic Ocean in the North, (ii)

104

to the Baltic Sea in the East, and (iii) to the Elbe River in the Southeast. The data set

105

complements existing 236U data from the North Sea13, 14 and the Baltic Sea33 and therefore allows

106

presenting a comprehensive picture of 236U in this region including a discussion of possible

107

additional sources of 236U entering the North Sea via the Baltic Sea and/or the Elbe River. By

108

combining our data with data from literature, we will show that both, the observed 236U

109

concentrations, and 236U/238U ratios can be explained by simple binary mixing of water masses.

110

Material and Methods

111

Hydrography of the North Sea

112

The North Sea is a shallow marginal sea that is connected to the North Atlantic Ocean via the

113

narrow Dover Strait in the Southwest and via a broad opening in the North (Figure 1). Its

114

complex hydrographic situation is mainly characterized by the inflow of saline Atlantic Waters,

115

contributions of less saline waters entering from Baltic Sea via Kattegat and Skagerrak, and the

116

inflow of fresh waters from rivers and net precipitation. The resulting distribution of salinity is

117

temporally stable and, forced by the prevailing westerlies, a mean cyclonic circulation pattern

118

builds up in the North Sea34 (Figure 1). In Fall/Winter 2009 exceptionally strong cyclonic

119

circulation was observed resulting in an enhanced inflow of Atlantic waters via the English

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

120

Channel (peak flow: 1 Sv = 106 m3/s) and an increased outflow of Baltic Sea waters in early

121

201034.

122

The state of the North Sea is intensely monitored by the riparian countries that are maintaining a

123

dense observational network. In this context, annual sampling campaigns are carried out by the

124

BSH (Germany) to document the standard oceanographic parameters but also to monitor

125

chemical and radioactive pollutants (such as nutrients, organic compounds, metals, 3H, 137Cs,

126

90

127

period 2008-2011 are summarized in a comprehensive report on the state of the North Sea that

128

also covers the time period of this study34.

129

The radionuclide signal from the reprocessing facilities SF and LH enters the North Sea mainly

130

via the Scottish Coastal Current and the English Channel Current, respectively (SCC, ECC in

131

Figure 1). Model based reconstructions of the 236U/238U ratios in those currents together with the

132

global fallout signal (as extracted from ref. 5) are presented in Figure 2.

133

Sample location, preparation, and measurement of 236U

134

During the North Sea summer survey carried out with R/V Pelagia (PE232) by the Federal

135

Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) in August 2010 several large volume water samples

136

were collected from 80 different stations (70l for 90Sr, 100l for transuranic actinides, 100-150l

137

for 137Cs)35. Since it was initially not planned to analyze 236U/238U no separate water samples

138

were collected for U-analysis. However, U extraction could be performed on fifty 8-24l samples

139

of previously untreated surface water that was left over from 90Sr sample preparation (sample

140

locations are shown in Figure 1). To investigate possible contributions of 236U and 238U

Sr, and several isotopes of the transuranic elements Pu, Am, and Cm). The results of the survey

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

7

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 8 of 28

141

transported by the Elbe River two samples were collected in upstream direction (Stations “Stade”

142

and “Medem” in Table S2).

143

At BSH Hamburg, the unfiltered seawater samples were acidified with a few ml of conc. HNO3,

144

about 10 pg of a 233U spike (IRMM058) and about 500 mg of a (previously U-cleaned) iron

145

nitrate solution was added. After equilibration (typically over night) NH4OH was added and U

146

was co-precipitated together with the Fe-hydroxide. U-separation and AMS target preparation

147

was carried out at ETH Zurich using previously described methods.14, 17

148

233

149

(AMS) at ETH Zurich using previously described methods.13 Measured 233U/238U and 236U/233U

150

ratios were normalized to the ETH Zurich in house standard ZUTRI36 and blank corrected. 236U

151

and 238U concentrations were calculated from the known amount of 233U spike. 236U and 238U

152

concentrations, the 236U/238U ratio and the associated combined uncertainties are reported in

153

Table S2. The typical 1σ uncertainty of the 236U and 238U data is between 2% and 5%. Full-

154

process blanks prepared from spiked MilliQ water contained less than 1 fg (