Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
Antihypertensive effects, molecular docking study and isothermal titration calorimetry assay of the angiotensin Iconverting enzyme inhibitory peptides from Chlorella vulgaris Jingli Xie, Xujun Chen, Junjie Wu, Yanyan Zhang, Yan Zhou, Lujia Zhang, Yajie Tang, and Dong-Zhi Wei J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04294 • Publication Date (Web): 18 Jan 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 19, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Antihypertensive effects, molecular docking study and isothermal titration
2
calorimetry assay of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides
3
from Chlorella vulgaris
4
Jingli Xie†, ¶, *, Xujun Chen†, Junjie Wu†, Yanyan Zhang♣, Yan Zhou†, Lujia Zhang†, Yajie Tang‡,
5
Dongzhi Wei†, ¶, *
6
†
7
School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237,
8
People’s Republic of China
9
‡
State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, Department of Food Science and Technology,
Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Hubei Provincial
10
Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation, Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial
11
Microbiology, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, People’s Republic of China
12
♣
13
Republic of China
14
¶
15
People’s Republic of China
16
* Corresponding author. Mail: P.O. Box 283, East China University of Science and Technology, 130
17
Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, People’s Republic of China. Tel: +86-21-64251803; Fax:
18
+86-21-64251803; E-mail address:
[email protected] (J. Xie);
[email protected] (D. Wei)
Department of Food Science, Shanghai Business School, Shanghai 200235, China People’s
Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomanufacturing (SCICB), Shanghai 200237,
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 1
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
20 21
Abstract The aim of this work is to explore angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides
22
from Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) and discover the inhibitory mechanism of the peptides. After C.
23
vulgaris proteins were gastrointestinal digested in silico, several ACE inhibitory peptides with
24
C-terminal tryptophan were screened. Among them, two novel non-competitive ACE inhibitors,
25
Thr-Thr-Trp (TTW) and Val-His-Trp (VHW), exhibited the highest inhibitory activity indicated by
26
IC50 values, 0.61 ± 0.12 and 0.91 ± 0.31 µM respectively. Both the peptides were demonstrated
27
stable against gastrointestinal digestion and ACE hydrolysis. The peptides were administrated to
28
spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) in the dose 5 mg/Kg body weight, and VHW could decrease
29
50 mmHg systolic blood pressure of SHRs (p < 0.05). Molecular docking displayed that both TTW
30
and VHW formed six hydrogen bonds with active site pockets of ACE. Besides, isothermal titration
31
calorimetry assay discovered that VHW could form more stable complex with ACE than TTW.
32
Therefore, VHW was an excellent ACE inhibitor.
33
Keywords: Chlorella vulgaris; ACE inhibitory peptides; antihypertensive activity; molecular
34
docking; isothermal titration calorimetry
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 2
Page 2 of 39
Page 3 of 39
36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
INTRODUCTION
37
Microalgae species, Spirulina, Chlorella, Dunaliella, Haematococcus, and Schizochytrium, are
38
recognized as GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe) food sources according to the GRAS category
39
issued by the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration).1 Among these microalgae, the most
40
commonly used ones are Chlorella and Spirulina. Chlorella vulgaris, a kind of green microalgae
41
which have a relative long history as food, is famous for its prominent nutritional value, such as 55–
42
67% protein, 9–18% dietary fiber, 1–4% chlorophyll and plenty of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids, minerals
43
and vitamins.2-5 In the nutraceutical market of U.S., China, Japan and other countries, Chlorella is a
44
widely accepted health food or health supplement.5 Notably, the Chlorella’s protein is composed of
45
all the essential amino acids for humans and animals,2-4 which indicates that Chlorella protein is with
46
good nutritional quality. Bioactivities associated with Chlorella proteins, protein hydrolysate and
47
peptides, according to the review of Samarakoon and Jeon, include anti-oxidative activity in vitro,
48
angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE, EC 3.4.15.1) inhibitory activity in vitro, antiproliferation
49
activity in vivo, and immune-stimulant activity in vivo.6 Several ACE inhibitory peptides were
50
identified from C. vulgaris or its industrial by-products. Their molecular size ranged from 3 amino
51
acid residues to hendeca-peptide, and ACE inhibitory IC50 value ranged from 11.4 to 315 µM.7, 8
52
These reports suggested C. vulgaris might be a fine resource of ACE inhibitory peptides.
53
Unfortunately, the information of antihypertensive activity in vivo of such reported peptides is absent,
54
which may hinder the application of C. vulgaris in hypertension.
55
ACE is a ubiquitous enzyme in mammalian tissues involved in the renin-angiotensin system and
56
kinin nitric oxide system, and considered as a useful therapy target for treating hypertension9-11. A
57
large number of drugs such as captopril, lisinopril, enalapril, ramipril were developed as orally drugs
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 3
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
58
to treat hypertension with potent and highly selective ACE inhibitory activity. At same time,
59
food-derived biologically active peptides with the same function as drugs were also focused, because
60
of their natural origin and safety. Studies have shown that bioactive peptides as natural active
61
ingredients may offer therapeutic value for either prevention of disease or reducing symptoms.12 The
62
cardioprotective bioactive peptides from foods have already been reported with lots of potential
63
health benefits, among which, the effects on control and regulation of blood pressure of such
64
peptides are most prominent.13 Therefore, ACE inhibitory peptides used in the treatment of
65
antihypertension have been the most intensively studied over the last few decades.14
66
In more recent, due to the developments in the fields of computational biology and structural
67
biology, as well as the elucidation of ACE structure, the molecular docking becomes a frequently
68
used tool for the mechanism illustration of ACE inhibitory peptides.15-19 It is an efficient and
69
convenient tool to illustrate the structure details of the ligand-receptor complex, including the
70
conformation and interactions. However, docking procedure is a molecular simulation method. To
71
get more accurate binding information between the inhibitor and ACE, experimental means is
72
necessary. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), a method for full thermodynamic characterization
73
of an interaction, can be used under unrestricted molecular size, shape or chemical compostion.
74
Furthermore, ITC data underpin understanding the correlation between thermodynamic parameters
75
and molecular structural specifics correlated with a change from one state to another.20 Therefore,
76
ITC experiment was once carried out for the admeasurement of the inhibition mode of
77
Thr-Pro-Thr-Gln-Gln-Ser, an ACE inhibitory peptide purified from yeast.21 Thus, ITC may be a
78
useful method to describe the inhibitory mechanism of ACE inhibitory peptide combined with
79
molecular docking.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 4
Page 4 of 39
Page 5 of 39
80
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
In present study, several ACE inhibitory peptides were in silico screened from the products
81
generated by virtual gastrointestinal digestion of the proteins from C. vulgaris. Then, the stability of
82
such peptides against gastrointestinal digestion and ACE hydrolysis were assessed. The
83
antihypertensive activity of the peptides were in vivo tested on spontaneously hypertensive rats
84
(SHRs). Finally, the mechanism of ACE inhibition was studied from the angles of binding structure
85
and thermodynamic nature through molecular docking and ITC assay.
86 87 88
MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals. The enzyme ACE (10 U/mg protein) from rabbit lung, and its substrate
89
hippuryl-histidyl-leucine (HHL); the enzymes for the hydrolysis, pepsin (EC 3.4.23.1, 503 U/mg
90
solid) and porcine pancreatin (8 × USP) were supplied by Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO,
91
USA). Acetonitrile as mobile phase used in high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were
92
from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Lisinopril (95% purity) was purchased from Sangon
93
Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals used in this study were analytical grade.
94
Virtually Gastrointestinal Digestion of C. vulgaris Proteins. Forty three piece of C. vulgaris
95
proteins were selected from the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/) for this study. The
96
information of such proteins, such as entry name, length and molecular weight obtained from
97
UniProt were shown in Table 1.
98 99
Above proteins were virtually gastrointestinal digested by pepsin (pH < 2), trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4), and chymotrypsin (EC 3.4.21.1) with BIOPEP
100
(http://www.uwm.edu.pl/biochemia/index.php/pl/biopep). Then di- and tri-peptides were picked out
101
to compose a peptide library. ChemBioDraw Ultra 11.0 was used to generate structures of such di-
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 5
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
102
and tri-peptides, and energy was minimized with the consistent force field (CFF, force fields
103
adapting to organic compounds).
104
Screening of ACE Inhibitory Peptides. LibDock, a usually used module of Discovery Studio 3.5
105
software (DS 3.5, Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA), was used as molecular docking tool. In the
106
docking experiment, the crystal structure of human tACE (PDB ID: 1O8A,
107
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1O8A) in the presence of cofactors (zinc
108
and chloride ions) was as the binding receptor for the di- and tri-peptides. Rigid residues were
109
residues within the sphere with 10Å radius and zinc as the center. The site sphere was generated by
110
the selected rigid residues. The docking parameters are listed in Table 2. After the LibDock scores
111
were obtained, the ACE inhibitory IC50 were predicted according to the relationship between
112
Libdock score and IC50 value previously proposed by Wu et al.22
113
Peptides Synthesis. Peptides synthesis were carried out by Synpeptide Co., Ltd. (Shanghai,
114
China). The purity of the peptides was ≥ 95%, which was verified by HPLC (LC-20A, Shimadzu Co.
115
Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) with a column (Inertsil ODS-SP: 4.6 mm × 250 mm × 5µm, Shimadzu Co. Ltd.,
116
Kyoto, Japan). Molecular weight of the peptides was determined by electrospray ion trap mass
117
spectrometry (LCQ Deca XP MAX, ThermoFinnigan, St. Clara, CA, USA).
118
Measurement of ACE Inhibition. ACE inhibition was assayed according to Cushman and
119
Cheung.23. ACE was dissolved in 100 mM sodium borate buffer (pH 8.3) to 310 mU/mL for the
120
assay. Synthetic peptides were dissolved in distilled water to seven concentration levels. A certain
121
concentration of peptide (25 µL) was mixed with ACE solution (10 µL). The mixture was
122
pre-incubated at 37 °C for 5 min, then the addition of 50 µL of 5 mM HHL (100 mM sodium borate
123
buffer, pH 8.3) started the reaction. The reaction was maintained at 37 °C for 1 h, then 500 µL 1 M
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 6
Page 6 of 39
Page 7 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
124
HCl was added to stop the reaction. Ten microliters of the reaction solution was injected into a
125
RP-HPLC (LC1200, Agilent Technologies Inc, St. Clara, CA, USA) fixed with a Thermo BDS-C18
126
column (3.0 mm × 250 mm × 5 µm, Thermo Scientific Co. Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA). The mobile
127
phase (acetonitrile : water = 2:8 (v/v), with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) flew in the rate of 0.8 mL/min.
128
The absorbance was detected at 228 nm. All determinations were triplicate. The activity of ACE
129
inhibition was calculated as following. ACE inhibitory activity (%) =
− × 100%
130
Where AInhibitor is the relative area of the hippuric acid (HA) peak obtained from the reaction of
131
ACE and HHL with inhibitor. And AControl is the relative area of the hippuric acid (HA) peak obtained
132
from the reaction of ACE and HHL without inhibitor. IC50 value is defined as the concentration of
133
peptide that can inhibit half of the ACE activity.
134
Determination of Inhibitory Pattern. Peptide solutions in 1 mg/mL and 0.5 mg/mL, and HHL in
135
4 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL were used. Twenty five microliters of peptide solution was mixed
136
with ACE as referred in above section. The ACE inhibition was assayed under different level of HHL.
137
Lineweaver-Burk plots was used to confirm ACE inhibitory pattern of the peptides. The inhibitory
138
constant (Ki) was the intercept of X-axis of the plot of which the Y-axis displayed the slopes of
139
Lineweaver-Burk line and the X-axis indicated peptide concentrations.23
140
Gastrointestinal Stability of Peptides. Gastrointestinal stability of peptides was evaluated in
141
vitro.24, 25 Peptides was dissolved in 0.1 M KCl-HCl buffer (pH 2.0) to the concentration 0.1 mg/mL
142
and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively. Pepsin (503 U/mg) was added to peptide solution to the final
143
concentration of 0.4 mg/mL, then the mixture was digested at 37 °C for 4 h. After the reaction was
144
terminated by boiling for 15 min, pH of the reaction solution was adjusted to 7.0 with 1 M NaOH.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 7
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
145
The reaction solution was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. One milliliter of the supernatant was
146
taken for the determination of ACE inhibition. The rest supernatant further reacted with pancreatin
147
(10 mg/mL, 8 × USP) at 37 °C for another 4 h. The reaction was also stopped by boiling for 15 min
148
and then the reaction solution was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. This supernatant was also
149
used to detect ACE inhibition. Stability of Peptides against ACE. The stability of peptides against ACE was assessed in vitro.26,
150 151
27
152
borate buffer, pH 8.3) at 37 °C for 24 h, respectively. The enzyme was inactivated by boiling for 10
153
min. Then the ACE inhibitory activity was measured.
199
Each peptides (30 µL, 0.1 mg/mL) was incubated with 100 µL ACE (310 mU/mL with 100 mM
Antihypertensive Effect on SHRs. SHR/NCrlVr (male,10-week-old, 250-320 g body weight,
200
specific pathogen-free) were obtained from Vital River Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).
201
SHRs were randomly separated into a control group, a positive group, and two experiment groups.
202
There were six SHRs in each group. The rats were housed under 12 h day/night cycle at 22 ± 2 °C,
203
and accessed regular laboratory diet (SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. according
204
to “Laboratory Animal-Nutrients for Formula Feeds, GB14924.3-2010” standard issued by National
205
Technical Committee for Standardization of Laboratory Animals, China) and tap water ad libitum.
206
After the tail systolic blood pressure (SBP) of animal was above 180 mmHg, the gavage
207
administration could start. The animal experiment was carried out following the ethics guidelines
208
approved by the Shanghai Laboratory Animal Administration Office by Laboratorial Animal Center
209
of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
210
Normal saline was used as both solvent of synthesized peptides and the control reagent for gavage
211
administration. The dosage of peptides was 5 mg/kg body weight for the two experiment groups, and
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 8
Page 8 of 39
Page 9 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
212
same dose of Lisinopril for the positive group and the same volume of normal saline for the control
213
group. Tail-cuff method was performed for SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurement
214
with an ALC-NIBP-TY2928 BP system (Alcott Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The measuring
215
points are just before oral gavage (0 h), and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after the administration. Before each
216
measurement, SHRs were always warmed up in a 37 °C thermostat chamber for 10 min.
217
Molecular Docking of Peptide with Human ACE. The docking condition was similar as above
218
illustration. The best pose of each peptide binding with crystal structure of human tACE (PDB ID:
219
1O8A) was established according to LibDock score and binding energy. Interactions between the
220
peptide and ACE, including van der Waals force, coordination interaction and secondary forces such
221
as hydrogen bonds, electrostatic, hydrophobic, hydrophilic forces, were identified.
222
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Binding Assays. Assays were performed using an iTC200
223
microcalorimeter (General Electric, Fairfield, CT, USA) and according to the guidelines in the
224
iTC200 microcalorimeter user manual. tACE (2 U/mg, 50 mM borate buffer with 300 mM NaCl, pH
225
8.3) was heterologous expressed by sf 9 cells and purified by affinity chromatography. The peptides
226
were dissolved in the same buffer as that of tACE. The reaction cell was maintained at 25 °C, with
227
the peptide concentration in the syringe as 800 to 1400 nM, and the ACE concentration in the cell as
228
80 to 140 nM. Then heat of the reaction was measured. Thermodynamic parameters (∆G, ∆H, and
229
∆S) and dissociation constant Kd of the reaction were calculated using Origin 7.0 with the iTC200
230
MicroCal Software Addon.
231
Statistical analysis. All results were displayed as mean value ± standard deviation (SD) of
232
triplicate. ANOVA one-way analysis with Minitab v17 (Minitab Ltd., UK) was used for statistical
233
treatment of data. A Tukey pairwise comparison was used to compare the means and identify the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 9
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
234
differences. Significant difference was taken into account when p value was below 0.05.
235 236 237
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Pool of Di- and Tri-Peptide. Total 4,334 pieces of peptides (including all repetitive and
238
non-repetitive peptides) were produced when the selected C. vulgaris proteins were in silico digested
239
by gastrointestinal enzymes with BIOPEP (Figure 1). Among these peptides, 468 pieces of
240
non-repetitive di- and tri-peptide were chosen for a peptide library for the screening of ACE
241
inhibitory peptides in silico. ACE inhibitory peptides with higher activity usually have the C-terminal
242
residue such as hydrophobic, large steric, aromatic amino acids with a polar functional group.28
243
According to the sequence analysis of the 468 pieces of peptides, the statistical results of C-terminus
244
were 31.3% Phe, 17.8% Tyr, 13.9% Trp, 10.4% Leu and 8.7% Ala, respectively. Thus, the possibility
245
to harvest potent ACE inhibitory peptides from this peptide library is predictable.
246
Screening of the ACE Inhibitory Peptides. LibDock was used in the ACE inhibitory peptides
247
screening. About 48.8% of the peptides had LibDock scores greater than 100 (data not shown),
248
which indicated that these peptides were more likely to have lower IC50 according to the relation
249
between Libdock score and IC50, Libdock score = 10.063 lg (1/IC50) + 68.08.22 The other principle
250
for the screening was the type of C-terminal amino acid. Aromatic or cyclic amino acids like Trp, Tyr
251
and Pro were the most common C-terminal residues found in the structure of highly active ACE
252
inhibitors.29, 30 For instance, a piece of designed peptide, Val-Lys-Trp, was reported with IC50 of
253
0.020 µM.17 Ile-Gln-Try and Ile-Arg-Try from enzymatic digestion of egg ovotransferrin, had the
254
IC50 values as 0.59 and 2.8 µM, respectively.31 Therefore, 10 pieces of peptides with C-terminal Trp
255
and higher LibDock scores (ranging from 154 to 179) were picked out for further study (Table 3).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 10
Page 10 of 39
Page 11 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
256
The ACE inhibitory IC50 values of these tripeptides ranged from 0.61 to 590 µM. The two pieces of
257
peptides, Thr-Thr-Trp (TTW) and Val-His-Trp (VHW), respectively presented IC50 values as 0.61 ±
258
0.12 and 0.91 ± 0.31 µM, which indicated they are strong inhibitors to ACE inhibition.
259
The Inhibitory Pattern of the Peptides on ACE. ACE inhibitory peptides were reported to play
260
in all types, such as competitive, non-competitive, and mixed-competitive inhibition of ACE.32 TTW
261
and VHW were all confirmed as non-competitive inhibitors for ACE by Lineweaver-Burk plots
262
(Figure 2). There are also some reported peptides from amounts of food stuffs working in
263
non-competitive inhibition, for example Ile-Phe-Leu from fermented soybean food,33 and
264
Tyr-Phe-Pro from yellowfin sole.34
265
Table 4 shows the kinetic parameters of the two peptides binding to ACE. Combining with the
266
results shown in Figure 2, Km value is constant whatever inhibitors and their concentrations, which is
267
one of important properties of non-competitive inhibition. The chance is equal for inhibitor (peptide)
268
or substrate (HHL) to bind with ACE in non-competitive pattern. Therefore, the apparent affinity of
269
substrate binding to ACE is constant. However, the reactions against variety of competitive inhibitors
270
displayed diverse Km values,23 because the apparent affinity of substrate to its binding site in ACE
271
was decreased when the inhibitor present.
272
The Vmax of uninhibited ACE was 6.81 mg/mL⋅min, however, this velocity decreased
273
dose-dependently with the peptides. The peptide binds with ACE at another site than substrate to
274
form ACE-HHL-peptide and ACE-peptide complexes. The formation of these complexes depress the
275
apparent catalytic efficiency of ACE and reduce the enzymatic reaction rate. The Ki values of TTW
276
and VHW are 0.36 and 0.45 mM, which directly correlate with their activity of ACE inhibition,
277
indicating their high binding affinity to ACE.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 11
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
278
Stability of the ACE Inhibitory Peptides. TTW and VHW are tri-peptides that can cross the
279
intestinal wall and sequentially enter the blood circulation. However, the peptides should resist
280
gastrointestinal digestion and keep their integrity before above step, otherwise their biological
281
activity may be activated or inactivated.35 The fate of peptides under oral administration could be
282
imitated by the simulated gastrointestinal digestion in vitro.25 As Figure 3 shows, in vitro incubation
283
with gastric juice and intestinal liquid containing the corresponding digestion protease doesn’t cause
284
any obvious change on the ACE inhibitory activity of peptides, despite the peptides concentration.
285
This result suggests that the peptides are gastrointestinal stable and can maintain their significant
286
activity when they get into the blood.
330
ACE is a carboxypeptidase with very broad substrate specificity.36 Hence, some ACE inhibitory
331
peptides may be the substrate of ACE and hydrolyzed to smaller fragments. As a result, the ACE
332
inhibitory activity changes during the reaction. For instance, heptapeptide
333
Phe-Lys-Gly-Arg-Tyr-Tyr-Pro from chicken muscle could be hydrolyzed by ACE to produce three
334
shorter peptides Phe-Lys-Gly, Arg-Tyr and Tyr-Pro, meanwhile IC50 value increased from 0.55 µM to
335
34 µM.36 ACE Prodrug-type or substrate type inhibitors, such as
336
Ile-Val-Gly-Ala-Pro-Ala-His-Gln-Gly from both chicken muscle and dried bonito, could be
337
hydrolyzed into His-Gln-Gly and Ile-Val-Gly-Ala-Pro-Ala by ACE. Then His-Gln-Gly obtained
338
significant ACE inhibitory activity and antihypertensive activity.36 Accordingly, the peptides stability
339
upon ACE need to be taken into account. Figure 4 shows IC50 values of TTW and VHW are stable
340
within the incubation of peptides with ACE for 24 h. The result proves that TTW and VHW are
341
stable ACE inhibitors but not substrate.
342
Antihypertensive Activity on SHRs. With an ACE inhibitor type drug, Lisinopril, as positive
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 12
Page 12 of 39
Page 13 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
343
control, the antihypertensive activity in vivo of the two peptides was assessed on SHRs (Figure 5).
344
Lisinopril resulted in maximal antihypertensive effect on SHRs. Both TTW and VHW could
345
decrease the SBP of SHRs. Furthermore, VHW could significantly decrease the SBP at 1 and 2 h (p
0.05) as well. Both TTW and VHW could also play influences on
351
DBP. Although VHW affected SBP more significant, TTW led to a significant reduction of the DBP
352
from 180 to 140 mmHg at 2 h (p < 0.05), while VHW decreased the DBP from 174 to 153 mmHg at
353
1 h (p > 0.05) at most. The results implied that VHW and TTW could be used to treat different
354
hypertensive phenotypes or cooperate together because of their significant influence respectively on
355
SBP or DBP.
356
When a non-competitive ACE inhibitory peptide from the muscle of cuttlefish,
357
Val-Glu-Leu-Tyr-Pro, with IC50 value of 5.22 µM, was gavage administrated to SHRs in 10 mg/kg
358
bodyweight, maximum decline of SBP as 20 mmHg was realized at 6 h.37 Val-Trp from sardine
359
muscle, displaying competitive inhibitory pattern, has a maximum SBP decrease (18 mmHg) at 1 h
360
after the orally administration to SHRs in the dosage of 100 mg/kg body weight.38 Non-competitive
361
inhibitor of ACE from hydrolysate of oyster proteins, Val-Val-Tyr-Pro-Trp-Thr-Gln-Arg-Phe, with
362
IC50 value of 66 µM, showed the maximal drop of SBP as 10 mmHg at 6 h when the peptide was
363
gavaged to SHRs in dosage of 20 mg/kg body weight.39 Compared with these reported ACE
364
inhibitory peptides, TTW and VHW achieved more blood pressure decrease in relatively low dosage,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 13
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
365
suggested that TTW and VHW had a considerable potential as functional food for blood pressure
366
control.
367
Molecular Docking. VHW and TTW were docked into the binding pockets of ACE through
368
LibDock to discover the ligand-receptor interaction mechanism. The pose with the lowest binding
369
energy was recognized as the most stable conformation for further structural analysis. The 3-D and
370
2-D structures of the peptide-ACE complexes are displayed in Figure 6.
371
There are three main active site pockets in molecule of ACE. S1 pocket has three residues, Ala354,
372
Glu384 and Tyr523. S2 pocket comprises Gln281, His353, Lys511, His513 and Tyr520. S1’ pocket
373
only includes residue Glu162.40, 41 Both TTW and VHW locate in deep active channel of ACE, and
374
they are surrounded by the electron cloud of hydrophobic interactions which form a hydrophobic
375
pocket (Figure 6a and c). The peptides and the residues of ACE are linked through the main
376
interaction forces involving van der Waals force and some secondary interactions such as hydrogen
377
bonds, hydrophobic, and electrostatic forces (Figure 6b and d). The hydrogen bond is the main
378
interaction force to form a stable peptide-ACE complex. There are six hydrogen bonds formed
379
between VHW and the residues His353, Ala354, Glu384, Glu411 and Tyr520 of ACE (Figure 6b,
380
Table 4). Namely, VHW constructs three hydrogen bonds with S1 pocket (Ala354 and Glu384) and
381
two more with S2 pocket (His 353 and Tyr 520). Among the residues connecting with VHW, Glu384
382
is the one formed coordination effect with Zn2+.19 Thereafter, VHW may also interfere ACE from
383
combining with Zn2+ that may contribute to the ACE inhibitory activity.
384
TTW also forms 6 hydrogen bonds with ACE. The involved residues are His353, Ala354, His513
385
and Pro407 (Figure 6d, Table 4). Ala354 belonging to S1 pocket links with TTW through 3 hydrogen
386
bonds. His353 and His513 are part of S2 pocket, generating 2 hydrogen bonds with TTW. His353,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 14
Page 14 of 39
Page 15 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
387
Ala354 and His513 were reported as important residues interacting with Lisinopril which formed 6
388
hydrogen bonds with ACE when H2O molecule absent.19, 40, 42 According to the docking results,
389
VHW and TTW achieve strong ACE inhibitory activity mainly through the hydrogen bonds with the
390
active site pockets of ACE.
391
ITC Assays. ITC has been reported as an important method to explain the binding mechanism of
392
Lisinopril, Enalaprilat and Captopril.43 A typical ITC profile of the peptides reacting with
393
recombinant human tACE is shown in Figure 7. According to the forward titration curve (Figure 7a),
394
the binding rate of Lisinopril is quick so that the reaction equilibrium is achieved at about 14 min.
395
The fitting curve of molar reaction heat against molar ratio (inhibitor concentration over ACE
396
concentration) is like a typical “S” curve, and reaction reaches saturation when the molar ratio is
397
approximately 1.3. Both of the titration curve and the fitting curve of VHW are looked similar as
398
those of Lisinopril (Figure 7b). However, the reaction equilibrium of TTW binding to ACE is
399
achieved at approximate 16 min and the fitting curve is far from a typical “S” curve (Fig. 7c).
400
Table 6 shows the thermodynamic parameters of the reactions resulted by ITC. The ∆G values of
401
Lisinopril and VHW binding to ACE are approximately same, but that of TTW binding to ACE is
402
lower. Moreover, according to The Second Law of Thermodynamics, the ∆G of the three reactions are
403
mainly contributed by -T∆S, which indicated the three reactions are all entropically-driven. The
404
value of -T∆S indicates the degree of conformational changes of ACE before and after the reaction,
405
which results in sufficient interactions between ACE and peptides. The comparison of the -T∆S
406
values of VHW and TTW suggests that VHW achieves more stable interaction with ACE. The
407
dissociation constant Kd of the ACE-peptide complex can reflect the binding affinity as well. The Kd
408
value of VHW is close to that of Lisinopril, but that of TTW is much higher. This result indicates that
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 15
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
409
VHW and Lisinopril can form more stable complex with ACE than that TTW can. Although TTW
410
and VHW displayed approximate in vitro ACE inhibitory activity, VHW was thermodynamically
411
verified to form more stable complex with ACE by ITC, which might partly interpret the difference
412
of antihypertensive activity between TTW and VHW. Therefore, ITC is an efficient method for the
413
binding mechanism illustration of ACE inhibitory peptide through the thermodynamic analysis.
414
In a summary, two novel ACE inhibitory peptides, TTW and VHW, screened from the peptide
415
library generated form C. vulgaris protein through gastrointestinal digestion in silico, were firstly
416
reported. Both the peptides were stable against in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion, as well
417
as the incubation with ACE. The animal procedures showed both the peptides could significant cut
418
down the blood pressure of the SHRs in relatively low dosage. Together with the results of molecular
419
docking and ITC assay, the two peptides were verified as excellent ACE inhibitors and could be used
420
in the treatment of different hypertensive phenotypes. Compared with the reported ACE inhibitory
421
peptides from C. vulgaris, the two peptides display the highest in vitro inhibitory activity and in vivo
422
anti-hypertensive activity. The Trp content of C. vulgaris protein is about 2.2%, suggesting that the
423
generation of peptides with Trp as C-terminus by enzymatic hydrolysis are with palpable possibility,
424
and C. vulgaris may be a good resource for ACE inhibitory peptides. Therefore, the coming work
425
will focus on the enrichment of ACE inhibitory peptides with C-terminal Trp by enzymatic
426
hydrolysis of C. vulgaris protein. Besides, the effects of C-terminal Trp on the ACE inhibition will
427
be discovered by the crystal structural study of VHW-ACE complex. The inhibitory mechanism
428
insights by the combination of molecular docking and ITC assay in present work indicates a novel
429
way for the in vitro inhibitory mechanism study according to both binding model and actual
430
thermodynamic features.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 16
Page 16 of 39
Page 17 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
431 432 433
FUNDINF SOURCES This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31301413,
434
31772007), Open Funding Project of Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of
435
Education) of China and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of
436
China (No. 2013AA102109).
437
Notes
438
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 17
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
439
REFERENCES
440
(1) Chacónlee, T. L.; Gonzálezmariño, G. E. Microalgae for “healthy” foods-possibilities and
441
challenges. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. F. 2010, 9, 655-675.
442
(2) Morita, K.; Matsueda, T.; Iida, T.; Hasegawa, T. Chlorella accelerates dioxin excretion in rats. J.
443
Nutr. 1999, 129, 1731-1736.
444
(3) Czerpak, R.; Piotrowska, A.; Wierzbowska, M. Biochemical activity of biochanin A in the green
445
alga Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck (Chlorophyceae). Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2003, 12, 163-169.
446
(4) Mahboob, S.; Rauf, A.; Ashraf, M.; Sultana, T.; Sultana, S.; Jabeen, F.; Rajoka, M.; Al-Balawi, H.;
447
Al-Ghanim, K. High-density growth and crude protein productivity of a thermotolerant Chlorella
448
vulgaris: production kinetics and thermodynamics. Aquacult. Int. 2012, 20, 455-466.
449
(5) Tokuşolu, Ö.; Ünal, M. K. Biomass nutrient profiles of three microalgae: Spirulina platensis,
450
Chlorella vulgaris, and Isochrisis galbana. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 1144-1148.
451
(6) Samarakoon, K.; Jeon, Y. J. Bio-functionalities of proteins derived from marine algae-A review.
452
Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 948-960.
453
(7) Suetsuna, K.; Chen, J. R. Identification of antihypertensive peptides from peptic digest of two
454
microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris and Spirulina platensis. Mar. Biotechnol. 2001, 3, 305-309.
455
(8) Ichuan, S.; Fang, T.; Wu, T. K. Isolation and characterisation of a novel angiotensin I-converting
456
enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from the algae protein waste. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 279-284.
457
(9) Hartl, F. U.; Martin, J. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996, 381,
458
571-580.
459
(10) Iroyukifujita, H.; Eiichiyokoyama, K.; Yoshikawa, M. Classification and antihypertensive
460
activity of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides derived from food proteins. J. Food
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 18
Page 18 of 39
Page 19 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
461
Sci. 2000, 65, 564-569.
462
(11) Alemán, A.; Giménez, B.; Pérez-Santin, E.; Gómez-Guillén, M. C.; Montero, P. Contribution of
463
Leu and Hyp residues to antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory activities of peptide sequences isolated
464
from squid gelatin hydrolysate. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 334-341.
465
(12) Möller, N. P.; Scholz-Ahrens, K. E.; Roos, N.; Schrezenmeir, J. Bioactive peptides and proteins
466
from foods: indication for health effects. Eur. J. Nutr. 2008, 47, 171-182.
467
(13) Mora, L; Hayes, M. Cardioprotective cryptides derived from fish and other food sources:
468
Generation, application, and future markets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1319-1331.
469
(14) Gu, Y.; Majumder, K.; Wu, J. QSAR-aided in silico approach in evaluation of food proteins as
470
precursors of ACE inhibitory peptides. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 2465-2474.
471
(15) Tao, M.; Sun, H.; Liu, L.; Luo, X.; Lin, G.; Li, R. Zhao, Z.; Zhao, Z. Graphitized porous carbon
472
for rapid screening of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory peptide GAMVVH from silkworm
473
pupa protein and molecular insight into inhibition mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65,
474
8626-8633.
475
(16) Darewicz, M.; Iwaniak, A.; Minkiewicz, P. Biologically active peptides derived from milk
476
proteins. Med. Weter. 2014, 70, 348-352.
477
(17) Khan, M. T. H.; Dedachi, K.; Matsui, T.; Kurita, N.; Borgatti, M.; Gambari, R.; Sylte, I.
478
Dipeptide inhibitors of thermolysin and angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
479
2012, 12, 1748-1762
480
(18) Guo, M.; Chen, X.; Wu, J.; Zhang, L.; Huang, W.; Yuan, Y.; Fang, M.; Xie, J.; Wei, D.
481
Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from Sipuncula (Phascolosoma esculenta).
482
Proc. Biochem. 2017, 63, 84-95.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 19
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
483
(19) Natesh, R.; Schwager, S. L.; Sturrock, E. D.; Acharya, K. R. Crystal structure of the human
484
angiotensin-converting enzyme-lisinopril complex. Nature 2003, 421, 551-554.
485
(20) Ababou, A.; Ladbury, J. E. Survey of the year 2005: literature on applications of isothermal
486
titration calorimetry. J. Mol. Recognit. 2007, 20, 4-14.
487
(21) Ni, H.; Li, L.; Liu, G.; Hu, S-Q. Inhibition mechanism and model of an angiotensin I-converting
488
enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory hexapeptide from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). PLoS One 2012, 7,
489
e37077.
490
(22) Wu, H.; Liu, Y.; Guo, M.; Xie, J.; Jiang, X. A virtual screening method for inhibitory peptides of
491
angiotensin I-converting enzyme. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, 1635-1642.
492
(23) Li, H.; Aluko, R. E. Kinetics of the inhibition of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase ii
493
by pea protein-derived peptides. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2005, 6, 656-662.
494
(24) Marambe, H. K.; Shand, P. J.; Wanasundara, J. P. Release of angiotensin I-converting enzyme
495
inhibitory peptides from flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) protein under simulated gastrointestinal
496
digestion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9596-9604.
497
(25) Wu, J.; Ding, X. Characterization of inhibition and stability of soy-protein-derived angiotensin
498
I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides. Food Res. Int. 2002, 35, 367-375.
499
(26) Salampessy, J.; Reddy, N.; Phillips, M.; Kailasapathy, K. Isolation and characterization of
500
nutraceutically potential ACE-Inhibitory peptides from leatherjacket (Meuchenia sp.) protein
501
hydrolysates. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 80, 430-436.
502
(27) Fujita, H.; Yoshikawa, M. LKPNM: A prodrug-type ACE-inhibitory peptide derived from fish
503
protein. Immunopharmacol. 1999, 44, 123-127.
504
(28) Pripp, A. H. Initial proteolysis of milk proteins and its effect on formation of ACE-inhibitory
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 20
Page 20 of 39
Page 21 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
505
peptides during gastrointestinal proteolysis: a bioinformatic, in silico approach. Eur. Food Res.
506
Technol. 2005, 221, 712-716.
507
(29) FitzGerald, R. J; Murray, B. A.; Walsh, D. J. Hypotensive peptides from milk proteins. J. Nutr.
508
2004, 134, 980-988.
509
(30) Vermeirssen, V.; Van, B. A.; Van, C. J.; Van, A. A.; Verstraete, W. A quantitative in silico
510
analysis calculates angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity in pea and whey
511
protein digests. Biochimie 2004, 86, 231-239.
512
(31) Majumder, K.; Wu, J. A new approach for identification of novel antihypertensive peptides from
513
egg proteins by QSAR and bioinformatics. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1371-1378.
514
(32) Maeno, M.; Yamamoto, N.; Takano, T. Identification of an antihypertensive peptide from casein
515
hydrolysate produced by a proteinase from lactobacillus helveticus, cp790. J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79,
516
1316-1321.
517
(33) Kuba, M.; Tanaka, K.; Tawata, S.; Takeda, Y.; Yasuda, M. Angiotensin I converting enzyme
518
inhibitory peptides isolated from fermented soybean food. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67,
519
1278-1283.
520
(34) Jung, W. K.; Mendis, E., Je; J. Y., Park; P. J., Son; B. W.; Kim, H. C. Angiotensin i-converting
521
enzyme inhibitory peptide from yellowfin sole (limanda aspera) frame protein and its
522
antihypertensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 26-32.
523
(35) Escudero, E.; Mora, L.; Toldrá, F. Stability of ACE inhibitory ham peptides against heat
524
treatment and in vitro digestion. Food Chem. 2014, 161, 305-311.
525
(36) Fujita, H.; Yokoyama, K.; Yoshikawa, M. Classification and antihypertensive activity of
526
angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides derived from food proteins. J. Food Sci. 2000,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 21
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
527
65, 564-569.
528
(37) Cao, W.; Zhang, C.; Hong, P.; Ji, H.; Hao, J. Purification and identification of an ace inhibitory
529
peptide from the peptic hydrolysate of acetes chinensis and its antihypertensive effects in
530
spontaneously hypertensive rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 959-965.
531
(38) Matsui, T.; Hayashi, A.; Tamaya, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Murakami, K. Depressor
532
effect induced by dipeptide, val-tyr, in hypertensive transgenic mice is due, in part, to the
533
suppression of human circulating renin-angiotensin system. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. P. 2003, 30,
534
262-275.
535
(39) Wang, J.; Hu, J.; Cui, J.; Bai, X.; Du, Y.; Miyaguchi, Y. Purification and identification of a ACE
536
inhibitory peptide from oyster proteins hydrolysate and the antihypertensive effect of hydrolysate in
537
spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 302-308.
538
(40) Wu, Q.; Jia, J.; Yan, H.; Du, J.; Gui, Z. A novel angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE)
539
inhibitory peptide from gastrointestinal protease hydrolysate of silkworm pupa (Bombyx mori)
540
protein: Biochemical characterization and molecular docking study. Peptides 2014, 68, 17-24.
541
(41) Rohit, A. C.; Sathisha, K.; Aparna, H. S. A variant peptide of buffalo colostrum
542
beta-lactoglobulin inhibits angiotensin I-converting enzyme activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 53,
543
211-219.
544
(42) Jimsheena, V. K.; Gowda, L. R. Arachin derived peptides as selective angiotensin I-converting
545
enzyme (ACE) inhibitors: structure-activity relationship. Peptides 2010, 31, 1165-1176.
546
(43) Andújar-Sánchez, M.; Cámara-Artigas, A.; Jara-Pérez, V. A calorimetric study of the binding of
547
lisinopril, enalaprilat and captopril to angiotensin-converting enzyme. Biophys. Chem. 2004, 111,
548
183-189.
549 ACS Paragon Plus Environment 22
Page 22 of 39
Page 23 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
550
Figure 1. Length distribution of peptides after in silico gastrointestinal digestion of proteins of C.
551
vulgaris with BIOPEP.
552
Figure 2. Lineweaver–Burk plots of ACE inhibited by the peptides. 1/V and 1/S represents the
553
reciprocal of reaction velocity and substrate concentration, respectively. (a) TTW; (b) VHW.
554
Figure 3. The stability of VHW and TTW under simulated gastrointestinal digestion. The final
555
concentration of peptides were 0.1 and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively for (a) and (b). GC, peptide sample
556
and simulated gastric fluid without pepsin; G, peptide sample with gastric fluid with pepsin; G + IC,
557
peptide sample and simulated gastrointestinal fluid without pepsin and pancreatin; G + I, peptide
558
sample with gastrointestinal fluid with pepsin and pancreatin. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3).
559
Figure 4. The stability of VHW and TTW against ACE. The concentration of peptides were 0.1
560
mg/mL, values represent mean ± SD (n = 3).
561
Figure 5. Changes of SBP and DBP after oral administration of Lisinopril, VHW and TTW. Normal
562
saline was used as control. Single oral administration was performed in dose of 5 mg/kg body weight.
563
Blood pressures were measured before and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after oral administration of Lisinopril or
564
the peptides. The differences with a value of p < 0.05 were considered to be significant. (a) SBP
565
changes; (b) DBP changes.
566
Figure 6. Molecular docking of ACE and the peptides. (a) 3-D details of ACE and VHW (green)
567
interaction; (b) 2-D interaction details of VHW and ACE; (c) 3-D details of ACE and TTW (green)
568
interaction; (d) 2-D interaction details of TTW and ACE. Green dotted lines represent hydrogen bond
569
that supply electrons by the main chain, and blue dotted lines represent hydrogen bond that supply
570
electrons by the side chain. Atoms in green mean van der Waals interaction force, and pink atoms
571
mean electrostatic interaction force and gray atom means zinc. Difference density map (blue clouds)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 23
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
572
is the electron cloud of hydrophobic interactions (For interpretation of the references to color in this
573
figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
574
Figure 7. ITC profile of Lisinopril, VHW and TTW binding to ACE. (a) Lisinopril; (b) VHW; (c)
575
TTW.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 24
Page 24 of 39
Page 25 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 1. Proteins of C. vulgaris in UniProt. Length of amino
MW
Length of amino
MW
acid sequence
(kDa)
acid sequence
(kDa)
A9XHY8 (Antifreeze protein)
104
10.8
P56325 (Photosystem II reaction center protein M)
36
4.01
C6ZE77 (Actin)
157
17.6
P56327 (Photosystem II reaction center protein T)
31
3.60
G4WUD7 (Antifreeze protein)
178
18.7
P56338 (Photosystem II reaction center protein J)
42
4.25
G4WUD8 (Antifreeze protein)
178
18.7
P56339 (Photosystem II reaction center protein L)
38
4.39
G4WUE0 (Antifreeze protein)
178
18.7
41
4.43
M4HPI0 (Heat shock protein 90)
703
80.7
751
83.2
138
16.5
P56340 (Photosystem I reaction center subunit IX) P56341 (Photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1) P56342 (Photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A2)
734
81.8
133
14.6
P56348 (Photosystem II reaction center protein K)
42
4.68
81
8.82
P56349 (Chloroplast envelope membrane protein)
266
31.1
P56305 (Cytochrome b6-f complex subunit 5)
37
4.01
819
94.7
P56306 (Cytochrome b6-f complex subunit 6)
31
3.44
36
3.95
P56307 (Photosystem II CP47 reaction center protein)
508
56.1
P56370 (Uncharacterized membrane protein ycf78) P58214 (Photosystem I reaction center subunit VIII) Q7M1S5 (Cytochrome c6)
88
9.29
P56308 (Photosystem II CP43 reaction center protein)
473
52.1
Q8H0E4 (Actin)
238
26.5
P56313 (Photosystem II reaction center protein Z)
62
6.76
Q8H0E5 (Actin)
238
26.5
P56314 (Photosystem I reaction center subunit XII)
31
3.31
Q96405 (Actin)
280
31.5
P56316 (Cytochrome f)
315
34.2
Q96406 (Actin)
205
23.2
P56318 (Photosystem II protein D1)
353
39.0
Q9LRG1 (Urf59 protein)
69
7.89
P56319 (Photosystem II D2 protein)
352
39.4
Q9LRG2 (Urf53 protein)
177
19.4
P56321 (Cytochrome b6)
215
24.1
Q9LRG3 (Urf42 protein)
126
13.7
P56322 (Cytochrome b6-f complex subunit 4)
160
17.4
Q9LRG7 (Alpha-tubulin)
149
16.6
P56323 (Photosystem II reaction center protein H)
80
8.54
Q9SAR8 (Actin)
212
24.0
P56324 (Photosystem II reaction center protein I)
38
4.38
Name
O20118 (Uncharacterized 16.5 kDa protein in psaC-atpA intergenic region) O20120 (Uncharacterized 14.6 kDa protein in psaC-atpA intergenic region) P56301 (Photosystem I iron-sulfur center)
25
Name
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 26 of 39
Table 2. Parameters for molecular docking experiments performed with the LibDock of DS 3.5. Input site sphere
Parameter value
Input site sphere
Parameter value
x
48.65
Keep hydrogrns
FALSE
y
82.55
Max conformation hits
30
z
54.04
Max start conformations
1000
Number of hotpot
100
Steric fraction
0.1
Docking tolerance
0.25
Final cluster radius
0.5
Docking preference
User Specified
Apolar SASA cutoff
15
Max hits to save
10
Polar SASA cutoff
5
Max number of hits
100
Surface grid steps
18
Minimum LibDock score
100
Conformation method
Best
Final score cutoff
0.5
Minimization algorithm
Do not minimize
Max BFGS steps
50
Parallel processing
FALSE
Rigid optimization
FALSE
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 26
Page 27 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 3. Summary of the LibDock score and ACE inhibitory IC50 of the selected peptides. IC50 values are mean ± confidence interval. Means for a variable not sharing a common symbol (a, d, c, d, e, f, g, h) are significantly different (p < 0.05). Peptide
MW
LibDock score
IC50 (µM)
Precursor protein b
Val-Asp-Trp
418
179
21.5 ± 6.9
Val-His-Trp
441
177
0.91 ± 0.31a
His-Asn-Trp
455
168
126 ± 20d e
Alpha-tubulin (Q9LRG7) Photosystem II D2 protein (P56319)
Asp-Thr-Trp
420
165
260 ± 26
Photosystem II CP43 reaction center protein (P56308)
Thr-Thr-Trp
406
162
0.61 ± 0.12a
Photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1 (P56341)
Thr-Asn-Trp
419
161
517 ± 52g
Photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1(P56341); Actin (Q96405; Q9SAR8)
Val-Val-Trp Pro-Ile-Trp Val-Pro-Trp Thr-Asn-Trp
402 414 400 420
160 158
c
76.7 ± 10.1
Photosystem II protein D1 (P56318); Heat shock protein 90 (M4HPI0)
f
Uncharacterized membrane protein ycf78 (P56370)
590 ± 20
154
383 ± 18
154
c
61 ± 8.9
Photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1 (P56341)
g
Actin (Q96405; Q9SAR8)
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 39
Table 4. Kinetics parameters of ACE-catalyzed reactions in different peptide concentrations. kinetics parameters
Control
Km (mM) Vmax (mg/mL⋅min) Ki (mM)
TTW 1 mg/mL
VHW 0.5 mg/mL
4.00 ± 0.12 6.81 ± 1.02
1.56 ± 0.14
1.89 ± 0.21
0.36 ± 0.08
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 28
1 mg/mL
0.5 mg/mL 4.00 ± 0.12
1.88 ± 0.13
2.24 ± 0.19
0.45 ± 0.11
Page 29 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 5. The information of hydrogen bonds of TTW and VHW binding with ACE. Peptide
TTW
VHW
Distance
Hydrogen bond
(Å)
ACE active pockets
H30-His353
2.17
S2
H31-Ala354
2.08
S1
H35-His513
2.48
S2
H39-Ala354
2.02
S1
H42-Ala354
2.46
S1
H53-Pro407
1.89
-
H34-Glu411
2.08
-
H48-Ala354
2.41
S1
H51-Ala354
1.96
S1
H54-His353
2.45
S2
H58-Tyr520
2.23
S2
H63-Glu384
1.93
S1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 30 of 39
Table 6. Thermodynamic parameters for the inhibitors binding to ACE. ∆S
-T∆S
∆H
∆G
Kd
(Kcal/mol)
(Kcal/mol)
(Kcal/mol)
(Kcal/mol)
(nM)
VHW
24.2
-6.73
-4.30
-10.5
20.0
TTW
22.4
-6.23
-2.02
-8.75
377
Lisinopril
25.9
-7.21
-3.21
-10.4
20.0
Peptides
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 30
Page 31 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 1.
Amout of peptides
1200 None-repeated peptides
1000
Repeated peptides
800 600 400 200 0
Xie et al.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 31
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 39
Figure 2.
1000
1 mg/mL
800
1/V (mg-1⋅mL⋅min)
0.5 mg/mL Control
600 400 200 0
-3
-2
-1
0 -200
1 1/S (mM-1)
2
1 1/S (mM-1)
1.5
(a)
1000
1 mg/mL 1/V (mg-1 ⋅mL⋅ min)
0.5 mg/mL Control
800 600 400 200 0
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
-200 (b) Xie et al.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 32
Page 33 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3. 100
GC
ACE inhibitory activity (%)
G 80
G+IC G+I
60 40 20 0
TTW
VHW (a)
ACE inhibitory activity (%)
100
GC G
80
G+IC G+I
60 40 20 0 TTW
VHW (b)
Xie et al.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 34 of 39
Figure 4. ACE inhibitory activity (%)
100 VHW
TTW
90 80 70 60 50 0
4
8
12
16
Time (h)
Xie et al.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 34
20
24
Page 35 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Figure 5.
260 240 220 200 ∗
*
180
* **
160 0
2
4 Time (h)
Control
Lisinopril
6 VHW
8 TTW
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
(a)
190
170
150
*
* * * 130 0
2 Control
4 Time (h) Lisinopril
6 VHW
(b) Xie et al.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 35
8 TTW
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 36 of 39
Figure 6.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Xie et al.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 36
Page 37 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 7.
(a)
(b)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(c) Xie et al.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 38
Page 38 of 39
Page 39 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphic
ACS Paragon Plus Environment 39