Arsenic and Sulfamethoxazole Increase the ... - ACS Publications

Subscriber access provided by KEAN UNIV

Ecotoxicology and Human Environmental Health

Arsenic and Sulfamethoxazole Increase the Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the Gut of Earthworm Hong-Tao Wang, Yong-Guan Zhu, Qiaoqiao Chi, Dong Zhu, Gang Li, Jing Ding, Xin-Li An, Fei Zheng, and Xi-Mei Xue Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02277 • Publication Date (Web): 02 Aug 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on August 2, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 37

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Arsenic and Sulfamethoxazole Increase the Incidence of

2

Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the Gut of Earthworm

3 4

Hong-Tao Wang,†,‡ Qiao-Qiao Chi,† Dong Zhu,†,‡ Gang Li,† Jing Ding,§ Xin-Li An,†

5

Fei Zheng,†,‡ Yong-Guan Zhu,†,‡,§ and Xi-Mei Xue*,†

6 7

†

8

Academy of Sciences, 1799 Jimei Road, Xiamen 361021, China

9

‡ University

Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese

of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China

10

§

11

Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China

State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental

12 13 14 15

*Address Correspondence to Xi-Mei Xue,

16

Address: Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1799 Jimei

17

Road, Xiamen 361021, China

18

Phone number: +86(0)592 6190559

19

Fax number: +86(0)592 6190977

20

Email address: [email protected]

21 22 23 24

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


25

ABSTRACT

26

Combinations of metal(loid) contamination and antibiotics are considered to increase

27

the abundance of resistance genes in the environment, whereas the combined effect of

28

metal(loid)s and antibiotics on microbial communities and antibiotic resistance genes

29

(ARGs) in the gut of soil fauna remains unknown. We investigated herein the

30

alteration of ARGs and the gut microbial communities after the earthworm Metaphire

31

sieboldi was exposed to arsenate and/or sulfamethoxazole using high-throughput

32

quantitative PCR and Illumina sequencing analysis. Arsenic accumulation in the body

33

tissues of arsenic-exposed earthworms exerted a significant inhibition on growth and

34

survival. The synergistic interactions of arsenic and sulfamethoxazole increased

35

significantly the incidence of ARGs and mobile genetic elements in the earthworm

36

gut microbiota. In addition, co-exposure to arsenic and sulfamethoxazole altered the

37

structure of the gut microbial communities, and the changes correlated with ARG

38

profiles of the gut microbiota. Our results indicate that the gut of soil fauna is a

39

neglected hotspot of antibiotic resistance.

40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47


Page 2 of 37

Page 3 of 37


48

TOC ART

49 50

The TOC was drawn by Dr. Hong-Tao Wang

51 52 53 54



55

INTRODUCTION

56

Metal(loid)s generally coexist with antibiotics in animal manures and agricultural soil

57

amended with swine manure.1 Antibiotics, widely applied as human and veterinary

58

medicines to treat bacterial infections or to promote the growth of animals, may enter

59

the terrestrial environment when soil is fertilized with manure or sludge.2 Higher

60

concentrations of antibiotics were shown in organic vegetable fields than in traditional

61

fields due to the repeated manure application.3 Antibiotics in agricultural soil exhibit

62

various adsorption affinities on soil, and degradation rate of antibiotics can be

63

affected by their initial concentrations, soil microbial activities and oxygen status.4

64

Sulfamethoxazole belongs to sulphonamides, a broad-spectrum antibiotic against

65

most of gram-positive and many gram-negative bacteria by inhibiting their

66

multiplication, and is widely utilized to protect the health of animals or human.5

67

Sulfamethoxazole is a relatively recalcitrant antibiotic1 and can exert selective

68

pressure on soil microbial communities.3 Moreover, metalloid arsenic may be

69

introduced into managed agricultural soils due to the application of inorganic and

70

organic fertilisers, pesticides, sewage sludge, composts and livestock wastes where

71

arsenic compounds were utilized as food additives.6 Metal(loid)s can persist in soil for

72

long periods because these elements are non-degradable and difficult to be removed.7

73

Combined pollution of antibiotics and toxic metal(loid)s posed a major threat to soil

74

ecosystem and human health by altering the diversity and composition of soil

75

microbial communities7, 8 or exerting a co-selection pressure on antibiotic resistance

76

of microorganisms.1, 9


Page 4 of 37

Page 5 of 37


77

Microbial antibiotic resistance is encoded by antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs),

78

which are regarded as emerging environmental contaminants.10 Unlike traditional

79

chemical contaminants of environment, ARGs can be spread vertically (bacterial

80

proliferation) and horizontally (exchange of genetic information between bacteria),

81

and can be transported globally.10-12 Multidrug-resistant pathogens acquiring

82

resistance from the environmental microbiome will be “superbugs”, one of the

83

greatest threats to human health.13 Antibiotic residues in the environment are

84

considered to be a selective pressure of ARGs emergence and transmission.14

85

Numerous antibiotics residues could induce selection of bacteria and promote the

86

horizontal gene transfer, increasing ARGs abundance.2,

87

ARGs abundance is sometimes independent of antibiotics and is affected by toxic

88

metals such as copper, nickel and zinc.16, 17 Arsenic contamination affects the growth

89

and development of organisms and poses a potential threat to human health via food

90

chain.18, 19 In addition, arsenic in soils is ingested and accumulated by non-target soil

91

organisms via ingestion and dermal contact, subsequently affecting the survival and

92

the microbial community structure of soil animals.20,

93

frequently detected together in agricultural fields after long-term application of

94

livestock manure due to the dietary additions of metalloids and antibiotic growth

95

promoters in the livestock industry.1 Metal(loid) contamination was considered to

96

increase the proliferation of ARGs via several co-selection mechanisms including

97

co-resistance (metal(loid) resistance genes and ARGs present on the same genetic

98

element, such as in plasmids, integrons or transposons), cross-resistance (the same

21


15

Moreover, alteration of

Arsenic and antibiotics are


99

genetic element accounts for resistance to both of metal(loid)s and antibiotics), or

100

co-regulation (transcriptional or translational responses to metal(loid)s or antibiotics

101

form an interconnected response to either stress).9 Arsenic in swine manure has been

102

shown to increase the abundance of ARGs and mobile genetic elements (MGEs),

103

suggesting that co-selection of arsenic and antibiotic occurred in the environment.1

104

However, the combined effects of soil contamination with arsenicals and antibiotics

105

on ARGs in the gut microbiota of non-target soil fauna remains to be investigated.

106

Soil fauna, an important reservoir of biodiversity and soil quality bio-indicators,

107

is involved in the decomposition of organic matter and nutrient cycling in the soil

108

ecosystem service via their gut microbiota.22-24 The earthworm Metaphire sieboldi, a

109

worldwide distribution and highly productive species dwelling in the soil surface,

110

lives mainly on plant litter and can be applied in microcosm experiments of soil

111

fauna.25,

112

(As(V)) and sulfamethoxazole. The main aims of the study were 1) to detect the

113

impact of arsenic or/and antibiotic on the gut microbial communities by sequencing

114

bacterial 16S rRNA gene, 2) to characterize the diversity and abundance of ARGs in

115

the earthworm gut exposed to As(V) or/and sulfamethoxazole with high throughput

116

quantitative polymerase chain reaction (HT-qPCR), 3) to study the co-occurrence

117

patterns between the gut microbiota and ARGs.

118

MATERIALS AND METHODS

119

Organisms and reagents.

120

used in this study were purchased from Aohai company in Nanjing, China.

26

In this study, M. sieboldi was treated with combinations of Arsenate

Sexually mature earthworms of the species M. sieboldi


Page 6 of 37

Page 7 of 37


121

Earthworms with the same age and approximately the same weight were cultured in

122

the collected field soil under the controlled conditions (20 oC, 12 h light/12 h dark

123

cycle and moderate relative air humidity (70%)) prior to test. Sodium arsenate

124

(Na3AsO₄·12H2O, CAS 15120-17-9, purity, >99%) was used in this study at 100 mg

125

kg−1 to monitor effect on microbiota and ARGs in the gut. Sulfamethoxazole (CAS

126

723-46-6, purity >99%) was applied at 10 mg kg-1.

127

Assay conditions. The earthworms were cultured in soil from an arsenic-free

128

vegetable field in Xiamen City, Southeast China, and oatmeal was used as the diet

129

(5-8 g oatmeal kg−1 dry weight soil) by thoroughly mixing the soil with the oatmeal

130

powder. Soil spiked with the contaminants (As(V) alone (at a final concentration of

131

100 mg kg-1 dry weight soil), sulfamethoxazole alone (at a final concentration of 10

132

mg kg−1 dry weight soil), combined contamination with As(V) (100 mg kg-1) and

133

sulfamethoxazole (10 mg kg-1), respectively) was obtained by combining soil with an

134

appropriate volume of As(V) or/and sulfamethoxazole in solution. The soil was added

135

by an equal volume of Milli-Q water (Millipore, 18.2 MΩ cm at 25 oC) as control.

136

Totally, there were four treatments including the control and three spiked soils (i.e.

137

As(V) alone, sulfamethoxazole alone, combined treatment), and each treatment has

138

three replicates. For each replicate, about 900 g of the soil was added to a

139

polyethylene plastic box (25×15×12 cm) which was covered with a vent lid to keep

140

ventilation. Ten adult earthworms similar in size were put in one box, and the

141

experiment was carried out at 70% relative humidity and with a 12:12 h light/dark

142

period in a 20 oC incubator which was supplemented regularly with Milli-Q water to



143

keep relative humidity constant during the assays. After 28 days, the earthworms were

144

counted and weighed.

145

Sample collection and DNA extraction. All earthworms collected were killed with

146

liquid nitrogen and immediately transferred into absolute ethyl alcohol for a few

147

seconds and washed five times with sterilized water to reduce interference of

148

microorganisms from the body wall. Earthworm guts were removed under sterile

149

conditions with aseptic forceps, and transferred into a 2-mL Eppendorf tube. Total

150

DNA from 0.5 g of soil or gut was extracted by using a FastDNA® Spin Kit for Soil

151

(MP Biomedicals, CA) according to the manufacturer's directions. Agarose gel

152

electrophoresis (1.0%) and spectrophotometric analysis (Nanodrop ND-1000, Thermo

153

Fisher) were used to detect the quality and concentration of DNA. Soil and gut DNA

154

were stored at -20 oC until use.

155

16S rRNA gene amplification, sequencing and data analysis. The V4−V5 region of

156

the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the forward primer 515F:

157

GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG and reverse primer 907R with the unique barcode

158

CCGTCAATCMTTTRAGTTT. The PCR and gel purification of PCR fragments

159

were carried out as described previously.27 The thermal cycle of PCR consisted of an

160

initial enzyme activation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of amplification: 95 °C for 30

161

s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The amplicons reclaimed from agar gel were

162

sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform (Novogene, Tianjin, China).

163

Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME, version 1.8.0)28 was used to

164

analyze the high-throughput sequencing data. The operational taxonomic units


Page 8 of 37

Page 9 of 37


165

(OTUs) was defined at the ≥ 97% sequence similarity using UCLUST29 and OTUs

166

with only one representative sequence were removed prior to downstream analysis.

167

The taxonomic classification of OTUs was assigned against the reference sequences

168

in the Greengenes 13.8 16S rRNA gene database,30 and sequences was aligned via a

169

PyNAST aligner.31 The bacterial alpha-diversity was estimated with the metrics

170

observed species (OTUs) and alpha diversity indicators, such as Chao1, PD Whole

171

tree, and rarefaction curves. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on

172

Bray−Curtis distance and Adonis test was performed to compare microbial

173

communities from different samples.

174

HT-qPCR of ARGs. HT-qPCR was run on the Wafergen SmartChip Real-time PCR

175

System (Warfergen Inc., Fremont, CA) to estimate the diversity and abundance of

176

ARGs in the soil and earthworm gut. A total of 296 primer sets targeting 285 ARGs,

177

10 MGEs including 8 transposase genes and one clinical class 1 integron, one class 1

178

integron and one 16S rRNA gene (Table S1) in one ARGs run were used in this study.

179

For each run, a non-template control including three replicates in each primer pair was

180

amplified. The reaction system composed of nuclease-free PCR grade water, 1 ×

181

LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master mix, bovine serum albumin, primers, and

182

DNA template. The HT-qPCR program for ARGs analysis was carried out as

183

described previously.24 This program consisted of an initial 10 min denaturation step

184

at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C and integrated

185

annealing for 30 s at 60 °C. The melting processes and qPCR results were all

186

generated by the corresponding software. Wells with amplification efficiencies



187

(90%−110%) were accepted, and corresponding ARGs would to be discarded if only

188

one of three technical replicates were not amplified. In addition, the fold-change value

189

of ARGs (FC value) was used to indicate the enrichment of ARGs in the treated gut

190

compared to the control according to a previous study.27 A threshold cycle (CT) value

191

(31) was set as the detection limit, and relative copy number of ARGs and FC value

192

were calculated according to the formula:

193

R = Relative Gene Copy Number = 10((31−CT)/(10/3))

194

Normalized ARG Copy Number = (R /Relative16S rRNA Gene Copy Number) × 4.1

195

ΔCT = CT(ARG)−CT(16S)

196

ΔΔCT = CT(Target)−ΔCT(Ref)

197

FC = 2(−ΔΔCT)

198

CT was the threshold cycle, Target was the amended sample, Ref was the control

199

sample.27 To minimize potential variation in DNA extraction efficiencies, the relative

200

abundance of ARGs was normalized by 16S rRNA gene and converted to ARGs

201

copies per cell, of which 4.1 is the average number of 16S rRNA gene per

202

bacterium.32

203

Total and extractable arsenic. The freeze-dried earthworm body tissues and gut

204

contents were ground to fine powder in an agate mortar with liquid nitrogen prior to

205

analysis. The soil was dried at 25 oC and pulverized to 100 mesh prior to digestion.

206

The homogenized body tissues (30 mg) were precisely weighed into 50 mL


Page 10 of 37

Page 11 of 37


207

polypropylene tubes containing 7 mL of HNO3: H2O2 mixture (5+2 v/v) and allowed

208

to stand at room temperature for 2 h. Approximately 30 mg gut contents and 200 mg

209

soil samples were accurately weighed into 50 mL polypropylene digestion tubes

210

consisting of 7 mL of HNO3: HF mixture (6+1, v/v). All the tubes were transferred to

211

the microwave-accelerated system (CEM Microwave Technology Ltd., Buckingham,

212

UK). The procedure of microwave system was carried out following three stages:

213

105 °C for 20 min, 160 °C for 20 min, 180 °C for 30 min. The extraction of

214

bioavailable arsenic was constructed as follows. Soil (100 mg) and gut contents (30

215

mg) were dissolved in 5 mL of 0.05 M aqueous ammonium sulfate,33 and mixed on a

216

rotary wheel at 450 rpm for overnight. The mixture was centrifuged (5000 g, 15 min)

217

to gather the supernatant. The digest and extraction solution of all samples were

218

diluted to 50 mL with Milli-Q water and filtered through 0.22 μm syringe filters

219

(PVDF, Millipore, USA) prior to analysis. Arsenic concentration was determined by

220

ICP-MS 7500cx (Agilent technologies, USA). Arsenic species was analysed using

221

HPLC (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies, USA)-ICP-MS (Agilent 7700, Agilent

222

Technologies, USA) based on the previous method.26 The method was validated

223

against certified reference material (CRM, GBW07403 and GBW10024) from the

224

National Institute of Metrology of China. The recovery rates of CRM ranged from

225

92.1% to 106.7%. The Bio-concentration Factors (BF) was calculated using the ratio

226

of the total arsenic concentration in the earthworm body tissues to that in the

227

corresponding soil. The extraction efficiency and arsenic species of all samples was

228

shown in Table S2. Other soil properties were listed in Table S3. The analysis method



229

of soil properties was presented in Supporting Information.

230

Statistical Analysis. Mean values, standard errors (SE), and standard deviations (SD)

231

of all data were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2010. The abundance of bacterial

232

species and related genes in samples are shown as mean ± SE, and weight of

233

earthworm are presented as mean ± SD. PCoA based on the Bray−Curtis distance, the

234

diversity index (Shannon, PD Whole tree and Chao1), Adonis test, Procrustes test,

235

and mantel test were performed in R version 3.5.1. One-way analysis of variance,

236

t-tests and other significance tests were conducted with IBM SPSS V20 package.

237

RESULTS

238

Earthworm growth, mortality and arsenic bioaccumulation. The survival and the

239

growth rate of M. sieboldi under arsenic treatment, including As(V) alone and

240

combined with antibiotic, were decreased by 56.7-76.7% and 65-70% respectively,

241

compared to the control, in which lethality and growth inhibition were not found after

242

28-day culture (ANOVA, P < 0.01) (Figure 1a). Arsenic was not bio-accumulated by

243

the earthworm in the control and the treatment with sulfamethoxazole alone, of which

244

BF indexes were lower than 1. However, total arsenic concentrations in the body

245

tissues of M. sieboldi exposed to arsenic (As(V) alone and combined treatment), with

246

up to 190.1 and 145.5 mg kg-1, respectively, were much higher than those in the

247

corresponding soil, resulting in the increase of BF values (1.35-1.88) (Figure 1b).

248

Moreover, total arsenic concentrations of the body tissues were higher than those of

249

guts in the As(V) alone or the combination treatments. The extraction efficiency of


Page 12 of 37

Page 13 of 37


250

arsenic in the gut was significantly higher than that in soil (28.6%) (t-test, P 1 (S was the standard deviation of the ΔΔCt value), was considered for

664

the enrichment. If 2−(ΔΔCt-2S) < 1, was considered for the decrease.

665 666

Figure 4. Donut charts of bacterial relative abundance at the phylum (a) and family



667

(b) levels in the earthworm gut and surrounding soil.

668 669

Figure 5. Procrustes analysis and Mantel test of the relationship between the gut

670

microbial communities and ARG profiles based on Bray−Curtis dissimilarity metrics.


Page 32 of 37

Page 33 of 37





Page 34 of 37

Page 35 of 37




.9 %

3%

25

2% 4.

%

9.

4.3

%

2.7

3.9% %

3.8%

3.1% 3.0%

% 5 . 4 1

3

2.4%

2.7% ACS Paragon Plus Environment

. 2 %

10.5%

4 . 3 %

4 . 6 %

36%

4.6%

4.7% 4 . 7 %

14.2%

2.4%

%

9.1

4%

46.

.9%

4.1

5.1%

32

8.7%

6.7%

6% 8.

% 5 . 3

%

%

1

9.9

40

% 4 . 4

Page 36 of 37

Page 37 of 37



Arsenic and Sulfamethoxazole Increase the ... - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents