Assessing Polychlorinated Dibenzo - American Chemical Society

Subscriber access provided by MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY (UniNet)

Article

Assessing PCDD/Fs in air across Latin American countries using PUF disk passive air samplers Jasmin Katharina Schuster, Tom Harner, Gilberto Fillmann, Lutz Ahrens, Jorgelina Cecilia Altamirano, Wanderley Rodrigues Bastos, Luisa Eugenia Castillo, Johana Cortés, Oscar Fentanes, Alexey Gusev, Maricruz Hernandez, Martin Villa Ibarra, Nerina Belén Lana, Sum Chi Lee, Ana Patricia Martínez, Karina Miglioranza, Andrea Padilla Puerta, Federico Segovia, May Siu, Maria Yumiko Tominaga, and Beatriz Helena Aristizábal Zuluaga Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es506071n • Publication Date (Web): 16 Feb 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 18, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

Environmental Science & Technology

Assessing PCDD/Fs in air across Latin American countries using PUF disk passive air samplers Jasmin K. Schuster‡, Tom Harner‡*, Gilberto Fillmannβ, Lutz Ahrens‡, Jorgelina Cecilia Altamiranoθ, Wanderley Bastos∫, Luisa Eugenia Castillo♦, Johana Cortésα, Oscar Fentanes∇, Alexey Gusevε, Maricruz Hernandez•, Martín Villa Ibarraϒ, Nerina Belén Lana⊗, Sum Chi Lee‡, Ana Patricia Martínez∇, Karina S. B. Miglioranzaδ, Andrea Padilla Puerta∞, Federico Segovia•, May Siu◊, Maria Yumiko Tominagaγ, Beatriz Helena Aristizábal Zuluagaα

‡ Air Quality Processes Research Section, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON M3H 5T4, β Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto de Oceanografia, Rio Grande - RS, Brazil, θ Facultad de ciencias exactas y naturales, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina, ∫ Laboratório de Biogeoquímica Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil, ♦ Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances, Heredia, Costa Rica, α Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, Colombia, ∇ CENICA/INE, Naucalpan de Juárez, Mexico, ε Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-East (MSC-E), Moscow, Russia, • Ministerio del Ambiente de Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador, ϒ Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Cájeme, Cájeme, Sonora, México, ⊗ Laboratorio de Química Ambiental, Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales-CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina, δ Universidad Nacional Mar del Plata, CONICET, Mar el Plata , Argentina, ∞ Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Arauca, Colombia, ◊ Atmospheric Science & Technology Directorate, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3, γ CETESB, São Paulo, Brazil *corresponding author: [email protected]; tel. +1 416 739 4837

Word Count: Word count of tables: Word count of figures: Total:

~3400 ~300 ~1200 ~4900

Keywords: PCDD/Fs, GRULAC, air monitoring Brief: Assessing concentrations in air of PCDD/Fs in the GRULAC region to fill data demands under the Stockholm convention.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1


41

Page 2 of 21

Abstract

42

A passive air sampling network has been established to investigate

43

polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF) at

44

Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling (GAPS) sites and six additional sites in the Group of

45

Latin American and Caribbean Countries (GRULAC) region. The air sampling network

46

covers background, agricultural, rural and urban sites. Samples have been collected over

47

four consecutive periods of 6 months, which started in January 2011 (period 1 (January

48

2011 – June 2011), period 2 (July 2011 – December 2011), period 3 (January 2012 – June

49

2012) and period 4 (July 2012 – January 2013)). Results show that: i) the GAPS passive

50

samplers (PUF disk type) and analytical methodology are adequate for measuring

51

PCDD/F burdens in air, and ii) PCDD/F concentrations in air across the GRULAC region

52

are widely variable by almost two orders of magnitude. The highest concentrations in air

53

of Σ4-8PCDD/Fs was found at the urban site São Luis (Brazil, UR) (i.e. 2560 fg/m3)

54

followed by the sites in São Paulo (Brazil, UR), Mendoza (Argentina, RU) and Sonora

55

(Mexico, AG) with 1690 fg/m3, 1660 fg/m3 and 1610 fg/m3, respectively. Very low

56

concentrations of PCDD/Fs in air were observed at the background site Tapanti (Costa

57

Rica, BA) with 10.8 fg/m3. This variability is attributed to differences in site

58

characteristics and potential local/regional sources as well as meteorological influences.

59

The measurements of PCDD/Fs in air agree well with model predicted concentrations

60

performed using the Global EMEP Multi-media Modeling System (GLEMOS) and emission

61

scenario constructed on the basis of the UNEP Stockholm Convention inventory of dioxins

62

and furans emissions.

63 64

Introduction

65

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF)

66

are recognized as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) due to their properties of

67

persistence, potential to bioaccumulate and inherent toxicity to wildlife and humans1.


2

Page 3 of 21


68

Although PCDD/Fs are restricted under the Stockholm Convention on POPs, they are still

69

emitted unintentionally from numerous sources as by-products of chemical

70

manufacturing, incineration and other combustion-related activities2. This makes the

71

estimate of PCDD/Fs inventories and burdens more challenging compared to other

72

chemicals. The unintentional production of PCDD/Fs as by-products during the

73

production of other chemicals (i.e. polychlorinated biphenyls, pentachlorophenol,

74

trichlorobenzene) and in industrial processes involving chloro-organic compounds (i.e.

75

pulp and paper industry) used to be a major source, leading to PCDD/Fs emissions via

76

contamination products (i.e. pentachlorophenol-treated wood, leather, textiles) and

77

emissions directly to water and soil. Stricter legislation and the introduction of new

78

processes reduced these sources significantly in most countries1. Nowadays thermal

79

processes are the major sources of PCDD/Fs to the air e.g. municipal solid waste

80

incineration (MSWI) with PCDD/Fs associated with fly and bottom ash. While the

81

PCDD/Fs emissions from MSWI has been reduced in recent years through optimizing

82

incineration conditions, this still provides the major contribution to the total PCDD/Fs

83

emissions in most countries1.

84

Under Article 16 of the Stockholm Convention, dealing with its Effectiveness

85

Evaluation, there is a need to measure PCDD/Fs in air under a regionally based Global

86

Monitoring Plan (GMP). Air is one of two core media targeted under the GMP (human

87

tissues being the other). The measurements in air should include both temporal and

88

spatial resolution in order to evaluate effectiveness of control measures and to provide

89

information on the long-range transport of PCDD/Fs. Air monitoring data for PCDD/F

90

from national networks are available for Northern America from the Canadian National

91

Air Pollution Surveillance network (NAPS), the U.S. National Dioxin Air Monitoring

92

Network (NDAMN) and the Mexican Dioxin Air Monitoring Network (MDAMN) 3.

93

In the first GMP report submitted in 2009, it was recognized that information on

94

PCDD/Fs in air in the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States (GRULAC) were


3


Page 4 of 21

95

lacking. Fiedler (2007) recently published a review of PCDD/Fs emission estimates

96

provided to UNEP by participating countries. 4 The review highlighted MSWI as the main

97

PCDD/F source to air, followed by open burning processes, and heat and power

98

generation. The UNEP global emission inventory for PCDD/Fs was used to link emissions

99

to a country’s economic status5 and in the Global EMEP Multi-media Modelling System

100

(GLEMOS) to estimate global PCDD/F concentrations in air6.

101

Thus the objective of this project was to further assess the suitability of the

102

Polyurethane foam (PUF) disks passive air sampler for PCDD/Fs and to address this data

103

gap and implement an air monitoring network for PCDD/Fs that can deliver baseline

104

information on PCDD/Fs in air. It will also serve as a baseline against which future

105

concentrations in air can be compared so as to inform on the ‘Effectiveness’ of the

106

Stockholm Convention on POPs on reducing levels of PCDD/Fs in air in the GRULAC

107

region.

108 109 110

Method

111 112

Study Design

113

The compounds targeted in this study are the tetra (TCDD/Fs), penta- (PeCDD/Fs),

114

hexa- (HxCDD/Fs), hepta- (HpCDD/Fs) and octa-chlorinated (OCDD/Fs) dibenzo-p-

115

dioxins/furans. Results are reported as the sums of the homologue groups as well as the

116

17 individual 2,3,7,8 chloro-substituted PCDD/Fs (2,3,7,8-TCDF, 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF,

117

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF, 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,7,8,9-

118

HxCDF, 1,23,4,6,7,8-HpCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF, OCDF, 2,3,7,8-TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD,

119

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD, OCDD).

120

Passive air samples were collected during the period from January 2011 – March

121

2013 at 13 sites in six South American countries (Mexico, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Colombia,


4

Page 5 of 21


122

Brazil, Argentina). The sampling sites spanned a longitude of 44–110 °W and a latitude

123

of 52 °S–27 °N. The average temperatures at the sites during the deployment period

124

ranged from 7.6 °C at the most Southern site to 25.8 °C at the Northern sites. The

125

sampling sites were classified as “background” (BA, n = 6), “agricultural” (AG, n = 1),

126

“rural” (RU, n = 3) and “urban” (UR, n = 3) depending on land use and population

127

density. The sampling periods were about 6 months and the consecutive samples

128

collected per site vary (n = 1–4) (period 1 (January 2011 – June 2011), period 2 (July

129

2011 – December 2011), period 3 (January 2012 – June 2012) and period 4 (July 2012 –

130

January 2013)). The sampling period of 6 months ensures a higher effective sampling

131

volume for PCDD/Fs and allows for a higher accumulation of the target chemicals on the

132

sampling medium in background areas. Supplementary information (SI) Figure 1 and SI

133

Tables 1 and 2 summarize information on the sites that comprise the PCDD/F passive air

134

monitoring network.

135 136

Pre-cleaning procedure for passive sampling media

137

PUF disks were pre-cleaned using Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE) (1 cycle of 200 mL

138

acetone and 2 cycles of 200 mL hexane) and dried under ultra high purity (UHP) grade

139

nitrogen in a vacuum oven at 30 - 40°C. PUF disks were stored in 1 L amber jars for

140

shipping.

141 142

Sample Collection

143

A sampling kit including a sampling protocol, pre-cleaned PUF disks and passive

144

sampler housing was shipped from Environment Canada to the participating partners on

145

site. Details to the sampling process can be found in the sampling protocol in the SI Text

146

1. In short, sampler housing was installed at a minimum of 2 m from the ground in

147

unobstructed air flow. PUF disks were installed and removed from the sampler housing

148

using clean forceps. Sampling media was stored at a dark and cool place prior to and


5


Page 6 of 21

149

after deployment. Field blanks (n = 14) were collected by following the same steps as for

150

the air samples but without actual deployment. The field blanks are used to assess

151

possible contamination associated with the methodology and sample treatment.

152

Samples were returned to Environment Canada for analysis.

153 154

Extraction and analysis

155

PUF disks were spiked with a known amount of isotopically labelled surrogate

156

standards (13C12-TCDD, 13C12-TCDF, 13C12-PeCDD, 13C12-PeCDF, 13C12-HxCDD, 13C12-HxCDF,

157

13

158

Laboratories Inc., Guelph, Ontario) and then extracted with toluene by Soxhlet

159

apparatus for 16-20 hours. After extraction, samples were cleaned up using column

160

chromatography with an acid/base column followed by an activated alumina column.

161

The fraction containing the PCDD/Fs was eluted with dichloromethane (DCM)/hexane

162

(50/50, v/v) and blown down to dryness. A known concentration of internal standard

163

(13C12-1,2,3,4-TCDD and

164

chromatography (GC)/high resolution mass spectrometry (Agilent 6890 and Waters

165

MicromassAutoSpecUltima HRMS). Samples were analysed with electron impact

166

ionisation in selective ion mode on a 60 m DB-5 column (0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm film

167

thickness). Samples were injected in splitless mode (injector temperature of 290°C) with

168

helium as the carrier gas. The GC oven temperature program began at 100 °C for 1 min

169

and was increased by 35 °C/min to 200 °C, then by 4 °C/min to 280°C, where it was held

170

for 15 min and then by 10 °C/min to 300 °C, where it was held for 5 min 3, 7.

C12-HpCDD,

13

C12-HpCDF,

13

13

C12-OCDD, all standards were supplied by Wellington

C12-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD) was added prior to analysis by gas

171 172

Quality assurance and quality control QA/QC

173

Results for field blanks and method recoveries are presented in SI Tables 3 and 4.

174

Average recoveries of surrogates ranged from 93%–103% and analysis of field blanks

175

showed no major contamination issues, with most PCDD/Fs falling below instrumental


6

Page 7 of 21


176

detection limit in field blanks. The method detection limit (MDL) was calculated as the

177

average concentration of the field blanks plus 3 times standard deviation of the field

178

blanks. The MDL is reported in SI Table 3. For data interpretation values below MDL

179

were replaced by 2/3*MDL.

180 181

Global EMEP Multi-media Modelling System (GLEMOS)

182

PCDD/F air concentrations for the sampling sites were estimated using GLEMOS and the

183

UNEP Stockholm Convention emissions inventory of dioxins and furans. Details on

184

GLEMOS and the emission inventory are discussed by Gusev et al. 6, 8

185 186

Results and Discussion

187

Passive air sampling basics for PCDD/Fs

188

PCDD/Fs are semi-volatile compounds and at ambient temperatures most of the

189

PCDD/Fs are associated with the particle-phase rather than the gas - phase due to their

190

low volatility9. At the temperatures observed during the study only the lighter

191

homologue groups (TCDFs, PeCDFs, TCDDs) will be found predominately in the gas-

192

phase10. A recent analysis of PUF disks samplers for the uptake of the mostly particle

193

bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons indicates that particle-phase compounds are

194

captured at similar rates as the gas-phase compounds11, 12. Mari et al. (2008) published

195

data on PCDD/Fs acquired simultaneously by passive and active air sampling. Average

196

PCDD/F sampling rate values estimated from concentrations in the combined gas and

197

particle-phase were more realistic (2.0 m3/day) than values estimated solely from the

198

gas phase concentration (25 m3/day)13.

199

The conversion to concentration in air basis involves the derivation of effective air

200

sample volumes as is done under the GAPS Network14,

201

assumed for the PCDD/Fs for the entire sampling period due to their low volatility.

202

Therefore the equivalent air volume is simply the product of the linear gas-phase


15

. A linear uptake can be

7


Page 8 of 21

203

sampling rate of the PUF disks sampler (i.e. ~4 m3/day) and the deployment time (e.g.

204

180 days for a 6-month deployment). This results in an effective air sample volume of

205

about 720 m3.

206 207

Monitored PCDD/F concentrations in air

208

Σ4-8PCDD/F concentrations (average, minimum, maximum) in air are summarized in

209

Table 1. Concentrations in air observed during the 6 month deployment periods are

210

reported in the SI Table 5. The highest concentrations in air of Σ4-8PCDD/Fs were at the

211

urban site São Luis (Brazil, UR) (i.e. 2560 fg/m3) while the lowest concentrations were at

212

the background site Tapanti (Costa Rica, BA) with 10.8 fg/m3. Correlations were carried

213

out between the observed PCDD/F concentrations in air and site specific properties such

214

as land use, latitude and average temperatures. No significant trends were observed.

215

This suggests that PCDD/F concentrations in air are more likely associated with local

216

sources.

217

At the majority of sites two consecutive 6-months samples were collected. There

218

was no substantial difference between the sampling periods at the individual sites. The

219

PCDD/F data from the sites Sonora (Mexico, AG), Yucatan (Mexico, BA), Manizales

220

(Colombia, BA) and Arauca (Colombia, RU) is available for all four sampling intervals

221

between January 2011 – December 2012. No substantial differences or seasonal trends

222

were observed between the PCDD/F concentrations in air for the different 6-month

223

sampling periods at the individual sites (Figure 1 fore Sonora and SI Figure 2 for Yucatan,

224

Manizales and Arauca). Other studies have reported seasonal variations for PCDD/F

225

concentrations in air between winter and summer seasons10,

226

month sampling periods in the current study span both winter and summer months and

227

so no seasonal variations are expected.

16, 17

. However, the 6-

228

The toxic equivalent (TEQ) values were calculated for the 17 most toxic 2,3,7,8-

229

chloro-substituted PCDD/Fs using international toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) 1. The


8

Page 9 of 21


230

highest monitored TEQ values were found for 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF with

231

average values of 3.2 fg TEQ/m3 (0.10–12 fg TEQ/m3) and 3.0 fg TEQ/m3 (0.13–14 fg

232

TEQ/m3) respectively. The values for Σ17TEQ PCDD/Fs ranged from 0.7–43 fg TEQ/m3with

233

the highest concentrations observed at São Luis (Brazil, UR), and the lowest quantifiable

234

data at Salta (Argentina, BA). Average values for Σ4-8PCDD/Fs are reported in Table 1.

235

Values monitored at Tapanti for the individual 2,3,7,8 chloro-substituted were all

236

below MDL. The concentration trends for the Σ17TEQ PCDD/Fs values mirrors the trends

237

observed for the total Σ4-8PCDD/F concentrations in air with the higher values of 30 fg

238

TEQ/m3, 24 fg TEQ/m3 and 24 fg TEQ/m3monitored at São Paulo (Brazil, UR), Mendoza

239

(Argentina, RU) and Sonora (Mexico, AG) respectively. Figure 2 shows the distribution of

240

the average TEQ concentrations in air for the individual congeners at all sites.

241 242

Comparison to PCDD/Fs levels published in other studies

243

The TEQ values observed for the GRULAC region in this study are in the same order

244

of magnitude as other concentrations in air reported in recent studies. Bogdal et al.

245

(2013) reported concentrations derived from passive samplers deployed between 2010

246

and 2011 in the GRULAC region –ranging from 9–678 fg TEQ/m3 18, 19. As two sites that

247

were monitored in the 2010–2011 study were also used in the present study, a direct

248

comparison of the observed concentrations in air is possible. Bogdal et al. (2013)

249

published monitoring results as sample loads (pg/PUF), which were here converted to

250

concentrations in air for comparison reasons by applying the sampling rate of 4 m3/day

251

resulting in derived average TEQ concentrations for São Paulo (Brazil, UR) and Quito

252

(Ecuador, UR) of 34 fg TEQ/m3 and 5.3 fg TEQ/m3. These are within a factor of two of

253

results from the present study of 25 fg TEQ/m3 (January 2012 – December 2012) and 3.6

254

fg TEQ/m3 (January 2011 – December 2011), respectively. The present study observed

255

an average concentration in air of 4.6 fg TEQ/m3 between January 2011 – December

256

2012 at the background site Manizales (Colombia, BA) in a nature reserve 11 km from


9


Page 10 of 21

257

the city limits, whereas Aristizábal et al. (2011) reported values between 1–52 fg

258

TEQ/m3 for 2009–2010 at an urban site in Manizales 20. The MDAMN study site Celestún

259

at Yucatan is identical with the site in this study. MDAMN applied active air samplers

260

and results from 2011 - 2012 show a PCDD/F concentration in air for four 6-day samples

261

ranging from 5.6 – 26 fg TEQ/m3. With the exception of one unusually high value

262

reported by MDAMN for February 2012, the 6 months integrated PCDD/F

263

concentrations from the present study that range from 5.7 - 8.2 fg TEQ/m3 are in the

264

same range as the MDAMN values 3.

265

Other studies reported a wide range of PCDD/F concentrations in air for other areas

266

around the world. Bogdal et al. (2013) reported concentrations in air ranging from 18–

267

532 fg TEQ/m3 and 1–87 fg TEQ/m3 for Africa and the Pacific Islands respectively 19. For

268

Europe recent values were reported for Catalonia, Spain with 17–348 fg TEQ/m3 (for

269

1994–2002 for 28 sites, Abad et al. (2004) 21), for Barcelona, Spain with 11–39 fg TEQ/m3

270

(2005, Mari et al. (2008) 13), for Italy with 2.9–65 fg TEQ/m3 (2000–2001, Menichini et al.

271

(2007)

272

(2014) 16) and for the UK as < 50 fg TEQ/m3 (2005 – 2008, Katsoyiannis et al. (2010)23). Li

273

et al. (2011) reported concentrations in air of 1–145 fg TEQ/m3 in Anshan, Northeast

274

China for 2008–2009 17.

22

), for Zurich, Switzerland with 11–190 fg TEQ/m3 (2010–2011, Bogdal et al.

275 276

Comparison to modelled PCDD/Fs levels

277

Measured PCDD/F air concentrations in the GRULAC region were compared with the

278

results of a pilot modelling study, performed using the Global EMEP Multi-media

279

Modeling System (GLEMOS) and emission scenario constructed on the basis of the UNEP

280

Stockholm Convention inventory of dioxins and furans emissions6, 8. Model predictions

281

obtained for 2012 were in a reasonable agreement with measured air concentrations.

282

For more than a half of the sites modelled values were within a factor of two with

283

measurements and found to correlate with observed levels (Figure 3.). Some sites


10

Page 11 of 21


284

showed higher concentrations than predicted by the model, especially for some of the

285

rural and urban sites (e.g. São Luis, Mendoza). The highest difference was obtained for

286

the site Rio Gallegos (more than an order of magnitude), which is likely caused by the

287

uncertainties in spatial distribution of PCDD/F emissions. The model used population

288

densities for the estimations of the PCDD/F emissions grid and possibly underestimated

289

local PCDD/F sources.

290 291

PCDD/F homologue distribution

292

The PCDD/F homologue contributions to Σ4-8PCDD/F can be an indication of the

293

origin of the emissions and/or reflect weathering after emission. In general, the most

294

dominant PCDD/Fs in the present study were OCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF with average

295

concentrations of 35 fg/m3 and 30 fg/m3, respectively. This agrees with the general

296

pattern reported for the 2,3,7,8-substituted PCDD/Fs in air

297

concentrations in air were previously explained by a lower atmospheric removal rate

298

compared to other PCDDs.

299

dominant PCDD/Fs homologues that are released during biomass burning.

300

from more industrial emission profiles and might be related to ongoing deforestation

301

processes in some countries of the GRULAC region. The PCDF congeners show

302

decreasing concentrations in air with increasing degree of chlorination; whereas PCDDs

303

show increasing concentrations in air with increasing degree of chlorination (Figure 4).

304

This pattern was observed in PCDD/F air sampling campaigns carried out with both

305

passive and active samplers, which is further evidence that the PUF disk sampler is

306

suitable for monitoring both gas- and particle - phase PCDD/Fs 10.

307

24

10, 13

. Higher OCDD

Gullett and Tuoati also reported OCDD and TCDFs as the 25

This differs

In general, the relative contributions of the individual PCDD/F congeners to Σ4-

308

8PCDD/F

309

Manizales (Colombia, BA), Arauca (Colombia, RU) and São Luis (Brazil, UR) exhibited

310

consistently mass% (2,3,7,8-TCDF) > mass% (OCDD), which sets their congener pattern

were consistent for most sites in the present study. However, the three sites


11


Page 12 of 21

311

apart from the other sites in this study. This likely reflects a different dominant PCDD/F

312

emission source for these three sites compared to the other sites in this study.

313

Overall there was no shift in the PCDD/F contributions between the different sampling

314

periods at the individual sites.

315 316

The ratio of ΣPCDDs/ΣPCDFs ranged from 0.18–1.2 which is within the reported range of 0.13–21 10.

317 318

Implications

319

This study is among the first to report concentrations of PCDD/Fs in air in South

320

America. In addition to establishing baseline data for air across the region, the study

321

establishes a suitable monitoring network for PCDD/Fs that is based on the GAPS

322

Network and the PUF disk passive air sampler. This cost effective approach is a model

323

that can be used in other regions to assess spatial and temporal trends of PCDD/Fs for

324

reporting under the Global Monitoring Plan of the Stockholm Convention on POPs.

325

Furthermore the study demonstrates how the results from passive samplers can be

326

integrated with emission inventories and models to better assess the effectiveness of

327

control measures.

328 329

Acknowledgement

330

We would like to thank UNEP for funding, our collaborators at the GRULAC sampling

331

sites and Jean-Pierre Charland and Gary Poole of the NAPS Network for analytical

332

support. Field work in Mendoza, Argentina was supported by Consejo Nacional de

333

Investigaciones Científica y Técnicas, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y

334

Tecnológica, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Organization for Prohibition of Chemical

335

Weapons and Pierre Auger Observatory. We also thank Ramon Guardans for useful

336

discussions. G. Fillmann was sponsored by the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq PQ

337

312341/2013-0).


12

Page 13 of 21


338 339

Supplementary information

340

Supplementary information is available for this publication. The SI contains individual

341

PCDD/Fs data observed in this study, information on the sampling sites and the

342

sampling protocol provided to the participants of this study. This information is available

343

free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/ .

344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375

References 1. Fiedler, H., Dioxins and furans (PCDD/PCDF). In Persistent Organic Pollutants, Springer: 2003; pp 123-201. 2. Lee, W.-S.; Chang-Chien, G.-P.; Wang, L.-C.; Lee, W.-J.; Tsai, P.-J.; Wu, K.-Y.; Lin, C., Source identification of PCDD/Fs for various atmospheric environments in a highly industrialized city. Environmental science & technology 2004, 38, (19), 4937-4944. 3. Wöhrnschimmel, H.; Yao, Y. Assessing Comparability of Atmospheric PCDD, PCDF and Coplanar PCB Data from North American Ambient Air Monitoring Networks 2014-09-01, 2014. 4. Fiedler, H., National PCDD/PCDF release inventories under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Chemosphere 2007, 67, (9), S96-S108. 5. Cao, Z.; Fiedler, H.; Wang, B.; Zhang, T.; Yu, G.; Huang, J.; Deng, S., Economic status as a determinant of national PCDD/PCDF releases and implications for PCDD/PCDF reduction. Chemosphere 2013, 91, (3), 328-335. 6. Gusev, A.; Rozovskaya, O.; Shatalov, V.; Aas, W.; Nizzetto, P. Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Environment; Meteorological Synthesizing Centre East, Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU): 2014. 7. Dann, T., Ambient Air Measurements of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins (PCDD) and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans in Canada (1987-1997). Le Centre, Environnement Canada.: 1998. 8. Gusev, A.; Shatalov, V.; Rozovskaya, O., Pilot Modelling of PCDD/F Transport and Fate on Global Scale and within the European Region. Organohalogen compounds In press. 9. Harner, T.; Green, N. J.; Jones, K. C., Measurements of octanol-air partition coefficients for PCDD/Fs: A tool in assessing air-soil equilibrium status. Environmental science & technology 2000, 34, (15), 3109-3114.


13


376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418

Page 14 of 21

10. Lohmann, R.; Jones, K. C., Dioxins and furans in air and deposition: a review of levels, behaviour and processes. Science of the Total Environment 1998, 219, (1), 53-81. 11. Harner, T.; Su, K.; Genualdi, S.; Karpowicz, J.; Ahrens, L.; Mihele, C.; Schuster, J.; Charland, J.-P.; Narayan, J., Calibration and application of PUF disk passive air samplers for tracking polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs). Atmospheric Environment 2013, 75, 123-128. 12. Eng, A.; Harner, T.; Pozo, K., A Prototype Passive Air Sampler for Measuring Dry Deposition of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2013, 1, (1), 77-81. 13. Mari, M.; Schuhmacher, M.; Feliubadaló, J.; Domingo, J. L., Air concentrations of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PCNs using active and passive air samplers. Chemosphere 2008, 70, (9), 1637-1643. 14. Pozo, K.; Harner, T.; Lee, S. C.; Wania, F.; Muir, D. C.; Jones, K. C., Seasonally resolved concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in the global atmosphere from the first year of the GAPS study. Environmental science & technology 2009, 43, (3), 796-803. 15. Shoeib, M.; Harner, T., Characterization and comparison of three passive air samplers for persistent organic pollutants. Environmental Science & Technology 2002, 36, (19), 4142-4151. 16. Bogdal, C.; Müller, C. E.; Buser, A. M.; Wang, Z.; Scheringer, M.; Gerecke, A. C.; Schmid, P.; Zennegg, M.; MacLeod, M.; Hungerbühler, K., Emissions of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans during 2010 and 2011 in Zurich, Switzerland. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48, (1), 482-490. 17. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, P.; Yang, H.; Jiang, G.; Wei, F., Evaluation of atmospheric sources of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PBDEs around a steel industrial complex in northeast China using passive air samplers. Chemosphere 2011, 84, (7), 957-963. 18. Bogdal, C. Report on Passive Air Sampling under the Global Monitoring Plan for Persistent Organic Pollutants - GMP Projects 2010-2011 United Nations Environment Programme/DTIE: United Nations Environment Programme/DTIE, 2012. 19. Bogdal, C.; Scheringer, M.; Abad, E.; Abalos, M.; van Bavel, B.; Hagberg, J.; Fiedler, H., Worldwide distribution of persistent organic pollutants in air, including results of air monitoring by passive air sampling in five continents. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2013, 46, (0), 150-161. 20. Aristizábal, B. H.; Gonzalez, C. M.; Morales, L.; Abalos, M.; Abad, E., Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran in urban air of an Andean city. Chemosphere 2011, 85, (2), 170-178. 21. Abad, E.; Caixach, J.; Rivera, J.; Gustems, L.; Massagué, G.; Puig, O., Temporal trends of PCDDs/PCDFs in ambient air in Catalonia (Spain). Science of The Total Environment 2004, 334–335, (0), 279-285.


14

Page 15 of 21

419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432


22. Menichini, E.; Iacovella, N.; Monfredini, F.; Turrio-Baldassarri, L., Atmospheric pollution by PAHs, PCDD/Fs and PCBs simultaneously collected at a regional background site in central Italy and at an urban site in Rome. Chemosphere 2007, 69, (3), 422-434. 23. Katsoyiannis, A.; Gioia, R.; Sweetman, A. J.; Jones, K. C., Continuous Monitoring of PCDD/Fs in the UK Atmosphere: 1991−2008. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44, (15), 5735-5740. 24. Brubaker, W. W.; Hites, R. A., Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans: Gas-Phase Hydroxyl Radical Reactions and Related Atmospheric Removal. Environmental Science & Technology 1997, 31, (6), 18051810. 25. Gullett, B. K.; Touati, A., PCDD/F emissions from forest fire simulations. Atmospheric Environment 2003, 37, (6), 803-813.


15


433

Table 1. Information on the 13 sampling sites, average concentrations, minimum and maximum valuesa Site Sonora Yucatan Tapanti Quito Manizales Arauca São Paulo São Luis São Jose dos Ausentes Salta Malargüe Mendoza Rio Gallegos

434 435 436 437 438 439

Page 16 of 21

Long [º] -109.9 -90.4 -83.9 -78.5 -75.4 -70.8 -46.7 -44.1

Σ4-8PCDD/Fs [fg/m3]

Σ17TEQ PCDD/Fs [fg TEQ/m3]

24.5 25.8 14.1 15.9 13.6 27.3 20.5 27.9

Lat [º] 27.1 20.9 9.8 -0.1 5.1 7.1 -23.6 -2.4

Mean 1311 546 14 213 286 167 1581 1629

Min 893 513 11 208 223 128 1468 701

Max 1608 606 18 218 444 195 1694 2557

Mean 20 7.3

Assessing Polychlorinated Dibenzo - American Chemical Society

Recommend Documents