Asymmetric Synthesis of Nonracemic 2-Amino[6]helicenes and Their

Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE

Asymmetric Synthesis of Nonracemic 2-Amino[6]helicenes and Their Self-Assembly into Langmuir Films Manfred Karras, Jan Holec, Lucie Bednarova, Radek Pohl, Bernd Schmidt, Irena G. Stará, and Ivo Stary J. Org. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b00538 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Apr 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 20, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Asymmetric Synthesis of Nonracemic 2-Amino[6]helicenes and Their Self-Assembly into Langmuir Films

Manfred Karras,†,‡ Jan Holec,† Lucie Bednárová,† Radek Pohl,† Bernd Schmidt,*,‡ Irena G. Stará,*,† and Ivo Starý*,† †

Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo n. 2, 166

10 Prague 6, Czech Republic. ‡

Universitaet Potsdam, Institut fuer Chemie, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm,

Germany

ABSTRACT: Alternative ways of preparing nonracemic 2-amino[6]helicene derivatives were explored. The enantioselective [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization of a nonchiral triyne under Ni(cod)2/(R)QUINAP catalysis delivered the enantioenriched (+)-(P)-2-aminodibenzo[6]helicene derivative in 67% ee. An ultimate “point-to-helical” chirality transfer was observed in the cyclization of enantiopure triynes mediated by Ni(CO)2(PPh)2 affording (-)-(M)- or (+)-(P)-7,8-bis(ptolyl)hexahelicen-2-amine in >99% ee as well as its benzoderivative in >99% ee. The latter mode of stereocontrol was inefficient for a 2-aminobenzo[6]helicene congener with an embedded fivemembered ring. The rac-, (-)-(M)- and (+)-(P)-7,8-bis(p-tolyl)hexahelicen-2-amines formed Langmuir monolayers at the air-water interface featuring practically identical surface pressure vs. mean molecular area isotherms. The corresponding Langmuir-Blodgett films on quartz or silicon substrates were characterized by UV-Vis/ECD spectroscopy or AFM microscopy, respectively.

INTRODUCTION The application of helicenes1 to different branches of science critically depends on the availability of their functionalized derivatives in an enantiopure form. In particular, fully aromatic aminohelicenes represent an attractive class of compounds as they feature robust, inherently chiral helical scaffolds and versatile functionality. Examples for aminohelicenes are 1,2-diamino[4]helicene,2 3amino[5]helicene derivative,3 3-amino[6]helicene derivatives,4 5-amino[6]helicene,5 6,111

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 35

diamino[6]helicene derivatives,6 9-amino[7]helicene,7 and heterocyclic,8 cationic9 or hydrogenated10 congeners. However, none of them was synthesized in an asymmetric fashion (with one exception, vide infra) and the respective nonracemic aminohelicenes could be obtained by the resolution of their racemic precursors by HPLC on a chiral column5b,11 or by crystallization with a chiral resolving agent.9 The most recent contributions to the field, which were published almost simultaneously to this study, described innovative approaches to 2-amino[6]helicene and its derivatives capitalizing on coupling chemistry of [6]helicen-2-ylboronates12a or 2-bromo[6]helicene.12b Also here, enantiopure aminohelicenes and their derivatives were obtained via chromatographic resolution of the racemic helicenylboronate or bromohelicene precursors or through separation of diastereomeric helicenylboronates by crystallization. Nevertheless, the first intriguing applications of aminohelicenes and their congeners to surface science5b,13 or enantioselective catalysis8b,14,15 have already appeared. Recently, some of us developed a straightforward approach to enantiopure 2H-pyran-modified amino[5]helicenes and amino[6]helicenes14 utilizing asymmetric synthesis that relied on an efficient stereocontrol by the 1,3-allylic-type strain.16 Furthermore, we demonstrated a promising approach to highly enantioenriched unfunctionalized dibenzohelicenes by employing enantioselective catalysis.14,17 Naturally, it raised the question whether such methodologies might also be adapted for the synthesis of enantiopure fully aromatic aminohelicenes. Herein, we report the synthesis of racemic 2-aminodibenzo[6]helicene rac-1 as well as its enantioenriched derivative (+)-(P)-13 (by utilizing enantioselective catalysis), enantiopure 2amino[6]helicenes (-)-(M)-2, (+)-(P)-2, and the respective benzo derivative (-)-(M)-3 (by employing diastereoselective synthesis; Figure 1). The latter mode of stereocontrol failed in the case of 2aminobenzo[6]helicene derivative 4. The racemic and enantiopure aminohelicene 2 formed stable Langmuir monolayers at the air-water interface. The corresponding Langmuir-Blodgett films on quartz or silicon plates were characterized by UV-Vis/ECD spectroscopy and AFM microscopy.

Tol

Tol Tol

H2N

R 2N

(+)-(P)-2

(-)-(M)-2

rac-1 R=H (+)-(P)-13 R=Boc

OMOM Tol

Tol Tol H2N

(-)-(M)-3

Tol H2N

Tol Bn2N

4

Figure 1. The target 2-amino[6]helicenes 1‒4.

2


Page 3 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Nonracemic Aminohelicenes by Enantioselective Catalysis. First, we embarked on the preparation of rac-1 to verify the tolerance of the previously developed synthetic methodology17 to the presence of an amino moiety (Scheme 1). The starting materials 2-bromo-1-iodonaphthalene 5 (ref. 17) and 4-bromo-3-iodoaniline 7 were smoothly converted into the dibromo intermediate 9 bearing a protected amino group. It underwent a double Suzuki-Miyaura coupling with boronic acid 10 (ref. 17) delivering the silylated triyne 11. After desilylation, triyne 12 was subjected to the Ni0-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization to provide the protected 2-aminodibenzo[6]helicene rac-13. An easy removal of Boc groups by trifluoroacetic acid liberated the target 2-aminodibenzo[6]helicene rac-1. To our delight, all the key transition metal catalyzed synthetic operations such as Sonogashira coupling, Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, and alkyne [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization were not affected by the presence of the Boc-protected amino group. Moreover, the use of the chiral ligand (R)-QUINAP in the Ni0catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization of triyne 12 (QUINAP was identified earlier as one of the most promising chiral ligands for this enantioselective process)14,17,18 led to the enantioenriched (+)(P)-13 with promising 67% ee (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. The synthesis of the racemic 2-amino-dibenzo[6]helicene rac-1, rac-13, and its enantioenriched derivative (+)-(P)-13 (1) T IPS Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI Br i-Pr NH, rt, 18 h 2

I

Br

(2) n-Bu4NF, CH3OH THF, rt, 4 h, 74%

5 R2N

6

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI i-Pr2NH, rt, 3 h 97% (Boc)2O, DMAP THF, reflux, 2 h 95%

Br I 7 R=H 8 R=Boc R (Boc) 2N

TIPS

(HO) 2B

(Boc) 2N 10 Br

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, K2CO3 toluene, n-PrOH, H2O reflux, 6 h, 87%

9

R 11 R=TIPS 12 R=H

Br

n-Bu4NF, CH3OH THF, rt, 16 h, 76%

Ni(cod)2, PPh3 THF, rt, 1 h, 86% or Ni(cod)2, (R)-QUINAP THF, -20 to 0 oC, 16 h 90%, 67% ee ((+)-(P))

R2N

rac- or (+)-(P)-13 R=Boc rac-1 R=H (from rac-13)

TFA, CH2Cl2 rt, 18 h, 99%


3


Page 4 of 35

Nonracemic Aminohelicenes by Diastereoselective Synthesis. For the sake of receiving aminohelicenes in an enantiopure form, we turned our attention to their diastereoselective synthesis utilizing accessible enantiopure building blocks.16b To this end, we transformed the benzylated 3iodoaniline 1419 to the racemic diyne rac-18 within a routine four-step synthetic sequence (Scheme 2). Sonogashira coupling of that with the naphthyl iodide derivative (-)-(S)-19 (prepared in an enantiopure form by a biocatalytic method)16b and desilylation gave rise to triyne (RS,S)-20 as a 1:1 mixture of two diastereomers. After attaching the p-tolyl groups (20→21), we attempted [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization of (RS,S)-21 in the presence of the air-stable Ni(CO)2(PPh3)2. The reaction was combined with the asymmetric transformation of the first kind ultimately controlled by the 1,3-allylictype strain to deliver two diastereomers (M,RS,S)-22 in a 1:1 ratio differing in the configuration at one stereogenic center but possessing the same helicity (>99% de with respect to the helicity). Acidassisted elimination of both the methoxymethoxy groups led to the removal of stereogenic centers and

Scheme 2. The synthesis of enantiopure 2-amino[6]helicene (-)-(M)-2 Bn2N

Bn2N

POCl3 DMF 0 to 50 °C, 6 h 95%

I 14

CHO I 15 TIPS

(1)

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI Bn2N i-Pr2NH, rt, 5 h

Bn2N

(2) K2CO3, CH3OH TIPS rt, 3 h, 97%

OMOM rac-18 (1)

n-BuLi, THF -78 °C, 20 min 96%

T MS

I

I rac-16 R=H

TIPS

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI OMOM

rac-17 R=MOM

i-Pr2NH, rt, 16 h

(-)-(S)-19, >99% ee

OR

TIPS

MOMCl, DMAP i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2 35 °C, 16 h 93%

(2) n-Bu4NF, THF rt, 5 h, 77% MOMO

Bn2N

Tol R R

OMOM

Ni(CO)2(PPh3)2 toluene 150 °C, 15 min 82%, >99% de

Tol Bn2N

OMOM

(M,RS,S)-22

(RS,S)-20 R=H (RS,S)-21 R=Tol

OMOM

I

p-TsOH toluene 40 oC, 16 h 94%

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI i-Pr2NH, rt, 16 h, 94% Tol Tol R2N

(-)-(M)-23 R=Bn NH4HCO3, Pd/C EtOH, reflux, 2 h (-)-(M)-2 R=H 20 97% >99% ee, ]D -2 073

4


Page 5 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


full aromatization of the backbone affording (-)-(M)-23. Hydrogenolytic cleavage of the benzyl groups afforded the target enantiopure 2-amino[6]helicene (-)-(M)-2 (>99% ee). Employing the enantiopure building block (+)-(R)-19, the enantiopure 2-amino[6]helicene (+)-(P)-2 (>99% ee, [α]D20 +2 173) of the opposite helicity was obtained. The ECD spectra of (+)-(P)-2 correlated with the known ECD spectrum of (+)-(P)-[6]helicene20 are shown in SI (Figure S9). Actually, the asymmetric synthesis of the enantiopure 2-aminobenzo[6]helicene (-)-(M)-3 combined both the aforementioned approaches (Scheme 3). Also here, the helicity control was realized through [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization of the enantiopure triyne (+)-(S)-29 followed by asymmetric transformation controlled by the 1,3-allylic-type strain. This “point-to-helical” chirality transfer was again highly efficient as the formation of a single diastereomer (-)-(M,S)-30 was observed (>99% de). It was finally aromatized by eliminating the traceless chiral auxiliary group to receive the enantiopure (-)-(M)-3 (for the ECD spectrum, see SI, Figure S8 and S9).

Scheme 3. The synthesis of enantiopure 2-aminobenzo-[6]helicene (-)-(M)-3 TMS

H2N

H2N

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI

Br

i-Pr2NH, 0 °C to rt 16 h 99%

Br I 7

TMS

I

BocHN

(HO) 2B

Br

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI i-Pr2NH, rt, 16 h 70%

OMOM (+)-(S)-26 TIPS

BocHN

(-)-(S)-19, >99% ee TIPS

10

TIPS

OMOM

Br

24

(1) (Boc)2O EtOH, rt, 16 h (2) K2CO3, CH3OH rt, 3 h, 89%

25

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, K2CO3 toluene, n-PrOH, H2O reflux, 5 h, 98% R

BocHN

Tol Ni(CO)2(PPh3)2

Tol BocHN

(-)-(M,S)-30

OMOM (-)-(S)-27 R=TIPS (-)-(S)-28 R=H

OMOM

toluene 150 °C, 10 min 84%, >99% de

R

n-Bu4NF, THF rt, 6 h, 93%

HCl dioxane rt, 19 h 83%

I

(+)-(S)-29 R=Tol

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI i-Pr2NH, rt, 16 h 93% H2N

Tol Tol

(-)-(M)-3 >99% ee, ]D20 -931

5



Page 6 of 35

We attempted also the stereoselective synthesis of the aminobenzo[6]helicene derivative 4 with one of its backbone carbocycles being contracted to a five-membered one (Scheme 4). We reasoned that such a structural change would shorten and simplify the synthesis of the chiral triyne rac-36 employing the synthetic methodologies successfully applied to the preparation of aminohelicenes 1–3 as described above. Although [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization of rac-36 catalyzed by CpCo(CO)2 in the microwave reactor delivered the desired aminohelicene derivative 4 in good yield, the modest stereochemical outcome of this reaction (dr = 1.7 : 1.0) disqualified this approach from its use in the asymmetric synthesis of enantiopure aminohelicenes. The failure of the stereocontrol by the 1,3allylic-type strain16 in this case can be explained by an insufficient energy difference between the "pseudo axial" and "pseudo equatorial" position of the methoxymethoxy group positioned at the fivemembered carbocycle (and interacting with the adjacent p-tolyl group) that drives the molecule to adopt the lowest energy conformation and, accordingly, its helicity. Aminohelicenes in Langmuir Monolayeres and Langmuir-Blodgett Films. As aminohelicenes are endowed with a hydrophilic amino group (capable of hydrogen bonding to water molecules) and large lipophilic polyaromatic backbone (prone to π-π stacking), we investigated their self-assembly at Scheme 4. The synthesis of 2-aminobenzo[6]helicene derivative 4 as a mixture of diastereomers Bn2N

TIPS

O

Bn2N

, n-BuLi

TIPS

THF, -78 °C, 30 min 95%

I 15

I

OR MOMCl, DMAP i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2 35 °C, 16 h, 78%

31 R=H 32 R=MOM 6

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI Br

i-Pr2NH, rt, 16 h 80%

TIPS

Bn2N

Bn2N

R (HO) 2B

OMOM

TIPS

10 OMOM

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, K2CO3

Br

toluene, n-PrOH, H2O reflux, 5 h, 88% 33

R rac-34 R=TIPS rac-35 R=H

n-Bu4NF, THF rt, 2 h, 74%

Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI I

i-Pr2NH, rt, 16 h 72%

Bn2N

OMOM Tol

Tol OMOM

CpCo(CO)2 microwave reactor Ionic liquid, THF 180 °C, 15 min 73%

rac-36

Tol

Tol Bn2N

4 A mixture of diastereomers dr = 1.7:1.0

6


Page 7 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


the air-water interface by means of the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technique. Actually, there is only a limited number of studies on Langmuir monolayers and LB films formed by helicenes even though such assemblies can exhibit remarkable chiroptical and NLO properties as explored by Katz et al. in the late ninethies21 and later followed by Siltanen et al.22 Helicene units studied in this context bore multiple long alkyl chains (four or six n-dodecyl ones) that are well known to support the Langmuir monolayer formation. On the contrary, Yamaguchi et al. incorporated the conformationally locked [4]helicene units into macrocycloamides to form optically active LB films based on helical chirality for the first time.23 Recently, the structure and photoelectrical properties of thin films of amphiphilic oxa[11]helicene equipped with a tetraethyleneglycoxy chain were studied by Iimura et al.24 In our case, however, none of the racemic/nonracemic aminohelicene derivatives 1-4 bore such long alkyl or oligoethyleneglycoxy substituents or was a part of a macrocycle. Instead, aminohelicenes 2-4 were equipped with two aromatic p-tolyl groups whose presence in the chiral triynes as helicene precursors (and in final aminohelicenes) was essential for an efficient stereocontrol of the key cyclization, vide supra, but not for self-assembly.25

Figure 2. The surface pressure vs. mean molecular area isotherms for 2-amino[6]helicenes rac-, (-)(M)-, and (+)-(P)-2 upon compression in LB trough (a). AFM tapping mode images of the LB films of rac-2 formed by LB trough and transferred on silicon chips at a surface pressure of (b) 9 or (c) 35 mN/m. 7



Page 8 of 35

Thus, we focused on self-assembly of rac-, (-)-(M)-, and (+)-(P)-2 using the LB trough. Regardless of the molecular chirality and absence of long alkyl chains, both the racemic and enantiopure 2 provided practically identical and reproducible surface pressure vs. mean molecular area isotherms (Figure 2). The liftoff in the isotherms took place at ca. 60 Å2/molecule, after which the surface pressure steeply increased to ca. 20 mN/m where a noticeable kink on the isotherm appeared (at ca. 50 Å2/molecule) indicating a phase transition. The surface pressure further increased less steeply to ca. 50 mN/m forming a moderate kink on the isotherm (at ca. 25 Å2/molecule). The calculated (Scigress, MO-G AM1) Van der Waals molecular footprint of 2 in the upright position (with H2N oriented toward the water surface and p-tolyls pointing out of that) is 72 Å2 (for the helicene core itself it is 63 Å2), in the face-on position of 2 (lying flat on the water surface) it is 137 Å2 (for the helicene core itself 99 Å2). We propose the initial less compressible phase (ca. 99% ee) and on a multigram scale (as demonstrated by the preparation of (+)and (-)-2 in 2 g quantities). The [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization of triynes with enantiopure key stereocenters, which was combined with the asymmetric transformation of the first kind controlled by the 1,3-allylic-type strain, was central to the stereoselective syntheses of 2 and 3. The latter mode of stereocontrol failed in the case of 2-amino[6]helicene derivative 4. The alternative approach to 2aminodibenzo[6]helicene rac-1 and its nonracemic derivative (+)-(P)-13 (67% ee) was efficient in terms of step economy and promising with respect to the helicity control by enantioselective [2 + 2 + 2] cycloisomerization. In a preliminary study,25 we studied Langmuir monolayers of helical aromatics rac-, (-)-(M)-, and (+)-(P)-2 without long alkyl chains at the air-water interface using the LangmuirBlodgett trough. The corresponding LB films on quartz or silicon plates were characterized by optical methods or AFM microscopy, respectively. 8


Page 9 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 3. (a) The UV-Vis spectrum (red line) and ECD spectrum (blue line) of (+)-(P)-2 (THF, c=9.46 × 10-5 M). (b) The solid state UV-Vis spectrum of (-)-(M)-2 (red line) and ECD spectra of (-)-(M)-2 (blue line) and (+)-(P)-2 (blue dotted line) in a thin layer (two Langmuir-Blodgett monolayers deposited successively on a quartz plate on both sides).

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION General Methods. Melting points were determined on Mikro-Heiztisch Polytherm A (Hund, Wetzlar) apparatus and are uncorrected. The 1H NMR spectra were measured at 300 MHz, 400 MHz, 500 MHz, and 600 MHz, the 13C NMR spectra at 75 MHz, 101 MHz, 126 MHz, and 151 MHz in CDCl3 or CD2Cl2 as indicated in 5 mm PFG probe. For standardization of 1H NMR spectra, the internal signal of TMS (δ 0.0, CDCl3) or residual signals of solvents (δ 5.32 for CHDCl2 or δ 7.26 for CHCl3) were used. In the case of 13C spectra, the residual signals of solvents (δ 77.16 for CDCl3, δ 54.00 for CD2Cl2) were used. The chemical shifts are given in δ-scale, the coupling constants J are given in Hz. For the complete assignment of both the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of key compounds, COSY, HSQC and HMBC experiments were performed. The IR spectra were measured in CHCl3 on FT-IR spectrometer Bruker Equinox 55 or neat on FT-IR spectrometer Nicolet 6700 with the ATR unit Smart Performer from Thermo Electron Corporation. The EI mass spectra were determined at an 9



Page 10 of 35

ionizing voltage of 70 eV, recorded in the positive ion mode, and the m/z values are given along with their relative intensities (%). The sample was dissolved in chloroform, loaded into a quartz cup of the direct probe and inserted into the ion source. The source temperature was 220 °C. For exact mass measurement, the spectrum was internally calibrated using perfluorotri-n-butylamine (Heptacosa). The ESI mass spectra were recorded using ZQ micromass mass spectrometer (Waters) equipped with an ESCi multi-mode ion source and controlled by MassLynx software. Alternatively, the low resolution ESI mass spectra were recorded using a quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer (Q-Tof micro, Waters) and high resolution ESI mass spectra using a hybrid FT mass spectrometer combining a linear ion trap MS and the Orbitrap mass analyzer (LTQ Orbitrap XL, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The conditions were optimized for suitable ionization in the ESI Orbitrap source (sheath gas flow rate 35 a.u., aux gas flow rate 10 a.u. of nitrogen, source voltage 4.3 kV, capillary voltage 40 V, capillary temperature 275 °C, tube lens voltage 155 V). The samples were dissolved in methanol and applied by direct injection. As a mobile phase was used 80% methanol (flow rate 100 µl/min. MALDI spectra were recorded using UltrafleXtreme™MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) operated in reflectron mode. Samples were prepared using dried droplet method with 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic matrix. Desorption and ionization was accomplished by a Smartbeam laser (Nd:YAG 355 nm) operated at 1 kHz with optimized delayed extraction time. Positive ions were accelerated by voltage of 25 kV. Data were collected by means of FlexControl software. The APCI mass spectra were recorded using an LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) hybrid mass spectrometer equipped with an APCI ion source. The APCI vaporizer and heated capillary temperatures were set to 400 °C and 200 °C, respectively; the corona discharge current was 3.5 μA. Nitrogen served both as the sheath and auxiliary gas at flow rate 55 and 5 arbitrary units, respectively. The ionization conditions were the same for low‐resolution as well as high‐ resolution experiment. The HR spectra were acquired at a resolution of 100 000. The CI mass spectra in the positive ion mode were recorded using an orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometer GCT Premier (Waters) coupled to a 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent). The ion source temperature 140 °C, the electron energy 70 eV and methane as the reagent gas were used. The spectra were internally calibrated using tris(trifluoromethyl)triazine. UV/Vis spectra were recorded on SPECORD 250 PLUS (Analytik Jena AG) with pure solvent (CHCl3 for HPLC) as a baseline. Optical rotations were measured in CHCl3 using an Autopol IV instrument (Rudolph Research Analytical). The CD spectra were acquired on a J‐815 CD spectrometer (Jasco Analytical Instruments, Inc.) in THF (10‐4 M solutions) using 10 mm quartz sample cell. TLC was performed on Silica gel 60 F254‐ coated aluminium sheets (Merck) and spots were detected by an aqueous solution of Ce(SO4)2 ∙ 4 H2O (1%) and H3P(Mo3O10)4 (2%) in sulphuric acid (10%). The flash chromatography was performed on Silica gel 60 (0.040‐0.063 mm, Merck) or on Biotage® KP‐ C18‐HS SNAP cartridges using Isolera One HPFC system (Biotage, Inc.). Biotage Initiator EXP EU (300 W power) was used for reactions carried out in microwave reactor. Microwave reactions were performed in sealed reaction vessels 10


Page 11 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(containing a pressure relief septum). The temperature was monitored using an external built-in infrared sensor. N,N‐Diisopropylamine was distilled from calcium hydride under nitrogen; THF was distilled from sodium/benzophenone under nitrogen; toluene was distilled from sodium under nitrogen, and dichloromethane was distilled from phosphorous pentoxide under nitrogen. N,NDimethylformamide was taken from Sure/Seal™ bottles with molecular sieves (purchased from Sigma Aldrich). Otherwise, all commercially available solvents, catalysts and reagent grade materials were used as received. The starting material 7 was purchased and the materials 5,17 10,17 14,19 and (-)-(S)1916b were synthesized according to the literature procedures. Synthesis of 2-Aminodibenzo[6]helicenes rac-1, rac-13, and (+)-(P)-13. 2-Bromo-1ethynylnaphthalene (6). A Schlenk flask was charged with iodonaphthalene 517 (2.997 g, Br

9.00 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (300 mg, 0.450 mmol, 5 mol%), and CuI (171 mg, 0.90 mmol, 10 mol%), then dissolved in diisopropylamine (14 mL) and degassed by three freeze-

pump-thaw cycles. (Triisopropylsilyl)acetylene (2.12 mL, 9.45 mmol, 1.05 equiv.) was added and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 18 h. Afterward, the mixture was filtered through a small pad of silica gel and eluted with dichloromethane (50 mL). The solvents were removed in vacuo and a solution of n-tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (4.706 g, 18.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) in tetrahydrofuran (12 mL) and methanol (1.0 mL) was added into the flask. After stirring at room temperature for 4 h, the reaction mixture was filtered through a small pad of silica gel (dichloromethane) and solvents were removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane) to afford bromo alkyne 6 (1.528 g, 74%, after 2 steps) as a brownish solid. Mp 57–59 °C (hexane). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.36 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (ddd, J = 8.3, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (ddd, J = 8.1, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 134.9, 131.7, 130.1, 129.6, 128.4, 128.1, 126.9, 126.3, 125.3, 121.4, 87.2, 80.4. IR (CHCl3): 3304 s, 3061 w, 2106 vw, 1619 w, 1579 m, 1568 w, 1560 w, 1501 m, 1450 w, 1427 w, 1375 w, 1317 w, 1265 m, 1121 m, 1041 m, 654 vs, 624 m, 616 m, 564 m, 435 w cm-1. ESI MS: 230 ([M]+, with 79Br). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M]+ Calcd for C12H779Br 229.9731; Found 229.9737. Di-tert-butyl (4-bromo-3-iodophenyl)imidodicarbonate (8). Iodoaniline 7 (5.065 g, 17.0 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (100 mL). Subsequently di-tert-butyl dicarbonate

(Boc) 2N Br I

(14.841 g, 68.0 mmol, 4.0 equiv.) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (208 mg, 1.70 mmol, 10 mol%) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred under reflux for 2 h.

After cooling down to room temperature, the reaction was quenched by the addition of brine (100 mL). The phases were separated and an aqueous layer extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 150 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 4:1) affording aniline derivative 8 (8.048 g, 95%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 11



Page 12 of 35

δ 7.65 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 1.43 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.3, 139.8, 138.9, 132.5, 129.3, 128.7, 100.3, 83.6, 28.1. IR (CHCl3): 2984 m, 2873 w, 1830 w, 1810 m, 1788 s, 1748 vs, 1709 s, 1578 w, 1558 s, 1476 w, 1458 s, 1395 m, 1372 vs, 1362 m, 1307 s, 1279 s, 1252 s, 1149 vs, 1120 vs, 1104 s, 1078 s, 949 w, 875 m, 844 m, 816 w, 436 w cm–1. ESI MS: 520 ([M+Na]+, with 79Br). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C16H21O4N79BrINa 519.9591; Found 519.9592. Di-tert-butyl {4-bromo-3-[(2-bromonaphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl]phenyl}imido-dicarbonate (9). A Schlenk flask was charged with aniline derivative 8 (214 mg, 0.430 mmol, 1.0 equiv.),

(Boc) 2N Br

Br

alkyne 6 (99 mg, 0.430 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (14 mg, 2.022 mmol, 5 mol%), and CuI (8 mg, 4.43 mmol, 10 mol%). Diisopropylamine (1 mL) was degassed in a separate Schlenk flask by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles and then added to the first Schlenk flask via a syringe. The mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 h.

Afterward, it was filtered through a short pad of silica gel and eluted with dichloromethane. The solvents were removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 9:1) affording dibromo derivative 9 (250 mg, 97%) as a beige solid. Mp 158–161 °C (hexane-ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.57 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.70–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.58–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.05 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 1.47 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.4, 138.7, 134.6, 133.2, 133.0, 131.8, 130.1, 129.8, 129.7, 128.4, 128.1, 126.9, 126.6, 126.1, 125.3, 124.2, 122.0, 96.9, 91.5, 83.5, 28.1. IR (CHCl3): 3060 w, 3029 w, 2984 m, 1790 s, 1779 s, 1749 s, 1721 m, 1706 m, 1591 w, 1578 w, 1567 w, 1501 w, 1471 s, 1452 m, 1395 m, 1371 vs, 1363 m, 1318 m, 1277 s, 1253 s, 1246 s, 1167 s, 1152 vs, 1119 vs, 1104 vs, 1031 m, 906 w, 869 w, 836 w, 812 m, 650 w, 613 w, 609 w, 462 w, 435 w cm–1. ESI MS: 624 ([M+Na]+, with 79Br81Br). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C28H27O4N79Br2Na 622.0199; Found 622.0201. Di-tert-butyl (2'-{[tris(1-methylethyl)silyl]ethynyl}-2-{[2-(2-{[tris(1-methyl-ethyl)-silyl]ethynyl}phenyl)naphthalen-1-yl]ethynyl}biphenyl-4-yl)imido-dicarbonate (11). A TIPS N(Boc) 2

250 mL-flask was charged with K2CO3 (788 mg, 5.70 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), dibromide 9 (1.714 g, 2.85 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (152 mg, 0.230 mmol, 8 mol%), and boronic acid 1017 (2.240 g, 7.41 mmol, 2.6 equiv.). Then a solvent mixture of toluene (50 mL), n-propanol (50 mL), and water (12 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was

TIPS

refluxed for 6 h. Then the reaction was quenched with brine (100 mL), the phases were separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 100 mL),

and the combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4. The solvents were removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexaneethyl acetate 10:1), affording the disilylated compound 11 (2.357 g, 87%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.77 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 12


Page 13 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


7.65–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51–7.33 (m, 7H), 7.29 (ddd, J = 8.3, 6.9, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 1.46 (s, 18H), 0.99– 0.94 (m, 21H), 0.82–0.77 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.8, 144.1, 142.3, 142.0, 141.2, 138.3, 134.0, 133.6, 132.9, 132.5, 132.0, 130.9, 130.7, 130.5, 128.2, 128.0, 127.8, 127.7 (2 C), 127.5, 127.4, 127.20, 127.16, 126.5, 126.2, 123.7, 123.4, 123.0, 120.0, 106.1, 106.0, 96.7, 94.7, 94.3, 90.7, 82.9, 28.1, 18.8, 18.5, 11.4, 11.3. IR (CHCl3): 3059 w, 2984 m, 2959 s, 2944 vs, 2891 m, 2865 vs, 2155 w, 1793 m, 1778 vs, 1745 s, 1721 m, 1707 m, 1602 w, 1594 w, 1558 w, 1502 w, 1485 w, 1471 s, 1463 m, 1457 m, 1442 w, 1394 m, 1370 s, 1360 m, 1318 m, 1300 m, 1279 s, 1253 s, 1174 m, 1152 vs, 1118 s, 1106 vs, 1075 w, 1035 w, 997 w, 950 w, 909 w, 883 m, 867 w, 818 m, 702 w, 679 m, 662 m, 638 m, 624 w, 613 w, 499 w, 463 w cm–1. ESI MS: 978 ([M+Na]+). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C62H77O4NNaSi2 978.5283; Found 978.5285. Di-tert-butyl (2'-ethynyl-2-{[2-(2-ethynylphenyl)naphthalen-1-yl]ethynyl}-biphenyl-4N(Boc) 2

yl)imidodicarbonate (12). To a solution of the silylated triyne 11 (2.094 g, 2.19 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (25 mL), a solution of n-tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (3.596 g, 11.4 mmol, 4.0 equiv.) in methanol (3 mL) and tetrahydrofuran (30 mL) was added. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was then quenched with brine (10 mL) and extracted with

ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL) and diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and the solvents were removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1 to 4:1) to give triyne 12 (1.397 g, 76%) as a white solid. Mp 170–172 °C (hexane-ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.83–7.77 (m, 2H), 7.72–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.52–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.48–7.42 (m, 5H), 7.42–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (ddd, J = 8.3, 6.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 2.89 (s, 1H), 2.86 (s, 1H), 1.48–1.43 (m, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.6, 144.0, 143.5, 141.49, 141.47, 138.8, 133.5, 133.3 (2 C), 132.4, 131.5, 131.0, 130.33, 130.32, 128.8, 128.2, 128.0 (2 C), 127.74, 127.67, 127.6, 127.4, 127.0, 126.8, 126.4, 123.8, 121.9, 121.8, 119.7, 96.5, 90.6, 83.0, 82.9, 82.5, 80.57, 80.55, 28.1. IR (CHCl3): 3309 m, 3298 m, 3059 w, 2982 m, 2933 w, 2871 w, 2107 vw, 1795 s, 1779 vs, 1747 s, 1721 m, 1707 m, 1603 w, 1595 w, 1559 w, 1503 w, 1485 w, 1471 m, 1457 w, 1441 w, 1395 m, 1370 s, 1361 m, 1321 m, 1297 m, 1280 s, 1253 s, 1175 m, 1159 vs, 1119 s, 1106 vs, 1082 w, 1035 w, 1005 w, 951 w, 909 w, 865 w, 825 m, 810 w, 682 w, 659 m, 648 m, 623 m, 615 m, 613 m cm–1. ESI MS: 666 ([M+Na]+). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C44H37O4NNa 666.2615; Found 666.2616.

13



Page 14 of 35

rac-Di-tert-butyl Dibenzo[f,l]hexahelicen-12-ylimidodicarbonate (13). A Schlenk flask equipped with a stirring bar was charged with Ni(cod)2 (44 mg, 0.160 mmol, 20 mol%) and PPh3 (84 mg, 0.320 mmol, 40 mol%) in a glove box. The Schlenk flask was taken (Boc) 2N

out of the glove box, tetrahydrofuran (24 mL) was added, and stirred for 5 min to obtain a dark red solution. Then another Schlenk flask was charged with a solution of triyne 12 (515 mg, 0.800 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (16 mL). This solution was

transferred to the first Schlenk flask with the Ni-catalyst solution and stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Then the resulting solution was filtered through a small pad of silica gel and eluted with dichloromethane. The solvents were removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) affording dibenzohelicene derivative rac-13 (443 mg, 86%) as a yellow amorphous solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.84 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.81–8.72 (m, 4H), 8.72–8.63 (m, 2H), 8.42 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.83–7.69 (m, 5H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.22 (m, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 1.26 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.7, 136.8, 132.4, 131.5, 130.9, 130.6, 130.3, 130.02, 129.98, 129.8, 129.5, 129.0, 128.9, 128.3, 128.0, 127.94, 127.90, 127.7, 127.50, 127.48, 127.46, 127.42, 127.36, 126.6, 126.0, 125.8, 124.1, 124.02, 123.95, 123.7, 123.6, 123.5, 122.0, 121.4, 120.8, 82.5, 27.9. IR (CHCl3): 3081 w, 3061 w, 2982 m, 2872 w, 1777 m, 1741 vs, 1722 s, 1704 m, 1614 w, 1503 w, 1485 w, 1477 w, 1464 m, 1457 m, 1453 m, 1405 w, 1394, 1369 vs, 1363 s, 1337 m, 1314 m, 1279 s, 1252 s, 1154 s, 1119 s, 1108 s, 1050 w, 1043 w, 1005 w, 857 m, 823 w, 811 w, 805 w, 601 w, 486 w cm–1. ESI MS: 666 ([M+Na]+). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C44H37O4NNa 666.2615; Found 666.2615. Enantioenriched (+)-(P)-Di-tert-butyl Dibenzo[f,l]hexahelicen-12-ylimido-dicarbonate (13). A Schlenk flask equipped with a stirring bar was charged with Ni(cod)2 (0.9 mg, 3.1 (Boc) 2N

µmol, 20 mol%), (R)-QUINAP (2.7 mg, 6.1 µmol, 40 mol%), and tetrahydrofuran (0.7 mL) in a glove box to afford a dark red solution. Then another Schlenk flask was charged with a solution of triyne 12 (10 mg, 15.5 µmol) in tetrahydrofuran (0.3 mL). This solution was transferred dropwise to the Schlenk flask with the

catalyst at -20 °C. The resulting reaction mixture was then allowed to warm up to 0 °C and stirred at this temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 4:1) to furnish the cyclic product (+)-(P)-13 (9 mg, 90%, >67% ee) as a yellowish amorphous solid. Chiral HPLC: Chiralpak IA column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Chiral Technologies), mobile phase: n-heptane-dichloromethane (75:25), flow rate: 1 mL/min, retention times: tR(P) = 5.52 min, tR(M) = 6.97 min.

14


Page 15 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


rac-Dibenzo[f,l]hexahelicen-12-amine (1). Helicene rac-13 (534 mg, 0.830 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (50 mL), trifluoroacetic acid (1 mL, 13.33 mmol, 16.1 equiv.) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 18 h. Then the reaction

H2N

mixture was quenched with a saturated NaHCO3 solution (30 mL). The phases were separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 50 mL), the combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and the solvent was

removed under reduced pressure to give dibenzohelicene rac-1 (364 mg, 99%) as a yellow solid. Mp 235–239 °C (dichloromethane). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.88–8.68 (m, 6H), 8.57–8.52 (m, 1H), 8.22 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.81–7.73 (m, 3H), 7.71–7.62 (m, 3H), 7.23 (ddd, J = 7.9, 6.7, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.6, 131.9, 131.6, 131.0, 130.5, 130.4, 130.1, 129.9, 129.3, 129.1, 128.4, 128.0, 127.7, 127.61, 127.57, 127.3, 127.2, 127.2, 126.9, 125.9, 125.7, 125.2, 124.2, 124.1, 123.8, 123.39, 123.37, 122.5, 122.0, 121.9, 121.0, 120.7, 115.7, 113.7. IR (CHCl3): 3482 w, 3443 w, 3398 w, 1622 vs, 1588 w, 1566 w, 1543, w, 1506 m, 1416 w, 1248 m, 1236 m, 1077 w, 1044 m, 1027 w, 879 w, 853 w, 809 s cm–1. ESI MS: 444 ([M+H]+). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C34H22N 444.1747; Found 444.1746. UV/Vis (tetrahydrofuran): λmax (log ε) 213 (4.73), 232 (4.67), 248 (4.67), 268 (4.88), 293 (4.90), 317 nm (2.50). Fluorescence (tetrahydrofuran, λexc = 290 nm): λmax = 490 nm. Synthesis of 2-Amino[6]helicenes (-)-(M)-2 and (-)-(M)-23. 4-(Dibenzylamino)-2iodobenzaldehyde (15).26 An oven-dried Schlenk flask was charged with

Bn2N O I

dimethylformamide (5 mL, 65.0 mmol, 5.0 equiv.), cooled to 0 °C, and phosphoryl chloride (7.876 mL, 84.5 mmol, 6.5 equiv.) was slowly added. The reaction was

warmed to room temperature, stirred at this temperature for 1 h, and then cooled again to 0 °C. To this mixture, N,N-dibenzyl-3-iodoaniline 1419 (5.190 g, 13.0 mmol) was slowly added as a suspension in dimethylformamide (10 mL). After stirring at 0 °C for 1 h, the reaction was stirred at 50 °C for additional 5 h. The cooled solution was poured into ice water, basified with a NaOH solution (3 N), extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL), dichloromethane (3 × 20 mL), the organic phases were combined, and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-methyl tert-butyl ether 10:1 to 2:1 to 0:1) to afford benzaldehyde 15 (5.278 g, 95%) as a white solid. Mp 106–108 °C (hexane-methyl tert-butyl ether). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.79 (s, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.28 (m, 6H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 6.77 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.1, 154.2, 136.3, 131.6, 129.1, 127.7, 126.5, 124.7, 122.5, 112.1, 104.4, 54.0. IR (neat): 3084 vw, 3050 vw, 3017 vw, 2942 w, 2830 w, 2733 vw, 1660 m, 1575 s, 1503 m, 1449 s, 1401 w, 1359 w, 1230 s, 1013 m, 728 s, 694 m cm-1. EI MS: 427 (M+•, 15), 336 (7), 180 (4), 91 (100), 65 (15). HRMS (EI) m/z: [M+•] Calcd for C21H18ONI 427.0433; Found 427.0441.

15



Page 16 of 35

rac-1-[4-(Dibenzylamino)-2-iodophenyl]-4-[tris(1-methylethyl)silyl]but-3-yn-1-ol (16). A solution of n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 6.3 mL, 15.75 mmol, 1.05 equiv.) was

Bn2N

added dropwise at -78 °C under argon to a solution of I

OH

TIPS

(triisopropylsilyl)propyne (3.77 mL, 15.75 mmol, 1.05 equiv.) in

tetrahydrofuran (18 mL). After stirring at -78 °C for 10 min, the cooling bath was removed and the reaction mixture was stirred for additional 40 min reaching room temperature. Then the mixture was cooled again to -78 °C and a solution of benzaldehyde 15 (6.41 g, 15.0 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (15 mL) was added. The reaction was stirred at -78 °C for 20 min. After completion (checked by TLC), it was quenched with an HCl solution (1 M). The layers were separated and the aqueous one was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with a saturated NaHCO3 solution (50 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to afford the alkynol rac-16 (8.997 g, 96%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.37–7.31 (m, 4H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 5H), 6.73 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (ddd, J = 7.2, 5.0, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 4H), 2.82 (dd, J = 16.8, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.60 (dd, J = 16.9, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.10–0.98 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.8, 137.9, 132.0, 128.9, 127.4, 127.3, 126.8, 122.3, 112.8, 104.4, 99.4, 84.1, 75.2, 54.0, 29.6, 18.8, 11.4. IR (neat): 3089 vw, 3064 vw, 3030 w, 2922 m, 2863 m, 1598 s, 1502 m, 1453 m, 1228 w, 1015 w, 731 w, 677 w cm-1. EI MS: 623 (M+•, 22), 428 (44), 181 (9), 91 (100), 75 (11), 43 (11). HRMS (EI) m/z: [M+•] Calcd for C33H42ONISi 623.2080; Found 623.2096. rac-N,N-Dibenzyl-3-iodo-4-{1-(methoxymethoxy)-4-[tris(1-methylethyl)silyl]but-3-yn-1-yl}-aniline (17). A Schlenk flask was charged with a solution of alkynol rac-16 (5.831 g,

Bn2N

I

OMOM

TIPS

9.35 mmol) in dichloromethane (65 mL) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (114 mg, 0.940 mmol, 10 mol%), i-Pr2NEt (2.28 mL, 13.09 mmol, 1.4 equiv.), and

chloromethyl methyl ether (1.0 mL, 14.0 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) were subsequently added, the flask was closed with a glass stopper and a solution was stirred at 35 °C for 16 h. Afterward, the reaction was quenched with a saturated NaHCO3 solution (30 mL), the layers were separated, and the aqueous one was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give MOM-ether rac-17 (5.682 g, 93%) as a white solid. Mp 89–91 °C (hexane-ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.36–7.30 (m, 4H), 7.26 (s, 2H), 7.23–7.16 (m, 6H), 6.71 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.60–4.57 (m, 6H), 3.39 (s, 3H), 2.80–2.63 (m, 2H), 1.03–0.98 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.7, 137.8, 130.8, 128.9, 128.2, 127.3, 126.9, 122.4, 113.1, 104.8, 100.5, 94.8, 82.3, 79.4, 55.9, 54.1, 28.2, 18.8, 11.4. IR (neat): 3087 vw, 3063 vw, 3027 vw, 2940 m, 2864 m, 1462 w, 1149 m, 1097 m, 1026 s, 919 w, 882 m, 809 m, 753 w, 677 m cm-1. EI MS: 667 (M+•, 1), 472 (9), 412 (7), 145 (7), 117 (7), 91 16


Page 17 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(100), 71 (11), 57 (11), 45 (2). HRMS (EI) m/z: [M+•] Calcd for C35H46O2NISi 667.2337; Found 667.2387. rac-N,N-Dibenzyl-3-ethynyl-4-{1-(methoxymethoxy)-4-[tris(1-methylethyl)silyl]but-3-yn-1-yl}aniline (18). A Schlenk flask was charged with iodide rac-17 (668 mg, 1.00

Bn2N

OMOM

TIPS

mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (14.0 mg, 0.020 mmol, 2 mol%), CuI (8.0 mg, 0.040 mmol, 4 mol%), and flushed with nitrogen. Then diisopropylamine (10 mL)

was added and the mixture was degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles. (Trimethylsilyl)acetylene (170 µL, 1.20 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) was added via a syringe and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo, the crude trimethylsilyl alkyne was filtered through a small pad of silica gel (ethyl acetate), and evaporated to dryness. Then the protected alkyne was dissolved in methanol (6 mL) and K2CO3 (207 mg, 1.50 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the reaction was quenched with a saturated NH4Cl solution (10 mL), the layers were separated, and the aqueous one extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude product purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-methyl tert-butyl ether 10:1) to furnish alkyne rac-18 (549 mg, 97%, after 2 steps) as a yellow solid. Mp 103–105 °C (hexane methyl tert-butyl ether). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.37–7.27 (m, 6H), 7.25–7.19 (m, 5H), 6.86 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.64–4.58 (m, 6H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 3.18 (s, 1H), 2.88–2.69 (m, 2H), 1.03–0.97 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 148.5, 138.2, 131.2, 128.8, 127.7, 127.2, 126.8, 121.8, 115.8, 113.6, 105.2, 94.9, 82.2, 82.0, 81.1, 74.2, 55.8, 54.0, 28.2, 18.7, 11.4. IR (neat): 3284 w, 2936 m, 2860 m, 2174 w, 1602 s, 1452 m, 1357 m, 1234 m, 1149 m, 1096 m, 1030 vs, 962 m, 882 m, 732 s, 696 s, 660 vs cm–1. EI MS: 565 (M+•, 44), 370 (100), 310 (9), 280 (2), 248 (2), 155 (3), 91 (44), 71 (9), 57 (15). HRMS (EI) m/z: [M+•] Calcd for C37H47O2NSi 565.3371; Found 565.3370. (-)-N,N-Dibenzyl-4-[(1RS)-(methoxymethoxy)but-3-yn-1-yl]-3-({2-[(2S)-2-(methoxy-methoxy)-but3-yn-1-yl]naphthalen-1-yl}ethynyl)aniline (20). A Schlenk flask was charged with iodide (-)-(S)-1916b (1.229 g, 2.352 mmol, 0.83 equiv.), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (33.0 mg, 0.047 mmol, 2 mol%), CuI (18 mg, 0.094 mmol, 3 mol%), and flushed with argon. Then diisopropylamine (25 mL, degassed by the three freeze-pumpthaw cycles) was added via cannula. Another Schlenk flask was charged with diyne rac-18 (1.597 g, 2.822 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), flushed with argon, and diisopropylamine (25 mL, degassed by the three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via cannula. Then a diyne solution was added dropwise via cannula to the iodide solution over 10 min and the resulted mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo, the crude intermediate was filtered through a small pad of silica gel (ethyl acetate), and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 17



Page 18 of 35

tetrahydrofuran (30 mL) and a solution of n-tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (1 M in tetrahydrofuran, 7 mL, 7.056 mmol, 2.5 equiv.) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h and then quenched with methanol (10 mL). The solvents were removed in vacuo, the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to afford triyne (-)-(RS,S)-20 (1.412g, 77%, after 2 steps) as a yellow oil. The product was obtained as a diastereomeric mixture. Optical rotation: [α]20D -43° (c 0.168, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) (a mixture of diastereoisomers): δ 8.43 (d, 2H, J8,7 = 8.1, H-8-Naphth), 7.82 (dd, 2H, J5,6 = 8.1, J5,7 = 1.3, H-5-Naphth), 7.76 (d, 2H, J4,3 = 8.5, H-4-Naphth), 7.564, 7.556 (2 × ddd, 2 × 1H, J7,8 = 8.1, J7,6 = 6.8, J7,5 = 1.3, H-7-Naphth), 7.49 (ddd, 2H, J6,5 = 8.1, J6,7 = 6.8, J6,8 = 1.3, H-6-Naphth), 7.48 (d, 2H, J3,4 = 8.5, H-3-Naphth), 7.38–7.32 (m, 10H, H-3-Ph, H-m-Bn), 7.29–7.26 (m, 12H, H-o,p-Bn), 7.083, 7.077 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, J6,4 = 2.8, H-6-Ph), 6.77, 6.76 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, J4,3 = 8.8, J4,5 = 2.8, H-4-Ph), 5.49, 5.48 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, 3J = 6.9, 4.8, CHCH2C≡CH), 4.78 (d, 2H, 2J = 6.9, OCHaHbO), 4.76, 4.75 (2 × ddd, 2 × 1H, 3J = 8.4, 5.7, 4J = 2.1, CH2CHOC≡CH), 4.45 (d, 2H, 2J = 6.9, OCHaHbO); 4.70–4.64 (m, 12H, OCH2O, CH2Ph), 3.53, 3.52 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, 2J = 13.5, 3J = 5.7, CHaHbCHOC≡CH), 3.46, 3.45 (2 × s, 2 × 3H, CH3O), 3.44, 3.43 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, 2J = 13.5, 3J = 8.4, CHaHbCHOC≡CH), 2.95, 2.94 (2 × s, 2 × 3H, CH3O), 2.84, 2.83 (2 × ddd, 2 × 1H, 2J = 16.9, 3J = 4.8, 4J = 2.6, CHaHbC≡CH), 2.76, 2.75 (2 × ddd, 2 × 1H, 2J = 16.9, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.6, CHaHbC≡CH), 2.25, 2.21 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, 4J = 2.1, HC≡CCH), 2.06, 2.04 (2 × t, 2 × 1H, 4J = 2.6, HC≡CCH2). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) (a mixture of diastereoisomers): δ 148.57, 148.55 (C-5-Ph), 138.13 (C-i-Bn), 138.12, 138.06 (C-2-Naphth), 133.44, 133.43 (C-8a-Naphth), 132.0 (C-4a-Naphth), 129.77, 129.75 (C-2-Ph), 128.7 (CH-m-Bn), 128.55, 128.53 (CH-3-Naphth), 128.00, 127.98 (CH-4,5-Naphth), 127.3, 127.1 (CH-p-Bn), 126.86, 126.84 (CH-3-Ph), 126.71, 126.70 (CH-7-Naphth, CH-o-Bn), 126.4 (CH-8-Naphth), 126.0 (CH-6-Naphth), 122.83, 122.79 (C-1-Ph), 120.2 (C-1-Naphth), 115.3 (CH-6-Ph), 113.3 (CH-4-Ph), 97.2 (Naphth-C≡CPh), 94.24, 94.19, 94.02, 93.99 (OCH2O), 89.8, 89.7 (Naphth-C≡C-Ph), 82.3 (HC≡CCH), 81.6, 81.5 (HC≡CCH2), 74.01, 73.99 (HC≡CCH), 73.5, 73.4 (CHCH2C≡CH), 69.82, 69.77 (HC≡CCH2), 65.56, 65.54 (CH2CHOC≡CH), 55.7, 55.24, 55.21 (CH3O), 53.91, 53.86 (CH2Ph), 41.5 (CH2CHOC≡CH), 27.4 (CH2C≡CH).. IR (neat): 3288 w, 3059 vw, 2928 w, 1599 m, 1504 m, 1449 w, 1360 w, 1204 w, 1148 m, 1097 m, 1019 s, 963 m, 913 m, 810 m, 731 s, 696 m, 646 m, 564 w, 450 w cm–1. EI MS: 647 (M+•, 13), 608 (44), 575 (4), 532 (18), 502 (11), 441 (13), 364 (7), 308 (9), 289 (38), 276 (27), 267 (20), 239 (40), 211 (16), 199 (44), 191 (24), 155 (16), 141 (16), 127 (15), 99 (20), 91 (100), 84 (31), 71 (16), 57 (18), 45 (47). HRMS (EI) m/z: [M+•] Calcd for C44H41O4N 647.3036; Found 647.3038.

18


Page 19 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(+)-N,N-Dibenzyl-4-[(1RS)-(methoxymethoxy)-4-(4-methylphenyl)but-3-yn-1-yl]-3-({2-[(2S)-2(methoxymethoxy)-4-(4-methylphenyl)but-3-yn-1-yl]naphthalen-1yl}ethynyl)aniline (21). 4-Iodotoluene (1.413 g, 6.483 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (76.0 mg, 0.108 mmol, 5 mol%), and CuI (41.0 mg, 0.216 mmol, 10 mol%) were placed in a Schlenk flask and flushed with argon. Diisopropylamine (25 mL, degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via cannula and a mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. Another Schlenk flask was charged with triyne (-)-(RS,S)-20 (1.4 g, 2.16 mmol), flushed with argon, and diisopropylamine (25 mL, degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via cannula. Then the triyne solution was added dropwise to the mixture of 4-iodotoluene and catalyst via cannula over 10 min. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo, the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 5:1). The desired triyne (+)-(RS,S)-21 (1.675 g, 94%) was obtained as a white solid. The product was obtained as a diastereomeric mixture. Mp 75–77 °C (hexane-methyl tert-butyl ether). Optical rotation: [α]20D = +18° (c 0.264, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) (a mixture of diastereoisomers): δ 8.46 (d, 2H, J8,7 = 8.1, H-8-Naphth), 7.81 (dd, 2H, J5,6 = 8.1, J5,7 = 1.3, H-5Naphth), 7.76 (d, 2H, J4,3 = 8.5, H-4-Naphth), 7.54 (d, 2H, J3,4 = 8.5, H-3-Naphth),7.49 (ddd, 2H, J7,8 = 8.1, J7,6 = 6.8, J7,5 = 1.3, H-7-Naphth), 7.446, 7.444 (2 × ddd, 2 × 1H, J6,5 = 8.1, J6,7 = 6.8, J6,8 = 1.3, H6-Naphth), 7.381, 7.377 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, J3,4 = 8.8, H-3-Ph), 7.35–7.31 (m, 8H, H-m-Bn), 7.29–7.19 (m, 20H, H-o-Tol, H-o,p-Bn), 7.10 (d, 2H, J6,4 = 2.8, H-6-Ph), 7.06–6.99 (m, 8H, H-m-Tol), 6.76 (dd, 2H, J4,3 = 8.8, J4,5 = 2.8, H-4-Ph), 5.55 (dd, 2H, 3J = 8.0, 4.7, CHCH2C≡CTol), 4.98, 4.96 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, 3

J = 8.0, 6.0, CH2CHOC≡CTol), 4.85, 4.84 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, 2J = 6.9, OCHaHbO), 4.72–4.62 (m, 12H,

OCH2O, CH2Ph), 4.51, 4.49 (2 × d, 2H, 2J = 6.9, OCHaHbO), 3.60 (dd, 2H, 2J = 13.3, 3J = 8.0, CHaHbCHOC≡CTol), 3.56, 3.55 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, 2J = 13.3, 3J = 6.0, CHaHbCHOC≡CTol), 3.45 (s, 6H, CH3O), 3.01, 3.02 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, 2J = 17.0, 3J = 4.7, CHaHbC≡CTol), 3.00, 2.98 (2 × s, 2 × 3H, CH3O), 2.94 (dd, 2H, 2J = 17.0, 3J = 8.0, CHaHbC≡CTol), 2.310, 2.306 (2 × s, 12H, CH3-Tol). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) (a mixture of diastereoisomers): δ 148.37, 148.36 (C-5-Ph), 138.34 (C-pTol), 138.27 (C-2-Naphth), 138.2 (C-i-Bn), 137.40, 137.38 (C-p-Tol), 133.47, 133.46 (C-8a-Naphth), 132.0 (C-4a-Naphth), 131.64, 131.63, 131.4 (CH-o-Tol), 130.1 (C-2-Ph), 128.9, 128.82, 128.81 (CHm-Tol), 128.72 (CH-3-Naphth), 128.66 (CH-m-Bn), 127.93 (CH-5-Naphth), 127.87 (CH-4-Naphth), 127.28, 127.27 (CH-3-Ph), 127.0 (CH-p-Bn), 126.9 (CH-7-Naphth), 126.7 (CH-o-Bn), 126.5 (CH-8Naphth), 125.9 (CH-6-Naphth), 122.9, 122.8 (C-1-Ph), 120.81, 120.80 (C-i-Tol), 120.33, 120.28 (C-1Naphth), 119.52 (C-i-Tol), 115.49 (CH-6-Ph), 113.3 (CH-4-Ph), 97.14, 97.10 (Naphth-C≡C-Ph), 94.3, 94.2, 94.1 (OCH2O), 89.9, 89.8 (Naphth-C≡C-Ph), 87.0 (TolC≡CCH), 86.58, 86.57 (TolC≡CCH2), 86.16, 86.13 (TolC≡CCH), 81.93, 81.89 (TolC≡CCH2), 74.0, 73.9 (CHCH2C≡CTol), 66.41, 66.40 (CH2CHOC≡CTol), 55.63, 55.61, 55.22, 55.20 (CH3O), 54.0 (CH2Ph), 41.7, 41.6 (CH2CHOC≡CTol), 19



Page 20 of 35

28.48, 28.45 (CH2C≡CTol), 21.5, 21.4 (CH3-Tol). IR (CHCl3): 3061 w, 3031 w, 2825 w, 2226 w, 1601 m, 1568 w, 1557 w, 1510 s, 1495 m, 1471 w, 1466 w, 1453 m, 1298 w, 1180 w, 1150 m, 1118 w, 1099 m, 1060 m, 1028 s, 1022 m, 954 w, 866 w, 819 m, 697 m, 543 w, 459 w cm–1. ESI MS: 829 ([M+H]+). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C58H54NO4 828.4047; Found 828.4048. (-)-(M,5RS,9S)-N,N-Dibenzyl-5,9-bis(methoxymethoxy)-7,8-bis(4-methylphenyl)-5,6,9,10tetrahydrohexahelicen-2-amine (22). A microwave vial was charged with triyne (+)-(RS,S)-21 (166 mg, 0.200 mmol), Ni(CO)2(PPh3)2 (140 mg, 0.220 mmol, 1.1 equiv.), closed with a crimp seal, and flushed with argon. Toluene (20 mL) was added and argon was kept to bubble through the stirring mixture for 10 min. Then it was immersed in an oil bath and stirred at 150 °C for 15 min. The reaction mixture was cooled down, the solvent removed in vacuo, and the crude product purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give the tetrahydrohelicene (-)-(M,RS,S)-22 (136 mg, 82%) as a yellow solid. The product was obtained as a diastereomeric mixture. Mp 98–101 °C (hexane-ethyl acetate). Optical rotation: [α]20D = -183° (c 0.360, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.89 (d, 1H, J10,9 = 8.6, H-10), 7.80–7.75 (m, 4H, H-5,7), 7.68 (dd, 1H, J10,9 = 8.6, J10,8 = 1.2, H-10), 7.546, 7.544 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, J4,5 = 8.1, H-4), 7.34, 7.33 (2 ×ddd, 2 × 1H, J8,7 = 8.1, J8,9 = 6.8, J8,10 = 1.2, H-8), 7.27–7.15 (m, 15H, H-19-B, H-o-Tol, H-m,p-Bn), 7.07–6.84, 6.80–6.73 (m, 25H, H-9, H-19-A, H-o-Bn, H-o,m-Tol), 6.23 (dd, 1H, J18,19 = 8.5, J18,16 = 2.7, H-18-B), 6.15 (dd, 1H, J18,19 = 8.3, J18,16 = 2.7, H-18-A), 5.98 (d, 1H, J16,18 = 2.7, H-16-A), 5.88 (d, 1H, J16,18 = 2.7, H-16-B), 4.93 (d, 1H, 2J = 6.5, OCHaHbO), 4.90 (ddd, 1H, 3J = 12.7, 4.7, 4J = 0.9, H-21-B), 4.80, 4.83 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, 2J = 6.7, OCH2O), 4.67 (dd, 1H, 3

J = 3.5, 2.6, H-21-A), 4.58 (d, 1H, 2J = 6.5, OCHaHbO), 4.36–4.31 (m, 4H, H-1, OCHaHbO), 4.224,

4.221 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, 2J = 7.2, OCHaHbO), 3.99, 3.98, 3.83, 3.81 (4 × d, 4 × 2H, 2J = 17.3, CH2Ph), 3.36, 3.35 (2 × s, 2 × 3H, CH3O), 3.34 (dd, 2H, 2J = 15.8, 3J = 2.8, H-2a), 2.98 (dd, 1H, 2J = 16.9, 3J = 2.6, H-22a-A), 2.92, 2.90 (2 × s, 3 × 3H, CH3O), 2.90 (dd, 1H, 2J = 15.0, 3J = 4.7, H-22b-B), 2.95– 2.89 (m, 2H, H-2b), 2.73 (dd, 1H, 2J = 16.9, 3J = 3.5, H-22b-A), 2.47 (dd, 1H, 2J = 15.0, 3J = 12.7, H22b-B), 2.28, 2.27, 2.26 (3 × s, 12H, CH3-Tol). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.2, 146.1, 140.5, 140.2, 140.1, 140.0, 138.7, 138.4, 137.3, 137.0, 136.7, 136.5, 136.4, 136.1, 136.0, 135.8, 135.7, 135.52, 135.46, 134.6, 134.2, 134.1, 134.0, 133.8, 133.2, 133.04, 133.00, 132.8, 132.4, 131.0, 130.9, 130.22, 130.17, 130.15, 130.12, 130.10, 130.0, 129.94, 129.92, 129.8, 129.5, 128.5, 128.35, 128.31, 128.26, 127.99, 127.95, 127.91, 127.87, 127.7, 127.63, 127.62, 127.55, 127.5, 127.3, 126.85, 126.84, 126.5, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 125.1, 125.0, 124.21, 124.20, 122.9, 121.8, 113.6, 113.5, 110.6, 109.5, 96.7, 96.6, 95.7, 92.7, 74.0, 73.13, 73.05, 69.4, 55.5, 55.4, 55.2, 53.83, 53.76, 36.9, 35.3, 34.8, 21.23, 21.20, 21.19, . IR (CHCl3): 3063 w, 3051 w, 3031 w, 2948 w, 2927 w, 2890 w, 2845 vw, 2825 w,

20


Page 21 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


1611 m, 1605 m, 1559 w, 1517 w, 1511 m, 1494 m, 1465 w, 1451 m, 1442 w, 1390 w, 1361 m, 1147 m, 1120 w, 1095 m, 1076 w, 1035 vs, 911 w, 819 w, 696 w cm–1. MALDI MS: 827 ([M]+). HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M]+ Calcd for C58H53NO4 827.3974; Found 827.3974. (-)-(M)-N,N-Dibenzyl-7,8-bis(4-methylphenyl)hexahelicen-2-amine (23). A flask was charged with Tol Tol

Bn2N

tetrahydrohelicene (-)-(M,RS,S)-22 (2.328 g, 2.811 mmol), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (5.347 g, 28.11 mmol, 10.0 equiv.), and flushed with argon. Toluene (75 mL) was added, the flask sealed with a stopcock, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the reaction was

quenched with a saturated solution of NaHCO3 (100 mL), the layers were separated, and the aqueous layer extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, the solvents were removed in vacuo, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 40:1) to furnish helicene (-)-(M)-23 (1.863 g, 94%, >99% ee) as a yellow solid. Chiral HPLC: Chiralpak IA column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Chiral Technologies), mobile phase: hexane-dichloromethane (90:10 with 0.1% diethylamine), flow rate: 1 mL/min, retention time: 10.28 min. Mp 145–146 °C (hexane-ethyl acetate). Optical rotation: [α]20D = 1 409° (c 0.260, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.92–7.85 (m, 3H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (ddd, J = 8.0, 6.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.05 (m, 14H), 7.03 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.83–6.76 (m, 4H), 6.73 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.12–3.98 (m, 4H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.35 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.3, 138.4, 138.0, 137.3, 137.0, 136.8, 135.94, 135.87, 132.4, 132.0, 131.8, 131.7, 131.5, 131.0, 130.8, 130.73, 130.70, 128.54, 128.46, 128.45, 128.44, 128.40, 128.36, 128.3, 127.7, 127.6, 127.51, 127.50, 127.2, 126.8, 126.7, 126.6, 126.3, 125.8, 125.6, 124.8, 124.3, 124.1, 120.9, 113.9, 109.3, 53.9, 21.4. IR (CHCl3): 3086 w, 3063 w, 3052 w, 3033 w, 2958 m, 2871 m, 1615 s, 1605 m, 1564 w, 1521 vs, 1494 m, 1466 m, 1452 m, 1444 w, 1388 m, 1360 m, 1298 w, 1189 m, 1167 w, 1080 w, 1028 w, 1110 w, 1022 m, 835 m, 830 m, 822 m, 700 w cm-1. MALDI MS: 703 ([M]+). HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M]+ Calcd for C54H41N 703.3239; Found 703.3221. UV/Vis (tetrahydrofuran): λmax (log ε) = 253 (4.83), 275 (4.74), 315 nm (4.58). Fluorescence (tetrahydrofuran, λexc = 345 nm): λmax = 480 nm. (-)-(M)-7,8-Bis(4-methylphenyl)hexahelicen-2-amine (2). A flask was charged with the protected Tol H2N

Tol

helicene (-)-(M)-23 (739 mg, 1.05 mmol), ammonium formate (1.324 g, 21.0 mmol, 20.0 equiv.), and palladium (10% on activated charcoal, 134 mg, 0.126 mmol, 12 mol%). Then ethanol (105 mL) was added and the mixture was sonicated at room temperature for 1 h. Afterward, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 2 h. After

completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude product was filtered through a short pad of celite (ethyl acetate) to provide aminohelicene (-)-(M)-2 (533 mg, 97%, >99% ee) as a yellow solid. Chiral HPLC: Chiralpak IA column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Chiral Technologies), 21



Page 22 of 35

mobile phase: hexane-dichloromethane (3:1 with 0.1% diethylamine), flow rate: 1 mL/min, retention time: 16.69 min. Mp 299–302 °C (heptane). Optical rotation: [α]20D = -2074° (c 0.114, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 7.96–7.90 (m, 2H), 7.86–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.76– 7.72 (m, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.09 (m, 8H), 6.81–6.74 (m, 2H), 6.66 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (s, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.37 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 144.9, 138.3, 137.7, 137.5, 137.3, 136.7, 136.6, 132.8, 132.5, 132.2, 132.1, 131.8, 131.5, 131.4, 131.10, 131.07, 130.9, 129.1, 128.9, 128.85, 128.83, 128.75, 128.3, 128.0, 127.90, 127.87, 127.5, 126.9, 126.80, 126.7, 126.2, 126.1, 125.8, 125.1, 124.5, 121.6, 116.8, 111.6, 21.5. IR (CHCl3): 3480 vw, 3449 vw, 3379 w, 3052 w, 2957 m, 1625 s, 1605 m, 1519 s, 1463 m, 1426 w, 1382 m, 1363 w, 1339 w, 1306 w, 1282 w, 1272 w, 1253 m, 1237 m, 1183 m, 1146 w, 1109 m, 1079 w, 1052 w, 1040 w, 1022 m, 959 w, 875 w, 834 vs, 818 m cm-1. ESI MS: 524 ([M+H]+). MALDI MS: 523 ([M]+). HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M]+ Calcd for C40H29N 523.2300; Found 523.2295. UV/Vis (tetrahydrofuran): λmax (log ε) = 207 (4.95), 210 (4.94), 248 (4.93), 270 (4.93), 314 (4.65), 335 nm (4.54). Fluorescence (tetrahydrofuran, λexc = 430 nm): λmax = 487 nm. (+)-(P)-7,8-Bis(4-methylphenyl)hexahelicen-2-amine (2). Aminohelicene (+)-(P)-2 (97% ee) was Tol Tol

H2N

synthesized following the procedure for the synthesis of (-)-(M)-2, starting from (+)(R)-19.16b Chiral HPLC: Chiralpak IA column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Chiral Technologies), mobile phase: hexane-dichloromethane (3:1 with 0.1% diethylamine), flow rate: 1 mL/min, retention time: 8.24 min. Crystallization of the

enantioenriched amino[6]helicene (+)‐(P)-2: Compound (+)‐(P)-2 (40 mg, 97% ee) was suspended in heptane (3 mL) and sonicated at room temperature for 1 h (a fine suspension changed to a very fluffy suspension). Then it was refluxed for 10 min, cooled to room temperature, filtered through a frit and the residue was washed with heptane (2 mL) to provide (+)‐(P)-2 (35 mg, 88%, >99% ee) as yellow needles. Chiral HPLC: Chiralpak IA column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Chiral Technologies), mobile phase: hexane-dichloromethane (3:1 with 0.1% diethylamine), flow rate: 1 mL/min, retention time: 8.14 min. Mp 300–303 °C (heptane). Optical rotation: [α]20D = +2179° (c 0.118, CHCl3). Synthesis of 2-Aminobenzo[6]helicene (-)-(M)-3. 4-Bromo-3-((trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)aniline (24). A Schlenk flask was charged with iodoaniline 7 (4.47 g, 15.0 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (210

H2N Br

TMS

mg, 0.300 mmol, 2 mol%), CuI (115 mg, 0.600 mmol, 4 mol%), and flushed with argon. Then diisopropylamine (120 mL) was added and the mixture was degassed by three

freeze pump thaw cycles. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C and (trimethylsilyl)acetylene (2.2 mL, 15.75 mmol, 1.05 equiv.) was added via syringe. The cooling bath was removed, the reaction mixture allowed to warm slowly to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 5:1) to give alkyne 24 (3.962 g, 99%) as a brownish oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.29 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.65 22


Page 23 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(s, 2H), 0.26 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.4, 132.9, 125.5, 119.7, 117.1, 113.8, 103.4, 98.9, 0.0. IR (CHCl3): 3491 w, 3403 w, 3380 w, 2900 w, 2160 w, 1620 s, 1594 m, 1571 w, 1466 s, 1424 w, 1410 w, 1262 w, 1251 s, 1138 m, 1032 m, 857 vs, 846 vs, 814 m, 699 w, 465 m cm–1. EI MS: 267 (M+•, 83), 252 (100), 224 (5), 172 (13), 158 (10), 130 (28), 109 (9), 89 (4), 77 (5). HRMS (EI) m/z: [M+•] Calcd for C11H14N79BrSi 267.0079; Found 267.0073. tert-Butyl (4-Bromo-3-ethynylphenyl)carbamate (25). A flask was charged with alkyne 24 (2.792 g, 10.41 mmol), flushed with argon, and the compound was dissolved in ethanol (21 mL).

BocHN Br

Di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (3.59 mL, 15.615 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After completion (checked by

TLC), all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in methanol (65 mL), K2CO3 (2.16 g, 15.615 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) was added, and the suspension was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the reaction was quenched with a saturated NH4Cl solution (20 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude product purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give carbamate 25 (2.742 g, 89%, after 2 steps) as an off white solid. Mp 129–131 °C (ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.58 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (s, 1H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 1.51 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.4, 137.7, 132.9, 124.7, 123.6, 120.3, 118.7, 81.9, 81.8, 81.4, 28.4. IR (CHCl3): 3437 s, 3306 s, 2982 m, 2120 vw, 1728 vs, 1597 s, 1576 s, 1514 vs, 1478 s, 1467 s, 1394 vs, 1377 s, 1370 s, 1270 s, 1241 s, 1156 vs, 1036 m, 867 m, 814 m, 658 m, 630 m, 462 w cm-1. CI MS: 296 ([M+H]+ with 79Br). HRMS (CI) m/z: [[M]+ Calcd for C13H14NO279Br 295.0208; Found 295.0210. (+)-tert-Butyl (S)-(4-bromo-3-((2-(2-(methoxymethoxy)-4-(triisopropylsilyl)but-3-yn-1-yl)naphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl)phenyl)carbamate (26). A Schlenk flask was charged with

BocHN

iodide (-)-(S)-1916b (1.045 g, 2.00 mmol, 0.77 equiv.), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (28 mg,

Br TIPS OMOM

0.040 mmol, 2 mol%), CuI (15 mg, 0.080 mmol, 3 mol%), and flushed with argon. Then diisopropylamine (20 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pumpthaw cycles) was added via cannula. Another Schlenk flask was charged with

alkyne 25 (0.77 g, 2.60 mmol), flushed with argon, and diisopropylamine (25 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via cannula. Then the alkyne solution was added dropwise via cannula over 10 min to the iodide solution and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give diyne (+)-(S)-26 (1.259 g, 70%) as a yellowish oil. Optical rotation: [α]20D = +21.2° (c 0.288, CHCl3). 1

H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.55 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,

1H), 7.59 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.50 (ddd, J = 8.0, 6.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 23



Page 24 of 35

7.47–7.43 (m, 1H), 6.56 (s, 1H), 4.95 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.08 (s, 3H), 1.54 (s, 9H), 1.04–0.99 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.5, 139.0, 137.8, 133.7, 133.0, 132.2, 129.1, 128.5, 128.1, 127.1, 126.5, 126.13, 126.08, 122.9, 119.9, 119.7, 118.5, 106.0, 97.3, 94.2, 90.6, 87.4, 81.2, 66.5, 55.6, 41.8, 28.5, 18.7, 11.3. IR (CHCl3): 3438 m, 2866 s, 2826 w, 2208 w, 2169 w, 1728 s, 1596 m, 1574 m, 1515 s, 1478 s, 1463 m, 1383 w, 1370 s, 1245 w, 1155 vs, 1146 s, 1097 w, 1033 s, 1027 s, 998 m, 919 w, 911 w, 884 m, 867 w, 831 w cm-1. ESI MS: 712 ([M+Na]+ with 79Br). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C38H48O4N79BrNaSi 712.2428; Found 712.2430. (-)-tert-Butyl (S)-(2-((2-(2-(methoxymethoxy)-4-(triisopropylsilyl)but-3-yn-1-yl)naphthalen-1yl)ethynyl)-2'-((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)carbamate (27).

TIPS BocHN

A flask was charged with diyne (+)-(S)-26 (1.24 g, 1.795 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (126 mg, 0.180 mmol, 10 mol%), K2CO3 (260 mg, 1.885 mmol, 1.05 equiv.), TIPS OMOM

boronic acid 1017 (705, 2.334 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), and flushed with argon. Then a solvent mixture of toluene (32 mL), n-propanol (32 mL), and water (8 mL)

was added and argon was bubbled through the stirred mixture for 10 min. Afterward, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 5 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvents were removed in vacuo, the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give triyne (-)-(S)-27 (1.526 g, 98%) as a yellowish oil. Optical rotation: [α]20D = -41.7° (c 0.437, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.52 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.37 (m, 4H), 7.27 (ddd, J = 8.2, 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (s, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.46– 3.29 (m, 2H), 3.15 (s, 3H), 1.56 (s, 9H), 1.05–1.00 (m, 21H), 0.94–0.90 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.7, 143.7, 137.97 (2 C), 137.95, 133.6, 133.0, 132.1, 130.9, 130.3, 128.8, 128.2, 127.80, 127.76, 127.3, 126.7, 126.5, 125.8, 123.74, 123.70, 121.8, 120.4, 118.5, 106.1, 106.0, 98.5, 94.38, 94.35, 88.9, 87.2, 80.8, 66.5, 55.7, 41.7, 28.5, 18.7, 18.6, 11.4, 11.3. IR (CHCl3): 3440 w, 3058 w, 2958 s, 2943 s, 2865 s, 2827 w, 2175 vw, 2157 w, 1728 m, 1607 w, 1595 w, 1574 w, 1516 m, 1502 m, 1465 m, 1441 w, 1400 w, 1395 w, 1382 w, 1369 m, 1156 s, 1098 m, 1028 m, 997 m, 919 w, 883 m, 816 w, 679 m, 663 m cm–1. MALDI MS: 890 ([M+Na]+). HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C55H73NNaO4Si2 890.4970; Found 890.4977. (-)-tert-Butyl (S)-(2'-ethynyl-2-((2-(2-(methoxymethoxy)but-3-yn-1-yl)naphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl)[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)carbamate (28). A flask was charged with silylated

BocHN

compound (-)-(S)-27 (1.493 g, 1.72 mmol) and dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (22 mL). Then a solution of n-tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (1 M in OMOM

tetrahydrofuran, 5.16 mL, 5.16 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the

reaction was quenched with methanol (10 mL) and the solvents were removed in vacuo. The crude 24


Page 25 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 5:1) to obtain triyne (-)-(S)-28 (890 mg, 93%) as a white solid. Mp 66–67 °C (ethyl acetate). Optical rotation: [α]20D = 24.8° (c 0.262, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.63 (m, 3H), 7.60–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.37 (m, 5H), 7.29 (ddd, J = 8.3, 6.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 4.88 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (ddd, J = 7.4, 6.6, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 3.43– 3.26 (m, 2H), 3.10 (s, 3H), 3.00 (s, 1H), 2.46 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 1.56 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.7, 143.6, 138.1, 137.9, 137.5, 133.5, 133.4, 132.1, 130.9, 130.7, 128.72, 128.68, 128.0, 127.9, 127.5, 126.7, 126.5, 126.0, 123.6, 122.1, 122.0, 120.4, 118.4, 98.4, 94.4, 89.0, 82.9, 82.5, 81.0, 80.7, 74.4, 65.9, 55.6, 41.5, 28.5. IR (CHCl3): 3437 m, 3307 m, 3059 w, 2982 w, 2932 m, 2826 w, 2208 vw, 2116 vw, 2017 vw, 1727 s, 1607 m, 1595 w, 1575 m, 1563 w, 1516 vs, 1504 s, 1473 m, 1455 w, 1441 m, 1412 m, 1400 m, 1394 m, 1369 m, 1300 w, 1155 vs, 1054 m, 1028 s, 951 w, 922 w, 909 m, 868 w, 821 w, 663 m, 651 m, 640 m, 616 w, 437 w cm–1. ESI MS: 578 ([M+Na]+). HR ESI MS: calcd for C37H33NNaO4 578.2302, found 578.2301. HRMS (APCI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C37H34NO4 556.2482; Found 556.2482. (+)-tert-Butyl (S)-(2-((2-(2-(methoxymethoxy)-4-(p-tolyl)but-3-yn-1-yl)naphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl)-2'(p-tolylethynyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)carbamate (29). 4-Iodotoluene (1.046 g,

Tol

4.80 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (56 mg, 0.080 mmol, 5 mol%), CuI (30

BocHN

mg, 0.160 mmol, 10 mol%) were placed in a Schlenk flask, and flushed with Tol

OMOM

argon. Diisopropylamine (15 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via cannula and the mixture was stirred at room temperature

for 5 min. Another Schlenk flask was charged with triyne (-)-(S)-28 (889 mg, 1.60 mmol), flushed with argon, and diisopropylamine (20 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via cannula. Then the triyne solution was added dropwise to the mixture of toluene and catalyst via cannula over 5 min. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo, the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 5:1). The desired triyne (+)-(S)-29 was obtained (1.09 g, 93%) as an off-white solid. Mp 114–115 °C (ethyl acetate). Optical rotation: [α]20D = +71° (c 0.145, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72–7.66 (m, 4H), 7.65–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.59–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.14 (m, 2H), 7.09–7.02 (m, 4H), 6.57 (s, 1H), 4.93 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.89 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 3.49–3.35 (m, 2H), 3.13 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 1.55 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.8, 142.9, 138.5, 138.3, 138.2, 137.9, 137.8, 133.6, 132.3, 132.1, 131.7, 131.5, 131.2, 130.7, 129.2, 129.1, 128.8, 128.1, 127.9, 127.5, 126.7, 126.6, 125.9, 123.8, 123.3, 122.0, 120.53, 120.50, 119.8, 118.3, 98.5, 94.5, 93.1, 89.0, 88.6, 87.3, 86.4, 80.8, 66.8, 55.6, 41.8, 28.5, 21.62, 21.61. IR (CHCl3): 3437 w, 3058 w, 2982 m, 2955 w, 2930 m, 2825 w, 2230 vw, 2217 vw, 1727 s, 1607 m, 1594 w, 1575 m, 1561 w, 1520 s, 1511 vs, 1473 m, 1455 w, 1441

25



Page 26 of 35

m, 1411 w, 1394 m, 1379 m, 1369 m, 1301 w, 1156 vs, 1098 m, 1053 m, 1028 s, 1022 s, 948 w, 923 w, 909 m, 868 w, 819 s, 543 w, 438 w cm–1. ESI MS: 758 ([M+Na]+). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C51H45NNaO4 758.3241; Found 758.3241. HRMS (APCI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C51H46NO4 736.3421; Found 736.3422. (-)-(M)-tert-Butyl (S)-(1-(methoxymethoxy)-17,18-di-p-tolyl-1,2-dihydrobenzo[g]naphtha-[2,1c]chrysen-10-yl)carbamate (30). A microwave vial was charged with triyne (+)-(S)-29 (206 mg, 0.280 mmol), Ni(CO)2(PPh3)2 (54 mg, 0.084 mmol, 30 mol%), closed with a crimp seal, and flushed with argon. Toluene (20 mL) was added and argon was kept to bubble through the stirring mixture for 10 min. Then the mixture was immersed in an oil bath and stirred at 150 °C for 10 min. The mixture was cooled down, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexaneethyl acetate 5:1) to give dihydrohelicene (-)-(M,S)-30 (173 mg, 84%, >99% de) as a beige solid. Chiral HPLC: Chiralpak IA column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Chiral Technologies), mobile phase: heptane-i-PrOH (95:5), flow rate: 1 mL/min, retention time: 6.55 min. Mp 172–175 °C. Optical rotation: [α]20D = -320° (c 0.096, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ δ 8.36 (dd, 1H, J22,23 = 8.2, J22,24 = 1.4, H-22), 8.22 (d, 1H, J19,18 = 9.0, H-19), 7.82 (d, 1H, J5,4 = 8.0, H-5), 7.69 (dd, 1H, J7,8 = 8.0, J7,9 = 1.5, H-7), 7.60 (d, 1H, J4,5 = 8.1, H-4), 7.58 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-o-Tol-29), 7.54 (bd, 1H, J18,19 = 9.0, H-18), 7.48 (dd, 1H, J25,24 = 8.5, J25,23 = 1.2, H-25), 7.41 (ddd, 1H, J23,22 = 8.2, J23,24 = 7.0, J23,25 = 1.2, H-23), 7.27 (m, 1H, H-10), 7.16 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-m-Tol-29), 7.13 (ddd, 1H, J8,7 = 8.0, J8,9 = 6.7, J8,10 = 1.2, H-8), 7.09 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-o-Tol-28), 6.99 (ddd, 1H, J24,25 = 8.5, J24,23 = 7.0, J24,22 = 1.4, H-24), 6.95 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-m-Tol-28), 6.891 (m, 1H, H-16), 6.887 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-m-Tol-28), 6.83 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-m-Tol-29), 6.79 (ddd, 1H, J9,10 = 8.5, J9,8 = 6.7, J9,7 = 1.5, H-9), 6.78 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-o-Tol-28), 6.47 (dd, 1H, 3J = 7.8, 4J = 2.0, H-o-Tol-29), 5.67 (bs, 1H, NH), 4.50 (t, 1H, J1,2 = 2.7, H-1), 4.48, 4.45 (2 × d, 2 × 1H, Jgem = 7.0, OCH2O), 3.55, 3.32 (2 × dd, 2 × 1H, Jgem = 15.8, J2,1 = 2.7, H-2), 2.96 (s, 3H, CH3O), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3-Tol-29), 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3-Tol-28), 1.42 (s, 9H, (CH3)3C). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.3 (CONH), 140.4 (C-29), 139.5 (C-i-Tol-28), 138.1 (C-28), 137.0 (C-i-Tol-29), 136.3 (C-30), 135.9 (C-p-Tol-29), 135.71 (C-p-Tol-29), 135.69 (C-17), 133.4 (C-6), 133.2 (C-12), 132.4 (C-3), 131.9 (CH-o-Tol-28), 131.72, 131.67 (C-14,15), 131.41 (C-21), 131.36 (CH-o-Tol-28, CH-o-Tol-29), 131.1 (C-27), 130.5 (C-26), 130.0 (CH-o-Tol-29), 129.9 (CH-25), 129.4 (C-11), 128.8 (CH-m-Tol-28), 128.70 (C-13), 128.66 (CH-m-Tol-28), 128.23 (CH-5), 128.17 (CH-m-Tol-29), 127.8 (CH-7), 127.7 (CH-4), 127.6 (CH-m-Tol-29), 126.3 (CH-23), 125.9 (CH-10), 125.7 (CH-9), 125.6 (C20), 124.7 (CH-24), 124.6 (CH-8), 123.8 (CH-19), 122.8 (CH-22), 118.4 (CH-18), 117.3 (CH-16), 97.0 (OCH2O), 80.4 ((CH3)3C), 73.5 (CH-1), 55.7 (CH3O), 37.4 (CH2-2), 28.2 ((CH3)3C), 21.3, 21.2 (CH3-Tol). IR (CHCl3): 3438 w, 3054 w, 2982 m, 2825 w, 1725 s, 1615 m, 1586 w, 1565 w, 1515 vs,

26


Page 27 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


1472 m, 1441 w, 1413 m, 1393 m, 1369 m, 1309 w, 1155 vs, 1111 w, 1095 m, 1034 s, 910 m, 860 w, 828 m, 809 w, 541 w cm-1. MALDI MS: 735 ([M]+). HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M]+ Calcd for C51H45NO4 735.3348; Found 735.3354. HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M+Na]+ Calcd for C51H45NNaO4 758.3241; Found 758.3248. (-)-(M)-5,6-Bis(4-methylphenyl)benzo[f]hexahelicen-16-amine (3). The protected dihydrohelicene (-)-(M,S)-30 (30 mg, 0.041 mmol) was placed in a Schlenk flask, flushed with H2N

Tol Tol

argon, and dissolved in dioxane (1.2 mL). Then an HCl solution (4 M in dioxane, 0.62 mL, 2.46 mmol, 60.0 equiv.) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 19 h. The orange mixture was poured into a saturated

NaHCO3 solution (20 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on reversed phase C-18 silica gel (methanol) to afford the crude aminobenzohelicene (-)-(M)-3 (20 mg, 83%) as a yellow solid. An analytically pure sample was obtained by recrystallization from dichloromethane-heptane upon which an impurity precipitated. Chiral HPLC: Chiralpak IA column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Chiral Technologies), mobile phase: hexane-chloroform (9:1), flow rate: 1 mL/min, retention time: 6.44 min, optical purity: >99% ee. Mp 215–217 °C (heptane). Optical rotation: [α]20D = -931° (c 0.016, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 8.42 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.95–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.83 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (dd, J = 7.7, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (ddd, J = 8.2, 7.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.26 (m, 3H), 7.07–7.04 (m, 1H), 7.00–6.92 (m, 3H), 6.82 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J = 7.7, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66–6.63 (m, 2H), 6.51 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 145.3, 140.3, 139.3, 137.53, 137.49, 136.53, 136.47, 132.9, 132.8, 132.53, 132.49, 132.0, 131.14, 131.06, 130.74, 130.72, 130.2, 130.1, 130.0, 129.2, 129.1 (2 C), 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 128.0, 127.3, 126.64, 126.57, 126.3, 126.1, 125.7, 124.7, 124.2, 123.5, 122.8, 121.9, 115.9, 112.5, 21.53, 21.51. IR (CHCl3): 3530 vw, 3484 vw, 3442 vw, 3397 w, 3053 m, 1620 vs, 1581 w, 1516 vs, 1404 vw, 1388 m, 1381 m, 1183 m, 1112 m, 1022 m, 827 m, 541 m cm-1. MALDI MS: 573 ([M]+). HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M+1]+ Calcd for C44H32N 574.2529; Found 574.2528. UV/Vis (tetrahydrofuran): λmax (log ε) = 211 (4.62), 295 nm (4.46). Fluorescence (tetrahydrofuran, λexc = 430 nm): λmax = 496 nm. Synthesis of 2-Aminobenzo[6]helicene rac-4 as a Mixture of Diastereomers. 1-(4Bn2N

TIPS

I

OH

(Dibenzylamino)-2-iodophenyl)-3-(triisopropylsilyl)prop-2-yn-1-ol (31).27 A solution of n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 2.755 mL, 6.89 mmol, 1.05 equiv.) was added slowly at -78 °C over 2 min to a solution of

(triisopropylsilyl)acetylene (1.545 mL, 6.89 mmol, 1.05 equiv.) in tetrahydrofuran (7.870 mL). After stirring at -78 °C for 20 min and at room temperature for 20 min, a solution of benzaldehyde 15 (2.803 27



Page 28 of 35

mg, 6.56 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (6.6 mL) was added at -78 °C. The reaction was kept at -78 °C while stirred for 30 min. After completion (checked by TLC), the reaction was quenched with an HCl solution (1 M, 10 mL). The layers were separated and the aqueous layer extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with a saturated NaHCO3 solution (1 × 20 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-methyl tert-butyl ether 10:1) to give the secondary alcohol rac31 (3.810 g, 95%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.59 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.39–7.27 (m, 6H), 7.25–7.19 (m, 5H), 6.74 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 5.62 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 4H), 2.23 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 1.12–1.08 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.3, 137.6, 130.6, 129.0, 128.9, 127.3, 126.7, 122.7, 112.5, 106.9, 100.6, 88.2, 68.7, 53.9, 18.8, 11.3. IR (CHCl3): 3086 vw, 3062 vw, 3028 w, 2941 m, 2863 m, 1594 s, 1495 s, 1226 m, 1017 s, 729 s, 694 s, 675 s cm-1. EI MS: 609 (M+•, 11), 566 (2), 217 (2), 91 (100), 65 (7), 43 (7). HRMS (EI) m/z: [M+•] Calcd for C32H40ONISi 609.1924; Found 609.1945. N,N-Dibenzyl-3-iodo-4-(1-(methoxymethoxy)-3-(triisopropylsilyl)prop-2-yn-1-yl)aniline (32). A Bn2N

TIPS

Schlenk flask was charged with a solution of alkynol rac-31 (610 mg, 1.00 mmol) in dichloromethane (7 mL) and subsequently 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine

I

OMOM

(12 mg, 0.100 mmol, 10 mol%), i-Pr2NEt (0.244 mL, 1.40 mmol, 1.4 equiv.),

and chloromethyl methyl ether (0.114 mL, 1.50 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) were added, the flask was closed with a glass stopper, and the formed solution was stirred at 35 °C for 16 h. Afterward, the reaction was quenched with a saturated NaHCO3 solution (10 mL), the layers were separated, and the aqueous one was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give MOM-ether rac-32 (510 mg, 78%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.57 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.27 (m, 6H), 7.25–7.18 (m, 5H), 6.76 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 4H), 3.50 (s, 3H), 1.17–1.04 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.4, 137.7, 130.1, 128.89, 128.87, 127.3, 126.7, 122.4, 112.7, 104.9, 101.0, 94.4, 89.2, 72.3, 56.8, 53.9, 18.8, 11.3. IR (CHCl3): 3088 w, 3065 w, 3032 w, 2958 m, 2945 s, 2866 s, 2826 w, 2170 w, 1597 vs, 1586 m, 1503 s, 1495 s, 1463 m, 1453 m, 1441 w, 1396 m, 1384 w, 1361 m, 1352 m, 1149 s, 1091 m, 1076 w, 1039 s, 1028 s, 1011 s, 883 m, 810 w, 697 m, 679 m, 659 w cm-1. ESI MS: 654 ([M+H]+). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C34H45O2NISi 654.2258; Found 654.2261. N,N-Dibenzyl-3-((2-bromonaphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl)-4-(1-(methoxymethoxy)-3-(triisoproBn2N

TIPS

OMOM Br

pylsilyl)prop-2-yn-1-yl)aniline (33). A Schlenk flask was charged with iodide rac-32 (505 mg, 0.772 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (11 mg, 0.015 mmol, 2 mol%), CuI (6 mg, 0.031 mmol, 4 mol%), and flushed with argon. Then diisopropylamine (6 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via syringe. 28


Page 29 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Another Schlenk flask was charged with alkyne 6 (214 mg, 0.926 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), flushed with argon, and diisopropylamine (8 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via syringe. Then the alkyne solution was added dropwise via syringe to the iodide solution over 3 min and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo, the crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give diyne rac-33 (468 mg, 80%) as a yellowish oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.39–8.33 (m, 1H), 7.82–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.66–7.62 (m, 3H), 7.59–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.32 (m, 4H), 7.31–7.26 (m, 6H), 7.08 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (s, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 4H), 3.31 (s, 3H), 1.07– 1.05 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.2, 138.2, 134.5, 131.8, 129.7, 129.6, 129.5, 128.9, 128.5, 128.3, 127.8, 127.2, 126.83, 126.75 (2 C), 125.1, 123.2, 122.6, 116.0, 113.9, 105.4, 97.8, 94.4, 90.0, 88.4, 66.3, 56.1, 54.4, 18.8, 11.4. IR (CHCl3): 3087 w, 3065 w, 3033 w, 2958 s, 2944 s, 2866 s, 2825 w, 2208 vw, 2170 w, 1601 vs, 1586 m, 1578 m, 1568 m, 1559 m, 1511 s, 1501 s, 1495 s, 1463 m, 1453 s, 1440 m, 1428 w, 1395 m, 1384 m, 1362 m, 1352 m, 1317 m, 1298 m, 1251 m, 1163 m, 1149 s, 1106 m, 1092 m, 1080 m, 1040 s, 1010 vs, 1028 s, 964 s, 921 m, 883 m, 811 s, 697 s, 679 m, 660 m, 651 m, 614 w cm–1. ESI MS: 779 ([M+H+Na]+, with 79Br). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C46H51O2N79BrSi 756.2867; Found 756.2870. N,N-Dibenzyl-4-(1-(methoxymethoxy)-3-(triisopropylsilyl)prop-2-yn-1-yl)-3-((2-(2-((triisoBn2N

TIPS

propylsilyl)ethynyl)phenyl)naphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl)aniline (34). A flask was charged with arene rac-33 (417 mg, 0.551 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (39 mg, 0.055

OMOM

mmol, 10 mol%), K2CO3 (80 mg, 0.579 mmol, 1.05 equiv.), boronic acid 1017 (216 mg, 0.716 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), and flushed with argon. Then a solvent

TIPS

mixture of toluene (10 mL), n-propanol (10 mL), and water (2.5 mL) was added

and argon was bubble through the stirred mixture for 10 min. Afterward, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 5 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo, the crude was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give triyne rac-34 (453 mg, 88%) as a yellowish oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.34 (m, 5H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.26–7.22 (m, 4H), 7.11 (td, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (td, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (s, 1H), 5.03 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 4H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 1.11–1.07 (m, 21H), 0.83–0.78 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.3, 144.0, 142.4, 138.2, 133.4, 132.8, 132.6, 130.5, 129.6, 128.9, 128.03, 127.97, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 127.4, 127.2, 127.1, 126.92, 126.86, 126.4, 124.0, 123.3, 119.9, 115.3, 113.1, 106.0, 105.6, 96.2, 94.3, 94.2, 90.7, 87.9, 66.1, 56.0, 53.6, 18.8, 18.5, 11.4, 11.2. IR (CHCl3): 3087 w, 3063 w, 3033 vw, 2958 vs, 2944 vs, 2866 vs, 2826 w, 2205 vw, 2178 w, 2156 w, 1600 vs, 1585 m, 1562 m, 1511 s, 1495 m, 1469 s, 1463 s, 1453 s, 1443 m, 1397 m, 1383 m, 1361 m,

29



Page 30 of 35

1354 m, 1175 w, 1149 s, 1091 s, 1076 m, 1046 m, 1028 s, 1010 s, 996 s, 920 m, 883 s, 868 w, 818 s, 700 s, 679 s, 660 m, 613 w, 498 w cm-1. MALDI MS: 934 ([M+H]+). HRMS (MALDI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C63H76NO2Si2 934.5409; Found 934.5405. N,N-Dibenzyl-3-((2-(2-ethynylphenyl)naphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl)-4-(1-(methoxymethoxy)-prop-2-yn1-yl)aniline (35). A flask was charged with the silylated compound rac-34 (453 mg,

Bn2N

0.455 mmol) and dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (6.3 mL). Then a solution of ntetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (1 M in tetrahydrofuran, 1.5 mL, 1.455

OMOM

mmol, 3.0 equiv.) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the reaction was quenched with methanol (10 mL) and the solvents were removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 5:1) to obtain the deprotected triyne rac-35 (222 mg, 74%) as a yellowish solid. Mp 59–61 °C (hexane-ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.56 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.93–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.67–7.45 (m, 5H), 7.45–7.20 (m, 11H), 7.16–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.72 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 5.80 (s, 1H), 4.96 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (s, 4H), 3.31 (s, 3H), 2.86 (s, 1H), 2.57 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.3, 144.0, 142.0, 138.1, 133.4, 133.1, 132.6, 130.8, 129.1, 128.9, 128.2 (2 C), 127.91, 127.88, 127.5, 127.4, 127.24, 127.16 (2 C), 126.8, 126.6, 123.6, 121.7, 119.9, 115.3, 113.3, 96.0, 94.2, 90.8, 82.9, 82.3, 80.5, 74.7, 65.2, 56.0, 53.8. IR (CHCl3): 3307 m, 3087 w, 3064 w, 3032 w, 2955 m, 2826 w, 2205 vw, 2116 w, 2107 w, 1600 vs, 1562 m, 1511 s, 1495 m, 1486 m, 1465 w, 1453 m, 1442 m, 1361 m, 1262 w, 1150 m, 1094 m, 1028 s, 1021 s, 811 w, 697 m, 556 w cm–1. APCI MS: 622 ([M+H]+). HRMS (APCI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C45H36O2N 622.2741; Found 622.2741. N,N-Dibenzyl-4-(1-(methoxymethoxy)-4-(p-tolyl)but-2-yn-1-yl)-3-((2-(2-(3-(p-tolyl)prop-1-yn-1Bn2N

Tol

yl)phenyl)naphthalen-1-yl)ethynyl)aniline (36). 4-Iodotoluene (98 mg, 0.450 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (5 mg, 0.008 mmol, 5 mol%), and CuI (3 mg,

OMOM

0.015 mmol, 10 mol%) were placed in a Schlenk flask and flushed with argon. Diisopropylamine (1 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was

Tol

added via syringe and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min.

Another Schlenk flask was charged with triyne rac-35 (93 mg, 0.150 mmol), flushed with argon, and diisopropylamine (1 mL, prior degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles) was added via syringe. Then the triyne solution was added dropwise to the mixture of aryl halide and catalyst via syringe over 15 min. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After completion (checked by TLC), the solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude product purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 5:1). The desired triyne rac-36 (86 mg, 72%) was obtained as a yellow solid. Mp 71–73 °C (hexane-ethyl acetate). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.62 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.63–7.52 (m, 4H), 7.45–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.39–7.29 (m, 8H), 7.25–7.21 (m, 4H), 7.10–7.04 (m, 4H), 7.02–6.93 (m, 4H), 6.71 (dd, J = 8.7, 30


Page 31 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (s, 1H), 5.03 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (s, 4H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.26 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.3, 143.4, 142.3, 138.4, 138.2, 138.1, 133.5, 132.6, 132.1, 131.8, 131.3, 130.9, 129.3, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.4, 128.13, 128.09, 127.6, 127.54, 127.53, 127.24, 127.21, 127.1, 126.9, 126.5, 123.7, 123.1, 120.4, 120.0, 119.9, 115.4, 113.3, 96.2, 94.2, 93.0, 90.9, 88.6, 87.0, 86.8, 66.0, 56.0, 53.7, 21.60, 21.58. IR (CHCl3): 3063 w, 3012 w, 2926 w, 2825 w, 2218 w, 1600 s, 1586 w, 1563 w, 1510 s, 1495 m, 1485 w, 1465 w, 1453 m, 1361 m, 1258 w, 1149 m, 1092 m, 1028 s, 1020 m, 992 w, 819 s, 807 w, 697 m, 556 w cm–1. APCI MS: 802 ([M+H]+). HRMS (APCI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C59H48O2N 802.3680; Found 802.3682. N,N-Dibenzyl-7-(methoxymethoxy)-5,6-di-p-tolyl-7H-fluoreno[4,3-g]chrysen-10-amine (4). A microwave tube was charged with triyne rac-36 (11 mg, 0.014 mmol) and 1‐butyl‐

OMOM Tol Tol Bn2N

2,3‐dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (45 mg), flushed with argon, and dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (4 mL). Then a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (0.5 M in tetrahydrofuran, 28 μL, 0.014 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was added and the reaction

mixture was heated in a microwave reactor at 180 °C for 15 min. The solvent was removed and the residue purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate 10:1) to give the crude helical compound 4 (8 mg, 73%) as an off white amorphous solid. As all attempts at separation of diastereisomers failed, the diastereomeric ratio of 1.7:1 was determined by the 1H NMR analysis (from the comparison of the well resolved signals of the methoxy groups at δ 3.11 and 3.21 ppm). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): The both diastereomers decompose during purification process and all attempts at obtaining clear spectra of the both compounds failed. ESI MS: 824 ([M+Na]+). HRMS (APCI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for C59H48O2N 802.3680; Found 802.3681. Langmuir Monolayers and Langmuir-Blodgett Films of rac-, (-)-(M)-, and (+)-(P)-2. Langmuir monolayers and Langmuir-Blodgett films were fabricated on a commercially available KSV Mini device provided by Biolin Scientific. All experiments were measured at constant room temperature (22 °C). As a subphase, an extra pure and deionized water (Milli-Q, 18.2 mcm) was used. Samples were prepared by dissolution of compounds rac-, (-)-(M)-, and (+)-(P)-2 in dichloromethane (HPLC grade, Merck), volume of the sample for each experiment was 30 µL. Concentration of the samples was 1 mgmL-1. Langmuir monolayers were fabricated with compression speed 20 mmmin-1. Langmuir-Blodgett films were deposited on silicon wafers utilizing vertical dipping method with substrate withdrawing speed 1 mm × min-1.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting Information

31



Page 32 of 35

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.xxxxxxx. Copies of NMR spectra of all new compounds, chiral HPLC analysis of 2, 3, 13, and 30 (Figures S1S7), UV-Vis and ECD spectrum of 3 (Figure S8), helicity assignment of (+)-(P)-2 and (-)-(M)-3 by correlations of their experimental CD spectra (Figure S9) (PDF). AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author * E-mail: [email protected]. * E-mail: [email protected]. * E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID Bernd Schmidt: orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-6069 Irena G. Stará: orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-9604 Ivo Starý: orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-3148 Notes The authors declare no competing financial interests. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (Reg. No. 16-08294S) and the Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO: 61388963). The authors acknowledge the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD-fellowship for MK, Grant No. 57314603) and the assistance provided by the Research Infrastructure NanoEnviCz, supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under Project No. LM2015073. REFERENCES (1) Chen, C.-F.; Shen, Y. Helicene Chemistry; Springer: Heidelberg; 2017. (2) Hellou, N.; Srebro-Hooper, M.; Favereau, L.; Zinna, F.; Caytan, E.; Toupet, L.; Dorcet, V.; Jean, M.; Vanthuyne, N.; Williams, J. A. G.; Di Bari, L.; Autschbach, J.; Crassous, J. Enantiopure Cycloiridiated Complexes Bearing a Pentahelicenic N-Heterocyclic Carbene and Displaying LongLived Circularly Polarized Phosphorescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8236–8239. (3) Wang, Z. Y.; Qi, Y.; Bender, T. P.; Gao, J. P. Condensation Polyimides from AB-Type Amino Anhydride Monomers. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 764-769. (4) Teplý, F.; Stará, I. G.; Starý, I.; Kollárovič, A.; Šaman, D.; Vyskočil, Š.; Fiedler, P. Synthesis of 3-Hexahelicenol and Its Transformation to 3-Hexahelicenylamines, Diphenylphosphine, Methyl Carboxylate, and Dimethylthiocarbamate. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5193–5197.

32


Page 33 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(5) (a) op den Brouw, P. M.; Laarhoven, W. H. Addition and Substitution Reactions of Hexahelicene: Bromination, Nitration and Acetylation. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1978, 97, 265–268; (b) van der Meijden, M. W.; Gelens, E.; Quirós, N. M.; Fuhr, J. D.; Gayone, J. E.; Ascolani, H.; Wurst, K.; Lingenfelder, M.; Kellogg, R. M. Synthesis, Properties, and Two-Dimensional Adsorption Characteristics of 5-Amino[6]hexahelicene. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1484–1492. (6) Pieters, G.; Gaucher, A.; Prim, D.; Marrot, J. First Expeditious Synthesis of 6,11-Diamino[6]carbohelicenes. Chem. Commun. 2009, 32, 4827–4828. (7) Žádný, J.; Velíšek, P.; Jakubec, M.; Sýkora, J.; Církva, V.; Storch, J. Exploration of 9Bromo[7]helicene Reactivity. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 6213–6218. (8) (a) Pieters, G.; Gaucher, A.; Marque, S.; Maurel, F.; Lesot, P.; Prim, D. Regio-Defined Amino[5]oxa- and Thiahelicenes: A Dramatic Impact of the Nature of the Heteroatom on the Helical Shape and Racemization Barriers. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2096–2098; (b) Takenaka, N.; Chen, J.; Captain, B.; Sarangthem, R. S.; Chandrakumar, A. Helical Chiral 2-Aminopyridinium Ions: A New Class of Hydrogen Bond Donor Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4536–4537. (9) Torricelli, F.; Bosson, J.; Besnard, C.; Chekini, M.; Bürgi, T.; Lacour, J. Modular Synthesis, Orthogonal Post-Functionalization, Absorption, and Chiroptical Properties of Cationic [6]Helicenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1796–1800. (10) Perzyna, A.; Zotto, C. D.; Durand, J.-O.; Granier, M.; Smietana, M.; Melnyk, O.; Stará, I. G.; Starý, I.; Klepetářová, B.; Šaman, D. Reaction of Isocyanate-Functionalised Silicon Wafers with Complex Amino Compounds. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 4032–4037. (11) (a) Takenaka, N.; Sarangthem, R. S.; Captain, B. Helical Chiral Pyridine N-Oxides: A New Family of Asymmetric Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9708–9710; (b) Labrador, G. M.; Bosson, J.; Breitbach, Z. S.; Lim, Y.; Francotte, E. R.; Sabia, R.; Villani, C.; Armstrong, D. W.; Lacour, J. High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Resolution of Neutral and Cationic Hetero[6]Helicenes. Chirality 2016, 28, 282–289. (12) (a) Hellou, N.; Macé, A.; Martin, C.; Dorcet, V.; Roisnel, T.; Jean, M.; Vanthuyne, N.; Berrée, F.; Carboni, B.; Crassous, J. Synthesis of Carbo[6]helicene Derivatives Grafted with Amino or Aminoester Substituents from Enantiopure [6]Helicenyl Boronates. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 484–490; (b) Jakubec, M.; Beránek, T.; Jakubík, P.; Sýkora, J.; Žádný, J.; Církva, V.; Storch, J. 2Bromo[6]helicene as a Key Intermediate for [6]Helicene Functionalization. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 3607–3616. (13) (a) Balandina, T.; van der Meijden, M. W.; Ivasenko, O.; Cornil, D.; Cornil, J.; Lazzaroni, R.; Kellogg, R. M.; Feyter, S. D. Self-Assembly of an Asymmetrically Functionalized [6]Helicene at Liquid/Solid Interfaces. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2207–2209; (b) Ascolani, H.; van der Meijden, M. W.; Cristina, L. J.; Gayone, J. E.; Kellogg, R. M.; Fuhr, J. D.; Lingenfelder, M. Van der Waals Interactions in the Self-Assembly of 5-Amino[6]helicene on Cu(100) and Au(111). Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13907–13909; (c) Fuhr, J. D.; van der Meijden, M. W.; Cristina, L. J.; Rodríguez, L. M.; 33



Page 34 of 35

Kellogg, R. M.; Gayone, J. E.; Ascolani, H.; Lingenfelder, M. Chiral Expression of Adsorbed (MP) 5Amino[6]helicenes: From Random Structures to Dense Racemic Crystals by Surface Alloying. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 130–133. (14) Gay Sánchez, I.; Šámal, M.; Nejedlý, J.; Karras, M.; Klívar, J.; Rybáček, J.; Buděšínský, M.; Bednárová, L.; Seidlerová, B.; Stará, I. G.; Starý, I. Oxahelicene NHC Ligands in the Asymmetric Synthesis of Nonracemic Helicenes. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 4370–4373. (15) (a) Peng, Z.; Takenaka, N. Applications of Helical-Chiral Pyridines as Organocatalysts in Asymmetric Synthesis. Chem. Rec. 2013, 13, 28–42; (b) Narcis, M. J.; Sprague, D. J.; Captain, B.; Takenaka, N. Enantio- and Periselective Nitroalkene Diels–Alder Reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 9134–9136. (16) (a) Žádný, J.; Jančařík, A.; Andronova, A.; Šámal, M.; Vacek Chocholoušová, J.; Vacek, J.; Pohl, R.; Šaman, D.; Císařová, I.; Stará, I. G.; Starý, I. A General Approach to Optically Pure [5]-, [6], and [7]Heterohelicenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5857–5861; (b) Šámal, M.; Chercheja, S.; Rybáček, J.; Vacek Chocholoušová, J.; Vacek, J.; Bednárová, L.; Šaman, D.; Stará, I. G.; Starý, I. An Ultimate Stereocontrol in Asymmetric Synthesis of Optically Pure Fully Aromatic Helicenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8469–8474. (17) Jančařík, A.; Rybáček, J.; Cocq, K.; Vacek Chocholoušová, J.; Vacek, J.; Pohl, R.; Bednárová, L.; Fiedler, P.; Císařová, I.; Stará, I. G.; Starý, I. Rapid Access to Dibenzohelicenes and Their Functionalized Derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9970–9975. (18) (a) Stará, I. G.; Andronova, A.; Kollárovič, A.; Vyskočil, Š.; Jugé, S.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Guiry, P. J.; Starý, I. Enantioselective [2+2+2] Cycloisomerisation of Alkynes in the Synthesis of Helicenes: The Search for Effective Chiral Ligands. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2011, 76, 2005– 2022; (b) Sawada, Y.; Furumi, S.; Takai, A.; Takeuchi, M.; Noguchi, K.; Tanaka, K. RhodiumCatalyzed Enantioselective Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Photophysical Properties of Helically Chiral 1,1′-Bitriphenylenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4080–4083; (c) Heller, B.; Hapke, M.; Fischer, C.; Andronova, A.; Starý, I.; Stará, I. G. Chiral CobaltI and Nickel0 Complexes in the Synthesis of Nonracemic Helicenes Through the Enantioselective [2 + 2 + 2] Cyclotrimerisation of Alkynes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 723, 98–102. (19) Ling, X.; Xiong, Y.; Huang, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, C. Synthesis of Benzidine Derivatives via FeCl3·6H2O-Promoted Oxidative Coupling of Anilines. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 5218– 5226. (20) Newman, M. S.; Darlak, R. S.; Tsai, L. Optical Properties of Hexahelicene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 6191–6193. (21) (a) Verbiest, T.; Elshocht, S. V.; Kauranen, M.; Hellemans, L.; Snauwaert, J.; Nuckolls, C.; Katz, T. J.; Persoons, A. Strong Enhancement of Nonlinear Optical Properties Through Supramolecular Chirality. Science 1998, 282, 913–915; (b) Nuckolls, C.; Katz, T. J.; Verbiest, T.; Elshocht, S. V.; Kuball, H.-G.; Kiesewalter, S.; Lovinger, A. J.; Persoons, A. Circular Dichroism and 34


Page 35 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


UV-Visible Absorption Spectra of the Langmuir-Blodgett Films of an Aggregating Helicene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8656–8660; (c) Fox, J. M.; Katz, T. J.; Van Elshocht, S.; Verbiest, T.; Kauranen, M.; Persoons, A.; Thongpanchang, T.; Krauss, T.; Brus, L. Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Conjugated Helical Metal Phthalocyanine Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3453–3459. (22) Siltanen, M.; Vuorimaa, E.; Lemmetyinen, H.; Ihalainen, P.; Peltonen, J.; Kauranen, M. Nonlinear Optical and Structural Properties of Langmuir−Blodgett Films of Thiohelicenebisquinones. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 1940–1945. (23) Feng, F.; Miyashita, T.; Okubo, H.; Yamaguchi, M. Spreading Behavior of Optically Active Macrocycloamides Consisting of Helical Chiral Units at the Air−Water Interface and the Formation of Langmuir−Blodgett Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10166–10170. (24) Miah, M. J.; Shahabuddin, M.; Karikomi, M.; Salim, M.; Nasuno, E.; Kato, N.; Iimura, K. Structural and Photoelectrical Characterization of Thin Films of a Novel Amphiphilic Oxa[9]helicene Derivative. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 89, 203–211. (25) A more comprehensive study on self-assembly of a series of racemic vs. enantiopure helicene derivatives equipped with polar groups (NH2, OH, CO2H) at the air-water interface to form Langmuir monolayers will be published separately since it goes beyond the scope of this article focused mainly on the asymmetric synthesis of aminohelicenes. (26) Wang, Y.; Liu, T.; Bu, L.; Li, J.; Yang, C.; Li, X.; Tao, Y.; Yang, W. Aqueous Nanoaggregation-Enhanced One- and Two-Photon Fluorescence, Crystalline J-Aggregation-Induced Red Shift, and Amplified Spontaneous Emission of 9,10-Bis(p-dimethylaminostyryl)anthracene. J. Phys. Chem. 2012, 116, 15576–15583. (27) Maraval, V.; Leroyer, L.; Harano, A.; Barthes, C.; Saquet, A.; Duhayon, C.; Shinmyozu, T.; Chauvin, R. 1,4‐Dialkynylbutatrienes: Synthesis, Stability, and Perspectives in the Chemistry of carbo‐Benzenes. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5086–5100.

35


Asymmetric Synthesis of Nonracemic 2-Amino[6]helicenes and Their

Recommend Documents