Subscriber access provided by Technical University of Munich University Library
Environmental Processes
Biogeochemical controls on strontium fate at the sediment – water interface of two groundwater-fed wetlands with contrasting hydrologic regimes Antoine Boyer, Mélisa Hatat-Fraile, and Elodie Passeport Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01876 • Publication Date (Web): 22 Jun 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 7, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Biogeochemical controls on strontium fate at the sediment – water
2
interface of two groundwater-fed wetlands with contrasting
3
hydrologic regimes
4 Antoine Boyer1, Mélisa Hatat-Fraile2, Elodie Passeport1,2*
5 1
6 7 8
Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, 200 College Street, Toronto, M5S 3E5, CANADA
2
Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St George St., Toronto,
9
M5S 1A4, CANADA
10
* Corresponding author: Telephone: +1 416-978-5747. Email:
[email protected].
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 2
11
Abstract
12
Radioactive strontium (Sr) is a common groundwater contaminant at many nuclear sites. Its
13
natural retention in groundwater-fed wetlands is an attractive remediation strategy. However,
14
at present, the biogeochemical mechanisms controlling Sr transport at the sediment – water
15
interface are poorly understood. In this field study, Sr fate was investigated in two wetlands
16
with contrasting vegetation and hydrologic regimes. The marsh was an open-water wetland
17
with constant water table and no emergent vegetation. The swamp was vegetated with
18
fluctuating water levels and a thick mat of submerged cattail litter in the water column. High-
19
resolution porewater Sr concentrations and solid-phase sediment Sr species revealed distinct
20
profiles between the two wetlands. The marsh exhibited a strongly reduced environment and
21
sharp concentration peaks at the sediment – water interface. In contrast, the smaller
22
concentration gradients of the swamp resulted in a reduced flux of Sr to the surface water. The
23
organic fraction of the sediment dominated Sr retention compared to the inorganic iron and
24
manganese oxides. However, the marsh had a significant fraction of recalcitrant Sr presumably
25
due to its incorporation into sulphur and/or carbonate minerals. These results suggest that
26
vegetated wetlands with fluctuating hydrologic regimes could act as efficient sinks for Sr
27
pollution.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 30
Page 3 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology 3
28
TOC graphic
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 4
30
Introduction
31
Strontium is a widely distributed alkaline earth metal whose mobility is controlled by
32
incorporation into minerals and adsorption onto organic and inorganic compounds. The isotope
33
90
34
irradiation.5 Due to its high mobility, it quickly enters groundwater resources through
35
infiltration of contaminated water6,7 or the leaching of wastes,1,3,8 where nuclear facilities such
36
as reactors or waste management areas are present.4 Despite stricter environmental and
37
security regulations, the expected increase in the world’s total nuclear electricity production by
38
20509 could result in more sites being contaminated with 90Sr. At such sites, many
39
groundwater-fed wetlands are present, thus becoming a pathway of 90Sr to surface water. The
40
potential to use wetlands as a remediation strategy to retain 90Sr pollution deserves further
41
attention. The top 10 cm of wetland sediments, called the benthic boundary, hosts various
42
macro-organisms whose exposure to 90Sr amplifies the transfer of the radionuclide through the
43
food chain. To protect this key environmental compartment, a better understanding of Sr fate
44
at the sediment – water interface is required.
45
To date, very limited research has evaluated the fate of Sr in wetlands.10–12 Kröpfelová
46
et al.11 and Šíma et al.10 investigated the inlet versus outlet Sr removal efficiency of horizontal
47
subsurface flow wetlands receiving municipal wastewater. Limited removal, < 28%, was
48
observed for influent Sr concentrations ranging from 234 to 840 μg/L.10 In contrast, through
49
laboratory column experiments, Thorpe et al. showed that both oxic and anoxic subsurface
50
sand/gravel sediments had a high capacity for Sr adsorption.13 Boyer et al.12 conducted a
51
detailed characterization of the Sr adsorption and desorption potentials of various wetland
Sr is a toxic radiochemical with a half-life of 28.8 years1–4 that is only produced by nuclear fuel
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 30
Page 5 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology 5
52
substrates. The authors reported very large Koc adsorption coefficients, ranging from 549 ± 5
53
L/kg for leaf litter to 5,960 ± 150 L/kg for moss. Limited desorption was observed, in particular
54
for substrates rich in proteins.
55
Wetland sediments encompass a wide range of redox and microbial conditions, which are a
56
result of large quantities of organic matter and frequent fluctuations of the water level.14
57
Although Sr itself is not a redox-sensitive species, remaining at its Sr2+ oxidation state below pH
58
13 regardless of the redox potential,15,16 Sr fate can be affected by changes in redox conditions
59
due to its complexation with redox-sensitive species. For example, Sr sulfide can form as a
60
result of hydrogen sulfide production by sulfate-reducing microorganisms.17,18 However, unlike
61
other metals such as copper, arsenic, and iron, Sr sulfide is soluble.10,11 Strontium sulfate, which
62
is mostly insoluble, is not expected to form in wetlands since it forms only at high pH and Sr
63
concentrations.19
64
Iron(III) and manganese(III/IV) oxyhydroxides are well-known sorbents for Sr.6,20,21 However,
65
their contribution to removing Sr from sediment porewater is only temporary as Sr can be
66
released under anoxic conditions upon reductive dissolution of the oxyhydroxides.22 In addition,
67
Frohne et al.23 showed that Sr may not complex with all oxyhydroxides, and other authors have
68
suggested that Sr complexes with soil organic matter may have been mistaken as complexes
69
with oxyhydroxides.20,24 Indeed, Sr can also adsorb on organic material,12,25 as well as
70
carbonates21,26–28 and clay minerals such as montmorillonite, kaolinite, and illite.29–31 While
71
Boyer et al.12 highlighted the role of organic matter and specific functional groups in the strong
72
retention of Sr, to date, the relative contributions of organic matter and inorganic compounds
73
for Sr retention in wetland sediments is still unclear.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 6
74
The goal of this study was to compare the speciation of Sr at the sediment – water interface of
75
two wetlands with different vegetation and hydrologic regimes. Specifically, the objective was
76
to investigate the relative roles of organic and inorganic compounds for Sr fate. The main
77
components of the approach were an in situ characterization of steady-state porewater
78
biogeochemical signatures and solid-phase sediment chemistry. The implications of the results
79
for the management of wetlands receiving Sr-polluted water are discussed.
80 81
Materials and methods
82
Site description
83
The field study was conducted at the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) at Chalk River
84
(Ontario, Canada), located about 150 km north-west of Ottawa along the southwestern bank of
85
the Ottawa River. Groundwater at the site contains natural Sr. Two groundwater-fed wetlands
86
located near the north boundary, a marsh and a swamp, were sampled. The swamp sampling
87
location was approximately 130 m upstream of the marsh’s, and both presumably received the
88
same input of Sr from the groundwater. The marsh was continuously saturated. Contrarily, the
89
water level in the swamp changed significantly during the sampling period, resulting in the
90
alternation of flooded vs. partially saturated sediments, as seen in Supporting Information (SI)
91
Figure S1. The marsh was an open water wetland with no emergent vegetation but some algae,
92
while the swamp was densely vegetated with cattails (Typha latifolia) (SI Figure S2). In the
93
swamp, no living plants were present in the immediate vicinity of the porewater and sediment
94
sampling locations. However, the swamp surface water had a dense mat of submerged cattail
95
litter.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 30
Page 7 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology 7
96 97
Field sampling
98
The wetland sediment porewater was collected using passive equilibrium samplers called
99
peepers, allowing a 1-cm vertical sampling resolution (SI Figure S3). The peepers were covered
100
by a 0.22-μm polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Synder Filtration, Vacaville, USA), previously
101
tested to ensure its permeability to Sr (SI Section S2 and Figure S4).
102
The peepers were washed with soap and water to remove any machining residues. They were
103
then soaked in 5% nitric acid for 2 days and rinsed with deionized (DI) water. The membranes
104
were soaked in distilled water for 2 days and DI water for one day, replacing the water every
105
day. After cleaning, the peepers were assembled while submerged in DI water. The membrane
106
was held in place between the cover and the body of the peeper by multiple nylon screws.
107
After assembly, the peepers were placed in a hermetic barrel of DI water where N2 was
108
bubbling to keep the water oxygen content below 4%. The peepers were stored and
109
transported in the barrel until deployment 5 days after the start of the deoxygenation process.
110
A total of four peepers were deployed, two in the swamp, called Swamp-1 and Swamp-2 and
111
two in the marsh, called Marsh-1 and Marsh-2 (SI Figure S2). At each location, the two peepers
112
were placed about 30 cm away from each other. The peepers were retrieved after 5 weeks in
113
the field to allow for equilibrium. Any cells that were not permanently submerged or appeared
114
damaged were not sampled. Their submersion was monitored on a weekly visit of the sites. The
115
approximate relative depth of the sediment surface, defined as depth zero, for each peeper at
116
the time of retrieval was determined by visual observation of residual sediment and
117
discoloration on the membrane. At the time of retrieval, the porewater samples from each
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 8
118
chamber were collected using a syringe (SI Section S1). Peeper retrieval and sample collection
119
was completed in less than an hour.
120
After the peepers were retrieved, three sediment cores were sampled at each site. The cores
121
were sampled less than 20-cm away from their respective peeper locations. The cores were
122
sampled and extruded using an Incremental Core Extruding Apparatus from Aquatic Research
123
Instruments (Hope, USA). The coring tube was pushed into the sediments manually, sealed and
124
the core pulled out. The length of each core was limited by the maximum manual strength that
125
could be applied to the coring equipment. On average, the peepers were 63 cm deep in the
126
swamp and 61 cm deep in the marsh, but the core depths were 40, 40, and 35 cm in the
127
swamp, and 60, 45, and 45 cm in the marsh. The sediment in the swamp was unconsolidated
128
and some mixing could have occurred when the core was collected. In the swamp, the depths
129
of the sediment cores were shorter than in the marsh due to the difficulty of sampling through
130
the consolidation of organic detritus in the swamp sediment. In the marsh, the two 45-cm long
131
cores were shorter than the peeper length due to an impenetrable layer of fine sediment,
132
which was shallower than in the longer marsh sediment core. The cores were extruded at 5 cm
133
intervals, air dried, and stored at room temperature until further analysis.
134 135
Porewater analysis
136
All porewater samples were analyzed within one week for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and
137
anions concentrations, and within 2 weeks for metals. Porewater DOC concentrations were
138
analysed following EPA procedure 415.1-415.332 with a Fusion UV/Persulfate TOC analyzer
139
(Teledyne Tekmar, Mason, USA), and a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.19 mg/L. Anions were
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 30
Page 9 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology 9
140
quantified following EPA method 300.033 with a Dionex ICS-1600 (ThermoFisher Scientific,
141
Whaltam, USA) Ion Chromatograph (IC), for nitrate (NO3−), phosphate (PO43−), bromide (Br−),
142
sulfate (SO42−), and chloride (Cl−); the LODs were 0.02, 0.19, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02 mg/L, respectively.
143
Total iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), calcium (Ca), aluminum (Al), and Sr were analysed following
144
EPA method 60034 by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP/OES) with
145
a 700-series ICP/OES (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA), and LODs of 0.07, 0.0008, 0.02,
146
0.05, and 0.0006 mg/L, respectively.34
147 148
Sediment analysis
149
All 5-cm sediment subsamples were air-dried, ground, and sieved to 2 mm. One gram of sample
150
was used for elemental analysis using a LECO SC444 (LECO, Saint Joseph, USA) for total carbon
151
(TC), total inorganic carbon (TIC), total organic carbon (TOC), and total nitrogen (TN) analyses.
152
The air-dried samples were combusted to CO2 for TC analysis, and were combusted after ashing
153
at 475 °C to measure the TIC. The TOC was calculated from the difference between TC and
154
TIC.35 The Dumas combustion method was used for TN analysis.36
155
Sequential extraction procedures (SEPs) have been widely used to speciate adsorbed metals.37
156
To speciate the Sr bound to the wetland sediment, the core samples were sequentially
157
extracted using a method adapted from Benitez38 and described in detail in SI Section S3 and
158
Table S1. First, the total metals, including total Sr, was determined following a procedure
159
adapted from Moldoveanu and Papangelakis.39 Then, four sequential extraction steps were
160
completed on a separate sediment sample to quantify Sr in five fractions: F1: exchangeable, F2:
161
adsorbed to organic material, F3: adsorbed to Mn oxides and amorphous Fe oxides, F4:
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 10
162
adsorbed to crystalline Fe oxides, and F5: residual. The residual fraction was obtained by
163
subtracting all fractions to the total Sr measured. All extracts’ Sr concentrations were measured
164
using the same ICP/OES method as described above for the porewater samples.
165
Finally, the particle size distribution was measured on three subsamples from each location
166
with a Patrica LA-950 V2 Horiba after rewetting the samples and breaking down the aggregates
167
via manual crushing and ultrasonication (SI Section S4).
168 169
Results and discussion
170
1. Surface water and porewater
171
1.1 Dissolved organic carbon profiles
172
The different hydrologic regimes and vegetation caused distinct DOC concentration profiles for
173
the swamp and the marsh (Figure 1). The swamp surface water DOC concentrations were 25
174
and 26 mg/L for Swamp-1 and Swamp-2, respectively, 1 cm above the sediment surface. The
175
swamp porewater DOC concentrations then decreased to 17 and 15 mg/L in Swamp-1 and
176
Swamp-2, respectively, at −45 cm. Below −45 cm, a sharp increase in DOC concentrations
177
initiated up to 28 mg/L in Swamp-1 and 40 mg/L in Swamp-2. Such an increase in DOC
178
porewater concentration in deep horizons of sediments was also observed in other studies.14,40
179
For example, Baez-Cazull et al.14 attributed the deep porewater DOC concentration increase, 30
180
cm below the sediment surface, to organic acids originating from the partial microbial
181
fermentation of organic matter in this zone.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 30
Page 11 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology
Swamp-1
Swamp-2
Marsh-1
Marsh-2
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
Depth [cm]
a
182 183
Figure 1: Porewater concentration gradients for Swamp-1 and 2 (top panels), and Marsh-1 and 2 (bottom panels). The dissolved
184
organic carbon (DOC), total iron, total manganese, sulphate, and total strontium concentrations in the two peepers for each
185
separate location are plotted using appropriate scales. The straight lines between the data points were drawn to add clarity to the
186
figures and do not represent a model. Zero on the vertical axis represents the approximate depth of the sediment surface.
187
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 12
188
Similarly, in the present study, the high porewater DOC concentration measured below −45 cm
189
was likely a remanence of the emergent vegetation found in the swamp. In contrast, the marsh
190
DOC concentration profiles exhibited a sharp DOC concentration peak near the sediment –
191
water interface, with maximum porewater DOC concentrations observed at −1 cm. The DOC
192
concentration peaks were 52 and 44 mg/L for Marsh-1 and Marsh-2, respectively. This increase
193
was followed by a sharp decrease down to −15 cm where DOC concentrations reached 24 and
194
23 mg/L for Marsh-1 and Marsh-2, respectively. In the remainder of the marsh vertical profile,
195
the DOC concentrations decreased gradually to less than 20 mg/L below −50 cm.
196
197
1.2 Redox geochemistry
198
No NO3− was detected in the sediment of both the swamp and the marsh. The reducing
199
conditions were therefore anoxic and past the NO3− reducing state. The swamp had lower
200
porewater concentrations of total Fe, < 13 mg/L, and total Mn, < 0.7 mg/L, than the marsh with
201
up to 52 and 7 mg/L of total Fe and total Mn, respectively (Figure 1). Consistent with these
202
ranges, the swamp also had higher SO42− concentrations, up to 2.7 mg/L, than the marsh, < 1.2
203
mg/L. These differences between the swamp and the marsh are typical of lower concentrations
204
of reduced species in the porewater of environments with fluctuating water tables.41 In both
205
the swamp and the marsh, the concentrations of the redox-sensitive species showed a peak
206
near or below the sediment – water interface. This peak was sharper in the marsh than in the
207
swamp, due to the swamp’s fluctuating water levels that translocated the elements to lower
208
depths.41,42
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 30
Page 13 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology 13
209
In Swamp-1, the downward increase in total Fe and Mn concentrations and the decrease in
210
SO42− concentrations occurred in parallel from the sediment – water interface down to −20 cm,
211
indicating concurrent reduction of SO42−, Fe(III), and Mn(III/IV). A similar pattern was found in
212
Swamp-2 except that the increase of total Fe was delayed until −10 cm, suggesting that the
213
reduction of Fe(III) occurred after that of SO42−. The reduction of SO42− concurrently or before Fe
214
is typically observed in environments with unavailable Fe, significant high concentrations of
215
DOC, or high concentrations of SO42−.14 This has been observed by others.14,43,44 The
216
concentrations of SO42− in the swamp were not elevated, < 2.7 mg/L, but the DOC
217
concentrations, ranging from 25 to 30 mg/L were high.45 It is hypothesized that the reduction of
218
SO42− concurrently with or before that of Fe in the top 20 cm of the swamp sediment could
219
have been caused by the unavailability of Fe due to its complexation with available DOC.45
220
Below −20 cm, the redoxamorphic profile was similar for the two peepers located in the
221
swamp: SO42− concentrations increased while total Fe and total Mn concentrations decreased.
222
In this −20 to −50 cm interval, SO42− concentrations averaged 1.0 ± 0.3 mg/L. This value is above
223
the threshold of 0.5 mg/L defined by Chapelle et al.,46 indicating that the sediments were likely
224
still in SO42− reducing conditions and not yet undergoing methanogenesis. The decrease in Fe
225
and Mn could indicate that the redox conditions in the wetland are past the reduction of the
226
oxyhydroxides, or that Fe and Mn are precipitating with sulfides forming insoluble species.47,48
227
The increase in total Fe and total Mn concentrations observed beyond −50 cm in Swamp-1 and
228
−45 cm in Swamp-2, could indicate a zone where the reduction of the oxyhydroxides is
229
occurring. Alternatively, since these increases correspond in scale and location with the
230
increase in DOC concentration for both peepers, the increase in total Fe and Mn concentrations
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 14
231
could be a result of resuspension of Fe(III) and Mn(III/IV) complexed with organic matter
232
colloids smaller than 0.22 µm, the peeper membrane pore size. Similar results were obtained
233
by Pullin and Cabaniss,49 who found that Fe(III) could be complexed by fulvic acids in anoxic
234
conditions.
235
In the marsh, the redoxamorphic conditions were consistent between the duplicate peepers.
236
Highly compressed redox gradients were observed at the sediment – water interface. Above
237
the sediment – water interface, SO42−, Fe(III), and Mn(III/IV) were reduced concurrently, with
238
rapidly changing concentrations of the redox-sensitive species overlapping a narrow vertical
239
interval. This reducing zone suggests that the 5 cm in the water column consisted of a floc-like
240
ooze layer as described by Kadlec et al.50 The ooze layer consists of a movable layer of loose
241
and unconsolidated sediments. The rapid microbial decomposition of algae-derived organic
242
matter in this 5-cm deep layer, confirmed by the downward increase in DOC concentration
243
could have promoted the observed anoxic conditions that led to the rapid reduction of SO42−,
244
Fe(III), and Mn(III/IV). This scenario was also observed by Baez-Cazull et al.,14 who attributed it
245
to a microzone of anaerobic conditions driven by dense suspended organic material. In the top
246
layer of the marsh sediment, from 0 to −5 cm, the sediments appeared to oxidize, i.e. they
247
became less anoxic, as the concentrations of total Fe and total Mn dropped while those of SO42−
248
increased, but NO3− concentrations were still below detection. The redox conditions stabilized
249
at −10 cm, where SO42− reducing conditions dominated. Similarly, as observed in the swamp,
250
the high concentration of DOC from −10 to −20 cm could have reduced the availability of the
251
oxyhydroxides contributing to the reduction of SO42− before that of Fe(III) and Mn(III/IV).
252
Between −20 and −40 cm, total Fe and total Mn concentrations increased suggesting the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 30
Page 15 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology 15
253
reduction of Fe(III) and Mn(III/IV). In this depth interval, the SO42− stabilised at 0.60 ± 0.07, close
254
to the threshold of 0.5 mg/L defined by Chapelle et al.46
255
Altogether, (i) the constant water level of the marsh compared to the fluctuating one in the
256
swamp, (ii) the higher porewater concentrations of total Fe and total Mn in the marsh than in
257
the swamp, (iii) the porewater Fe, Mn, and SO42− concentration profiles discussed above, and
258
(iv) the higher pH of the marsh (6.5 – 6.9) compared to the swamp (5.9 – 6.4) (SI Figure S6) all
259
point to the marsh sediments being in a more reduced state than the swamp sediments, and
260
potentially in methanogenesis.
261 262
1.3 Total dissolved strontium
263
The total dissolved Sr concentrations include the soluble Sr cation Sr2+ and any other Sr
264
complexes smaller than 0.22 µm. The porewater Sr concentrations were the highest at the
265
bottom of the sediment profiles, due to Sr-containing groundwater input in the two wetlands
266
(Figure 1). At the sediment – water interface of both locations, dissolved Sr concentrations
267
were low, < 0.06 mg/L except for Swamp-2, suggesting that the wetland sediments were able to
268
attenuate Sr and protect the overlaying surface water and benthic zone (0 to −20 cm) from Sr
269
contamination. The total porewater Sr concentrations exhibited a gradual downward increase
270
in the sediment of both locations, up to maximum concentrations of 0.19 mg/L in the swamp
271
and 0.37 mg/L in the marsh at the bottom of the profiles. While they increased significantly by
272
122% and 133% in Marsh-1 and Marsh-2, respectively, over the whole 60 cm length of the
273
marsh sediment profiles, in the swamp, total Sr concentrations only increased by 47% and 49%
274
in Swamp-1 and Swamp-2, respectively. A larger Sr concentration gradient was observed along
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 16
275
the whole sediment profile of the marsh, and in particular at the sediment – water interface.
276
This suggests that a faster upward diffusive transport of Sr to the wetland surface water was
277
occurring in the marsh compared to the swamp.
278
279
2. Sediments
280
2.1 Total organic carbon and total nitrogen
281
In the marsh, the TOC and TN concentrations were lower than in the swamp, consistent with
282
the open water of the sampling location in the marsh and the presence of dense vegetation in
283
the swamp. The TOC concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 13 % in the marsh and 15 to 24 % in the
284
swamp, while those of TN were in the range of 0.2 to 1.2 % in the marsh and 0.7 to 1.7 % in the
285
swamp (SI Figure S7).
286
Within each location, the three sediment cores showed a consistent general decreasing trend in
287
TOC concentrations, in line with the general porewater DOC concentration decrease observed
288
at both locations. This results from the decomposition of sediment organic matter throughout
289
the profile and an input of fresh organic material at the top of wetland sediments from the
290
swamp cattail litter and marsh algae. However, in one of the three cores collected in the
291
swamp, core A, an increase in TOC content was observed between −17.5 cm at 16% and −37.5
292
cm at 21%, likely due to the localized presence of organic material. There were no significant
293
changes in porewater DOC concentrations in any of the two swamp peepers at the
294
corresponding depths. It is possible that the peepers did not intersect the local organic material
295
found in core A. Alternatively, slower microbial activity, as indicated by the decrease in TN in
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 30
Page 17 of 30
Environmental Science & Technology 17
296
core A, could have limited the breakdown of the sediment TOC into more labile dissolved
297
organic molecules.
298
The molar TOC/TN ratios were 22 ± 4 and 12 ± 2 for the swamp and the marsh, respectively (SI
299
Figure S8). The different ratios are representative of the respective sources of soil nitrogen. For
300
both sediments, a portion of the nitrogen was from microbial origin, with an expected TOC/TN
301
ratio at approximately 6.51 The low TOC/TN ratio of the marsh can be explained by the low
302
TOC/TN ratio of algae, typically between 8 ± 2 52,53 and 12.54 In contrast, the higher TOC/TN
303
ratio of the swamp compared to the marsh was due to the contribution of the emergent
304
vegetation of the swamp. Indeed, typical TOC/TN ratios of emergent vegetation range from 45
305
to 50,54 with values up to 79 ± 14 for Typha species.53 The gradual downward increase in the
306
TOC:TN ratio of the swamp sediments (SI Figure S8) could be a result of a decrease in the
307
contribution of microbial-derived nitrogen resulting from lower microbial activity.
308 309
2.2 Solid-phase manganese and iron
310
The marsh sediments, on average, had higher concentrations of Fe, by 27%, and Mn, by 76%,
311
than the swamp sediments (SI Figure S7). This is consistent with the observed swamp and
312
marsh porewater Fe and Mn concentrations, which were higher in the marsh than in the
313
swamp, by a factor of 4 and 10, respectively. Characteristic of the reduced environment, the
314
total Mn concentrations decreased with depth in both the swamp and the marsh: from 0.53 ±
315
0.06 to 0.25 ± 0.04 mg/g in the marsh, and 0.27 ± 0.03 to 0.14 ± 0.02 mg/g in the swamp. Unlike
316
Mn depletion, Fe depletion did not start at the sediment – water interface. Rather, the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology 18
317
downward decrease in Fe concentrations started between −12.5 and −22.5 cm in the swamp,
318
and between −17.5 and −47.5 cm in the marsh.
319 320
2.3 Cation exchange capacity
321
In general, the CEC decreased downward in the marsh and increased downward in the swamp
322
(SI Figure S7). The marsh CEC decrease with depth was linearly correlated with the decrease in
323
TOC content with an R2 value of 0.87; whereas, the swamp CEC and TOC content did not
324
correlate. The particle size distribution analysis revealed that neither the swamp nor the marsh
325
had significant clay content (particle size diameter < 2 μm) (SI Figure S5). However, the marsh,
326
classified as a silt loam, had finer particles than the swamp, whose texture was sandy loam. At
327
both locations, the particle size distribution drifted towards finer particle sizes with increasing
328
depth. This suggests that the main contributor to CEC was the organic matter, as also found by
329
Helling et al.55 It is likely that the higher CEC observed in the swamp was a result of the higher
330
TOC content, between 15 and 25%, than in the marsh where the concentration in TOC was
331