Blue Tandem Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes

Dec 18, 2017 - Investment flows at J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference. The J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference in early January has traditionally been th...
20 downloads 19 Views 3MB Size
www.acsnano.org

Efficient Red/Green/Blue Tandem Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes with External Quantum Efficiency Exceeding 21% Heng Zhang, Shuming Chen,* and Xiao Wei Sun Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, People’s Republic of China S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: Highly efficient tandem quantum-dot lightemitting diodes (QLEDs) are developed by using an interconnecting layer (ICL) with the structure of ZnMgO/Al/ HATCN/MoO3. The developed ICL exhibits high transparency, efficient charge generation/injection capability, and high robustness to resist solvent damage during deposition of the upper functional layers. With the proposed ICL, full color (red/green/blue, R/G/B) tandem QLEDs are demonstrated with extremely high current efficiency and external quantum efficiency (EQE): 17.9 cd/A and 21.4% for B-QLEDs, 121.5 cd/A and 27.6% for G-QLEDs, 41.5 cd/A and 23.1% for R-QLEDs. To the best of our knowledge, these are the highest values ever reported. In addition, the EQEs of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs all exceed 21%. The high efficiency can be well maintained over a wide range of luminance from 102 to 104 cd/m2. For example, even at a high brightness of 20 000 cd/m2, the EQE of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs can still sustain its 96%, 99%, and 78% maximum value, respectively. The demonstrated full-color tandem QLEDs, with extremely high efficiency, long operational lifetime, low roll-off efficiency, and high color purity, would be ideal candidates to bring QLEDs into the next generation of full-color displays and the solid-state lighting market. KEYWORDS: quantum dot, light-emitting diodes, tandem structure, interconnecting layer, high efficiency

T

transparent interconnecting layer (ICL). Since the same current passes two or more EL units, the CE/EQE of tandem LEDs are two or more times higher than those of the single devices.13,14 The higher CE means that at a certain luminance the tandem devices can be operated at a much lower current density, which is beneficial for their operational lifetime. Therefore, tandem structures have been widely adopted in various optoelectronic devices such as OLEDs or solar cells.13−17 However, there are few reports on tandem QLEDs due to the challenges of developing (1) efficient and robust ICLs and (2) multiple solution-deposition processes.2,18,19 We recently reported inverted tandem QLEDs with a CE of 71 cd/A and an EQE of 16.76% by using PEDOT:PSS/ZnMgO as the ICL (PEDOT:PSS = poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/polystyrenesulfonate).2 Although the solution-processed PEDOT:PSS/ ZnMgO is a good ICL for the tandem devices, the inverted structure is somehow problematic. For one thing, in inverted

he optical and chemical properties of colloidal quantum dots (QDs), which include tunable emission color, narrow spectra line width, high material stability, and simple solution processability, make them very attractive for use in light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for next-generation displays and lighting application.1−7 Since the first introduction of quantum-dot LEDs (QLEDs), great progress has been made over the past few years due to the rapid development of QD materials and device architectures.1,2 However, even though the materials and the devices have been improved greatly, the performances such as the efficiency and the lifetime of QLEDs are still lower than those of their competitors: organic LEDs (OLEDs). For example, external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) > 20% have been routinely reported in OLEDs,8−10 whereas it is still rarely reported in QLEDs. Particularly, the efficiency and the lifetime of blue QLEDs are significantly lower than those of their OLED counterpart, which is a big concern for their future commercialization.6,11,12 One of the promising ways to simultaneously achieve high current efficiency (CE) and long operational lifetime is to employ tandem structures. In tandem devices, two or more electroluminescent (EL) units are serially connected via a © 2017 American Chemical Society

Received: November 6, 2017 Accepted: December 18, 2017 Published: December 18, 2017 697

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07867 ACS Nano 2018, 12, 697−704

Article

Cite This: ACS Nano 2018, 12, 697−704

Article

ACS Nano

Moreover, an ultrathin Al layer is inserted between the n-type and the p-type materials to further enhance the electrical performance of the ICL. The resultant ICL with the structure ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 exhibits high transparency, efficient charge generation/injection capability, and high robustness to resist solvent damage during deposition of the upper functional layers. With the proposed ICL, full-color (red/green/blue, R/G/B) tandem QLEDs are demonstrated with extremely high CEs (EQEs): 17.9 cd/A (21.4%) for B-QLEDs, 121.5 cd/A (27.6%) for G-QLEDs, and 41.5 cd/A (23.1%) for R-QLEDs. To the best of our knowledge, these are the highest values ever reported. In addition, this is also the first report where the EQEs of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs all exceed 21%. The demonstrated full-color tandem QLEDs, with extremely high efficiency, low roll-off efficiency, and high color purity, would be ideal candidates to bring QLEDs into the next generation of full-color displays and the solid-state lighting market.

structures, the QD-emitting layer is easily damaged by the solvent during deposition of the upper functional layers, thereby resulting in a relatively low CE (EQE) of 71 cd/A (16.76%).2 For another, for display application, the inverted devices can only work with n-type thin-film transistors (TFTs), which are unstable, especially the metal-oxide TFTs.20,21 Therefore, to further improve the performance and to make them compatible with p-type TFTs, it is necessary to develop tandem QLEDs with conventional noninverted structures. QLEDs with conventional structures can be fabricated by an all-solution process without sacrificing efficiency and thus have been widely reported.1,5 To serially connect two QLEDs, an ICL that can efficiently generate/inject charge carriers is one of the key challenges. However, there are no reported ICLs that can be used in noninverted tandem QLEDs. Previously, we demonstrated that PEDOT:PSS/ZnMgO is an ideal ICL for inverted devices,2 and thus, one may wonder whether the reversed film sequence ZnMgO/PEDOT:PSS is a good ICL for noninverted tandem QLEDs. To answer this question, very recently, we demonstrated white tandem QLEDs by using ZnMgO/PEDOT:PSS as an ICL, but the device efficiency is lower than the theoretical value, indicating that ZnMgO/ PEDOT:PSS is a problematic ICL for the noninverted QLEDs.19 This is because it is difficult to deposit the aqueous PEDOT:PSS on the ZnMgO, which is hydrophobic. As shown in Figure S1(a)−(c), the nonuniform distribution of the PEDOT:PSS can be observed, which is mainly due to the relatively large contact angle (57.5°) of the PEDOT:PSS on ZnMgO. Although the contact angle can be further reduced by adding isopropyl alcohol (IPA) into PEDOT:PSS, the deposited film still exhibits very poor uniformity and quality, as shown in Figure S1(g)−(l). On the contrary, one can easily deposit ZnMgO on top of PEDOT:PSS, as shown in Figure S1(d)−(f), and thus PEDOT:PSS/ZnMgO is a good ICL for inverted devices, whereas the reverse ZnMgO/PEDOT:PSS cannot work as an ICL for noninverted QLEDs. In this work, we specifically develop an efficient ICL that can be used for noninverted tandem QLEDs. From the aforementioned discussion, the commonly used PEDOT:PSS cannot serve as a p-type material for the ICL. Therefore, herein we adopt the evaporated small-molecule HATCN (dipyrazino[2,3-f:2′,3′-h]quinoxaline-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexacarbonitrile) and metal oxide MoO3 as a substitute for PEDOT:PSS.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Figure 1(a) shows the device structures of the single and the tandem QLEDs. For tandem devices, two QLEDs are serially connected via the transparent ICL with the structure ZnMgO/ Al/HATCN/MoO3. All layers except the Al, the HATCN, and the MoO3 were fabricated by spin-casting. To protect the HATCN from dissolving by the solvents of the upper functional layers, a 12 nm MoO3 layer was deposited on top of HATCN. To investigate whether all functional layers still survive after multiple solution processing, the cross-sectional transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images of the tandem QLEDs were taken. As shown in Figure 1(b), all functional layers including the ultrathin (∼3 nm) Al can be clearly observed, which confirms the existence of all layers even after treatment by various solvents for many times. Figure 1(c) shows the energy band diagrams of the tandem QLEDs. Because of the well-aligned energy levels, the proposed ICL is expected to efficiently generate and inject carriers to the bottom and the top QLEDs under forward bias. The performance of the tandem devices is largely affected by the electrical and the optical properties of the ICL. We propose four ICLs with structures (i) ZnMgO/MoO3, (ii) ZnMgO/ HATCN/MoO3, (iii) ZnMgO/Al/MoO3, and (iv) ZnMgO/ Al/HATCH/MoO3, where ZnMgO nanoparticles were chosen as electron transport material due to its high electron mobility

Figure 1. (a) Schematic device structure of bottom single QLEDs, top single QLEDs, and tandem QLEDs. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of the tandem QLEDs. (c) Energy band diagram of the tandem QLEDs.2,4,22,23 An ICL based on ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 is used to connect the two individual QLEDs. 698

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07867 ACS Nano 2018, 12, 697−704

Article

ACS Nano

Figure 2. (a) J−V characteristics of the ICL-only devices with different ICLs; (b) J−V characteristics of the tandem devices with different ICLs: ZnMgO/MoO3, ZnMgO/HATCN/MoO3, ZnMgO/Al/MoO3, and ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3; (c) J−V characteristics of the ICL-only devices, ICL: ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 with Al thickness varied from 1 to 5 nm; (d) transmittance spectra of the ICL: ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 with an Al thickness varied from 1 to 5 nm; (e) transmittance and absorbance spectra of the ICL (ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3) before and after CB rinsing; (f) PL spectra of the G-QDs covered with an ICL (ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3) before and after CB rinsing.

and matched conduction band level with that of QDs,2 and MoO3 was chosen as hole injection material because of its high work function.7 To evaluate the charge generation capability of the ICL, ICL-only devices with structures (i) ITO/ZnMgO/ MoO3/PVK/Al, (ii) ITO/ZnMgO/HATCN/MoO3/PVK/Al, (iii) ITO/ZnMgO/Al/MoO3/PVK/Al, and (iv) ITO/ZnMgO/ Al/HATCN/MoO3/PVK/Al were fabricated (PVK = poly(9vinlycarbazole), where ITO and Al work as the anode and cathode, respectively. Figure 2(a) displays the current density− voltage (J−V) characteristics of the ICL-only devices. Under forward bias, charge carriers are generated from the ICL and ultimately are extracted by the electrodes, whereas under reverse bias charge carriers are injected from the electrodes and finally are quenched by the ICL. Under forward bias, charge carriers cannot be efficiently injected from the electrodes due to the high injection barrier; thus the forward current solely reflects the charge generation capability of the ICL. It is obvious that device (iv) exhibits the largest forward current, indicating that with ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 the charge generation and transportation are the most efficient. The ultrathin Al and the HATCN play an important role in enhancing the charge generation and transportation. As shown in Figure 1(c), the charge carriers are generated at the interface of MoO3/PVK, where electrons from the HOMO of PVK can efficiently transfer to the conduction band of MoO3 due to their aligned energy level. Under forward bias, the electrons can further transport to the LUMO of HATCN and Al and finally inject from Al to ZnMgO. The ultrathin Al and the HATCN work as energy ladders so that the generated electrons can stepwisely transport from the MoO3 to the ZnMgO. In addition, the holes can also be efficiently injected from MoO3 to PVK by continuously extracting the electrons from the HOMO of PVK and subsequently transporting the electrons to the ZnMgO. To evaluate whether the ICL can work normally, tandem QLEDs were fabricated, and their J−V−L characteristics are displayed in Figure 2(b) and Figure S2. As expected, devices with a ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 ICL exhibit the largest

forward current, the lowest turn-on voltage, and the highest efficiency. Without Al or HATCN, the injection of the charge carriers is difficult due to the high injection barrier, and this thus leads to a high turn-on voltage and a low efficiency. For example, for devices with a ZnMgO/MoO3 ICL, the turn-on voltage for 1 cd/m2 is 21 V, whereas by inserting ultrathin Al between ZnMgO and MoO3, the turn-on voltage is reduced to 13 V, and by further using HTACN, the turn-on voltage is effectively decreased to 6 V. Through comparison, we identify that ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 is the most efficient ICL for the tandem QLEDs. The thickness of the ultrathin Al can largely affect the electrical and the optical properties of the ICL. The J−V characteristics and the transmittance spectra of the ICL-only devices with Al thickness varied from 1 to 5 nm are shown in Figure 2(c) and (d), respectively. With only 1 nm Al, the current density is greatly improved due to the enhanced electron injection by using the ultrathin Al as the energy ladder. The current density is further increased by increasing the thickness of Al. This is because the resistivity of the ultrathin Al is influenced by its thickness.24 It has been found that the ultrathin metal film consists of discontinuous islands. By increasing the thickness, the islands are coalesced, leading to the formation of a continuous film and thus resulting in a reduced resistance.24,25 However, the transmittance of the ICL is significantly decreased as the Al thickness increases. The transmittance of the ICL also has a great impact on the performance of the tandem devices. Therefore, to make a good balance, the optimal thickness of the Al is chosen as 3 nm, which can guarantee a moderate charge generation/injection as well as a high transmittance of ∼80%. To examine whether the ultrathin Al or the small molecular HATCN layer is damaged by the solvent (chlorobenzene, CB) of the PVK, the transmittance and the absorbance spectra of the ICL treated by CB were measured. As shown in Figure 2(e), after CB rinsing, the intensities of the transmittance and the absorbance of the ICL are identical with those of the ICL 699

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07867 ACS Nano 2018, 12, 697−704

Article

ACS Nano

maximum CE of 53.7 cd/A, which is relatively poorer than 3.4 V and 63.3 cd/A of the bottom G-QLEDs. This is because the top QLEDs use HATCN/MoO3 as the hole injection layer (HIL), resulting in a relatively inefficient hole injection as compared with the bottom QLEDs, which adopt PEDOT:PSS as the HIL. Although both PEDOT:PSS and MoO3 have similar work functions, the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS is higher than that of MoO3, and thus the hole injection of the bottom devices is more efficient than that of the top devices. For the tandem QLEDs, the efficiencies (and the driving voltage) are nearly equal to the sum of those of the bottom and the top QLEDs, indicating that the ICL can effectively connect the bottom and top QLEDs. More specifically, the ICL can efficiently generate charge carriers and inject them to the bottom and top QLEDs. Due to the efficient connection, very impressive CEs and EQEs are achieved, 17.9 cd/A and 21.4% for B-QLEDs, 121.5 cd/A and 27.6% for G-QLEDs, and 41.5 cd/A and 23.1% for R-QLEDs, which, to the best of our knowledge, are the highest values ever reported. Especially, the EQE of B-QLEDs is significantly higher than those reported in the literature,12,25 which exceeds 20%. The power efficiency (PE)−J characteristics of all devices are depicted in Figure S4, and the detailed device performances are summarized in Table 1. As listed in Table 1, the efficiencies of the tandem devices are even higher than the sum of those of the bottom and top QLEDs, indicating that the charge injection from the ICL is even more efficient than that from the electrodes. The higher EQE indicates that the devices may have a longer operational lifetime, since at a certain brightness the tandem devices can be operated at a much smaller current density. We have measured the lifetime of the fabricated QLEDs. The devices were simply encapsulated by a glass cover and a UV epoxy in a N2 glovebox. As shown in Figure S5, the lifetime of the tandem devices is significantly longer than that of the

before rinsing, indicating that the ultrathin Al and the HATCN remain intact. Since the evaporated HATCN can be easily damaged by the solvents, the intact HATCN shown here thereby indicates that the MoO3 can effectively protect the HATCN from damage by the solvents. For tandem QLEDs, one of the challenges is that the bottom QD layer is easily damaged during deposition of the upper layers, because it is subjected to various solvent treatments many times.2,18,19 Fortunately, our robust ICL can effectively protect the bottom QD layer from damage by the solvents. As shown in Figure 2(f), before and after CB rinsing, the photoluminescence (PL) intensities of the QD layer coated with ICL are nearly identical, indicating that the ICL can effectively resist the penetration of the solvents and thus protect the QD layer from damage by the solvents. The excellent electrical and optical properties of the ZnMgO/Al/HATCN/MoO3 ICL prompt us to further explore its application in tandem QLEDs. Full-color tandem QLEDs were fabricated with the structure glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS (45 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/QDs (R/G/B)/ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (3 nm)/HATCN (15 nm)/MoO3 (12 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/ QDs (R/G/B)/ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (100 nm). For comparison, the bottom single QLED with the structure glass/ITO/ PEDOT:PSS (45 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/QDs (R/G/B)/ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (100 nm) and the top single QLED with the structure glass/ITO/HATCN (15 nm)/MoO3 (12 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/QDs (R/G/B)/ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (100 nm) were also fabricated. The J−V, L−V, and CE−J−EQE characteristics of the devices are shown in Figure 3, respectively. The J−V characteristics of the devices with the current density plotted in log scale are also shown in Figure S3. The top QLEDs exhibit relatively poor performances such as higher driving voltage and lower efficiency than those of the bottom QLEDs. For example, the top G-QLEDs exhibit a turn-on voltage of 4 V and a

Figure 3. J−V characteristics, L−V characteristics, and CE−J−EQE characteristics of the (a−c) blue QLEDs, (d−f) green QLEDs, and (g−i) red QLEDs. 700

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07867 ACS Nano 2018, 12, 697−704

Article

ACS Nano Table 1. Device Performances of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs CE (cd/A)

EQE (%)

PE (lm/W)

color

device

Von (V)

250/2500/25000 (cd/m2)

max

250/2500/25000 (cd/m2)

max

250/2500/25000 (cd/m2)

max

blue

bottom top tandem bottom top tandem bottom top tandem

4.4 4.7 8.8 3.4 4.0 6.1 2.4 3.9 5.6

4.9/7.1/6.8 5.9/7.6/6.0 17.6/17.5/12.0 21.88/52.5/61.27 30.0/46.4/53.3 93.1/117.9/120.5 8.7/17.9/23.0 8.7/13.6/15.8 37.9/41.2/39.6

7.7 7.6 17.9 63.3 53.7 121.5 23.5 15.8 41.5

6.1/8.8/8.5 7.3/9.4/7.4 21.1/21.0/14.3 5.0/12.0/14.0 6.7/10.7/12.3 21.2/26.8/27.4 5.5/11.2/14.5 5.4/8.4/9.8 21.1/23.0/22.0

9.6 9.4 21.4 14.5 12.4 27.6 14.8 9.8 23.1

2.6/3.3/2.3 2.5/2.3/1.1 3.9/3.0/1.4 29.4/33.0/30.5 14.2/17.0/13.7 30.5/29.9/23.4 8.1/12.3/10.8 3.8/3.9/3.0 9.5/7.4/5.0

3.3 2.6 4.2 33.6 17.1 31.8 12.4 4.1 11.1

green

red

Figure 4. (a) Histogram of maximum CEs of 24 tandem G-QLEDs from different batches. (b) Normalized EL spectra of the R-, G-, and B-QLEDs. (c) CIE coordinates of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs. (d) Photos of the tandem R-, G-, and B-QLEDs operated at a current density of 100 mA/cm2.

shown in Figure S6. Figure 4(b) shows the normalized EL spectra of all devices. The spectra of the tandem devices are identical with those of the bottom and the top QLEDs. The devices exhibit a central wavelength of 474, 534, and 622 nm, with a full width at half-maximum (fwhm) of 28, 29, and 27 nm for the B-, G-, and R-QLEDs, respectively. Due to their narrow fwhm, the CIE coordinates are almost located at the edge of the color chart, indicating their emission colors are highly saturated, as shown in Figure 4(c). The EL spectra of the tandem devices viewed at different angles were also investigated. As shown in Figure S7, the spectra are almost unchanged when viewed at different angles. This is because our ICL is highly transparent, which helps to suppress the microcavity effect. Figure 4(d) displays photos of the tandem B-, G-, and R-QLEDs operated at a current density of ∼100 mA/cm2. Very bright and uniform emission can be observed. The demonstrated tandem devices with high brightness of more than 26 800, 115 500, and 65 900 cd/m2 for B-, G-, and R-QLEDs, respectively, can also find a wide variety of applications in the lighting area. Figure 5 shows the evolution of the QLED efficiency since 1994.1,3−6,8,23,27−56 To the best of our knowledge, the EQEs of our developed full-color tandem QLEDs are the highest.

single devices. For example, when driven at a constant current of 0.3 mA under ambient conditions, the half-lifetimes, T50, of the green bottom QLEDs and the green top QLEDs are 50.3 and 28.5 h at an initial luminance (L0) of 2200 and 1916 cd/m2, respectively. However, the T50 of green tandem QLEDs is longer than 220 h at a higher initial luminance of 3911 cd/m2. Moreover, after the initial fast decay, the tandem devices exhibit a positive aging effect; that is, the luminance is increased over time. This is because the efficiency of QLEDs encapsulated with a UV-curable acidic resin will increase during the storage time.26 The detailed mechanisms are still under investigation. By using the relation L0nT = constant and assuming an acceleration factor of n = 1.5,1,4 the T50 of the tandem QLEDs at 100 cd/m2 is predicted to be more than 53 808 h, which is significantly longer than 5190 h (T50) and 2390 h (T50) for the bottom QLEDs and the top QLEDs, respectively. To examine whether such high performances are repeatable, more than 24 G-QLEDs from different batches were fabricated, and their CEs are depicted in Figure 4(a). These devices exhibit a mean CE of 108 cd/A with a low standard deviation of 5.8, indicating the performances are highly repeatable. The corresponding histogram of the EQE of these devices is 701

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07867 ACS Nano 2018, 12, 697−704

Article

ACS Nano

Device Fabrication. The ITO substrates (sheet resistance = 25 Ω sq−1) were first cleaned in ultrasonic detergent for 30 min and sprayed by deionized water, followed by soaking in ultrasonic deionized water for 15 min and baking in an oven for 30 min. Then they were cleaned with a UV-ozone cleaner for 30 min prior to spin-casting processes. The spin-casting processes were performed in air. After UV-ozone treatment, the PEDOT:PSS (Clevios AI 4083) hole injection layer was spin-coated at 2000 rpm and baked at 130 °C for 15 min in air, sequentially. Then the PVK (10 mg/mL in chlorobenzene) hole transport layer was coated at 4000 rpm for 40 s and annealed at 110 °C for 10 min. For the different color (R/G/B) QLEDs’ fabrication, the 15 mg/mL R-QD (CdZnSe/ZnS/OT, core and shell ∼12.2 nm, obtained from Mesolight Inc., QY ∼85%), 10 mg/mL G-QD (CdZnSeS/ZnS/oleic acid, core and shell ∼11.6 nm, obtained from Mesolight Inc., QY ∼85%), and 10 mg/mL B-QDs (CdZnSeS/ZnS/OT, core and shell ∼10.5 nm, obtained from Mesolight Inc., QY ∼85%) dissoved in hexane solution were spincoated at 3500 rpm, 3000, and 1500 rpm for 40 s, respectively, followed by baking at 100 °C for 5 min. The commercially obtained ZnMgO (purchased from Guangdong Poly Optoelectronics Co., Ltd.) nanoparticles were spin-coated on the QD layer at 2500 rpm from a 30 mg/mL ethanol solution and baked at 90 °C for 10 min. The TEM images of the ZnMgO nanoparticles are shown in our previous work (ref 57), and the dc conductivity of the ZnMgO is ∼10−7 S/cm.58 After that, the samples were transferred to a high-vacuum evaporation chamber to sequentially deposit Al (3 nm), HATCN (15 nm), and MoO3 (12 nm) at a base pressure of 5 × 10−4 Pa. The subsequent solution-processed functional layers including PVK, QDs (red, green, and blue), and ZnMgO were all sequentially deposited with the same fabrication conditions as before except the annealing conditions, which were fixed at 90 °C for 5 min. Finally, a 100 nm Al cathode was evaporated in a high-vacuum evaporation chamber at a base pressure of 5 × 10−4 Pa. Device Characterizations. The cross-sectional TEM images of the tandem QLEDs were characterized via high-resolution (HR)-TEM (FE-HR-TEM, JEOL-2100F), and the samples were sliced using a focused ion beam (FIB) system (Dual-Beam FIB, SEIKO SMI3050SE). The thicknesses of all the solution-processed films were measured by a Bruker DektakXT Stylus Profiler. The evaporation rates and the thicknesses of HATCN, MoO3, and Al were in situ monitored by a quartz crystal microbalance. The measurement results were further calibrated by a Bruker DektakXT Stylus Profiler. The thickness of all functional layers can also be estimated from the TEM image. Transmittances of the ICL were measured using a 150 mm integrating sphere coupled with a Cary 5000 UV−vis−NIR spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies). The angular-dependent EL spectra were measured using a Keithley 2614B programmable source meter, a rotating stage, and a PR670 spectrometer. The active area of the devices was 2 × 2 mm2. The EQE was measured by using a method recommended by Stephen R. Forrest.3,59,60 For the setup of the system and measurement steps, refer to ref 60. The current density−voltage− luminance (J−V−L) characteristics of the devices were measured by a dual-channel Keithley 2614B source meter unit and a calibriated PIN-25D silicon photodiode.

Figure 5. Evolution of the EQEs of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs.1,3−6,8,23,27−56 Most data are based on Cd-based QLEDs. The EQEs of our tandem R-, G-, and B-QLEDs all exceed 21%.

Moreover, this is also the first report in which the EQEs of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs all exceed 21%. Furthermore, the efficiency of our tandem QLEDs only slightly rolls off and can still maintain a very high value even when operated at a high luminance. For example, even at a high brightness of 20 000 cd/m2, the CEs/EQEs of R-, G-, and B-QLEDs can still sustain their 96%, 99%, and 78% maximum values, respectively. The demonstrated full-color tandem QLEDs with high efficiency, high color saturation, and low roll-off efficiency would be a strong competitor for OLEDs for next-generation display applications.

CONCLUSIONS In summary, highly efficient noninverted tandem QLEDs have been developed by using an ICL based on ZnMgO/ Al/HATCN/MoO3. The ultrathin Al and HATCN work as energy ladders for enhancing the charge transportation of the ICL. The ICL is also highly robust, which can effectively protect the bottom QD layer from damage by the solvents. With the proposed ICL, the tandem QLEDs exhibit extremely high CEs (EQEs), 17.9 cd/A (21.4%) for B-QLEDs, 121.5 cd/A (27.6%) for G-QLEDs and 41.5 cd/A (23.1%) for R-QLEDs, which, to the best of our knowledge, are the highest values ever reported. This work demonstrates that it is a good strategy to boost the performances particularly the CE and EQE of QLEDs by using our developed ICL. The demonstrated full-color tandem QLEDs, with extremely high efficiency, long operational lifetime, low roll-off efficiency, and high color purity, would be ideal candidates to bring QLEDs into the next generation of full-color displays and the solid-state lighting market.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07867. Contact angle and microscopic images of “PEDOT:PSS droplet on ZnMgO” and “ZnMgO droplet on PEDOT:PSS”, device characteristics of the QLEDs with different ICLs, current density−voltage and power efficiency−current density characteristics of the devices, lifetime data of the devices, histogram of maximum EQE of green tandem QLEDs, and angular EL spectra of the tandem QLEDs (PDF)

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Device Structures. Noninverted tandem QLEDs with a structure of glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS (45 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/QDs (R/G/B)/ ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (3 nm)/HATCN (15 nm)/MoO3 (12 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/QDs (R/G/B)/ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (100 nm) were fabricated. For comparison, the bottom single QLED with the structure glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS (45 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/QDs (R/G/B)/ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (100 nm) and the top single QLED with the structure glass/ITO/HATCN (15 nm)/MoO3 (12 nm)/PVK (30 nm)/QDs (R/G/B)/ZnMgO (40 nm)/Al (100 nm) were also fabricated. 702

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07867 ACS Nano 2018, 12, 697−704

Article

ACS Nano

(13) Chiba, T.; Pu, Y.-J.; Kido, J. Solution-Processed White Phosphorescent Tandem Organic Light-Emitting Devices. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 4681−4687. (14) Liao, L.-S.; Slusarek, W. K.; Hatwar, T. K.; Ricks, M. L.; Comfort, D. L. Tandem Organic Light-Emitting Diode using Hexaazatriphenylene Hexacarbonitrile in the Intermediate Connector. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 324−329. (15) Yang, J.-P.; Xiao, Y.; Deng, Y.-H.; Duhm, S.; Ueno, N.; Lee, S.T.; Li, Y.-Q.; Tang, J.-X. Electric-Field-Assisted Charge Generation and Separation Process in Transition Metal Oxide-Based Interconnectors for Tandem Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 600−608. (16) Gevaerts, V. S.; Furlan, A.; Wienk, M. M.; Turbiez, M.; Janssen, R. A. J. Solution Processed Polymer Tandem Solar Cell Using Efficient Small and Wide bandgap Polymer:Fullerene Blends. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2130−2134. (17) You, J.; Dou, L.; Yoshimura, K.; Kato, T.; Ohya, K.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Chen, C.-C.; Gao, J.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. A Polymer Tandem Solar Cell with 10.6% Power Conversion Efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1446. (18) Kim, H.-M.; Lee, J.; Hwang, E.; Kim, J.; Jang, J. Inverted Tandem Architecture of Quantum-dot Light Emitting Diodes with Solution Processed Charge Generation Layers. Dig. Tech. Pap. - Soc. Inf. Disp. Int. Symp. 2016, 47, 1480−1483. (19) Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Sun, X.; Chen, S. All Solution-Processed White Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes with Three-Unit Tandem Structure. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2017, 25, 143−150. (20) Ye, R.; Baba, M.; Oishi, Y.; Mori, K.; Suzuki, K. Air-Stable Ambipolar Organic Thin-Film Transistors Based on an Organic Homostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 253505. (21) Chikamatsu, M.; Itakura, A.; Yoshida, Y.; Azumi, R.; Yase, K. High-Performance n-Type Organic Thin-Film Transistors Based on Solution-Processable Perfluoroalkyl-Substituted C60 Derivatives. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 7365−7367. (22) Meyer, J.; Khalandovsky, R.; Görrn, P.; Kahn, A. MoO3 Films Spin-Coated from a Nanoparticle Suspension for Efficient HoleInjection in Organic Electronics. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 70−73. (23) Kim, H.-M.; Geng, D.; Kim, J.; Hwang, E.; Jang, J. Metal-Oxide Stacked Electron Transport Layer for Highly Efficient Inverted Quantum-Dot Light Emitting Diodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28727−28736. (24) Liu, H.-D.; Zhao, Y.-P.; Ramanath, G.; Murarka, S. P.; Wang, G.C. Thickness Dependent Electrical Resistivity of Ultrathin (