Business Isn't Scared by Peace - C&EN Global Enterprise (ACS

At industry and trade association meetings we have attended during the past few ... to be at least one paper or address by an economist who talks of r...
0 downloads 0 Views 141KB Size
Business Isn't Scared b y

Peace

C H. GREENEWALT, President, E. i. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

A t industry and t r a d e association meetings w e have a t t e n d e d during the past f e w months there a l w a y s seems to b e at least one p a p e r or address b y an economist who talks of recession, or even depression. These gloomy individuals see all kinds of pitfalls a h e a d , and if business leaders took them seriously we would all c r a w l into our shells and w a i t for the worst. Fortunately most industrial and business leaders a r e optimistic a n d see g r e a t opportunities in the future. An e x a m p l e is President C r a w f o r d H. G r e e n e w a l t of Du Pont. Recently he was asked b y Financial Editor E. S. Banks of the Philadelphia Inquirer to write a guest column. Greenewalt put into words w h a t w e would like t o have said on many occasions as w e sat listening to the economists dispense gloom. W i t h the permission of the Philadelphia Inquirer we a r e reprinting his guest column.—The Editors U X P E R I E N C E has shown us t h e futility of speculation on the specific physical s h a p e of the future. W h a t we do know, however ( a n d it is quite e n o u g h ) , is that the horizons are limitless and that if t h e vigor of our scientific establishment can be m a i n tained, it will carry us fax beyond anything w e can now foresee. Many of those who have presumed to predetermine the accomplishments of succeeding generations have turned out to b e rank pessimists. Jules Verne, the early science-fiction king, lived to see his o w n fantasies become other men's creations. T h e imaginings of Edgar Rice Burroughs, whose works intrigued rne as *» b o y , a p pear in some respects to have been highly conservative. I recall, for example, his tales of Martian aircraft that could travel at the unheard-of speed of 400 miles an hour! Even Benjamin Franklin, certainly a more eminent scientist and philosopher than either Verne or Burroughs, made t h e remarkably bad guess that settlement of the .American continent would require several centuries. Despite this historical example, w e still have our prophets and many of them still tend toward the pessimistic. After t h e second world w a r , there were grave warnings that t h e bottom would drop out of things with t h e end of war business. W h a t these forecasters failed to recognize was t h e dynamic nature of our economy. They h a d assumed that we would go b a c k to prewar standards, with normal d e m a n d established at prewar levels, whereas actually business went ahead with new plants and n e w products to meet new consumer demand—all unrelated to earlier experience. W a r !s a C a l a m i t y t o Business In recent months, w e have seen a n e w outbreak of gloomy forecasts, based on t h e economic effect of pence in Korea. Underlying much of it is t h e fear that business 3742

will face h a r d going, once the p r o p of an active defense program is withdrawn. It has even b e e n t a g g e d in the financial h e a d lines as " p e a c e scare," with solemn w a r n ings that Government must continue its spending p r o g r a m lest the economy collapse. If we a r e to believe that business will suffer through p e a c e , t h e n w e must believe that business gains through war. Nothing, of course, could b e further removed from t h e fact. W a r is a calamity to business as it is to t h e nation generally. T o look only at t h e financial side, w a r is terrifyingly expensive and t h e share of its cost b o r n e b y business is very substantial. Since t h e Korean w a r b e g a n , for example, the D u Pont Co.'s a v e r a g e return on its investm e n t has fallen off nearly one-quarter b e low the average of t h e three preceding years. T h i s roughly parallels t h e experience of t h e second world w a r w h e n earnings d r o p p e d 2 1 % below p r e w a r levels. T h e future is m o r t g a g e d : research and d e velopment are delayed and interrupted; personnel is diverted from creative pursuits to t h e t a u t necessities of the m o m e n t . Clearly, those w h o see war as a business blessing have no talent for simple arithmetic. Business Will Gain If Government Spending Drops Business isn't scared b y peace. It is scared b y t h e intimation t h a t peace c a n h a v e undesirable economic consequences. It is aghast, also, at t h e belief that Government should step in and create an artificial d e m a n d for goods to k e e p things going. Business has far m o r e to gain from a d r o p in government spending t h a n it has to lose. At present, according to figures I h a v e seen, w e are turning o u t a gross national product of about $360 billion a year. S o m e $50 billion, or about 1 4 % , represent g j v ernment purchases. B u t the government C H E M I C A L

p r o g r a m rides piggy-back; a very large p o r t i o n of its cost comes out of wages and salaries and dividends and corporate earnings, which, if u n b u r d e n e d , would flow into the n o r m a l channels of t r a d e . It w o u l d be s p e n t for additional consumer goods. It w o u l d b e available for investm e n t in n e w enterprise. It w o u l d bring a b o u t lower prices w h i c h would themselves stimulate d e m a n d . T h e s e are the creative m e t h o d s t h r o u g h w h i c h our business and industrial system progresses. T h e r e is, in m y opinion, n o m o r e reason . to credit current pessimism than t h e r e was to t a k e to t h e woods in 1945. Any assumption that business is u n e q u a l to t h e tasks of p e a c e d o e s a disservice e q u a l to a c h a r g e that it is u n e q u a l to t h e task of war. T h e record would indicate, I submit, that it is fully e q u a l to b o t h . A n d in t h e cries of t h e pessimist, I see a further danger. I n this country, o u r standard of living is such that a substantial part of our income is available for purchases that we may make t o d a y or put off until tomorrow. If w e a r e confident of t h e future, w e b u y t o d a y . If w e are not, w e decide t o m a k e t h e old c a r d o another year, to d e l a y our house p a i n t i n g until spring, or, if w e are u p to it, t o tell our wives that they can't have that n e w coat after all. S u c h decisions in t h e American home determine our relative state of business prosperity. T h e y h a v e an i m p a c t far outweighing t h e sober deliberations of Senators and statesmen. And b e c a u s e people react with great sensitivity to signs and portents, t h o s e w h o predict in public take on a great responsibility. I would therefore u r g e that w e think twice before we sell t h e future short. T h e surest way I k n o w to start a depression is to predict ourselves into o n e . T h e surest w a y to harvest those n e w products, whose seeds are sprouting in our laboratories, is to keep o u r hopes high, oilr incentives strong, and our economy d y n a m i c . AND

ENGINEERING

NEWS