Carbon Nanotubes Released from an Epoxy-Based Nanocomposite

Subscriber access provided by UNSW Library

Article

Carbon Nanotubes Released from an Epoxy-Based Nanocomposite: Quantification and Particle Toxicity Lukas Schlagenhauf, Tina Bürki-Thurnherr, Yu-Ying Kuo, Adrian Wichser, Frank Alain Nüesch, Peter Wick, and Jing Wang Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02750 • Publication Date (Web): 06 Aug 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 11, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 25

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Carbon nanotubes released from an epoxy-based

2

nanocomposite: quantification and particle toxicity

3

Lukas Schlagenhaufa,b,c, Tina Buerki-Thurnherrd, , Yu-Ying Kuob,c, Adrian Wichserb, Frank

4

Nüescha, Peter Wickd, and Jing Wang*,b,c.

5

a

6

Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland;

7 8

Laboratory for Functional Polymers, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials

b

Laboratory for Advanced Analytical Technologies, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for

Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland;

9

c

10

d

Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Laboratory for Materials-Biology Interactions, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for

11

Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

12

*Corresponding author: Jing Wang; [email protected]; Überlandstrasse 129, CH-

13

8600 Dübendorf; Tel: +41 58 765 6115; Fax: +41 58 765 46 14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


14

ABSTRACT

15

Studies combining both the quantification of free nanoparticle release and the toxicological

16

investigations of the released particles from actual nano-products in a real life exposure

17

scenario are urgently needed, yet very rare.

18

Here, a new measurement method was established to quantify the amount of free standing

19

and protruding multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in the respirable fraction of

20

particles abraded from a MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposite. The quantification approach

21

involves the pre-labeling of MWCNTs with lead ions, nanocomposite production, abrasion

22

and collection of the inhalable particle fraction and quantification of free standing and

23

protruding MWCNTs by measuring the concentration of released lead ions. In vitro toxicity

24

studies for genotoxicity, reactive oxygen species formation and cell viability were performed

25

using A549 human alveolar epithelial cells and THP-1 monocyte-derived macrophages.

26

The quantification experiment revealed that in the respirable fraction of the abraded

27

particles, approx. 4000 ppm of the MWCNTs were released as exposed MWCNTs which

28

could contact lung cells upon inhalation, and approx. 40 ppm were released as free standing

29

MWCNTs in the worst case scenario. The release of exposed MWCNTs was lower for

30

nanocomposites containing agglomerated MWCNTs. The toxicity tests revealed that the

31

abraded particles did not induce any acute cytotoxic effects.

32

1. INTRODUCTION

33

Composite materials with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as filler materials have superior

34

properties compared to the neat matrix material. The CNTs can improve the mechanical

35

properties 1 and add new features like electrical 2 and thermal conductivity 3. CNT composites

36

have numerous applications and are used in different industries, e.g. automotive, aerospace,

37

defense, electronics, energy, and sporting goods 4.


Page 2 of 25

Page 3 of 25


38

Because of the high aspect ratio and biopersistent nature of CNTs, concerns have been raised

39

that CNT composites can pose a risk to producers and consumers if the CNTs are released

40

into the environment 5–8. One possible pathway for a release of CNTs from nanocomposites is

41

the generation of particles by an abrasion process. The toxicity of abraded particles from

42

nanocomposites has been investigated already by several in vitro and in vivo studies

43

study found an additional toxic effect caused by the added nanoparticles in comparison with

44

the neat matrix materials, however for all tested composites, no release of the nanoparticles

45

was detected.

46

After abrasion of an epoxy/CNT nanocomposite, three different kinds of CNTs are potentially

47

present in the produced dust: CNTs that are completely embedded in the polymer matrix,

48

CNTs that are protruding from polymer particles, and free standing CNTs that are released

49

from the epoxy matrix. When inhaled, the free standing and protruding CNTs may directly get

50

into contact with lung cells and thus can have a toxic impact, thus they are defined as exposed

51

CNTs. Completely embedded CNTs are not expected to be toxic. In a recent study, we

52

showed that free standing single and agglomerated

53

(MWCNTs) as well as protruding MWCNTs can be released when an abrasion process was

54

applied on a MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposite

55

sufficient for a risk assessment study, which would require information on the released dose

56

of each abraded particle type (embedded, protruding, free) and on their hazard assessment.

57

Therefore, the purpose of the present study was i) to develop a novel method for the

58

quantification of the different types of abraded particles released from a CNT/epoxy

59

nanocomposite upon abrasion, ii) to apply the method on samples with different CNT

60

dispersion states, and iii) to investigate if these particles induce acute toxic, inflammatory or

61

genotoxic effects on lung epithelial cells or macrophages. Although several methods have

62

already been published that allow the detection of total CNT levels

15

9–14

. No

multi-walled carbon nanotubes

. However, the provided data were not


16–22

, none of them can


Page 4 of 25

63

determine the sub-fraction of free standing CNTs or protruding CNTs, which are most critical

64

regarding potential adverse health effects. We developed a novel method, in which MWCNTs

65

were pre-labeled with appropriate metal ions by their ability of surface adsorption

66

abrasion of a composite containing the marked MWCNTs, the generated particles were

67

collected and immersed in an acidic solution in order to desorb the ions from the exposed

68

MWCNTs 25,26 while the ions on the embedded MWCNTs remained bound. By determination

69

of the ion concentration using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), the

70

quantity of the free standing and protruding MWCNTs was determined. A scheme of the

71

quantification experiment is shown in Fig. 1. The same measurement principle can be applied

72

on an ion release from the residues of the production catalyst in the CNTs

73

approach is not applicable for CNTs with low or no catalyst residues, e.g. functionalized

74

CNTs with an acid refluxing method. Nevertheless, quantification by dissolution of the

75

intrinsic catalyst ions was used as comparison control of the adsorption method. To explore

76

the potential and the limits of this new quantification method, we assessed two sets of 1 wt%

77

MWCNT/epoxy composites that mainly differ in the type of curing agent resulting in

78

different released amounts of the three abraded particle types. The first nanocomposite

79

showed a release of protruding MWCNTs but no free standing MWCNTs when an abrasion

80

process was applied. Here we tested three different MWCNT dispersion conditions to

81

investigate if the dispersion quality had an impact on the release of MWCNTs and if such

82

differences could be detected by our quantification method. The second nanocomposite, for

83

which we have detected a release of both protruding and free standing MWCNTs upon

84

abrasion 15, was included in this study to see if the presented quantification method was able

85

to exclusively measure the free standing MWCNTs.

86

Finally, we performed in vitro toxicity studies to investigate the potential hazard of the

87

abraded dust containing free standing MWCNTs. Human alveolar epithelial cell line A549


20

23,24

. After

. However, this

Page 5 of 25


88

and human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 were chosen as they represent crucial cell

89

types of the lung, important for the formation of the air-blood barrier and for the removal of

90

foreign materials, respectively. For many nanoparticles including CNTs, it has been shown

91

that they exert adverse effects through an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading

92

to an oxidative stress that may finally culminate in the severe damage of cell compounds, the

93

release of pro-inflammatory factors, genotoxicity and finally cell death

94

assessed the effects of abraded particles from MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposites on the

95

formation of ROS by the DCF assay, on cytokine release by enzyme linked immunosorbent

96

assay (ELISA), on DNA strand breaks by the comet assay and on cell viability by the MTS

97

assay, in comparison to pure MWCNTs and abraded particles from the neat epoxy matrix or

98

the abrasion wheel.

99

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

100

2.1 MATERIAL PREPARATION

101

MWCNTs (Baytubes, C150p) were supplied by Bayer Material Science AG. The used epoxy

102

resin was Araldite GY 250 (Huntsman, USA), which was based on bisphenol A. The curing

103

agents were either the aromatic di-amine curing agent Epikure 3402 (Hexion, USA) or the

104

polytheramine Jeffamine D-230 (Huntsman, USA). The resin/hardener ratio was 100:24 for

105

the Epikure 3402 curing agent and 100:32 for the D-230 curing agent. The nanocomposite

106

preparation was identical for both epoxy systems. The MWCNTs were dispersed in the epoxy

107

resin first for 30 min by ultrasonication and then by three-roll milling (SDY200, Bühler AG,

108

Switzerland) at 30 °C and at a gap pressure of 1 MPa. The milling process was applied one to

109

three times. After mixing with the curing agent, the composite was cured at 80 °C for 12 h,

110

followed by post curing at 120 °C for 4 h.

111

2.2 INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS


27,28

. Therefore, we


112

2.2.1 ABRASION AND PARTICLE COLLECTION

113

The same setup was used for the abrasion experiment as described by Schlagenhauf et al. 15,

114

who also presented the treatment of the background particles and particle loss in the sampling

115

system. This setup included a Taber Abraser (5135, Taber, USA) with the abrasive wheel H-

116

18 (Taber, USA); 0.75 kg of weight was applied at 60 rpm. Particles were sucked with a tube

117

through an inlet and collected on Nuclepore track-etched polycarbonate membranes (111106,

118

Whatman, UK) with a pore size of 0.2 µm. The air flow was generated with a pump

119

(N816.1.2KN.18, KNF, Germany). The particle size distribution and the particle

120

microstructure of the abraded particles from the samples that were cured with the curing agent

121

3402 were presented in Schlagenhauf et al.

122

curing agent D-230 can be found in the supplemental information (SI) in Fig. S1(a)-(f).

123

The experiments required to collect particles either with an aerodynamic diameter below

124

1 µm (particulate matter PM1) or below 100 nm (ultrafine particles UFPs). For the collection

125

of PM1 particles, a combination of two cyclones was added to the sampling system. The first

126

cyclone, originally designed for a fast mobility particle sizer spectrometer (FMPS) (3901,

127

TSI, USA; part number of cyclone: 1031083R), was used to remove the majority of the coarse

128

particles. The second cyclone was used to remove the rest of the micrometer sized particles

129

(URG-2000-30EQ, URG, USA). The collection efficiency was measured during an abrasion

130

experiment with an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) (3321, TSI, USA) (see SI, Fig. S2(a)).

131

The measured particle diameter for 50 % collection efficiency D50 was approx. 0.9 µm, and

132

no particles bigger than 2 µm passed the cyclones. Depending on the abrasion rate, the two

133

cyclones were partially clogged within a few minutes and thus could allow bigger particles to

134

pass. The size of particles, passing the cyclones, was monitored by an APS connected to the

135

sampling system through an accessory loop. The abrasion process was stopped and the

136

cyclones were cleaned as soon as large particles were detected.

15

and the same analysis for the samples with the


Page 6 of 25

Page 7 of 25


137

For the collection of UFPs, in addition to the cyclones, a neutralizer (Isotope: Kr85, Eckert &

138

Ziegler Isotope Products, USA) and a Micro-Orifice Uniform-Deposit Impactor (MOUDI)

139

(122-NR, MSP, USA) were added to the sampling system. The MOUDI was operated with a

140

flow rate of 13 l/min and the stages 1-11 were used. The calibration of the MOUDI was done

141

with NaCl particles and D50 was approx. 126 nm (see SI, Fig. S2(b)). A schematic diagram of

142

the particle collection setup is shown in Fig. 2.

143

For the toxicity tests, the abraded particles were collected without the separation of large

144

particles on Nuclepore track-etched polycarbonate membranes.

145

2.2.2 MWCNT DETECTION BY ION UPTAKE AND RELEASE

146

For the ion uptake method, lead ions (Pb2+) were used as the marking element. A comparison

147

of different elements can be found in the SI, Fig. S3(a). For the preparation of the composite

148

samples, a master-batch of Pb2+ marked MWCNTs was produced with 5 g of MWCNTs,

149

immersed in 1 l of water with a Pb2+ concentration of 200 mg/l (Pb(II) acetate trihydrate

150

(Merck, Germany). The MWCNTs were dispersed in the solution for 30 min in an

151

ultrasonication bath and further stirred at 250 rpm for 2.5 h. Afterward, the solution was

152

filtered and the collected MWCNTs were rinsed several times. The MWCNTs were dried

153

overnight in a vacuum oven at 50 °C. The ion uptake capacity was determined by immersion

154

of the MWCNTs into a 0.1 M HNO3 solution (Suprapure® Nitric acid 65 %, Merck KGaA,

155

Germany) for 1 h. The MWCNTs then were removed by centrifuge filtration (Amicon Ultra-4

156

30 kDa, Merck Millipore, USA) and the concentrations of the marker ions and also of the

157

released catalyst ions were determined by ICP-MS (Elan 6000, Perkin Elmer, USA).

158

The results of the master-batch characterization are shown in the SI in Fig. S3(b). The Pb2+

159

uptake and release for this preparation procedure was 8.7 ± 0.4 µg/mg, and the released



160

catalyst ions per unit weight of MWCNTs were 2.82 ± 0.1 µg/mg for manganese (Mn2+) and

161

2.24 ± 0.1 µg/mg for cobalt (Co2+).

162

Composite samples with ion-loaded MWCNTs were produced as described above. In

163

addition, two control samples (A & B) were produced to verify the experimental setup. For

164

control sample A, Pb2+-loaded MWCNTs were dispersed in epoxy resin by sonication for

165

60 min. Afterwards, 1 g of the resin was dissolved in acetone, filtered to remove the

166

MWCNTs and dissolved in 0.1 M HNO3. This sample was produced to test if the loaded Pb2+

167

ions might be detached from the MWCNTs and be dissolved in the epoxy resin prior to the

168

curing. Control sample B was a neat epoxy sample without the addition of MWCNTs. Before

169

curing with D-230, Pb2+ ions were added to the resin and equally dispersed. The ion

170

concentration was equal to the loaded ions in a 1 wt% MWCNT sample. This sample was

171

used in the same abrasion and quantification procedure.

172

2.2.3 QUANTIFICATION OF EXPOSED MWCNTs

173

For the quantification experiment, 100 mg of mass was abraded from each sample and

174

collected on a filter. The filter then was immersed in 5 ml 0.1 M HNO3 and sonicated for

175

30 min. After 1 h, the remaining particles were removed by centrifuge filtration and the ion

176

concentration was determined by ICP-MS. For improved accuracy, the ion release of the

177

Nuclepore filter and of the neat epoxy was also measured and the value was subtracted from

178

the result. The fraction of detected MWCNTs was calculated by Eq. 1,

179

To measure the effect of the MWCNT dispersion on the release of exposed MWCNTs in the

180

respirable fraction of abraded particles, three 1 wt% MWCNT samples with the curing agent

181

D-230 were produced. The first sample was milled only once with the three roll mill, the


Page 8 of 25

Page 9 of 25


182

second twice, and the third three times. The more milling steps, the better were the nanotubes

183

dispersed and the less MWCNT agglomerates were present in the nanocomposite. For

184

nanocomposites that were prepared with the curing agent D-230, no release of free standing

185

MWCNTs was detected in preliminary experiments by inspection of transmission electron

186

microscopy (TEM) images. To measure the difference between a nanocomposite that released

187

free standing MWCNTs and one without release, one 1 wt% MWCNT sample with the curing

188

agent Epikure 3402 was produced. The three roll mill was applied three times and for samples

189

with this curing agent, a release was detected 15.

190

2.3 TOXICITY EXPERIMENTS

191

2.3.1 CELL CULTURE AND CELL TREATMENT

192

The human alveolar epithelial cell line A549 (CCL-185, ATCC, USA) and human acute

193

monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 (TIP-202, ATCC) were maintained in complete cell

194

culture medium (RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 10 % FCS

195

(Lonza, Switzerland), 0.2 mg/ml L-glutamine (Gibco®, Life Technologies (Thermo Fisher

196

Scientific), USA), and 1 % penicillin-streptomycin-neomycin (PSN) (Gibco®). Cells were

197

grown at 37 °C in a 5 % CO2 atmosphere, and were subcultured twice a week. For

198

cytotoxicity testing, abraded particles or MWCNTs were suspended in Millipore water

199

containing 0.016 % Pluronic F127 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) to a final stock solution of

200

500 µg/ml. The particle suspensions were sonicated in an ultrasonic bath (Sonorex Super RK

201

156 BH, Bandelin, Germany) for 10 min and further diluted with complete cell culture

202

medium prior to the experiments. The final water content (16%) was the same for all dilutions

203

(0-80 µg/ml) to exclude unspecific effects due to different dilution levels of the cell culture

204

medium. To differentiate THP-1 monocytes into macrophages, cells were treated for 3 days

205

with 200 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) before

206

particle exposure. ACS Paragon Plus Environment


Page 10 of 25

207

2.3.2 ANALYSIS OF CELL VIABILITY/ACTIVITY (MTS ASSAY)

208

Cell viability was determined using the CellTiter96 Aqueous One Solution (Promega, USA)

209

containing MTS as the tetrazolium compound according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In

210

brief, 8 × 103 A549 cells or 4 × 104 THP-1 cells were seeded in 200 µl of complete cell

211

culture medium per well of a 96 well plate and grown for 1 day (A549) or 3 days (THP-1, in

212

presence of PMA). Cells were then treated with 200 µl per well of abraded particles,

213

MWCNTs or the positive control CdSO4 at the indicated concentrations for 3, 24 or 48 h.

214

Thereafter, medium containing stimuli was replaced by 120 µl of MTS working solution,

215

incubated for 60 min at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 before optical density was measured at 490 nm in

216

an EL800 microplate reader (BioTEK Instruments, USA). Original OD(490) values were

217

blank-corrected and normalized to untreated samples.

218

2.3.3 DETECTION OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES (DCF ASSAY)

219

The formation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was determined using the

220

dichlorofluorescein

221

dichlodihydrofluorescein, Molecular Probes) to fluorescent DCF by ROS. Briefly, 2 × 104

222

A549 cells or 4 × 104 THP-1 cells were seeded per well of a 96 well plate in a volume of

223

200 µl and grown for 1 day (A549) or 3 days (THP-1, in presence of PMA). Thereafter, the

224

medium was replaced by 100 µl of 50 µM H2DCFDA in Hank’s buffered salt solution

225

(HBSS) and cells were incubated for 60 min at 37 °C and 5 % CO2. After washing with

226

prewarmed HBSS, cells were exposed to 100 µl of the indicated particle concentrations. The

227

peroxinitrite donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine (Sin-1, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a positive

228

control. Sin-1 generates both superoxide anion and nitric oxide that spontaneously form

229

peroxynitrite, a potent oxidant. Fluorescent intensities were measured after 2 h using a

230

FLX800 fluorescence microplate reader (BioTEK Instruments) at an excitation wavelength of

(DCF)

assay,

measuring

the

conversion


of

H2DCF

(2’,7’-

Page 11 of 25


231

485 nm and an emission wavelength of 528 nm. Fluorescence values were blank-corrected

232

and normalized to untreated controls.

233

2.3.4 DETERMINATION OF DNA DAMAGE (COMET ASSAY)

234

A549 and THP-1 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 2.5 × 105 cells /well one day (A549) or

235

3 days (THP-1, in presence of PMA) before treatment. Cells were exposed to the indicated

236

concentrations of particles for 30 min and 3 h. Ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS, 5 mM, Sigma-

237

Aldrich) was used as a positive control and added 30 min before the end of the incubation.

238

The alkaline comet assay was then performed as previously described

239

provided in the SI). Comets were analysed using a Nikon Eclipse TS 100 microscope

240

equipped with a Stingray F046B IRF Jenofilt camera (Allied Vision Technologies, Germany)

241

and the software “Comet IV” (Perceptive Instruments, United Kingdom) respectively. Per

242

slide, 100 randomly chosen comets were analysed blinded.

243

2.3.5 CYTOKINE ASSAY (ELISA)

244

8 × 103 A549 cells or 4 × 104 THP-1 cells were seeded in 200 µl of complete cell culture

245

medium per well of a 96 well plate and grown for 1 day (A549) or 3 days (THP-1, in presence

246

of PMA). Cells were then treated with 200 µl per well of abraded particles, MWCNTs or

247

positive controls (TNFα for A549 cells; lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for THP-1 cells) at the

248

indicated concentrations for 3, 8 or 24 h. Supernatants were stored at 20 °C until

249

measurement. IL-8 or TNFα levels were determined using a commercial ELISA kit (IL-8 or

250

TNFα ELISA Ready-SET-Go, eBioscience, USA) according to the manufacturer’s

251

instructions.

252

2.4 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS


29

(a full description is


Page 12 of 25

253

For the quantification experiments, the samples were abraded and measured five times. The

254

significance of difference between different quantification datasets was measured with F-tests

255

by usage of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (OriginPro 8, OriginLab corporation,

256

USA).

257

The toxicity data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (StEM) from at least three

258

independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed Student's

259

t test (Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Corporation, USA). A p-value below 0.05 was considered

260

to be statistically significant.

261

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

262

3.1 NANOPARTICLE DETECTION BY ION RELEASE

263

The results of the quantification experiment for the PM1 particles from the control samples,

264

the samples with different MWCNT dispersion conditions, and the sample that releases free

265

standing MWCNTs are shown in Fig. 3(a). Control sample A, the uncured epoxy resin with

266

Pb2+-loaded MWCNTs, showed that no lead or catalyst ions were transferred to the epoxy

267

resin during the sonication. This is a prerequisite for the quantification method. For control

268

sample B (Pb2+-loaded neat epoxy D-230), the fraction of the released Pb2+ out of the total

269

amount in the epoxy was 790 ± 1000 ppm. Compared to the abrasion samples with Pb2+-

270

loaded MWCNTs (1wt% MWCNT D-230 triply milled), significantly less Pb2+ was emitted

271

(P < 0.025). Even though only particles < 1 µm were collected, the diffusion pathway was too

272

long for all ions to be released. This result shows that the measured ions from the

273

nanocomposites origin mainly from exposed MWCNTs. It is not known whether the ions

274

loaded on the totally embedded MWCNTs can migrate to the solution at all. Since diffusion

275

would be the major mechanism in this process, the experiment could be improved by

276

shortening the period between particle dissolution and filtering, at least if only the fast


Page 13 of 25


277

desorbing loaded ions are measured 25 and not the catalyst ions, whose dissolution needs more

278

time. This shows the limits of the quantification experiment when catalyst ions are used.

279

For the four 1 wt% MWCNT samples, both applied ion detection methods measured a similar

280

percentage of released ions independent of the sample preparation. Therefore, either method

281

can be used to quantify free and protruding MWCNTs in PM1 samples provided that enough

282

MWCNT catalyst is present in the MWCNTs. The three 1 wt% MWCNT samples with the

283

curing agent D-230 revealed a release behavior that was dependent on the dispersion

284

condition of the MWCNTs. If measuring the intrinsic catalyst ions, the sample with the worst

285

dispersion (one milling step) released significantly less exposed MWCNTs in the respirable

286

fraction than the standard sample with three milling steps (P < 0.007). For the measurement

287

with the Pb2+ ions, the result was less clear due to a larger measurement uncertainty of this

288

method (P < 0.14). We did not detect a difference in Pb2+ release between the triply milled D-

289

230 sample and the Epikure 3402, which implies that free standing MWCNTs are a minor

290

fraction of the PM1 particles. Therefore we performed quantification measurement for the

291

UFPs, in which the fraction of free standing MWCNTs was expected to be higher.

292

In a previous publication it was found that an epoxy composite containing poorly dispersed

293

MWCNTs was more likely to release free standing MWCNTs to the environment due to an

294

abrasion process 30. Interestingly, our results indicate the contrary, considerably less exposed

295

MWCNTs were present in once milled composites. These results imply that the low energy

296

abrasion process of the Taber Abraser was not capable of breaking up the MWCNT

297

agglomerates within the composite. Moreover, those agglomerates still bound to the epoxy

298

matrix, either were in the fraction of particles larger than 1 µm or they remained largely

299

covered by the epoxy. Therefore the total quantity of exposed MWCNTs (protruding or free

300

standing) was smaller for samples with poorly dispersed MWCNTs. For other abrasion



Page 14 of 25

301

processes that use high energy input to abrade particles such as a sanding machine, the effect

302

of particle agglomeration on particle release has to be verified separately.

303

The results of the UFP measurements are shown in Fig. 3(b). In contrast to the measurements

304

of PM1 samples, the measured average values for ion release in UFP samples were much

305

lower and lay between 10 and 80 ppm. For the three samples with different dispersion states,

306

no different ion release among the samples was detected. Interestingly, when testing for the

307

expected increase of ion release in the Epikure samples, we only observed a significantly

308

increased ion release for Pb2+-loaded samples (approx. 50 ppm, p

Carbon Nanotubes Released from an Epoxy-Based Nanocomposite

Recommend Documents