Cecal Succinate Elevated by Some Dietary ... - ACS Publications

May 23, 2014 - The growth and proliferation of HT29 human colon cancer cells and .... (17) Cecal contents (300 mg) were homogenized by ultrasonication...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by OAKLAND UNIV

Article

Cecal Succinate Elevated by Some Dietary Polyphenols May Inhibit Colon Cancer Cell Proliferation and Angiogenesis Tomoaki Haraguchi, Tomoko Kayashima, Yukako Okazaki, Junji Inoue, Shigeru Mineo, Kiminori Matsubara, Ei Sakaguchi, Noriyuki Yanaka, and Norihisa Kato J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jf501142k • Publication Date (Web): 23 May 2014 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 4, 2014

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Title:

2

Cecal Succinate Elevated by Some Dietary Polyphenols May Inhibit Colon

3

Cancer Cell Proliferation and Angiogenesis

4

Author names:

5

Tomoaki Haraguchi1, Tomoko Kayashima2*, Yukako Okazaki3, Junji Inoue4, Shigeru

6

Mineo5, Kiminori Matsubara6, Ei Sakaguchi7, Noriyuki Yanaka1 and Norihisa Kato1

7

Author address:

8

1

9

Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan,

Graduate

School

of

Biosphere

Science,

Hiroshima

University,

1-4-4,

10

2

Faculty of Culture and Education, Saga University, 1, Honjou, Saga 840-8502, Japan

11

3

Faculty of Human Life Sciences, Fuji Women’s University, 4-5 Hanakawa Minami,

12

Ishikari 061-3204, Japan

13

4

Ahjikan Co. Ltd., Hiroshima 733-0833, Japan

14

5

Institutes of Health, BOURBON Corporation, Kashiwazaki 945-0114, Japan

15

6

Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1, Higashi-Hiroshima,

16

739-8524, Japan

17

7

18

Tsushimanaka, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan

Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, 1-1-1,

19 20 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

21

Author responsible for correspondence:

22

Tomoko Kayashima

23

Faculty of Culture and Education, Saga University, 1, Honjou, Saga 840-8502, Japan

24

Tel: +81-952-28-8380

25

Fax: +81-952-28-8380

26

E-mail: [email protected]

27

Title running-header:

28

Elevated succinate by polyphenols, and cancer

29

Author Email address:

30

Tomoaki Haraguchi ([email protected])

31

Tomoko Kayashima*, Ph.D. ([email protected])

32

Yukako Okazaki, Ph.D. ([email protected])

33

Junji Inoue ([email protected])

34

Shigeru Mineo ([email protected])

35

Kiminori Matsubara, Ph.D. ([email protected])

36

Ei Sakaguchi, Ph.D. ([email protected])

37

Noriyuki Yanaka, Ph.D. ([email protected])

38

Norihisa Kato, Ph.D. ([email protected])

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 29

Page 3 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

ABSTRACT

2

This study demonstrated 0.5% dietary rutin, ellagic acid, or curcumin markedly

3

increased cecal succinate levels in rats fed a high-fat diet, while catechin, caffeic acid,

4

and quercetin did not. Other organic acids were modestly or hardly affected by

5

polyphenols. To clarify the effects of succinate levels increased by polyphenols, we

6

examined the effects of succinate on the growth and proliferation of colon cancer cells

7

and angiogenesis. The growth and proliferation of HT29 human colon cancer cells and

8

angiogenesis in an ex vivo model were significantly inhibited by succinate at a dose

9

close to that in the cecum of rats fed polyphenols. Furthermore, succinate inhibited the

10

migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. These findings suggest that

11

consumption of some polyphenols affect the health and diseases of the large intestine

12

by elevating succinate.

13

KEYWORDS: rats, polyphenols, succinate, colon cancer cells, angiogenesis

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

14

INTRODUCTION

15

Polyphenols, which are abundant in plant foods, exhibit various beneficial

16

activities such as anti-oxidative, anti-atherogenic, anti-diabetic, anti-cancer, anti-viral,

17

anti-inflammatory, and anti-angiogenic activities1-3. We previously reported that the

18

dietary addition of some polyphenols including curcumin, caffeic acid, catechin, rutin,

19

and ellagic acid suppress fecal levels of secondary bile acids, namely deoxycholic acid

20

and/or lithocholic acid (which are risk factors for colon diseases), in rats fed a high-fat

21

diet4. A high-fat diet increases fecal secondary bile acids5, 6, causing compensatory

22

proliferation of colonic epithelium cells7, 8. This suggests such polyphenols might have

23

beneficial effects on colon health by reducing secondary bile acids in animals fed a

24

high-fat diet4. High-fat diets not only increase fecal secondary bile acid levels, but also

25

lower cecal organic acid production6. Mounting evidence indicates the increased

26

production of intestinal organic acids including butyrate and propionate is associated

27

with a decreased risk of colon cancer and colitis9, 10. Meanwhile, indigestible or limited

28

digestible food constituents such as resistant starch11 and inulin12 increase cecal

29

organic acid levels in both rats and humans. However, there is limited information

30

concerning the effects of dietary polyphenols on cecal organic acids. Therefore, this

31

study examined the effects of dietary polyphenols on cecal levels of organic acids in

32

rats fed a high-fat diet.

33

Succinate is an important metabolic molecule as an intermediate in the citric 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 29

Page 5 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

34

acid cycle. It is known as an umami-tasting substance and is found in shellfish, refined

35

sake, and soy sauce. Recent studies suggest organic acids such as butyrate and

36

propionate may contribute to intestinal immune and barrier function13-15. However, the

37

role of succinate remains incompletely understood. In this study, we provided evidence

38

that consumption of some polyphenols markedly elevated cecal succinate in rats fed a

39

high-fat diet. Therefore, this study also examined the effect of succinate on the growth

40

of colon carcinoma cells and angiogenesis.

41 42

MATERIALS AND METHODS

43

Materials

44

Rutin, curcumin, catechin, caffeic acid, quercetin, succinate disodium salt, and

45

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), were purchased

46

from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). Ellagic acid was obtained from Wako Pure

47

Chemical Industry (Osaka, Japan). Human recombinant vascular endothelial growth

48

factor (VEGF) was obtained from R&D Systems (MN, USA). Other reagents were

49

special grade as commercially available.

50

Animals and Diets

51

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Kanagawa, Japan)

52

weighing 40–50 g (3 weeks old) were used. The rats were individually housed in metal

53

separate cages in a temperature-controlled (24°C) room with a 12-h light–dark cycle 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

54

(lights on from 08:00–20:00). The rats were allowed a 1-week acclimation period

55

before the experiments. The rats were maintained according to the “Guide for the Care

56

and Use of Laboratory Animals” established by Hiroshima University. The protocol

57

was approved by “the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the

58

Hiroshima University” (Permit Number: D08-16). The control group received a

59

high-fat diet that contained 30% fat, without polyphenols. The basal diet comprised

60

30% beef tallow, 20% casein, 20.3% corn starch, 20% sucrose, 5% cellulose, 3.5% salt

61

mixture (AIN-93G) 16, 1% vitamin mixture (AIN-93) 16, and 0.2% L-cystine (made up

62

to 100% with corn starch). Rats allocated to the 0.5% polyphenol groups received the

63

high-fat diet supplemented with 0.5% polyphenols including rutin, ellagic acid,

64

curcumin, catechin, caffeic acid, or quercetin. All rats were fed the same amount of

65

experimental diet (9, 10, 12, 14, and 15 g for days 1, 2–4, 5–7, 8–13, and 14–21,

66

respectively) to suppress any variation in food intake due to ad libitum feeding. All

67

diets were provided daily at 19:00 in food cups in the cages, and all rats had

68

completely consumed the diets by the next morning. All rats had ad libitum access to

69

deionized water. After 3 weeks of diet feeding, the rats were euthanized between

70

13:00–15:00. The cecal contents were removed, weighed, and stored at -80°C for later

71

analysis.

72

Cecal Contents Analysis

73

The levels of organic acids in the cecum were measured by high-performance 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 29

Page 7 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

74

liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described previously17. Cecal contents (300 mg)

75

were homogenized by ultrasonication in 2 mL 10 mM sodium hydroxide aqueous

76

solution containing 0.5 g/L crotonic acid and subsequently centrifuged at 10,000 × g

77

for 15 min. Fat-soluble substances in the supernatant were removed by extraction with

78

chloroform. The aqueous phase was filtered through a membrane filter, and the

79

samples were subjected to HPLC. Organic acids were separated with an ion exclusion

80

column and detected using an H-type cation exchanger column with a column

81

temperature of 45°C, mobile phase of 5 mM p-toluene sulfonic acid aqueous solution,

82

positive polarity electroconductivity detector at 45°C, and detection reagent of 20 mM

83

bis-Tris aqueous solution containing 5 mM p-toluene sulfonic acid and 100 µM EDTA.

84

Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

85

HT29, human colon cancer cells were cultured routinely in Dulbecco’s

86

modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum,

87

penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 units/mL). Subcultures of HT29 were

88

obtained by treating cell cultures with 2% trypsin/EDTA buffer. Human umbilical vein

89

endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from Kurabo Industries (Osaka, Japan)

90

and grown in HuMedia EG 2 medium (Kurabo), which is modified MCDB 131

91

medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum, 10 ng/mL recombinant human epidermal

92

growth factor, 1 µg/mL hydrocortisone, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, 50 ng/mL amphotericin

93

B, 5 ng/mL recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor, and 10 µg/mL heparin. 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

94

Subcultures of HUVECs were obtained by treating the HUVEC culture with

95

Hanks’-based enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer (Gibco, New York, USA).

96

HUVECs at passages 3−7 were used in the experiment. All cells were maintained at

97

37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

98

MTT Assay

99

For the growth assay of HT29 cells, cells were suspended in DMEM and

100

plated onto 96-well culture plates (3.0 × 103 cells/100 µL). For the growth assay of

101

HUVECs, cells were suspended in HuMedia EG2 Medium and plated onto 96-well

102

culture plates (1.5 × 103 cells/100 µL). Cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a

103

humidified incubator with 5% CO2. The media were replaced with fresh media

104

containing sodium succinate (1−30 mM), or vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]).

105

After exposing the cells for 24 h or 72 h, MTT solution (final concentration, 5 mg/mL

106

MTT in PBS) was added to each well, and the cells were incubated for 3 h. The media

107

were aspirated, and the cells were lysed in dimethyl sulfoxide. Absorbance was

108

measured at 550 nm in an ELNX96 microplate reader (TFB Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

109

Reported values represent the averages for 6 wells.

110

BrdU Incorporation Assay

111

Experiments were conducted in 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well) with 2

112

replicates. After exposing the cells with or without the media containing sodium

113

succinate (30 mM) for 24 h, HT29 cells were incubated with 100 µM 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 29

Page 9 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

114

bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) for 2 h at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

115

To detect BrdU immunoreactivity, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4%

116

paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. After washing twice with PBS, cell

117

samples were incubated with PBS with 1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 10

118

min. Cells were again washed twice with PBS and incubated with 2 N HCl. After

119

removing the HCl, cells were washed 3 times with 0.1 mM borate buffer (pH 8.5). For

120

blocking, 4% skim milk with PBS was added, and the cells were slowly shaken at

121

room temperature. After 1 h incubation, the blocking buffer was discarded, and BrdU

122

antibody (1:1000; 1 mL/plate) and DAPI (40 mg/mL, 1:1000) were added. The cells

123

were incubated at room temperature for 1.5 h and then washed 3 times with PBS.

124

Cy3-labeled anti-mouse IgG was added as a secondary antibody (1:1000; 1 mL/plate),

125

and the cells were incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were then

126

washed 3 times with PBS. The cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy, and

127

BrdU-positive cells were counted on 10 image fields. The average number of

128

BrdU-positive cells in each sample was subsequently calculated.

129

Ex vivo Angiogenesis Assay

130

Male Wistar rats (6 weeks old, Charles River Laboratories) were maintained

131

according to the guide established by Hiroshima University Animal Research

132

Committee as mentioned above. The ex vivo angiogenesis assay was carried out in the

133

rat aortic model18, 19 with slight modifications20. Briefly, a rat aortic segment coved 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

134

with the collagen gel was overlaid with 2 mL culture medium (RPMI 1640 medium)

135

containing sodium succinate (10 or 30 mM) or vehicle (PBS) and incubated for 10

136

days in a fully humidified system of 5% CO2 at 37°C. The culture medium with

137

sample was changed on 7th day. After 10 days incubation, microscopic fields were

138

photographed with a digital camera (DSE330-A system, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan),

139

and the length of the capillary was measured using Adobe Photoshop software CS3.

140

Each reported value represents the average of 3 or 4 culture samples.

141

Endothelial Cell Tube Formation and Chemotaxis Assays

142

The HUVEC tube formation assay was performed using BD Matrigel™ (BD

143

Biosciences, New Jersey, USA) as described previously20. Reported values represent

144

the averages of 3 samples. The HUVEC chemotaxis assay was performed in a

145

modified Boyden chamber20,

146

membrane at 200× magnification, and the average number of cells in each field was

147

calculated. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

148

Statistical Analysis

21

. Migrated cells were counted in 3 fields of each

149

Statistical analysis was conducted by one-way analysis of variation (ANOVA)

150

and Dunnet’s multiple-range test (Excel Statistics 2006 for Windows, Social Survey

151

Research Information Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Statistical significance was estimated at

152

p < 0.05.

153 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 29

Page 11 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

154

RESULTS

155

Effect of Polyphenols on Cecal Organic Acids in Rats Fed a High-Fat Diet

156

Dietary addition of polyphenols did not affect the food intake, final body

157

weight, or liver weight of the rats (data not shown). The wet weight of cecal contents

158

was higher in the curcumin and ellagic acid groups than the control group (p < 0.05,

159

Table 1). The cecal concentration (µmol/g wet digesta) of succinate was markedly

160

higher in the rutin (6.4-fold), ellagic acid (5.3-fold), and curcumin (4.6-fold) groups

161

than the control group (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, dietary catechin and caffeic acid tended

162

to increase cecal concentrations of succinate (p < 0.1). Acetate and butyrate

163

concentrations

164

significantly lower in the quercetin group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).

165

The concentrations of other organic acids including formate, propionate, isobutyrate,

166

and valerate were unaffected by dietary polyphenols. Dietary rutin and ellagic acid

167

significantly increased the concentrations of total organic acids compared to the

168

control (1.9-fold and 1.6-fold, respectively, p < 0.05). The pH of digesta was

169

significantly lower in the rutin group than the control group (p < 0.05).

170

Effects of Succinate on HT29 Cell Growth and Proliferation

were

significantly higher and

isovalerate concentration

was

171

Succinate significantly inhibited the growth of the HT29 cells at both 10 and

172

30 mM (Figure 1, p < 0.05). Analysis of cell proliferation by BrdU incorporation into

173

the cells indicated 30 mM succinate significantly reduced (−30%) the proportion of 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

174

proliferative cells (control vs. succinate: 32.6 ± 2.0% and 22.8 ± 1.8%, respectively, n

175

= 6, p < 0.05).

176

Effects of Succinate on ex vivo Angiogenesis and Endothelial Cell Functions

177

In the ex vivo angiogenesis model using a rat aortic ring, microvessels

178

appeared from the ends of aortic rings and elongated in the absence of succinate

179

(Figure 2A). Meanwhile, microvessel growth was significantly inhibited in the

180

presence of 30 mM succinate (Figures 2C, D, p < 0.01).

181

The effect of succinate on HUVEC functions including tube formation on a

182

reconstituted basement membrane, chemotaxis, and growth are shown in Figure 3.

183

HUVECs inoculated onto a reconstituted basement membrane migrated, attached to

184

each other, and finally formed tube structures in the tube formation assay model. In

185

this assay, succinate did not significantly suppress HUVEC tube formation (Figure 3A).

186

However, succinate at both 10 and 30 mM significantly inhibited HUVEC migration

187

stimulated with VEGF in a gelatin-coated Boyden chamber (Figure 3B, p < 0.01).

188

However, succinate did not significantly affect the growth of HUVECs (Figure 3C).

189 190

DISCUSSION

191

We previously reported that some dietary polyphenols suppress fecal levels of

192

secondary bile acids, namely deoxycholic acid and/or lithocholic acid, in rats fed a

193

high-fat diet4. This study further provides the novel evidence indicating dietary 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 29

Page 13 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

194

supplementation of rutin, ellagic acid, and curcumin to a high-fat diet markedly

195

increase cecal succinate concentrations in rats. However, dietary catechin, caffeic acid,

196

and quercetin hardly affected cecal succinate concentrations. Aprikian et al. report that

197

adding a polyphenol-rich apple concentrate (~0.7 g polyphenol/kg diet) to a normal

198

diet (with 5% corn oil) did not affect cecal succinate concentrations in rats22.

199

Furthermore, in our preliminary study, dietary addition of 0.5% ellagic acid to a low

200

fat-diet (5% beef tallow) failed to elevate cecal succinate levels in rats (Haraguchi et

201

al., unpublished data), but the reason of no such effect is unknown. Thus, the effect of

202

polyphenols on cecal succinate levels might be dependent on dietary fat intake as well

203

as the kinds and levels of polyphenols in the diet. Intriguingly, the dietary addition of

204

rutin significantly increased cecal succinate levels, whereas quercetin did not.

205

Quercetin and its glycosidic form, rutin, are common flavonoids in edible foods.

206

However, the absorption processes of these polyphenols are quite different. Crespy et

207

al. report quercetin can be partly absorbed in the stomach whereas rutin cannot23.

208

Dietary rutin likely escapes absorption in the stomach and small intestine to reach the

209

large intestine, leading it to significantly affect cecal succinate production.

210

Because succinate is the major metabolite of Bacteroides in the large

211

intestine24, we examined the effect of the polyphenols on the cecal profile of the

212

microflora by 16S rDNA-based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism

213

analysis. The results indicate dietary 0.5% curcumin, ellagic acid, and rutin did not 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

214

significantly affect the proportion of cecal microflora including Bacteroides,

215

Clostridium, Lactobacillales, and Bifidobacterium (unpublished data). Thus, the

216

increased production of cecal succinate by such polyphenols cannot be accounted for

217

by the microfloral profile. In our previous study, besides 0.5% dietary curcumin,

218

ellagic acid, and rutin, 0.5% dietary caffeic acid and catechin also markedly reduced

219

fecal toxic secondary bile acids such as deoxycholic and lithocholic acid (which are

220

risk factors for colon diseases) in rats fed high-fat diet4. Therefore, the overall

221

association between alterations in the cecal profile of organic acids and fecal

222

secondary bile acids appears to be weak.

223

To gain further insight into the polyphenol-induce increase in cecal succinate

224

levels, we examined the effects of succinate on colon cancer cells and angiogenesis.

225

The results indicate 30 mM succinate, which corresponds to the cecal level in the rats

226

fed various polyphenols, inhibits the growth and proliferation of HT29 colon cancer

227

cells. An animal study by Inagaki et al. also demonstrates 100 mM succinate inhibits

228

epithelial cell proliferation in the colon mucosa in rats25. Succinate accumulates in

229

colon and stomach cancers26, 27, although it remains unclear if succinate itself is related

230

to colon cancer. Succinate is known to inhibit the function of HIF prolyl hydroxylases

231

(PHDs); a line of data indicates PHDs have essential functions in cell growth and

232

proliferation28. Therefore, it would be of interest to determine if the inhibitory effect of

233

succinate on the growth and proliferation of colon cancer cells is mediated by the 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 29

Page 15 of 29

234

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

inactivation of PHDs.

235

Angiogenesis plays key role in the development of malignant tumors and

236

inflammatory bowel disease29. The inhibition of angiogenesis prevents tumor growth

237

and metastases, and thus inflammatory bowel disease. The results of the present ex

238

vivo angiogenesis model indicate succinate has anti-angiogenic effects at 30 mM,

239

which is the dose corresponding to cecal levels in rats fed various polyphenols.

240

Furthermore, the addition of succinate inhibited HUVEC migration but not HUVEC

241

tube formation or growth. Thus, the anti-angiogenic effect of succinate might be at

242

least in part mediated by suppression in VEGF-induced HUVEC migration. Succinate

243

at the µM order is reported to enhance retinal angiogenesis by mediating

244

G-protein-coupled receptor 91330. However, in our study, the concentrations of

245

succinate at 100-500 µM did not affect angiogenesis in an ex vivo model (unpublished

246

data). This discrepancy might be due to differences in experimental models. Although

247

succinate inhibits PHDs, some conflicting evidence indicates PHDs either suppress or

248

activate angiogenesis28. Dietary rutin, ellagic acid, and curcumin are reported to

249

suppress colon carcinogenesis in rodents31, 32. This raises the question of whether the

250

suppression of colon cancer by polyphenols is related to the concentrations of

251

intestinal succinate elevated by polyphenols.

252

Interestingly, this study indicated that dietary supplementation of quercetin

253

increases cecal concentrations of butyrate and acetate in rats. Butyrate produced by 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 29

254

intestinal microbial fermentation exerts potentially useful effects on prevention and

255

inhibition of colonic carcinogenesis and other intestinal and extraintestinal disoders33.

256

Recent

257

LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells34. It was reported that fermentation of apple extracts

258

containing quercetin compounds resulted in an increase of butyrate and acetate in vitro

259

with human fecal flora35. To our knowledge, our study provides the first in vivo

260

evidence for the elevations in these organic acids in the cecum of animals fed

261

quercetin.

study

indicated

moderate

anti-inflammatory

activity

of

acetate

in

262

In summary, this study provides the first evidence that the consumption of some

263

polyphenols remarkably increases cecal succinate levels in rats. Furthermore, succinate

264

at the levels close to those in the colonic ruminal environment suppressed the

265

proliferation of colon cancer cells and angiogenesis. These findings provide novel

266

insights into the roles of some polyphenols in the health and diseases of the large

267

intestine.

268

ABBREVIATIONS USED

269

BrdU, bromo-deoxyuridine;

270

DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium;

271

HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography;

272

MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide;

273

PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

274

VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;

275

HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell;

276

PHDs, prolyl hydroxylases

277 278

LITERATURE CITED

279

1.

Middleton, E. Jr.; Kandaswami, C.; Theoharides, T. C., The effects of plant

280

flavonoids on mammalian cells: implications for inflammation, heart disease, and

281

cancer. Pharmacol. Rev. 2000, 52, 673-751.

282

2.

polyphenols. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2002, 13, 380-390.

283 284

Cao, Y.; Cao, R.; Brakenhielm, E., Antiangiogenic mechanisms of diet-derived

3.

Scalbert, A.; Manach, C.; Morand, C.; Remesy, C.; Jimenez, L., Dietary

285

polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45,

286

287-306.

287

4.

Han, Y.; Haraguchi, T.; Iwanaga, S.; Tomotake, H.; Okazaki, Y.; Mineo, S.;

288

Moriyama, A.; Inoue, J.; Kato, N., Consumption of some polyphenols reduces

289

fecal deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, the secondary bile acids of risk

290

factors of colon cancer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8587-8590.

291

5.

1981, 41, 3700-3705.

292 293

Reddy, B. S., Dietary fat and its relationship to large bowel cancer. Cancer Res.

6.

Wu, W. T.; Chen, H. L., Effects of konjac glucomannan on putative risk factors

17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

294

for colon carcinogenesis in rats fed a high-fat diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59,

295

989-994.

296

7.

Bernstein, H.; Bernstein, C.; Payne, C. M.; Dvorakova, K.; Garewal, H., Bile

297

acids as carcinogens in human gastrointestinal cancers. Mutat. Res. 2005, 589,

298

47-65.

299

8.

disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 1999, 159, 2647-2658.

300 301 302

Hofmann, A. F., The continuing importance of bile acids in liver and intestinal

9.

Scheppach, W., Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut 1994, 35, S35-38.

303

10. Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, H.; Robbins, G. T.; Nie, D., G-protein-coupled receptor

304

for short-chain fatty acids suppresses colon cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128,

305

847-856.

306

11. Kleessen, B.; Stoof, G.; Proll, J.; Schmiedl, D.; Noack, J.; Blaut, M., Feeding

307

resistant starch affects fecal and cecal microflora and short-chain fatty acids in

308

rats. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 2453-2462.

309

12. Kim, M.; Shin, H. K., The water-soluble extract of chicory influences serum and

310

liver lipid concentrations, cecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations and fecal

311

lipid excretion in rats. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 1731-1736.

312

13. Ishizuka, S.; Tanaka, S.; Xu, H.; Hara, H., Fermentable dietary fiber potentiates

313

the localization of immune cells in the rat large intestinal crypts. Exp. Biol. Med. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 29

Page 19 of 29

314

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

2004, 229, 876-884.

315

14. Shimotoyodome, A.; Meguro, S.; Hase, T.; Tokimitsu, I.; Sakata, T., Short chain

316

fatty acids but not lactate or succinate stimulate mucus release in the rat colon.

317

Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2000, 125, 525-531.

318

15. Barcelo, A.; Claustre, J.; Moro, F.; Chayvialle, J. A.; Cuber, J. C.; Plaisancié, P.,

319

Mucin secretion is modulated by luminal factors in the isolated vascularly

320

perfused rat colon. Gut 2000, 46, 218-224.

321

16. Reeves, P. G.; Nielsen, F. H.; Fahey, G. C., Jr. AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory

322

rodents: Final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing

323

committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J. Nutr. 1993, 123,

324

1939–1951.

325

17. Okazaki, Y.; Utama, Z.; Suidasari, S.; Zhang, P.; Yanaka, N.; Tomotake, H.;

326

Sakaguchi, E.; Kato, N., Consumption of vitamin B6 reduces fecal ratio of

327

lithocholic acid to deoxycholic acid, a risk factor for colon cancer, in rats fed a

328

high-fat diet. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2012, 58, 366-370.

329

18. Kawasaki, S.; Mori, M.; Awai, M., Capillary growth of rat aortic segments

330

cultured in collagen gel without serum. Acta. Pathologica. Jpn. 1989, 39,

331

712-718.

332

19. Mori, M.; Sadahira, Y.; Kawasaki, S.; Hayashi, T.; Notohara, K.; Awai, M.,

333

Capillary growth from reversed rat aortic segments cultured in collagen gel. Acta. 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

334

Pathologica. Jpn. 1988, 38, 1503-1512.

335

20. Kayashima, T.; Matsubara, K., Antiangiogenic effect of carnosic acid and

336

carnosol, neuroprotective compounds in rosemary leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol.

337

Biochem. 2012, 76, 115-119.

338

21. Kim, K. S.; Hong, Y. K.; Joe, Y. A.; Lee, Y.; Shin, J. Y.; Park, H. E.; Lee, I. H.;

339

Lee, S. Y.; Kang, D. K.; Chang, S. I.; Chung, S. I., Anti-angiogenic activity of the

340

recombinant kringle domain of urokinase and its specific entry into endothelial

341

cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 11449-11456.

342

22. Aprikian, O.; Duclos, V.; Guyot, S.; Besson, C.; Manach, C.; Bernalier, A.;

343

Morand, C.; Rémésy, C.; Demigné, C., Apple pectin and a polyphenol-rich apple

344

concentrate are more effective together than separately on cecal fermentations and

345

plasma lipids in rats. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 1860-1865.

346

23. Crespy, V.; Morand, C.; Besson, C.; Manach, C.; Demigne, C.; Remesy, C.,

347

Quercetin, but not its glycosides, is absorbed from the rat stomach. J. Agric. Food

348

Chem. 2002, 50, 618-621.

349

24. Rotstein, O. D.; Pruett, T. L.; Fiegel, V. D.; Nelson, R. D.; Simmons, R. L.,

350

Succinic acid, a metabolic by-product of Bacteroides species, inhibits

351

polymorphonuclear leukocyte function. Infect. Immun. 1985, 48, 402-408.

352

25. Inagaki, A.; Ichikawa, H.; Sakata, T., Inhibitory effect of succinic acid on

353

epithelial cell proliferation of colonic mucosa in rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2007, 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 29

Page 21 of 29

354

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

53, 377-379.

355

26. Kanazawa, K.; Konishi, F.; Mitsuoka, T.; Terada, A.; Itoh, K.; Narushima, S.;

356

Kumemura, M.; Kimura, H., Factors influencing the development of sigmoid

357

colon cancer. Bacteriologic and biochemical studies. Cancer 1996, 77,

358

1701-1706.

359

27. Hirayama, A.; Kami, K.; Sugimoto, M.; Sugawara, M.; Toki, N.; Onozuka, H.;

360

Kinoshita, T.; Saito, N.; Ochiai, A.; Tomita, M.; Esumi, H.; Soga, T., Quantitative

361

metabolome profiling of colon and stomach cancer microenvironment by

362

capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Cancer Res. 2009, 69,

363

4918-4925.

364 365 366 367

28. Jokilehto, T.; Jaakkola, P. M., The role of HIF prolyl hydroxylases in tumour growth. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2010, 14, 758-770. 29. Folkman, J., Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 27-31.

368

30. Sapieha, P.; Sirinyan, M.; Hamel, D.; Zaniolo, K.; Joyal, J. S.; Cho, J. H.; Honoré,

369

J. C.; Kermorvant-Duchemin, E.; Varma, D. R.; Tremblay. S.; Leduc, M.;

370

Rihakova, L.; Hardy, P.; Klein, W. H.; Mu, X.; Mamer, O.; Lachapelle, P.; Di,

371

Polo, A.; Beauséjour, C.; Andelfinger, G.; Mitchell, G.; Sennlaub, F.; Chemtob, S.

372

The succinate receptor GPR91 in neurons has a major role in retinal angiogenesis.

373

Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 1067-1076. 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 22 of 29

374

31. Volate, S. R.; Davenport, D. M.; Muga, S. J.; Wargovich, M. J., Modulation of

375

aberrant crypt foci and apoptosis by dietary herbal supplements (quercetin,

376

curcumin, silymarin, ginseng and rutin). Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 1450-1456.

377

32. Umesalma, S.; Sudhandiran, G., Ellagic acid prevents rat colon carcinogenesis

378

induced

by

1,

2-dimethyl

hydrazine

through

inhibition

of

379

AKT-phosphoinositide-3 kinase pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 660, 249-258.

380

33. Canani, R.B.; Costanzo, M.D.; Leone, L.; Pedata, M.; Meli, R.; Calignano, A.,

381

Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases.

382

World J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 17, 1519-1528.

383

34. Liu, T.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, N.; Suo, H.; Xie, K.; Yang, C.; Wu, C., Short-chain

384

fatty acids suppress lipopolysaccharide-induced production of nitric oxide and

385

proinflammatory cytokines through inhibition of NF-κB pathway in RAW264.7

386

cells. Inflammation, 2012, 35, 1676-1684.

387

35. Veeriah, S.; Hofmann, T.; Glei, M.; Dietrich, H.; Will, F.; Schreier, P.; Knaup, B.;

388

Pool-Zobel, BL., Apple polyphenols and products formed in the gut differently

389

inhibit survival of human cell lines derived from colon adenoma (LT97) and

390

carcinoma (HT29). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 2892-2900.

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

391

Figure 1.

392

Effects of Succinate on the Growth of HT29 cells.

393

Cultured cells (3.0 × 103 cells/well) were exposed to the medium for 24 h. Cell growth

394

was determined by the MTT assay. Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Significantly

395

different from the control by Dunnet’s multiple-range test (*p < 0.05).

396 397 398 399 400

Figure 2.

401

Effect of Succinate on ex vivo Angiogenesis with the Use of a Rat Aortic Ring.

402

(A-C) Representative result as to the inhibitory effects of succinate. (D) Microvessel

403

length was measured on day 10 of culture. Values are means ± SEM (n = 3, 4).

404

Significantly different from the control by Dunnet’s multiple-range test (*p < 0.01).

405 406 407 408 409

Figure 3.

410

Effect of Succinate on HUVEC Functions. 23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

411

(A) Effect of succinate on HUVEC tube formation on reconstituted basement

412

membrane. Capillary length was measured. Values are means ± SEM (n = 3). (B)

413

Effect of succinate on HUVEC chemotaxis. HUVECs that migrated to the lower

414

surfaces of the filters after 6 h of incubation were counted in three 200x fields of the

415

filters. Means of a field of three filters ± SEM (n = 9) are shown. NC, negative control

416

(medium without VEGF and sample); PC, positive control (VEGF containing medium

417

without sample). (C) Effect of succinate on the growth of HUVEC. Cultured cells (1.5

418

× 103 cells/well) were exposed to the medium for 72 h. Cell growth was determined by

419

the MTT assay. Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Significantly different from the

420

positive control (PC) by Dunnet’s multiple-range test (*p < 0.01).

24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 29

Page 25 of 29

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Table 1. Effects of dietary addition of 0.5% polyphenols on cecal organic acids in rats fed a high-fat diet

Control

Rutin

Ellagic acid

Curcumin

Catechin

Caffeic acid

Quercetin

1.44 ± 0.12

1.83 ± 0.21

2.47± 0.16*

2.50 ± 0.18*

1.81 ± 0.16

1.75 ± 0.15

1.69 ± 0.11

Wet weight of cecal digesta (g) Organic acids (µmol/g wet digesta) Succinate

7.0 ± 1.6

44.5 ± 9.8*

37.4 ± 6.4*

32.5 ± 9.0*

25.1 ± 4.8

23.8 ± 5.7

7.1 ± 3.0

Formate

1.40 ± 0.20

1.48 ± 0.73

0.54 ± 0.26

0.82 ± 0.27

0.99 ± 0.30

1.27 ± 0.31

1.88 ± 0.43

Acetate

24.1 ± 2.3

29.8 ± 2.8

26.6 ± 1.1

26.3 ± 2.1

29.0 ± 2.6

29.6 ± 4.4

35.4 ± 2.0*

Propionate

6.34 ± 0.77

6.55 ± 0.83

6.66 ± 0.52

4.82 ± 0.60

5.18 ± 0.62

6.44 ± 0.74

7.63 ± 0.46

Isobutyrate

1.24 ± 0.20

ND

ND

ND

0.80 ± 0.22

1.34 ± 0.41

0.67 ± 0.18

Butyrate

4.50 ± 0.38

3.60 ± 0.48

2.96 ± 0.36

2.99 ± 0.48

5.99 ± 0.45

5.12 ± 0.98

7.78 ± 0.72*

Isovalerate

1.58 ± 0.14

0.74 ± 0.31

0.78 ± 0.14

1.22 ± 0.34

1.24 ± 0.24

1.33 ± 0.28

0.58 ± 0.10*

Valerate

1.12 ± 0.12

ND

0.32 ± 0.12

0.56 ± 0.24

0.88 ± 0.26

1.01 ± 0.32

ND

Total

46.2 ± 5.0

86.9 ± 8.0*

75.6 ± 6.8*

69.8 ± 7.8

68.3 ± 3.2

70.2 ± 8.0

60.8 ± 5.8

7.15 ± 0.12

6.40 ± 0.27*

6.97 ± 0.12

6.77 ± 0.19

6.71 ± 0.09

6.55 ± 0.20

6.81 ± 0.13

pH

Mean ± SE (n = 7). Significantly different from the control group by Dunnett’s multiple-range test (*p