Characterization of Colombian Agroindustrial Biomass Residues as

Sep 8, 2016 - Characterization of Colombian Agroindustrial Biomass Residues as Energy Resources. Gloria Marrugo†, Carlos F. Valdés†, and Farid Ch...
38 downloads 7 Views 4MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Vanderbilt Libraries

Article

Characterization of Colombian agroindustrial biomass residues as energy resources Gloria Marrugo, Carlos F. Valdés, and Farid Chejne Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01596 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Sep 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 9, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

Characterization of Colombian agroindustrial biomass residues as energy

2

resources

3

Gloria Marrugoa, Carlos F. Valdésa, Farid Chejnea,1

4 a

5

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Mines Faculty, Processes and Energy School, TAYEA Group, Carrera 80 No. 65-223, Medellin (Colombia).

6

7 8

Abstract:

9 10

A physical and chemical characterization of three Colombian agricultural biomass residues

11

was carried out to identify promising feedstocks for thermochemical energy production.

12

The three chosen were sugarcane bagasse (SCB), rice husk (RH) and palm kernel shell

13

(PKS). Results showed that SCB, has high volatile material (87.41 wt.% daf),

14

lignocellulosic composition high in hemicellulose (29.68 wt.% daf) and cellulose (39.81 wt.

15

daf), high alkali index (4.07) and soft morphology; these characteristics make it a good

16

candidate for fast pyrolysis to produce bio-oil and gas. The RH, despite having a

17

lignocellulosic composition similar to SCB, has slightly less volatile matter than SCB

18

(75.73 wt.% daf), a soft morphological structure, and high ash content (19.33 wt.%) mainly

19

of non-catalytic species these characteristics make RH unattractive for pyrolysis; however,

20

its fixed carbon content makes it very interesting for combustion and gasification processes.

21

On the other hand, the PKS is the biomass with the highest content of fixed carbon (22.78

Corresponding author at: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Minas, Escuela de Procesos y Energía, Medellín, Colombia. Email address: [email protected]

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

22

wt.% daf) and lignin (58.30 wt.%); its hard structure, low ash content (2.67 wt.%), and high

23

lignin content make it most suitable for high temperature processes like combustion and

24

gasification processes.

25 26

Keywords: Sugarcane bagasse, rice husk, palm kernel shell, characterization,

27

morphological structure.

28 29

1. Introduction

30 31

Energy supply is one of the greatest concerns in modern society. The demand for energy

32

has driven rapid growth of the use of fossil fuels, depleting the supply and the raising the

33

cost of energy in many places1,2. Additionally, burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse

34

gases that have been blamed for climate change3. With this in mind, traditional

35

technologies are not sustainable. Today there are great efforts to develop renewable and

36

efficient energy production processes. The use of biomass is generally considered a

37

sustainable replacement or partial substitution for fossil fuels since it has a net-neutral

38

production of carbon dioxide.

39

The term “biomass” includes all existing organic matter which is biodegradable and not

40

fossilized. For energy production, there are several sources known to be good feedstocks:

41

wood, short-cycle crops, green waste, forest residues, and agricultural residues.

42

Agricultural residues have been heavily studied for energy generation. Besides their

43

environmental benefits as part of the carbon cycle, it is ensured an economic valuation, they

44

are already part in profitable business models4. In a country like Colombia, high agro-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 40

Page 3 of 40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

45

industrial activity has created a large supply of available biomass that can satisfy the

46

demand for sustainable energy if forestry and agricultural residues are managed well5.

47

Around 72 million ton/year of agricultural residual biomass is thought to exist, indicating

48

an energy potential of around 332,000 TJ/year. A recent study estimates the production of

49

sugarcane bagasse at 7 million tons/year, rice husks at 453,000 ton/year, and palm oil

50

residues at 1.6 million ton/year in Colombia6.

51

To use biomass as an energy resource, it needs to be processed. There are physical

52

processes such as extraction oils, biological processes such as the anaerobic digestion for

53

the production of biogas, and thermochemical processes that provide multiple and complex

54

products in short reaction times7. Among the thermochemical processes, we find pyrolysis,

55

gasification, and combustion. Pyrolysis and gasification have been heavily researched in

56

the last twenty years which has allowed for the use of biomass in applications at small and

57

medium levels for power and thermal energy production4.

58

Biomass comes from various croplands and species and all plants have different chemical

59

compositions 8,9. Thus, it is necessary to carry out fundamental studies on the impacts of

60

these features on energetic processes. Despite a great deal of information published

61

regarding good use of biomass, studies with detailed characterizations are scarce and are

62

limited to databases available from organizations such as the National Renewable Energy

63

Laboratory (NREL)10, and Deutsches Biomasse Forschungs Zentrum (DBFZ). The reports

64

are normally limited to proximate analysis, ultimate analysis, and energy content11–13.

65

Lignocellulosic characterization is important for knowing the effects of composition on

66

reaction kinetics9,14,15 and other process parameters9 during thermochemical conversion.

67

Characterization tools such as XRD (X-ray diffraction), XRF (X-ray fluorescence), SEM

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

68

(scanning electron microscopy), and gas adsorption studies provide the surface area and

69

morphological structure. Many studies present this information in an isolated form or with

70

a very specific purpose15–20 Combining all available information is critical to fully

71

understand the phenomena that control energy production processes.

72 73

In this manuscript, the authors present full physicochemical characterizations for three

74

relevant Colombian agro-industrial biomasses: sugar cane bagasse, rice husk, kernel palm

75

shell. Lignocellulosic composition and XRD analyses are presented as tools to assess the

76

influence that the lignocellulosic components have on thermochemical conversion. XRF

77

analysis was performed to quantify metallic species, making use of the alkali index. BET

78

surface area was determined and morphological properties were studied via optical

79

microscopy (transmitted and reflected). Combination of this data led to conclusions

80

regarding the catalytic reactivity of the surface of the biomass. The authors propose that

81

these characterizations are fundamental tools for the qualification and quantification of the

82

effects of a biomass’ structure and physiochemical composition on thermochemical

83

processes such as pyrolysis, gasification, and combustion.

84 85

2. Materials and methods

86 87

2.1

Biomass selection, characterization and preliminary preparation

88 89

For the selection of biomasses for this study, several criteria were taken into consideration.

90

In the literature it is common to limit this election to abundance and availability. In

91

Colombia where there is a wide variety of agro-industrial materials, this criteria does not

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 40

Page 5 of 40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

92

refine the selection to the requirements of the end use, like in the most of the cases21; the

93

operability and process yields are dependent on the feedstock selected. In this study, three

94

Colombian agro-industrial residues were selected, taking into consideration availability,

95

energy content, and of course differences in its physicochemical characteristics in order to

96

predict their behaviors in thermochemical transformation processes.

97 98

Once selected, a general characterization of the samples was carried-out as they were

99

received; sampling and quartering was performed to obtain a characteristics and

100

representatives samples. Apparent density was determined making use of a graduated

101

cylinder and the weight of the material in a certain volume. Moisture content was

102

measuring by using a halogen moisture balance (Metter Toledo HB43-S) with a heating

103

method programmed up to 110°C and holding at this temperature, until ensuring an

104

unchanging weight. Later, biomass samples were subjected to the preparation process that

105

included solar drying, grinding with a hammer mill at 6500 rpm, and classification of

106

particle size using ASTM E11-87 series sieves, defined by the ranges -12/+20

107

(average/diameter, Dp,m = 1.27 mm), -20/+30 (Dp,m = 0.73 mm) and passing mesh 30

108

(Dp,m < 0.60 mm).

109 110

2.2

Physicochemical biomass characterization methodologies

111 112

Due to the inherent compositional and structural complexity of the biomass, a complete

113

characterization of the biomass through multiple analyses is fundamental; this will allow

114

researchers to establish relations between its characteristics and the behavior during

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

115

thermochemical energy production processes. Analyses were performed on biomass after

116

drying and size reduction.

117 118

The particle analysis was done with the morphological structure features of each biomass

119

through optic microscopy with light transmitted/reflected (OM) as well as scanning

120

electron microscopy (SEM). Using these techniques it was possible to determine the effect

121

of milling on the destruction of basic structures of the biomasses. For the selection of a

122

distribution of particle size it is important to consider the type of technology to use.

123 124

2.2.1

Proximate analysis, calorific value and ultimate analysis

125 126

The proximate analysis methods included: moisture (ASTM D3173-11), ash (ASTM

127

D3174-12), volatile matter (ASTM D3175–11), and fixed carbon (ASTM D3172)22. For the

128

high heating value (PCS or HHV) the procedures describe in ASTM D5865-13 guidelines

129

were used. The determination of the C, H, N, content was carried-out using guidelines

130

ASTM D5373-14, and sulfur with ASTM D4239-14 Method A and finally the oxygen

131

content was determined by difference (subtracting from 100% of the CHNS content and the

132

ash content).

133 134

2.2.2

Lignocellulosic compositional analysis

135 136

The content of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin present in the biomass was measured

137

following NREL/TP-510-42618. Additionally, the content of total solids (NREL/TP-510-

138

42621) and ash (NREL/TP-510-42622) were determined23.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 40

Page 7 of 40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

139 140

2.2.3

Ash speciation analysis

141 142

The biomass ash characterization allows us to identify mineral species present in the form

143

of oxides. The analysis was carried-out with a X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (Thermo

144

Model OPTIM’X). The biomasses were size reduced to 250 microns and calcinated at

145

750°C for one hour. Then, the ashes were used for the quantification of minerals, which

146

allow the identification of nearly 100% of the mineralogical composition of calcinated

147

residue.

148 149

2.2.4

BET area and microporosity

150 151

The determination of the surface area was done by absorption of N2 at different pressure

152

levels in a Micrometrics TriStar II Plus. The samples were vacuum de-gassed at 150°C for

153

24 hours before the analysis in order to remove moisture. The total surface area was

154

calculated using the BET multi-layer absorption model24. Similarly, the smallest

155

microporosity of biomass was analyzed by CO2 adsorption using the Dubbini - Astakhov

156

model25.

157 158

2.2.5

FTIR analysis

159 160

Identification of the main functional groups present in the structure of the biomass was

161

carried-out using a Fourier transformed infrared spectrometry (FTIR) in a Perkin Elmer

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 40

162

Spectrum Two device. With the infrared spectrum, functional groups were identified and

163

differences between biomass species were established.

164 165

2.2.6

X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

166 167

Biomass samples were analyzed in an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Cu-kα to 40 kV

168

and 30 mA). The measures were taken from an initial angle of 2θ = 5° to a final angle of

169

90°. With this technique, we can determine the crystallinity of the lignocellulosic biomass.

170

The degree of crystallinity represents the relative amount of crystalline cellulose. It is

171

strongly influence by the composition of the biomass, since the relative amount of lignin,

172

hemicellulose, and cellulose varies between biomasses19. The crystallinity index (ICr) was

173

obtained between the intensity of the peak of 002 (I200, 2θ = 22.5°) and the minimum

174

intensity (Iam, 2θ = 18°), according to the formula used by the Segal Method26 in Eq. 1:

175

ICr =

(I − I ) x100 I

Eq.1

176 177

2.2.7

Optical Microphotography

178 179

A characterization of the physical structure of the biomass was carried-out with a particle

180

size of 1.00, 0.73 y hemicellulose), their physical structures are quite different; the SCB

354

appears in the form of thin fibers while the RH is in the form of sheets covered by a cuticle

355

that makes them brittle to the touch.

356 357

The RH has less cellulose and a little more lignin than the SCB. The content of

358

hemicellulose is lowest for PKS (14.63 wt.% daf) and higher for SCB and RH (~25 wt.%

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 40

Page 17 of 40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

359

daf). The proportions of these components are similar to those presented in the studies

360

reported for the SCB, the RH and the PKS, see Table 3.

361 362

Table 3. Physicochemical characterization of biomasses from different countries Biomass

363 364 365

Origen VM FC A C S O Hem Cel Lig In this study 87.47 12.59 12.34 51.34 0.14 50.68 14.63 53.18 32.19 Malaysia39 81.32 25.27 3.00 45.10 0.04 49.20 Pakistan40 85.97 14.03 5.20 46.19 45.74 South Africa41 81.20 18.80 5.30 50.30 0.07 43.10 Morocco42 88.72 11.28 2.70 52.99 49.92 Brazil43 1.44 26.83 41.38 31.79 Florida44 83.43 16.57 1.60 49.60 43.90 Brazil45 20.90 29.91 42.98 27.11 SCB Indonesia46 83.83 16.17 2.10 51.71 42.64 General mean47 4.5-9 27-32 32-34 19-24 Colombia. Valle48 90.86 9.14 3.90 51.29 0.10 47.72 32.99 43.55 21.76 Malaysia49 57.03 42.97 10.20 42.80 0.03 47.10 30.67 40.00 29.33 Bombay. India50 84.20 2.90 45.11 48.51 27.50 50.20 22.30 California. EEUU51 87.75 12.25 2.44 49.86 0.04 43.58 India52 92.13 7.87 6.00 47.19 0.02 57.46 India. Mathura53 88.78 11.22 4.40 50.47 1.24 35.67 24.04 47.04 28.92 In this study 75.73 24.27 19.33 45.93 0.16 55.97 24.50 39.65 35.84 Thailand54 73.45 26.55 14.00 50.20 0.08 42.80 India55 88.65 11.33 19.36 49.90 52.25 Asia56 5.98 68.64 25.39 India. Mathura53 87.91 12.09 17.40 54.67 0.34 30.76 18.76 43.72 37.52 Uganda. Mean57 79.39 20.62 21.98 40.88 0.03 51.99 18.00 23.80 58.30 RH Brazil58 82.19 17.81 13.00 48.94 0.00 37.47 Canada59 83.00 17.00 20.00 47.00 0.04 45.70 29.00 42.14 28.86 China60 80.38 19.64 17.09 50.47 64.52 Bombay. India50 81.60 23.50 50.85 41.83 34.80 44.80 20.40 California. EEUU51 79.66 20.34 20.26 48.70 0.06 44.48 Colombia59 79.73 20.30 17.89 51.76 0.60 44.09 39.04 22.80 In this study 77.22 22.78 2.67 51.27 0.16 50.55 27.06 14.64 58.30 Netherlands61 81.47 18.54 5.14 50.96 0.27 39.47 Nigeria62 8.68 54.52