Chlorodecaboranes Identified as 1-ClB10H13 and 2-ClB10H13 by

William C. Ewing , Patrick J. Carroll and Larry G. Sneddon. Inorganic Chemistry 2008 47 (19), 8580-8582. Abstract | Full Text HTML | PDF | PDF w/ Link...
0 downloads 0 Views 202KB Size
Vol. 4 , No. 9, September 1965

NOTES 135‘7

fluoroalkanes have also been observed to undergo a similar reaction.6 The mechanism of the halogenation of decaborane by haloalkanes, however, remains unclear. There is one possibly related reaction among aliphatic compounds. Brewer’ has found that cycloalkanes react with alkyl halides in the presence of aluminum chloride to give the corresponding cycloalkyl halide and alkane. This reaction is probably due t o the concerted abstraction of a hydride ion from the cycloalkane and reaction with the alkyl halide-aluminum chloride complex. This reaction can account for the similar formation of chlorodecaborane, but analogous reactions involving hydride abstraction from decaborane are apparently unknown. The ethyl chloride that is formed as a by-product, however, is then available for alkylation to give the mono-, di-, and triethylchlorodecaborane and the hydrogen chloride also observed as products of the reaction. By means of high resolution n.m.r., and using the samples prepared above, WilliamsBhas recently shown that the chlorine atoms in the two isomers are in the same positions as the iodine atoms resulting from electrophilic iodination of decaborane, namely the 1 and 2 positions. This indicates either that the chlorination reaction is an electrophilic reaction or that the best candidates for hydride abstraction are in the same positions. The latter is consistent with the fact that except for negatively charged bridge hydrogen atoms, the most negatively charged hydrogen atoms should be bonded to the most electron-rich boron atoms. The above mechanism is offered only as a possibility since firm evidence is still lacking.

t i ~ e l y ) ,2-BrBloH13,~ ~ l-BrB5Hs,2 1-IB5H8,2 2-C1BsHR,4 1-BrB2H5,61-C1BzH5.7 2-BrB4HQJ5 Recent n.m.r. studies with experimental nuclear magnetic resonance equipmenta capable of obtaining B1l n.m.r. spectra a t 64.2 Mc. allow us t o add 1-C1B10H.13 and 2-ClB10H13 to the above list. The preparation of these species were published by Hillman and Mang~ld.~ Substitution of a single C1 for a single terminal hydrogen in a boron hydride collapses the substituted boron resonance and chemically shifts i t to lower field in the cases previously encountered, ie., l-ClB2H6, and A rationale that this should be the case 2-C1B~H~.l0 with all approximately sp3 hybridized boron nuclei will be published el~ewhere.~In contrast, C1 replacement of hydrogen in an sp2 molecule or I replacement of hydrogen in either sp3 or sp2hybridized species shifts the resonance to higher field.7 In Figure 1 are displayed top to bottom the B” 64.2-Mc. spectral1of a mixture of 1- C ~ B I ~ Hand I ~ 2-ClB10H13, B10H14, and 1-C1B13H13. The 2, 4, 5 , 7, 8, and 10 positions of BloHl4 had been l 2 previously; however, SchaeffeP and coassigned1$2t workers have unambiguously identified the lowest field doublet as representing the 1 and 3 positions; thus the Bll spectral assignment for &OH14 is now complete. The spectrum of l-ClBloH13 (m.p. 7 3 ” ) is almost selfexplanatory, since the spectrum is in such great detail a t 64.2 Mc. Onak and Dunks4 observed that C1 substitutions (in 2-ClBsH8) not only shifted boron to lower field but also that boron positioned diagonally across the base (nonadjacent) was chemically shifted to higher field. Substitution of C1 on the 2, 5 , or 6 posi(6) A. L. Henne and M . S. Newman, J . A m . Chem. Sac.. 60, 1697 (1938), D. J. Burton, Dissertation Abslv., 22, 2190 (1062). tions in B10H14 would create seven, ten, and seven (7) C. P. Brewer and B. S. Greensfelder, J . A m . Chem. Sac., 73, 2257 “kinds” of boron, respectively, in a variety of ratios. (1951). (8) R. E. Williams and E. Pier, Znovg Chem., 4, 1357 (1965). Substitution in the 1 position, however, would create six kinds of boron in the specific ratio 1 : 1 : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 representing positions 1 alone, 3 alone, 5 and 10, 6 and 9, 7 and 8, and 2 and 4. I n the lowest spectrum of Figure 1, two doublets of ratio 2 are evidently overCONTRIBUTION FROM SPACE-GENERAL CORPORATION, lapped into a triplet a t 64.2 Mc. and substitution in the EL MONTE,CALIFORNIA, 1 position is required. The assignment in Figure 1 of AND VARIAN ASSOCIATES, PALO ALTO,CALIFORNIA the 5, 7 ; 6, 9; and 7, 8 doublets is tentative. The “other” B“ spectrum shows the spectrum expected of 2-ClB10H~~-collapseof a portion of the Chlorodecaboranes Identified as high-field doublet and the predicted’ shift to lower 1-C1BIOHl3 and 2-C1BlCH13 by 64.2-Mc. Bll field. However, the presence of an even greater amount

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra BY ROBERTE. WILLIAMSAND EUGENEPIER Received February 22,1965

A variety of halogen derivatives of B2H6, B4H10,B ~ H Q , and B1QH14have been prepared and in a number of cases their structures have been deduced from (or a t least correlated with) their n.m.r. spectra, e.g. 2,4ls2 2-1B10H13, I-IBIoHI~, 1,2-I2B10H12(tenta12B10H12~ (1) R. Schaeffer, J . A m . Chem. Sac., 79, 2726 (1957). ( 2 ) R. Schaeffer,J. N. Shoolery, and R. Jones, ibid., 80, 2670 (1955). ( 3 ) R. E. Williams and T. P. Onak. ibid., 86, 3159 (1964).

(4) T. P. Onak and G. B. Dunks, Inoug. Chem., 8 , 1060 (1964). (5) 1. Dobson and R. Schaeffer, ibid., 4, 593 (1965). (6) D. F. Gaines and R.Schaeffer, J. Phys. Chem., 68, 955 (1964). (7) R. E. Williams, K. M. Harmon, and 1. R. Spielman, submitted f o r publication. (8) F. A. Nelson and H. E. Weaver, Science. 146, 223 (1964). (9) M. Hillman and D. J. Mangold, Znovg. Chem., 4 , 1356 (1965). (IO) A referee points out t h a t this generality does not hold when extensive or greatly differing species are compared; e.g.. the apex boron nuclei of BioClio2- and BioBrio2- arp found at higher field than the apex boron nuclei in H. Knoth, et al., ibid., 3, 161 (1964). BioHio2- (W. (11) These spectra are obtained a t the same sweep rate and the 24 positions were found to be superpositioned at 12.5 Mc., thus the spectra are comparable but no reference compound was utilized. (12) R. E. Williams and 1. Shapiro, J. Chem. Phys., 29, 677 (1955). (13) R. Schaeffer, private communication.

1358 NOTES

Inorganic Chemistry

Figure l.-BX1 n.m.r. spectra (64.2 Mc.) of a l - C I B , ~ H Iand ~ 2-ClBloHla mixture, BIOHII, and pure 1-C1BIOHI3 in CS2 solution.

of l-ClB10H13is detected. Thus, the presumed CIB10H13 isomer (m.p. 59') is in reality a mixture of two isomers. It had been demonstrated that 2-IBlaH13 melts

higher (116°,2 117" 14) than l-IBlOH13 (72°,2 98" 1 4 ) . l-ClB1OHIs melts at 73") pure 2-ClB10H13 would be expected to have a higher melting point; however: mixtures rich in 1-ClB1aHl3may be expected to have lower melting points, thus accounting for the ( S $ ) O ) point of the 2-C1BloH13-containingmixture. Acknowledgment.-This research was supported by the Ofice of Naval Research. We also express our appreciation to Drs. Manny Hillman and L). T. Mangild, who furnished the samples of CIBloHla,to Prof. Riley Schaeffer, who revealedL3t o US the Cornlete R1' n.m.r. assignment of B10Hl4. ( I I) A I . l l i l l n i u i , J .

Aiii.

ChPiir. S o r , 82, IOM ( I l l h O ) .

COSTRIBUTION FROM THIOKOL CHEMICAL CORPORATIOX, REACTIOX MOTORS DIVISION,DENVILLE, NEWJERSEY

The Chemistry of Alane. V.' N,N,N',N'-Tetramethylpropanediamine Alane' BY

.ARCHIE

K.

\'OIJXG,

11, A S D

ROBERT E H R T J C H

Keceioed Octobev 1 2 , 1964

Davidson and Wartik3 have reported the synthesis of a dimeric, 1: 1 complex of N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-

53&)(cg:A. R.Young. IV:

11, and K . I.:hrlich, J . A m . Chem. S O L . ,8 6 ,

(2) This research was supported by the Advanced Research Projects Agency under ARPA Order No. 24-60 and by the Air Force Flight Test Center. Air Force Svstems Command. Edwards Air Force Base. Calif.. u n d e r Contract AF33(616)-5935 (1960). ( 3 ) J . hi. Davidson and T. \V&rtik, .T. A m . Lheiit. Soc., 82, 5.506 (1!)6O)