Subscriber access provided by UB + Fachbibliothek Chemie | (FU-Bibliothekssystem)
Article
Effect of pasteurization on flavonoids and carotenoids in Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck cv. «Cara Cara» and «Bahia» juices Elisa Brasili, Daniela F. Seixas Chaves, Ana Augusta Odorissi Xavier, Adriana Zerlotti Mercadante, Neuza Mariko Aymoto Hassimotto, and Franco Maria Lajolo J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05401 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Feb 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 3, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Effect of pasteurization on flavonoids and carotenoids in Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck cv. «Cara Cara» and «Bahia» juices
Elisa Brasili*†1,2, Daniela F. Seixas Chaves†1,2, Ana Augusta O. Xavier3, Adriana Z. Mercadante2,3, Neuza MA. Hassimotto1,2, Franco M. Lajolo1,2
1
Department of Food Science and Experimental Nutrition, School of Pharmaceutical Science,
University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 2
Food Research Center (FoRC), CEPID-FAPESP (Research Innovation and Dissemination
Centers São Paulo Research Foundation), São Paulo, Brazil. 3
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas,
Campinas, SP, Brazil
Corresponding author: *(E.B) Phone: (+55) 11-30910128. Fax: (+55) 11-3815 4410. E-mail:
[email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 30
1
Keywords: Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck, Cara Cara orange juice, Bahia orange juice,
2
carotenoids, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity, LC-MS/MS
3 4
ABSTRACT
5
Orange juice is considered an excellent dietary source of several bioactive compounds with
6
beneficial properties for human health. Citrus sinensis Osbeck cv. “Cara Cara” is a bud
7
mutation originated from “Washington” navel orange, also known as “Bahia” navel orange.
8
The ascorbic acid, flavonoid and carotenoid contents in pasteurized and non-pasteurized
9
Bahia and Cara Cara juices using two LC-MS/MS platforms were investigated. Higher
10
ascorbic acid content was observed in Bahia compared to Cara Cara in both pasteurized and
11
non-pasteurized juices. Total flavanones content as well as hesperidin levels were higher in
12
Cara Cara with respect to Bahia pasteurized juice. Cara Cara was also characterized by a
13
significantly higher and diversified carotenoid content compared to Bahia juice with a
14
mixture of (Z)-isomers of lycopene, all- E-β-carotene, phytoene and phytofluene isomers
15
accounting for the highest carotenoid proportion. The exceptional high carotenoid content of
16
Cara Cara may be particularly interesting for nutritional or functional studies of uncommon
17
carotenes in a citrus food matrix.
18 19 20 21 22 23 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
24
INTRODUCTION
25
Orange is one of most consumed fruit in the world. Global production in 2012 exceeded 86
26
million metric tons, with an estimated value of $9 billion.1 According to 2015-2016 data from
27
the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Brazil is the world´s
28
largest producer of oranges with 16.8 million tonnes (Mt) per years, accounting for 50% of
29
global production and more than 80% of global exports of the product.2 This production is
30
expected to increase in the coming decade reaching 17.5 Mt in the period of 2023/24. More
31
than 70% of the Brazilian orange fruits are used in the production of juices.
32
Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck orange juice is considered an excellent dietary source of several
33
bioactive compounds with beneficial properties for human health. Numerous epidemiological
34
and intervention studies have provided evidence to support an inverse correlation between the
35
orange juice intake and the occurrence of cardiovascular disease, cancer and aging-related
36
disorders.3,4 In addition to vitamin C, orange juice contains flavonoids, carotenoids, sugars,
37
minerals and fibre. The most abundant flavonoid species that have been identified and
38
quantified in Citrus species, regardless of variety, are hesperidin, narirutin and didymin5 that
39
possess well-known anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticarcinogenic and antiproliferative
40
properties.6-8 Orange juice is also rich in carotenoids, a widespread family of natural
41
pigments which provide attractive coloration to flowers and fruits, ranging from yellow,
42
orange to deep red.9,10 Their importance as nutritional components is also well recognized,
43
since specific carotenoids are precursors of vitamin A (e.g. β-carotene, α-carotene and β-
44
cryptoxanthin) and own antioxidant properties11 which could confer to them a protective role
45
in cancer and cardiovascular disease prevention.4
46
It is noteworthy that the distribution and composition of these bioactive compounds differ
47
significantly among cultivars and are also affected by technological processing which
48
impacts on the enzyme activity, potentially changing the chemical composition of orange 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 30
49
juice.12 Despite its low pH, fresh orange juice stability is rather limited, due to microbial
50
growth and enzyme activities. To prolong this shelf life, thermal pasteurization is the most
51
widely applied technique due to its low cost, efficacy in inactivating vegetative
52
microorganisms and enzymes, and for its environmental-friendly nature.13
53
In Brazil, among sweet oranges, it is increasing the interest in Citrus sinensis Osbeck cv.
54
Cara Cara, a bud mutation originated in Venezuela in the 80s from “Washington” navel
55
orange14, also known as “Bahia” navel orange for the Brazilian city from which it was
56
exported into the United States in 1870, according to USDA- ARS National Clonal
57
Germplasm Repository for Citrus (University of California, Riverside).
58
Cara Cara orange pulp is characterized by a bright red coloration which resembles that of
59
pink and red grapefruits. Previous studies have indicated that this deeply coloured flesh is
60
associated with a high content of lycopene accumulated in the juice vesicles.9,10,14-16
61
Nevertheless, the presence of lycopene is an unusual feature in most citrus fruits since has
62
been reported in few orange species,17,18 but is of special interest due to recent nutritional
63
studies that have demonstrated its important role in reduction of cardiovascular disease.19 In
64
Brazil, orange juice cv. Cara Cara is not yet commercially available, although there is an
65
increasingly great interest to introduce this cultivar in orange fruit market. Up to date, there
66
are no data about the bioactive compounds composition and antioxidant capacity of
67
pasteurized and non-pasteurized orange juice from Cara Cara and Bahia cultivars. The main
68
objective of this study was to assess and compare the effect of the thermal pasteurisation on
69
flavonoid and carotenoid contents as well as on the antioxidant capacity of orange juice cv.
70
Cara Cara with respect to orange juice cv. Bahia.
71 72
MATERIAL AND METHODS
73
Samples 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
74
Pasteurized and non-pasteurized orange juices obtained from Citrus sinensis L. cv. Cara Cara
75
and Bahia were provided by Fundecitrus company (São Paulo, Brazil). Oranges from both
76
cultivars were collected in Araraquara (São Paulo, Brazil) located in Southeast region of São
77
Paulo at 23°23’19’’ S and 48°43’22’’ W with an elevation of 600 meters above sea level. The
78
fully-mature fruits were hand harvested in July 2015 and then stored at 4 °C for 7 days.
79
Orange juices were obtained by cutting and squeezing, using an industrial extractor (model
80
391, JBT). The pasteurization process was achieved in an industrial pasteurizer (UHT/HTST
81
Lab- 25DH, MicroThermics) at 92-94 °C for 17 s (750 mL/minute). After processing, the
82
juices were filled into 1L plastic flasks and cooled to 1°C. All juices were immediately stored
83
at -20 °C until further analysis. Subsequently, samples were centrifuged at 8000 g at 4 °C for
84
10 min and the obtained supernatant and pellet were utilized for further chemical analysis.
85 86
Chemicals
87
Fluorescein,
88
diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH), dithiothreitol, dehydro-ascorbic acid, trifluoroacetic acid,
89
sucrose, glucose, fructose, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
90
Narirutin, hesperidin and didymin were obtained from Extrasynthese (Genay, France). Folin-
91
Ciocalteu reagent, sodium acetate, methanol, metaphosphoric and acetic acid were obtained
92
from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). The carotenoid standards (all-E)-lutein, (all-
93
E)-zeaxanthin, (all-E)-β-cryptoxanthin, (all-E)-α-carotene, (all-E)-β-carotene were obtained
94
from DSM Nutritional Products (Basel, Switzerland), and (all-E)-violaxanthin, (all-E)-
95
antheraxanthin and (9ʹZ)-neoxanthin from CaroteNature (Lupsingen, Switzerland).
2,2′-azobis(2-methyl-propanimidamide)dihydrochloride
(AAPH),
2,2-
96 97
Determination of pH and Total Soluble Solids (TSS)
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 30
98
The pH of orange juices was measured using an Metrohm pH meter (model 827, Switzerland)
99
at room temperature. The total soluble solids content in the orange juice samples was
100
determined using a digital refractometer (Krüss, Germany). The obtained values were
101
reported as °Brix.
102 103
Analysis of Ascorbic Acid Content
104
Ascorbic acid content was determined according to the method of Rizzolo et al. (1984).20
105
Ascorbic acid was extracted with metaphosphoric acid (0.3% w/v) and analysed by reversed-
106
phase HPLC, in a Hewlett-Packard 1100 system, with an auto-sampler and a quaternary
107
pump, coupled to a diode array detector. The column used was a µ-Bondapack (300 mm x 3.9
108
mm i.d., Waters, Milford, MA, USA) column, and elution (flow rate of 1.5 mL/minute) was
109
carried out in isocratic conditions with 0.2 M sodium acetate/acetic acid buffer (pH 4.2),
110
monitored at 262 nm. Total ascorbic acid was estimated after reduction of dehydro-ascorbic
111
acid (DHA) with 10 mM dithiothreitol, with a calibration curve of ascorbic acid (0−600
112
mg/L).
113 114
Analysis of Total Phenolic Content
115
The total phenolic content of samples was determined using the Folin−Ciocalteu colorimetric
116
method described by Singleton and Rossi (1965)21 with some modifications. A previously
117
shaken sample of orange juice (2 mL) was added to 10 mL of methanol:water (80:20, v/v).
118
The sample was vortexed for 1 min and then placed to an ultrasonic bath (15 min) according
119
to the procedure described by Stella et al. (2011).22 Afterwards, the samples were centrifuged
120
at 10000g during 15 min at 20°C and supernatants were filtered by a Whatman filter and
121
analysed. The absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 763 nm. Measurements
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
122
were recorded on an UV−vis spectrophotometer Helios Epsilon (Thermo Scientific, Madison,
123
WI, USA). The results were expressed as milligrams of gallic acid/100 mL of orange juice.
124 125
Identification and Quantification of Flavonoids
126
Flavonoid identification and quantification was performed according to the method of
127
Hassimotto et al. (2005)23, with slight modifications. Briefly, 5 mL of orange juice was
128
centrifuged for 10 min (7000 g, 4 ºC). An aliquot of the supernatant (1 mL) was filtered by a
129
0.45 µm PVDF Millex filter (Millipore, Tokyo, Japan) and directly injected (10 µl) in the
130
equipment. The pellet was added to 10 mL of DMSO, homogenized for 18 h and then
131
centrifuged and filtered as previously described. Samples were quantified using a 1260
132
Infinity Quaternary LC System (Agilent Technologies, USA) with an autosampler and a
133
quaternary pump, coupled to a diode array detector (DAD). Separation of the analytes was
134
achieved on a column Prodigy 5 µm ODS3 reversed-phase silica (250 mm x 4.60 mm)
135
(Phenomenex Ltd., United Kingdom) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 25 °C. The mobile
136
phase consisted of 0.5% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.5% formic acid in acetonitrile
137
(solvent B). The solvent gradient was applied as follows: 8% B at the beginning, 10% at 5
138
min, 17% at 10 min, 25% at 15 min, 50% at 25 min, 90% at 30 min, 50% at 32 min, 8% at 35
139
min (run time, 35 min).24,25 The eluates were monitored at 270 and 525 nm. Peak
140
identification was carried out by the combined information provided by comparison of
141
retention times, diode array spectral characteristics and mass spectra, measured by LC-ESI-
142
MS/MS, with the standards and the data available in the literature. The equipment of LC-ESI-
143
MS/MS was a Prominence liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Japan) linked to an ion trap
144
mass analyzer (Esquire, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) with an electrospray
145
ionization (ESI) interface in negative mode for flavonoids. The solvent gradient conditions
146
were the same as those used for the HPLC-DAD process. After passing through the DAD, the
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 30
147
flow rate was changed to 0.2 mL/min for application to the mass spectrometer. The mass
148
spectrometer operating conditions were as follows: collision energy was 4000 V and capillary
149
temperature was 275 °C. The analysis was carried out using a full scan from m/z 100 to 1500.
150
Quantification was done by calibration curves of narirutin, hesperidin and didymin.
151 152
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Carotenoids
153
Approximately 2 g of orange juice was exhaustively extracted with acetone according to De
154
Rosso & Mercadante.26 The solid residue retained in the filter was transferred to the mortar
155
and re-extracted until the extract became colorless (4 times). The extract was transferred to
156
petroleum ether/diethyl ether and saponified overnight at room temperature using 10% KOH
157
in methanol. The saponified extract was abundantly washed with deionized water until pH 7,
158
the solvent was evaporated to dryness and the dry extract was stored at -35 °C until analysis.
159
The carotenoids were separated by LC-DAD-MS/MS on a C30 YMC column (5 µm, 250 mm
160
x 4.6 mm), using as mobile phase a gradient of methanol and t-methyl butyl ether from 95:5
161
to 70:30 in 30 min, followed by 50:50 in 20 min, maintaining this condition for 25 min. The
162
flow was 0.9 mL/min, and the column temperature was set as 29 °C. The equipment was a
163
HPLC Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a quaternary pump (LC-20AD), degasser
164
(DGU- 20A5), Rheodyne injection valve (20 µL loop, Rohnert Park, CA, USA), coupled in
165
series to a diode array detector (DAD) (SPDM20A) and a mass spectrometer with an ion trap
166
analyser with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) source (AmaZon Speed ETD,
167
Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The MS conditions were: APCI positive mode, corona
168
current of 4000 nA, source temperature of 450 °C, dry gas (N2) temperature of 350 °C at 5
169
L/min, nebulizer at 60 psi. Identification was carried out through analysis of characteristics of
170
UV-Vis and MS/MS spectra and comparison with standards. Quantification was done by
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 30
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
171
calibration curves of (all-E)-lycopene, (all-E)-β-carotene, (all-E)-α-carotene, (all-E)-β-
172
cryptoxanthin, (all-E)-lutein, and (all-E)-zeaxanthin.
173 174
Antioxidant Capacity Assay
175
Antioxidant capacity of hydrophilic and lipophilic fractions was evaluated by Oxygen
176
Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) assay and Radical Scavenging (DPPH) assay. ORAC
177
assay was done according to Prior et al.27 All reagents were prepared in phosphate buffer (75
178
mM, pH 7.0). Briefly, 25 µL of diluted sample (1:300) was added to 150 µL of sodium
179
fluorescein (40 nM) and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, 0.6 mL of AAPH
180
(4mM) as a peroxyl radical generator and Trolox as a control standard were added, and the
181
fluorescence was read with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength
182
of 520 nm, every 5 min for 120 min. Final results were calculated from a standard curve
183
using different concentrations of Trolox (12.5 − 100 µM) and expressed in mmol Trolox
184
equivalent. Measurements were recorded on a SynergyTM HT-multimode microplate reader
185
(Biotek Instrumental Winooki, EUA).
186
The DPPH assay was carried out according to the method described by Brand-Williams et
187
al.28 with modifications. A 0.1 mM solution of DPPH (1,1- diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) in
188
methanol was prepared. An aliquot of 50 µL of deproteinated sample was added to 150 µL of
189
this solution. The decrease in absorbance was determined at 517 nm using a microplate
190
spectrophotometer (Benchmark Plus, Biorad, Hercules, CA) when the reaction reached a
191
plateau (after 20 min). The area under the curve was calculated. The results were expressed
192
as mmol Trolox equivalents.
193 194
Soluble Sugar Content and Total Fibre determination
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 30
195
Sugar content was determined according to Shiga et al.29 Samples were extracted three times
196
with 80% ethanol (v/v) at 80 °C for 30 min under stirring. After centrifugation, the
197
supernatants were evaporated under vacuum. The residues were reconstituted with water,
198
filtered through 0.22 µm membrane filters and analysed by LC coupled to a pulse
199
amperometric detector (PAD) using a one-Dionex DX500 system (Dionex, Thermo
200
Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), equipped with a CarboPac PA1 column (4 mm × 250 mm)
201
(Dionex). The mobile phase consisted of 18 mM NaOH, at flow rate was of 1 mL/min for 25
202
min. The quantification was based on an external calibration using sucrose, glucose, and
203
fructose.
204
The fibre content was measured according to AOAC Official Methods 991.43 and 2009.01.30
205 206
Statistical Analysis
207
All analyses were performed in triplicate. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation
208
(SD). The comparisons between pasteurized and non-pasteurized juices from both cultivars
209
were carried out using univariate unpaired Student’s t test and analysis of variance (one-way
210
ANOVA) followed by Holm-Sidak test. The assessment of data normality was performed by
211
the Shapiro-Wilk test. Values p