Colloidal Metal−Insulator−Metal Ensemble Chemiresistor Sensor

The following solutions were prepared in acid-cleaned glassware: (C8H17)4NBr (4.56 g, 83.4 mmol)/toluene (167 mL); HAuCl4·3H2O (0.8025 g, 2.04 mmol)/...
1 downloads 4 Views 109KB Size
Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2856-2859

Colloidal Metal-Insulator-Metal Ensemble Chemiresistor Sensor Hank Wohltjen*

Microsensor Systems, Inc., 62 Corporate Court, Bowling Green, Kentucky 42103 Arthur W. Snow

U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6120, Washington, D.C. 20375

A colloidal metal-insulator-metal ensemble chemiresistor sensor based on a monolayer stabilized metal nanocluster transducer film is described. In the example presented, the thin transducer film is composed of 2-nm gold clusters encapsulated by octanethiol monolayers and is deposited on an interdigital microelectrode. Responses to organic vapor exposures are large (resistance changes up to 2-fold or more), fast (90% response in less than 1 s), reversible, and selective. Chemiresistor sorption isotherms for toluene, tetrachloroethylene, 1-propanol, and water vapors are nonlinear and illustrate the high sensitivity and selectivity (ppm detection for toluene and tetrachloroethylene; negligible response for 1-propanol and water). Chemiresistors are simple solid-state devices whose electrical resistance is changed by the presence of a chemical species. They typically incorporate a thin film of a semiconducting material deposited onto a pair of contacting electrodes.1 Reports of such devices date back to the 1960s,2 and thin films of organic3 and polymeric4 materials have been employed as transducers. Typically, the interaction between the vapor and semiconductor involves a transfer of charge that strongly affects the number of electrons in the conduction band of the semiconductor film. The requirement for charge transfer limits the sensor response to suitable electron donor or acceptor species which may or may not be reversible depending on the strength of the interaction. More recently transducer films based on composites of micrometersize conductive fillers (vanadium oxide or carbon black) loaded into organic polymer matrixes (polyethylene, polystyrene, poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinyl chloride), etc.) that rely on measurement of electrical conductivity changes caused by vapor-induced swelling of the polymer have been reported with encourgaging results.5-8 (1) Wohltjen, H.; Barger, W. R.; Snow, A. W.; Jarvis, N. L. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices, 1985, ED-32(7), 1170. (2) Byrd, N. R. Space Cabin Atmosphere Contaminent Measurement Techniques Contract NAS12-15, NASA Electronics Research Center, Cambridge, MA, Report SM-48446-F, NASA CR-86047, July 1968. (3) Janata, J.; Bezegh, A. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 62R. (4) Pearce, T. C.; Gargner, J. W.; Friel, S.; Bartlet, P. N.; Blair, N. Analyst 1993, 118, 371. (5) Lundberg, B.; Sundqvist, B. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 60, 1074.

2856 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 70, No. 14, July 15, 1998

In this paper, we describe a fundamentally new type of chemiresistor that operates by a different mechanism. The transducer thin film incorporates an ensemble of nanometer-size metal particles each coated by an organic monomolecular layer. The combination of a large, three-dimensional group of these colloidal size, conducting metal cores separated by thin insulating layer shells has led us to refer to this device as a colloidal “metalinsulator-metal ensemble” (MIME) device. Our purpose in this study is to demonstrate the speed, reversibility, sensitivity, and selectivity of the MIME device in detecting organic chemical species. As a model system for the MIME component we use an alkanethiol stabilized gold nanocluster material. These new materials are attracting substantial interest because of their intriguing properties.9 This system has a chemistry that permits controlled and facile variations to be made in the size of the gold core and thickness of the ligand shell. These clusters are very stable in the solid state and easily redisperse in nonpolar organic solvents at concentrations up to 10 wt %. The synthetic method for preparation of these clusters is elegantly simple, involving reduction of gold chloride in the presence of alkanethiol surface complexing agents.10 Variation of the gold to alkanethiol stoichiometry has a pronounced effect on the core size which in turn has a dramatic effect on the electrical conductivity and its temperature dependence.11 The thickness of the ligand shell as determined by the number of carbon atoms in the alkanethiol chain also has a strong influence on the level of conductivity.12 As an abbreviated nomenclature for these normal alkanethiol stabilized gold clusters we use the following general form: (6) Ruschau, G. R.; Newnham, R. E.; Runt, J.; Smith, B. E. Sens. Actuators 1989, 20, 269. (7) Talik, P.; Zabdowska-Waclawek, M.; Waclawek, W. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 6807. (8) Lwnergan, M. C.; Serverin, E. J.; Doleman, B. J.; Beaber, S. A.; Grubbs, R. H.; Lewis, N. S. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2298. (9) (a) Hostetler, M. J.; Wingate, J. E.; Zhong, C. J.; Harris, J. E.; Vachet, R. W.; Clark, M. R.; Londono, J. D.; Green, S. J.; Stokes, J. J.; Wignall, G. D.; Glish, G. L.; Porter, M. D.; Evans, N. D.; Murray, R. W. Langmuir 1998, 14, 17. (b) Bethell, D.; Brust, M.; Schiffrin, D. J.; Kiely, C. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1996, 409, 137. (c) Whetton, R. L.; Khoury, J. T.; Alvarez, M. M.; Murthy, S.; Vezmar, I.; Wang, Z. L.; Stephens, P. W.; Cleveland, C. L.; Luedtke, W. D.; Landman, U. Adv. Mater. 1996, 8, 428. (10) Brust, M.; Walker, M.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin, D. J.; Whyman, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 801. (11) Snow, A. W.; Wohltjen, H. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 947. S0003-2700(97)01346-2 CCC: $15.00

© 1998 American Chemical Society Published on Web 05/30/1998

Au:Cn(X:Y), where the subscript n denotes the number of carbon atoms in the alkane chain and (X:Y) denotes the gold:alkanethiol stoichiometric ratio used in the synthesis. The individual clusters Au:C8(1:1), Au:C12(1:1), and Au:C16(1:1) have received a very thorough physical characterization.13 Here we describe the fabrication and response characteristics of the Au:Cn(X:Y) MIME device to a series of four vapors (toluene, tetrachloroethylene, 1-propanol, water) using the Au:C8(1:1) cluster as a representative transducer film. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Synthesis. Au:C8(1:1). The procedure is closely related to that of refs 10 and 12. Triple-distilled water and HPLC grade toluene were used as solvents. The following solutions were prepared in acid-cleaned glassware: (C8H17)4NBr (4.56 g, 83.4 mmol)/toluene (167 mL); HAuCl4‚3H2O (0.8025 g, 2.04 mmol)/ water (62.5 mL); 1-octanethiol (0.297 g, 2.03 mmol)/toluene (2 mL); NaBH4 (0.787 g, 20.8 mmol)/water (52.5 mL). The HAuCl4/ water was added to the (C8H17)4NBr/toluene solution with vigorous stirring. After 2 min with continued vigorous stirring, the octanethiol/toluene solution was added followed by the NaBH4/water solution, during which rapid color development occurred. Vigorous stirring was continued for 3 h. The toluene phase was then separated and concentrated (55 °C/60 mm) to an approximate 10-mL volume. The product was precipitated by dropwise addition into 800 mL of rapidly stirred ethanol. After settling overnight at 10 °C, the clear supernate was decanted and the settled product was collected by centrifugation followed by washing with fresh ethanol and drying. This crude product was redissolved in 3-4 mL of toluene and reprecipitated by dropwise addition into 200 mL of rapidly stirred ethanol. After standing for 12 h at 10 °C, the 200-mL suspension is centrifuged (6000 rpm), and the collected product was washed with fresh ethanol and vacuum-dried. Yield 0.39 g (79%). TGA analysis: N2 atm 600 °C mass loss 19.35% (lit.12 19.74%). Sensor and Circuit Configuration. The sensor was fabricated by deposition of a thin film of the Au:C8(1:1) cluster onto an interdigital microelectrode. This microelectrode (Microsensor Systems, Inc. P/N 302) was a gold electrode array fabricated on a 7 × 12.5 × 1 mm quartz substrate and consisted of 50 finger pairs with the following dimensions: spacing, 15 µm; finger width, 15 µm; overlap length, 4800 µm; electrode thickness, 1500 Å. This device was mounted on a brass plate heated to 120 °C and coated with a 0.2-0.4-µm-thick Au:C8(1:1) cluster film. Film deposition was accomplished using an airbrush technique where a 10 mg/ mL chloroform solution was sprayed using a fine nozzle setting for 16 passes of 1-s duration. The film thickness estimate was made by calculation from gravimetric measurement of the film mass (assuming a density of 3 g/cm3) and is accurate to only one significant figure. Conductivity changes in the microelectrode were measured using an ac technique. A square wave potential of 5 V and a frequency of 100 Hz was used to excite the microelectrode. The (12) Terrill, R. H.; Postlethwaite, A.; Chen, C.-H.; Poon, C.-D.; Terzis, A.; Chen, A.; Hutchison, J. E.; Clark, M. R.; Wignall, G.; Londono, J. D.; Superfine, R.; Falvo, M.; Johnson, C. S., Jr.; Samulski, E. T.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12537. (13) Ingram, R. S.; Hostetler, M. J.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9175.

Figure 1. Response of an Au:C8(1:1) MIME sensor to five 60-s toluene vapor exposure/purge cycles at concentrations of 11 000 (above) and 2.7 ppmv (below) in air. The device signal is in the form of a frequency that is proportional to the sensor conductance. The plot illustrates the modulation in sensor conductance that results from alternating exposures to dry air and dry air with toluene vapor. The baseline resistance (0 device signal counts) of this sensor is 1.5 MΩ, and the intensities of the 11 000 and 2.7 ppmv signals correspond to respective resistance increases of 3.4 MΩ and 420 Ω.

resulting current in the microelectrode was processed using a current-to-voltage converter circuit followed by a precision rectifier and low-pass filter. Thus, the magnitude of the 100-Hz ac microelectrode current was converted into a proportional dc voltage. For convenience, this voltage was converted to a frequency (using a V/F converter) to allow data acquisition over a wide dynamic range using a computerized frequency counter. This measurement scheme allowed the microelectrode current to be measured, displayed, and stored with a time resolution of 1 s and a relative current resolution of 0.001%. Vapor Response. The sensor was mounted in a custom-made gold-plated aluminum cell designed for low dead volume (i.e.,