Composition and Toxicity of Biogas Produced from Different

Subscriber access provided by Nottingham Trent University

Energy and the Environment

Composition and Toxicity of Biogas Produced from Different Feedstocks in California Yin Li, Christopher Alaimo, Minji Kim, Norman Y. Kado, Joshua Peppers, Jian Xue, Chao Wan, Peter G. Green, Ruihong Zhang, Bryan M. Jenkins, Christoph Franz Adam Vogel, Stefan Wuertz, Thomas M. Young, and Michael J. Kleeman Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03003 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Sep 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on September 4, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Composition and Toxicity of Biogas Produced from Different Feedstocks

2

in California

3 4

Yin Lia, Christopher P. Alaimoa, Minji Kima, Norman Y. Kadoc, Joshua Peppersb, Jian Xuea, Chao

5

Wana, Peter G. Greena, Ruihong Zhangb, Bryan M. Jenkinsb, Christoph F.A. Vogelc, Stefan Wuertzd,

6

Thomas M. Younga, and Michael J. Kleemana,*

7 8 9

a

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California – Davis, Davis,

10

California 95616, USA

11

b

12

California 95616, USA

13

c Department

14

California – Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA

15

d

16

Singapore 637551

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California – Davis, Davis,

of Environmental Toxicology and Center for Health and Environment, University of

Singapore Center for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technical University,

17 18 19

*corresponding author: [email protected]

20

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

21

University of California

22

Davis, CA 95616

23

Phone: 530 752 8386

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


25

Abstract

26

Biogas is a renewable energy source composed of methane, carbon dioxide, and other trace

27

compounds produced from anaerobic digestion of organic matter. A variety of feedstocks can be

28

combined with different digestion techniques that each yield biogas with different trace

29

composition. California is expanding biogas production systems to help meet greenhouse gas

30

reduction goals. Here we report the composition of six California biogas streams from three

31

different feedstocks (dairy manure, food waste and municipal solid waste). The chemical and

32

biological composition of raw biogas is reported and the toxicity of combusted biogas is tested

33

under fresh and photo-chemically aged conditions. Results show that municipal waste biogas

34

contained elevated levels of chemicals associated with volatile consumer products (VCPs) such as

35

aromatic hydrocarbons, siloxanes, and certain halogenated hydrocarbons. Food waste biogas

36

contained elevated levels of sulfur-containing compounds including hydrogen sulfide, mercaptans,

37

and sulfur dioxide. Biogas produced from dairy manure generally had lower concentrations of

38

trace chemicals, but the combustion products had slightly higher toxicity response compared to

39

the other feedstocks. Atmospheric aging performed in a photochemical smog chamber did not

40

strongly change the toxicity (oxidative capacity or mutagenicity) of biogas combustion exhaust.

41 42

Key words: Biogas, California, chemical composition, bacteria, toxicity


Page 2 of 32

Page 3 of 32


44

45 46

Abstract Art



48

1. Introduction

49

Biogas is a renewable fuel produced from the anaerobic digestion of organic feed stocks

50

including municipal waste, farm waste, food waste and energy crops. Raw biogas typically consists

51

of methane (50-75%), carbon dioxide (25-50%) and smaller amounts of nitrogen (2-8%). Trace

52

levels of hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, hydrogen and various volatile organic compounds are also

53

present in biogas depending on the feedstock1. Life cycle assessment studies have shown that

54

deploying biogas technologies can effectively reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and

55

therefore reduce the climate impact of energy consumption2–4. Biogas production and utilization

56

practices also help diversify energy systems while simultaneously promoting sustainable waste

57

management practices 1,5. California is promoting biogas utilization by mandating the low carbon

58

fuels, offering grants to develop biogas production facilities, and providing assistance in accessing

59

pipeline infrastructure6–8.

60

There are many environmental factors to consider when developing biogas energy sources

61

including the potential for air quality impacts. California is home to eight of the ten most polluted

62

cities in the United States9 and so the widespread utilization of any new fuel must be carefully

63

analyzed for effects on air quality and human health. The concentrations of minor chemical and

64

biological components in biogas differ from those found in other fuels. Some of these components

65

have the potential to be toxic to human health and the environment, to form toxic substances during

66

the combustion process, or to form toxic substances after photochemical aging in the atmosphere.

67

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Office of Environmental Health

68

Hazzard Assessment (OEHHA) compiled a list of twelve trace components potentially present in

69

biogas at levels significantly above traditional fossil natural gas including carcinogens (arsenic, p-

70

dichlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, n-nitroso-di-n-propylamine, vinyl chloride) and non-carcinogens


Page 4 of 32

Page 5 of 32


71

(antimony, copper, hydrogen sulfide, lead, methacrolein, mercaptans, toluene). A limited dataset

72

of measurements is available to characterize levels of these biogas components in California.

73

Measurements of landfill biogas composition have been made over many decades around the world

74

to identify sources of odor, to reduce ground level volatile organic compound (VOC)

75

contamination, and to optimally recover biogas as an energy source10. Trace components identified

76

in landfill biogas include halocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons and siloxanes11–16. Animal waste

77

has significant biogas potential in California but often contains sulfur compounds that must be

78

removed prior to use17,18. Food waste is a relatively new feedstock that has only been analyzed for

79

biogas plant performance19,20. Previous studies have tested biogas or simulated biogas burning in

80

engines or turbines, focusing on engine/turbine performance, NOx and small hydrocarbon

81

emissions21–26, but these studies did not examine trace chemical compounds in the engine

82

combustion exhaust that could pose environmental and human health concerns.

83

Here we report the composition and toxicity of biogas produced and directly used for

84

electricity production at five different facilities in California. Samples at each site were collected

85

over three separate days spanning a range of environmental conditions. Comprehensive

86

measurements were performed for 273 different features including major biogas chemical

87

components, a variety of different organic and inorganic trace components, trace elements, and

88

microorganisms. Concentrations were compared to previously reported measurements and to the

89

regulatory limits specified by OEHHA and the California Division of Occupational Safety and

90

Health (Cal/OSHA). A standard biomarker assay was used to evaluate the oxidative capacity of

91

biogas combustion exhaust and the associated short-term inflammatory response. A carcinogen

92

screening mutagenicity bioassay was used to evaluate the probability that biogas combustion

93

exhaust will damage DNA, leading to increased cancer risk over longer time periods. These



94

comprehensive measurements help to understand the potential air quality impacts of widespread

95

biogas production and combustion for electricity generation across California.

96 97

2．Materials and Methods

98

2.1 Biogas sources

99

A total of eighteen sets of samples were collected from five biogas facilities: 1) dairy waste

100

biogas produced by a flushed manure collection and covered lagoon system, 2) dairy waste biogas

101

produced by a scraped manure collection and digester system, 3) food waste biogas, 4) food waste

102

biogas mixed with nearby landfill gas, 5a) biogas produced by the core portion of a regional landfill,

103

and 5b) biogas produced from perimeter of the same regional landfill. The biogas production and

104

utilization technologies used at each site are summarized in Table 1. A map showing the locations

105

of all biogas facilities studied is present in Figure S1. All of the facilities generate electricity on-

106

site using engines or turbines tuned to operate on biogas.

107

2.2 Chemical analysis

108

Biogas is a complex matrix containing hundreds of trace chemical compounds that cover a

109

broad range of functional groups with different volatility.

110

techniques are employed to measure the full range of compound classes. Common sampling

111

methods include collecting high volatility compounds in Tedlar (polyvinyl fluoride) bags or in

112

metal canisters, enriching lower volatility compounds onto solid sorbent tubes, and stripping polar

113

compounds using liquid sorbents in glass impingers. The widely used analysis procedures include

114

compound separation using gas or liquid chromatography optionally coupled with a desorption

115

unit followed by detectors that may be compound-specific or general mass spectrometers.

116

Detection limits are typically tens to hundreds of parts per billion by volume for different


Multiple sampling and analysis

Page 6 of 32

Page 7 of 32

117


compounds10,11,13–15,27–29.

118

The current study employed sampling and analysis techniques following the practices

119

summarized above as published by the EPA (TO-1529, 8081b30, 8270d31, 8082a32, 2933) and ASTM

120

(D194534, D622835) standard laboratory methods. Tedlar® sample bags were collected under

121

positive system pressure or using a “Vac-U-Chamber” (SKC-West, Inc.) vacuum sampling

122

apparatus if biogas pressure was negative. Each Tedlar bag sample analysis included a pure

123

nitrogen system blank and calibration standards. Tedlar sample bags were directly connected to

124

the instruments summarized in Table S1 and analyzed for the 119 compounds listed in Table S2.

125

Semi-volatile and/or reactive chemical compounds were collected on three different types of

126

sorbent tubes: XAD-2 sorbent tubes, coconut charcoal sorbent tubes and DNPH-treated silica gel

127

tubes. Flow through each sorbent tube was controlled at 1.0 L٠min-1 using a calibrated variable

128

area flow meter with built-in stainless steel valve followed by a downstream Teflon diaphragm

129

pump (R202-FP-RA1, Air Dimensions Inc.). All sorbent tubes were sealed until just prior to

130

sampling, and immediately capped at the conclusion of sampling. Each sample analysis run

131

included a system blank, two sample blanks, and calibration standards. A multi-point calibration

132

curve generated from the calibration standard was used to quantify the target compounds. Table

133

S3 lists collection times, extraction methods and analysis methods for each sorbent tube. A

134

comprehensive list of target chemical compounds in each sampling/analysis pathway is presented

135

in Tables S4-S6 (102+33+13=148 compounds total). Biogas samples for metals analysis were

136

collected using three serial glass impingers that each contained 20 mL of 5% nitric acid and 10%

137

hydrogen peroxide in double deionized (18.2 MOhm*cm) water. Liquid solutions from each of

138

the impingers were transferred into separate capped vials and then analyzed with inductively

139

coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Agilent 7500i ICP-MS, operated with a Glass Expansion



140

AR50 MicroMist nebulizer).

141

2.3 Biological analysis

142

Samples for biological analysis were collected on two 47 mm polycarbonate filters (0.4

143

µm pore-size) to support analysis for cultivable microorganisms and corrosion inducing bacteria

144

DNA. Sample flow rates ranged from 1-5 L٠ min-1 over times ranging from 2-4 hours. Condensate

145

transported along with biogas was also collected. Individual filters were placed in 50 ml Falcon

146

tubes containing 15 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Filters were eluted in PBS by vortexing

147

the Falcon tube for 5s followed by manual shaking for 2 min in a biosafety cabinet. Cultivable

148

aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in eluates and condensates were enumerated by propagation in

149

different growth media using the most probable number (MPN) tests36,37. Positive samples in the

150

MPN tests were further characterized using DNA sequencing by conducting polymerase chain

151

reaction (PCR) targeting 16S rRNA38. This allowed simultaneous identification of different

152

bacteria species in each sample. Nucleic acids in eluates and condensates were extracted using the

153

FAST DNA® SPIN KIT for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA) following the manufacturer’s

154

protocol. Five qPCR assays targeting total bacteria and corrosion inducing bacteria including

155

sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB), iron oxidizing bacteria (IOB) and acid producing bacteria (APB)

156

were selected from the literature39–43.

157

2.4 Toxicity analysis

158

Samples of biogas combustion exhaust were collected from five different electricity

159

generators summarized in Table 1 after dilution with pre-cleaned background air. A 5.5 m3 Teflon

160

photochemical reaction chamber (0.051 mm NORTON FEP fluoropolymer film) installed in a 24-

161

foot mobile trailer was used to simulate atmospheric aging of diluted exhaust under both light

162

(daytime UV=50 W m-2) and dark (nighttime) conditions at each test facility. The reaction chamber


Page 8 of 32

Page 9 of 32


163

was flushed three times before each test with air that was pre-cleaned using granulated activated

164

carbon to remove background gases followed by a High Efficiency Particulate Arrestance (HEPA)

165

filter to remove background particles. Dark aging tests started by filling the reaction chamber to

166

50% capacity with clean air, followed by injecting combustion exhaust through a 1/2-inch diameter

167

insulated stainless steel transfer line at a flow rate of 26 L٠min-1 (50~55oC) for 255 seconds. The

168

reaction chamber was then filled to 100% capacity with clean air within 90 seconds, yielding a

169

well-mixed system at a dilution ratio of approximately 50:1. The diluted exhaust was aged in the

170

chamber for 3 hours before collection onto 47 mm Teflon filters (Zefluor, 2 µm pore size) at 20

171

L٠min-1 for 3.5 hours. Light aging tests followed the same experimental protocol with the

172

exception that 100 liters of VOC surrogate gas (1.125±0.022 ppmv m-xylene and 3.29±0.07 ppmv

173

n-hexane in air, Scott Marrin, Inc.) was injected into the chamber immediately after the combustion

174

exhaust, creating a final VOC concentration of 90 ppbv. Hydroxyl radical concentrations during

175

the light aging tests were calculated to be 5-6 x 106 molecules cm-3 based on the decay rate of the

176

m-xylene and final ozone concentrations at the end of the 3 hour experiment were measured to be

177

110~125 ppb.

178

The expression of in-vitro pro-inflammatory markers was measured in human U937

179

macrophage cells (American Tissue Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). Macrophages are the first

180

line of defense in human lungs, and substances in engine exhaust sample may interact with the

181

macrophage cells though the Toll-Like Receptors (TLR), Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) and

182

the NF-KappaB protein complex to induce inflammatory responses. Biomarkers checked in this

183

study include Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP1A1: marker for polycyclic aromatic

184

hydrocarbons), Interleukin 8 (IL-8: marker for inflammation), and Cyclooxygenase (COX-2: a key

185

enzyme for production of prostaglandins mediating pain and inflammation). After a 6-hr treatment



186

of exhaust filter extract, mRNA was isolated from U937 macrophage cells and reverse-transcribed

187

into cDNA for quantitative expression analysis using qPCR. Results were normalized to

188

housekeeping gene β–Actin expression and expressed as fold increase of mRNA in treated cells

189

relative to untreated cells 44. The mutagenicity bioassay was carried out via a micro-suspension

190

modification of the Salmonella/microsome Ames assay45,46 that is ten times more sensitive than

191

the standard plate incorporation test. Frame-shift mutations of Salmonella typhimurium tester

192

strain TA98 were observed. TA98 requires exogenous histidine (His-) for growth, however

193

substances in exhaust samples could cause deletion or addition of nucleotides in the DNA sequence

194

of TA98 histidinegene (frame-shift), resulting in TA98’s ability to manufacture histidine (His+)

195

The resultant colonies are referred to as “Revertants”as the DNA sequence is changed back to its

196

original correct form. Liver homogenate (S9) from male Aroclor-induced Sprague Dawley rats

197

(Mol Tox, Boone, NC) was added to the assay to provide metabolic activation of the sample.

198 199

3. Results and discussion

200

3.1 Biogas composition

201

Concentrations of major biogas components (methane, carbon dioxide, nitrogen and

202

oxygen) are shown in Figure 1. Methane (CH4) content of the different biogas streams varied from

203

49.5% to 70.5% with the exception of perimeter landfill biogas (biogas 6) which contained only

204

35.4% methane due to high levels of air intrusion into the gas extraction system. Biogas produced

205

from flushed dairy waste using a covered lagoon (biogas 1) had the highest measured methane

206

concentration. In contrast, biogas produced from scraped dairy waste in an anaerobic digester

207

(biogas 2) had a much lower methane concentration of 51.3%. Similar trends were reported by

208

Saber et al. who measured the average methane concentration in a covered lagoon dairy biogas


Page 10 of 32

Page 11 of 32


209

facility in the western US to be 67.6%, while the methane concentration in a complete mixed dairy

210

biogas digester in the western US was only 60.5% 47. In addition, the biogas 2 facility adds iron

211

chloride to digester slurry. Iron chloride is known to inhibit anaerobic digestion processes,

212

resulting in lower biogas methane content48. Core landfill biogas had an average methane

213

concentration of 49.5%, which fell into the range reported by previous studies conducted in US

214

and Europe 11,12,14. The carbon dioxide content in the biogas ranged from 20.2% in lagoon dairy

215

biogas (biogas 1) to 46.9% in food waste/landfill biogas (biogas 4). Concentrations of CH4 and

216

CO2 observed in this study fall in the range commonly reported for biogas. Another important

217

GHG formed during the life cycle of organic waste management is nitrous oxide (N2O). N2O is

218

known to account for more than 20% of the total global warming potential (100-yr scale)

219

associated with GHGs emissions from organic waste storage practices49,50, but N2O is unlikely to

220

form in the anaerobic digestion process that produces biogas51.

221

Small amounts of nitrogen (N2, < 8%) and oxygen (O2,

Composition and Toxicity of Biogas Produced from Different

Recommend Documents