Conditions Leading to Mycotoxin Contamination of Foods and Feeds

0 2. —. —. +. Nature of substrate. +. —. +. Mineral nutrition. +. —. +. Chemical treatment. —. —. +. Biological ... ucts are remoistened b...
1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
1 Conditions Leading to Mycotoxin Contamination of Foods and Feeds CLIFFORD W. HESSELTINE

Downloaded by AKDENIZ UNIV on December 20, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1976 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1976-0149.ch001

Northern Regional Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Peoria, Ill. 61604 Toxigenic mold invasion is affected during plant growth, at harvest, and after harvest. Invasion by fungi is affected by the amount of spore inoculum in the field, stresses on the plant, invertebrate infections, damage by other fungi, plant resistance, mechanical damage, mineral nutrition of the plant, and temperature. During harvest, grain is exposed to mechanical damage and mold inoculum. After harvest, mold growth depends on moisture level of the grain, temperature and humidity, rapidity of drying, aeration, the microbiological ecosystem, insects, mixing of grain, chaff and dirt, chemical treatment, internal infection, accidental rewetting of the grain by condensation or leakage, and the development of hot spots.

The key to preventing toxigenic fungi from developing in foods and feeds is to understand how they enter and develop in plant material. The alternative to preventing them from developing is to destroy or to remove the mycotoxin from the food or feed. However this approach is fraught with a number of problems: (a) any chemical or physical treat­ ment that removes mycotoxins adds to the cost of a product already damaged from mold growth; besides the initial processing cost, additional material may be lost from separating the mycotoxin-infected parts me­ chanically or chemically (solvent extraction). For example, scabby wheat is cleaned by removing the chaffy kernels, (b) Most processes that remove mycotoxins are not 100% efficient, (c) When chemical processes are used, extensive testing is required to establish that a second biologi­ cally active compound with a different mode of action has not been formed, (d) Processes that remove mycotoxins may reduce the food value of the final product. 1

In Mycotoxins and Other Fungal Related Food Problems; Rodricks, J.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1976.

2

MYCOTOXINS

I p r e f e r t h e first, a n d p e r h a p s less p o p u l a r , a p p r o a c h of p r e v e n t i n g m o l d f r o m d e v e l o p i n g i n crops.

H o w e v e r , this a p p r o a c h r e q u i r e s a t h o r ­

o u g h u n d e r s t a n d i n g of the c o n d i t i o n s u n d e r w h i c h e a c h of the m y c o t o x i n m o l d s grows—i.e., i n f o r m a t i o n f r o m one species of f u n g i c a n n o t b e t r a n s ­ f e r r e d to a n o t h e r species. Pénicillium

duponti

has a n o p t i m u m g r o w t h at

45 ° C a n d does n o t g r o w at r o o m t e m p e r a t u r e , t h e o p t i m u m t e m p e r a t u r e for P . citrinum.

growth

O u r basic information about fungal growth

is s u r p r i s i n g l y m e a g e r a n d i n c o m p l e t e .

F o r example, early i n our w o r k

o n aflatoxin i n cereals, w e s e a r c h e d the l i t e r a t u r e f o r the k i n d of sugars t h a t Aspergillus

flavus

u t i l i z e d : w e f o u n d o n l y a short a n d i n c o m p l e t e

Downloaded by AKDENIZ UNIV on December 20, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1976 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1976-0149.ch001

statement o n t h e subject

(I).

I n this b r i e f r e v i e w of c o n d i t i o n s l e a d i n g t o m y c o t o x i n f o r m a t i o n i n foods a n d feeds, I u s u a l l y use o n l y one reference conserve

space; h o w e v e r ,

for each factor

I e n u m e r a t e a l l factors affecting

to

mycotoxin

f o r m a t i o n w i t h o u t d e s c r i b i n g the o p t i m u m c o n d i t i o n s f o r m a x i m u m p r o ­ d u c t i o n of m y c o t o x i n s b y a n y p a r t i c u l a r m o l d species; I f o l l o w the o u t l i n e of J a r v i s ( 2 )

w h o d i v i d e d the e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s i n t o c h e m i c a l ,

physical, and biological. T a b l e I.

F u n g i W h i c h Produce Mycotoxins Classified by H a b i t a t

F u n g i G r o w i n g i n the L i v i n g P l a n t Claviceps purpurea Aspergillus flams Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Rhizoctonia leguminicola Fusarium graminearum Helminthosporium (Gibberella zeae) biseptatum Fungi Growing in Decaying Plant Material Fusarium graminearum Pithomyces chartarum Stachybotrys atra Chaetomium globosum Periconia minutissima Dendrodochium toxicum Fusarium sporotrichoides Myrothecium verrucaria Gladosporium sp. Trichothecium roseum Alternaria longipes Trichoderma viride F u n g i Growing on Stored P l a n t M a t e r i a l Pénicillium islandicum Aspergillus flavus P. citrinum A. parasiticus P. rubrum A. versicolor P. citreoviride A. ochraceus P. cyclopium A. clavatus P. viridicatum A. fumigatus P. urticae A. rubrum P. verruculosum A. chevalieri P. puberulum P. expansum P. rugulosum P. palitans P. roqueforti

Chaetomium globosum Fusarium graminearum F. tricinctum F. nivale F. moniliforme

In Mycotoxins and Other Fungal Related Food Problems; Rodricks, J.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1976.

1.

HESSELTiNE

Conditions

Leading

to

3

Contamination

A n o t h e r a p p r o a c h is to s t u d y t h e different c o n d i t i o n s w h i c h i n f l u e n c e m o l d g r o w t h i n t h e field a n d d u r i n g t h e h a r v e s t a n d storage. a m p l e , factors affecting m o l d i n v a s i o n of t h e d e v e l o p i n g

F o r ex­

corn kernel

i n c l u d e the a m o u n t of spore i n o c u l a , stress factors o n the g r o w i n g p l a n t , insect a n d m i t e p o p u l a t i o n s , d a m a g e f r o m other f u n g i , v a r i e t a l s u s c e p t i ­ b i l i t y o r resistance, m e c h a n i c a l d a m a g e f r o m f a r m i n g , s t o r m

damage,

b i r d d a m a g e , m i n e r a l n u t r i t i o n of t h e p l a n t , a n d t e m p e r a t u r e .

During

harvest, the g r a i n is e x p o s e d to m e c h a n i c a l i n j u r y a n d extensive s p o r e i n o c u l a t i o n . A f t e r harvest, m o l d g r o w t h a n d m y c o t o x i n p r o d u c t i o n c a n b e affected b y the m o i s t u r e l e v e l , t e m p e r a t u r e , a e r a t i o n , m i c r o b i o l o g i c a l Downloaded by AKDENIZ UNIV on December 20, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1976 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1976-0149.ch001

ecosystem, storage insects, b l e n d i n g of c o r n , a m o u n t of chaff a n d d i r t , c h e m i c a l treatment, a m o u n t of i n t e r n a l i n f e c t i o n , r e w e t t i n g f r o m c o n d e n ­ s a t i o n a n d l e a k a g e , a m o u n t of

damage,

chemical composition

of

the

substrate, a n d h e a t i n g . M y c o t o x i n p r o d u c t i o n is also a v a r i a b l e f a c t o r . Numerous fungi produce mycotoxins

i n the l i v i n g p l a n t , o n

plant material, a n d i n stored m a t e r i a l ( T a b l e I ) .

decaying

T a b l e I I contains t h e

p h y s i c a l , c h e m i c a l , a n d b i o l o g i c a l factors that influence m o l d g r o w t h a n d mycotoxin formation. Table II.

Factors Affecting M y c o t o x i n Formation

Physical Moisture r a p i d i t y of d r y i n g rewetting relative h u m i d i t y Temperature M e c h a n i c a l damage B l e n d i n g of g r a i n H o t spots Time Chemical C0 0 N a t u r e of substrate Mineral nutrition Chemical treatment 2

2

Biological P l a n t stress Invertebrate vectors F u n g u s infection P l a n t v a r i e t a l differences F u n g a l s t r a i n differences Spore l o a d M i c r o b i o l o g i c a l ecosystem

In Field

At Harvest

+ —

+ + + + + + + — +

+ + + + + + + + +

— — — —

+ + + + +



+ + + — —

+ — —

+ + — + + + + + + +

In



— — — — —

+ —

In Mycotoxins and Other Fungal Related Food Problems; Rodricks, J.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1976.

Storage

+ + + + + + +

4

MYCOTOXINS

Physical

Factors

M o i s t u r e . I f o t h e r factors are e q u a l , t h e s a p r o p h y t i c f u n g i t h a t g r o w i n the field r e q u i r e a h i g h e r m o i s t u r e l e v e l t h a n those f o u n d i n storage. Jarvis (2)

states t h a t d e c a y f u n g i r e q u i r e a h i g h e r m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t i n

t h e substrate ( 2 2 - 2 5 %

w e t w e i g h t ) t h a n storage f u n g i , w h i c h c a n g r o w

o n s t o r e d substrates ( 1 3 - 1 8 % ) . T w o aspects of t h e effect of m o i s t u r e o n f u n g i m u s t b e c o n s i d e r e d : the m o i s t u r e r e q u i r e d f o r spore g e r m i n a t i o n , a n d moisture r e q u i r e d for growth.

T h e r e is s o m e suggestion t h a t a n

o p t i m a l m o i s t u r e l e v e l exists f o r aflatoxin f o r m a t i o n i n s o l i d substrates.

Downloaded by AKDENIZ UNIV on December 20, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1976 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1976-0149.ch001

S u s s m a n ( 3 ) cites a n u m b e r of references to f u n g i , s u c h as Fusarium

and

w h o s e spores w i l l n o t g e r m i n a t e w i t h o u t a n exogenous

Myrothecium,

source o f e n e r g y e v e n t h o u g h m o i s t u r e levels are a d e q u a t e a n d spores c o n t a i n a n e n e r g y source. O n t h e other h a n d , spores of some f u n g i , s u c h as the r u s t f u n g i a n d Helminthosporium, A y e r s t (4)

germinate i n distilled water.

s t u d i e d the effect of m o i s t u r e o n the g r o w t h of a n u m b e r of

f u n g i . H i s d a t a o n t h e m y c o t o x i n - p r o d u c i n g f u n g i are s h o w n i n T a b l e I I I . Table III. Approximate Temperature and Moisture Limits and O p t i m a f o r G r o w t h of S e v e r a l M y c o t o x i n - P r o d u c i n g F u n g i " Limits

Optima

aw

°C

aw*

Species

10-42 0.71 Aspergillus chevalieri 0.93 33 0.78 12-43 0.98 Aspergillus flavus 33 0.82 12-53 0.97 40 Aspergillus fumigatus 0.82