Conformational Study of 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18

Jan 6, 1994 - J. David Hobbs,*. John A. Shelnutt,'v# and Kevin M. Smithst. Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, California 956 16...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Inorg. Chem.1994, 33, 3865-3812

3865

Articles Conformational Study of 2,3,5,7,8,12,13,15,17,18-Decaalkylporphyrins Craig J. Medforth,*JMathias 0. Senge,? Timothy P. Forsyth,? J. David Hobbs,* John A. Shelnutt,'v# and Kevin M. Smithst Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, California 95616, and Fuel Science Department 621 1, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 871 85

Received January 6,1994" X-ray crystal structures are reported for two sterically crowded porphyrins: 3,5,7,13,15,17-hexaethyl-2,8,12,18tetramethylporphyrin (6, H2DAP) and (3,5,7,13,15,17-hexaethyl-2,8,12,18-tetramethylporphinato)nickel(II) (Ni6, NiDAP). In the NiDAP structure, steric crowding is relieved by the usual mechanism of the porphyrin adopting a nonplanar conformation. The crystal structure of HzDAP is unusual, as it shows an essentially planar conformation of the porphyrin macrocycle. In this case, steric crowding of the meso and pyrrole ethyl groups is relieved by a novel elongation of the macrocycle along the 5,15 axis. A detailed study is made of the solution conformations of HzDAP, NiDAP, and the corresponding zinc(I1) complex (ZnDAP), using optical spectroscopy, variable-temperature proton N M R spectroscopy, and molecular mechanics calculations. It is suggested that the two species observed in lowtemperature proton N M R studies of H2DAP and ZnDAP correspond to cis and trans conformations of the methyl groups of the meso ethyls, and not the syn and anti structures proposed previously (Maruyama; et al. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1988, I, 63). Crystal data: HlDAP (6), C36H46N4, M , = 534.8,monoclinic, P2l/c,a = 6.458(4) A, b = 16.58(2) A, c = 13.778(7) A, j3 = 99.78(4)', V = 1,454(2) A3, Z = 2,D, = 1.222Mgm-3, X(Mo Ka) = 0.71073 A, p = 0.072 mm-I, 130 K,R = 0.069 for 1769 reflections with F > 4.0u(F); NiDAP (Ni6), C36H&N4Nir Mr = 591.5,monoclinic, P2l/c,n = 14.350(8) A, b = 16.043(6) A, c = 15.049(6) A, j3 = 117.12(3)', V = 3,083(2) A3, Z = 4,D, = 1.274M P ~ - X(Mo ~ , Ka) = 0.710 73 A, p = 0.660"-1, 130 K,R = 0.072 for 3717 reflections with F > 4.0u(F).

Introduction Nonplanar conformations of porphyrins and related macrocycles have long been a source of considerable interest.'-3 Recently, efforts in this area have been directed toward the preparation of extremely nonplanar porphyrins as models for the nonplanar conformational distortions that are found in biological systems.M It is believed that these nonplanar distortions may be one mechanism for modulating the optical, redox, and other properties of tetrapyrro1es.e We recently prepared a series of dodecasubstituted porphyrins (e.g. 1) which adopt extremely nonplanar conformations both in the crystalline state and in solution?-l4 These porphyrins have provided detailed information about the effects of nonplanarity on the porphyrin macrocycle. + University of California.

Sandia National Laboratories.

* Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, July

15, 1994. (1) Hoard, J. L. In Porphyrins and Metalloporphyrins; Smith, K. M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1975; Chapter 8. (2) Scheidt, W. R. In The Porphyrins; Dolphin, D., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1979; Vol. 3, Chapter 10. (3) Scheidt, W. R.; Lee Y. J. Strucr. Bonding 1987, 64, 1. (4) Fajer, J.; Barkigia, K. M.; Smith, K. M.; Zhong, E.;Gudowska-Nowak, E.; Newton, M. In Reaction Centers ofPhotosyntheticBacreria;MichelBeyerle, M. E., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1990; p 367. (5) Fajer, J. Chem. Ind. (London) 1991, 869. (6) Senge, M. 0. J. Photochem. Photobiol.. B 1992, 16, 3. (7) Medforth,C. J.;Berber, M. D.;Smith,K. M.;Shelnutt, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3719. (8) Medforth, C. J.; Smith, K. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 5583. (9) Barkigia, K. M.; Berber, M. D.; Fajer, J.; Medforth, C. J.; Renner, M. W.; Smith, K. M. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1990, 112, 8851. (10) . , Shelnutt. J. A,: Medforth, C. J.: Berber, M. D.; Barkigia, K. M.; Smith, K. M. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1991, 1 1 3, 4077. (1 1) Medforth, C. J.; Senge, M. 0.;Smith, K. M.; Sparks, L. D.; Shelnutt, J. A. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1992, 114, 9859. (12) Sparks, L. D.; Medforth, C. J.; Park, M.-S.;Chamberlain, J. R.;Ondrias, M. R.; Senge, M. 0.;Smith, K. M.; Shelnutt, J. A. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1993, 115, 581.

The nonplanarity of dodecasubstituted porphyrins such as 1 iscaused by steric crowding of the peripheral substituents. During our studies'-14 a systematic investigation was made of the factors that affect the degree of nonplanarity and the type of nonplanar distortion. It was found that the degree of nonplanarity could be modulated by the use of alkano moieties fused to the pyrrole rings, with the degree of nonplanarity increasing dramatically in the series of porphyrins 2-4.7J0J3 Changing the meso substituents toalkyl chains (as in e.g. 5) was found toalter the typeof nonplanar distortion and produced a ruffled porphyrin m a c r o c y ~ l e . ~For lJ~ the saddle-shaped porphyrin 1, smaller metal ions such as nickel(11) were found to cause an increase in nonplanarity when compared to larger metals such as zinc(II).12 The structural effects of various substituents and metal ions were accurately reproduced using a molecular mechanics force field designed specifically for porphyrins.1°J2 The above investigations prompted us to look at porphyrins which have fewer substituents than the dodecasubstituted porphyrins but which might still adopt nonplanar conformations. Such porphyrins are likely to provide further novel structural findings, as well as to provide a stringent test of the molecular mechanics force field and the spectroscopic techniques used to probe porphyrin nonplanarity. One porphyrin of interest is 3,5,7,(13) Senge, M. 0.;Medforth, C. J.; Sparks, L.D.; Smith, K. M.; Shelnutt, J. A. Znorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 1716. (14) Barkigia,K. M.;Renner,M. W.;Furenlid,L.R.;Medforth,C. J.;Smith, K. M.; Fajer, J. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1993, 115. 3627. (15) The nomenclature used to describe nonplanar conformations is taken from ref 3. In a saddle conformation, alternate pyrrole rings are tilted up and down with respect to a least-squares plane through the 24 atoms of the porphyrin core and the meso carbon atoms are in the least-squares plane. In a ruffled conformation, alternate pyrrole rings are twisted clockwise or anticlockwise about the M-N bond such that the meso carbon atoms are alternately above or below the least-squares plane through the 24 atoms of the porphyrin core.

0020-166919411333-3865$04.50/0 0 1994 American Chemical Society

Medforth et al.

3866 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 33, No. 18, 1994

Table 1. Crystal Data and Data Collection and Refinement Parameters for HzDAP and NiDAP formula habit mol wt lattice space group a, A

b, A

A 6,deg C,

v,A3

h(Mo Ka),8,

T.K R' RWb

S

2

3 4

5 11

n = 1, R = QHz(3.4S-OMe) n=2,R=w5 n=3,R=GjH5 n = 1, R = CH~CHZCHZCH~CH~ n = 1, R = CHzCH3

Figure 1. Structures and nomenclature for some decasubstituted and dodecasubstituted porphyrins. The conformations of the decasubstituted free-base porphyrin 6 and its metal complexes are investigated in this study.

SYN \ .....-

ANTI Figure 2. Solution structures previously proposed for H2DAP and ZnDAP.16 Wedges indicate the substituents at the 5- and 15-positions. (6,HzDAP). 13,15,17-hexaethyl-2,8,12,18-tetramethylporphyrin Variable-temperature proton NMR studies of H z D A P and t h e corresponding zinc(I1) complex (ZnDAP) have previously been interpreted in terms of a mixture of nonplanar syn and anti conformations (Figure 2).16 The copper(I1) complex (CuDAP) has also been shown to adopt a syn structure in t h e crystalline state." In t h e present study, we report a comprehensive investigation of t h e conformations of HzDAP, ZnDAP, CuDAP, and thenickel(I1) complex (NiDAP),using X-ray crystallography, molecular mechanics calculations, optical spectroscopy, and variable-temperature proton NMR spectroscopy.

Experimental Section Synthesis. H2DAP was synthesized and purified using a literature procedure.16 To prepare NiDAP and ZnDAP, HzDAP was dissolved in methylene chloride and a large excess of a saturated solution of either (16) Maruyama, K.; Nagata, T.; Osuka, A. J . Phys. Org. Chem. 1988, I , 63. (1 7) Nagata, T.; Osuka, A.; Maruyama, K.; Toriumi, K. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, C46, 1745.

HzDAP (6)

NiDAP (Ni6)

C36Hd4 parallelepiped 534.8 monoclinic P2dC 6.458(4) 16.58(2) 13.778(7) 99.78(4) 1,454(2) 2 1.222 0.072 0.710 73 130 0.069 0.074 1.33

C36HuN4Ni hexagonal plate 591.5 monoclinic P21/c 14.350(8) 16.043(6) 15.049(6) 117.12(3) 3,083(2) 4 1.274 0.660 0.710 73 130 0.066 0.072 1.17

nickel(I1) acetateor zinc(I1) acetateinmethanol wasadded. The mixture was refluxed until thin layer chromatography indicated the absence of starting material. The reaction mixture was then washed twice with water, and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting residue was purified by column chromatography using silica gel and petroleum ether/methylene chloride (4:l v/v) aseluent. Theappropriate fractions wereconcentrated invacuo, and the resulting solid was recrystallized from methylene chloride/ cyclohexane. SpectroscopicMeasurements. Proton NMR spectra were recorded in CDzClz at a frequency of 300 MHz. All chemical shifts are given in ppm and have been converted to the S scale using the CHDCIz signal at 6 5.30. Thevariable-temperature unit was calibrated using a sampleof methanol.'* Electronic absorption spectra were recordedon a Hewlett Packard 8450A spectrophotometer using methylene chloride as solvent. X-ray Crystallography. Crystals were immersed in hydrocarbon oil, and a single crystal was selected, mounted on a glass fiber, and placed in a low-temperature Nz stream.I9 A Siemens R3m/V automatic diffractometer with a graphite-monochromator and a locally modified low-temperature device was used for data collection. Cell parameters were determined from 23 automatically centered reflections in the range 20' 6 28 6 30'. During the data collection, two standard reflections were measured every 198 reflections and showed only statistical variation (