Continuous and Inexpensive Monitoring of Nonpurgeable Organic

It is worthwhile to note that a magnetic stir bar was put in the first GLS to stir the mixture for .... Figure S8 illustrates steady-state signals obt...
0 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size
Subscriber access provided by HKU Libraries

Article

Continuous and Inexpensive Monitoring of Non-Purgeable Organic Carbon by Coupling High-Efficiency Photo-oxidation Vapor Generation to Miniaturized Point Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry Shu Zhang, Yunfei Tian, Hongling Yin, Yubin Su, Li Wu, Xiandeng Hou, and Chengbin Zheng Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01064 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Jul 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 14, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



Continuous and Inexpensive Monitoring of Non-Purgeable



Organic Carbon by Coupling High-Efficiency



Photo-oxidation Vapor Generation to Miniaturized Point



Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry



Shu Zhang1, Yunfei Tian3, Hongling Yin2, Yubin Su1, Li Wu3, Xiandeng Hou1,3, and



Chengbin Zheng1* 

7  8  9  10  11 

1

Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry & Technology of MOE, College of Chemistry,

Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China 2

College of Resources and Environment, Chengdu University of Information

Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610225, China 3

Analytical & Testing Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China

12 

*Corresponding author:

13 

Fax: +86 28 85412907; Phone: +86-28-85415810

14 

E–mail: [email protected] (C. B. Zheng)

1   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



ABSTRACT



Currently, no applicable analyzers are available to accomplish online and continuous



monitoring of organic pollution, which is one of the most important factors



contributing to water shortages around the world, particularly in developing countries.



In this work, a sensitive, miniaturized, inexpensive, on-line and continuous



non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC) analysis system was developed for the



continuous monitoring of such organic pollution. This system consists of a specially



designed and high efficiency UV photo-oxidation vapor generation (HE-POVG)



reactor and a miniaturized, low power (7 W) point discharge microplasma optical

10 

emission spectrometer (PD-OES). Organics present in sample or standard solutions

11 

are pumped to the HE-POVG and efficiently converted into CO2, which is separated

12 

and further transported to the PD-OES for NPOC analysis via the highly sensitive

13 

detection of carbon atomic emission at 193.0 nm. Under optimal conditions, a limit of

14 

detection (LOD) of 0.05 mg L-1 (as C) is obtained, with precision better than 5.0%

15 

(relative standard deviation, RSD) at 5 mg L-1. This system overcomes many

16 

shortcomings associated with conventional COD or TOC analyzers such as long

17 

analysis time, use of expensive and toxic chemicals, production of secondary toxic

18 

waste, requirement of large, power consuming and expensive instrumentation and

19 

difficulties implementing continuous, online and continuous monitoring. The system

20 

was successfully applied to the sensitive and accurate determination of NPOC in

21 

various water samples and for the continuous monitoring of such organic pollution in

22 

tap water.

23 

2   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 28

Page 3 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



INTRODUCTION



Water scarcity is one of the toughest challenges facing the world today and about 600



million people are at risk of disease or death because of insufficient clean water.1,2



Besides population growth and climate change, organic pollution produced from



human activities exacerbates this scarcity.3-5   



Chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total



organic carbon (TOC) are the most used methodologies for assessing organic



pollution 6-8. The conventional COD and BOD methods usually involve tedious and



time-consuming reflux (2-3 hours) and incubation (5 days) processes, respectively.

10 

Moreover, the COD methods require highly toxic (Cr6+ and Hg2+), expensive (Ag+) or

11 

corrosive (H2SO4) reagents. Recently, many methods based on electrocatalytic,9,10

12 

photocatalytic11-14 and photoelectrochemical15-18 oxidation principles have been

13 

developed for COD analysis. These methods simplified analytical procedures and

14 

minimized the consumption of toxic chemicals. It is noteworthy that both COD and

15 

BOD are indirect methods and may be severely interfered by some oxidizable ions.

16 

Compared to COD and BOD methods, TOC is the most suitable method for the

17 

evaluation of organic pollution of water because it not only significantly reduces the

18 

use of toxic chemicals but also directly express a measure of organic pollution.6

19 

Almost all TOC measurements include oxidation of organics to CO2 by chemical

20 

oxidation,19

21 

using noble metal catalysts (Pt or Pd), and detection of the generated CO2 with

22 

nondispersive infrared (NDIR) absorption spectrometry,22,25 thermal conductivity,26

23 

electrolytic conductivity,27 titrimetry28 or ion chromatography29. Despite such

24 

advantages of TOC, there still remain a number of shortcomings in both the oxidation

25 

and the detection steps. Chemical and photo-oxidation usually lead to incomplete

26 

oxidation of organics and underestimate the TOC value. Although HTC offers higher

27 

oxidation efficiency than other methods, this technique is still handicapped by the use

28 

of expensive catalysts and operation at high temperature. For CO2 detection,

29 

gravimetry and titrimetry are not sensitive and electrolytic conductivity is frequently

UV photo-oxidation20,21 or high-temperature combustion (HTC)22-24

3   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



precluded by the ionic compounds produced from the degradation of the organics



(particular for nitrogen and sulfur containing compounds). Notably, almost all of the



TOC techniques require relatively large and expensive laboratory instrumentation



which makes them unaffordable in developing countries,  whereas water crises caused



by organic pollution typically occurs in these countries because of their rapid



economic development. Moreover, there are currently no applicable analyzers for the



online and continuous monitoring of TOC. Therefore, there is an urgent need to



develop an inexpensive and continuous TOC monitoring system. Recently, we have



coupled microwave assisted oxidation vapor generation (MOVG) to dielectric barrier

10 

discharge (DBD) optical emission spectrometry (OES) for TOC analysis.30 MOVG

11 

can significantly improve the oxidation efficiency of organics and reduce the analysis

12 

time. However, conventional microwave oven heating is power consuming, expensive

13 

and automatically turned off when the oven is overheated, preventing its use for

14 

continuous monitoring. Meanwhile, careful operation and complex heating devices

15 

are also required to obtain satisfactory analytical performance because of the low

16 

excitation capacity of the DBD. Since purgeable organic carbon (POC) is also

17 

removed during the acidification and purging procedure used to eliminate the

18 

interference of total inorganic carbon (TIC)

19 

methods is non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC).

20 

In this work, an inexpensive and online system coupling a high-efficiency UV

21 

photo-oxidation vapor generation (HE-POVG) reactor to a miniaturized point

22 

discharge (PD) optical emission spectrometer was developed for the determination

23 

and continuous monitoring of NPOC. The high-efficiency POVG was realized using a

24 

special photo-oxidation reactor with high UV transmittance from a low-pressure

25 

mercury lamp wherein conversion of organics to CO2 was more efficient than

26 

conventional photo-oxidation reactors.31 Moreover, the PD possesses higher

27 

excitation capability than a DBD32 and thus offers higher sensitivity for the NPOC

28 

detection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of use of HE-POVG

29 

coupled to a PD-OES for NPOC analysis.

6,21

, the TOC determined by most of

4   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 28

Page 5 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



EXPERIMENTAL SECTION



Instrumentation. The HE-POVG-PD-OES system is presented in Figure 1 and



consists mainly of a flow injection (FI) or continuous flow HE-POVG reactor and a



point discharge optical emission spectrometer equipped with a commercial hand-held



charge coupled device (CCD) spectrometer (Maya 2000 Pro, Ocean Optics Inc.,



Dunedin, FL) with 200 - 400 nm of spectral range and 0.4 nm of spectral resolution.



The FI-HE-POVG reactor consisted of two channel peristaltic pumps (BT100-02,



Baoding Qili Precision Pump Company, Ltd., Baoding, China),  a six port injection



valve (Genuine Rheodyne Co., USA) equipped with a 0.5 mL of sampling loop, a

10 

high-efficiency photo-oxidation reactor (Beijing Titan Instruments Co., Beijing,

11 

China), a quartz gas liquid separator (GLS) and a quartz dryer filled with CaCl2. The

12 

photo-oxidation reactor was similar to the one reported in previous work,31 which

13 

included a quartz reaction tube (93 cm length × 1.0 mm i.d. × 2.0 mm o.d.) and a 19

14 

W low pressure mercury vapor UV lamp. The reaction tube was folded three times to

15 

increase the residence time of sample solution in UV irradiation zone within the body

16 

of the mercury lamp. The reactor was enclosed in aluminum foil to protect the

17 

operator from exposure to UV irradiation and reflect the UV back to the reaction

18 

solution, further improving the oxidation efficiency. It should be emphasized that the

19 

photo-oxidation reactor is quite different from that previously reported19,21 because its

20 

reaction tube does not surround the exterior of the UV lamp but is inserted and sealed

21 

within the lamp discharge, which significantly improves the transmission of vacuum

22 

UV light and allows highly efficient and uniform UV irradiation of the sample

23 

solution from all directions. This reactor generates both 254 nm and 185 nm of UV

24 

light, significantly improving the generation of strong oxidants (i.e., hydroxyl radical)

25 

for increasing the oxidation efficiencies of organics. To demonstrate the superior

26 

performance of the HE-POVG reactor, a conventional photo-oxidation reactor

27 

consisting of a coiled quartz tube (90 cm length × 2.0 mm i.d. × 3.0 mm o.d.) wrapped

28 

around a 20 W low pressure mercury vapor UV lamp (Philips, Holland) was also used

29 

for NPOC analysis. The GLS was connected to the HE-POVG reactor and the 5   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



PD-OES via silica tubing. The setup of the PD-OES is the same as that reported in the



previous work32, which is briefly described together with the setup of the DBD-OES



in Section 1 and 2 of the Supporting Information (SI). A picture of FI-HE-POVG-OES



system is presented in Figure S1 (See section 3 of the SI). The continuous HE-POVG



eliminated the six port injection valve but added the quartz GLS for online removal of



the generated CO2 from any inorganic carbon before the photo-oxidation of organics.



The full instrumental setup for continuous HE-POVG-PD-OES is described in Figure



S2.



The accuracy and practicality of this approach was validated via comparison of the

10 

analytical results obtained using the proposed system and a HTC-NDIR (Analytikjena

11 

multi N/C 2100 analyzer, Germany). The typical operation parameters for the

12 

HTC-NDIR analysis are: furnace temperature, 680 oC; sample volume, 200 µL;

13 

oxygen purge time, 180 s; and oxygen gas flow rate, 200 mL min-1.

14 

Reagents. All chemicals were of at least analytical-reagent grade. 18 MΩ cm

15 

deionized water (DIW) produced from a water purification system (Chengdu

16 

Ultrapure Technology Company, Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.) was

17 

boiled to remove the residual CO2 prior to its use for preparation of all solutions. A

18 

10000 mg L-1 of NPOC (as C) standard stock solutions were prepared by dissolving

19 

analytical-reagent grade potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP, C8H5KO4, Kelong

20 

Reagent Company, Chengdu, China) and stored in refrigerator at 4 oC before analysis.

21 

Standard solutions containing various concentrations of NPOC were prepared daily by

22 

diluting the stock solution with DIW. Argon (99.99%) obtained from Qiaoyuan Gas

23 

Company (Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China) was simultaneously employed as a

24 

carrier and discharge gas.

25 

Sample Collection. Water samples were collected from  artificial lakes located in 9

26 

municipal parks and rivers of Chengdu city. The sampling map and sites of the lakes

27 

are shown in Figure S3. All the samples were collected in 250 mL glass bottles and

28 

stored in an ice box. These samples were analyzed with the proposed system and the

29 

HTC-NDIR instrument as soon as possible after being transported to the laboratory.

30 

Detailed information about sample preparation is presented in Section 6 of the SI. 6   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 28

Page 7 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



Sample Analysis by FI-HE-POVG-PD-OES. The procedure for flow injection



NPOC analysis is described as follows. The standard or sample solution was acidified



using 10% phosphoric acid and purged for 3 min with 200 mL min-1 of Ar carrier gas



prior to NPOC analysis. The pretreated solution was initially pumped to a 0.5 mL



sample loop through a six-port valve. Then the valve was activated to pass DIW



carrier solution so as to flush the solution together with oxidizing solution (30% (m/v)



of Na2S2O8) through the photo-oxidation reactor for UV irradiation. Organics were



efficiently converted to CO2 in this process. In our previous work, the reaction



solution had to pass through a complex ice bath to ensure no condensed liquid

10 

droplets were transported to the DBD-OES, whereas it was directly swept into the

11 

GLS for the separation of CO2 in this work, simplifying the instrumental setup. The

12 

CO2 passed through the dryer before entering the PD-OES for the detection of carbon

13 

atomic emission

14 

Online and Continuous Monitoring of NPOC. The main purpose of this work is to

15 

develop a continuous monitoring system for the real time monitoring of NPOC in

16 

water system. In this case, the sampling tube was directly inserted into the pumped

17 

water flow and then the water sample was pumped to mix with 10% of phosphoric

18 

acid in a coil reaction tube (40 cm length × 2.0 mm i.d. × 3.0 mm o.d.) for the

19 

efficient reaction. The reaction mixture was swept into the first GLS wherein an Ar

20 

carrier gas was introduced to separate the generated CO2. It is worthwhile to note that

21 

a magnetic stir bar was put in the first GLS to stir the mixture for the completely

22 

removal of the CO2 from the TIC in the water sample. The mixture was further

23 

pumped into the photo-oxidation reactor together with the Na2S2O8 solution to

24 

produce CO2. Then CO2 was separated by the second GLS and finally detected by

25 

PD-OES.

26 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

27 

Preliminary Studies and Practicality of UV-POVG-PD-OES. The simple and

28 

inexpensive determination of TOC can be obtained by coupling MOVG to

29 

miniaturized DBD-OES.30 However, the MOVG-DBD-OES cannot be easily used for 7   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



continuous monitoring of NPOC because of the drawbacks of a conventional



microwave heating device. Despite its low oxidation capability, a conventional UV



photo-oxidation reactor is frequently used for the online and continuous degradation



of organics.20,33,34 As a consequence, an initial experiment was undertaken to use the



conventional photo-oxidation reactor as an alternative to the MOVG to realize the



continuous NPOC analysis with DBD-OES. A 0.5 mL aliquot of 50 mg L-1 (as C)



KHP solution was analyzed; results are shown in Figure 2a. Unexpectedly, the



specific carbon emissions at either 193.0 or 247.8 nm were not detected by the



DBD-OES system. It is possible that both the low oxidation efficiency of the

10 

conventional photo-oxidation reactor and the weak excitation capability of the DBD

11 

microplasma caused this result. Since the PD microplasma has higher excitation

12 

energy compared to the DBD,32 it replaced the DBD source and was coupled with the

13 

conventional photo-oxidation reactor for NPOC analysis. Interestingly, the specific

14 

carbon atomic emission (Figure 2a) was obviously observed with this setup, although

15 

the sensitivity is still much lower than that reported in previous work using the

16 

MOVG-DBD-OES. Sensitivity should be further improved if photo-oxidation

17 

efficiencies of organics are enhanced by using the high-efficiency photo-oxidation

18 

reactor. Tao et al.31 reported a home-made photo-oxidation reactor with remarkably

19 

high oxidation capability. This reactor could completely decompose persistent organo-

20 

arsenic compounds (e.g. arsenobetaine) to As (V) in 42 s, even in the absence of

21 

added oxidant, whereas over 6 h was needed for this complete decomposition with a

22 

conventional photo-oxidation reactor. Thus, a similar HE-POVG reactor was used to

23 

couple with the PD-OES for NPOC analysis. As can be seen from Figure 2a and b, the

24 

intensities of the carbon atomic emission spectra are  enhanced about 18-fold

25 

compared to those obtained using the conventional photo-oxidation reactor. According

26 

to previous work31, this remarkable improvement arises primarily due to the vacuum

27 

ultraviolet light at 185 nm and its high transmittance to the sample in this system.

28 

Actually, the photo-oxidation efficiency is increased by increasing the reaction

29 

temperature.35 To gain further insight into the HE-POVG reactor, a handheld infrared

30 

thermometer was used to measure the temperatures of the reaction tubes of the 8   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 28

Page 9 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



photo-oxidation reactors. The temperature of the HE-POVG reactor (50 ± 5 °C) was



much higher than that of conventional photo-oxidation reactor (30 ± 2 °C), suggesting



that the significant improvement of oxidation efficiency arises not only because of the



vacuum ultraviolet irradiation, but also due to the high reaction temperature.



It is noteworthy that although both carbon emission lines at 193.0 and 247.8 nm can



be observed with this system, emission at 193.0 nm was finally chosen for the NPOC



analysis because many strong emission bands in the spectral range 230−270 nm



(those belonged to the NO molecule emission bands) were detected,32,36 which lead to



serious spectral interference for the NPOC analysis. The linear coefficient obtained by

10 

the proposed system after analysis of a series of standard solutions containing various

11 

concentrations of KHP was better than 0.99 (Figure 2c), further supporting the

12 

feasibility and practicality of the HE-POVG-PD-OES for NPOC analysis.

13 

Optimization of Experimental Parameters and Investigation of Oxidation

14 

Efficiencies. In order to improve the analytical performance of the proposed system,

15 

both the operation conditions of the PD-OES (discharge voltage, discharge gap and

16 

flow rate of carrier gas) and UV photo-oxidation system (flow rate of carrier solution

17 

and concentration of Na2S2O8) were carefully optimized using 10.0 mg L-1 (as C)

18 

NPOC standard solutions. Results are summarized in Table S1 (See sections 7 of the

19 

SI).

20 

Since the organics contained in real water samples are quite different, the oxidation

21 

efficiencies of various organic compounds may severely affect the accuracy of the

22 

method. Therefore, three approaches were utilized to investigate the effect of the

23 

kinds of the organics in water on the oxidation efficiency of NPOC. Firstly, the

24 

oxidation efficiencies of 20 organic compounds (all contain 50 mg L-1 of NPOC (as

25 

C)) were investigated using the HE-POVG-PD-OES, as shown in Figure 3a. The

26 

results show that the relative oxidation efficiencies compared to that of KHP (set to

27 

100%) range from 88 to 110%, indicating that any difference between the oxidation

28 

efficiencies of the tested organics is not evident. Secondly, a series of solutions

29 

containing various concentrations (as C) of different organics were analyzed by the

30 

proposed system. The results summarized in Figure 3b show a calibration curve with 9   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



a linear coefficient of 0.995, showing the proposed system is capable of oxidizing



various organic compounds uniformly. Actually, some organics in real water are more



complex than these 20 organics, for example humic acids. Finally, the oxidation



efficiencies of humic acid or NPOC in real river water were studied. Since the exact



concentrations of humic acid and NPOC value are unknown, the oxidation efficiency



(En) is thus defined as:



E

n

% 

I1

I n  100  I2  I3  I4  I5



Where In is the intensity (a.u.) of carbon atomic emission obtained from the n-th



photo-oxidation (n=1, 2, 3, 4 or 5). As shown in Figure S6 (See Section 8 of SI), the

10 

oxidation efficiencies of humic acid and NPOC in river water from the first oxidation

11 

are higher than 85%. Meanwhile, the oxidation efficiencies of 20 mg L-1 KHP were

12 

also evaluated by this method and the results summarized in Figure S6 show that its

13 

first oxidation efficiency is 96%. These results indicate that the oxidation efficiencies

14 

for most of the dissolved organic matter even for humic acid are higher than 86%

15 

compared to that of KHP, implying that the HE-POVG-PD-OES can be employed for

16 

accurate NPOC analysis, regardless of the chemical forms of organic pollutants

17 

present in water samples.

18 

Effect of Acidified and Purged Procedures. In order to eliminate the interference

19 

from inorganic carbon, acidification and purging steps are required prior to NPOC

20 

analysis. A river water and a tap water were used to study the effect of inorganic

21 

carbon on NPOC analysis via analyzing these samples with or without such steps. The

22 

results are summarized in Figure 4 and show that the inorganic carbon present in the

23 

sample provides a serious interference on NPOC analysis. Fortunately, a simple

24 

pretreatment, including an acidification of sample using 10% (v/v) of phosphoric acid

25 

and a 3 min purge with 200 mL min-1 of Ar is able to efficiently eliminate this

26 

interference. These samples were also analyzed without acidification but with 3 min

27 

of purge, as shown in Figure 4. The results show that there is no obvious difference

28 

between the responses obtained with or without the purge, implying that the purgeable

29 

organic carbon is negligible in many surface and ground waters. These results agree 10   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 28

Page 11 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



well with those reported in previous studies22 and that the NPOC obtained by the



proposed method can be substituted for TOC in these sample analyses.



Interferences. It is well-known that interferences arising from co-existing anions,



particularly from chloride ion, present a serious problem with conventional COD



methods. For example, Dharmadhikari et al.8 reported that chloride ions seriously



interfere with the COD measurement using Cr(VI) as oxidizing reagent at



concentrations higher than 2 g L-1, making these methods unsuitable for the COD



analysis of the sample containing high concentration of chloride ions, such as sea



water. Our work30 showed that the MOVG-DBD-OES could be directly utilized for

10 

the TOC analysis of seawater because it possessed much higher resistance to

11 

interference by Cl-, even  at concentrations as high as 10 g L-1. However, UV

12 

persulfate oxidation of organics is different from that using microwave assisted

13 

oxidation. Therefore, the effects of some common anions (NO3-, PO43-, SO42-, and Cl-)

14 

and cations (Na+, K+, Fe3+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Ag+, Fe2+, and Ca2+) on the NPOC

15 

analysis by the proposed method were carefully investigated. As summarized in Table

16 

S2,  no significant interferences from the tested cations are evident, even at

17 

concomitant concentrations as high as 500 mg L-1. Moreover, the results also

18 

demonstrate that the interferences from 100.0 g L-1 of PO43- and SO42- are not present.

19 

However, 100.0 g L-1 of NO3- and Cl- induced serious interference on the NPOC

20 

analysis  and the recoveries decreased to 73% and 65%, respectively. To further

21 

explore the effects of NO3- and Cl-, different concentrations of NO3- and Cl- were

22 

added to standard solutions containing 10.0 mg L-1 KHP (as C) and analyzed by the

23 

proposed methods. As can be seen in Figure S7, recoveries were enhanced above 80%

24 

when the concentration of NO3- and Cl- were lower than 10 g L-1, which is sufficient

25 

for the routine analysis of NPOC in typical surface water samples.

26 

Analytical Performance. Under optimal condition, a series of NPOC standard

27 

solutions in the range of 0.5-5000 mg L-1 were analyzed by the HE-POVG-PD-OES.

28 

Results are summarized in Figure 5a,which show that linear range can be extended to

29 

200 mg L-1 and is limited by saturation of the CCD spectrometer. Thus, the calibration

30 

curve was finally constructed by analyzing a series of standard solutions with the 11   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



NPOC ranging from 0.5-200 mg L-1 (based on 0.5 mL sample volume), as shown in



Figure 5b. The linear correlation coefficient (R2) for the constructed calibration curve



is better than 0.999. The limits of detection (LOD), defined as the analyte



concentration equivalent to three times the standard deviation of 11 measurements of



a blank solution (UP water) divided by the slope of the calibration curve, was 0.05 mg



L-1. Figure S8 illustrates steady-state signals obtained for the 11 replicate



measurements of a 5 mg L-1 NPOC standard solution using the proposed system,



yielding a precision of 5.0% relative standard deviation (RSD). Table S3 summarizes



the analytical performance of this method and compares it with some other methods.

10 

The results indicate that the analytical performance of the proposed system is

11 

comparable to or better than that obtained by other techniques. It is noteworthy that

12 

although the sample consumption of the proposed system is reduced some 20-fold

13 

compared to the MOVG-DBD-OES (10 mL of sample volume), the obtained LOD

14 

remains comparable to that achieved by MOVG-DBD-OES, and the LOD is improved

15 

20-fold when the HE-POVG reactor was used as an alternative to the conventional

16 

photo-oxidation reactor. These may be a consequence of the high photo-oxidation

17 

vapor generation efficiency of the proposed reactor coupled with the high excitation

18 

capability of the PD microplasma. Moreover, this system can further provide several

19 

unique advantages for online, continuous monitoring as it comprises an inexpensive

20 

and miniature setup, requires low power consumption, reduces use of toxic chemicals

21 

and achieves a high sample throughput (1.5 min per sample).

22 

Sample Analysis with FI-HE-POVG-PD-OES. The utility and accuracy of the

23 

FI-HE-POVG-PD-OES system were validated by the determination of NPOC in real

24 

water samples. The lake water samples were simultaneously analyzed by the proposed

25 

system and by use of a commercial HTC-NDIR. Results are summarized in Table 1.

26 

The t test shows that there are no significant differences between the analytical results

27 

obtained by the proposed method and the HTC-NDIR at the 95% level of confidence.

28 

Secondly, the river water samples were also used to validate the accuracy of the

29 

proposed system via evaluation of the recoveries of the spiked NPOC. As can be seen

30 

from the data in Table 2, recoveries calculated from spiking standards into the real 12   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 28

Page 13 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



samples were in range of 91−111%, further confirming the accuracy and practicality



of the proposed system for NPOC analysis.



Online, Continuous Monitoring of NPOC in Water System. The aim of this work



was to develop a simple, inexpensive, online and continuous system for the



continuous monitoring of NPOC. Therefore, the feasibility of online inorganic carbon



removal was firstly investigated by using a river water sample. The sample was



separately analyzed both without any pretreatment and after an offline or online



acidification using 10% (v/v) phosphoric acid and Ar purge. As can be seen from



Figure 6a, the response obtained with online acidification and purge is almost the

10 

same as that obtained with the offline mode, indicating that inorganic carbon can be

11 

efficiently removed with the online acidification and purge and its interference can be

12 

online eliminated. Moreover, TIC can also be monitored online with this system via

13 

the detection of the CO2 generated from the acidification and purging of the sample,

14 

as shown in Figure 6a. The potential of online and continuous monitoring of NPOC

15 

by the proposed system was further evaluated by continuously monitoring the NPOC

16 

variation of a water sample flow, as shown in Figure 6b. In order to increase the

17 

NPOC value of the sample, KHP solution was gradually added to the sample flow.

18 

The results show that the signals quickly responded when the NPOC of sample flow

19 

changed. A calibration curve with linear coefficient of 0.999 could be obtained based

20 

on responses accorded by peak height, as shown in Figure S9. Moreover, the response

21 

rapidly dropped to the blank value as 18 MΩ cm DIW was introduced, showing no

22 

memory effect occurred in this system. These suggest that our developed system can

23 

accomplish online and continuous monitoring of NPOC.

24 

The practicality of long-term monitoring of real water was evaluated by continuous

25 

monitoring the NPOC of tap water (Figure S10). Figure 6c shows the results obtained

26 

after uninterrupted monitoring for more than 12 hours. After monitoring for 5.5 hours,

27 

a sharp response change is detected. This is because a solution containing a high

28 

concentration of glucose was gradually introduced into the flow of tap water, showing

29 

the rapid response of this system. These results strongly confirm the practicality of the

30 

HE-POVG-PD-OES for continuous and online monitoring of NPOC in real water. 13   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



In summary, a promising NPOC monitoring analyzer was developed for NPOC



analysis by coupling a specially designed photo-oxidation vapor generator and



miniaturized PD microplasma OES. Bestowed to the advantages of high oxidation



efficiencies of organics and continuous operation provided by the generator and high



excitation capability, inexpensive and simple setup, low power consumption offered



by the PD-OES, this system can be used to accomplish online, continuously and



inexpensive monitoring NPOC of real water. This will be very helpful to developing



countries, allowing the convenient determination and online control of water qualit.

9  10 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

11 

We gratefully acknowledge the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant

12 

Nos. 21575092 and 21622508) for financial support.

13 

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

14 

Supporting Information. Additional information as noted in text. This material is

15 

available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

16 

14   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 28

Page 15 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



Reference



(1) Eliasson, J. The rising pressure of global water shortages. Nature 2015, 517, 6.



(2) Nazareno, A. G.; Laurance, W. F. Brazil's drought: Beware deforestation. Science 2015, 347, 1427-1428.

4  5 

(3) Qiu, J. China drought highlights future climate threats. Nature 2010, 465, 142-143.

6  7 

(4) Tong, T. Z.; Elimelech, M. The global rise of zero liquid discharge for wastewater



management: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ. Sci. Technol.



2016, 50, 6846–6855.

10 

(5) Alsbaiee, A.; Smith, B. J.; Xiao, L. L.; Ling, Y. H.; Helbling, D. E.; Dichtel, W. R.

11 

Rapid removal of organic micropollutants from water by a porous β-cyclodextrin

12 

polymer. Nature 2016, 529, 190–194.

13 

(6) Namour, Ph.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N. Sensors for measuring biodegradable and total organic matter. TRAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 848-857.

14  15 

(7) Pang, H. L.; Kwok, H. Y.; Chan, P. H.; Yeung, C. H.; Lo, W.; Wong, K. Y.

16 

High-throughput determination of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) by a

17 

microplate-based biosensor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4038-4044.

18 

(8) Dharmadhikari, D. M.; Vanerkar, A. P.; Barhate, N. M. Chemical oxygen demand

19 

using closed microwave digestion system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39,

20 

6198-6201.

21 

(9) Yu, H. B.; Ma, C. J.; Quan, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, H. M. Flow injection analysis of

22 

chemical oxygen demand (COD) by using a boron-doped diamond (BDD)

23 

electrode. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 1935-1939.

24 

(10) Gutiérrez-Capitán, M.; Baldi, A.; Gómez, R.; García, V.; Jiménez-Jorquera, C.;

25 

Fernández-Sánchez, C. Electrochemical nanocomposite-derived sensor for the

26 

analysis of chemical oxygen demand in urban wastewaters. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87,

27 

2152–2160.

28 

(11) Zheng, Q.; Zhou, B.; Bai, J.; Li, L.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Cai, W.;

29 

Zhu, X. Self-organized TiO2 nanotube array sensor for the determination of 15   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

chemical oxygen demand. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 1044-1049.

1  2 

(12) Kim, Y. C.; Sasaki, S.; Yano, K.; Ikebukuro, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Karube, I.



Photocatalytic sensor for the determination of chemical oxygen demand using



flow injection analysis. Ana. Chim. Acta 2001, 432, 59-66.



(13) Su, Y. Y.; Li, X. H.; Chen, H.; Lv, Y.; Hou, X. D. Rapid, sensitive and on-line



measurement of chemical oxygen demand by novel optical method based on UV



photolysis and chemiluminescence. Microchem. J. 2007, 87, 56-61.



(14) Dan, D. Z.; Sandford, R. C.; Worsfold, P. J. Determination of chemical oxygen



demand in fresh waters using flow injection with on-line UV-photocatalytic oxidation and spectrophotometric detection. Analyst 2005, 130, 227-32.

10  11 

(15) Zhao, H. J.; Jiang, D. L.; Zhang, S. Q.; Catterall, K.; John, R. Development of a

12 

direct photoelectrochemical method for determination of chemical oxygen

13 

demand. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 155-160.

14 

(16) Yuan, S. J.; Mao, R.Y.;; Li. Y. G.; Zhang, Q. D.; Wang, H. Z. Layer-by-layer

15 

assembling TiO2 film from anatase TiO2 sols as the photoelectrochemical sensor

16 

for the determination of chemical oxygen demand. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 60,

17 

347-353.

18 

(17) Zhang, S. Q.; Jiang, D. L.; Zhao, H. J. Development of chemical oxygen

19 

demand on-line monitoring system based on a photoelectrochemical degradation

20 

principle. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 2363-2368.

21 

(18) Zhang, S. Q.; Li, L. H.; Zhao, H. J. A portable photoelectrochemical probe for

22 

rapid determination of chemical oxygen demand in wastewaters. Environ. Sci.

23 

Technol. 2009, 43, 7810-7815.

24 

(19) Fang, J. Y.; Shang, C. Bromate formation from bromide oxidation by the UV/persulfate process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 8976-83.

25  26 

(20) Armstrong, F. A. J.; Williams, P. M.; Strickland, J. D. H.  Photo-oxidation of

27 

Organic Matter in Sea Water by Ultra-violet Radiation, Analytical and Other

28 

Applications. Nature 1966, 211, 481−483.

29 

(21) Federer, U.; Kaufmann, P. R; Hutterli, M. A; Schupbach, S.; Stocker, T. F.

30 

Continuous flow analysis of total organic carbon in polar ice cores. Environ. Sci. 16   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 28

Page 17 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

Technol. 2008, 42, 8039-43.

1  2 

(22) Bisutti, I.; Hilke, I.; Raessler, M. Determination of total organic carbon - an overview of current methods. TRAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2004, 23, 716-726.

3  4 

(23) Panetta, R. J; Ibrahim, M.; Gelinas, Y. Coupling a high-temperature catalytic



oxidation total organic carbon analyzer to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer to



measure natural-abundance delta13C-dissolved organic carbon in marine and



freshwater samples. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 5232-9.



(24) Qian, J. G.; Mopper, K. Automated high-performance, high-temperature combustion total organic carbon analyzer. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 3090–3097.

9  10 

(25) Martin, P. E.; Barker, E. F. The infrared absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide. Phys. Rev. 1932, 41, 291.

11  12 

(26) Kieselbach, R. Continuous recording of concentration of organic matter in waste water. Anal. Chem. 1954, 26, 1312−1318.

13  14 

(27) Stroble, S. T.; Kounaves, S.P. An electrochemically based total organic carbon

15 

analyzer for planetary and terrestrial on-site applications. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84,

16 

6271-6276.

17 

(28) Seligson, D.; Seligson, H.  Microdetermination of carbon dioxide liberated by acidification or oxidation. Anal. Chem. 1951, 23, 1877−1878.

18  19 

(29) Fung, Y. S.; Wu, Z. C.; Dao, K. L. Determination of Total Organic Carbon in

20 

Water by Thermal Combustion-Ion Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68,

21 

2186−2190.

22 

(30) Han, B. J.; Jiang, X. M.; Hou, X. D.; Zheng, C. B. Miniaturized dielectric

23 

barrier

discharge

carbon

atomic

emission

spectrometry

with

online

24 

microwave-assisted oxidation for determination of total organic carbon. Anal.

25 

Chem. 2014, 86, 6214-6219.

26 

(31) Nakazato, T.; Tao, H. A high-efficiency photo-oxidation reactor for speciation of

27 

organic arsenicals by liquid chromatography - hydride generation - ICPMS. Anal.

28 

Chem. 2006, 78, 1665-1672.

29 

(32) Zhang, S.; Luo, H.; Peng, M. T.; Tian, Y. F.; Hou, X. D.; Jiang, X. M.; Zheng, C.

30 

B. Determination of Hg, Fe, Ni, and Co by miniaturized optical emission 17   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



spectrometry integrated with flow injection photochemical vapor generation and



point discharge. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 10712-10718.



(33) Rao, Y. F.; Chu, W. Reaction mechanism of linuron degradation in TiO2



suspension under visible light irradiation with the assistance of H2O2. Environ. Sci.



Technol. 2009, 43, 6183–6189.



(34) Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Irie, H.; Ohwaki. T. Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide



as visible-light-sensitive photocatalyst: designs, developments, and prospects.



Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9824–9852.



(35) Zhang, Y. Q.; Du, X. Z.; Huang, W. L. Temperature effect on the kinetics of persulfate oxidation of p-chloroaniline. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2011, 22, 358-361.

10  11 

(36) Leng, A. Q.; Lin, Y.; Tian, Y. F.; Wu, L.; Jiang, X. M. Hou, X. D.; Zheng, C. B.

12 

Pump- and valve-free flow injection capillary liquid electrode discharge optical

13 

emission spectrometry coupled to a droplet array platform. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89,

14 

703–710.

15 

(37) Pickhardt, W. P.; Oemler, A. N.; Mitchell, J. Determination of total carbon in

16 

organic materials by wet-dry combustion method. Anal. Chem. 1955, 27,

17 

1784−1788.

18 

(38) Maestre, S. E.; Mora, J.; Hernandis, V.; Todolí, J. L.  A system for the direct

19 

determination of the nonvolatile organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and

20 

inorganic carbon in water samples through inductively coupled plasma atomic

21 

emission spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 111−117.

22 

18   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 28

Page 19 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



Figure Captions



Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the FI-HE-POVG-PD-OES. GLS: gas liquid



separator.



Figure 2. (a) Optical emission spectrum obtained under different conditions; (b)



Comparison of the responses of carbon atomic emission at 193.0 nm using



HE-POVG-PD-OES and conventional POVG-PD-OES; and (c) Calibration curves



established using FI-HE-POVG-PD-OES. Experimental conditions: discharge voltage,



2.55 kV; discharge gap, 3 mm; Ar flow rate, 300 mL min-1; carrier solution flow rate,



3 mL min-1; the concentration of Na2S2O8 solution, 300 g L-1, and  CCD integration

10 

time, 100 ms.

11 

Figure 3. (a) Oxidation efficiencies of different organic compounds relative to KHP

12 

NPOC standard; and (b) Calibration curves established by analyzing sample

13 

containing different organics. Experimental conditions: discharge voltage, 2.55 kV;

14 

discharge gap, 3 mm; Ar flow rate, 300 mL min-1; carrier solution flow rate, 3 mL

15 

min-1; and the concentration of Na2S2O8 solution, 300 g L-1.

16 

Figure 4. Effect of acidification and purging on NPOC analysis.

17 

Figure 5. (a) Plots of carbon atomic emission intensity as a function of NPOC

18 

concentration from 0.5 to 5000 mg L−1, showing good linearity in the range 0.5 to 200

19 

mg L−1; and (b) Typical calibration curve using FI-HE-POVG-PD-OES. Experimental

20 

conditions: discharge voltage, 2.55 kV; discharge gap, 3 mm; Ar flow rate, 300 mL

21 

min-1; carrier solution flow rate, 3 mL min-1; and the concentration of Na2S2O8

22 

solution, 300 g L-1.

23 

Figure 6. (a) Comparison of the removal of inorganic carbon using online and offline

24 

acidification and purging; (b) Feasibility of analysis of NPOC by continuous

25 

HE-POVG-PD-OES; and (c) Continuous monitoring of NPOC in tap water using the

26 

proposed system. Experimental conditions: discharge voltage, 2.55 kV; discharge gap,

27 

3 mm; Ar flow rate, 300 mL min-1; carrier solution flow rate, 3 mL min-1; the

28 

concentration of Na2S2O8 solution, 300 g L-1; and the concentration of phosphoric

29 

acid, 10% (v/v).   

30  19   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



2  3 

Figure 1.



20   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 28

Page 21 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



2  3  4 

Figure 2.



21   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



2  3  4 

Figure 3.



22   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 28

Page 23 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1  2  3 

Figure 4.



23   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology



2  3 

Figure 5.

24   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 28

Page 25 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1  2 

Figure 6.



25   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 26 of 28



Table 1. Sample Detection Sample

Sampling location

UV-PVG-PD-OES -1 a

HTC-NDIR

(mg L )

(mg L-1)

1

Southwest Jiaotong University

7.03 ± 0.50

7.12 ± 0.06

2

Huanhuaxi Park-1

4.81 ± 0.22

5.22 ± 0.28

3

Huanhuaxi Park-2

1.92 ± 0.15

2.03 ± 0.21

4

Chenghua Park

1.97 ± 0.08

2.25 ± 0.20

5

Xinhua Park

5.24 ± 0.59

5.52 ± 0.43

6

Renmin Park

5.26 ± 0.25

5.41 ± 0.08

7

Wangjiang Park

1.37 ± 0.16

1.52 ± 0.03

8

Donghu Park

5.51 ± 0.48

5.81 ± 0.09

9

Tazishan Park

7.98 ± 0.20

8.15 ± 0.16

10

Mingyuan Lake

5.32 ± 0.34

5.56 ± 0.18

a

Average ± standard deviation of three trials.

2  3  4 

26   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology



Table 2. Sample Detection Samples

Added, mg L-1

Found, mg L-1a

Recovery, %

Drinking water

0.00

0.83 ± 0.13

-

2.00

2.88 ± 0.07

103

5.00

6.31 ± 0.37

110

0.00

6.37 ± 0.72

-

5.00

11.93 ± 0.77

111

0.00

4.53 ± 0.06

-

5.00

9.10 ± 0.53

91

0.00

5.30 ± 0.26

-

5.00

10.03 ± 0.95

95

0.00

12.40 ± 0.36

-

5.00

17.70 ± 0.46

106

10.00

22.30 ± 0.95

99

Fu river

Nan river

Funan river-1

Funan river-2

a

Average ± standard deviation of three trials.

2  3 

27   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

For TOC only



2  3 

28   

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 28 of 28