Conversion of Biomass into High-Quality Bio-oils ... - ACS Publications

Mar 14, 2017 - Omar D. Dacres,. †. Ryuichi Ashida,. ‡. Kouichi Miura,. §. Wenqiang Liu,. † and Hong Yao*,†. †. State Key Laboratory of Coal...
0 downloads 0 Views 827KB Size
Subscriber access provided by HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI KUTUPHANESI

Article

Conversion of biomass into high-quality bio-oils by degradative solvent extraction combined with subsequent pyrolysis Xianqing Zhu, Shan Tong, Xian LI, Yaxin Gao, Yang Xu, Omar D Dacres, Ryuichi Ashida, Kouichi Miura, Wenqiang Liu, and Hong Yao Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03162 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 20, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

Conversion of biomass into high-quality bio-oils by degradative

2

solvent extraction combined with subsequent pyrolysis

3

Xianqing Zhua, Shan Tonga, Xian Lia,*, Yaxin Gaoa, Yang Xua, Omar D. Dacresa, Ryuichi Ashidab, Kouichi

4

Miurac, Wenqiang Liua, Hong Yaoa,*

5

a

University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei Province, PR China;

6 7

b

10

Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto-Daigaku Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan;

8 9

State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong

c

Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto University, Kyoto-Daigaku Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan.

11

*Corresponding Author.

12

E-mail address: [email protected] (X. Li); [email protected](H. Yao)

13

Tel/Fax: +86-27-87545526

14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

15

Graphical abstract

16

Biomass

Degradative solvent extraction Deoxygenation

First stage

Soluble

Deposit/Residue

Pyrolysis Second stage Bio-oil

 Low oxygen content  Low acid content  more aromatic hydrocarbons

17 18 19

Proposed two-stage method for high-quality bio-oils production from raw biomass

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 2 of 33

Page 3 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

33

Energy & Fuels

Abstract

34

The rapid depletion of fossil fuels has attracted more attention being geared towards the fast pyrolysis of

35

biomass in order to produce bio-oils. However, the produced bio-oils usually contain high water, oxygen and

36

acids contents and low calorific values, which have limited their wide application. Therefore, in this study, a

37

novel two-stage method combining degradative solvent extraction with subsequent pyrolysis, was proposed

38

in order to improve the quality of derived bio-oils. The raw biomass was initially dewatered and

39

deoxygenated, by using a degradative solvent extraction method, to obtain a low-molecular-weight extract

40

(named “Soluble”). The Solubles were then pyrolyzed at 500 oC to prepare bio-oils. The carbon contents and

41

calorific values of bio-oils produced from the Solubles were as high as 90.09% and 44.63 MJ/kg respectively,

42

which were 1.5-2.0 times higher than those from the raw biomasses. In addition, the water and oxygen

43

contents of bio-oils from the Solubles were significantly lower than the bio-oils from the raw biomasses.

44

Furthermore, the bio-oils from the Solubles contained much fewer corrosive and reactive acids, and more

45

value-added aromatic hydrocarbons compared to those from raw biomasses. In summary, the quality of the

46

bio-oils produced from the Solubles was obviously superior to the bio-oils from the direct pyrolysis of the

47

raw biomasses. It was shown that degradative solvent extraction combined with subsequent pyrolysis is an

48

effective method to convert raw biomasses into high-quality bio-oils.

49 50

Keywords: Biomass; Degradative solvent extraction; Deoxygenation; Pyrolysis; Bio-oils

51 52 53 54 55 56

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

57

Page 4 of 33

1. Introduction

58

With the fast depletion of fossil oils, renewable resources are increasingly considered as potential

59

substitutes for energy production.1 Among various renewable resources, biomass is the only sustainable

60

carbon resource that can be directly converted into fuels or chemicals via biochemical conversion processes

61

(such as hydrolysis and fermentation) and thermochemical conversion processes (such as pyrolysis,

62

gasification, liquefaction, hydrothermal carbonization).2-6 Fast pyrolysis of biomass has been growingly

63

taken as a promising technology which converts biomass feedstock into bio-oil, char and gas products under

64

inert atmosphere in a very short residence time (< 2 s).7-11 The bio-oils, whose yield can reach up to 60%,

65

have shown the potential to be used as fuels in furnaces or engines and feedstocks for value-added chemicals

66

production.12 The bio-oils, however, are always not suitable for direct commercial application. Due to the

67

high oxygen contents of biomass, the bio-oils produced from direct pyrolysis of biomasses are a complex

68

mixture consisting of hundreds of oxygenated compounds with high water and oxygen contents (35%-45%),

69

high corrosive acids contents and low calorific value.13,14 These drawbacks have limited the widespread

70

application of the bio-oils.

71

Various methods have been developed to improve the quality of bio-oils, such as hydro-treating of the

72

produced bio-oils, catalytic reforming of pyrolysis vapors, emulsification, and thermochemical pretreatment

73

of biomass prior to pyrolysis such as torrefaction.15-18 Generally, these methods are found to be effective for

74

bio-oils upgrading to some extent. However, there are some issues needed to be resolved for the practical

75

utilization of these methods, such as complicated equipment, severe conditions, catalyst deactivation, and

76

ash-related problems.

77

Recently, a novel method, named degradative solvent extraction (DSE), has been put forward by the

78

authors to achieve the deoxygenation and upgrading of a diversity of biomass wastes.19,20 In this method, the

79

biomass feedstocks were treated a non-polar solvent at mild temperature (lower than 350 oC). Raw

80

biomasses are decomposed and separated into three major solid products: an unextractable component ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

81

(named “Residue”) and two extracts (one is a solvent-insoluble component at ambient temperature, termed

82

as “Deposit”, and another is a solvent-soluble component at ambient temperature, termed as “Soluble”). The

83

solid Soluble is then acquired by evaporating the solvent using vacuum distillation. The Soluble exhibits

84

high carbon content (more than 80%), low oxygen content (less than 15%) and moderate molecular weight

85

of approximately 300. Furthermore, the Solubles contain nearly no moisture and ash. In view of the

86

favorable properties of the Solubles, it seems highly feasible for further pyrolysis of the Solubles to produce

87

high-quality bio-oils for fuels or chemical precursors.

88

Therefore, in this study, the feasibilities of a two-stage conversion of biomass feedstocks (combining

89

the degradative solvent extraction with subsequent pyrolysis) to prepare high-quality bio-oils were explored.

90

Two typical biomasses, a non-woody biomass and a woody biomass, were initially treated by degradative

91

solvent extraction to produce the Solubles, and then the Solubles were further pyrolyzed to obtain bio-oils.

92

The properties and compositions of bio-oils prepared from the pyrolysis of the Solubles and raw biomasses

93

were investigated and compared in detail.

94

2. Experimental

95

2.1. Biomass sample and solvent used

96

Two representative biomass samples from China, a non-woody biomass (rice straw, abbreviated to RS)

97

and a woody biomass (fir sawdust, abbreviated to SD), were used as raw materials. The properties of the raw

98

materials are listed in Table 1. 1-Methylnaphthalene, which is a non-polar and stable solvent and can’t

99

dissolve water and inorganic compounds, was selected for the DSE experiments. 19

100

2.2. Degradative solvent extraction

101

The diagram of the reaction apparatus for the DSE experiments is presented in Fig. 1. This apparatus

102

consisted of an autoclave and a reservoir. A filter was installed at the bottom of the autoclave. The autoclave

103

and the reservoir were collected by a valve. On each trial, the autoclave was first loaded with the mixture of

104

approximately 30 g of raw biomass and 300 mL of 1-Methylnaphthalene.21 After being purged by N2 several ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 33

105

times, the autoclave was sealed with N2 and heated up to 350 oC with the heating rate of 5 oC/min, and held

106

for 60 min. Afterwards, the valve above the reservoir was quickly opened to transfer the mixture of the

107

solvent and the extracts into the reservoir, achieving the separation of the extracts and Residue. Then the

108

autoclave and the reservoir were quenched to ambient temperature. A portion of the extracts, which

109

precipitated in the reservoir at ambient temperature, was obtained by filtration and was called “Deposit”.

110

The other portion of the solid extracts, which remained soluble in the solvent at ambient temperature, was

111

acquired by evaporating the solvent through vacuum distillation and was called “Soluble”. Subsequently, the

112

residual solvent remaining in the three solid products (Deposit, Soluble and Residue) was adequately

113

removed by further drying in a vacuum oven at 150 oC for more than 8 h. The gaseous products (Gas) were

114

collected and quantitatively analyzed by the Agilent MicroGC3000 gas chromatograph. The liquid products

115

produced during the degradative solvent process were called "Liquid". When the reservoir was cooled down,

116

the Liquid was mixed with the solvent. And most of the Liquid was removed together with the solvent

117

during the separation of solvent and the Soluble by rotary evaporator. The yields of Residue, Deposit,

118

Soluble, and Gas were calculated by their mass fractions. Then the Liquid yield was determined by mass

119

balance. Duplicate experiments were conducted and the average values of the yields were reported.

120

2.3. Pyrolysis experiment procedure.

121

The raw biomasses and the Solubles were pyrolyzed in a fixed bed reactor, as shown in Fig. 2. The fixed

122

bed reactor was mainly composed of a horizontal tube furnace, and two ice-water condensers. On each trial,

123

around 1 g of raw biomass or Soluble was loaded into the quartz boat and placed at the entrance of furnace

124

which was cooled down by circulating cooling water. The reactor was kept in an inert atmosphere by a flow

125

of highly pure nitrogen (500 mL/min, 99.999%) during the pyrolysis process. After the reactor was heated to

126

500 oC, the quartz boat was moved swiftly from the entrance to the constant temperature zone (500 oC) of the

127

reactor. Then the sample was rapidly heated and decomposed. The condensable volatiles (bio-oil) that

128

evolved out were collected by two ice-water condensers whereas the non-condensable volatiles (gas ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

129

products) were cleaned by two glass wool filters and collected by a gas bag. The collected gas products were

130

quantitatively measured using the Agilent MicroGC3000 gas chromatograph. The yields of the pyrolysis

131

char and gas products were determined by their respective weights. The yield of the bio-oil (including water)

132

was determined by mass balance. Each pyrolysis trial was conducted more than three times, and the mean

133

values were reported with the experiment error less than 3.0%.

134

2.4. Products characterization

135

The elemental analyses of the samples were carried out by the Vario CHN EL-2 elemental analyzer, and

136

the proximate analyses of the samples were conducted in a muffle furnace based on GB/T212-2008. The

137

chemical structures of solid samples were analyzed using a solid-sate 13C-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

138

(NMR) spectrometer. The solid-sate

139

were recorded and curve-fitted into several Gaussian peaks and Lorentz peaks prior to integration. Thermal

140

degradation behaviors of biomasses and the Solubles were measured by thermogravimetric analysis using

141

the PerkinElmer TG/DTA analyzer. On each run, around 10 mg of sample was heated to 900 oC under inert

142

atmosphere at the heating rate of 10 oC/min.

13

C NMR spectra with Cross-Polarization Magic Spinning (CP/MAS)

143

It is rather difficult to collect all of the bio-oils during the pyrolysis process for the chemical constitution

144

analysis. Therefore, the Py-GC/MS analyses of the Solubles and raw biomasses were also performed for the

145

chemical constitution characterization. The Py-GC/MS apparatus was a pyrolyzer (Frontier PY-3030D)

146

directly connected to a GC/MS system (Agilent 7890/5975). The pyrolysis temperature was also at 500 oC.

147

The chromatographic separation of the produced volatiles was carried out using a DB-5MS capillary

148

column. Highly pure helium (99.999%) was employed as the carrier gas (1 mL/min). The oven temperature

149

was initially maintained at 40 oC for 10 mins, and then heated up to 280 oC with the heating rate of 10

150

o

151

based on the NIST MS library and previous publications. The Py-GC/MS experiments were repeated to

152

guarantee the validity and reproducibility.

C/min, and sustained for another 5 mins at 280 oC. The peaks of chromatographic spectra were determined

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

7

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

153

3. Results and Discussion

154

3.1. Yields and basic properties of DSE products

Page 8 of 33

155

Fig. 3 shows the distributions of products yields for DSE of SD and RS. It was found that the Solubles

156

were the main solid product. The yields of Solubles produced from RS and SD were 24.3% and 40.2%

157

respectively. A respectable amount of CO2 and Liquids were formed during the extraction. It was reported in

158

our previous works that the Liquid mainly consisted of H2O.19 This indicates a large amount of oxygen in

159

raw biomasses is removed as H2O and CO2. Table 1 presents the basic properties of the raw biomasses and

160

the extraction products. In comparison to raw biomasses, the Solubles and Deposits had rather higher carbon

161

content (more than 80%) and lower oxygen content (less than 12%), suggesting that remarkable

162

deoxygenation reactions took place during the DSE process. Also, the significantly lower H/C as well as

163

O/C ratios in the Soluble, as shown in Table 1, indicates that the Solubles may contain more aromatic

164

structures compared to raw biomasses. Moreover, the Solubles contained virtually no ash, making them

165

advantageous in mitigating the ash-related problems during the subsequent pyrolysis process. Another

166

product (Deposit) can be used for other purposes, such as additives for coke-making blends to improve coke

167

quality.21 This work focused on the bio-oils production from the Solubles.

168

3.2. Chemical structure characterization and decomposition behaviors of raw biomasses and Solubles

169

The chemical structures of raw materials for pyrolysis will significantly influence the chemical

170

compositions and quality of bio-oils. Hence, it is essential to analyze the chemical structures of the Solubles

171

and raw biomasses before their pyrolysis process commencing. The CP/MAS

172

Solubles and raw biomasses were carried out to evaluate their chemical structure differences, as displayed in

173

Fig. 4. The determination of each carbon type was identified according to literatures.22,23 From Fig. 4, it can

174

be observed that the Solubles and the raw biomasses exhibited completely different chemical structures. The

175

spectra of RS and SD revealed obvious peaks of oxygenated aliphatic carbons (especially 50-90 ppm),

176

which were the typical carbon species ascribed to the cellulose and hemicellulose in raw biomasses. Only ACS Paragon Plus Environment

8

13

C NMR analyses of the

Page 9 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

177

weak signals attributed to aromatic carbons (110-170 ppm) were observed in the spectra of raw RS and SD.

178

Differing from raw RS and SD, the characteristic structures of biomasses (oxygen-substituted alkyl carbons,

179

O-alkyl) were no longer present in the Solubles, while the intensities of the peaks attributed to the methyl

180

carbons (–CH3), methylene carbons (–CH2), aromatic carbons (Ar-C and Ar-H) greatly increased.

181

To further quantitatively characterize the chemical structures of the materials, the overlap

13

C NMR

182

spectra of the Solubles and their raw biomasses were deconvolved and curve-fitted into several Gaussian

183

peaks and Lorentz peaks prior to integration based on previous studies.24,25 Fig. 5 shows the deconvolution

184

spectrum of

185

estimated according to the fitted peaks and presented in Table 2. The O-alkyl carbons in RS and SD were as

186

high as 75.2% and 58.9% respectively, while those in the Solubles were nearly 0, suggesting that the

187

oxygen-containing functional groups were dramatically removed during the DSE process. This is in

188

agreement with the ultimate analysis shown in Table 1. The aromaticities of raw RS and SD were as low as

189

8.0% and 22.7%, while those of their Solubles increased to 48.3% and 56.7% respectively. The low contents

190

of the oxygen-containing functional groups and high contents of aromatic carbons in the Solubles are

191

expected to produce bio-oils having low oxygen contents and more value-added aromatic hydrocarbons,

192

which is beneficial to the utilizations of the bio-oils not only as high calorific value liquid fuels but also as

193

precursors for chemicals.

13

C NMR spectrum of RS-Soluble as an example. The distributions of carbon were then

194

Prior to the pyrolysis process, the thermal degradation behaviors of raw biomasses and the obtained

195

Solubles were probed and explicated by thermogravimetric analysis for the pyrolysis conditions

196

confirmation, as displayed in Fig. 6. It was observed that prominent differences existed between the

197

decomposition behaviors of the Solubles and raw biomasses. The Solubles exhibited much smaller weight

198

decreasing rate within a rather broad decomposition temperature band (200-500 oC). These differences

199

should be attributed to the chemical structure differences between the Solubles and raw biomasses, as shown

200

in Fig. 4. The weight losses of both raw biomasses and the Solubles after 500 oC were negligible, so 500 oC ACS Paragon Plus Environment

9

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

201

was selected as the pyrolysis temperature for the subsequent pyrolysis.

202

3.3. Yields and basic properties of pyrolysis products.

Page 10 of 33

203

Fig. 7 demonstrates the yield distributions of pyrolysis products of raw biomasses and the Solubles. The

204

bio-oil yields of RS-Soluble and SD-Soluble were 48.14% and 58.83% respectively, slightly higher than the

205

yields of the bio-oils from the corresponding raw biomasses. In contrast, the gas yields from the Solubles

206

pyrolysis were a bit lower.

207

The properties of the pyrolysis products are another important concern. Table 3 shows the elemental

208

composition, ash content and higher heating value (HHV) of the bio-oils and chars. The HHV was

209

calculated by Dulong equation.26 The carbon contents of the bio-oils from SD-Soluble and RS-Soluble were

210

90.09% and 87.49% respectively, remarkably higher than those from raw SD and RS. Furthermore, the

211

oxygen contents of the bio-oils from SD-Soluble and RS-Soluble were as low as 0.92% and 0.62%

212

respectively, extremely lower than those of the raw biomasses. Hence, the bio-oils from the Solubles

213

contained significantly lower O/C atomic ratios than those of the raw biomasses. The relative higher H/C

214

atomic ratios of the bio-oils from raw biomasses mainly resulted from their high water contents. 27 It is

215

worthy to note that the water contents of the bio-oils derived from the Solubles should be lower than 1.0%,

216

since the total oxygen content of the bio-oils (including water) prepared from Solubles were lower than

217

1.0%, as shown in Table 3. Additionally, the HHVs of the bio-oils from RS-Soluble and SD-Soluble were

218

44.63 and 42.32 MJ/kg respectively, which are approximate to the HHVs of commercial gasoline or diesel

219

(42-46 MJ/kg), 28,29 and significantly higher than those of the raw biomasses.

220

The char is also an important by-product for biomass pyrolysis technologies. The high carbon contents

221

(as high as 89.21%) and approximately zero ash contents of the chars from the Solubles pyrolysis, as shown

222

in Table 3, implies that these chars could be used for some value-added applications, such as carbon material

223

production and high-quality solid fuel. This is an additional advantage of the proposed two-stage method

224

over other technologies. ACS Paragon Plus Environment

10

Page 11 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

225

The elemental composition evolution of the two-stage method was visually described in the form of the

226

Van Krevelen diagram,30 as displayed in Fig. 8. It was observed that the first step: the degradative solvent

227

extraction process, from raw biomasses to the Solubles, generally corresponded to the trends of

228

decarboxylation and dehydration processes. And the second step: namely the pyrolysis process, from the

229

Solubles to bio-oils, experienced further decarboxylation process.

230

3.4. Chemical constitution of produced bio-oils.

231

Fig. 9 shows the relative contents of the organic constituents of the bio-oils produced from raw

232

biomasses and the Solubles by normalization of the peak areas of the GC−MS spectra. The constituents of

233

the bio-oils were classified into oxygen-containing compounds (ketones and ethers, phenols, acids),

234

hydrocarbons (aromatic hydrocarbons and aliphatic hydrocarbons), and others (such as nitrogen-containing

235

compounds and unidentified compounds). It was found that distinct differences existed between the

236

compositions of the bio-oils from raw biomasses and the corresponding Solubles. The bio-oils obtained from

237

raw biomasses mainly consisted of oxygen-containing compounds (such as ketones, ethers, phenols and

238

acids), which accounted for 66.97% and 72.36% for RS and SD, respectively. On the other hand, the

239

oxygen-containing compounds in the bio-oils from RS-Soluble and SD-Soluble were as low as 16.82% and

240

24.34% respectively. It is well established that a majority of oxygen-containing compounds in bio-oil have

241

high reactivity, acidity, and will therefore cause a series of problems for the storage and utilization of

242

bio-oils, such as low thermal stability and high corrosiveness.31 The bio-oils from the Solubles mainly

243

consisted of aromatic hydrocarbons, which accounted for 66.04% and 48.06% for RS-Soluble and

244

SD-Soluble, respectively. This is a result of the rich aromatic structures in the Solubles, as shown in Table 2.

245

Consequently, the remarkable oxygen removal during the DSE process of raw biomass, significantly

246

reduced the formation of oxygen-containing compounds and improved the contents of aromatic

247

hydrocarbons in the bio-oils during the subsequent pyrolysis process of the Solubles. Hence, the high yields

248

of the aromatic hydrocarbons in the produced bio-oils from the Solubles pyrolysis are very meritorious, ACS Paragon Plus Environment

11

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 33

249

because such aromatic hydrocarbons are highly value-added products and have tremendous potential in

250

being utilized as chemicals.31,33

251

3.5. Comparison of the proposed two-stage method with other main bio-oil production/upgrading

252

technologies.

253

The differences between the proposed two-stage method with other main bio-oil production/upgrading

254

technologies (direct biomass pyrolysis without catalyst,4,18,34,35 catalytic pyrolysis,36-38 hydrodeoxygenation

255

of bio-oil,39-42 and pyrolysis after torrefaction43-46) were briefly compared, as presented in Table 4. The total

256

mass yield, carbon-based yield, and energy yield are all based on dry raw biomass. The mass yields of the

257

bio-oils produced by the proposed two-stage method were somewhat lower than those produced by other

258

technologies, such as direct biomass pyrolysis without catalyst and catalytic pyrolysis. However, the water

259

contents and the oxygen contents of the bio-oils produced by the two-stage method were extremely lower

260

than those produced by other technologies. This resulted in the HHVs of the bio-oils produced by the

261

two-stage method, to be approximately 1.5-2.0 times higher than those produced by the other technologies.

262

Also, the carbon-based yields and energy yields of the bio-oils produced by the two-stage method were

263

comparable to those produced by the other technologies. In addition, another advantage of the proposed

264

two-stage method is that it does not require any catalyst. Thus, the significant advantages of bio-oils

265

production from the Solubles were shown. Through further optimizations of the conditions in the first stage

266

of the DSE and in the second stage of pyrolysis, the bio-oil yield could be further improved and more

267

acceptable in our future work. Consequentially, the two-stage method could be one of the promising

268

methods for high-quality bio-oil production.

269

4. Conclusion

270

The combination of degradative solvent extraction of biomass with subsequent pyrolysis of the low

271

-molecular-weight extract (the Solubles) to produce high-quality bio-oils was proposed in this study. The

272

biomass was initially dewatered, deoxygenated and fractionated by degradative solvent extraction to obtain ACS Paragon Plus Environment

12

Page 13 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

273

the Solubles. The Solubles was then pyrolyzed at 500 oC to prepare bio-oils. The Solubles had much lower

274

oxygen contents and more aromatic structures in comparison with raw biomasses. Meanwhile, the carbon

275

contents and HHVs of the bio-oils from the Solubles were as high as 90.09% and 44.63 MJ/m3 respectively,

276

which were remarkably higher than the bio-oils from the raw biomasses. The oxygen and water contents of

277

bio-oils prepared from the Solubles pyrolysis were significantly lower than the bio-oils from the

278

corresponding biomasses. In comparison with the bio-oils from raw biomasses, the bio-oils from the

279

Solubles contained fewer corrosive acids, and more value-added aromatic hydrocarbons. In conclusion, the

280

quality of the bio-oils produced from the pyrolysis of Solubles was obviously superior to the bio-oils from

281

the direct pyrolysis of raw biomasses. Additionally, the carbon-based yields and energy yields of the bio-oils

282

produced by the two-stage method were comparable to those produced by the other bio-oil upgrading

283

technologies. Therefore, the high feasibilities of the two-stage method to produce high-quality bio-oils were

284

shown.

285

AUTHOR INFORMATION

286

Corresponding Authors

287

* E-mail: [email protected] ; Tel/Fax: +86-27-87545526

288

* E-mail: [email protected]; Tel/Fax: +86-27-87545526

289

Notes

290

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

291

Acknowledgments

292

This study was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers U1510119,

293

21306059, 51306063), International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (grant number

294

2015DFA60410), and Graduates' Innovation Fund, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The

295

authors also greatly appreciate the measurements assistances provided by the Analytical and Testing Center ACS Paragon Plus Environment

13

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 33

296

of Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

297 298

References:

299

(1) Ullah, K., Kumar Sharma, V., Dhingra, S., Braccio, G., Ahmad, M., Sofia, S. Assessing the lignocellulosic biomass

300

resources potential in developing countries: A critical review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 682-698.

301

(2) Wang, B., Cao, J., Zhao, X., Bian, Y., Song, C., Zhao, Y., Fan, X., Wei, X., Takarada, T. Preparation of nickel-loaded

302

on lignite char for catalytic gasification of biomass. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 136, 17-24.

303

(3) Calucci, L., Rasse, D. P., Forte, C. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of chars obtained from

304

hydrothermal carbonization of corncob and miscanthus. Energy Fuels 2012, 27, 303-309.

305

(4) Zhang, L., Xu, C. C., Champagne, P. Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass. Energy

306

Convers. Manage. 2010, 51, 969-982.

307

(5) Wang, G., Li, W., Li, B., Chen, H. TG study on pyrolysis of biomass and its three components under syngas. Fuel 2008,

308

87, 552-558.

309

(6) Song, C., Hu, H., Zhu, S., Wang, G., Chen, G. Nonisothermal catalytic liquefaction of corn stalk in subcritical and

310

supercritical water. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 90-96.

311

(7) Subagyono, R. R. D. J., Qi, Y., Jackson, W. R., Chaffee, A. L. Pyrolysis-GC/MS analysis of biomass and the bio-oils

312

produced from CO/H2O reactions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2016, 120, 154-164.

313

(8) Wiinikka, H., Carlsson, P., Johansson, A., Gullberg, M., Ylipää, C., Lundgren, M., Sandström, L. Fast Pyrolysis of Stem

314

Wood in a Pilot-Scale Cyclone Reactor. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 3158-3167.

315

(9) Cao, J., Xiao, X., Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Sato, K., Ogawa, Y., Wei, X., Takarada, T. Preparation and characterization of

316

bio-oils from internally circulating fluidized-bed pyrolyses of municipal, livestock, and wood waste. Bioresour. Technol.

317

2011, 102, 2009-2015.

318

(10) Meesuk, S., Cao, J., Sato, K., Ogawa, Y., Takarada, T. Fast pyrolysis of rice husk in a fluidized bed: effects of the gas

319

atmosphere and catalyst on bio-oil with a relatively low content of oxygen. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 4113-4121.

320

(11) Worasuwannarak, N., Sonobe, T., Tanthapanichakoon, W. Pyrolysis behaviors of rice straw, rice husk, and corncob by

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

14

Page 15 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

321

TG-MS technique. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2007, 78, 265-271.

322

(12) Bridgwater, A. V. Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 2003, 91, 87-102.

323

(13) Huang, X., Cao, J., Shi, P., Zhao, X., Feng, X., Zhao, Y., Fan, X., Wei, X., Takarada, T. Influences of pyrolysis

324

conditions in the production and chemical composition of the bio-oils from fast pyrolysis of sewage sludge. J. Anal. Appl.

325

Pyrolysis 2014, 110, 353-362.

326

(14) Neves, D., Thunman, H., Matos, A., Tarelho, L., Gómez-Barea, A. Characterization and prediction of biomass

327

pyrolysis products. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2011, 37, 611-630.

328

(15) Chen, Y., Yang, H., Yang, Q., Hao, H., Zhu, B., Chen, H. Torrefaction of agriculture straws and its application on

329

biomass pyrolysis poly-generation. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 156, 70-77.

330

(16) Elliott, D. C., Hart, T. R., Neuenschwander, G. G., Rotness, L. J., Olarte, M. V., Zacher, A. H., Solantausta, Y.

331

Catalytic hydroprocessing of fast pyrolysis bio-oil from pine sawdust. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 3891-3896.

332

(17) Jiang, X.,Ellis, N. Upgrading bio-oil through emulsification with biodiesel: mixture production. Energy Fuels 2009, 24,

333

1358-1364.

334

(18) Zhang, Q., Chang, J., Wang, T., Xu, Y. Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energy

335

Convers. Manage. 2007, 48, 87-92.

336

(19) Zhu, X., Xue, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Z., Sun, W., Ashida, R., Miura, K., Yao, H. Mechanism study of degradative solvent

337

extraction of biomass. Fuel 2016, 165, 10-18.

338

(20) Wannapeera, J., Li, X., Worasuwannarak, N., Ashida, R., Miura, K. Production of High-Grade Carbonaceous Materials

339

and Fuel Having Similar Chemical and Physical Properties from Various Types of Biomass by Degradative Solvent

340

Extraction. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 4521-4531.

341

(21) Zhu, X., Li, X., Xiao, L., Zhang, X., Tong, S., Wu, C., Ashida, R., Liu, W., Miura, K., Yao, H. Novel carbon-rich

342

additives preparation by degradative solvent extraction of biomass wastes for coke-making. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 207,

343

85-91.

344

(22) Cao, X., Pignatello, J. J., Li, Y., Lattao, C., Chappell, M. A., Chen, N., Miller, L. F., Mao, J. Characterization of wood

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

15

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 33

345

chars produced at different temperatures using advanced solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopic techniques. Energy Fuels 2012,

346

26, 5983-5991.

347

(23) Gupta, R. Advanced coal characterization: a review. Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 451-460.

348

(24) Lin, X., Wang, C., Ideta, K., Miyawaki, J., Nishiyama, Y., Wang, Y., Yoon, S., Mochida, I. Insights into the functional

349

group transformation of a chinese brown coal during slow pyrolysis by combining various experiments. Fuel 2014, 118,

350

257-264.

351

(25) Wang, S., Tang, Y., Schobert, H. H., Guo, Y. N., Su, Y. FTIR and 13C NMR investigation of coal component of late

352

Permian coals from southern China. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 5672-5677.

353

(26) Mott, R. A.,Spooner, C. E. The calorific value of carbon in coal: the Dulong relationship. Fuel 1940, 19, 242.

354

(27) Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., Steele, P. H. Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil:  A Critical Review. Energy Fuels

355

2006, 20, 848-889.

356

(28) Ma, Y., Huang, S., Huang, R., Zhang, Y., Xu, S. Ignition and combustion characteristics of n-pentanol–diesel blends in

357

a constant volume chamber. Appl. Energ. 2017, 185, Part 1, 519-530.

358

(29) Yücesu, H. S., Topgül, T., Çinar, C., Okur, M. Effect of ethanol–gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust

359

emissions in different compression ratios. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2006, 26, 2272-2278.

360

(30) Van Krevelen, D. W. Graphical-statistical method for the study of structure and reaction processes of coal. Fuel 1950,

361

29, 269-284.

362

(31) Meng, J., Moore, A., Tilotta, D. C., Kelley, S. S., Adhikari, S., Park, S. Thermal and Storage Stability of Bio-Oil from

363

Pyrolysis of Torrefied Wood. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 5117-5126.

364

(32) Carlson, T. R., Cheng, Y., Jae, J., Huber, G. W. Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic fast pyrolysis of

365

wood sawdust. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 145-161.

366

(33) Vispute, T. P., Zhang, H., Sanna, A., Xiao, R., Huber, G. W. Renewable chemical commodity feedstocks from

367

integrated catalytic processing of pyrolysis oils. Science 2010, 330, 1222-1227.

368

(34) Lehto, J., Oasmaa, A., Solantausta, Y., Kytö, M., Chiaramonti, D. Review of fuel oil quality and combustion of fast

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

16

Page 17 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

369

pyrolysis bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Energ. 2014, 116, 178-190.

370

(35) Bridgwater, A. V. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 38, 68-94.

371

(36) Wang, P., Zhan, S., Yu, H., Xue, X., Hong, N. The effects of temperature and catalysts on the pyrolysis of industrial

372

wastes (herb residue). Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3236-3241.

373

(37) Pütün, E. Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: Effects of pyrolysis temperature, sweeping gas flow rate and MgO catalyst.

374

Energy 2010, 35, 2761-2766.

375

(38) Zhang, H., Xiao, R., Wang, D., Zhong, Z., Song, M., Pan, Q., He, G. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass in a fluidized

376

bed with fresh and spent fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 6199-6206.

377

(39) Elkasabi, Y., Mullen, C. A., Pighinelli, A. L. M. T., Boateng, A. A. Hydrodeoxygenation of fast-pyrolysis bio-oils from

378

various feedstocks using carbon-supported catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 123, 11-18.

379

(40) Kim, T., Oh, S., Kim, J., Choi, I., Choi, J. W. Study on the hydrodeoxygenative upgrading of crude bio-oil produced

380

from woody biomass by fast pyrolysis. Energy 2014, 68, 437-443.

381

(41) Wang, Y., He, T., Liu, K., Wu, J., Fang, Y. From biomass to advanced bio-fuel by catalytic pyrolysis/hydro-processing:

382

Hydrodeoxygenation of bio-oil derived from biomass catalytic pyrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 108, 280-284.

383

(42) de Miguel Mercader, F., Groeneveld, M. J., Kersten, S. R., Geantet, C., Toussaint, G., Way, N. W., Schaverien, C. J.,

384

Hogendoorn, K. J. Hydrodeoxygenation of pyrolysis oil fractions: process understanding and quality assessment through

385

co-processing in refinery units. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 985-997.

386

(43) Chen, Y., Yang, H., Yang, Q., Hao, H., Zhu, B., Chen, H. Torrefaction of agriculture straws and its application on

387

biomass pyrolysis poly-generation. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 156, 70-77.

388

(44) Boateng, A. A.,Mullen, C. A. Fast pyrolysis of biomass thermally pretreated by torrefaction. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis

389

2013, 100, 95-102.

390

(45) Zheng, A., Zhao, Z., Chang, S., Huang, Z., Wang, X., He, F., Li, H. Effect of torrefaction on structure and fast

391

pyrolysis behavior of corncobs. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128, 370-377.

392

(46) Zheng, A., Zhao, Z., Chang, S., Huang, Z., He, F., Li, H. Effect of torrefaction temperature on product distribution

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

17

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

393

from two-staged pyrolysis of biomass. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 2968-2974.

394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

18

Page 18 of 33

Page 19 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

417 418

Table captions

419

Table 1 The basic properties of raw biomasses and the extraction products

420

Table 2 Different types of carbon (ppm) distribution (%) in raw biomasses and Solubles

421

Table 3 The properties of pyrolysis products of raw biomasses and the Solubles

422

Table 4 A brief comparison of the proposed two-stage method with other main bio-oil production/upgrading (direct

biomass

pyrolysis

without

catalyst,4,18,32,33

423

technologies

424

hydrodeoxygenation of bio-oil,37-40 and pyrolysis after torrefaction41-44).

425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

19

catalytic

pyrolysis,34-36

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 33

456 457 458 459 460

Table 1 The basic properties of raw biomasses and the extraction products

Sample

RS

SD

461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493

Ultimate analysis(wt %, db*)

T(oC)

C

H

N

O

RS

44.12

6.05

0.73

Soluble

78.90

6.55

Deposit

74.74

Residue

49.59

SD

a

Proximate analysis(wt %,db*)

Atomic ratio H/C O/C

HHV (MJ/kg)

VM

A

FC

39.12

75.39

9.98

14.63

1.63

0.67

16.59

0.42

14.13

74.06

0.00

25.94

0.99

0.13

35.16

5.39

0.43

19.43

48.37

0.00

51.63

0.86

0.20

32.49

3.79

0.74

11.46

36.89

34.43

28.69

0.91

0.17

20.16

52.46

6.80

0.08

39.43

84.39

1.23

14.37

1.54

0.56

20.43

Soluble

80.32

6.97

1.37

11.34

75.71

0.00

24.29

1.03

0.11

33.58

Deposit

78.98

5.70

1.81

13.51

53.88

0.00

46.12

0.86

0.13

29.54

Residue

73.42

4.75

0.22

13.41

46.31

8.20

45.49

0.77

0.14

29.25

a: by difference *:dry basis VM: volatile matter A: ash FC: fixed carbon

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

20

Page 21 of 33

Energy & Fuels

494

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

495 496 497

Table 2 Different types of carbon (ppm) distribution (%) in raw biomasses and Solubles.

Samples RS RS-Soluble SD SD-Soluble

Carbonyl

Carboxyl

Ar-O

Ar-C

Ar-H

O-alkyl

O-CH3

CH2

CH3

235-187

187-171

171-148

148-129

110-129

110-60

60-50

50-25

25-0

0.0 7.4 0.0 8.1

2.9 2.3 6.9 0.0

1.5 6.2 8.3 0.0

0.0 31.2 3.4 30.8

6.4 11.0 11.0 25.9

75.2 0.0 58.9 0.0

4.9 2.7 4.5 6.8

1.2 13.5 4.3 14.1

7.8 25.9 2.7 14.2

498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

21

Aromaticity 8.0 48.3 22.7 56.7

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

537 538 539 540

Table 3 The properties of pyrolysis products of raw biomasses and the Solubles Sample RS RS-Soluble SD SD- Soluble

541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580

Page 22 of 33

Char Bio-oil Char Bio-oil Char Bio-oil Char Bio-oil

a: by difference

Ultimate analysis(wt %, db*) C H N Oa 56.13 2.35 0.75 11.74 42.19 13.44 1.25 43.12 89.21 3.01 1.96 5.83 87.49 10.51 1.38 0.62 71.67 3.01 0.16 20.06 53.48 11.98 0.08 34.47 72.11 3.76 0.12 24.01 90.09 8.34 0.65 0.92

Ash (wt %, db*) 29.04 0 5.10 0 -

*:dry basis

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

22

Atomic ratio H/C O/C 0.50 0.16 3.80 0.77 0.40 0.05 1.43 0.01 0.50 0.21 2.67 0.48 0.62 0.25 1.10 0.01

HHV (MJ/kg) 20.25 25.87 33.45 44.63 24.95 29.14 25.48 42.32

Page 23 of 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

581 582 583 584 585 586

Table 4 A brief comparison of the proposed two-stage method with other main bio-oil production/upgrading technologies (direct biomass pyrolysis without catalyst,4,18,34,35 catalytic pyrolysis,36-38 hydrodeoxygenation of bio-oil,39-42 and pyrolysis after torrefaction43-46).

Technologies Direct biomass pyrolysis

Two-stage method (RS) Two-stage method (SD)

587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620

Energy & Fuels

Catalytic pyrolysis Hydrodeoxygenation Pyrolysis after torrefaction a: based on dry raw biomass

Mass yielda wt%

Water content wt%

Oxygen content wt%

Carbon-based yielda wt%

HHV, MJ/kg

Energy-y ielda wt%

Catalyst

35-65 11.7 23.7 30-48 12-35 17-50

20-30