Cooperativity in chemical model systems ... - American Chemical Society

Apr 26, 1982 - Cooperativity in Chemical Model Systems: Ligand-Induced Subunit Dimerization. T. G. Traylor,* M. J. Mitchell, J. P. Ciccone, and S. Nel...
0 downloads 0 Views 410KB Size
4986

J. Am. Chem. SOC.1982, 104, 4986-4989

Cooperativity in Chemical Model Systems: Ligand-Induced Subunit Dimerization

Chart I. Protoporphyrin Derivatives" 0

T. G . Traylor,* M. J. Mitchell, J. P. Ciccone, and S.Nelson Department of Chemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093 Received September 23, 1981 Cooperative reactivity in solution is common in biological systems but not in purely chemical systems.l.2 In its simplest form, cooperativity is displayed when multiple identical chemical sites communicate by an allosteric mechanism so that reaction at one of the sites makes the same reaction at a second site more fa~ o r a b l e . ~This process can be accomplished either by ligandinduced aggregation or by ligand-induced conformational change in a preformed aggregate or other multisite system. The few attempts to model allosteric effects with small molecules have dealt with the latter We now describe a class of model metalloporphyrin compounds that display cooperativity through ligand-induced dimerization. The most thoroughly studied cooperative system is hemoglobin, in which four almost identical heme sites react with either dioxygen or carbon monoxide as described above.' Hemoglobin has been treated as a two-state system in which its low-affinity (T-state) form is converted to the high-affinity (R-state) form by a conformational change that occurs as ligands sequentially bind to the hemes.'+ Plots of the fraction of hemoglobin sites occupied (Y) vs. concentration of ligand ([L]) are sigmoid shape as a result of cooperativity. The Hill plot (log ( Y / ( l- Y))vs. log [L]) gives a slope, n, of 2.8 for hemoglobin compared to 1.0 for myoglobin.' The Hill coefficient, n, is commonly used as a test for positive cooperativity ( n > 1). We have modeled this two-state cooperative binding with the protoporphyrin IX derivative 1 (Chart I). In this compound the side chain is too short to bind internally to form chelated heme. In both the Fe"' and Fe" states the affinity of four-coordinated iron porphyrins for the first added ligand is often lower than that for the second. This effect is especially large when the first and second ligands are donor-acceptor pairs such as imidazole, CO (with Fe" porphyrin) or pyridine, CN- (with FelI1 porphyrin). As a result of this effect the side chain base metalloporphyrin 1 (or l'Cl-), which might exist in the four-coordinated state in solution, tends to aggregate or dimerize when a ligand (CO or CN-) is added in order to make the base-Fe bond. This, along with the neighboring group effect, results in the two-state cooperative system described in eq 1-5 (Scheme I). The cyclization (eq 3b) results from the same proximity effect that makes the chelated (long base side chain) hemes assume a five-coordinated structure."-'* The equilibria connecting these species are shown in Scheme 11, where H+ is the form with B protonated. We can write Y, the fraction of total heme in the ligated form, (1) Walsh, C. "Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms";W. H. Freeman: San Francisco, 1979; pp 157-162. (2) Rebek, J., Jr.; Wattley, R. V.; Costello, T.; Gadwood, R.; Marshall, L. J . Am. Chem. SOC.1980, 102,7398-7400. (3) Wyman, J., Jr. Ado. Prot. Chem. 1964, 19,223-286. (4) Rebek, J., Jr.; Wattley, R. V.; Costello, T.; Gadwood, R.; Marshall, L.Angew. Chem., Inf. Ed. Engl. 1981, 20,605-606. The biphenyl bis(crown ether) described in this paper appears to be the only other solution study displaying a Hill coefficient greater than 1 . (5) Lehn, J. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, lZ, 49-57. (6) Traylor, T. G.; Tatsuno, Y.; Powell, D. W.; Cannon, J. B. J. Chem. SOC.,Chem. Commun. 1971, 732-734. (7) Antonini, E.; Brunori, M. 'Hemoglobin and Myoglobin in Their Reactions with Ligands"; Elsevier: New York, 1971; (a) pp 381-414; (b) pp 179-184. (8) Edelstein, S.J. Ann. Reu. Biochem. 1975, 44, 209-232. (9) Perutz, M. F. Ann. Reo. Biochem. 1979, 48,327-386. (10) Compound 1+CI- was prepared by coupling 4-aminopyridine with protohemin chloride monomethyl ester, 3+CI-, by methods previously described.I2 Compound 2+C1- was obtained from a previous study." (11) Traylor, T. G.; Chang, C. K.; Geibel, J.; Berzinis, A,; Mincey, T.; Cannon, J. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1979, 101,6716-6731. (12) Cannon, J.; Geibel, J.; Whipple, M.; Traylor, T. G. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,3395-3396.

0002-7863/82/1504-4986$01.25/0

CH3

CH3

compdb

R

A

1

CH=CH,

OCH,

w