Correction to Emergent Properties of an Organic Semiconductor Driven by its Molecular Chirality Ying Yang, Beth Rice, Xingyuan Shi, Jochen R. Brandt, Rosenildo Correa da Costa, Gordon J. Hedley, Detlef-M. Smilgies, Jarvist M. Frost, Ifor. D. W. Samuel, Alberto Otero-de-la-Roza, Erin R. Johnson, Kim E. Jelfs, Jenny Nelson, Alasdair J. Campbell,* and Matthew J. Fuchter* ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), pp 8329−8338. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03540
T
he total reorganization energy used in the calculation of the charge mobilities was misstated in the original paper: It should be 0.3 eV rather than 0.47 eV. This total reorganization energy consists of an inner reorganization energy of 0.17 eV and an outer reorganization energy of 0.13 eV. Our conclusions remain unchanged because the reorganization energy will only affect the magnitude of the mobility and not the relative values that we are comparing. The locations of incorrectly stated reorganization energies are (1) On page 8334 (right column), the total reorganization energy should be stated as 300 not 470 meV, with inner reorganization energy 0.17 eV and outer reorganization energy 0.13 eV. (2) On page 8336 (right column), it should state that the outer reorganization energy is approximated as 0.13 eV.
Received: May 15, 2018
© XXXX American Chemical Society
A
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b03639 ACS Nano XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX
Additions and Corrections
www.acsnano.org
Cite This: ACS Nano XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX
