Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE
Bioactive Constituents, Metabolites, and Functions
Cottonseed Extracts and Gossypol Regulate Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase Gene Expression in Mouse Macrophages Heping Cao, and Kandan Sethumadhavan J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01240 • Publication Date (Web): 29 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 29, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Cottonseed Extracts and Gossypol Regulate Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase Gene Expression in Mouse Macrophages
Heping Cao*, Kandan Sethumadhavan
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 504-286-4351. Fax: 504-286-4367. E-mail:
[email protected].
Running Title: Cottonseed extracts and gossypol regulate DGAT gene expression
Manuscript Correspondence: Heping Cao, PhD USDA-ARS-SRRC 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd New Orleans, LA 70124 Phone: (504) 286-4351 E-mail:
[email protected] ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 2 of 34
1
ABSTRACT
2
Plant bioactive polyphenols have been used for the prevention and treatment of various diseases
3
since ancient history. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seeds are classified as glanded or glandless
4
depending on the presence or absence of pigment glands, which contain polyphenolic gossypol.
5
Diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGATs) are integral membrane proteins that catalyze the last
6
step of triacylglycerol biosynthesis in eukaryotes. Understanding the regulation of DGATs will
7
provide information for therapeutic intervention for obesity and related diseases. However, little
8
was known if DGAT gene expression was regulated by natural products. The objective of this
9
study was to investigate the effects of cottonseed extracts and gossypol on DGAT gene expression
10
in mouse RAW264.7 macrophages. Mouse cells were treated with different concentrations of
11
cottonseed extracts, gossypol, and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) for various times. Quantitative PCR
12
assay showed that coat extract of glanded seeds had a modest effect on DGAT1 and minimal effect
13
on DGAT2 mRNA levels. Kernel extract of glanded seeds had a minimal effect on DGAT1 but
14
increased DGAT2 mRNA levels more than 20-fold. Coat extract of glandless seeds and LPS had
15
minimal effects on DGAT mRNA levels. Kernel extract of glandless seeds did not have much
16
effect on DGAT1 and slightly increased DGAT2 mRNA levels. Gossypol increased DGAT1 and
17
DGAT2 mRNA levels by up to 3-fold and more than 80-fold, respectively. The coefficient
18
correlation (R2) between DGAT2 mRNA levels and glanded kernel extract and gossypol
19
concentrations were 0.82-0.99. This study suggests that Dgat2 is an inducible gene rapidly
20
responding to stimulators such as polyphenols whose protein product DGAT2 plays an important
21
role in fat biosynthesis. We conclude that gossypol and ethanol extract from glanded cottonseed
22
kernel are strong stimulators of DGAT2 gene expression and that they may be novel agents for
23
intervention of lipid-related dysfunction via increasing DGAT2 gene expression in target tissues.
24 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
25 26
Keywords: Cottonseed extract, diacylglycerol acyltransferase, gene expression, gossypol,
27
lipopolysaccharides, macrophages
28 29 30
INTRODUCTION
31
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plant provides two economically important products: fiber and
32
cottonseed. Cottonseeds account for 20% of the crop value. Cottonseeds are classified as either
33
glanded or glandless seeds depending on the presence or absence of pigment glands, which contain
34
toxic gossypol (Figure 1).1 Glanded cottonseeds are composed of 10% linters, 40% hulls and 50%
35
kernels.2 The kernels contain about 35% oil and 40% protein.3 Commercial cottonseed meal
36
contains approximately 1% gossypol after oil extraction.4 The presence of gossypol limits its use
37
of meals primarily to feed ruminants, which have a relatively high tolerance for the compound.5-7
38
Glandless cottonseeds do not contain pigment glands and have only trace levels of gossypol,
39
making them a good source of protein as a food ingredient or as a feed for non-ruminant
40
animals.8-10 This development has generated considerable interest within the cotton industry.11-13
41
Glanded cottonseeds contain a number of bioactive components, such as gossypol, gallic acid,
42
and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid.14 Gossypol is a well-studied complex polyphenol found in the
43
small intercellular pigment glands in the leaves, stems, roots, and seed of cotton plants (Figure
44
1).15 Gossypol and related compounds have anticancer activities against breast cancer,16 colon
45
cancer,17 pancreatic cancer,18 and prostate cancer.19 It has additional bioactivities such as
46
antiobesity,20 antiinflammatory,21 and antifungal activities.22 Gossypol has also been proposed as
47
an antifertility agent for males.23 These discoveries have created much excitement in biomedical
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 34
48
field and enormous amounts of research have been focused on understanding the medicinal
49
properties of gossypol and related compounds. However, chronic consumption of
50
gossypol-containing cottonseed oil can result in human male infertility.5 Therefore, gossypol is
51
regarded as unsafe for most animals and humans. Significant efforts have been directed at reducing
52
gossypol content in cottonseed by selecting glandless cotton varieties
53
engineering of cotton to provide gossypol-free seeds.11,12
9,10,24
and genetic
54
Minor bioactive components have been studied in glandless cottonseed with flavonol
55
glycosides (flavonoids) being the best-studied. Five flavonoids have been identified in glandless
56
cottonseed.25,26 Seven flavonol glycosides have also been identified from whole cottonseed.14 It
57
was reported that aqueous extracts from glandless cottonseed meal had an antidepressant effect
58
due to the flavonol glycoside, quercetin.26 This compound was shown to have antidepressant
59
effects in pharmacological tests27,28 with potential applications in treating anxiety, depression and
60
Alzeheimer’s disease.29 Independent studies have confirmed that flavonoids could be used as a
61
therapy for depression associated with diabetes30 and under other conditions.31 These studies
62
suggest that bioactive components in glandless cottonseed could be value-added agricultural
63
products in cottonseed with health promotion and disease prevention potentials.
64
Triacylglycerols (TAGs) are the primary form of energy storage in eukaryotes. They also serve
65
as a reservoir of fatty acids for membrane biogenesis of the cells and can lead to obesity when
66
excessively accumulated in adipose tissues.32,33 Diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGATs) esterify
67
sn-1,2-diacylglycerol with a long-chain fatty acyl-CoA and are responsible for the final and
68
rate-limiting step of TAG biosynthesis in eukaryotic organisms.34 It is generally accepted that
69
DGATs are divided into DGAT1 and DGAT2 subfamilies in animals and that additional DGAT3
70
subfamily are present in plants.34-37 Plants and animals deficient in DGATs accumulate less
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
71
TAG.38-40 Animals with reduced DGAT activity are resistant to diet-induced obesity,39,41 lack milk
72
production39 and maybe subject to a congenital diarrheal disorder.42 Over-expression of the DGAT
73
enzymes increases TAG content in plants,43-45 animals46-48 and yeast.49 These genetic studies have
74
demonstrated that DGAT isoforms have non-redundant functions in TAG biosynthesis in species
75
such as mice40 and tung tree.37 Therefore, understanding the regulation of DGATs will help in the
76
development of transgenic plants and microbes with value-added properties and provide
77
information for therapeutic intervention for obesity and related diseases. It is well-known about
78
the number of DGAT isoforms and their expression profiles in some plants and animals, however,
79
little is known if DGAT gene expression is regulated by natural products.34,35
80
Plant flavanol and polyphenol compounds have potential therapeutic benefits. For example,
81
cinnamon polyphenols have been shown to improve lipid profiles of diabetic people.50 We
82
hypothesized that cottonseed may contain novel polypehnol compounds, which may be useful for
83
nutritional and/or medical purposes. The specific objective of this study was to test if extracts from
84
cottonseed have the capability to regulate DGAT gene expression in mammalian cells. We
85
investigated the regulation of DGAT gene expression by ethanol extracts isolated from glanded
86
and glandless cottonseed and compared directly with gossypol and lipopolysaccharides (LPS)
87
using cultured mouse macrophages.
88 89
MATERIALS AND METHODS
90
Cottonseed. Glanded and glandless cottonseeds were collected from variety “DP1321” and
91
“NuMex 15 GLS”, respectively.13 The long fibers in the cotton bolls were separated from the seeds
92
by ginning. The short fibers on the seeds (also called linters) were removed from the seeds with
93
concentrated sulfuric acid (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The seeds were washed with distilled water
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 34
94
extensively followed by neutralizing any residual acid with sodium bicarbonate solution (Sigma).
95
Glanded seeds were smaller than glandless seeds and contained numerous dark-colored
96
gossypol-rich glands in the kernel (see Figure 1A).
97
Cottonseed Extracts. Ethanol extracts were isolated from the coat and kernel of glanded and
98
glandless cottonseeds according to a protocol for enriching polyphenolic compounds from
99
cinnamon bark.51,52 The protocol consisted of three steps for seed kernel extraction (fractionation,
100
defatting, and ethanol extraction) and four steps for seed coat extraction (fractionation, defatting,
101
acetic acid extraction, and ethanol extraction). Briefly, glanded and glandless cottonseeds were
102
fractionated into seed coat and kernel by dry grinding and then in a homogenization buffer (50 mM
103
Tris-HCl and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). The kernel fractions were defatted by stirring in an equal
104
volume of chloroform (Sigma) followed by centrifugation.14 An equal volume of hexane (Sigma)
105
was added to the upper (aqueous) layer of chloroform extraction followed by mixing and
106
centrifugation. The lower (aqueous) layer of hexane extraction was used for ethanol extraction.
107
The seed coat fraction was suspended in acetic acid (Sigma), autoclaved and centrifuged before
108
ethanol extraction.52 Four volumes of ethanol (Sigma) were added to the kernel and coat fractions
109
followed by centrifugation and drying under rotoevaporation (Integrated SpeedVac System,
110
Thermo Fisher) until all ethanol was evaporated. The seed kernel extract was much darker in color
111
than the seed coat extract (see Figure 1B).
112
Cell Culture. Mouse RAW264.7 macrophages were purchased from American Type Culture
113
Collection (Manassas, VA). The basic cell culture protocol followed previous procedures using a
114
water jacket CO2 incubator (Forma Series II, Model 3100 Series, Thermo Fisher) and in a Logic+
115
A2 hood (Labconco, Kansas City, MO).52,53 Mouse RAW264.7 macrophages were maintained as
116
described54 in 75 cm2 polystyrene tissue culture flasks at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
117
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 4.5 mg/ml (25 mM) glucose supplemented with
118
10% (v:v) fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM
119
L-glutamine (Gibco BRL, Thermo Fisher). RAW macrophages were mechanically dissociated
120
from the T-75 flask with a cell scraper, stained with equal volume of 0.4% trypsin blue dye before
121
counting the number of live cells with a TC20 Automatic Cell Counter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
122
RAW macrophages were routinely observed before and during treatment with a Zoe Florescent
123
Cell Imager (Bio-Rad).
124
Chemical Treatment. Mouse RAW264.7 macrophages were sub-cultured at approximately 1
125
x 105 cells/ml density in 24-well tissue culture plates (CytoOne, USA Scientific, Ocala, FL) (0.5
126
ml/well). These cells were treated with 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 100 µg/ml of ethanol extracts
127
from cottonseed, 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µg/ml of gossypol (Sigma), and 0, 10, 20, 50, 100,
128
500, and 1000 ng/ml of LPS (Sigma). The treatments lasted for 2 h, 8 h and 24 h (“0” treatment
129
corresponding to 1% DMSO) in the culture medium, the same DMSO concentration used to
130
suspend the chemicals followed by RNA extraction.
131
RNA Extraction. Mouse cells in 24-well plates were washed twice with 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl
132
and lysed directly with 1 ml of TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen). RNA was isolated according to the
133
manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations and integrity were determined using RNA 6000
134
Nano Assay Kit and the Bioanalyzer 2100 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent
135
Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with RNA 6000 Ladder as the standard (Ambion, Inc., Austin,
136
TX, USA)55. RNA concentrations were also quantified with an Implen NanoPhotometer
137
(Munchen, Germany).
138
Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis. The basic procedure of SYBR Green qPCR assay
139
was according to the MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 34
140
real-time PCR experiments.56 PCR primers and TaqMan probes (Biosearch Technologies, Inc.,
141
Petaluma, CA) were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City,
142
CA). The Tms of the primers were variable to a few degrees but the Tms for the probes were
143
generally 10 degrees higher than the corresponding primers. The amplicon sizes and the nucleotide
144
sequences (5' to 3') of the forward primers, TaqMan probes (TET – BHQ1) and reverse primers,
145
respectively, are described in Table 1. The cDNAs were synthesized from total RNA using
146
SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). The cDNA synthesis mixture (20 µl)
147
contained 2.5 µg total RNA, 2.4 µg oligo(dT)12-18 primer, 0.1 µg random primers, 500 µM dNTPs,
148
10 mM DTT, 40 units RNaseOUT and 200 units SuperScript II reverse transcriptase in 1X
149
first-strand synthesis buffer (Life Technologies). The cDNA synthesis reactions were incubated at
150
42°C for 50 min. The cDNA samples were stored in -80°C freezer and diluted with water to 1
151
ng/µl before qPCR analyses.
152
SYBR Green qPCR reaction mixtures contained 5 ng of total RNA-derived cDNAs, forward
153
primer, reverse primer and 1X iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
154
The thermal cycle conditions were as follows: 3 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 10
155
s, 65°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. The qPCR reactions were performed in 96-well clear plates
156
sealed by adhesives with a CFX96 real-time system-C1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad
157
Laboratories).
158
Data Analysis. The ∆∆CT method of relative quantification was used to determine the fold
159
change in gene expression (refer to Table 2 as an example of calculation).57 First, the cycle of
160
threshold (CT) was obtained from three independent samples. Second, the first delta CT value
161
(∆CT) was obtained by subtracting the CT values of the internal reference control, mouse 60S
162
ribosome protein 32 (Rpl32) from the CT values of the target mRNA (∆CT = CTTarget - CTref). Third,
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
163
the second delta CT value (∆∆CT) was obtained by subtracting the ∆CT of the calibrator (DMSO
164
control) from the ∆CT of the target mRNAs (∆∆CT= ∆CTTarget - ∆CTcal). Finally, the fold change in
165
expression was obtained using the equation 2-∆∆CT.
166
Statistics.
The data in the figures represent the mean and standard deviation of three
167
independent samples. They were analyzed by statistical analysis using ANOVA with SigmaStat
168
3.1 software (Systat Software). Multiple comparisons among the treatments with different time or
169
concentrations
170
Student-Newman-Keuls Method.52 Different lower case letters displayed above each of the
171
treatment concentration on the figures are significantly different between the treatment times at p