Cu-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative N–N Coupling of Carbazoles and

37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60 .... phen (20). Cu(OAc)2•H2O (20). 18. 2. 1. 2. CuBr2...
1 downloads 0 Views 754KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE

Communication

Cu-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative N–N Coupling of Carbazoles and Diarylamines Including Selective Cross-Coupling Michael Ryan, Joseph R Martinelli, and Shannon S. Stahl J. Am. Chem. Soc., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b05245 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 10, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cu-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative N–N Coupling of Carbazoles and Diarylamines Including Selective Cross-Coupling Michael C. Ryan,† Joseph R. Martinelli,‡ and Shannon S. Stahl*,† †

Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1101 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States ‡ Small Molecule Design and Development, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, United States Supporting Information Placeholder ABSTRACT: A Cu-catalyzed method has been identified

for aerobic oxidative dimerization of carbazoles and diarylamines to the corresponding N–N coupled bicarbazoles and tetraarylhydrazines. The reactions proceed under mild conditions (1 atm O2, 60–80 °C) with a catalyst composed of CuBr·dimethylsulfide and N,N-dimethylaminopyridine. Reactions between carbazole and diarylamines show unusually selective cross-coupling, even with a 1:1 ratio of the two substrates. This behavior was found to arise from reversible formation of the tetraarylhydrazine. Formation of this species is kinetically favored, but cleavage of the N–N bond under the reaction conditions leads to selective formation of the thermodynamically favored cross-coupling product. Nitrogen-nitrogen bonds are prevalent in natural products,1 pharmaceuticals,2 and organic materials3 (Scheme 1A). Various methods are available to prepare these bonds, with classical methods including diazotization of anilines with sodium nitrite and a Brønsted acid, and the use of Nchlorinated reagents or related electrophilic nitrogen species.4 Amidst growing interest in "green" oxidation methods for organic synthesis, catalytic methods have been identified for N–N coupling that are capable of using O2 as the terminal oxidant.5 Recent examples include intramolecular reactions for the formation of pyrazoles and related heterocycles5d,g and Au- and Cu-catalyzed methods for aerobic oxidative coupling of anilines to azo compounds.5b,e These precedents and our interest in Cucatalyzed aerobic oxidation reactions6,7 prompted us to consider intermolecular N–N coupling reactions of Nsubstituted anilines, including carbazoles. Homodimeric 9,9'-bicarbazoles, such as Dixiamycin B8 (cf. Scheme 1A), are found in nature and are also of interest in materials chemistry.9 Previously reported methods for the preparation of these compounds feature stoichiometric oxidants, such as KMnO4,10 Ag2O,11 or dichromate,12 in addition to a recent electrolysis method.13 Here, we report a Cu-catalyzed aerobic oxidation method to access these molecules, as well as tetraarylhydrazines derived from diarylamines. Reactions between carbazole and diarylamine substrates undergo selective cross-coupling to afford unsymmetrical

tetrasubstituted hydrazines (i.e., carbazole-diarylamines in Scheme 1B) in preference to the homocoupled dimers. The origin of this unusual selectivity is elucidated. Scheme 1. A) N–N bonds found naturally and synthetically B) Intermolecular cross-coupling of nitrogen atoms. A) Important Examples of Compounds with N–N Bonds Natural Products

Pharmaceuticals

Materials and Dyes

HO Me HO2C H

F3C

N N

Me Dixiamycin B Antibacterial activity

H

N

NO2

O NH 2 S O

Me N

N N

Me

PhHN

CO2H Me Disperse Orange 1 azo dye

Celecoxib NSAID

OH

B) Utilization of Carbazoles and Diarylamines in Oxidative N–N bond Formation cat. [Cu], O2 N H

N–N bond formation

N N

N N

9,9'-Bicarbazoles

CarbazoleDiarylamines

N N

Tetraarylhydrazines

We began our studies by using 3,6-di(tert-butyl)carbazole 1a as a model substrate, and a summary of results obtained from reactions performed with 20 mol% of a copper salt in combination with an ancillary ligand are provided in Table 1. Copper(II) salts were ineffective precatalysts (Table 1, entries 1 and 2), but moderate yields of 9,9'-bicarbazole 2a were obtained when CuCl or CuBr was used in combination with 1,10-phenanthroline (entries 3 and 4). Use of CuBr·DMS instead of CuBr led to further improvement (entry 5). Assessment of other bidentate ligands revealed improved results with 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy; cf. entries 5-7), but two equivalents of an electron- rich monodentate ligand proved even more effective (entries 811), with the best results obtained with N,Ndimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) and N-methylimidazole (NMI) (entries 10 and 11). Further optimization of the CuBr·DMS/DMAP catalyst system led to formation of bicarbazole 2a in 85% yield (70% isolated; cf. entry 12), with 10 mol% Cu loading at 60 °C. Good yields were also

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

observed in other solvents, including 1,2-dichloroethane (78%, entry 13) (see Supporting Information for full screening data). Table 1. Optimization of carbazole dimerization. t-Bu

t-Bu

t-Bu NH

X mol% [Cu], Y mol% Ligand

N N

DMF (0.2 M), O2 (1 atm), 80 ºC, 6 h

t-Bu

t-Bu

t-Bu 1a

2a Ligand a (mol%)

Conversion (%) b Yield (%) b

entry

Cu Source (mol%)

1

Cu(OAc)2•H 2O (20)

phen (20)

18

2

2

CuBr2 (20)

phen (20)

2

0 26

3

CuCl (20)

phen (20)

76

4

CuBr (20)

phen (20)

70

39

5

CuBr•DMS (20)

phen (20)

64

43

6

CuBr•DMS (20)

TMEDA (20)

63

38

7

CuBr•DMS (20)

bpy (20)

66

50

8 9

CuBr•DMS (20) CuBr•DMS (20)

pyridine (40) 4-methoxypyridine (40)

41 44

18 33

10

CuBr•DMS (20)

DMAP (40)

87

72

11

CuBr•DMS (20)

NMI (40)

88

71

12c 13 c,d

CuBr•DMS (10) CuBr•DMS (10)

DMAP (20) DMAP (20)

94 100

85 (70) 78

Page 2 of 5

and oxidative coupling of bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)amine to 2k was conducted on 1 g scale without impact on the isolated yield (98%). Good yields were observed with a number of the other substrates, including those with electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents (cf. 2j, 2k and 2n, 2o, 2p, respectively), and the reactions were less affected by the lack of an aryl substituent para to the nitrogen atom (cf. 2i, 2l, 2m). The unsymmetrical diarylamine, 1q, required elevated temperature (60 °C) to reach completion. Table 2. Substrate scope of carbazole and diarylamine dimerization. a

Numbers below refer to isolated yields. b 20 mol% CuBr·DMS, 40 mol% DMAP, DCE, 60 ºC c 10 mol% CuBr·DMS, 20 mol% DMAP, DCM, r.t. d R

R 10-20 mol% CuBr•DMS, 20-40 mol% DMAP,

N H

N N

DCM or DCE, O2 (1 atm), r.t. or 60 ºC, 17 h

2a-qa

1a-q B. Diarylamine c Me

A. Carbazoleb t-Bu

R

Cl

Br

N

N 2

N

N 2

2

t-Bu

N

2

N

2

2

a

phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, TMEDA = tetramethylethylenediamine, bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, DMAP = 4-dimethylaminopyridine, NMI = Nmethylimidazole. b Conversion and yield determined by 1H NMR integration, using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard. Isolated yield in parentheses. c Performed at 60 ºC for 17 h. d Performed in DCE.

Application of these catalytic conditions to other substrates showed that good yields of bicarbazoles could be obtained from carbazoles bearing both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups in the 3- and 6-positions (i.e., para to the nitrogen atom of the carbazole; cf. 2b-f, Table 2A). 1,2-Dichloroethane proved to be the most effective solvent in these cases. Substrates lacking substitution in one or both of the 3- and 6-positions are susceptible to side reactions leading to C–N and C–C-coupled carbazole dimers and oligomers.14 For example, the parent bicarbazole was obtained in < 30% yield (See Supporting Information, Table S7). Even in these cases, however, the desired N–N-coupled bicarbazoles could be readily isolated from side products, and products 2g and 2h were obtained in moderate yields (35% and 54%, respectively). The latter compound is noteworthy because it represents a structural analog of Dixiamycin B (cf. Scheme 1). The recently reported synthesis of this natural product by Baran and coworkers provides important context for the challenge associated with this type of N–N coupling.13 In general, aerobic oxidative dimerization of diarylamines proved to proceed under milder conditions and afford higher yields than the reactions of carbazoles (Table 2B). Precedents for this reaction are limited. Kajimoto et al. showed that N–N coupling of the parent diphenylamine could be achieved under aerobic conditions with stoichiometric CuCl,15 and Knölker recently described an Fe(phthalocyanin) catalyst for aerobic oxidative N–N coupling of diarylamines.5h,16,17 The present reactions were conducted at room temperature in DCM with 10 mol% CuBr·DMS and 20 mol% DMAP. Several substrates underwent conversion to the corresponding tetrarylhydrazine in near-quantitative yield (cf. 2j, 2k, 2p),

t-Bu

Cl

Br

2a 74%d,e I

t-Bu

Me

2c 69%f

2b 72%

2j 99%

2i 63%

2k 98% Br

MeO

Ph N

N

N

N

2

2

2

N

2

N

2

2

Me I

MeO

Ph

2e 79%

2d 63%

Me

Me

2f 69%g

MeO 2m 76% Br

2l 89% F

N

Me 2n 84% Me

N

2

2

N

N

2

N

2

2

Br

2g 35%

2h 54%

F

2o 81%

Br

2p 99%e

EtO2C

2q 69%h

10 mol% CuBr·DMS, 20 mol% DMAP, DMF, 60 ºC. e Average isolated yield over three runs. f 80 ºC. g 10 mol% CuBr·DMS, 20 mol% DMAP. h 60 ºC, DCE.

After demonstrating these homocoupling reactions, we evaluated prospects for cross-coupling. N–N cross-coupling reactions are rare, with precedents typically requiring use of one of the reaction partners in large excess to achieve formation of the desired product.5e A reaction of carbazole 1a and diarylamine 1p was tested in 1:1 stoichiometry under standard conditions (eq 1). A 72% yield of the cross-coupled product 3a was observed, with a 10% yield of each homocoupled dimer. Use of a small excess of the carbazole (1a:1p = 1.5:1) led to formation of the cross-coupled product in 86% yield. In both cases, the cross-coupling selectivity far exceeds that expected from statistical product ratios. Br

t-Bu

10 mol% CuBr•DMS, 20 mol% DMAP DCE, O2 (1 atm) 60 ºC, 17 h

NH + HN t-Bu

1a

1p

Br

Br

t-Bu N N

(1)

t-Bu

Br 3a 1a:1p = 1:1, 72% (NMR) 1a:1p = 1.5:1, 86% (NMR)

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Due to the paucity of synthetic methods available to create N–N cross-coupled products,18 we explored the substrate scope of this reaction (Table 3). A 1.5:1 ratio of substrates was used to facilitate purification of the crosscoupled product. For example, product 3a was obtained in a 69% isolated yield when using a 1:1.5 ratio of 1a:1p. The parent carbazole was a poor substrate for oxidative homocoupling (see above), but it performed well as a crosscoupling partner, affording 3b and 3l in 64% and 62% yield, respectively. Product 3b could be isolated in an improved 77% yield when the reaction was performed on a larger scale (1 g, 6 mmol carbazole). Both electron-rich and electrondeficient carbazoles were effective with bis(4bromophenyl)amine 1p as the coupling partner (cf. 3c–3f). Halogen substituents are well-tolerated on both coupling partners (3a–3k), and the unsymmetrical diarylamine 1n was an excellent cross-coupling partner, affording 3g and 3h in a 75% and 61% yields, respectively. Table 3. Cross-coupling of carbazoles and diarylamines. R

R NH +

10 mol% CuBr•DMS, 20 mol% DMAP DCE, O2 (1 atm), 60 ºC, 17 h

Br

Br

Br

Br

Br

3a 69%b,c ,72% b,c,d Br

3b 64%c,e,77%c,f

Br

t-Bu

t-Bu

Br

4a

Me

t-Bu

Br 3j 61%

Br

N N F

Me

t-Bu

Br

t-Bu

N N

t-Bu 3k 80%

Me

3h 61%c

N N

t-Bu

Br

F

Me

3g 75%c

N N

t-Bu 3i 59%

N N

Br

Br

N N Cl

Br

3a

3d 67%c Br

t-Bu

3f 46% t-Bu

MeO

3c 62%g

N N

3e 55% Cl

t-Bu

N N

Br

Br

Br

N N

Br

Br

1p

N N

Br

MeO

N N

N N

t-Bu

Cl

t-Bu 1a (carbazole) or 1k (diarylamine)

or

N N

Br

3a-ja

N N

Cl

cat. Cu/O2

NH + HN

t-Bu

Br

t-Bu

N N

(1.5 equiv) t-Bu

Br

t-Bu

R

R

HN

relatively insensitive to the ratio of the coupling partners (Figure 1, red trace), showing significantly greater-thanstatistical selectivity for cross-coupling under conditions with a 1:1 substrate ratio (73% yield of 3a; the dashed line in Figure 1 shows the yield expected from a statistical ratio of products). Only a small excess of either substrate was needed to observe 80–90% yield of the cross-coupled product. The reaction of two different diarylamines also achieved greater-than-statistical selectivity (Figure 1, blue trace), albeit not as high as that observed in the carbazole/diarylamine coupling reaction (56% yield of 4a at 1:1 ratio). Excellent yields of the tetraarylhydrazine crosscoupling product were obtained when excess of either partner was used (i.e., at 1:5 or 5:1 ratio).

t-Bu 3l 62%

a Isolated yields. b 20 mol% CuBr·DMS, 40 mol% DMAP. c 1.5 equiv diarylamine. d Reaction performed in air. e Average isolated yield over three runs. f Isolated yield, 1 g (6 mmol) carbazole scale. g 0.1 mmol scale.

The selectivity observed in the carbazole/diarylamine cross-coupling reactions is generally better than that observed from the cross-coupling of two different diarylamines (Figure 1), and much higher than that observed in previously reported reactions of primary anilines.5e The latter reactions required a 5:1 ratio of aniline substrates to obtain moderate-to-good yields (42–73%) of cross-coupled azo compounds, ArN=NAr'. More systematic assessment of the different selectivities observed in the present crosscoupling reactions was probed by varying substrate ratios from 5:1 to 1:5 in each case (Figure 1).19 In the reaction of carbazole 1a with diarylamine 1p, the yield of 3a was

Figure 1. Dependence of cross-coupling yield on substrate stoichiometry. 1H NMR yields, average of three runs. Conditions: (3a) 10 mol% CuBr·DMS, 20 mol% DMAP, DCE, O2 (1 atm) 60 ºC, 17 h; (4a) 10 mol% CuBr·DMS 20 mol% DMAP, DCM, O2 (1 atm) r.t., 17 h.

In order to gain further insight into the origin of the selectivity for 3a in Figure 1, we analyzed a time course for the reaction between 1a and 1p by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2). The diarylamine 1p is consumed rapidly, generating the homocoupled tetraarylhydrazine 2p. Initial formation of 2p is consistent with the milder reaction conditions observed with diarylamines relative to carbazoles (cf. Table 2). The tetraarylhydrazine 2p reaches a maximum concentration at ~40 minutes and then disappears with concomitant formation of the cross-coupling product 3a. This observation indicates that formation of the N–N bond in 2p is reversible under the reaction conditions, and 2p is consumed by irreversible formation of the cross-coupled product 3a. Control experiments reveal that N–N cleavage in 2p is not promoted by copper and that N–N bond formation in 3a is irreversible under the reaction conditions (Figure S6). The N–N bond in tetraarylhydrazines is quite weak (e.g., BDE = 23.5 kcal/mol for Ph2N–NPh220), and homolytic cleavage of the tetraarylhydrazine N–N bond will generate aminyl radicals21 capable of undergoing crosscoupling with the carbazole coupling partner. Irrespective of

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

mechanism, the observations show that preferential formation of the cross-coupled product 3a over 2p is thermodyanamically controlled. The cross-coupling selectivity for 4a obtained from the reaction of 1k and 1p reflects an equilibrium preference for formation of the crosscoupled over the homocoupled tetraarylhydrazines.22 Br

t-Bu NH + HN t-Bu

1a (1 equiv)

Br 1p (1 equiv)

Br

t-Bu

10 mol% CuBr•DMS, 20 mol% DMAP

t-Bu N N

DCE, O2 (1 atm), 60 ºC, 3 h t-Bu

3a

N

Br

t-Bu

2

2a

Br

Br

In conclusion, we have developed the first catalytic method for aerobic N–N coupling of carbazoles to 9,9´bicarbazoles, and showed that similar conditions may be used for the coupling of diarylamines. Moreover, we have identified selective cross-coupling reactions of carbazoles and diarylamines, wherein the selectivity arises from reversible cleavage of the N–N bond in kinetically favored tetraarylhydrazine intermediates, ultimately generating the more stable carbazole-diarylamine products. The latter compounds have little precedent and warrant attention in medicinal and materials applications.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Experimental Procedures and compound characterization data (PDF)

N N

Br

Br

Page 4 of 5

2p

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author

*[email protected] Notes The authors declare no competing financial interests.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Figure 2. 1H NMR time course of the cross-coupling of carbazole 1a and diarylamine 1p.

We would like to thank Eli Lilly and Company for funding through the Lilly Research Award Program (LRAP). We also thank the DOE (DE-FG02-05ER15690) for funding. Spectroscopic instrumentation was partially supported by the NIH (1S10 OD020022) and the NSF (CHE-1048642).

REFERENCES 1. Blair, L. M.; Sperry, J., J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 794. 2. (a) Zhou, C.-H.; Wang. Y., Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 239. (b) Küçükgüzel, Ş. G.; Şenkardeş, S., Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 786. 3. (a) Jain, S. R.; Sridhara, K.; Thangamathesvaran, P. M. Prog. Poly. Sci. 1993, 18, 997. (b) Merino, E., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3835. 4. (a) Cahn, J. W.; Powell, R. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 2565. (b) Li, G.; Nelsen, S. F.; Jalilov, A. S.; Guzei, I. A., J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2445. 5. (a) Hayashi, H.; Kainoh, A.; Katayama, M.; Kawasaki, K.; Okazaki, T., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1976, 15, 299. (b) Grirrane, A.; Corma, A.; García, H., Science 2008, 322, 1661. (c) Lu, W.; Xi, C., Tet. Lett. 2008, 49, 4011. (d) Ueda, S.; Nagasawa, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15080. (e) Zhang, C.; Jiao, N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6174. (f) Yan, X.-M.; Chen, Z.-M.; Yang, F.; Huang, Z.-Z., Synlett 2011, 2011, 569. (g) Chen, C.; Tang, G.; He, F.; Wang, Z.; Jing, H.; Faessler, R., Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1690. (h) Fritsche, R. F.; Theumer, G.; Kataeva, O.; Knölker, H.-J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 549. 6. (a) Wendlandt, A. E.; Suess, A. M.; Stahl, S. S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11062. (b) Ryland, B. L.; Stahl, S. S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 8824. (c) McCann, S. D.; Stahl, S. S., Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1756. 7. For a comprehensive review: Allen, S. E.; Walvoord, R. R.; PadillaSalinas, R.; Kozlowski, M. C. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6234. 8. Zhang, Q.; Mándi, A.; Li, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.; Tian, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, S.; Ju, J.; Kurtán, T.; Zhang, C., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 5256. 9. (a) Pandit, P.; Yamamoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nishimura, K.; Kurashige, Y.; Yanai, T.; Nakamura, G.; Masaoka, S.; Furukawa, K.; Yakiyama, Y.; Kawano, M.; Higashibayashi, S., Chem. Sci. 2015, 6,

4160. (b) Yuan, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, L.; Chen, Y. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 4993. 10. Perkin, W. H.; Tucker, S. H., J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 1921, 119, 216. 11. Branch, G. E. K.; Smith, J. F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1920, 42, 2405. 12. McLintock, J.; Horwood Tucker, S., J. Chem. Soc. 1927, 1214. 13. Rosen, B. R.; Werner, E. W.; O’Brien, A. G.; Baran, P. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5571. 14. Baran and coworkers have observed similar products from the electrochemical oxidative dimerization of carbazoles, originating from unselective coupling of a carbazolyl radical intermediate (See ref. 13). 15. Kajimoto, T.; Takahashi, H.; Tsuji, J., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 3673. 16 . Cu-catalyzed methods using oxidants other than O2: (a) Zhu, Y.; Shi, Y., Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1942. (b) Reddy, C. B. R.; Reddy, S. R.; Naidu, S., Catal. Commun. 2014, 56, 50. 17 . Non-catalytic methods: (a) Naimi-Jamal, M. R.; Hamzeali, H.; Mokhtari, J.; Boy, J.; Kaupp, G., ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 83. (b) Zhang, L.; Xia, J.; Li, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, S., Organometallics 2011, 30, 375. 18. (a) Benati, L.; Placucci, G.; Spagnolo, P.; Tundo, A.; Zanardi, G., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 1684. (b) Benati, L.; Spagnolo, P.; Tundo, A.; Zanardi, G., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 1536. 19. Cross-coupling between two differently-substituted carbazoles 1a and 1c was also attempted, but formation of considerable amounts of side products complicated analysis. 20. (a) Franzen, V., Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1957, 604, 251. (b) Cain, C. K.; Wiselogle, F. Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 1163.

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of the American Chemical Society 22. See Section IX in the Supporting Information for equilibration studies. 21. Evidence for N-centered radical formation under catalytic reaction conditions has been confirmed by EPR spectroscopy. See section X in the Supporting Information.

TOC Graphic cat. Cu/O2 NH

+

HN

Selective Cross-Coupling

N N

Kinetically Facile and Reversible

cat. Cu/O2

N N

N N

carbazole homocoupling

diarylamine homocoupling

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment