CuO and ZnO Nanoparticles Modify Interkingdom Cell Signaling

May 8, 2017 - As the world population increases, strategies for sustainable agriculture are needed to fulfill the global need for plants for food and ...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

Review

CuO and ZnO Nanoparticles Modify Interkingdom Cell Signaling Processes Relevant to Crop Production: A Review. Anne Anderson, Joan E. McLean, Astrid Rosa Jacobson, and David Britt J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 08 May 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 11, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

CuO and ZnO Nanoparticles Modify Interkingdom Cell Signaling Processes Relevant to Crop Production: A Review *

Anne J Anderson1, Joan E McLean2, Astrid R Jacobson3, David W Britt4.

1 Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322- 5305 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 -8200 USA 3 Department of Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 USA 4 Department of Bioengineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-4105 USA *Corresponding author [email protected]

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 48

1

ABSTRACT: As the world population increases, strategies for sustainable agriculture

2

are needed to fulfill the global need for plants for food and other commercial products.

3

Nanoparticle formulations are likely to be part of the developing strategies. CuO and

4

ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) offer potential as fertilizers, as they provide bioavailable

5

essential metals, and as pesticides, because of dose-dependent toxicity. Effects of

6

these metal oxide NPs on rhizosphere functions are the focus of this review. These NPs

7

at doses of 10 mg metal/kg and above change production of key metabolites involved in

8

plant protection in a root-associated microbe, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6. Altered

9

synthesis occurs in the microbe for phenazines, which function in plant resistance to

10

pathogens, the pyoverdine-like siderophore that enhance Fe bioavailability in the

11

rhizosphere and indole-3-acetic acid affecting plant growth. In wheat seedlings,

12

reprograming of root morphology involves increases in root hair proliferation (CuO NPs)

13

and lateral root formation (ZnO NPs). Systemic changes in wheat shoot gene

14

expression point to altered regulation for metal stress resilience as well as the potential

15

for enhanced survival under stress commonly encountered in the field. These

16

responses to the NPs cross kingdoms involving the bacteria, fungi and plants in the

17

rhizosphere. Our challenge is to learn how to understand the value of these potential

18

changes and successfully formulate the NPs for optimal activity in the rhizosphere of

19

crop plants. These formulations may be integrated into developing practices to ensure

20

sustainability of crop production.

21

KEY WORDS: root microbiome, metabolites, acyl homoserine lactones, siderophore,

22

phenazine, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6, indole-3-acetic acid, drought stress

23 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 48

24

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1. INTRODUCTION

25

1.1.

26

This review focuses on the impact of nanoproducts on key processes in the plant’s

27

rhizosphere affecting plant health. The effects are observed both on the plant, and a

28

common type of bacterium that colonizes the root surface. Basic laboratory studies at

29

the cellular, biochemical and transcriptome levels show that CuO and ZnO NPs have an

30

impact on metabolites acting as signals in the communication between the plant and the

31

bacterial cells for functions in the rhizosphere. The work illustrates the need in the

32

development of nanoproducts for agriculture to consider not only plant responses to

33

NPs, but, also the essential role played by the plant’s microbiome in plant productivity.

34

1.2.

35

The overview of the review.

Potential uses of metal oxide NPs in agriculture. Nanosized materials will be engineered and formulated for agricultural use,

36

although currently commercialization is in its infancy. Yield and quality of crops are

37

being challenged by the growing human population, shrinking prime agricultural land

38

and irrigation water, and weather instability. Additionally, there are problems associated

39

with accumulation and run off from applications of the conventional commercial

40

pesticides used in agriculture, industry and domestic settings. Many of the filed patents

41

feature modification to nanosize particles of materials with proven efficacy as bulk

42

products as fertilizers or pesticides. Nanomaterials also offer potential as delivery

43

vehicles and as sensors for key processes in crop production.1-6 Entry of NPs into

44

agricultural soils could also occur from purposely- applied sludges, or by accident, such

45

as agricultural use of polluted water.7,8 A recent review indicated that sludge contained

46

“vast stores of metal-containing nanoparticles”.8 Additionally, trophic transfer of NPs

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 48

47

through natural food chains demonstrates that their applications to soils and plant

48

extends exposure to multiple organisms from different kingdoms.9-11 As with

49

applications of all chemicals in agriculture, a balance must be obtained between positive

50

and negative consequences for the nanoagricultural formulations. Aspects of potential

51

risks of the application of nanoproducts are extensively reviewed.12-16

52

NPs containing essential metals, such as Fe, Mg, Zn, Cu and Mn, are proposed

53

as fertilizers at low doses and as pesticides at higher doses 17-20 because these metals

54

are vital for cellular function yet toxic above a threshold.21,22 Fertilization is important for

55

soils where the bioavailability of essential metals is limited. Restricted availability could

56

be due to lack of metal-containing minerals or the removal of the metal resources

57

through continuous cropping of the soil. Also the metals could be present but held in the

58

soil in nonbioavailable forms as minerals or with organic matter .23 Worldwide there are

59

many soils producing plants deficient in Zn, leading to low Zn nutrition when they are

60

used as foods.24-26 Zn deficiency is present in 30 % of the world’s population and

61

impairs growth, reproduction, nervous system development and the immune

62

system.25.26 Cu-deficient soils occur less frequently worldwide but are present 27in part

63

due to low bioavailability because of mineral complexation23 and the strong association

64

of Cu with organic matter.28,29 Symptoms of Cu stress occur on plants grown on the

65

deficient soils such as wither tip of cereals.27

66

The potential use as fertilizers for metal oxide NPs stems from increased metal

67

accumulation in plants grown with the NPs in different matrices, including field soils 30-33

68

(Fig. 1). Metal accumulations due to growth with ZnO and CuO NPs, uptake is due to

69

both the plant responds to the NPs and the metal released by dissolution in the 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

70

rhizosphere or in planta. Uptake of intact NPs into plants is observed, but with high

71

variability between plant species. For instance, no ZnO NPs are detected in cells of

72

soybean roots,34 whereas aggregates of ZnO NPs are detected in maize xylem.35 CuO

73

NPs applications to maize roots result in transport of the NPs up into the leaves and

74

then redistribution back to the roots.36 Translocation of NPs into shoots also occurs in

75

rice grown with CuO NPs, although the Casparian strip acts as a physical barrier.32

76

Although magnetite NPs are not transported into wheat shoots,37 uptake and transport

77

of iron oxide NPs occurs in pumpkin.38 Intracellular trafficking also is reported. ZnO NPs

78

are internalized by root cells of a wetland plant39 and TiO2 NPs enter maize root cells.40

79

The degree of bioaccumulation of metal from CuO NPs is influenced by other factors

80

such as weathering of the NPs.41 These variabilities illustrate the complexity of

81

predicting the efficacy of the NPs in agricultural settings that are discussed in more

82

detail in this review.

83

At higher doses than those suitable for plant fertilization, toxic effects of Zn and

84

Cu on cellular functions raise the possibility of their use as pesticides where pathogenic

85

fungi and bacteria could be targeted. For instance inhibited growth of plant pathogenic

86

fungi and oomycetes is demonstrated with dose dependent effects (e.g. >100 mg

87

metal/L).42-46 Early and current work assessing toxic effects of NPs on bacteria focus on

88

their potential as an alternative control strategy for human pathogenic bacteria, a

89

strategy needed because of the development of resistance to traditional antibiotics.47

90

Initial responses in cell toxicity may involve binding to cell walls.48 Changes to

91

membrane potentials 49 and disturbance of the redox balance within a cell contribute to

92

toxicity. The ability of the Cu ion to exist in two redox states catalyzes formation of

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 48

93

superoxide anion due to reduction of molecular oxygen. Also both Zn and Cu interact

94

with -SH groups, such as those found in proteins and a key intracellular antioxidant,

95

glutathione. Inactivation of enzyme activity and depletion of glutathione contribute to

96

cellular stress from accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS).50,51 Indeed in a review

97

of the impact of metal oxide NPs on plants focusses on detoxification of ROS as an

98

important survival mechanism.13

99

The positive value of nanoparticles (NPs) in agriculture is tempered by the need

100

to predict negative effects, such as phytotoxicity and deleterious effects on essential soil

101

microbe functions.12,16 Understanding at the molecular level, the basics involved in

102

variability between responses with different NPs and plants and soils plus their

103

microbiomes (Fig. 2) will promote confident use of nanoagricultural products. However,

104

currently such studies at these levels are limited.52

105

This review addresses, in a model system, cellular, biochemical and

106

transcriptome changes induced through the presence of CuO and ZnO NPs in the

107

rhizosphere on both the plant and root-colonizing bacterial cells. The work described

108

has been performed under defined laboratory conditions in shake and agar plate culture

109

for the microbial studies, and in growth boxes with sand or with soils for the plant

110

studies. We do not know whether the responses observed with sublethal levels of CuO

111

and ZnO NPs occur in agricultural field native soils. Rather, we review the findings to

112

promote awareness of potential changes in plant-microbe signaling that are set in place

113

with exposure of roots and their associated microbial cells to the NPs.

114

1.3. The root microbiome. This review highlights that plants under field

115

conditions grow in association with microbes. This fact contrasts to the many plant-NP 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

116

studies where the role of a microbiome is not considered. Certain microbial plant

117

colonizers exert changes in the plant that parallel those observed with microbes termed

118

probiotics, which are essential for human health.53 Outcomes for the plant from

119

colonization with the probiotic-like microbes include enhanced growth, changes in

120

morphology, antagonism of microbial pathogens, stimulation of defense mechanisms

121

against environmental stress and improved nutrition. Biofortification of soils with

122

probiotic-like microbes will be likely be an important aspect of the practices employed

123

for sustainable agriculture.54-57 Currently there are several commercial formulations of

124

microbes sold as biofertilizers or biocontrol agents to combat microbial diseases.55,56

125

Thus, it is interesting that there is overlap in agricultural use of these beneficial

126

microbes as fertilizers and pesticides, with proposed uses for NPs.2,6,17-20

127

Microbial populations are greater in rhizosphere, the region around the root

128

influenced by exudation of plant metabolites, than in the surrounding soil.58 These plant

129

exudates provide nutrients to support microbial growth.59-62 However, the complex

130

microbial community structure in soils is disturbed by NP amendments, with both

131

increases and decreases for certain taxa occurring dependent on NP, plant and soil

132

properties.63,64 The soil microbes involved in the nitrogen cycle are among those with

133

documented sensitivity.65-67 Changes in function of a population, such as a loss in

134

function of nitrogen-fixing rhizobium isolates, would in turn affect plant

135

performance.30,65,68 Clearly any formulation for agricultural use should not have

136

deleterious effects on the organisms involved in essential element cycling.16

137 138

The framework for discussion of NPs use in agriculture in this review centers on studies with a pseudomonad able to colonize the roots of many plant species, a process 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 48

139

that improves the plants growth and stress resilience.69 Pseudomonas chlororaphis

140

isolate O6 (PcO6) (Fig. 3) was cultured from the roots of commercial dry land wheat at

141

the end of the growing season in calcareous soil. Like other pseudomonads, it is

142

adaptable to using many substrates for growth utilizing the sugars, organic acid and

143

amino acids that are major metabolites in all root exudates.58-62,70 PcO6 is typical of the

144

many microbes with biological control activity.71-73 For example, colonization of plant

145

roots with PcO6 confers systemic protection against viral, bacterial, and fungal

146

pathogens in the plant. Protection also arises from direct antagonism of microbial

147

pathogen growth caused by production of antibiotics.74-77 PcO6 is lethal to root knot

148

nematodes, with HCN production playing a major role.78 Killing of the larval stage of

149

certain insect pests is conditioned by production of an insecticidal peptide toxin, Fit

150

D.72,79 Root colonization by PcO6 also stimulates in the host plant drought tolerance and

151

resilience to heavy metals.80,81 Thus, the consequence of contributing C and N in root

152

exudates to support colonization of beneficial microbes is the provision of an umbrella of

153

protection for the plant against the array of stresses experienced in a field environment.

154

However, such generalist root colonizers would be among the rhizosphere organisms

155

challenged by NPs when introduced into agricultural soils.

156

157

2. MODIFICATION OF PcO6 METABOLISM BY NPs

158

2.1 The metal oxide NPs. In the studies discussed in the following sections, the CuO

159

and ZnO NPs were used “as-made” from the manufacturer.31,45,46,70, 82 Nanodimensions

160

of the particles were confirmed by microscopy and their chemistry by elemental analysis

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

161

with ICP-MS, XRD and ZANES analysis.82 Aggregation of the particles, shape

162

modification and dissolution under different conditions is reported.46,82

163

2.2. ZnO NPs: Phenazine and AHSL production. PcO6 is an example of the

164

biological control agents that produce the phenazine class of antibiotics (Fig. 3). The

165

phenazines from PcO6 are visualized as orange pigments secreted from the bacterial

166

cell 74 (Fig. 3). Their synthesis occurs from the shikimic acid pathway through

167

chorismate.84 Nutrients, such as the sugars that feed into the shikimic acid pathway in

168

the bacterial cell, are part of the exudates from germinating seeds and plant roots.69

169

Thus, the C and N in the plant exudates is repurposed by bacterial metabolism to

170

generate the phenazines which in turn are beneficial to plant and rhizosphere health.

171

Phenazines originally were examined in vitro for their direct antifungal activities,

172

becoming associated with disease suppression.85 Mutation, so that the bacteria lack

173

phenazine production, reduces the extent of growth inhibition for plant pathogenic fungi

174

by the pseudomonad.85 Phenazines are isolated from native fields soils in which wheat

175

is grown at levels sufficiently high to cause antagonism of pathogen growth.86 This

176

finding indicates that phenazine production is not just a laboratory phenomenon.

177

Phenazines are involved in additional processes that affect plant function.87,88

178

Phenazines are elicitors that prime systemic induced resistance in plants. “Priming”

179

means that the plant responds faster and to a greater extent when subsequently

180

challenged by a stress such as drought or pathogen attack. 76,89-91 Primed defense is

181

observed systemically at sites distant from the inducing microbe. For instance, shoot

182

tissues are protected whereas the inducing microbes are located only on the root

183

surface.76 This systemic induction of resistance augments direct antagonism of 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 10 of 48

184

pathogen growth. These responses illustrate that the phenazines are inter-kingdom

185

signaling chemicals, affecting the functioning of bacteria, the plant as well as fungi in the

186

environment.

187

Effective biocontrol agents display aggressive and sustainable colonization of

188

plant roots. One of the traits needed for sustained colonization is attachment to the root

189

surface followed by growth of the cells embedded within a gel-like matrix as a

190

biofilm92,93 (Fig. 1). The pseudomonad biofilms formed on plant root surfaces protect

191

against challenges of the CuO NPs and ROS that are lethal to planktonic cells.81,94

192

Resilience of biofilm cells to antibiotics generated by other rhizosphere microbes is

193

likely.95 Aspects of biofilm formation are covered in a companion paper in this journal

194

issue by Britt et al. (2017). Thus, biofilm matrix, with its intertwining polymers of

195

polysaccharides, nucleic acids and proteins, provides a protective environment for

196

microbial cell survival.

197

Phenazines play additional roles in biofilm function. For instance, phenazine

198

production in P. chlororaphis 30-84 enhances the extrusion of extracellular DNA levels

199

which becomes part of the biofilm matrix.96 Another role of phenazines in biofilms is to

200

accept electrons and, consequently, aid redox balancing in bacterial cells under

201

anaerobic conditions, which are likely to occur within layered biofilms in the

202

rhizosphere.97 Biofilm formation in pseudomonads is promoted by an adequate iron

203

supply.98,99 Phenazines may through acting as iron chelates promote the release of

204

metals from minerals,100,101 and, thus, enhance microbial biofilm formation. Additionally,

205

their redox activity will reduce ferric to ferrous ions, which can be transported into cells

206

by mechanisms that differ between these charged Fe ions.98 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 48

207

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Phenazine synthesis in pseudomonads is regulated by the Gac/Rsm signal

208

transduction pathway. In PcO6, synthesis is dependent on acyl homoserine lactones

209

(AHSLs) (Fig. 3) produced by activation of the Gac/Rsm pathway.88 Synthesis of an

210

array of AHSLs with different fatty acid chain lengths and of families with the basic

211

phenazine structure applies to PcO683 and other beneficial pseudomonads.102 When

212

the bacterial cells reach a sufficiently high density, the AHSLs reprogram the bacterial

213

cell population to act in unison to initiate phenazine synthesis; an event termed quorum

214

sensing.103 ZnO NPs affect this process. A decrease in phenazine production occurs as

215

ZnO NPs are added to broth medium (Fig. 4). 83,104 These effects were seen at 2 mg

216

soluble Zn/L from ZnO NPs.83 AHSLs also were reduced in levels in broths with the

217

ZnO NP-treatments (Fig. 4).83 The lack of AHSLs correlated to lowered expression from

218

the AHSL synthase gene, phzI.83 Inhibition of phenazine and AHSLs production by the

219

ZnO NPs is duplicated in part by Zn ions but not with the same efficacy as from the

220

NPs.83 We speculate that the NPs are highly effective as a source of Zn for the bacterial

221

cell through metal oxide dissolution. Dissolution of the ZnO NPs could be increased by

222

metabolites produced by the bacterium that are metal chelators, such as siderophores

223

(see Section 2.2) or gluconic acid produced by the bacterial cells.81

224

Reduction of both phenazines and AHSLs by exposure to ZnO NPs could

225

change the effects of potential pathogens in the rhizosphere. The AHSLs, like the

226

phenazines, trigger systemic defense mechanisms in the plant.105,106 Thus, two different

227

metabolites used in signal communication between plant and the rhizosphere microbe

228

are modified in synthesis by the ZnO NPs. Whether other antibiotics produced by

229

PcO6, which are regulated independently of AHSLs within the Gac/RSm network, are

11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 12 of 48

230

modified by the ZnO NPs awaits study. This work with PcO6 also raises the question of

231

whether NPs have a similar impact on the metabolism of other rhizosphere bacteria that

232

produce antimicrobial agents.

233

2.3. ZnO NPs and siderophore production. Coincident with the loss of phenazine

234

production when PcO6 is exposed to ZnO NPs is an increase in a secreted, fluorescent

235

pyoverdine-like siderophore.107 (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). The major function of siderophores is

236

binding Fe3+ ions that are then transported and unloaded into the bacterial cell to

237

provide this essential metal.108,109 Expression from the large biosynthetic cluster of

238

genes involved in pyoverdine synthesis in pseudomonads is highly regulated, with

239

suppression occurring when Fe is adequate.96 Although these biochemical changes

240

were demonstrated in broth cultures, ZnO NPs also had an impact on siderophore

241

production in PcO6 cells colonizing the roots of bean growing in a solid matrix.110

242

Increased pyoverdine levels were detected in bean rhizosphere solutions with the

243

presence of ZnO NPs in the plant growth matrix.110

244

The mechanism underpinning altered expression from the siderophore genes is

245

not clear. Increased pyoverdine production in PcO6 is observed in a mutant in which the

246

GacS environmental signaling protein of the Gac/Rsm controlling network is

247

eliminated.111 This is one of the few traits identified as being negatively regulated by the

248

Gac/Rsm network in isolate PcO6; currently most of the traits studied for this network,

249

such as production of phenazine and AHSLs, are positively regulated.88 Thus, the ZnO

250

NPs appear to induce a gacS-like phenotype to the cells. In a gacS mutant, the

251

translational repression, caused by the binding of the protein RsmA for genes in the gac

252

regulon, cannot be relieved.112 Studies with P. aeruginosa (Pa) show that the 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

253

translation inhibitory protein, RsmA, is a strong repressor of pyoverdine synthesis i.e.,

254

deletion of RsmA in Pa increases pyoverdine production.113 This response is attributed

255

to indirect transcriptional control by RsmA of the alternative sigma factor, PvdS, that is

256

required for expression of the pyoverdine biosynthetic genes. Transcriptional regulation

257

of pvdS is correlated with levels of the intracellular cell signaling compound, c-di-GMP,

258

that are governed by RsmA; a Pa rsmA mutant has higher levels of c-di-GMP.113 This

259

control network would explain the responses of PcO6 but is puzzling in light of other

260

studies in Escherichia coli where Zn ions are inhibitory to protein diguanylate cyclase

261

that produces c-di-GMP,114 meaning that with Zn inhibition, levels of c-di GMP would be

262

lowered. Whether Zn modifies c-di-GMP levels in pseudomonad cells is not known.

263

The increase in pyoverdine-like siderophore production from rhizosphere bacteria

264

triggered by ZnO NPs (Fig. 4) may be advantageous to the plant. Several potential

265

outcomes exist. First, the chelation efficiency for Fe of the siderophore could limit

266

growth of pathogenic rhizosphere microbes. This possibility is likely because pyoverdine

267

has high binding capacity for Fe. Indeed siderophore production from fluorescent

268

pseudomonads was among the first traits to be associated with suppression of disease

269

caused by fungal pathogens in the field.115,116 Second, plants may access the Fe from

270

the loaded pyoverdine-like siderophores117-119 for nutritional benefit. Third, the

271

pyoverdine-like siderophores also are among the microbial metabolites that stimulate

272

systemic plant resistance mechanisms.120-122 Thus, under laboratory conditions

273

although the ZnO NPs reduce production of the interkingdom cell signaling metabolites,

274

phenazines and AHSLs from PcO6, there is enhanced production of another

275

interkingdom signaling compound, a pyoverdine-like siderophore. If these phenomena

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 14 of 48

276

occur in native soils, there is potential for changes in plant defense against pathogen

277

attack.

278

2.4. CuO NPs and PcO6 metabolism. In contrast to the increase by ZnO NPs in

279

siderophore production by PcO6, CuO NPs decrease the pyoverdine levels (Fig. 4).123

280

Analysis of gene expression in the PcO6 cells finds lower transcript abundance from

281

genes encoding the cytoplasmic transporter and proteins involved in periplasmic

282

maturation of the pyoverdine precursor with CuO NPs.123 Thus, the chemistries of these

283

two metal oxide NPs elicit different cellular responses in the microbe.

284

Opposing regulation in PcO6 in response to the two NPs also is observed with

285

the production of a plant growth regulator IAA (Fig. 4). In PcO6, IAA is synthesized from

286

the amino acid, tryptophan, which is among the array of amino acids detected in root

287

exudates at levels varying between plant types.59 IAA production in PcO6 was

288

enhanced by CuO NPs but repressed by ZnO NPs.124The mechanisms causing these

289

effects await elucidation. However, further complexity with the Gac/Rsm regulon is

290

evident because IAA production from tryptophan also is boosted by deletion of GacS in

291

PcO6.125 Thus, stimulation of IAA production by ZnO NPs would be expected if these

292

NPs produced a gacS-like phenotype. We speculate that there must be a strong

293

inhibitory effect of Zn at a site currently unidentified in the tryptophan-dependent

294

synthesis of IAA.

295

IAA production by PcO6 cells colonizing wheat roots affects root morphology

296

when the growth matrix is supplemented with tryptophan.126 The wheat roots shorten

297

and prolific and elongated root hairs are observed, as reported for roots exposed to

298

authentic IAA or other IAA-producing microbes.127 IAA production by root-associated 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

299

microbes has field significance because this trait is one prevalent in isolates displaying

300

plant growth promotion and the ability to enhance metal phytoremediation.128,129

301

These studies illustrate that the metabolism of the rhizosphere-colonist PcO6 can

302

be tuned by Cu or Zn supplied through NPs (Fig. 4). The metabolites that change in

303

level affect functions of plants and fungi that are involved in plant health.

304

3. PLANT RESPONSES TO NPs

305

3.1. NPs and their impact on plant roots. Plants closely control Cu and Zn

306

homeostasis. The physical mechanisms to limit toxicity differ between the metals:

307

excess Cu is held largely within plant cell walls, whereas Zn is contained within

308

vacuoles.130,131 Studies with CuO NPs indicate that the capture of Cu by root cell walls is

309

important to limit Cu flux into the shoots of the rice plant.32 Both CuO and ZnO NPs

310

increase lignification in roots of several plant species through processes that involve

311

altered peroxidase activities.132-133 These changes may be a generalized response to

312

increased ROS in the plant tissue due to enhanced metal levels.13

313

The NPs also manipulate the plasticity of root morphology with outcomes that

314

differ between the ZnO and CuO NPs (Fig. 5). Both outcome however would increase

315

root surface area potentially providing more support for colonization by beneficial

316

microbes. When grown with CuO NPs, the roots of wheat seedlings are shortened in

317

length (e.g., from 12-14 cm for controls to less than 4 cm with CuO NPs depending on

318

dose) and there is prolific elongated root hair formation close to the root tip114 (Fig. 5).

319

With sand as the growth matrix for 7 d-wheat seedlings, these morphological changes

320

occur at doses of 10 mg Cu/kg sand.126 Shortening of root length in wheat is extreme in

321

acidic soils (Fig. 5) and correlates with dissolution of CuO NPs, whereas in calcareous 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 48

322

soil there is mitigation of toxicity.26 The changes in root hair patterning may not be

323

universal for plants; for instance, Cu ion treatment of cowpea also causes root stunting

324

but the root hairs become shortened.134

325

The gross morphological changes observed in wheat tips grown with CuO NPs,

326

resemble those from high IAA levels.26 We speculate that the dissolution of CuO NPs in

327

the root tip zone allows Cu to accumulate to a level that affects the normal inverted

328

fountain flow of IAA as it unloads from the stele. Root exposure to Cu ions is reported to

329

inhibit a specific efflux pump in the plant cells at the base of the stele, causing IAA flux

330

in the root tip cells to be modified.135

331

The CuO NPs were more effective in induction of root hair proliferation than Cu

332

ions, but this could be attributed to dilution of the ion concentration in the rhizosphere

333

space below that of the gradient of ions being released from NP aggregated on the root

334

surface.113 The phenomenon of CuO NP-enhanced root hair formation, could benefit

335

plants in the field because root hairs are involved in nutrient and water uptake.136,137 It is

336

possible that the entrapment of the CuO NPs onto the root hairs (Fig. 1), as revealed by

337

microscopic imaging,114 is important to this phenomenon.

338

3.2. Lateral root growth proliferation. Growth with ZnO NPs has no effect on the

339

differentiation of epidermal cells into root hairs. However, lateral roots are induced when

340

wheat seedlings are grown in sand and calcareous soils (Fig. 5).31 Lateral root formation

341

is dependent on Zn in other plants138 and consequently the changes in wheat caused by

342

the ZnO NPs may depend on their dissolution in the rhizosphere or root tissues. The

343

molecular basis of stimulation of lateral root primordia is not fully understood, although

344

oscillations in IAA in the root tip are proposed to be involved and IAA signaling is 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

345

required in the transforming cells.139-141 Clearly, any changes in IAA triggered by ZnO

346

NPs must differ from those caused by CuO NPs because the resulting root

347

morphologies are distinct (Fig. 5). Stimulated lateral root formation by formulations with

348

ZnO NPs could also be valuable under field conditions because they will increase

349

nutrient and water uptake. It is notable that lateral root hairs are especially involved in

350

uptake of Si that increases plant strength and resilience to pathogens.142

351

3.3. CuO and ZnO NPs and their impact on plant’s response to stress. At doses of

352

ZnO or CuO NPs that cause changes in root morphology (300 mg M/kg), there are

353

effects on transcript accumulations in the roots, as well as systemically in the shoots

354

(Anderson et al, unpublished). Transcript analysis in the roots show increased

355

expression of genes associated with resistance to metal stress incited by ion

356

exposure.81 These findings suggest that the plant perceives metal ions released from

357

the NPs. Colonization of the plant root with PcO6 reduces the extent of transcript

358

abundance, about 2-3 fold.81 We speculate that the lowered transcript levels could be

359

due a protective effect of the PcO6 biofilm (Fig. 1) on the root in which NPs become

360

embedded likely altering mobility of released metal, thus, reducing the exposure of root

361

epidermal cells to the released metal or NPs.

362

Increased transcript levels for metal stress are observed in the shoot tissues

363

(Anderson, unpublished). The shoots are not in immediate contact with the bacterium

364

and lack NPs on their surfaces.81 Also, transcripts, anticipated to have a role in drought

365

and pathogen stress, are elevated in the shoot tissues (Anderson et al. unpublished),

366

illustrating cross-talk between stress responses for metals, pathogen attack and water

367

deficiency. Annotation of the function of the transcripts indicates that many are 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 18 of 48

368

associated with improved tolerance to water stress regulated by abscisic acid. This

369

finding indicates the NPs target another plant cell signaling process in addition to

370

modification of IAA. Preliminary studies with drought stress on plants reveals that PcO6-

371

colonized wheat seedlings growing with CuO NPs have a superior shoot stand after a

372

drought period than control plants grown without these treatments (Fig. 6). The

373

underlying mechanisms are being investigated and may relate to NP-induced cell wall

374

modifications as well as the altered transcriptome associated with drought tolerance.

375

The findings another consequence for the plant to exposure to NPs: the induction of a

376

higher level of plant tolerance to drought could be valuable under field conditions.

377

378

4. SUMMARY OF RHIZOSPHERE EFFECTS OF CuO AND ZnO NPs.

379

CuO and ZnO NPs alter processes important in the rhizosphere that are involved in

380

plant health in addition to the nutritional effect of increased tissue levels of Cu and Zn

381

(Fig. 6). These changes are correlated with specific effects on cell signaling

382

compounds that communicate between the plant and the root-colonizing microbe. The

383

consequences of NP challenge of the probiotic PcO6 involve altered levels of

384

interkingdom signaling metabolites including antifungal products (e.g., phenazines and

385

siderophores), quorum sensing coordinators (e.g., AHSLs), Fe-chelating siderophores

386

(e.g., pyoverdine) and the plant growth regulator IAA, Fig. 6). Thus, there is potential to

387

affect antifungal protection and Fe supply in the rhizosphere, as well as induced

388

systemic resistance in the plant.

389 390

Growth morphology in the plant may be altered by effects on the microbial levels of IAA as well as by direct disturbance of the flux of plant-produced IAA at the root tip. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

391

Increased lateral root formation (ZnO NPs) and proliferation of elongated root hairs

392

(CuO NPs) would have a beneficial impact on plant nutrition and water uptake. Also

393

there would be greater surface area for colonization by microbes. Systemic effects

394

induced by the NPs include cell signaling to promote altered gene expression increasing

395

the plants’ resilience to drought stress. The differences in the chemistry of the metals in

396

the metal oxide NPs governs the plant and microbial responses. Collectively the

397

findings illustrate the power of localized concentrations of the essential metals, Cu and

398

Zn, to affect rhizosphere processes that are key to plant health under environmental

399

stress.

400 401

5. FACTORS GOVERNING THE EFFICACY OF FORMULATIONS OF NPS FOR AGRICULTURE.

402

The basic scientific findings discussed for the CuO and ZnO NPs are from studies with

403

particles that were “as-made” from the manufacturer. Thus, any impact of engineered

404

coatings of the NPs that could alter their bioactivity is not explored in these studies. The

405

plants were grown without gross pore water movement, such as would result from a rain

406

event. The growth matrix, sand, was selected to reduce factors that could chelate

407

released metal ions. It lacked minerals, organic materials and other microbes

408

characteristic of native soil. The studies also are of a model system with only a single

409

microbe being addressed, whereas crop plants associate with diverse microbes, both as

410

endophytes and as surface colonizers. Microbial soil populations are diverse144,145 and

411

respond to many inputs including current farming practices that change plant diversity

412

and ecotypes.146-148The rhizosphere in agricultural soils has many microbial and

413

eukaryotic interactive partners that will influence responses to NPs (Fig 1).

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

414

Page 20 of 48

Consistent with the findings reviewed here and elsewhere is the importance of

415

the cell’s response to a gradient of metal release from the metal oxide NPs. Dissolution

416

of the metal oxide NPs could be intense at the site of the nanoparticle at an intracellular

417

or extracellular location with the cell.149 Soil factors especially pH would influence NP

418

dissolution. For example, acid soils would cause greater metal dissolution than a basic

419

soil.150 Microsites of different pH of the root surface exists; root hairs secrete protons

420

along with the plant metabolites. NP dissolution is promoted by metal chelators,

421

including siderophores, as well as the organic and amino acids that are part of root and

422

microbial exudates.46,151These acids would have the highest concentrations as they are

423

being released into the rhizosphere space, but metabolite levels will drop with distance

424

from the root surface in part through consumption by rhizosphere microbes.70 The

425

extent and composition of organic soil matter, such as the fulvic and humic acids, also

426

would affect metal bioavailability.151 The chemistry and sorption properties of the soil

427

would modify NP effects.152 Salts with Na, K and Ca as cations, at levels similar to those

428

in saline soils, relieve NP phytotoxic effects.153

429

A major research thrust with nanoagrochemicals is to boost the bioavailability of

430

the native soil. It is an innovative research field. Two recent papers show NPs increase

431

P supply to plants. In one paper, where ZnO NPs increase P uptake in mung bean, the

432

proposed mechanism involves a chemical “hand-off chain”. Enhanced Zn bioavailability

433

to the plant from the NPs allowed the roots to increase phosphatase activity which

434

liberated Zn from zinc phosphate generated the metal release from NP dissolution.154

435

The second paper, showing increased phosphate in lettuce upon growth with TiO2 and

436

Fe3O4 NPs, implicates several mechanisms, including NP- induced changes in root

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

437

exudation that acidified the rhizosphere to enhance P release.155 A third paper reports

438

that Fe could be increased for rice grown in calcareous soils by the presence of coated

439

Fe3O4 NPs. The proposed mechanism involved Fe release from the NPs that

440

counteracted the effect on rice of excess Ca ions.156 Other nanosized products are cited

441

for improving plant resistance to pathogens. Such products contain silica157 and elicitors

442

of plant resistance, nano-sized glucans and chitosan.158,159

443

Engineering the formulations of the NPs by coating and mixing of chemical

444

composition will be required to optimize field performance. The formulations will differ

445

whether the products are applied to seeds, to the soil or as an aerial application. The

446

products may be time-released and targeted only to provide the stimulus at the right

447

location and the right time for the plant.18 Our abilities to predict the function of NP

448

formulations in different soils and with varied crops yet awaits the acquisition of

449

information bases to coordinate multiple physical, chemical and biological factors.

450

Acknowledgements. The authors thank the support of the USDA (NIFA Grant Number

451

10867118, 2012-2015 and funding to JEM from the Utah Water Research Laboratory.

452

We thank the assistance of many undergraduates and high school students who have

453

been engaged in this work: Joshua Adams, Alicia Calder, Stephanie Doxey, Jordan

454

Goodman, Trevor Hanson, Nicole Martineau, Jacob Stewart, Hannah Wagner, Melanie

455

Wright, Zac Zabrieski, Tommy Fang, Jean-Luc Watson, Andre Watson, and Dema Al

456

Qassy.

457 458 459

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

460

Page 22 of 48

References

461 462

1. Wang, P.; Lombi, E.; Zhao, F.J.; Kopittke PM. Nanotechnology: a new opportunity in

463

plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 699-712. doi:

464

10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.005.

465

2. Ghormade, V.; Deshpande, M.V. ; Paknikar, K.M. Perspectives for nano-

466

biotechnology enabled protection and nutrition of plants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29,

467

792-803. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.007.

468 469 470 471 472 473

3. Sekhon BS. Nanotechnology in agri-food production: an overview. Nanotechnol. Sci.

Appl. 2014,7, 31-53. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S39406. 4. DeRosa, M.C.; Monreal, C.; Schnitzer, M.; Walsh, R.; Sultan, Y., Nanotechnology

in fertilizers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5:9. 5. Grillo, R.; Abhilash, P.C.; Fraceto, L.F. Nanotechnology applied to bio-encapsulation

of pesticides. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016 ,16,1231-1244.

474

6. Khot, L.R.; Sankaran, S.; Maja, J.M.; Ehsani, R.; Schuster, E. W. Applications of

475

nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: A review. Crop

476

Protection. 2012, 35, 64-70.

477

7. Kim, B.; Murayama, M.; Colman, B.P.; Hochella, M.F. Jr. Characterization and

478

environmental implications of nano- and larger TiO(2) particles in sewage sludge,

479

and soils amended with sewage sludge. J. Environ. Monit. 2012, 14,1129-1137. doi:

480

10.1039/c2em10809g

481

8. Tou, F.; Yang, Y.; Feng, J.; Niu, Z.; Pan, H.; Qin, Y.; Guo, X.; Meng, X.; Liu, M.;

482

Hochella, M. F. Environmental risk implications of metals in sludges from waste

483

water treatment plants: the discovery of vast stores of metal-

484

containing nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 4831–4840. doi:

485

10.1021/acs.est.6b05931

486

9. Rico, C.M.; Majumdar, S.; Duarte-Gardea, M.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-

487

Torresdey, J.L. Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible

488

implications in the food chain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59,3485-3498. doi:

489

10.1021/jf104517j.

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

490

10. Unrine, J.M.; Shoults-Wilson, W.A.; Zhurbich, O.; Bertsch, P.M.; Tsyusko, O.V.

491

Trophic transfer of Au nanoparticles from soil along a simulated terrestrial food

492

chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 9753-9760. doi: 10.1021/es3025325

493

11. Kubo-Irie, M.; Yokoyama, M.; Shinkai, Y.; Niki, R.; Takeda, K.; Irie, M. The transfer

494

of titanium dioxide nanoparticles from the host plant to butterfly larvae through a

495

food chain. Sci .Rep. 2016, 6:23819. doi: 10.1038/srep23819.

496

12. Sadeghi, R.; Rodriguez, R.J.;Yao, Y.; Kokini JL. Advances in nanotechnology as

497

they pertain to food and agriculture: benefits and risks. Annu. Rev. Food Sci.

498

Technol. 2017, 8, 467-492. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033338

499

13. Ma, C.; White, J.C.; Dhankher, O.P.; Xing, B. Metal-based nanotoxicity and

500

detoxification pathways in higher plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7109-7122.

501

doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00685.

502

14. Yadav,T.; Mungray, A.A.; Mungray, A. K. Fabricated nanoparticles: current status

503

and potential phytotoxic threats. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 230, 83-110.

504

doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04411-8_4.

505

15. Miralles, P.; Church, T.L.; Harris, A. T. Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of

506

engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:9224-

507

9239. doi: 10.1021/es202995d.

508

16. Dimkpa, C.O. Can nanotechnology deliver the promised benefits without negatively

509

impacting soil microbial life? J. Basic Microbiol. 2014, 54,889-904. doi:

510

10.1002/jobm.201400298

511 512 513

17. Liu, R.; Lal, R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing

agronomic productions. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2015, 514, 131-139. 18. Monreal, C. M.; DeRosa, M.; Mallubhotla, S. C.; Bindraban, P. S.; Dimkpa C.

514

Nanotechnologies for increasing the crop use efficiency of fertilizer micronutrients.

515

Biol. Fert. Soils. 2016, 52, 423-437

516 517 518 519

19. Liu, R.; Lal, R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing

agronomic productions. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2015, 514, 131-139. 20. Servin, A.; Elmer, W.; Mukherjee, A.; De la Torre-Roche, R.; Hamdi, H.; White, J. C.;

Bindraban, P.; Dimkpa C., A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to

23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 24 of 48

520

suppress plant disease and enhance crop yield. J. Nanoparticle Research. 2015, 17,

521

1-1203.

522 523 524 525 526 527 528

21. Marschner, H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press. Third Edition.

2011. pp 672.San Diego. USA. 22. Welch, R.M.; Shuman, L. Micronutrient nutrition of plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1995,

14, 49–82. 23. McBride, M.B. Environmental chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, New York,

1994. pp 339. 24. Roy, R.N.; Finck, A.; Blair, G.J.; Tandon, H.L.S. Plant nutrition for food security: a

529

guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertil. Plant Nutr. Bull. 2006,

530

ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/ fao/009/a0443e/a0443e.pdf . Accessed April 27th 2017.

531

25. Alloway, B.J. Soil factors associated with zinc deficiency in crops and humans.

532 533

Environ. Geochem. Health 2009, 31, 537–548. 26. Borill, P.; Connorton, J.M.; Balk, J.; Miller, A.J.; Sanders, D.; Uauy, C. Biofortification

534

of wheat grain with iron and zinc: integrating novel genomic resources and

535

knowledge from model crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 53. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.

536

00053, 21 Feb 2014.

537 538

27. Purves, D.; Ragg,J. M. Copper deficient soils in South East Scotland. Europ. J. Soil

Sci. 1962, 13, 241-246.

539

28. Zhou, L.X.; Wong, J. W. C. Effect of dissolved organic matter from sludge and

540

sludge compost on soil copper sorption. J. Environ.Quality. 2000, 30, 878-883.

541

doi:10.2134/jeq2001.303878x.

542

29. Karlsson, T. R. N.; Persson, P. ; Skyllberg, U. Complexation of copper (II) in organic

543

soils and in dissolved organic matter-EXAFS evidence for chelate ring structures.

544

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 2623-2628.

545

30. Priester, J.H.; Ge, Y.; Mielke, R.E.; Horst, A.M.; Moritz, S.C.; Espinosa, K.; Gelb, J.;

546

Walker, S.L.; Nisbet, R.M.; An, Y.J.; Schimel, J.P.; Palmer, R.G.; Hernandez-

547

Viezcas, J.A.; Zhao, L.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Holden, P.A. Soybean susceptibility

548

to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility

549

interruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012,109, E2451–E2456.

24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 48

550

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

31. Watson, J.L.; Fang, T.; Dimkpa, C.O.; Britt, D.W.; McLean, J.E.; Jacobson, A.;

551

Anderson, A. The phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles on wheat varies

552

with soil properties. J. Biometals. 2015, 28,101-112. doi: 10.1007/s10534-014-9806-

553

8.

554

32. Peng, C., Duan, D., Xu, C., Chen, Y., Sun, L., Zhang, H., Yuan, X., Zheng, L., Yang,

555

Y., Yang, J., Zhen, X., Chen, Y., Shi, J. Translocation and biotransformation

556

of CuO nanoparticles in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 197, 99-

557

107. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.008

558

33. Anderson, A.; McLean, J.; McManus, P.; Britt D. Soil chemistry influences the

559

phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Internat. J. Nanotechnol. 2017. 14, 15-21

560

DOI: 10.1504/IJNT.2017.082438

561

34. López-Moreno, M.L.; de la Rosa, G.; Hernández-Viezcas, J.A.; Castillo-Michel,

562

H., Botez, C.E.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Evidence of the

563

differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on

564

soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Techno. 2010, 44, 7315–7320.

565

35. Zhao, L.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Ren, M.; Varela-Ramirez, A.; Li, C.; Hernandez-

566

Viezcas, J.A.; Aguilera, R.J.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Transport of Zn in a sandy

567

loam soil treated with ZnO NPs and uptake by corn plants: Electron microprobe and

568

confocal microscopy studies. Chem. Engin. J. 2012, 184,1-8.

569

36. Wang, Z.; Xie, X.; Zhao, J.; Liu, X.; Feng, W.; White, J.C.; Xing, B. Xylem- and

570

phloem-based transport of CuO nanoparticles in maize (Zea mays L.). Environ. Sci.

571

Technol. 2012, 46, 4434-4441.

572

37. Iannone, M.F.; Groppa, M.D.; de Sousa, M.D.; van Raap, M.S.F.; Benavides, M.P.

573

Impact of magnetite iron oxide nanoparticles on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

574

development: evaluation of oxidative damage. Environ. Expt. Bot. 131, 2016, 77-88.

575

38. Zhu, H.; Han, J.; Xiao, J.Q.; Jin. Y. Uptake, translocation, and accumulation of

576

manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. J. Environ. Monit. 2008,

577

10,713-7. doi: 10.1039/b805998e.

578 579

25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

580

Page 26 of 48

39. Zhang, D.; Hua, T.; Xiao, F.; Chen, C.; Gersberg, R.M.; Liu, Y.; Stuckey, D.; Ng,

581

W.J.; Tan, S.K. Phytotoxicity and bioaccumulation of ZnO nanoparticles in

582

Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani. Chemosphere. 2015, 120, 11-19.

583

40. Castiglione. M, R.; Giorgetta, L.; Bellani, L.; Muccifora, S.; Bottega, S.; Spano, C.

584

Root responses to different types of TiO2 nanoparticles and bulk counterpart in a

585

plant model system, Vicia faba L. Environ. Expt. Botany. 2016, 130,11-21.

586

41. Servin, A.D.; Pagano, L.; Castillo-Michel, H.; De la Torre-Roche, R.; Hawthorne, J.;

587

Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Loredo-Portales, R.; Majumdar, S.; Gardea-Torresday J.;

588

Dhankher, O.P.; White, J.C. Weathering in soil increases nanoparticle CuO

589

bioaccumulation within a terrestrial foodchain. Nanotoxicology. 2017, 11, 98-111.

590

doi: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1277274.

591

42. Jayaseelan, C.; Abdul Rahuman, A.; Kirthi, A.V.; Marimuthu, S.; Santhoshkumar, T.;

592

Bagavan, A.; Gaurav, K.; Karthik, L.; Bhaskara-Rao, K.V. Novel microbial route to

593

synthesize ZnO nanoparticles using Aeromonas hydrophila and their activity against

594

pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012,

595

90, 78–84.

596

43. He, L.; Liu, Y.; Mustapha, Z.; Lin, M. Antifungal activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles

597

against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum. Microbiol. Res. 2011,166, 207–

598

215.

599

44. Kairyte, K.; Kadys, A.; Luksiene, Z. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of

600

photoactivated ZnO nanoparticles in suspension. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2013,

601

128, 78–84.

602

45. Dimkpa, C.O.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Anderson, A.J. Antifungal activity of ZnO

603

nanoparticles and their interactive effect with a biocontrol bacterium on growth

604

antagonism of the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Biometals. 2013, 26,

605

913–924.

606

46. Zabrieski, Z.; Morrell, E.; Hortin, J.; Dimkpa, C.; McLean, J.; Britt, D.; Anderson, A.

607

Pesticidal activity of metal oxide nanoparticles on plant pathogenic isolates of

608

Pythium. Ecotoxicology. 2015, 24,1305-1314. doi: 10.1007/s10646-015-1505-x.

26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

609

47. Pelgrift, R.Y.; Friedman A. J. Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat

610

microbial resistance. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65,13-14. 1803-15. doi:

611

10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.011.

612

48. Mullen, M.D.; Wolf, D.C.; Ferris, F.G.; Beveridge, T.J.; Flemming. C.A; Bailey, G.W.

613

Bacterial sorption of heavy metals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55,3143-3149.

614

49. Wang, P.; De Schamphelaere, K.A.; Kopittke, P.M.; Zhou, D.M.; Peijnenburg, W.J.;

615

Lock, K. Development of an electrostatic model predicting copper toxicity to plants.J.

616

Exp. Bot. 2012, 63,659-668. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err254.

617

50. Caille, O.; Rossier, C.; Perron, K. A copper-activated two-component system

618

interacts with zinc and imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J.

619

Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 4561-4568.

620

51. Applerot, G.; Lellouche, J.; Lipovsky, A.; Nitzan, Y.; Lubart, R.; Gedanken, A.; Banin,

621

E. Understanding the antibacterial mechanism of CuO nanoparticles: revealing the

622

route of induced oxidative stress. Small. 2012, 8, 3326–3337.

623

doi:10.1002/smll.201200772

624

52. Zuverza-Mena, N.; Martínez-Fernández, D.; Du, W.; Hernandez-

625

Viezcas,J.A.; Bonilla-Bird, N.; López-Moreno, M.L.; Komárek, M.; Peralta-Videa,

626

J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. Exposure of engineered nanomaterials to plants:

627

Insights into the physiological and biochemical responses-a review. Plant Physiol.

628

Biochem. 2017, 110, 236-264. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.037.

629

53. Neef, A.; Sanz, Y. Future for probiotic science in functional food and dietary

630

supplement development. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2013, 16,679-687.

631

doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328365c258.

632 633 634 635 636

54. Fravel, D. R. Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annu. Rev.

Phytopathol. 2005,43, 337-359. 55. Pal, K. K.; Gardener, B. M. Biological control of plant pathogens. Plant Health

Instructor 2006, 2,1117-1142. 56. Dodd, I.C.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Microbial enhancement of crop resource use

637

efficiency. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23,236-242. doi:

638

10.1016/j.copbio.2011.09.005.

27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

639

57. Timmusk, S.; Behers, L.; Muthoni, J.; Muraya, A.; Aronsson AC. Perspectives and

640

challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2017.

641

8,49. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00049.

642 643 644

Page 28 of 48

58. Rouatt, J.W.; Katznelson, H. A study of the bacteria on the root surface and in the

rhizosphere soil of crop plants. J. Applied Microbiol. 1961, 24,164-171. 59. Kamilova, F.; Kravchenko, L. V.; Shaposhnikov, A. I.; Azarova, T.; Makarova, N.;

645

Lugtenberg, B. Organic acids, sugars, and L-tryptophane in exudates of vegetables

646

growing on stonewool and their effects on activities of rhizosphere bacteria. Mol.

647

Plant Microbe. In. 2006, 19, 250-256.

648

60. Lesuffleur, F.; Paynel, F., Bataillé, M.-P., Le Deunff, E. and Cliquet, J.-B. Root amino

649

acid exudation: measurement of high efflux rates of glycine and serine from six

650

different plant species. Plant Soil. 2007, 294, 235-246.

651 652 653

61. Dakora, F. D.; Phillips, D. A. Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in

low-nutrient environments. Plant Soil. 2002, 245, 35-47. 62. Hirsch, P. R.; Miller, A. J.; Dennis, P. G. Do root exudates exert more influence on

654

rhizosphere bacterial community structure than other rhizodeposits? 2013. 1 & 2

655

vols. Vol. 1, Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere. John Wiley & Sons

656

Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.

657

63. Rousk, J.; Ackermann, K.; Curling, S.F.; Jones, D.L. Comparative toxicity of

658

nanoparticulate CuO and ZnO to soil bacterial communities. PLoS One. 2012 7,

659

e34197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034197.

660

64. Ge, Y.; Priester J.H.,;Van De Werfhorst, L.C.; Walker, S.L.; Nisbet, R.M.; An, Y.J.;

661

Schimel, J.P.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Holden, P.A. Soybean plants modify metal

662

oxide nanoparticle effects on soil bacterial communities. Environ. Sci. Technol.

663

2014, 48.13489-13496. doi: 10.1021/es5031646.

664

65. Boddupalli, A.; Tiwari, R.; Sharma, A.; Singh, S.; Prasanna R.; Nain, L. Elucidating

665

the interactions and phytotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles with agriculturally

666

beneficial bacteria and selected crop plants. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 2017, Jan 20.

667

doi: 10.1007/s12223-017-0495-.

28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 48

668

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

66. Kostigen Mumper, C.K.; Ostermeyer, A.K.; Semprini, L.; Radniecki, T.S. Influence of

669

ammonia on silver nanoparticle dissolution and toxicity to Nitrosomonas europaea.

670

Chemosphere. 2013, 93, 2493-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.098.

671

67. Beddow, J.; Stolpe, B.; Cole, P.A.; Lead, J.R.; Sapp, M.; Lyons, B.P.; Colbeck, I.;

672

Whitby C. Nanosilver inhibits nitrification and reduces ammonia-oxidising bacterial

673

but not archaeal amoA gene abundance in estuarine sediments. Environ. Microbiol.

674

2017, 19, 500-510. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13441.

675

68. Burke, D.J.; Pietrasiak, N.; Situ, S.F.; Abenojar, E.C.; Porche, M.; Kraj, P.; Lakliang,

676

Y.; Samia, A.C. Iron oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticle effects on plant

677

performance and root associated microbes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16,23630-50. doi:

678

10.3390/ijms161023630.

679

69. Berendsen, R.L.; Pieterse, C.M.; Bakker, P.A. The rhizosphere microbiome

680

and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 478-486.

681

doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001.

682

70. Martineau, N.; McLean, J. E.; Dimkpa, C.O.; Britt, D.W.; Anderson, A; J.

683

Components from wheat roots modify the bioactivity of ZnO and

684

CuO nanoparticles in a soil bacterium. Environ Pollut. 2014, 187, 65-72. doi:

685

10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.022.

686 687 688

71. Weller, D. M. Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with

bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1988, 26, 379-407. 72. Loper, J. E., Hassan, K. A., Mavrodi, D. V., Davis II, E. W., Lim, C. K., Shaffer, B. T.,

689

Elbourne, L. D. H., Stockwell, V. O., Hartney, S. L., Breakwell, K. and al.,

690

Comparative genomics of plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: insights into

691

diversity and inheritance of traits involved in multitrophic interactions. PLoS Genet.

692

2012, 8:e1002784.

693

73. Pieterse, C. M. J.; Zamioudis, C.; Berendsen, R. L.; Weller, D. M.; Van Wees, S. C.

694

M.; Bakker, P. A. H. M. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu.

695

Rev. Phytopathol. 2014, 52, 347-375.

696

74. Spencer, M.; Ryu, C.-M.; Yang, K.-Y.; Kim, Y. C.; Kloepper, J. W.; Anderson, A. J.

697

Induced defence in tobacco by Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain O6 involves at

698

least the ethylene pathway. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 63, 27-34. 29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 30 of 48

699

75. Ryu, C.-M.; Kang, B. R.; Han, S. H.; Cho, S. M.; Kloepper, J. W.; Anderson, A. J.;

700

Kim, Y. C. Tobacco cultivars vary in induction of systemic resistance against

701

Cucumber mosaic virus and growth promotion by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6

702

and its gacS mutant. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2007, 119, 383-390.

703

76. Kim, M. S.; Kim, Y. C.; Cho, B. H. Gene expression analysis in cucumber leaves

704

primed by root colonization with Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 upon challenge-

705

inoculation with Corynespora cassiicola. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 105-108.

706

77. Park, J. Y.; Oh, S. A.; Anderson, A. J.; Neiswender, J.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, Y. C.

707

Production

of

the

antifungal compounds

phenazine

and

pyrrolnitrin

from

708

Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is differentially regulated by glucose. Lett. Appl.

709

Microbiol. 2011, 52, 532-537.

710

78. Lee, J. H.; Ma, K. C.; Ko, S. J.; Kang, B. R.; Kim, I. S.; Kim, Y. C. Nematicidal

711

activity of a nonpathogenic biocontrol bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6.

712

Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 62, 746-751.

713

79. Rangel, L. I., Henkels, M. D., Shaffer, B. T., Walker, F. L., Davis II, E. W., Stockwell,

714

V. O., Bruck, D., Taylor, B. J. and Loper, J. E. Characterization of toxin complex

715

gene clusters and insect toxicity of bacteria representing four subgroups of

716

Pseudomonas fluorescens. PLoS One. 2016, 11, e0161120.

717

80. Cho, S. M.; Kang, B. R.; Han, S. H.; Anderson, A. J.; Park, J.-Y.; Lee, Y.-H.; et al.

718

2R, 3R-butanediol, a bacterial volatile produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6,

719

is involved in induction of systemic tolerance to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol.

720

Plant Microbe. In. 2008, 21,1067-1107.

721

81. Wright, M.; Adams, J.;Yang, K.; McManus, P.; Jacobson, A.; Gade, A.; McLean, J.;

722

Britt, D.; Anderson, A., A root-colonizing pseudomonad lessens stress responses in

723

wheat imposed by CuO nanoparticles. PLoS One. 2016, 11, e0164635

724

82. Dimkpa, C. O.; Latta, D. E., McLean, J. E.; Britt, D. W.; Boyanov, M. I.; Anderson, A.

725

J. Fate of CuO and ZnO nano- and microparticles in the plant environment. Environ.

726

Sci. Technol. 2013, 47,4734-42. doi: 10.1021/es304736y.

727

83. Goodman, J.; Mclean, J. E.; Britt, D. W.; Anderson, A. J. Sublethal doses of ZnO

728

nanoparticles remodel production of cell signaling metabolites in the root colonizer

729

Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6. Environ. Sci.-Nano. 2016, 3, 1103-1113. 30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 31 of 48

730

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

84. Mavrodi DV, Parejko JA, Mavrodi OV, Kwak YS, Weller DM, Blankenfeldt W,

731

Thomashow LS. Recent insights into the diversity, frequency and ecological roles

732

of phenazines in fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 675-

733

686. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02846.x.

734

85. Thomashow, L.S.; Weller, D.M. Role of a phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas

735

fluorescens in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici.J.

736

Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 3499-3508.

737

86. Mavrodi D.V.; Mavrodi,O.V.; Parejko,J.A.; Bonsall, R.F.; Kwak,Y-S.; Paulitz, T.C.;

738

Thomashow,L.S.; Weller D.M. Accumulation of the antibiotic phenazine-1-carboxylic

739

acid in the rhizosphere of dryland cereals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 804–

740

812. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06784-11.

741 742

87. Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LE, Newman DK. Rethinking 'secondary' metabolism:

physiological roles for phenazine antibiotics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 71-78.

743

88. Kang, B. R.; Han, S.-H.; Zdor, R. E.; Anderson, A. J.; Spencer, M.; Yang, K. Y.; Kim,

744

Y. H.; Lee, M. C.; Cho, B. H.; Kim, Y. C. Inhibition of seed germination and induction

745

of systemic disease resistance by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 requires

746

phenazine production regulated by the global regulator, gacS. J. Microbiol.

747

Biotechnol. 2007,17,586-593.

748 749 750

89. Conrath, U.; Beckers, G. J.; Langenbach, C. J.; Jaskiewicz, M. R. Priming for

enhanced defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2015, 53, 97-119. 90. Mauch-Mani, B.; Baccelli, I.; Luna, E.; Flors, V. Defense priming: an adaptive part of

751

induced resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, Feb 2. doi: 10.1146/annurev-

752

arplant-042916-041132.

753

91. Martinez-Medina, A.; Flors, V.; Heil, M.; Mauch-Mani, B.; Pieterse, C.M.; Pozo, M.J.;

754

Ton, J.; van Dam, N.M.; Conrath,U. Recognizing plant defense priming.

755

Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 818-822. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.009.

756

92. Beauregard, P.B.; Chai, Y.; Vlamakis, H.; Losick, R.; Kolter, R. Bacillus subtilis

757

biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 23,

758

110:E1621-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218984110.

759 760

93. Ramey, B.E.; Koutsoudis, M.; von Bodman, S.B.; Fuqua, C. Biofilm formation in

plant-microbe associations. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 602-609. 31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

761

Page 32 of 48

94. Anderson, A. J.; Miller, C. D. Catalase activity and the survival of Pseudomonas

762

putida, a root colonizer, upon treatment with peracetic acid. Can. J. Microbiol. 2001,

763

47, 222-228.

764

95. Hathroubi, S.; Mekni, M. A.; Domenico, P.; Nguyen, D.;Jacques, M.. Biofilms:

765

microbial shelters against antibiotics. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 23 ,147-156.

766

:doi:10.1089/mdr.2016.0087.

767

96. Wang D, Yu JM, Dorosky RJ, Pierson LS 3rd, Pierson EA. The phenazine 2-

768

hydroxy-phenazine-1-carboxylic acid promotes extracellular DNA release and has

769

broad transcriptomic consequences in Pseudomonas chlororaphis 30-84. PLoS

770

One. 2016, 11, e0148003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148003.

771

97. Wang, Y.; Kern, S.E.; Newman, D.K. Endogenous phenazine antibiotics promote

772

anaerobic survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa via extracellular electron transfer.J.

773

Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 365-369. doi: 10.1128/JB.01188-09.

774

98. Wang, Y.; Wilks, J.C.;Danhorn, T.; Ramos, I.; Croal, L.; Newman, D.K. Phenazine-1-

775

carboxylic acid promotes bacterial biofilm development via ferrous iron acquisition. J.

776

Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3606-3617. doi: 10.1128/JB.00396-11.

777

99. Wiens, J.R.; Vasil, A.I.; Schurr, M.J.; Vasil, M.L. Iron-regulated expression of

778

alginate production, mucoid phenotype, and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas

779

aeruginosa. MBio. 2014, 5:e01010-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01010-1.

780

100.

Hernandez, M.E.; Kappler, A.; Newman DK. Phenazines and other redox-active

781

antibiotics promote microbial mineral reduction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004,

782

70, 921-928.

783

101.

Grant, M.R.; Tymon, L.S.; Helms, G.L.; Thomashow, L.S.; Kent Keller, C.; Harsh,

784

J.B. Biofilm adaptation to iron availability in the presence of biotite and

785

consequences for chemical weathering. Geobiology. 2016, 14,588-598. doi:

786

10.1111/gbi.12187.

787

102.

Patel, N.M.; Moore, J.D.; Blackwell, H.E.; Amador-Noguez, D. Identification of

788

unanticipated and novel N-acyl L-homoserine lactones (AHLs) using a sensitive non-

789

targeted LC-MS/MS method. PLoS One. 2016, 11, e0163469.

790

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163469.

32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 33 of 48

791

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

103.

Papenfort, K.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-

792

negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 576-588. doi:

793

10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89.

794

104.

Fang, T.; Watson, J.L.; Goodman, J.; Dimkpa, C.O.; Martineau, N.; Das,

795

S.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Anderson, A.J. Does doping with aluminum alter the

796

effects of ZnO nanoparticles on the metabolism of soil pseudomonads? Microbiol.

797

Res. 2013, 168, 91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.09.001.

798 799 800

105.

Schenk, S. T.;Schikora, A. AHL-priming functions via oxylipin and salicylic acid.

Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5,784. 106.

Schikora, A.; Schenk, S. T.; Hartmann, A. Beneficial effects of bacteria-plant

801

communication based on quorum sensing molecules of the N-acyl homoserine

802

lactone group. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 90, 605-612.

803

107.

Dimkpa, C.O.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Anderson, A.J. CuO and ZnO

804

nanoparticles differently affect the secretion of fluorescent siderophores in the

805

beneficial root colonizer, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6. Nanotoxicology. 2012, 6,

806

635-42. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2011.598246.

807 808 809

108.

Visca, P.; Imperi, F.; Lamont, I.L. Pyoverdine siderophores: from biogenesis to

biosignificance. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 22-30. 109.

Braud, A.; Hannauer, M.; Mislin, G.L.A.; Schalk, I.J. The Pseudomonas

810

aeruginosa pyochelin-iron uptake pathway and its metal specificity. J. Bacteriol.

811

2009, 191, 3517–3525.

812

110.

Dimkpa, C.O.; Hansen, T.; Stewart, J.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Anderson, A.J.

813

ZnO nanoparticles and root colonization by a beneficial pseudomonad influence

814

essential metal responses in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Nanotoxicology. 2015,

815

9,271-278. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2014.900583.

816

111.

Lapouge, K.; Schubert, M.; Allain, F.H.; Haas, D. Gac/Rsm signal transduction

817

pathway of gamma-proteobacteria: from RNA recognition to regulation of social

818

behaviour. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 67, 241-253.

819

112.

Frangipani, E.; Visaggio, D.; Heeb, S.; Kaever, V.; Cámara, M.; Visca, P.; Imperi,

820

F. The Gac/Rsm and cyclic‐di‐GMP signalling networks coordinately regulate iron

821

uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 676-688. 33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

822

113.

Zähringer, F.; Lacanna, E.; Jenal, U.; Schirmer, T.; Boehm A. Structure and

823

signaling mechanism of a zinc-sensory diguanylate cyclase. Structure. 2013, 21,

824

1149-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.04.02

825

114.

Jenal, U.; Reinders. A.; Lori,C. Cyclic di-GMP; second messenger

826

extraordinaire. Nature Rev. Micro. 2017, 15, 271-278.

827

doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.190.

828

115.

Page 34 of 48

Kloepper, J. W.; Leong, J.; Teintze, M.; Schroth, M. N. Pseudomonas

829

siderophores: a mechanism explaining disease-suppressive soils. Curr. Microbiol.

830

1980, 4, 317-320.

831

116.

Scher, F. M.; Baker, R. Effect of Pseudomonas putida and a synthetic iron

832

chelator on induction of soil suppressiveness to Fusarium wilt pathogens.

833

Phytopathology. 1982, 72,1567-1573.

834

117.

Vansuyt, G.; Robin, A.; Briat, J.-F.; Curie, C.; Lemanceau, P. Iron acquisition

835

from Fe-pyoverdine by Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe In. 2007, 20:441-

836

447.

837

118.

Nagata, T.; Oobo, T.; Aozasa, O. Efficacy of a bacterial siderophore, pyoverdine,

838

to supply iron to Solanum lycopersicum plants. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013,115, 686-

839

690.

840

119.

Tomasi, N.; De Nobili, M.;Gottardi, S.; Zanin, L.; Mimmo, T.; Varanini, Z.;

841

Römheld, V.; Pinton, R.; Cesco, S. Physiological and molecular characterization of

842

Fe acquisition by tomato plants from natural Fe complexes. Biol. Fert. Soils.

843

2013,49, 187-200.

844

120.

Audenaert, K.; Pattery, T.; Cornelis, P; Höfte, M. Induction of systemic resistance

845

to Botrytis cinerea in tomato by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2: role of salicylic

846

acid, pyochelin, and pyocyanin. Mol. Plant Microbe In. 2002, 15, 1147-1156.

847 848 849

121.

Aznar, A; Dellagi, A. New insights into the role of siderophores as triggers of

plant immunity: what can we learn from animals? J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3001-3010. 122.

Aznar, A.; Chen, N. W. G.; Rigault, M.; Riache, N.; Joseph, D.; Desmaële, D.;

850

Mouille, G.; Boutet, S.; Soubigou-Taconnat, L.; Renou, J.-P. Scavenging iron: a

851

novel mechanism of plant immunity activation by microbial siderophores. Plant

852

Physiol. 2014, 164, 2167-2183. 34 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 35 of 48

853

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

123.

Dimkpa, C.O.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Johnson, W.P.; Arey, B.; Lea,

854

A.S.; Anderson, A.J. Nanospecific inhibition of pyoverdine siderophore production in

855

Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 by CuO nanoparticles. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012,

856

25,1066-1074. doi: 10.1021/tx3000285.

857

124.

Dimkpa, C.O.; Zeng, J.; McLean, J.E.; Britt, D.W.; Zhan, J.; Anderson, A.J.

858

Production of indole-3-acetic acid via the indole-3-acetamide pathway in the plant-

859

beneficial bacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is inhibited by ZnO

860

nanoparticles but enhanced by CuO nanoparticles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012,

861

78,1404-1410. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07424-11.

862

125.

Kang, B. R.; Yang, K. Y.; Cho, B. H.; Han, T. H.; Kim, I. S.; Lee, M. C.; Anderson,

863

A. J.; Kim, Y. C. Production of indole-3-acetic acid in the plant-beneficial strain

864

Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is negatively regulated by the global sensor kinase

865

GacS. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 473-476.

866

126.

Adams, J.; Wright, M.; Wagner, H.; Valiente, J.; Britt, D.; Anderson, A. Cu from

867

dissolution of CuO nanoparticles signals changes in root morphology. Plant Physiol.

868

Biochem. 2017, 110, 108-117.

869

127.

Dobbelaere, S.; Croonenborghs, A.; Thys, A.; Broek, A. V.; Vanderleyden, J.

870

Phytostimulatory effect of Azospirillum brasilense wild type and mutant strains

871

altered in IAA production on wheat. Plant Soil. 1999, 212,153-162.

872

128.

Glick, B.R.; Stearns, J.C. Making phytoremediation work better: maximizing a

873

plant’s growth potential in the midst of adversity. Int. J. Phytoremediation. 2011, 13,

874

Suppl 1:4–16. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2011.

875

129.

Rajkumar, M.; Sandhya, S.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Freitas H. Perspectives of plant-

876

associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. Biotechnology Advances.

877

2012, 30, 1562–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.

878 879 880

130.

Sinclair, S. A.; Krämer U. The zinc homeostasis network of land plants. Biochim.

Biophys. Acta. 2012, 1823(9),1553-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.016. 131.

Printz, B.; Lutts, S.; Hausman, J.F.; Sergeant, K. Copper trafficking in plants and

881

Its implication on cell wall dynamics. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 601. doi:

882

10.3389/fpls.2016.00601.

35 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

883

132.

Page 36 of 48

Nair PM, Chung IM. Study on the correlation between copper

884

oxide nanoparticles induced growth suppression and enhanced lignification in Indian

885

mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ Saf. 2015 113,302-313. doi:

886

10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.013.

887

133.

Prakash MG, Chung IM. Determination of zinc oxide nanoparticle toxicity in root

888

growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Acta Biologica Hungarica. 2016,

889

67, 286-296.

890 891 892

134.

Kopittke, P.M.; Menzies, N. W. Effect of Cu toxicity on growth of cowpea (Vigna

unguiculata). Plant and Soil. 2006, 297, 287-296. 135.

Yuan, H.M.; Xu, H.H.; Liu, W.C.; Lu, Y.T. Copper regulates primary root

893

elongation through PIN1-mediated auxin redistribution. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013,

894

54,766-778. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct030.

895 896 897 898 899

136.

Jin, C. W.; Ye, Y. Q. ; Zheng, S. J. An underground tale: contribution of microbial

activity to plant iron acquisition via ecological processes. Ann. Bot. 2014, 113,7-18. 137.

Stetter, M.G.; Benz, M.; Ludewig, U. Increased root hair density by loss of

WRKY6 in Arabidopsis thaliana. PeerJ. 2017, 5, e2891. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2891. 138.

Richard, O., Pineau, C., Loubet, S., Chalies, C., Vile, D., Marques, L.,

900

Berthomieu, P. Diversity analysis of the response to Zn within the Arabidopsis

901

thaliana species revealed low contribution of Zn translocation to Zn tolerance and a

902

new role for Zn in lateral root development. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1065–

903

1078.

904

139.

Zandonadi, D.B.; Canellas, L.P.; Facanha, A.R. Indoleacetic and humic acids

905

induce lateral root development through concerted plasmalemma and tonoplast H+

906

pumps. Planta. 2007, 225,1583–1595.

907 908 909 910 911 912

140.

Ten Tusscher, K.H.; Laskowski, M. Periodic lateral root priming, what makes it

tick. Plant Cell. 2017, pii: tpc.00638.2016. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00638. 141.

Vermeer, J.E.; Geldner, N. Lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana: a force

awakens. F1000 Prime Rep. 2015, 7, 32. doi: 10.12703/P7-32. 142.

Ma, J.F.; Goto, S.; Tamai, K.; Ichii, M. Role of root hairs and lateral roots in

silicon uptake by rice. Plant Physiol. 2001,127, 1773–1778.

36 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 37 of 48

913

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

143.

Roesch, L.F.; Fulthorpe, R.R.; Riva, A.; Casella, G.; Hadwin, A.K.; Kent, A.D.;

914

Daroub, S.H.; Camargo, F.A.; Farmerie, W.G.; Triplett, E.W. Pyrosequencing

915

enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J. 2007, 1, 283-290.

916

144.

Shade, A.; Hogan, C.S.; Klimowicz, A.K.; Linske, M.; McManus, P.S.;

917

Handelsman, J. Culturing captures members of the soil rare biosphere.

918

Environmental Microbiology. 2012, 14, 2247-2252.

919 920 921

145.

Dunfield, K.E.; Germida, J.J. Impact of genetically modified crops on soil- and

plant-associated microbial communities. J. Environ. Qual. 2004, 33, 806-815. 146.

Pérez-Jaramillo, J.E.; Mendes, R.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Impact

922

of plant domestication on rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions.

923

Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 90,635-644. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0337-7.

924

147.

Bakker, M.G.; Schlatter, D.C.; Otto-Hanson, L.; Kinkel, L.L. Diffuse symbioses:

925

roles of plant-plant, plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions in structuring

926

the soil microbiome. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23,1571-1583. doi: 10.1111/mec.12571.

927

148.

Schlatter, D.C,; Bakker, M.G.; Bradeen, J.M.; Kinkel, L.L. Plant community

928

richness and microbial interactions structure bacterial communities in soil.

929

Ecology. 2015, 96,134-142.

930

149.

McQuillan, J.S.; Infante, H.G.; Stokes, E.; Shaw, A.M. Silver nanoparticle

931

enhanced silver ion stress response in Escherichia coli K12. Nanotoxicology. 2012,

932

6, 857-866. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2011.626532.

933

150.

McManus, P., 2016, "Rhizosphere interactions between copper oxide

934

nanoparticles and wheat root exudate in a sand matrix; Influences on bioavailability

935

and uptake". Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 5058. Utah State

936

University, Logan. Utah. 84322.

937 938 939 940 941 942

151.

Yang, K.; Lin, D.; Xing, B. Interactions of humic acid with nanosized inorganic

oxides. Langmuir. 2009, 25, 3571–3576. 152.

Spark, K.M., Wells, J.D., Johnson, B.B. Characterizing trace metal adsorption on

kaolinite. Eur. J. Soil Sci.1995, 46, 633–640. 153.

Stewart, J.; Hansen, T.; McLean, J.E.; McManus, P.; Das, S.; Britt,

D.W.; Anderson, A.J.; Dimkpa, C.O. Salts affect the interaction of ZnO or CuO

37 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

943

nanoparticles with wheat. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2015, 34,2116-2125. doi:

944

10.1002/etc.3037.

945

154.

Page 38 of 48

Raliya, R.; Tarafdar ,J.C.; Biswas, P. Enhancing the mobilization of native

946

phosphorus in the mung bean rhizosphere using ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by

947

soil fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64,3111-118. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05224.

948

155.

Zahra, Z.; Arshad, M.; Rafique, R.; Mahmood, A.; Habib, A.; Qazi, I. A.; Khan, S.

949

A. Metallic nanoparticle (TiO2 and Fe3O4) application modifies rhizosphere

950

phosphorus availability and uptake by Lactuca sativa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015,

951

63, 6876-6882. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01611.

952

156.

Sebastian, A.; Nangia, A.; Prasad, M. N. Carbon-bound iron

953

oxide nanoparticles prevent calcium-induced iron deficiency in Oryza sativa L. . J.

954

Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 557-564. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04634.

955

157.

Suriyaprabha, R.; Karunakaran, G.; Kavitha,K.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Rajendran, V.;

956

Kannan, N. Application of silica nanoparticles in maize to enhance fungal resistance.

957

IET Nanobiotechnol. 2014, 8,133-137. doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2013.0004.

958

158.

Egusa, M.; Matsui, H.; Urakami, T.; Okuda, S.; Ifuku, S.; Nakagami, H.;

959

Kaminaka, H. Chitin nanofiber elucidates the elicitor activity of polymeric chitin in

960

plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015, 6,1098. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.0109.

961

159.

Anusuya, S.; Sathiyabama M. Protection of turmeric plants from rhizome rot

962

disease under field conditions by β-D-glucan nanoparticle. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

963

2015, 77:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.053.

964 965 966 967 968 969

970

971 38 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 39 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

972

973

Figure Legends

974

Fig. 1. The fertilizer potential of CuO and ZnO NPs. The essential metals, Cu and Zn,

975

are bioavailable to the plant from their metal oxide NPs through processes in the

976

rhizosphere influenced by soil properties, the root and its microbiome. Inserts show the

977

biofilm that forms over a wheat root surface by cells of a probiotic, Pseudomonas

978

chlororaphis O6; NPs are embedded within the biofilm (SEM large image). In the

979

absence of root colonization, association of CuO NPs with root hairs on the wheat

980

seedling root is revealed (light microscopy small image).

981

Fig. 2. Metal oxide NP uses in agriculture and factors that will need to be addressed to

982

optimize their efficacy in the rhizosphere for agricultural applications.

983

Fig. 3. Key rhizosphere metabolites produced by the probiotic, root colonizer,

984

Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 (PcO6). The metabolites include acyl

985

homoserine lactones (AHSLs) that are inter- and intra-cellular cross-kingdom signaling

986

compounds. In PcO6 they stimulate production of antifungal metabolites, a family of

987

phenazines that are multitasked in promoting plant health. The pyoverdine-like

988

siderophores increase rhizospheric iron bioavailability to microbe and the plant. The

989

plant growth regulator indole-3-acetic acid is produced from tryptophan by

990

(PcO6. AHSLs, phenazines and siderophores also prime plant defense

991

mechanisms. Growth on plate medium of orange-colored (PcO6 cells from the

992

biofilms coating the roots of a colonized wheat seedling is shown (large image), and on

993

medium where secreted products inhibit the radial growth of Fusarium proliferatum

39 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 40 of 48

994

mycelia (small image). Sublethal doses of CuO and/or ZnO NPs modify the production

995

of each of the shown metabolites.

996

Fig. 4. Summary of changes in PcO6 metabolism elicited by CuO and ZnO NPs.

997

The chemistry of these NPs is important because they have opposing effects on some

998

of the metabolic pathways.

999

Fig. 5. Changes in root morphology triggered by growth with CuO or ZnO NPs. The

1000

bright green fluorescence in cells revealed in the confocal images of the wheat seedling

1001

root tips have accumulated nitric oxide (NO). NO is part of the cell signaling system

1002

required for root hair formation and is detected by interaction with 4-amino-5

1003

methylamino- 2, 7, difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM DA). The white arrows denote

1004

root hairs. The distance between root cap and root hair initiation is very short for the

1005

seedlings grown with CuO NPs (green arrow). The inset image depicts the intense

1006

shortening of wheat seedling roots with growth with CuO NPs in pH 4.8 soil soluble Cu

1007

in the rhizosphere solution is heightened because dissolution is enhanced by the proton

1008

concentration. Wheat seedling growth with ZnO NPs results in increased lateral root

1009

formation.

1010

Fig. 6. The exposure of rhizosphere microbes and roots to CuO or ZnO NPs has

1011

outcomes in both the plant and root-associated microbe (PcO6). Nanoparticle-

1012

induced changes in the microbe would affect antagonism of fungal growth, plant root

1013

morphology, metal uptake into the shoots and plant responses to drought stress. Each

1014

of these responses has implications for plant health.

1015

40 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 41 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1016

1017

1018

TOC Graphic

1019 1020

Plant roots in agricultural soils are colonized with microbes, many of which enhance

1021

plant stress resilience. Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 (PcO6) (atomic

1022

force microscope image of cells) has such beneficial properties. This microbe

1023

repurposes the C and N metabolites released from plant roots producing antibiotics,

1024

metal chelators, and plant growth regulators. These rhizosphere metabolites stimulate

1025

plant wellbeing. Biofilms of the bacterial cells on the root surface provide physical

1026

protection and hydration to the root. Growth with ZnO or CuO NPs modifies lateral root

1027

or root hair production at the tips, enhancing surface area for microbial colonization. The

1028

CuO and ZnO NPs differentially alter production of the microbial interkingdom signaling

41 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 42 of 48

1029

metabolites. Thus, in addition to their ability to increase Cu and Zn levels in the plant as

1030

fertilizers, there may be other consequences of formulations containing CuO or ZnO

1031

NPs that can be tuned to benefit plant productivity in agricultural soils.

1032

42 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 43 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

338x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

338x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 44 of 48

Page 45 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

338x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

338x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 46 of 48

Page 47 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

338x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

338x190mm (96 x 96 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 48 of 48