Daily Estimation of Ground-Level PM2.5 Concentrations over Beijing

Aug 27, 2015 - ACS Editors' Choice - This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribut...
0 downloads 10 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO LIBRARIES

Article

Daily estimation of ground-level PM2.5 concentrations over Beijing using 3 km resolution MODIS AOD Yuanyu Xie, Yuxuan Wang, Kai Zhang, Wenhao Dong, Baolei Lv, and Yuqi Bai Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01413 • Publication Date (Web): 27 Aug 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 3, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

1 2 3

4

5

Environmental Science & Technology

Daily estimation of ground-level PM2.5 concentrations over Beijing using 3 km resolution MODIS AOD Yuanyu Xie1, Yuxuan Wang*1,2,3, Kai Zhang4, Wenhao Dong1, Baolei Lv1, Yuqi Bai1 1

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Center for Earth

6

7

System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 2

Department of Marine Science, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston,

8

9

TX, 77553, USA. 3

Department of Atmospheric Science, Texas A&M University, College Station,

10

11 12

TX, 77853, USA. 4

Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA;

13

14

*Corresponding Author: [email protected]

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

15

Page 2 of 35

TOC art

16

17

ABSTRACT

18

Estimating exposures to PM2.5 within urban areas requires surface PM2.5

19

concentrations at high temporal and spatial resolutions. We developed a mixed effects

20

model to derive daily estimations of surface PM2.5 levels in Beijing, using the 3 km

21

resolution satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) calibrated daily by the newly

22

available high-density surface measurements. The mixed effects model accounts for

23

daily variations of AOD-PM2.5 relationships and shows good performance in model

24

predictions (R2 of 0.81~0.83) and cross validations (R2 of 0.75~0.79). Satellite derived

25

population-weighted mean PM2.5 for Beijing was 51.2 μg/m3 over the study period

26

(Mar 2013 to Apr 2014), 46% higher than China’s annual-mean PM2.5 standard of 35

27

μg/m3. We estimated that more than 19.2 million people (98% of Beijing’s population)

28

are exposed to harmful level of long-term PM2.5 pollution. During 25% of the days

29

with model data, the population-weighted mean PM2.5 exceeded China’s daily PM2.5

30

standard of 75 μg/m3. Predicted high-resolution daily PM2.5 maps are useful to identify

31

pollution “hot spots” and estimate short- and long-term exposure. We further 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

32

demonstrated that a good calibration of the satellite data requires a relatively large

33

number of ground-level PM2.5 monitoring sites and more are still needed in Beijing.

34

Introduction

35

Particulate matter (PM) air pollution in China is a major public health problem.

36

According to the Global Burden of Disease report, ambient PM air pollution is

37

responsible for over 1.2 million premature deaths annually in China, and 50% of its

38

1.3 billion population is currently exposed to ambient PM2.5 (particulate matter with

39

aerodynamic diameters of less than 2.5 μm) in exceedance of an annual average of 35

40

μg/m3 (China’s National Ambient Air Quality Standard, or NAAQS, available at

41

http://kjs.mep.gov.cn/).1 In recent years, extremely high PM2.5 concentrations have

42

been reported over many urban areas in China, notably in Beijing. 2-5 Some of the

43

worst pollution episodes saw PM2.5 concentrations exceeding 500 μg/m3 and lasting

44

multiple days.6-7 Accurate assessment of population exposure to such elevated levels

45

of PM2.5 over densely populated urban areas requires surface PM2.5 concentrations at

46

high temporal and spatial resolutions, but ground-level monitors have been sparse in

47

China which hinders our ability to accurately assess the health impact of PM2.5

48

pollution.

49

Satellite retrievals of AOD provide larger spatial coverage and have been widely

50

employed as a proxy to infer surface PM2.5 concentrations.8-13 Early studies obtained

51

the AOD-PM2.5 relationships using simple linear regression models or chemical 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 35

52

transport models (CTM) at a global or continental scale, including the United States

53

(US) and Europe.10-11,14-17 Those studies reported R2, a measure of goodness of fit of

54

linear regression, generally between 0.3 and 0.6 and the AOD-PM2.5 relationship was

55

typically assumed to be constant in time and location.18 Advanced statistical models

56

(e.g. generalized linear model, land use regression model, geographically weighted

57

regression, and generalized additive model) have been applied in order to account for

58

variability in the AOD-PM2.5 relationships associated with meteorology or land

59

use.13,19-22 These advanced models yielded higher prediction performance (R2 at

60

0.6~0.8) for large regions such as the northeastern and southeastern US and China,

61

but the increased complexity of these models requires additional data as inputs. Lee et

62

al23 first introduced an AOD daily calibration approach using a mixed effects model

63

to account for day-to-day and location-specific variability in the AOD-PM2.5

64

relationships over New England. They demonstrated that daily adjustment of the

65

AOD-PM2.5 relationships leads to a significant improvement in model performance

66

with R2 reaching 0.92, as compared to the linear regression (R2~0.51) applied to the

67

same region. The mixed effects model provides a valuable tool for estimating PM2.5

68

concentrations in urban areas where ground monitoring sites are not of sufficient

69

density.

70

Dense surface networks and high-resolution satellite AOD data are essential for

71

improving the accuracy of exposure assessment models. Since Mar 2013, 35 PM2.5

72

monitoring sites have been deployed in Beijing Municipality by Beijing 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

73

Environmental Protection Bureau, providing hourly PM2.5 concentrations at the urban

74

and suburban areas of Beijing. In early 2014, the Moderate Resolution Imaging

75

Spectroradiometer (MODIS) team released the new collection 6 (C006) AOD

76

products at a 3 km resolution.24 Prior standard AOD products from MODIS have a

77

spatial resolution of 10 km or coarser. Most of the previous studies applying the

78

MODIS AOD to derive surface PM2.5 concentrations over China focused on the

79

regional scale with resolutions ranging from 10 km to 100 km. 12,13,22 Utilizing the

80

newly available surface monitoring data in Beijing, this study is the first attempt to

81

develop a mixed effects model to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations using

82

the 3 km resolution AOD data on a daily basis for a heavily polluted urban

83

environment in China. The severe pollution events offer a valuable opportunity to

84

assess the performance of the daily AOD calibration approach through this mixed

85

effects model. The paper is organized as follows: surface and satellite data as well as

86

model development are introduced in the “Materials and Methods” section; the model

87

performance, PM2.5 prediction results and uncertainties are provided in the “Results

88

and Discussion” section.

89 90



Materials and methods

91

Ground-level PM2.5 data. Hourly PM2.5 concentrations observed at 35 monitoring

92

stations in Beijing (Figure 1b) were obtained from Beijing Municipal Environmental

93

Monitoring Center (http://zx.bjmemc.com.cn/). Surface PM2.5 mass concentrations are 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 35

94

measured by the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) method, and the

95

measurements have undergone the calibration processes and quality controls

96

according to the environmental protection standard of China (HJ 618-2011;

97

MEPCN).25 Beijing Municipality consists of 16 districts with six urban districts

98

located in the center of the city and ten suburban districts surrounding the urban

99

regions (Figure 1c). Among the 35 PM2.5 monitors, 17 are located in the urban

100

districts and 18 in suburban districts. We averaged the surface concentrations

101

measured between 13:00 pm and 14:00 pm local time at each site to derive the daily

102

PM2.5 concentrations that match with the over-passing time of the Aqua satellite. The

103

study period is from March 26th 2013 to April 23th 2014, spanning a total of 394 days.

104

MODIS 3 km AOD products and calibration. MODIS 3 km AOD product.

105

MODIS on board the NASA Aqua satellite has been in operation since 2002,

106

providing retrieval products of aerosol and cloud properties with nearly daily global

107

coverage.26 The dark target algorithms make use of surface reflectance at three

108

wavelength channels (0.47 μm, 0.66 μm, and 2.12 μm) for AOD retrievals over land.

109

Standard MODIS Level 2 (L2) AOD products are distributed at a 10 km resolution.

110

To fulfill the need for higher resolution pollution detection, the most recently released

111

MODIS Collection 6 product (MYD04_3K) provides aerosol products at a 3 km

112

resolution in addition to the L2 10 km product. The retrieval algorithm of the higher

113

resolution product is similar to that of the 10 km standard product, but averages 6 × 6

114

pixels in a single retrieval box rather than the 20 × 20 pixels after cloud screening and 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

115

other surface mask processes. Pixels outside the reflectivity range of the brightest 50%

116

and darkest 20% at 0.66 μm are discarded to reduce uncertainty. Validation against

117

surface sun photometer shows that two thirds of the 3 km retrievals fall within the

118

expected error on a regional comparison but with a high bias of ~0.06 especially over

119

urban surface.27

120

MODIS AOD validation. The ground-based AOD measurements from three AErosol

121

RObotic NETwork (AERONET) sites (http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/) in Beijing were

122

used to validate the satellite-derived AOD. To be comparable with the spectrum

123

setting of MODIS, AERONET AOD at 550 nm were calculated by interpolating AOD

124

at 440 nm and at 675 nm using the reported angstrom exponent at the respective

125

wavelengths. The 3 km MODIS AOD products from Aqua show high temporal

126

correlations with the AERONET AOD (Pearson correlation coefficient r of 0.93, 0.93

127

and 0.94 at the three sites respectively, Text S1, Supporting Information (SI)). The

128

mean AOD difference between MODIS and AERONET at the three sites is 0.29. The

129

higher AOD from MODIS could be partly attributed to the reflectance bias over the

130

brighter surface of urban areas, which was also observed over other urban regions.

131

27

132

systematic bias when deriving the PM2.5 to AOD ratio and is not expected to influence

133

surface PM2.5 estimation in this study because we calibrated MODIS AOD with

134

ground-level PM2.5 measurements on a daily basis.

24,

Since this bias is persistent for the full range of AOD values, it can be treated as a

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 8 of 35

135

Model development and validation. We selected the site-collocated satellite AOD

136

values for each surface site where it falls within a 3 km grid. If there are more than

137

one site within a single 3 km grid, the PM2.5 values of those sites are averaged. With

138

this process, site #12 and #14 are averaged and there remain 34 pairs of AOD and

139

PM2.5 data for model development.

140 141

A linear regression model was first applied to the collocated AOD and PM2.5 datasets. The linear regression model for all the 34 sites follows the form of:

142

PM 2.5      AOD

143

Where  and  are the fixed intercept and slope, respectively. The intercept and

144

slope do not have spatial and temporal variations since the linear regression model

145

assumes that the AOD-PM2.5 relationship is constant for all the sites throughout the

146

study period. The log transformed AOD and PM2.5 were also tested, and no significant

147

improvement was found in the regression performance. Therefore, we only present

148

the regression results with the original AOD and PM2.5 datasets.

(1)

149

In reality, the AOD-PM2.5 relationship may exhibit spatial and temporal variations

150

due to changing meteorology and other factors. To represent the varying AOD-PM2.5

151

relationship, we developed a mixed effects model following the approach proposed by

152

Lee et al.23 which takes into consideration daily variations of the AOD-PM2.5

153

relationship and derives site-specific parameters for spatial adjustment. The mixed

154

effects model estimates surface PM2.5 concentrations for each site i of day j

155

( PM 2.5,ij ) from collocated MODIS AOD ( AODij ) in the form of 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

156

PM 2.5,ij  (  u j )  (   v j )  AODij  si   ij

157

(u j v j ) ~ N [(00),  ]

158

Where  and  are the fixed intercept and slope independent of time and

159

location, u j and v j are the random intercept and slope for all the sites at each day.

160

When the subscript i is not present for a parameter in Equation (2), it indicates that

161

parameter does not change by site. The random terms ( u j and v j ) reflect the

162

day-to-day variations of the AOD-PM2.5 relationship influenced by meteorology,

163

satellite retrieval conditions, etc. The si ~N (0,  s2 ) is a site term which accounts for

164

the spatial difference of the AOD-PM2.5 relationship due to differences in site specific

165

characteristics (i.e. surface reflectivity, topography, PM2.5 emissions, and pollution

166

transported to the observation sites). The comparison between the mixed effects

167

models with and without the site effect si provides a measure of the sensitivity in

168

model-derived day-to-day variations of the AOD-PM2.5 relationship to site locations.

169

 ij represents the error term, and

170

day-specific random effects. We excluded days with less than two pairs of

171

AOD-PM2.5 data and performed model predictions on the remaining available days.

172

Model performances were evaluated by comparing the predictions to ground

173

measurements using R2, mean prediction error (MPE), and root mean square error

174

(RMSE). The correlation coefficient, r, reported in this study is the Pearson

175

correlation coefficient unless stated otherwise.

(2)



is the variance-covariance matrix for the

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 10 of 35

176

A cross-validation (CV) method was implemented to test the performance of the

177

linear regression model and mixed effects model. We isolated one site at a time,

178

performed model fitting with the remaining 33 sites and validated model

179

performances on the isolated site. The process was repeated for each of the 34 sites.

180

The CV statistics are represented with R2, MPE and RMSE. We also varied the

181

number of isolated sites during cross validation to 5, 10, and 20 as a way of testing the

182

sensitivity of the mixed effects model to the density of surface monitors needed.

183 184



185

Descriptive statistics. Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics of measured PM2.5

186

concentrations at the 35 surface sites and site-collocated MODIS AOD during the

187

study period. Daily time series of the site-average PM2.5 concentrations and

188

site-collocated MODIS AOD (Figure 1a) indicate an overall good correlation between

189

them (r = 0.6). Average PM2.5 from the ground-based monitors is 81.04 μg/m3 during

190

the study period, more than a factor of 2 higher than China’s NAAQS of 35 μg/m3 for

191

annual-mean PM2.5, and the standard deviation (SD) is 73.23 μg/m3. The average

192

AOD is 0.68 with a SD of 0.49. The maximum site-average daily mean PM2.5 is

193

385.80 μg/m3 and the maximum single-site daily concentration reaches 500 μg/m3.

194

Many sites have high AOD values larger than 2.0. The data are further divided into

195

the warm season (Apr 15th to Oct 14th) and the cold season (Oct 15th to Apr 14th). The

196

average PM2.5 concentrations does not differ much between the two seasons but the

Results and discussion

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

197

AOD values is much lower in the cold season than in the warm season. Besides the

198

impact of lower planetary boundary layer (PBL) depths in the cold season as well as

199

other meteorological conditions (e.g. lower relative humidity), a lower percent of

200

available satellite AOD retrievals over snow also explains the lower mean and SD of

201

AOD in the cold season. The detailed statistics for each site and description for

202

seasonal comparisons are shown in Text S2 (SI).

203

Spatially surface PM2.5 from the ground-level monitors presents a decreasing

204

gradient from south to north due to topography and land use difference in Beijing

205

(Figure 1b). The south to north PM2.5 gradient generally demonstrates the emission

206

difference between suburban and urban regions. In addition, the southern sites are

207

more influenced by pollution transported from the cities south of Beijing, while the

208

north of Beijing is surrounded by mountains. Satellite AOD averaged for the entire

209

study period exhibits a similarly strong spatial gradient (Figure 1c), with highest

210

values over the southeast urban districts. The correlation between the period-mean

211

PM2.5 and site-collocated AOD is 0.64 across the 35 sites, indicating a relatively tight

212

spatial consistency between the two datasets.

213

Linear regression model. The linear regression model gives a regression slope of

214

58.67 and intercept of 10.08 between measured PM2.5 and site-collocated MODIS

215

AOD, with an overall R2 of 0.47 (p