Dendron–Polymer Conjugate Based Cross-Linked Micelles: A Robust

Feb 21, 2019 - Multivalency in Drug Delivery–When Is It Too Much of a Good Thing? Bioconjugate Chemistry. Tjandra, and Thordarson. 0 (0),. Abstract:...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Macquarie University

Article

Dendron-polymer Conjugate based Crosslinked Micelles: A Robust and Versatile Nanosystem for Targeted Delivery Filiz Calik, Aysun Degirmenci, Melike Eceoglu, Amitav Sanyal, and Rana Sanyal Bioconjugate Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00027 • Publication Date (Web): 21 Feb 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 22, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Dendron-polymer Conjugate based Crosslinked Micelles: A Robust and Versatile Nanosystem for Targeted Delivery

Filiz Calik,a Aysun Degirmenci,a Melike Eceoglu,a Amitav Sanyala,b and Rana Sanyal* a,b

a Department b Center

of Chemistry, Bogazici University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey

for Life Sciences and Technologies, Bogazici University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey

ABSTRACT Among various nanomedicine platforms, biodegradable polymeric micelles offer a viable approach to targeted cancer therapy. Herein, we report fabrication of core-crosslinked micelles using dendron-polymer conjugates as building blocks. Hydrophobic polyester dendrons containing peripheral alkene groups are conjugated to a hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) based copolymer bearing activated ester groups for appending an amine-containing peptide based targeting group, namely, cRGDfK. Micellar constructs assembled in aqueous media were crosslinked using a tetra-thiol molecule via the photochemical thiol-ene reaction. Crosslinked and non-crosslinked micelles were compared in terms of their critical micellar concentration, stability, drug loading and drug release characteristics. It was observed that the crosslinked micelles were stable upon excessive dilution compared to their non-crosslinked counterparts. Importantly, the amount of passive drug release in neutral pH was considerably lower for the crosslinked micellar systems. Furthermore, treatment of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with non-targeted and targeted crosslinked micelles demonstrated higher internalization of the targeted construct. In corroboration, in vitro assay revealed that drug loaded targeted micelles possessed higher cytotoxicity than the non-targeted ones. Facile fabrication of this modular platform which can carry desired therapeutic agent and be conjugated with appropriate targeting

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 30

units, along with the attributes necessary to serve as a viable drug delivery system, offers a platform with potential for addressing various challenges in the field of micellar drug delivery.

INTRODUCTION Nanoparticle based drug delivery carriers are emerging as a viable platform since they are able to address many of the challenges faced in conventional cancer therapeutics such as high toxicity and non-specificity of drug molecules toward disease cells and their short residence time in the body.1–4 Nano-therapeutic platforms have been evaluated for decades to elongate the residence time of therapeutic agents in the body, as well as reduce their systemic toxicity.5–9 A nanosystem based therapeutic, namely Doxil, which has been translated to clinic is composed of a liposomal formulation. Due to the fragile nature of liposomal constructs, investigations in recent years have focused on the evaluation of polymer based micellar structures.10,11 The enhanced stability of these polymeric nanostructures, coupled with the wide variety of possible structural and compositional variations make these promising candidates for drug delivery.12 As with most nanosized carriers, polymeric micelles benefit from preferential accumulation in tumor tissues due to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.13 Furthermore, recent advances in design and synthesis of functionalizable polymers, allow conjugation of various receptor homing groups to allow ‘active’ targeting.14-16 While micellar delivery platforms have many of the abovementioned positive attributes, several aspects still require further consideration and improvement.15 One of the main challenges is the stability of such systems upon dilution. After intravenous administration, micelles are diluted and thus encounter risk of dissociation, which would cause premature drug release before the micelles reach the target diseased tissue. Among several approaches toward further stabilization of micelles, core or shell crosslinking based strategies have been evaluated. Apart of resisting disassembly upon dilution, crosslinking of the structure may also modulate 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

the drug release profile. An ideal micellar system would exhibit a large difference in release rates under physiological condition encountered during transport versus under in acidic or redox environment of cancerous cells. Dendritic structures have been utilized as components that form the hydrophobic core to increase the stability of micellar constructs. In an amphiphilic dendron-polymer conjugate, the branched structure of hydrophobic dendrons leads to enhanced hydrophobic interactions which stabilizes the structure.17 Unfortunately, the requirement of high volume of the hydrophobic component to obtain a suitable amphiphilic balance calls for employment of high generation dendrons, unless very hydrophobic peripheral groups like aromatic ones are employed.18 While micelles may be obtained with lower generation dendrons, they usually disassemble upon dilution. In this regard, core-crosslinking of micellar structures after their assembly has been exploited as a viable strategy to address this challenge.12,19,20 Thus, we envisioned that it should be possible to employ dendron polymer conjugates with a lower generation dendron, which upon crosslinking should gain the desired stability against dilution. Herein, we report the fabrication of dendron-polymer conjugate based targeting group bearing core-crosslinked micellar structures as drug delivery vehicles (Scheme 1). The dendron polymer conjugates are obtained using Huisgen type ‘click’ reaction based coupling of an orthogonally functionalizable dendron containing an alkyne unit at the focal point and alkene functional groups at the periphery with an azide terminated hydrophilic copolymer. Polyester dendrons were chosen due to their biodegradable and hydrophobic nature.21 Hydrophilic copolymers containing amine reactive activated ester groups as side chains and azide group at chain end were obtained using controlled/living polymerization. While the chain end azide unit provides conjugation with the alkyne containing dendron, the amine reactive groups were used as handles to install cyclic peptide based targeting moieties. Obtained peptide bearing dendronpolymer conjugates were evaluated for preparation of micelles loaded with doxorubicin, a

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 30

clinically administered anticancer drug. The micellar structures were core-crosslinked with tetrathiol-based crosslinkers using the alkene groups at the periphery of dendrons using the radical thiol-ene reaction. The non-crosslinked and crosslinked micelles were compared with regard to their stability and drug release under neutral and acidic conditions. Finally, in vitro cytotoxicity and internalization studies were carried out with the best micellar candidates against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer carcinoma cells.

Scheme 1. Illustration of fabrication of drug loaded core-crosslinked targeted micelles.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Synthesis of Targeting Group Containing Polymer-Dendron Conjugate. Well defined hydrophobic dendron and hydrophilic polymeric building blocks were used for synthesis of the amphiphilic polymer-dendron conjugate. The hydrophilic copolymer segment also contained N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) activated ester groups to enable installation of the amine group bearing cyclic peptide based targeting ligand. An orthogonally functionalizable dendron was designed to enable reactions in a selective manner at its focal point for conjugation to the polymer and its periphery for subsequent micellar crosslinking. Such dual clickable dendrons allow facile access to various multi-functionalizable polymerdendron conjugates using click reactions.22–24 The hydrophobic polyester dendron was synthesized from the third generation dendron 1 containing an alkyne group at the focal point 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

and hydroxyl groups at its periphery (Scheme 2a). Deprotection of the acetonide groups of the dendrons was achieved via treatment with DOWEX, H+ yielding hydroxyl surface groups. Alkene units required for subsequent crosslinking of the micellar core was incorporated by treatment with an alkene-containing anhydride 2. The purity of the orthogonally reactive dendron 1 and 3 were confirmed using 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure S1 and S2). The azide group containing hydrophilic polymeric segment was synthesized using atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of di(ethylene glycol)methacrylate (DEGMA) and NHS-methacrylate (NHSMA) (Scheme 2b). Obtained polymer 7 was characterized for its chemical composition using 1H NMR (Figure S3); molecular weight and polydispersity using SEC (Figure S7). Number average molecular weight (Mn) for the DEGMA-co-NHSMA copolymer 7 was deduced as 3.4 kDa from SEC analysis. The incorporation of the amine reactive NHS group on the polymer chain was confirmed from the presence of proton resonance at 2.77 ppm belonging to the methylene protons of the succinimide ring in the 1H NMR spectrum.

a)

O O

OH OH

O

O O

O

OH

O

O

1

O

O

O

2

O O

O

O O

O

O

O

O O

O

3

O

O O

O

O

O

O

OH

O

O

O

OH

O

O

O

DMAP, pyridine CH2Cl2, rt

O

O

O

OH

O

O

O

O

O

OH OH

O

b)

O

O

O

O

N3

Br O

+

O +

O

O

O

N

O

O

4 O 2

Cu(I)Br PMDETA

O N3

Anisole 40 oC

O

2

5

O O

O

6

Br

/ n

O

O N

m O O

7

Scheme 2. Synthesis of (a) orthogonally reactive dendron and (b) NHS-activated hydrophilic copolymer. 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 30

To obtain the amphiphilic dendron-polymer conjugate, the two blocks were coupled using the Huisgen-type Cu(I) catalyzed alkyne-azide ‘click’ reaction (Scheme 3). After purification of the conjugate by precipitation in ether to remove the unreacted dendron, the product was analyzed using 1H NMR spectroscopy. As expected, a proton resonance at 7.70 ppm belonging to the triazole proton was observed, apart from the characteristic proton resonances from the polymer and dendron components (Figure 1 and Figure S4). Additionally, a molecular weight increase to Mn = 5900 Da upon attachment of dendron to the polymer was evident upon comparison of the SEC traces of the dendron 3, copolymer 7 and the polymer-dendron conjugate (PDC) 8 (Figure S7).

O O

O

O

O N3

O

O

O Br

/ n

O O

O

O N

O

O

O

O Cu(I)Br, PMDETA Anisole 50 oC

O

O

O

O O

O

O

O

O

O

3

O O

O

O

O

O

O

7

O

O O

O

O 2

O

O

m O

O

O

O

/ n O

O O

O

O

O

O

O O

O O

O O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O O

N N N

O

8

O

O O

O

Br m O N

O O

O 2

O

O

O O

Scheme 3. Synthesis of polymer-dendron conjugate (PDC) 8 using azide-alkyne cycloaddition.

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of polymer-dendron conjugate (PDC).

Thus obtained reactive PDC 8 was utilized for attachment of cRGDfK using DMAP as a catalyst in DMF at room temperature (Scheme 4). The residual peptide was removed through dialysis against water. Successful conjugation of the cyclic peptide onto the PDC to afford the targeting group containing construct PDC-R 11 was verified by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2 and Figure S5). Residual NHS-activated ester groups on the conjugate were treated with 1amino-2-propanol to eliminate any undesirable interaction of the activated acid in the biological media. The characteristic peaks of cRGDfK were clearly observed in the 1H NMR spectra of PDC-R. The newly formed doublets between 7.23 ppm and 7.18 ppm belong to the protons of the phenyl group in cRGDfK. Extent of peptide functionalization was deduced as ca.10% of the NHS groups, which was deemed to be sufficient since a micellar construct will possess a large number of polymeric chains, which would display multiple targeting motifs. For control experiments, a control dendron-polymer conjugate (PDC-C) devoid of any targeting peptide was prepared where all activated ester groups were converted to unreactive form by treatment with 1-amino-2-propanol (Figure S6).

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 30

O O

O

O

O

O O

O

O

O

O O

O O

O O

O

O

O

O

O

N N N

O

8

O

O

O

O

/ n O O

O O

O

Br O N

m O O

O 2

O

O

O

1) O

H N

O

O

O HN

O

O

DMAP DMF, rt

N H

9

NH O NH

2) O

NH2

O

O

HN

OH

O

NH2

NH

HO

NH2

10

O

O O

O

O

O

O O

O O

O O

O

O

O

O

O

O O

O

O

O O

N N N

O

11

O

n O

r O HN

OH

O

O

HN

O

O HN

O

H N

O NH

O

O

NH

HN

2 O

NH2

Br m-r

HN O

NH O O OH

Scheme 4. Synthesis of cRGDfK containing polymer dendron conjugate (PDC-R).

Figure 2. 1H NMR spectrum of polymer-dendron conjugate PDC-R containing peptide.

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Preparation and Characterization of Non-crosslinked and Crosslinked Micelles. Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC). CMC of the PDC-R was determined using pyrene, a hydrophobic fluorescence probe. Micelle formation above a certain concentration of the amphiphilic conjugate in aqueous media, results in an increase in the amount of solubilized pyrene, which is accompanied by an increase in the intensity of the pyrene emission peak. In addition, the maxima of the peak shifts from 334 nm to 338 nm upon micelle formation. The CMC is calculated from the intersection when extrapolating the intensity ratio I338/I334 at low and high concentration regions. Using this approach, CMC value of PDC-R and PDC-C constructs were determined as 7.47 x 10-7 M and 1.02 x 10-7 M, respectively (Figure 3 and Figure S8). The CMC values of the conjugates are close to each other since they have similar molecular weight and they both have the same hydrophobic core.

Figure 3. Pyrene excitation spectra of PDC-R based micelles. Left inset: I338/I334 vs log concentration graph to calculate CMC value.

Preparation and Characterization of Crosslinked Micelles. Stability towards severe dilution as experienced upon injection into the bloodstream is an important aspect for consideration. Stability of micellar integrity also warrants minimal drug release before reaching the target tissue. Increased stability through core crosslinking was investigated in this study. After 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 30

determination of the CMC of polymer-dendron conjugates, thiol-ene chemistry was applied to undertake core-crosslinking. A hydrophobic tetra-thiol crosslinker and a photoinitiator 2,2dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA) was utilized for crosslinking under UV irradiation (365 nm) for 30 min (Scheme 5).

Scheme 5. Synthesis of core crosslinked micelles (CL-R) from copolymer PDC-R.

The diameter of micelles assembled from PDC-R with and without encapsulation of DOX were determined using DLS. Without any drug encapsulation, it was observed that targeting group containing non-crosslinked micelles NCL-R were slightly larger in size when compared to the targeting group containing core crosslinked micelles CL-R, suggesting that crosslinking leads to decrease in their diameter (Figure 4a-e). It was also observed that drug loaded micelles possessed slightly smaller average size when compared with the empty ones (122.1 nm vs 126.6 nm). It can be postulated that this happens due to hydrophobic interactions between DOX, a hydrophobic drug, and the hydrophobic polyester dendron core. Size analysis of dry micellar constructs using TEM showed that drug loaded crosslinked micelles possessed a well-defined and slightly larger size than the non-crosslinked drug loaded micelles (Figure 4f). The average size of dry micelles from TEM were calculated as 29.8 nm and 50.4 nm for the drug loaded non-crosslinked and crosslinked micelles, respectively. As expected, the sizes of drug loaded micelles measured using DLS are larger than measured from TEM, since the

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

micelles are in their hydrated state in the former measurement. The size difference in hydrated and dry states suggests that a more collapsed structure smaller in size in the dry state is formed for the drug loaded NCL-R micelles, while the drug loaded CL-R micelles shows less compaction upon drying, perhaps due to increased rigidity of the core due to crosslinking.

Figure 4. (a-d) Size distributions of drug loaded and empty crosslinked (CL-R) and noncrosslinked (NCL-R) micelles from PDC-R, (e) comparative Z-average diameter of micelles as determined by DLS at 37 oC, and (f) TEM micrographs of drug loaded NCL-R and CL-R micelles. 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 30

In order to check the colloidal stability of these micelles, DLS measurements were taken. Each of the samples was extensively diluted using water and the change in size with respect to concentration was monitored via DLS. Although CMC value of PDC-R is 7.47x10-7 M, upon dilution micelles remained stable even at 7.47x10-10 M, which suggests that the crosslinked micelles are quite resistant to severe dilution However, as expected, the noncrosslinked micelle disintegrated into unimers below the CMC value (Figure 5a-b). Additionally, crosslinked micelles maintained their size upon exposure to 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) solution, thus suggesting that they should remain stable in biological milieu (Figure S9).

Figure 5. Stability of a) Crosslinked (CL-R) and b) Non-crosslinked (NCL-R) micelles from PDC-R against dilution as probed using DLS.

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Drug Loading into NCL-R and CL-R Micelles and Release. Drug loaded micelles were obtained by dropwise addition of distilled water to a THF solution of DOX and PDC-R under stirring at room temperature, allowing complete evaporation of the organic solvent in the dark. The DOX-loaded micelles were crosslinked as described above using a tetra-thiol and a photoinitiator DMPA under UV irradiation. The drug loading capacity was determined by fluorescence spectroscopy, using a calibration curve of the drug at five different concentrations. A slightly higher amount of drug loading capacity (DLC) was observed for the NCL-R micelles compared to the CL-R micelles (10.72 ± 0.18 vs 7.25 ± 0.19) with corresponding drug loading efficiencies (DLE) as 89.3 ± 1.5 and 60.4 ± 3.2, respectively. This can be expected due to the congestion of the micellar core after the crosslinking. In vitro release behavior of DOX from NCL-R and CL-R micelles were studied simulating extracellular environment (pH 7.4) and lysosomal environment (pH 5.4) at 37oC under sink conditions (Figure 6). As expected, the release of DOX from the carriers was observed to be pH dependent. For PDC-R micelles, DOX release was much faster and higher in acidic medium compared to release in neutral pH. Importantly, a much slower DOX release was observed from the CL-R micelles compared to NCL-R micelles at pH = 7.4 (12% vs 34% respectively at 8 h). While crosslinking of micelles decreased the overall drug release (ca. 50%), it is important to note that there was a significant decrease in the drug release at the extracellular condition (pH 7.4). Since the local drug concentration in the tissue is expected to be high upon selective accumulation, it is important that drug release from the carrier is minimum during its transportation to the tumor site. The remarkable change in the drug release profile due to core crosslinking of the micelles highlights the advantage for these systems.

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 30

Figure 6. In vitro release of DOX at pH 7.4 and 5.4 from NCL-R and CL-R micelles.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Cellular Internalization. In order to investigate the cytotoxic effect of DOX loaded polymeric micelle and targeting group-bearing micelle, in vitro cytotoxicity tests were performed using a human breast cell line, MDA-MB 231. The cells were exposed to a series of equivalent concentrations of free DOX or DOX encapsulated targeted and non-targeted micelles; drug concentration was varied between 10-4 M and 10-12 M. Cytotoxicity assays revealed that while free DOX exhibited an EC50 = 5.698 x 10-8 M, the DOX loaded non-targeted micelles (CL-C) and targeting group bearing micelles (CL-R) possessed an EC50 of 7.67 x 10-7 M and 1.305 x 10-7 M, respectively (Figure 7). As expected, the free drug was found to be more active than drug loaded polymeric micelles i.e. DOX loaded micelles exhibited lower cytotoxicity when compared with free DOX for the same drug concentration. Faster diffusion of the free DOX into the cell nuclei might be the reason for this observation. Additionally, a slightly better cytotoxic effect was observed for the targeting group bearing construct (CL-R). Only slight increase observed in the in vitro experiments after 48 h is as expected since during this time period both the constructs get sufficiently internalized and release the drug. As expected from the benign chemical 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

composition of the polymeric building blocks, the polymeric micelles formulated using PDCR, devoid of any cytotoxic agent did not show any loss of cell viability.

Figure 7. Viabilities of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with polymer (PDC-R), DOX loaded non-targeted micelle (CL-C) and DOX loaded targeted micelle (CL-R), and free drug after 48h treatment as (a) dot plot and (b) as histogram.

The intracellular localization of free DOX and DOX-loaded polymeric micelles into the breast cancer cells were investigated using fluorescence microscopy. The MDA-MB 231 cells were incubated with free DOX, DOX loaded CL-C, DOX loaded CL-R, and DOX loaded CLR along with free cRGDfV peptide as a competitive ligand. Each group demonstrated different level of internalization. After 3 h, free DOX exhibited strong fluorescence intensity in cell nuclei due to faster diffusion (Figure 8). In contrast, DOX loaded polymeric micelles showed significant fluorescence intensity in the perinuclear region rather than the cell nuclei (Figure S10). This result demonstrate that DOX loaded micelles have to diffused into the cells through endocytosis.25,26 In addition to this, fluorescence intensity showed that targeting group bearing 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 30

micelle (CL-R) showed higher internalization capacity when compared with drug loaded nontargeted CL-C micelles. On the other hand, when free cRGDfV peptide was added with CL-R, since free competitive inhibitor group blocks the integrin receptors located on the cell membrane, it inhibits the interaction of micelles with cancer cells. These results clearly demonstrate that the cRGDfK peptide as a targeting moiety on the micelles facilitates intracellular uptake of DOX loaded micelles and aid transportation of the drug into the cell, raising the intracellular drug concentration.

Figure 8. Fluorescence microscopy images of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with free DOX and DOX loaded non-targeted (CL-C) and targeted (CL-R) micelles. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 μm.

CONCLUSION In summary, polymer-dendron conjugate based crosslinked micelles containing a peptide based targeting moiety were synthesized. The polymer-dendron conjugate was synthesized by clicking an orthogonally reactive hydrophobic biodegradable polyester dendron together with an azide-terminated copolymer containing activated esters as amine reactive 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

groups. This micelle precursor was appended with an amine group containing peptide based targeting group, namely cRGDfK, to fabricate micelles for targeting cancer cells with overexpressed integrin receptors. While the dendron-polymer conjugates assembled to provide micelles with low CMC, the constructs were not stable in highly dilute conditions. To add extra stability against dilution, the alkene bearing dendritic core of these micelles were crosslinked using the photochemical radical thiol-ene reaction. These drug loaded core crosslinked and noncrosslinked micelles showed appreciable drug release under acidic conditions, although slightly higher in case of the non-crosslinked ones. Importantly, lower drug release under neutral conditions was observed for the core crosslinked micelles compared to their non-crosslinked micellar counterparts. Thus, the core crosslinking not only provides very stable micellar constructs, but also suppresses drug release in neutral environment. Treatment of MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells with non-targeted and targeted micelles demonstrated higher internalization of the targeted construct. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity assay revealed that targeted micelles possessed higher cytotoxicity than the non-targeted crosslinked micelles. Additionally, the parent polymer PDC-R based construct devoid of any drug showed no appreciable cytotoxicity. These results suggest that these dendron-polymer based micellar constructs are benign and biocompatible drug delivery vehicles. Due to the modular design of the construct, any particular drug and targeting ligand combination can be incorporated to address different types of cancerous cells. Facile fabrication of this versatile drug delivery platform suggests that the construct bears potential for further exploration as a drug delivery vehicle.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Materials. 2,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)propionic acid, Dowex X50WX2, propargyl alcohol, 4pentenoic anhydride and N,N-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) were purchased from Alfa 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 30

Aesar. Pentaerythritol tetrakis(3-mercaptopropionate), di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (DEGMA), N,N,N′,N′′,N′′-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) and copper(I)bromide

(Cu(I)Br)

were

purchased

from

Aldrich.

2,2-Dimethoxy-2-

phenylacetophenone (DMPA) was obtained from Acros. Synthesis of cRGDfK was achieved through solid phase peptide synthesis (SSPS, PS3 Peptide Synthesizer, Protein Technologies Inc., USA).27 All solvents were purchased from Merck and used as obtained without further purification unless otherwise noted. Ultrapure water was obtained using Milli-Q Water Purification System (Milli-Q system, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Azide functionalized initiator was synthesized according to literature procedures.28 N–hydroxysuccinimide methacrylate (NHSMA) monomer was synthesized using literature procedure.29 Third generation polyester dendron containing alkyne unit at the focal point was synthesized according to literature.30 Instrumentation. Chemical compositions of small molecules, dendrons and polymer were characterized using 1H NMR spectroscopy (Varian 400 MHz). Micellar formations were characterized

their

critical

micellar

concentration

and

size

using

fluorescence

spectrophotometer (Varian Cary Eclipse, Agilent, USA) and Zetasizer Nano particle analyzer (Malvern), respectively. The molecular weights of the polymers were estimated by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis using a PSS-SDV (length/ID 8 × 300 mm, 10 µm particle size) Linear M column calibrated with polystyrene (PS) standards (1–150 kDa) using a refractive-index detector. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was used as eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 30 °C. UVP Black-Ray B-100AP/R High Intensity UV lamp (100 Watt / 365 nm) was used for crosslinking experiments. During the internalization experiments, cells were visualized using Zeiss Axio Observer inverted fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss Canada Ltd, Canada). The dry micellar constructs were visualized on a holey carbon film coated 300

18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

mesh Cu-grid (Pacific Grid Tech, USA) using a LVEM5 electron microscope on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) mode (Delong Instruments, USA). Synthesis of Polyester Dendron 1. Acetal protected third-generation polyester dendron containing alkyne unit at the focal point was synthesized according to literature.30 For deprotection, a mixture of protected dendron (1.0 g, 0.97 mmol), 2 spatula tip of Dowex X50WX2 in methanol (15 mL) was heated to 40 oC and stirred for 24 h. Thereafter, Dowex was removed via filtration, followed by evaporation of methanol under reduced pressure. Crude product was dissolved in minimum amount of cold CH2Cl2 and kept at -18oC for 24h. The precipitated pure dendron was filtered and dried under vacuo to obtain a white solid (82% Yield). 1H NMR (CD3OD, δ, ppm) 4.79 (s, 2H), 4.33 - 4.26 (m, 12H), 3.67 (d, 8H, J = 12.0 Hz), 3.59 (d, 8H, J = 12 Hz), 2.99 (s, 1H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 6H), 1.15 (s, 12H) (Figure S1). Synthesis of Alkyne-containing Dendron 3. For functionalization of hydroxyl end groups of generation 3 dendron with alkene groups, dendron 1 (0.630 g, 0.73 mmol) and DMAP (0.283 g, 2.32 mmol) were added to a round bottom flask and purged with N2. Anhydrous CH2Cl2 (12.60 mL) was added to the flask, followed by pyridine (1.05 mL, 13.00 mmol) and 4pentenoic anhydride 2 (2.12 mL, 11.60 mmol). The reaction was stirred for 24 h, then water (1.05 mL) was added to the reaction flask and stirring was continued for an additional 2 h. Reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and extracted with NaHSO4 solution (1M, 3 x 30 mL), Na2CO3 solution (10 %, 3 x 30 mL) and brine solution (1 x 30 mL). Organic layer was dried by adding solid anhydrous Na2SO4 then it was filtrated. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield pure product 3 (0.810 g, 73% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm) δ 5.85 – 5.75 (m, 8H) , 5.06 – 4.98 (m, 16H), 4.73 (d, 2H, J = 2 Hz), 4.32 – 4.16 (m, 28H), 2.52 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 2.43 – 2.40 (m, 16H), 2.37 – 2.32 (m, 16H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 6H), 1.22 (s, 12H) (Figure S2).

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 30

Synthesis of DEGMA/NHSMA Copolymer 7. Cu(I)Br (0.172 g, 1.20 mmol) was weighed into a dry reaction flask (10 mL) equipped with a stir-bar. The flask was sealed and purged with N2 for 5 min. In a vial, the ligand (PMDETA) (501.0 μL, 2.40 mmol) and anisole (2 mL) were added, sealed and purged with N2 for 10 min. Then, the solution was transferred into the flask via syringe, and stirred, under N2 atmosphere until the metal catalyst dissolved. In a separate vial, NHSMA 6 (0.220 g, 1.2 mmol), DEGMA 5 (2 mL, 10.80 mmol) and anisole (5 mL) were added, sealed and purged under N2 for 10 min. Then, this solution was transferred into the flask containing catalyst complex. The reaction flask was immersed into the oil bath, allowed to stir at 40 ºC. To the vigorously stirring reaction mixture, was added azide-containing initiator 4 (272.0 μL, 1.20 mmol). The reaction was stirred at 40 ºC for 30 min. Thereafter, reaction was exposed to air to stop the polymerization, anisole was evaporated to minimum amount and the polymer was precipitated by addition to cold Et2O. After keeping the mixture in the fridge to further precipitation, ether was decanted. Obtained precipitate was dissolved in MeOH: CH2Cl2 (1:10) and passed through a short silica gel plug to remove copper salts. For further purification, product was precipitated twice in cold Et2O and dried under vacuo to yield pure copolymer (70% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm) δ 4.08 (bs, 23H), 3.65 - 3.52 (m, 70H), 3.36 (s, 34H), 2.77 (s, 6H) (Figure S3), Mn SEC=3400, Mn NMR=2730, Mw/Mn=1.31. Synthesis of Polymer-Dendron conjugate 8. In a 25 mL reaction flask, Cu(I)Br (7.9 mg, 0.055 mmol), PMDETA (11.40 μL, 0.055 mmol) were dissolved in anisole (1 mL) and purged with N2. Dendron 3 (0.123 g 0.081mmol) and copolymer 7 (0.200 g, 0.073 mmol) were weighed into a vial, then dissolved in anisole (1 mL) and purged with N2. Then, the mixture was transferred into the reaction flask and stirred at 50 ºC for 120 h. After the reaction was completed, anisole was evaporated to minimum amount and was added into cold Et2O. After keeping the mixture in the fridge for further precipitation, ether was decanted. The precipitate was dissolved in MeOH: CH2Cl2 (1:10) and passed through a short silica gel plug to remove copper salts and

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

concentrated under vacuo (54% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm) δ 7.67 (s, 1H), 5.82 - 5.72 (m, 8H), 5.23 (s,2H), 5.04 - 4.96 (m, 16H), 4.34 (t, 2H, J =16 Hz), 4.26 - 4.14 (m, 32H), 4.09 (bs, 40H) 3.66 - 3.53 (m, 143H), 3.38 (s, 70H) 2.77 (s, 10H) (Figure 1), Mn SEC=5900, Mn NMR=6812, Mw/Mn=1.20. Synthesis of cRGDfK Containing Polymer-Dendron Conjugate (PDC-R). In a 10 mL reaction flask, conjugate 8 (10.0 mg, 0.0015 mmol), cRGDfK 10 (5.4 mg, 0.009 mmol) and DMAP (12.8 mg, 0.104 mmol) were added, sealed and purged with N2. The mixture was dissolved in anhydrous DMF (0.5 mL). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 5 days. Then 1-amino-2-propanol (1.65 µL, 0.021 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture and stirred at room temperature 24 h, to convert the residual reactive groups. After evaporating DMF, residue was dissolved in water (2 mL) then acidified with HCl solution (0.1 M, 0.25 mL). Polymer containing solution was dialyzed with deionized water to remove unbound cRGDfK. The solution in dialysis bag was freeze-dried to obtain the cRGDfK containing conjugate 11 (62% yield). For fabrication of non-targeting group containing micelles for control experiments, a polymer dendron conjugate (PDC-C) was synthesized by converting all NHS-groups by treatment with 1-amino-2-propanol using the abovementioned protocol (58% yield). Micelle Formation from Polymer-Dendron Conjugate and Related Measurements. Cosolvent evaporation method was used to prepare micelle solution and measure critical micelle concentration (CMC). Briefly; various concentrations of the conjugate, ranging from 10-5 M to 10-9 M (in 3 mL water) were dissolved in 500 µL THF. Pyrene solution was added to all samples and the last concentration of pyrene was set to 6.10-7 M for each sample. Then, Milli-Q water (3 mL) was added to all samples dropwise and these mixtures were kept open to air to evaporate the organic phase. Fluorescence experiments were carried out for all samples to determine the CMC. Pyrene excitation spectra were recorded using a fluorescence spectrometer at emission

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 30

wavelength of 390 nm. The excitation fluorescence at 300 and 360 nm was monitored. The intersection of the CMC values were calculated while extrapolating the intensity ratio I338 / I334. Core Crosslinking Experiments. Polymer-dendron conjugate (PDC-R or PDC-C) (3 x 10-5 mmol) was dissolved in THF (300 µL). Concentration of copolymer was approximately 100 fold above CMC. In a separate dark vial, solution of pentaerythritol tetrakis(3mercaptopropionate) (6 x 10-5 mmol) in THF (30 µL) and solution of DMPA (2.4x10-5 mmol) in THF (10 µL) were prepared and added into the polymer solution. Then, milli-Q water (3 mL) was added dropwise. Mixture were kept open to air to evaporate the organic phase. The resulting solution was crosslinked by applying UV irradiation (365 nm) for 30 min from a distance of 10 cm. Stability Experiments. In order to check the stability of micelle, size measurement was performed using dynamic light scattering (DLS). NCL-R and CL-R micelle samples at CMC concentrations were prepared using PDC-R. Samples were diluted to CMC x 10-3. Then, size of micelles were examined using DLS. In addition, the colloidal stability of the CL-R micelles was also evaluated after 72 hours of incubation in 10% FBS solution. Encapsulation and in vitro release of DOX. DOX was loaded into micelles using co-solvent evaporation method. The amount of DOX loaded was calculated by fluorescence spectrophotometer. For determination of drug loading content, the DOX-loaded NCL-R and CL-R micelles were freeze-dried and dissolved in DMSO and the DOX content was evaluated via fluorescence measurement using DOX calibration curve. The drug-loading capacity (DLC) and efficiency (DLE) were calculated by the following equations:

DLC (wt%) = (weight of loaded drug/total weight of polymer and loaded drug) x 100% DLE (%) = (weight of loaded drug/weight of drug in feed) x 100%

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

To determine the release kinetics of DOX from CL-R and NCL-R micelles in vitro, dialysis membrane (MWCO 3500) was used under sink conditions with gentle shaking (260 rpm) at 37oC in two different buffer media. Drug loaded CL-R and NCL-R micelle solutions (1 mg/mL) were prepared by co-solvent evaporation method. These solutions were placed into dialysis bags and immersed in 20 mL of acetate buffer (pH 5.4) and phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) separately and incubated at 37 °C for 30 hours. At predetermined time points, the outer phase of dialysis membrane was removed and replenished with an equal volume of fresh release media. The amount of DOX released was determined by using fluorescence spectroscopy (excitation at 485 nm). The release experiment results presented are average data with standard deviations. In Vitro Cytotoxicity. In this study, MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells (purchased from ATCC (LGC Standards, Germany)) were used for cytotoxicity experiments. Cells were grown in RPMI medium according to manufacturer’s culture method requirements and incubated at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5 % CO2 and kept in logarithmic phase of growth throughout all experiments. The edge row and column wells of a 96-well plate was filled with distilled water (100 µL/well). The cells were seeded in rest of the wells, with a 5,000 cell/well density having medium (100 µL/well) in quadruplicates for each drug concentration.

After 24 h incubation, micelle solutions (in medium) containing DOX between 10-4 - 10-12 M, were placed onto the cells (100 µL/well). For free DOX treatment, DOX was dissolved in 1mL PBS buffer. After 48 h of incubation, CCK-8 assay was applied to determine cell 23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 24 of 30

viability. For this assay, CCK-8 solution (10 %) containing medium (60 µL/well) was applied and incubated for additional 2 h. The absorbance measurements were obtained with a plate reader (Multiscan FC, Thermo Scientific, USA) at 450 nm. Based on these absorbance values, EC50 values of different micelles and free DOX were calculated with Graph Pad Prism software by nonlinear regression analysis.

Cellular Internalization. For cellular internalization, MDA-MB-231 adenocarcinoma cells (75 000 cells/well) were seeded in 12-well plate as duplicate in culture media (1 mL). The cells were incubated at 37 oC for 24 h. Neutral doxorubicin (DOX), DOX-doped targeted and nontargeted micelles (0.04 mg/mL DOX concentration) were added onto the wells. For competitive internalization, free RGDfV was added as an inhibitor to another set of wells containing DOXdoped targeted micelles. After addition of micelles, cell media were removed at several time points (1, 3, 24 h) during incubation. Then, cells were washed with PBS (3 x 500 µL). Cells were fixed using 4 % formaldehyde solution for 10 min at 37 oC and incubated for 15 min for DAPI nuclei staining. Images of stained cells were obtained using Zeiss Observer Z1 fluorescence microscope and processed with AxioVision software.

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author *E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +90 (212) 359 4793. Author Contributions The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.

24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Grant No. 112T840) for funding this research. Authors also thank the Presidency of Republic of Turkey Directorate of Strategy and Budget (Project 2009K120520) for their contribution to the infrastructure. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Supporting Information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

REFERENCES (1) Kopeček, J. (2010) Biomaterials and drug delivery-past, present, and future. Mol. Pharm. 7, 922–925. (2) Kuzmov, A., and Minko, T. (2015) Nanotechnology approaches for inhalation treatment of lung diseases. J. Control. Release 219, 500–518. (3) Desai, N. (2012) Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics. AAPS J. 14, 282–295. (4) Brannon-Peppas, L., and Blanchette, J. O. (2012) Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64, 206–212. (5) Tong, R., and Cheng, J. (2007) Anticancer Polymeric Nanomedicines. Polym. Rev. 47, 345– 381. (6) Svenson, S., and Tomalia, D. A. (2012) Dendrimers in biomedical applications—reflections 25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 30

on the field. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64, 102–115. (7) Overchuk, M., and Zheng, G. (2018) Overcoming Obstacles in the Tumor Microenvironment: Recent Advancements in Nanoparticle Delivery for Cancer Theranostics. Biomaterials, 156, 217−237. (8) Kesharwani, P., Tekade, R. K., and Jain, N. K. (2014) Generation dependent cancer targeting potential of poly(propyleneimine) dendrimer. Biomaterials 35, 5539–48. (9) Zhang, L., Radovic-Moreno, A. F., Alexis, F., Gu, F. X., Basto, P. A, Bagalkot, V., Jon, S., Langer, R. S., and Farokhzad, O. C. (2007) Co-delivery of hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs from nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates. ChemMedChem 2, 1268–71. (10) Ishida, T., Kirchmeier, M. J., Moase, E. H., Zalipsky, S., and Allen, T. M. (2001) Targeted delivery and triggered release of liposomal doxorubicin enhances cytotoxicity against human B lymphoma cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1515, 144–58. (11) Sercombe, L., Veerati, T., Moheimani, F., Wu, S. Y., Sood, A. K., and Hua, S. (2015) Advances and challenges of liposome assisted drug delivery. Front. Pharmacol. 6, 1–13. (12) Unsal, H., Onbulak, S., Calik, F., Er-Rafik, M., Schmutz, M., Sanyal, A., and Rzayev, J. (2017) Interplay between Molecular Packing, Drug Loading, and Core Cross-Linking in Bottlebrush Copolymer Micelles. Macromolecules 50, 1342–1352. (13) Maeda, H. (2001) The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 41, 189–207. (14) Whitton, G., and Gillies, E. R. (2015) Functional aqueous assemblies of linear-dendron hybrids. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 53, 148–172. (15) Kim, S., Shi, Y., Kim, J. Y., Park, K., and Cheng, J.-X. (2010) Overcoming the barriers in 26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

micellar drug delivery: loading efficiency, in vivo stability, and micelle-cell interaction. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 7, 49–62. (16) Bolu, B. S., Sanyal, R. and Sanyal, A. (2018) Drug Delivery Systems from Self-Assembly of Dendron-Polymer Conjugates. Molecules, 23, 1570. (17) Gillies, E. R., Jonsson, T. B., and Fréchet, J. M. J. (2004) Stimuli-responsive supramolecular assemblies of linear-dendritic copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11936– 11943. (18) Sumer Bolu, B., Manavoglu Gecici, E., and Sanyal, R. (2016) Combretastatin A-4 Conjugated Antiangiogenic Micellar Drug Delivery Systems Using Dendron-Polymer Conjugates. Mol. Pharm. 13, 1482–1490. (19) Talelli, M., Barz, M., Rijcken, C. J. F., Kiessling, F., Hennink, W. E., and Lammers, T. (2015) Core-crosslinked polymeric micelles: Principles, preparation, biomedical applications and clinical translation. Nano Today 10, 93–117. (20) Sumer Bolu, B., Golba, B., Boke, N., Sanyal, A., and Sanyal, R. (2017) Designing Dendron-Polymer Conjugate Based Targeted Drug Delivery Platforms with a “Mix-andMatch” Modularity. Bioconjug. Chem. 28, 2962–2975. (21) Leiro, V., Garcia, J. P., Tomás, H., and Pêgo, A. P. (2015) The Present and the Future of Degradable Dendrimers and Derivatives in Theranostics. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 1185–1197. (22) Kose, M. M., Onbulak, S., Yilmaz, I. I., and Sanyal, A. (2011) Orthogonally “clickable” biodegradable dendrons. Macromolecules 44, 2707–2714. (23) Gok, O., Yigit, S., Kose, M., Sanyal, R., and Sanyal, A. (2013) Dendron-polymer conjugates via the diels-alder “click” reaction of novel anthracene-based dendrons. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 51, 3191–3201. 27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 30

(24) Kempe, K., Onbulak, S., Schubert, U. S., Sanyal, A., and Hoogenboom, R. (2013) pH degradable dendron-functionalized poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) prepared by a cascade “doubleclick” reaction. Polym. Chem. 4, 3236–3244. (25) Ke, X., Wee, V., Ng, L., Gao, S., Wah, Y., and Hedrick, J. L. (2014) Biomaterials Codelivery of thioridazine and doxorubicin using polymeric micelles for targeting both cancer cells and cancer stem cells. Biomaterials 35, 1096–1108. (26) Ma, G., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Sun, H., and Song, C. (2016) Doxorubicin-loaded micelles based on multiarm star-shaped PLGA – PEG block copolymers : influence of arm numbers on drug delivery. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 27, 1–15. (27) McCusker, C. F., Kocienski, P. J., Boyle, F. T., and Schätzlein, A. G. (2002) Solid-phase synthesis of c(RGDfK) derivatives: On-resin cyclisation and lysine functionalisation. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 12, 547–549. (28) Mantovani, G., Ladmiral, V., Tao, L., and Haddleton, D. M. (2005) One-pot tandem living radical polymerisation–Huisgens cycloaddition process “click” catalysed by N-alkyl-2pyridylmethanimine / Cu ( I ) Br complexes. Chem. Commun. 2089–2091. (29) Nelson, D. M., Ma, Z., Leeson, C. E., and Wagner, W. R. (2013) Extended and Sequential Delivery of Protein from Injectable thermoresponsive hydrogels. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 100, 776–785. (30) Wu, P., Malkoch, M., Hunt, J. N., Vestberg, R., Kaltgrad, E., Finn, M. G., Fokin, V. V, Sharpless, K. B., and Hawker, C. J. (2005) Multivalent, bifunctional dendrimers prepared by click chemistry. Chem. Commun. (Camb). 5775–5777.

28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Bioconjugate Chemistry

TABLE OF CONTENT GRAPHIC

29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Page 30 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment