Subscriber access provided by BALL STATE UNIV
Article
Differential Off-line LC-NMR (DOLC-NMR) Metabolomics to Monitor Tyrosine-induced Metabolome Alterations in S. cerevisiae Richard Hammerl, Oliver Frank, and Thomas Hofmann J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 05 Apr 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 6, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Differential Off-line LC-NMR (DOLC-NMR) Metabolomics
2
to Monitor Tyrosine-induced Metabolome Alterations in S.
3
cerevisiae
4 5 Richard Hammerl, Oliver Frank, and Thomas Hofmann*
6 7 8 9 1
10
Chair of Food Chemistry and Molecular Sensory Science, Technische Universität
11
München, Lise-Meitner-Str. 34, D-85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
*
19
PHONE
+49-8161-712902
20
FAX
+49-8161-712949
21
E-MAIL
To whom correspondence should be addressed
[email protected] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
29
ABSTRACT
30 31
A novel Differential Off-Line LC-NMR approach (DOLC-NMR) was developed to
32
capture and quantify nutrient-induced metabolome alterations in Saccharomyces
33
cerevisiae. Off-line coupling of HPLC separation and
34
supported by automated comparative bucket analyses, followed by quantitative 1H
35
NMR using ERETIC 2 (Electronic REference To access In vivo Concentrations) has
36
been successfully used to quantitatively record changes in the metabolome of S.
37
upon intervention with the aromatic amino acid L-tyrosine. Among the 33
38
metabolites identified, glyceryl succinate, tyrosol acetate, tyrosol lactate, tyrosol
39
succinate, and N-acyl-tyrosine derivatives like N-(1-oxooctyl)-tyrosine are reported
40
for the first time as yeast metabolites. Depending on the chain length, N-(1-
41
oxooctyl)-, N-(1-oxodecanyl)-, N-(1-oxododecanyl)-, N-(1-oxomyristinyl)-, N-(1-
42
oxopalmityl)-, and N-(1-oxooleoyl)-L-tyrosine imparted a kokumi taste enhancement
43
above their recognition thresholds ranging between 145 and 1432 µmol/L (model
44
broth). Finally, carbon module labelling (CAMOLA) and carbon bond labelling
45
(CABOLA) experiments with
46
biosynthetic pathway leading to the key metabolites, e.g. the aliphatic side chain of
47
N-(1-oxooctyl)-tyrosine could be shown to be generated via de novo fatty acid
48
biosynthesis from four C2-carbon modules (acetyl-CoA) originating from glucose.
13
1
H NMR spectroscopy
C6-glucose as the carbon source confirmed the
49 50
Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, yeast, quantitative NMR, qNMR, taste,
51
kokumi, CABOLA, CAMOLA, 13C-labelling, DOLC-NMR.
52 53 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 46
Page 3 of 46
54
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
INTRODUCTION
55 56
Due to its importance and wide application in food and beverages like bread, wine
57
and beer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one of the most studied microorganism in
58
the past 50 years. Catalyzed by post-genomic tools, enzymatic key processes are
59
well known and the impact of temperature, pH, oxygen level, and concentration of
60
salt and nutrients, respectively, on gene expression and metabolite profile have
61
been monitored by various imaging techniques.1–5 Targeted stress-induced
62
metabolome alterations enabled the identification of stress markers,6,7 salt stress
63
has been reported to induce the increase of trehalose levels to counteract osmotic
64
pressure while glucose, maltose and betaine levels depleted upon ethanol stress.6,7
65
Moreover, amino acid utilization by yeast has been reported to determine different
66
aroma and taste characteristics of fermented beverages.8 While the aliphatic
67
branched chain amino acids L-leucine, L-isoleucine, and L-valine were found to be
68
of prime importance in developing the typical aroma of S. cerevisiae fermented
69
beverages,8 the aromatic amino acid L-tyrosine are known to be metabolized via the
70
Ehrlich pathway giving rise to 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethanol, known as tyrosol.9 This
71
fusel alcohol shows high human bioavailability,10 exhibits antioxidant11 and anti-
72
tumor activity,12 and has been reported as a quorum sensing molecule showing an
73
inhibitory effect on Candida adhesion to oral tissues.13 Besides tyrosol and the
74
biogenic amine tyramine,14 other secondary metabolites from L-tyrosine are largely
75
unkown.
76
Metabolomic studies on yeast were performed either using an intracellular
77
metabolite extraction protocol with ethanol,15 or by analysing the metabolite profile
78
secreted by the microorganism during the fermentation process.5,16 Although LC-MS 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 4 of 46
79
has been frequently used for monitoring metabolite profiles due to its high resolution
80
and very low limit of detection, the unequivocal identification of key metabolites
81
increasing or decreasing upon an intervention is a rather challenging task.17 In
82
comparison, whole extract analysis by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy seems to be
83
promising as it is able to provide direct structure information as well as quantitative
84
data of previously unknown target metabolites.18–22 However, the low resolution and
85
drastic signal superimposition in one-dimensional
86
comprehensive analysis of complex natural extracts. Therefore, two different
87
approaches were followed to tackle this challenge. First, 2D-NMR experiments,
88
such
89
spectroscopy, were introduced into metabolome research to promote metabolite
90
identification on the basis of specific 1H-13C correlations recorded.7 However, the
91
incomplete transfer of the magnetization from proton to carbon lowers the suitability
92
of HSQC for accurate quantitative metabolite analysis, because the transfer step
93
may not be streamlined simultaneously for all nuclear spins in complex metabolite
94
mixtures exhibiting a range of
95
chromatographic pre-separation has been performed to de-complexify multi-
96
metabolite mixtures, such as, e.g. urine and faeces, and to increase suitability of
97
one-dimensional 1H NMR spectroscopy in metabolome research.24–26
as,
e.g.
1
H-13C
heteronuclear
1
1
H NMR spectra limits the
single-quantum
correlation
(HSQC)
H-13C coupling constants.23 Second, liquid
98
To investigate secondary metabolites from L-tyrosine in yeast, a novel
99
differential off-line HPLC-NMR approach was developed to capture metabolite
100
alterations in S. cerevisiae by comparing NMR spectral buckets that were recorded
101
from
102
intervention with the aromatic amino acid L-tyrosine. In addition, key metabolites
103
identified should be analysed in their concentrations by means of quantitative 1H
1
H NMR spectra of HPLC subfractions collected before and after an
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
104
NMR spectroscopy27 and their biosynthesis monitored by means of
13
105
experiments, namely the Carbon Module Labelling (CAMOLA)28–30 and Carbon
106
Bond Labelling (CABOLA)30–34 technique with MS- and NMR-based isotopologue
107
diagnostics, respectively.
C labelling
108 109
MATERIALS AND METHODS
110 111
Chemicals. The following chemicals were obtained commercially: Glucose,
112
caffeine, monosodium L-glutamate, L-glutathione, tannic acid, quercetin 3-O-β-D-
113
glucopyranoside,
114
phosphate monobasic, alkanoyl chlorides C4 to C 18:1, tyrosol, acetic anhydride,
115
succinic anhydride, p-hydroxyphenylethyl bromide, solketal, potassium fluoride,
116
ammonium acetate, lactic acid, dioxane, diethyl ether, N,N-dimethyl formamide,
117
ethyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran, and pyridine were from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim,
118
Germany), amino acids, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium chloride,
119
sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and formic acid were from
120
Germany), 13C6-glucose from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Andover, USA),
121
and dried baker´s yeast from RUF (Quakenbrück, Germany). Water used for the
122
yeast fermentation and chromatographic separations was purified with a Milli-Q
123
Gradient A10 system (Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany). Bottled water (Evian,
124
Danone, Wiesbaden, Germany) was used for sensory studies. Methanol,
125
acetonitrile and 2-propanol were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Deuterium
126
oxide and methanol-d4 were supplied from Euriso-Top (Gif-sur-Yvette, France).
1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic
acid,
maltodextrin,
potassium
Merck (Darmstadt,
127
S. Cerevisiae Fermentation with/without Tyrosine (Tyr1/Tyr0). Dry yeast (S.
128
cerevisiae, 460 mg of dried pellets) was mixed with water (200 mL), D-glucose (194 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 46
129
mmol/L) and L-tyrosine (12 mmol/L) were added, and the suspension was incubated
130
for 96 h at 36 °C under anaerobic conditions (Tyr1). In addition, a control experiment
131
(Tyr0) was performed without the presence of L-tyrosine. Thereafter, the
132
supernatants were separated from yeast cells by filtration (0.45 µm, Sartorius
133
Stedium Biotech GmbH; Göttingen, Germany), freeze-dried, and the residue
134
obtained
135
benzenetricarboxylic acid (100 µL, 25.0 mmol/L) as recovery standard, the solution
136
was directly used for the chromatographic MPLC separation to collect a total of 34
137
fractions in 1 min intervals. After concentration of each fraction in vacuum by means
138
of a HT-12 evaporation system (Genevac Limited Ipswich, United Kingdom), the
139
individual fractions collected from Tyr1 and Tyr0, respectively, were dissolved in
140
deuterated solvents for NMR analysis.
was
dissolved
in
water
(15
mL).
After
addition
of
1,3,5-
141
S. Cerevisiae Fermentation with Fatty Acids Added. Following the same
142
protocol as described above, the tyrosine-spiked yeast fermentation broth Tyr1 was
143
spiked with either octanoic acid (12 mmol/L), decanoic acid (12 mmol/L), or oleic
144
acid (12 mmol/L), and the pH value was adjusted to 7.0 with 0.1 mol/L aqueous
145
NaOH solution. After 96 h at 36 °C under anaerobic conditions, the supernatant was
146
obtained by filtration and then used for LC-MS/MS analyses.
147
Stable Isotope Labelling Experiments. To perform a carbon module
148
labelling (CAMOLA) experiment, a mixture of dry yeast (460 mg of dried pellets),
149
glucose (97 mmol/L), 13C6-glucose (97 mmol/L), and L-tyrosine (12 mmol/L) in water
150
(200 mL) was incubated for 96 h at 36 °C under anaerobic conditions. After
151
fermentation, the supernatant was obtained by filtration and, then, directly used for
152
UPLC-ESI-TOF/MS analysis. The obtained results were analysed with MassLynx
153
4.1 software (Waters).
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
154
For the carbon bond labelling (CABOLA) experiment, a mixture of dry yeast
155
(460 mg of dried pellets), glucose (184.3 mmol/L), 13C6-glucose (9.7 mmol/L), and L-
156
tyrosine (12 mmol/L) in water (200 mL) was incubated for 96 h at 36 °C under
157
anaerobic conditions. After filtration (0.45 µm; Sartorius Stedium Biotech GmbH,
158
Göttingen, Germany), the supernatant was extracted three times with ethyl acetate
159
(300 mL) to give an aqueous phase and an organic phase. The organic phase was
160
separated from solvent in vacuum and the residue was further fractionated using
161
the preparative HPLC system and stationary phase I. The gradient separation was
162
performed with aqueous formic acid (0.1% in water, pH 2.5) as solvent A and
163
acetonitrile as solvent B. After isocratic elution for 3 min at 2% B, the content of
164
solvent B was increased to 7% within 7 min, increased to 12% within 10 min, then
165
increased to 72% within 20 min and, finally, raised to 100% B within 5 min. The
166
aqueous phase remaining after ethyl acetate extraction of the fermentation
167
supernatant was fractionated on the preparative HPLC system using stationary
168
phase II. The gradient separation was performed with aqueous ammonium acetate
169
buffer (5mM in water, pH 3.2) as solvent A and acetonitrile/ammonium acetate
170
buffer (5mM in water, pH 3.2; 9/1, v/v) as solvent B. After isocratic elution for 1 min
171
at 100% B, the content of solvent B was decreased to 95% within 10 min, then,
172
reduced to 86% within 5 min, kept isocratically for 6 min, then reduced to 50%
173
within 3 min and, finally, kept constant for 3 min. The eluting peaks were collected
174
separately, solvents were removed in vacuum, the purified substances were taken
175
up deuterated solvent (D2O, methanol-d4) and analyzed by means of
176
spectroscopy to read out 13C coupling patterns of the isolated target compounds.
177 178
Medium
Pressure
Liquid
Chromatography
(MPLC)
13
C NMR
and
High
Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The MPLC system was comprised
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 46
179
of a Spot Prep II (Gilson, Limburg, Deutschland) equipped with a preparative 250 ×
180
21.2 mm, 5µm, PhenylHexyl Luna column (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany)
181
as the stationary phase. The effluent (21.0 mL/min) was monitored at 230 nm. The
182
gradient separation was performed with aqueous formic acid (solvent A, 0.1% in
183
water, pH 2.5) and acetonitrile (solvent B). After isocratic elution for 6 min at 2% B,
184
the content of acetonitrile was increased to 15 % B within 8 min, then, raised to 50
185
% B within 14 min and, finally, raised to 100% B within 5 min.
186
The preparative HPLC system (Jasco, Groß-Umstadt, Germany) was
187
comprised of a binary pump (PU-2087 Plus), degasser (DG 2080-53), DAD detector
188
(MD 2010 Plus), ELSD detector (Sedex LT-ELSD Model 85, Sedere, Alfortville,
189
France), and a sample loop (2000 µL). Chrompass 1.9. software was used for data
190
analyses. Chromoatography was performed either with a preparative 250 × 21.2
191
mm, 5µm, LUNA PhenylHexyl column (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany;
192
stationary phase I), or a preparative 250 × 21.2 mm, 5µm, LUNA HILIC column
193
(Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany; stationary phase II). The effluent (21.0
194
mL/min) was monitored at 230 nm.
195
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy.
1
H/13C NMR and
196
HSQC experiments of the supernatant of the fermentation broth (Figure 1) and
197
purified compounds, respectively, were performed on a Bruker AVANCE III 500
198
MHz System equipped with a cryo-TCI Probe (300 K) and Topspin 3.0 software.27
199
NMR experiments were performed after solubilizing the test samples in the following
200
NMR-buffer solution: KH2PO4 (10.2 g) was solved in D2O (40 mL), then, KOH (1.5
201
g), TMSP (50 mg), and NaN3 (5 mg) were added, the pH-value adjusted to 7.0 with
202
a KOH solution (4.0 mol/L in D2O) and, finally, made up to 50 mL with D2O.
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
203
NMR Analysis of Fractions. For NMR analysis of the MPLC fractions collected,
204
fractions no. 3-19 were dissolved in D2O (1 mL) and aliquots (540 µL) were then
205
mixed with an aliquot (60 µL) of the NMR-buffer solution prior to spectroscopy. The
206
more hydrophobic fractions no. 20-34 were taken up in CD3OD (1 mL) and aliquots
207
(600 µL) used for NMR analysis. All fraction solutions were placed in 5 mm x 7’’
208
NMR tubes (Z107374 USC tubes, Bruker, Faellanden, Switzerland) and a 1H NMR
209
spectrum was acquired using the Bruker standard water suppression 1D
210
noesygppr1d pulse sequence.35 The 90° pulse length (P1), PL9 and O1 were
211
adjusted individually on each sample and 16 scans (NS) with 4 prior dummy scans
212
(DS) were collected into 64K data points using a spectral width of 10273.97 Hz. The
213
relaxation time (T1) was set to 20 s to allow all excited nuclei to re-establish their
214
equilibrium z-magnetization prior to the application of the next pulse.27 To ensure
215
high-quality spectra, the NMR probe was manually tuned and matched to 50 Ω
216
resistive impedance to minimize radio frequency (RF) reflection, with the sample in
217
place. After automatic optimization of the lock phase, each sample was shimmed
218
(z1 − z5, xyz, z1 − z5), the 90° pulse width was determined individually for each
219
sample using the AU program pulsecal sn. All spectra were acquired without
220
spinning the sample and referenced to TMSP (0.0 ppm). The free induction decay
221
(FID) was multiplied with a 0.3 Hz exponential line-broadening factor and zero-filled
222
prior to Fourier transformation using the command apk0.noe. In case that the result
223
of the automatic phase correction was not satisfying, a careful manual zero- and
224
first-order phase correction was performed. Baseline correction was done
225
automatically with the command absn. Integration was carried out manually and
226
whenever required; adjustment of the integrals was executed by the software
227
functions SLOPE and BIAS.27
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
228
NMR Bucketing. The NMR-Buckets were calculated with the Amix Viewer
229
V3.9.13 Software (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). Each spectrum was referenced
230
to TMSP (0.0 ppm). After checking the baseline offset and using the underground
231
removal tool, the spectra were used to determine the buckets. Covering the
232
chemical shift region from -1 to 11 ppm, the range of each bucket was set to 0.1
233
ppm. The area between 4.5 and 5 ppm was excluded from bucketing due to the
234
water signal in the spectra. The calculation of the absolute integral value for each of
235
the 115 buckets was performed successfully when the signal to noise ratio was
236
larger 10. The noise was calculated in the region from 10 to 11 ppm, where no
237
signals appeared. From the yeast fermentation with tyrosine (Tyr1) and the control
238
(Tyr0), the corresponding buckets showing an integral ratio (Tyr1/Tyr0) of >2 or 2000
n.d.a
Tyrosol lactate (8)
n.d.a
> 2000
n.d.a
Tyrosol acetate (6)
n.d.a
> 2000
n.d.a
Tyrosol succinate (7)
bitter
851
n.d.a
N-(1-Oxobutyl)-L-tyrosine (10)
bitter
647
n.d.a
N-(1-Oxohexyl)-L-tyrosine (11)
bitter
343
n.d.a
N-(1-Oxooctyl)-L-tyrosine (9)
bitter
631
1432
N-(1-Oxodecanyl)-L-tyrosine (12)
bitter
627
537
N-(1-Oxododencanyl)-L-tyrosine
bitter
480
145
N-(1-Oxomyristyl)-L-tyrosine (14)
bitter
672
160
N-(1-Oxopalmityl)-L-tyrosine (15)
bitter
627
183
N-(1-Oxooleoyl)-L-tyrosine (16)
bitter
446
217
compound
784
a
not detected.
785
36 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 37 of 46
786
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 3. Results of the CAMOLA and CABOLA labelling experiments.
787 Metabolite
CAMOLA experiment
CABOLA experiment
m/z of pseudomolecular
signal
carbon atom assignment
ions ([M-1]-)
ratio
of 13C-labelled moduls
12
C-glc
12
Carbon atom
C-glc/13C-glc
[chem. shift (ppm);
(50/50) Succinic acid (2)
117
119, 121
multiplicity; 1/2JC-C (Hz)] 1:2:1
C(2,3) [28; d; 1J=55.2] C(1,4) [180; d; 1J =55.2]
Glycerol (3)
91
94
1:1
C(1,3) [62; d; 1J =39.4] C(2) [72; dd; 1J =39.4, 39.4]
Lactic acid (4)
89
92
1:1
C(1) [179; d; 1J =58.9] C(2) [67; dd; 1J =36.5, 58.9] C(3) [19; d; 1J =36.5]
Glycerol succinate (5)
191
193, 194, 195,
1:2:1:1:2:1
196, 198
C(1) [65; dd; 1J =41.5, 2J=2.7] C(2) [72; dd; 1J =41.5, 42.5] C(3) [68; dd; 1J =42.5, 2J=2.7] C(1´) [178; d; 1J =55.4] C(2´) [33; d; 1J =55.4] C(3´) [32; d; 1J =55.3] C(4´) [182; d; 1J =55.3]
37 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Tyrosol (1)
137
139, 141, 143,
1:2:2:2:1
Page 38 of 46
C(1) [66; d; 1J =37.3] C(2) [40; d; 1J =37.3]
145
C(1´) [134; d; 1J =56.8] C(2´) [133; d; 1J =56.8] C(3´) [118; ddd; 1J =65.0, 2
J=6.3, 3J=3.5]
C(4´) [157; dd; 1J =65.0, 65.0] C(5´) [118; ddd; 1J =65.0, 58.1 2
J=1.3]
C(6´) [134; ddd; 1J =58.1, 2
Tyrosol acetate (6)
179
181
1:1
J=6.0, 3J=3.5]
C(1´) [178; d; 1J =55.4] C(2´) [33; d; 1J =55.4]
Tyrosol lactate (8)
209
212
1:1
n.a.a
Tyrosol succinate
237
239, 241
1:2:1
C(1´´) [178; d; 1J =58.1] C(2´´) [34; d; 1J =58.1]
(7)
C(3´´) [33; d; 1J =55.0] C(4´´) [183; d; 1J =55.0] N-(1-Oxooctyl)-L-
306
tyrosine (9)
308, 310, 312,
1:4:6:4:1
314
C(1´´) [178; d; 1J =49.9] C(2´´) [39; d; 1J =49.9] C(3´´) [29; d; 1J =34.6] C(4´´) [30; d; 1J =34.6] C(5´´) [31; d; 1J =34.5] C(6´´) [34; d; 1J =34.5] C(7´´) [25; d; 1J =34.6] C(8´´) [16; d; 1J =34.6]
788
a
Not analyzed by 13C NMR.
789 790 791
38 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 39 of 46
792
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Hammerl et al. (Figure 1)
793 794 795
796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807
39 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
808
Hammerl et al. (Figure 2)
809 810 811
812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819
40 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 40 of 46
Page 41 of 46
820
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Hammerl et al. (Figure 3)
821 822 823
824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833
41 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
834
Hammerl et al. (Figure 4)
835 836 837 838
839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846
42 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 42 of 46
Page 43 of 46
847
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Hammerl et al. (Figure 5)
848 849 850
851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859
43 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
860
Hammerl et al. (Figure 6)
861 862 863 864 865
866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 44 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 44 of 46
Page 45 of 46
875
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Hammerl et al. (Figure 7)
876 877
878 879
45 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphic 176x115mm (150 x 150 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 46 of 46