Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia
Article
Differentiation Using Microwave Plasma Torch Desorption Mass Spectrometry of Navel Oranges Cultivated in Neighboring Habitats Wang Xinchen, Yang Meiling, Wang Zhiyuan, Hua Zhang, Guofeng Wang, Deng min, Huanwen Chen, and Luo Liping J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00553 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 12, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Differentiation Using Microwave Plasma Torch
2
Desorption Mass Spectrometry of Navel
3
Oranges Cultivated in Neighboring Habitats
4
5
Xinchen Wang,† Meiling Yang,† Zhiyuan Wang,§ Hua Zhang,† Guofeng Wang,† Min Deng,‡
6
Huanwen Chen,*,† and Liping Luo*,‡
7 8
†
Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Mass Spectrometry and Instrumentation, East China University of
9
10
11
Technology, Nanchang 330013 People’s Republic of China
‡
School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031 People’s Republic of China
§
Nanchang County the First Secondary School in Liantang, Nanchang 330046 P.R. China
12 13
*Corresponding
14
[email protected])
author
(Tel:
+86-0791-83969519;
Fax:
+86-0791-83969519;
15
16
17
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
E-mail:
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
19
Abstract: The molecular fingerprinting of intact fruit samples combined with
20
statistical data analysis can allow the assessment of fruit quality and location of origin.
21
Herein microwave plasma torch desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MPT-MS)
22
was applied to produce molecular fingerprints for the juice sac and exocarp of navel
23
oranges cultivated in three closely located habitats, and the mass spectrometric
24
fingerprints were differentiated by principal component analysis (PCA). Owing to the
25
relatively high temperature and high ionization efficiency of MPT, the volatile aroma
26
compounds and semi-volatile chemicals in the navel oranges were sensitively detected
27
and confidently identified by collision induced dissociation (CID). The limit of
28
detection (LOD) of MPT-MS for vanillin was 0.119 µg/L, with the relative standard
29
deviation (RSD, n=10) of 1.7%. The results showed that MPT-MS could be a
30
powerful analytical platform for the sensitive molecular analysis of fruits at molecular
31
level with high chemical specificity, allowing differentiation between the same sorts
32
grown in neighboring habitats.
33
Key words: Microwave plasma torch; Ambient Mass spectrometry; Desorption
34
ionization; Navel orange; Principal component analysis.
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 33
Page 3 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
35
Introduction
36
Navel orange is a common commodity of citrus containing more than 130
37
beneficial compounds with high nutritional and medicinal value to humans.1 Recent
38
studies have reported that sugars are mainly found in juice sac,1 and ketones, alkenes,
39
flavonoids, glycosides and other volatile flavor compounds are mostly contained in
40
the exocarp.2,3 Although the appearance of navel oranges from different habitats is
41
similar, the quality, nutrients and tastes could be significantly different due to the
42
difference in cultivation and planting environments, which are likely to cause the
43
molecular diversity of the active metabolites as well as the nutritional value of navel
44
oranges.
45
Currently, analytical methods such as infrared spectroscopy (IR),4,5 gas spectrometry
(GC-MS),6-8
46
chromatography-mass
47
chromatography
48
(LC-MS)12 are typically used for the quality inspection of navel oranges. These
49
methods have a high analytical power but usually require complicated and
50
time-consuming experimental procedures, which hinder high throughput sample
51
analysis. Powered by the advent of direct ionization techniques including but not
52
limited to desorption electrospray ionization (DESI),13 desorption atmospheric
53
pressure chemical ionization (DAPCI),14,15 extractive electrospray ionization (EESI)16
54
and internal extractive electrospray ionization (iEESI),17 direct analysis in real time
55
(DART),18 and microwave induced plasma (MIP),19 the speed and simplicity of mass
(HPLC),9-11
and
liquid
high
performance
chromatography-mass
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
liquid
spectrometry
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
56
spectrometric analysis have dramatically improved. In ambient MS, molecules that
57
are easily protonated/deprotonated can be sensitively detected by ambient ionization
58
techniques such as DESI, EESI and LAESI,20 which produces analyte ions in a way
59
similar to ESI. It was reported that compounds of weak polarity could be sensitively
60
detected by DAPCI,21 LTP22 and many other ionization methods based on ambient
61
corona discharge.23 However, the volatile fragrance compounds of navel oranges
62
produce similar MS fingerprints, and different kinds of navel oranges are difficult to
63
distinguish using a sensory method. Therefore, a technique with high desorption and
64
ionization energy would be of interest, since such a technique could provide rich
65
molecular information of the compounds which are unlikely to be detected by
66
commonly-available soft desorption ionization methods.
67
Microwave plasma torch (MPT),24 normally used as the excitation source for
68
optical emission spectrophotometry, was employed in analytical mass spectrometry as
69
the ionization source characterized by its relatively high temperature for easy
70
desorption and highly abundant ionic species for effective ionization. So far MPT-MS
71
has been applied to trace analysis of ambient samples in life sciences, food safety and
72
public security.25-27 In this study, MPT-MS was used to directly record the
73
characteristic MS fingerprints of the juice sac and exocarp of navel oranges. The MS
74
data were then subjected to principal component analysis (PCA),28 which resulted in
75
sensitive differentiation of navel oranges cultivated in three closely located habitats,
76
because MPT-MS provided rich molecular information of the compounds due to its
77
high desorption and ionization energy. 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 33
Page 5 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
78
Materials and Methods
79
Reagents and Materials. The microwave generator (WGY-20, 2450 MHz) and
80
microwave plasma torch tube were provided by Changchun Jilin Little Swan
81
Instruments Co. Ltd. (Changchun, China). Chemicals such as methanol (A.R. grade)
82
and standard substance such as 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, vanillin and 1-nonanol
83
were bought from Chinese Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ultra-purity
84
argon (> 99.99%) was purchased from Jiangxi Guoteng Gas Co. Ltd (Nanchang,
85
China).
86
Navel oranges (cv. 'Newhall') were collected from three closely located habitats,
87
which were geologically positioned within 3 kilometers in the naturally formed
88
farming valleys (namely Guoxi, Anxi and Fengxi) at Yongfeng Town, Xingguo
89
County, Jiangxi Province. The navel orange trees were 12 years old. The orchard
90
managements were under the same planting standard for navel oranges. And the navel
91
oranges located at the southern and upper part of the tree with similar sizes were
92
harvested on the same day. Prior to analysis, the dust on the orange surface was
93
washed off by distilled water at room temperature. The juice sac samples were cut
94
from randomly selected navel oranges, but a total of 72 exocarp samples were directly
95
sampled by the MPT around the maximal circle of the navel orange. For better
96
comparison, each piece of the juice sac (72 samples) was cut into 10×10×3mm3.
97
Experimental method. All the experiments were carried out using a LTQ-XL linear
98
Ion trap mass spectrometer (Finnigan, San Jose, CA) coupled with a microwave 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
99
plasma torch (Changchun Jilin University Little Swan Instruments Co., Ltd,
100
Changchun, China). A SC102 stepper motor (Beijing Optical Century Instrument Co.,
101
Ltd, Beijing, China) provided a mobile platform to hold the sample for analysis.
102
For MS analysis, the MPT device was slightly modified from the original
103
configuration for atomic emission spectrophotometry described elsewhere.29-32 The
104
vertical distance (h) between the sample surface and the plasma torch was 8 mm. The
105
angle (α) between of the microwave plasma torch and the sample surface was about
106
40°. The assembly of the MPT was carefully positioned to be coaxial with the ion
107
entrance capillary of the LTQ mass spectrometer, allowing a distance (d) of 10 mm
108
between the ion entrance and the MPT (Figure 1). The microwave power was 50 W.
109
The reflected microwave power was minimized to reach 0 W by adjusting the pipe
110
pistons of the microwave plasma torch. The flow rate of working gas (Ar) was 300
111
mL/min and the flow rate of the carrier gas (Ar) was 800 mL/min. The positive ion
112
detection mode was used to record the mass spectra, with the mass range of m/z
113
50-1000. The LTQ-XL instrument was operated under the following conditions: the
114
capillary temperature was 150 ℃, the capillary voltage was 16 V, the tube lens
115
voltage was 75 V, the maximum ion injection time was 100 ms. For collision induced
116
dissociation (CID) experiments, the mass-to-charge ratio window width of 1.2 Da was
117
used to isolate the precursor ions. The collision energy was 15~35%, and the collision
118
time was 30 ms. The rest of the parameters were automatically optimized by tuning
119
the LTQ-MS instrument.
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 33
Page 7 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
120
Results and Discussion
121
MPT-MS analysis of navel orange juice sac samples. The MS fingerprints of juice
122
sac samples were directly recorded using MPT-MS under the experimental conditions.
123
Figure 2 shows the mass spectra of navel orange juice sac samples, with dominant
124
peaks at m/z 127, 144, 163, 180, 198 and small peaks such as m/z 289, 325 and 342.
125
Apparently, the abundance of these peaks varied along with the juice sac samples,
126
showing the correlation between the peaks and the habitats. The peak at m/z 127 was
127
tentatively assigned to protonated 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (5-HMF), 1 (Figure 3),
128
which was favorably produced via degradation of the hexose during the heat-assisted
129
desorption ionization process.33-36 Upon CID, the precursor ion (m/z 127) yielded
130
characteristic fragments of m/z 109 and m/z 81 in the MS/MS spectrum (Figure 4A),
131
probably by successive loss of H2O and CO. In the MS3 spectrum of m/z 127, the
132
fragment ion at m/z 81 was formed by the loss of H2O and CO. The fragmentation
133
pattern was in good agreement with that generated using authentic 5-HMF,
134
confirming that the m/z 127 peak was due to 5-HMF. Note that less 5-HMF is
135
normally found in normal navel orange tissue using ESI or low temperature ionization
136
techniques (e.g., DAPCI, DESI, EESI), thus the 5-HMF was likely formed through
137
the dehydration of hexose caused by extensive heating, due to the relatively high
138
temperature of the MPT. Therefore, the intensity levels of 5-HMF (m/z 127) served as
139
the indicator of hexose, which also fluctuated along with the quality/flavor of navel
140
oranges. In comparison with the previous study of metabolites in oranges (Citrus
141
sinensis),1 the abundant peak at m/z 180 was assigned to [glucosan+NH4] +. Similarly, 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
142
the assignment of peaks at m/z 145 [glucosan-OH] +, m/z 163 [glucosan+H] +, m/z 198
143
[hexose+NH4] +, m/z 289 [2glucosan-H2O-OH] +, m/z 325 [2glucosan+H] + and m/z
144
342 [2glucosan+NH4] + were also enhanced, suggesting that the navel oranges were
145
rich in sugar.1,37 However, the relative abundance of these peaks varied notably for
146
the navel orange samples from different habitats. Such differences in sugar levels
147
could partially account for the difference in flavors.
148
Following the strategy for analyte verification, 1-nonanol (MW 144), 2 (Figure
149
3), a natural product found in navel orange, bitter orange and many other plant
150
essential oils, was also confidently detected from navel orange juice sacs. Upon CID,
151
the protonated 1-nonanol (m/z 144) generated major fragments of m/z 126, 116, 115
152
and 98 (Figure 4B), by the loss of H2O, C2H4, C2H5 and C2H6O, respectively. In the
153
MS3 spectrum of m/z 144, the fragment ion at m/z 98 was formed by the loss of H2O
154
and C2H4. The CID fragmentation pattern was validated by using authentic 1-nonanol
155
under the same experimental conditions.
156
MPT-MS analysis of navel orange exocarp samples. MPT-MS was also applied for
157
the direct fingerprinting of navel orange sample pericarp/exocarp, which minimized
158
the potential damages to the fruit, so that the navel oranges could be normally traded
159
as usual. The mass spectrometric fingerprints of exocarp from Guoxi, Anxi and
160
Fengxi are shown in Figures 5A-C, respectively, in which the main peaks at m/z 153,
161
169, 186, 353 were detected in every spectrum. However, the relative abundance for
162
these peaks fluctuated considerably, according to the sample habitats. Apparently, the 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 33
Page 9 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
163
relative abundance of the peak at m/z 353 recorded from Fengxi navel oranges
164
(570,000 counts per second (cps)) was significantly higher than those either from
165
Guoxi (265,000 cps) or from Anxi (226,000 cps) navel Orange, making the Fengxi
166
oranges outstanding from the other two. Upon CID, the protonated citrunobin, 3(m/z
167
353) produced major fragments of m/z 338, 325 and 310, by the loss of (-CH3), CO
168
and (-CH3 + CO) (Figure 6A), respectively. In comparison with the previous study of
169
metabolites in oranges (Citrus sinensis) , the abundant peak at m/z 353 was assigned
170
to be protonated citrunobin,1,38 which is a major type of involatile chalcone (flavonoid)
171
of citrus.
172
Similarly, the ion of m/z 153 was assigned to protonated vanillin. Upon CID,
173
protonated vanillin cleaved H2O and CO to yield fragments of m/z 135 and m/z 125,
174
respectively, which was consistent with the MSn result of vanillin standard obtained
175
by MPT-MS. Since vanillin is a major flavor compound in orange fruits, it was
176
quantitatively determined by using the external standard method.39 As the result, the
177
relative standard deviation (RSD) for vanillin in exocarp was 1.7%, and the limit of
178
detection (LOD) was 0.119 µg/L. Quantitative analysis of the curve is y = 177.7x-
179
5158, R² = 0.998. The content order of vanillin for the navel oranges from these three
180
habitats is Guoxi > Fengxi > Anxi.
181
Jasmine lactone (MW 168) is a natural compound providing sweet, flowery and
182
fruity flavors. In our case, the peaks at m/z 169 and 186 were detected in the full-scan
183
mass spectra of exocarp samples (Figures 5A-C). Subjection of m/z 169 to CID 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
184
resulted in formation of m/z 151, 141, 127, 109 and 95 by the loss of (H2O), (CO),
185
(COCH2-), (-CH3COOH) and (-CH3CH2COOH), respectively, which had the
186
fragmentation pattern similar to that in the GC-MS analysis of jasmine lactone.40
187
According to previous reports,41,42 the peaks at m/z 169 and 186 were the signs of
188
jasmine lactone when analyzing gardenia and fruits of citrus. Thus, the detection of
189
the peak at m/z 186 (Figures 5A-C) also indicated the existence of jasmine lactone in
190
navel orange exocarp samples. Therefore, the peak at m/z 169 was tentatively
191
identified as protonated jasmine lactone. The peak at m/z 186 was probably the
192
protonated product of jasmine lactone after hydrolysis, 4 (Figure 3). During the CID
193
process, the precursor ion (m/z 186) generated peaks at m/z 168, 158, 144, 126 and
194
112 by the loss of (H2O), (CO), (COCH2-), (-CH3COOH) and (-CH3CH2COOH)
195
(Figure 6B), respectively. Note that the ion of m/z 186 and the MS2 ion of m/z 168
196
(Figure 6B insert) may have a fragmentation pattern similar to that of protonated
197
jasmine lactone (m/z 169), although the hydrolysis might affect the fragmentation
198
pattern of the lactone. The small peak at m/z 155 was ascribed to protonated nerol or
199
geraniol, which is widespread in Rutaceae.43,44
200
More interestingly, a group of peaks at m/z 343, 373, 403, 433 corresponding to
201
polymethoxyflavones (PMFs) appeared in the spectrum (Figure 5D) when the navel
202
orange exocarp was heated by MPT for more than 30 s. The detection of PMFs were
203
confirmed by comparing the multiple-stage tandem mass spectra (Table 1) with the
204
MSn results in previous studies.45,46 It was worthy noting that few peaks were detected
205
in the low mass range accompanying the PMFs, because the small analytes with low 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 33
Page 11 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
206
mass-to-charge ratio were of high volatility and were almost evaporated before the
207
PMFs were desorbed by MPT. For reference, only a few peaks rather than the PMFs
208
at lower mass range were detected by DAPCI-MS,47 indicating that the heating
209
process facilitated by MPT was necessary for PMFs detection. More specifically, the
210
peaks at m/z 343, 373, 403, 433 corresponded to tetramethyl-o-scutellarein, 5,
211
sinensetin, 6, nobiletin, 7, and 3,5,6,7,8,3',4'-heptamethoxyflavone, 8 (Figure 3),
212
respectively.47 In the CID spectrum, their fragmentation patterns are consistent with
213
each other by the loss of 15, 30 and 61 Da, corresponding to (CH3-), (CH2O-) and
214
(2CH3O - H), respectively.47 Table 1 summarizes the CID data and signal intensity
215
levels of the PMFs. As shown in Table 1, the signal intensity levels of m/z 343, 403
216
and 433, which corresponded to 991,000 cps, 2,030,000 cps and 758,000 cps,
217
respectively, in Fengxi navel oranges were the highest among the three types of navel
218
oranges. For sinensetin (m/z 373), the signal intensity level in Fengxi navel oranges
219
was only slightly lower than that in Anxi. In general, the content of PMFs was rich in
220
Fengxi navel oranges. As the bioactive plant components in the orange peels, PMFs
221
can be used to inhibit the growth of a variety of cancer cells, mutant cells and to
222
reduce the oxygen stress of cells. Presumably, the higher content of PMFs in fruits
223
would bring more benefits to consumers. Therefore, as indicated in Table 1, level of
224
nobiletin was found to be highest in Fengxi navel oranges. The detection of PMFs
225
demonstrated that assisted by heating, MPT favored desorption/ionization of typical
226
non-volatile compounds embedded even deeply in plant tissue, which might not be
227
detectable using other ionization techniques such as DAPCI or DESI due to the lack 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
228
of heating for efficient desorption.
229
Visualization of the differences among navel oranges. The MS fingerprints of
230
navel orange juice sacs (Figure 2) and exocarp (Figure 5) showed notable differences
231
for the navel oranges cultivated in the three habitats. To easily visualize the
232
recognition, multivariate statistic tool, principal component analysis (PCA), was
233
employed to process the MS fingerprints data.48 For example, Figure 7A shows the
234
PCA score plots obtained using MPT-MS with 72 individual juice sac samples, in
235
which the samples collected from Fengxi were separated from those cultivated in
236
either Guoxi or Anxi habitat. The Anxi navel oranges were almost as uniformly
237
distributed in the 3-D PCA score plots as the Guoxi samples, showing that no
238
significant difference was detected by MPT-MS from the juice sac samples, although
239
the samples were cultivated in two habitats located in vicinity. The loading plots
240
shown in Figure 7B indicated that sugars were the major differential ingredients
241
among the navel oranges tested.
242
Similar to Figure 7A, the 72 navel oranges from Fengxi were clearly separated
243
from the rest of the samples (Figure 8A) when PCA was applied to processing the
244
MPT-MS fingerprints of navel orange exocarp samples. However, both the Guoxi
245
samples and Anxi samples were tightly clustered in Figure 8A, resulting in better
246
separation of the three types of navel orange samples. The improved differentiation
247
was achieved by the differential analytes, i.e., the major signals of citrunobin (m/z 353)
248
and hydrolysis product of jasmine lactone (m/z 186) in the loading plots (Figure 8B), 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 33
Page 13 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
249
which were quite different from those shown in Figure 7B. Overall, the exocarp
250
samples were better than the juice sacs samples for MPT-MS differential analysis of
251
navel oranges cultivated in closely located habitats, providing easy access, fast
252
analysis speed and satisfactory differentiation.
253
In conclusion, the volatile aroma compounds such as vanillin, and semi-volatile
254
chemicals such as sugars, alcohols, and anti-cancer flavonoids in the juice sacs and
255
exocarps of navel oranges were sensitively detected by microwave plasma torch
256
desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MPT-MS) followed by the statistical data
257
analysis. Fast recognition of the quality and origin of fruits produced in three closely
258
located habitats (Guoxi, Anxi and Fengxi) was successfully achieved. The
259
differentiation quality was notably improved by using MPT-MS data recorded from
260
navel orange exocarp samples rather than the juice sac samples. The data thus
261
demonstrates that MPT-MS is a sensitive analytical technique to reveal the differential
262
information at the molecular level without invasive sample manipulation and is a
263
promising method to allow distinction between the same types grown in neighboring
264
vicinities.
265
Acknowledgment
266
This work was supported by the National Key Scientific Instrument Development
267
Projects (2011YQ14015008), Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative
268
Research Team in University (PCSIRT) (No. IRT13054), International Science &
269
Technology Cooperation Program (No. 2015DFA40290). 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
270
Supporting Information
271
Tandem mass spectra of vanilln and jasmine lactone in the navel oranges by
272
MPT-MS. Tandem mass spectra of 5-HMF standard, 1-nonanol standard and vanillin
273
standard obtained by MPT-MS. Tandem mass spectra of the PMFs in the navel
274
oranges by MPT-MS. The RSD, LOD and the quantitative analysis curve of vanillin.
275
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
276
Author Information
277
*Corresponding author (Tel: +86-0791-83896370; Fax: +86-0791-83896370; E-mail:
278
[email protected])
279
References
280
1.
281
orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) wild type and bud mutant fruits by direct analysis
282
in real-time and HPLC-electrospray mass spectrometry. Metabolomics 2014, 10,
283
508-523.
284
2.
285
Papageorgiou, V. P. Analysis of antioxidant compounds in sweet orange peel by
286
HPLC–diode array detection–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Biomed.
287
Chromatogr. 2005, 19, 138-148.
288
3.
Pan, Z. Y.; Li, Y.; Deng, X. X.; Xiao, S. Y. Non-targeted metabolomic analysis of
Anagnostopoulou, M. A.; Kefalas, P.; Kokkalou, E.; Assimopoulou, A. N.;
Dharmawan, J.; Barlow, P. J.; Curran, P. Characterisation of volatile compounds 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 33
Page 15 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
289
in selected citrus fruits from Asia. Dev. Food Sci. 2006, 43, 319-322.
290
4.
291
content in navel oranges using visible-near infrared spectroscopy and variable
292
selection methods. J. Innovative Opt. Health Sci. 2014, 7, 1350065.
293
5.
294
components in a Turkish cv. Dortyol (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) orange juice. J. Sci.
295
Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1855-1862.
296
6.
297
minimal processing of orange juice by automated data analysis of volatiles and
298
nonvolatile polar compounds determined by gas chromatography coupled to mass
299
spectrometry. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 1432-1440.
300
7.
301
off-flavour compounds in orange juice by on-line coupling of a pervaporation unit to
302
gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1047, 313-317.
303
8.
304
and bad condition by gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass
305
spectrometry. Analyst 1992, 117, 721-725.
306
9.
307
analysis of amino acids in orange juice by HPLC–MS/MS for authenticity assessment.
Liu, Y. D.; Zhou, Y. R.; Pan, Y. Y. Online quantitative analysis of soluble solids
Kelebek, H.; Selli, S. Determination of volatile, phenolic, organic acid and sugar
Cerdán-Calero, M.; Izquierdo, L.; Halket, J. M.; Sentandreu, E. Evaluation of
Gómez-Ariza, J. L.; García-Barrera, T.; Lorenzo, F. Determination of flavour and
McCalley, D. V.; Torres-Grifol, J. F. Analysis of volatiles from oranges in good
Gómez-Ariza, J. L.; Villegas-Portero, M. J.; Bernal-Daza, V. Characterization and
14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
308
Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 540, 221-230.
309
10. Scherer, R.; Rybka, A. C. P.; Ballus, C. A.; Meinhart, A. D.; Teixeira Filho, J.;
310
Godoy, H. T. Validation of a HPLC method for simultaneous determination of main
311
organic acids in fruits and juices. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 150-154.
312
11. Camarda, L.; Di Stefano, V.; Del Bosco, S. F.; Schillaci, D. Antiproliferative
313
activity of citrus juices and HPLC evaluation of their flavonoid composition.
314
Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 426-429.
315
12. Hu, L.; Lei, S. R.; Guo, L. A. Determination: of citrus red 2 in navel orange by
316
ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chin. J.
317
Chromatogr. 2012, 30, 832-835.
318
13. Takáts, Z.; Wiseman, J. M.; Gologan, B.; Cooks, R. G. Mass spectrometry
319
sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science
320
2004, 306, 471-473.
321
14. Chen, H. W.; Liang, H. Z.; Ding, J. H.; Lai, J. H.; Huan, Y. F.; Qiao, X. L. Rapid
322
differentiation of tea products by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical
323
ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10093-10100.
324
15.
325
H.; Xiao, X. X. Differentiation of dried sea cucumber products from different
326
geographical areas by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization
Wu, Z. C.; Chen, H. W.; Wang, W. L.; Jia, B.; Yang, T. L.; Zhao, Z.F.; Ding, J.
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 33
Page 17 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
327
mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9356-9364.
328
16. Chen, H. W.; Yang, S. P.; Li, M.; Hu, B.; Li, J. Q.; Wang, J. Sensitive detection of
329
native proteins using extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Angew.
330
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3053-3056.
331
17.
332
Direct characterization of bulk samples by internal extractive electrospray ionization
333
mass spectrometry.Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2495.
334
18.
335
analysis of materials in open air under ambient conditions. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77,
336
2297-2302.
337
19.
338
Zhou, M. G.; Duan, Y. X. Microwave-induced plasma desorption/ionization source for
339
ambient mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85,4512-4519.
340
20. Shrestha, B.; Nemes, P.; Nazarian, J.; Hathout, Y.; Hoffman, E. P.; Vertes, A.
341
Direct analysis of lipids and small metabolites in mouse brain tissue by AP
342
IR-MALDI and reactive LAESI mass spectrometry. Analyst 2010, 135, 751-758.
343
21. Huang, X. Y.; Guo, X. L.; Luo, H. L.; Fang, X. W.; Zhu, T. G.; Zhang, X. L.;
344
Chen, H. W.; Luo, L. P. Fast differential analysis of propolis using surface desorption
345
atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Int. J. Anal. Chem.
Zhang, H.; Gu, H. W.; Yan, F. Y.; Wang, N. N.; Wei, Y. P.; Xu, J. J.; Chen, H. W.
Cody, R. B.; Laramée, J. A.; Durst, H. D. Versatile new ion source for the
Zhan, X. F.; Zhao, Z. J.; Yuan, X.; Wang, Q. H.; Li, D. D.; Xie, H.; Li, X. M.;
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
346
2015, 2015, 176475.
347
22. Garcia-reyes, J. F.; Harper, J. D.; Salazar, G. A.; Charipar, N. A.; Ouyang, Z.;
348
Cooks, R. G. Detection of explosives and related compounds by low-temperature
349
plasma ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2010, 83, 1084-1092.
350
23 Yu, Z.; Chen, L. C.; Suzuki, H.; Ariyada, O.; Erra-Balsells, R.; Nonami, H.;
351
Hiraoka, K. Direct profiling of phytochemicals in tulip tissues and in vivo monitoring
352
of the change of carbohydrate content in tulip bulbs by probe electrospray ionization
353
mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 20, 2304-2311.
354
24. Jin, Q. H.; Zhu, C.; Borer, M. W.; Hieftje, G. M. A microwave plasma torch
355
assembly for atomic emission spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 1991, 46,
356
417-430.
357
25. Wan, T. Q.; Yu, D. D.; Zhang, T. Q.; Zhang, X. W.; Zhou, J. G. A rapid method for
358
detection of gunshot residue using microwave plasma torch-mass spectrometry.
359
Procedia Eng. 2010, 7, 22-27.
360
26. Zhang, T. Q.; Zhou, W.; Jin, W.; Zhou, J. G.; Handberg, E.; Zhu, Z. Q.; Huan, W.
361
C.; Jin, Q. H. Direct desorption/ionization of analytes by microwave plasma torch for
362
ambient mass spectrometric analysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 48, 669-676.
363
27. Li, Y.; Yang, M. L.; Sun, R.; Zhong, T.; Chen, H. W. Detection of uranium in
364
industrial and mines samples by microwave plasma torch mass spectrometry. J. Mass
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 33
Page 19 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
365
Spectrom. 2016, 51, 159-164.
366
28. Zhu, L.; Yan, J. P.; Zhu, Z. Q.; Ouyang, Y. Z.; Zhang, X. L.; Zhang, W. J.; Dai, X.
367
M.; Luo, L. P.; Chen, H. W. Differential analysis of camphor wood products by
368
desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric.
369
Food Chem. 2013, 61, 547-552.
370
29. Duan, Y. X.; Du, X. G.; Jin, Q. H. Comparative studies of surfatron and
371
microwave plasma torch sources for determination of mercury by atomic emission
372
spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1994, 9, 629-633.
373
30. Yang, W. J.; Zhang, H. Q.; Yu, A. M.; Jin, Q. H. Microwave plasma torch
374
analytical atomic spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2000, 66, 147-170.
375
31. Liang, F.; Zhang, D. I.; Lei, Y. H.; Zhang, H. Q.; Jin, Q. H. Determination of
376
selected noble metals by MPT-AES using a pneumatic nebulizer. Microchem. J. 1995,
377
52, 181-187.
378
32. Gong, Z.; Chan, W. F.; Wang, X.; Lee, F. S.-C. Determination of arsenic and
379
antimony by microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometry coupled with hydride
380
generation and a PTFE membrane separator. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 450, 207-214.
381
33. Rajchl, A.; Drgová, L.; Grégrová, A.; Čížková, H.; Ševčík, R.; Voldřich, M. Rapid
382
determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by DART ionization with time-of-flight
383
mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 4737-4745.
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
384
34. Zakrzewska, M. E.; Bogel-Łukasik, E.; Bogel-Łukasik, R. Ionic liquid-mediated
385
formation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural-A promising biomass-derived building block.
386
Chem. Rev. 2010, 111, 397-417.
387
35. Román-Leshkov, Y.; Chheda, J. N.; Dumesic, J. A. Phase modifiers promote
388
efficient production of hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose. Science, 2006, 312,
389
1933-1937.
390
36. Chheda, J. N.; Román-Leshkov, Y.; Dumesic, J. A. Production of
391
5-hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural by dehydration of biomass-derived mono-and
392
poly-saccharides. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 342-350.
393
37. Chernetsova, E. S.; Morlock, G. E. Assessing the capabilities of direct analysis in
394
real time mass spectrometry for 5-hydroxymethylfurfural quantitation in honey. Int. J.
395
Mass Spectrom. 2012, 314, 22-32.
396
38. Wu, T. S. Flavonoids from root bark of Citrus sinensis and C.nobilis.
397
Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 3558-3560.
398
39.
399
a freshly reconstituted orange juice from concentrate. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009,
400
229, 611-622.
401
40. Casilli, A.; Decorzant, E.; Jaquier, A.; Delort, E. Multidimensional gas
402
chromatography hyphenated to mass spectrometry and olfactometry for the volatile
Averbeck, M.; Schieberle, P. H. Characterisation of the key aroma compounds in
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 33
Page 21 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
403
analysis of citrus hybrid peel extract, J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1373, 169-178.
404
41. Liang, H. Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S. X.; Shao, Z. Corona discharge atmospheric
405
pressure ionization mass spectrometry for real time gas analysis, Chinese J. Anal.
406
Chem. 2008, 36, 1152-1156.
407
42. Delort, E.; Casilli, A.; Decorzant, E.; Jaquier, A. Identification of new volatile
408
compounds in the Citrus Hybrid Mandarinquat ‘Indio’, Acta Hortic. 2015, 1065,
409
293-303.
410
43.
411
M. Anti-inflammatory, insecticidal and antimicrobial activities and chemical
412
composition of the essential oils of different plant organs from navel orange (Citrus
413
sinensis L.) Osbeck var. Malesy) grown in Egypt. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7,
414
1204-1215.
415
44. Kelebek, H.; Selli, S. Determination of volatile, phenolic, organic acid and sugar
416
components in a Turkish cv. Dortyol (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) orange juice. J. Sci.
417
Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1855-1862.
418
45. Winkel-Shirley, B. It takes a garden. how work on diverse plant species has
419
contributed to an understanding of flavonoid metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127,
420
1399-1404.
421
46. Ye, X. L.; Cao, D.; Zhao, X.; Song, F. Y.; Huang, Q. H.; Fan, G. R.; Wu, F. H.
Hamdan, D. I.; Mohamed, M. E.; Abdulla, R. H.; Mohamed, S. M.; El-Shazly, A.
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
422
Chemical fingerprint and metabolic profile analysis of Citrus reticulate 'Chachi'
423
decoction by HPLC-PDA-IT-MS n and HPLC-Quadrupole-Orbitrap-MS method. J.
424
Chromatogr. B 2014, 970, 108-120.
425
47. Fang, X. W.; Zhong, T.; Yao, G. C.; Gao, X.; Yang, M. L.; Li, H.; Le, Z. G.; Zhang,
426
X. L. Comparison of ambient temperature and thermal surface desorption atmospheric
427
pressure chemical ionization mass spectra for the pericarp of navel orange, Chin. J.
428
Appl. Chem. 2015, 32, 1201-1207
429
48. Chen, H. W.; Sun, Y. P.; Wortmann, A.; Gu, H. W.; Zenobi, R. Differentiation of
430
maturity and quality of fruit using noninvasive extractive electrospray ionization
431
quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 1447-1455.
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 33
Page 23 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
440
Figure Captions
441
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of microwave plasma torch mass spectrometry for
442
navel orange analysis.
443
Figure 2. Fingerprint spectra of navel orange juice sac from three origins. (A) Guoxi;
444
(B) Anxi; (C) Fengxi.
445
Figure 3. Chemical structures of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, 1, 1-nonanol, 2, citrunobin,
446
3, hydrolysis product of jasmine lactone, 4, tetramethyl-O-scutellarein, 5, sinensetin, 6,
447
nobiletin, 7, 3,5,6,7,8,3',4'-heptamethoxyflavone, 8.
448
Figure 4. MSn spectra of main substances of navel orange. (A) 5-HMF (insert: MS3
449
spectrum of m/z 127); (B) 1-nonanol (insert: MS3 spectrum of m/z 144).
450
Figure 5. Fingerprint spectra of navel orange exocarp from three habitats. (A) Guoxi;
451
(B) Anxi; (C) Fengxi; (D) Fengxi exocarp heated for more than 30 s.
452
Figure 6. MS2 spectra of main substance of navel orange. (A) Citrunobin (insert: MS3
453
spectrum of m/z 353); (B) Hydrolysis product of jasmine lactone (insert: MS3
454
spectrum of m/z 186).
455
Figure 7. PCA score results of navel orange juice sac composition. (A) 3D-PCA score
456
plot; (B) PCA loading plots.
457
Figure 8. PCA score results of navel orange exocarp composition. (A) 3D-PCA score
458
plot; (B) PCA loading plots 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 24 of 33
Table Table 1. The Polymethoxyflavones Fragments and Signal Intensity Levels of Navel Orange Exocarp Samples Structure
Intensity
Main Name
m/z
number
fragments
Guoxi
Anxi
Fengxi
964,000
935,000
991,000
1,500,000
1,840,000
1,830,000
1,500,000
1,860,000
2,030,000
528,000
696,000
758,000
4,490,000
5,330,000
5,600,000
328, 313, 5
tetramethyl-O-scutellarein
343 299, 282 358, 343,
6
sinensetin
373 329, 312 388, 373,
7
nobiletin
403
355, 342, 327 418, 403,
3,5,6,7,8,3',4'433
8
385, 372,
heptamethoxyflavone 342 Total ——
——
——
/intensity
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure graphics Figure 1
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 33
Page 27 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 33
Page 29 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 6
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 33
Page 31 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 7
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 8
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 33
Page 33 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table of Contents Graphic
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment