This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
Article Cite This: ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf
Direct Functionalization of C(sp2)−H Bond in Nonaromatic Azaheterocycles: Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling (CDC) of 2H‑Imidazole 1‑Oxides with Pyrroles and Thiophenes Alexey A. Akulov,† Mikhail V. Varaksin,†,‡ Valery N. Charushin,†,‡ and Oleg N. Chupakhin*,†,‡ †
Department of Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Ural Federal University, 19 Mira Street, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia Institute of Organic Synthesis, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 22 S. Kovalevskaya Street, 620041 Ekaterinburg, Russia
Downloaded via 95.181.217.217 on January 10, 2019 at 13:53:23 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
‡
S Supporting Information *
ABSTRACT: The C(sp2)−H bond functionalization methodology was first applied to carry out the palladium-catalyzed oxidative C−H/C−H coupling reactions of 2H-imidazole 1oxides with pyrroles and thiophenes. As a result, a number of novel 5-heteroarylated 2H-imidazole 1-oxides, which are of particular interest in the design of bioactive molecules and advanced materials, have been synthesized in yields up to 78%. The detailed H/D-exchange experiments have also been performed to elucidate some mechanistic features of this crossdehydrogenative coupling process.
■
INTRODUCTION Many organic compounds bearing the N-oxide structural motif are known as promising building blocks in the design of advanced materials, agrochemicals, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals.1 The prevalence of the N-oxide scaffold in prospective organic compounds seems to be associated with the specific changes in properties of heterocyclic N-oxides relative to their parent compounds.2 Currently, this distinguishing feature of the N+−O− motif is often used in retrosynthetic schemes as an elegant tool to induce the desired physical and chemical properties, as well as pharmacological activities and other beneficial outcomes for the target compounds. In addition, the N-oxide function is generally considered as one of the privileged scaffolds in the structures of both intermediates and final products exhibiting a variety of therapeutic effects, such as antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer, antiprotozoal, antifungal, neuroprotective, and other activities.3 Among the known biologically active and medicinally important compounds bearing the N-oxide function, derivatives in which the −CN+−O− pharmacophore fragment is partly involved in a (hetero)aromatic ring (Figure 1) attract special attention. For instance, chlordiazepoxide I is a sedative and hypnotic medication of the benzodiazepine family, which is commonly used for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, and to withdraw symptoms from alcohol and/or drug abuse.4 1,7Naphthyridine N-oxide II, the p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, is considered to be an efficient agent for therapy of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.5 Indoline derivative III shows neuroprotective spin-trapping properties and prevents cell death under oxidative stress conditions.3j Furoxane IV, being a good nitric oxide donor, proved to possess an increased procognitive activity and cytotoxicity.6 © 2019 American Chemical Society
2,2′-Pyridylisatogen V is a good antioxidant agent with neuroprotective activity.7 It is worth noting that an overwhelming majority of practically interested organic compounds have turned out to be bi- and/or polyfunctional derivatives in which the structural subunits are linked to each other through the carbon−carbon bonds.8 In this respect, one of the key challenges for modern organic synthesis is the development of simple and convenient approaches to obtain the target organic ensembles containing various functional building blocks through the construction of the C−C bonds.9 The effectiveness and expediency of the methods used can be easily assessed, taking into account the compliance of the latter with the basic principles of green chemistry, such as atom and step economy.10 Currently, the green chemistry-oriented C−H functionalization methodology,11,12 which allows one to convert C(sp2)−H bonds of the starting materials into C−C bonds of the target products without any preliminary functionalization of the reactive partners, is considered to be a useful synthetic tool because it provides the environmental-friendly solutions in the design of bi- and/or polyfunctional organic compounds of various architectures. One of the most promising approaches based on the C(sp2)−H functionalization methodology suggests using the transition-metal-catalyzed oxidative C−H/C−H coupling reactions between (hetero)arenes.8a,b,12 These industrially important processes, being atom- and stage-efficient alternative to both C−X/C−Y and C−H/C−X(Y) coupling strategies [X Received: October 26, 2018 Accepted: December 26, 2018 Published: January 10, 2019 825
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
Figure 1. Prospective N-oxide-based pharmaceuticals and drug candidates.
= (pseudo)halide, Y = metal], are actively used to functionalize aromatic and heteroaromatic (π-excessive and π-deficient) compounds, including azine N-oxides and other azineactivated forms. At the same time, the number of C−H/C− H coupling reactions studied in the chemistry of nonaromatic nitrogen-containing compounds has still rather been limited. Indeed, a few examples of the direct C−H functionalization of cyclic aldonitrones lacking an aromatic π-conjugated system are presented by the following reactions of 2H-imidazole 1oxides: uncatalyzed by transition metals (i) oxidative C−H/ C−Li coupling with organometallics,13 (ii) metalation followed by coupling with electrophiles,14 (iii) eliminative C−H/C−H coupling with azoles,15 and (iv) Pd(II)-catalyzed oxidative C− H/C−H coupling with indoles.15b It should be noted that in case of oxidative reactions (i, ii, and iv), the retention of the Noxide group in the coupling products is observed, whereas the eliminative process (iii) has been shown to result in the formation of 2H-imidazoles with the loss of the N-oxide function. This study is aimed at the development of a facile and effective synthetic approach for the direct C(sp2)−H bond functionalization of cyclic aldonitrones with fragments of pyrroles and thiophenes to obtain novel heterocyclic ensembles, 5-heteroaryl-substituted 2H-imidazole 1-oxides, in good yields.
■
A special attention has been focused on the conditions optimization for these cross-coupling reactions by varying the basic parameters, such as molar ratio of the coupling partners 1 and 2, amounts of catalyst Pd(OAc)2 and oxidant Cu(OAc)2, and the reaction time. Initially, the conditions that had earlier been used for the direct C−H/C−H coupling of aldonitrones with indoles were checked.15b,16 The interaction of aldonitrone 1b with thiophene 2b proceeding in 1,4-dioxane at 120 °C in the presence of pyridine was chosen as the model reaction (Table 2). As a result of these experiments, the best yield (75%) of the coupling product 3g, 5-(5-acetylthiophen-2-yl)-2ethyl-2-methyl-4-phenyl-2H-imidazole 1-oxide, has been achieved after 24 h with the following ratio of reagents (Table 2, entry 9): 2H-imidazole 1b (1 mmol), thiophene 2b (2 mmol), palladium (0.1 mmol) and copper (1.5 mmol) acetates. In accordance with the modern concept for transition-metalcatalyzed cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) reactions,17 the oxidative C−H/C−H coupling of 2H-imidazole 1-oxides with π-excessive heterocyclic compounds, such as pyrroles or thiophenes, seems to be a cyclic redox process. The organopalladium intermediates bearing the C−Pd bond are supposed to be formed, and the cyclic redox transformations of palladium catalyst Pd(II) → Pd(0) → Pd(II) take place in this case. It should also be mentioned that the data of mechanistic studies on these transition-metal-catalyzed cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions suggest two plausible ways for palladium-induced activation of the C−H bond in (hetero)arenes, namely, electrophilic aromatic metalation and concerted metalation−deprotonation pathways.18 To gain insight into the CDC reaction mechanism and elucidate the competiveness for palladation of the reactive partners, the H/D exchange experiments have been performed (Scheme 1) using NMR spectroscopy. Herein, the previously described experimental protocol19 has been applied to perform a series of experiments separately with 2H-imidazole 1-oxide 1a and 2-acetylthiophene 2b by using the standard conditions: Pd(OAc)2, 0.1 mmol; Cu(OAc)2·H2O, 1.5 mmol; 1,4-dioxane, 5 mL; heating at 110−120 °C for 24 h, and D2O, 20 mmol, as
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The methodology for the direct nucleophilic C(sp2)−H bond functionalization in the series of nonaromatic 2H-imidazole 1oxides 1 has first been used as the main synthetic strategy to the family of novel C(5)-modified 2H-imidazole derivatives. In particular, the Pd(II)-mediated C−H/C−H cross-coupling reactions of cyclic nitrones 1a−c with a variety of π-excessive pyrroles and thiophenes 2a−g bearing both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents have been carried out. The elaborated cross-dehydrogenative C−C coupling reactions have been shown to result in the formation of previously unknown biheterocyclic ensembles containing the N-oxide group in the imidazole ring in 40−78% yields (Table 1). 826
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
Table 1. Scope and Yields for the Pd(II)-Mediated Oxidative Cross-Coupling Reaction of 2H-Imidazole 1-Oxides 1a−c with Pyrroles and Thiophenes 2a−ga,b
a Reaction conditions: 2H-imidazole 1-oxides 1a−c (1 mmol), pyrroles and thiophenes 2a−g (2 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (0.1 mmol), Cu(OAc)2·H2O (1.5 mmol), and pyridine (1.5 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL) at 110−120 °C for 24 h. bIsolated yields.
827
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
Table 2. Optimization of Conditions for the Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Oxidative Cross-Coupling Reaction of 2H-Imidazole 1Oxide 1b with Thiophene 2b entry
1b (mmol)
2b (mmol)
Pd(OAc)2 (mmol)
Cu(OAc)2·H2O (mmol)
reaction time (h)
yield of 3g (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 0.5 0.3
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.1 0.02 0.06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.5
2 4 8 12 24 2 12 24 24 32 24 24
36 42 45 52 58 36 54 57 75 73 72 70
a deuterium source. The data of the 1H NMR experiments performed are summarized in Table 3. In the first instance, the role of pyridine in the process has been studied. The control experiments with compounds 1a and 2b carried out without pyridine have afforded no deuterated products (Table 3, entries 1 and 2), thus showing the crucial role of pyridine as a ligand in these transformations. Indeed, in analogous experiments proceeding in the presence of pyridine the hydrogen−deuterium exchange was shown to occur in case of 2-acetylthiophene 2b (Table 3, entries 3 and 4). Therefore, it has been suggested that the initial step of the cross-coupling process under discussion is the formation of the
Scheme 1. H/D Exchange Experiments for CrossDehydrogenative Coupling Partners 1a and 2b
Figure 2. Fragments of the 1H NMR spectra of the resulted reaction mixtures for H/D-exchange control experiments in case of 2-acetylthiophene 2b in the absence (a) (Table 3, entry 2) and the presence (b) of pyridine (Table 3, entry 4). 828
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
Table 3. Conditions and Results of the H/D-Exchange Control Experimentsa conditions entry
1a (1.0 mmol)
2b (1.0 mmol)
Py (1.5 mmol)
Pd(OAc)2 (0.1 mmol)
Cu(OAc)2·H2O (1.5 mmol)
1a/1a-[D1] ratio
2b/2b-[D1] ratio
1 2 3 4 5 6
+ − + − − −
− + − + + +
− − + + + +
+ + + + − +
+ + + + + −
1.00:0 − 1.00:0 − − −
− 1.00:0 − 0.65:0.35 1.00:0 0.65:0.35
a
The resulted reaction mixtures were analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 at 295 K.
Scheme 2. Plausible Catalytic Cycle for the Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reactions of 2H-Imidazole 1-Oxides 1a−c with Pyrroles and Thiophenes 2a−g
palladium intermediates A takes place at the first step due to the interaction of heteroaromatic compounds 2a−g with palladium(II) and pyridine molecules, which act as ligands (Ln) that stabilize the organometallic intermediates.18 Intermediates A seem to be coordinated with the oxygen center of 2H-imidazole 1-oxides 1a−c through the ligand-exchange mechanism to form intermediates B. The chelate-controlled functionalization of the nitrone C(1)−H bond through the concerted metalation/deprotonation transformations20b,21 appears to afford the intermediates C. Further reductive elimination has likely to form the desired biheterocyclic products 3a−r and Pd(0). The latter can be transformed into Pd(II) form via oxidation with copper(II) acetate, thus undergoing the recycling process.
organopalladium intermediate derived from heteroaromatic compound 2 (pyrrole or thiophene) rather than from nitrone 1. To confirm this hypothesis, attempts to deuterate 2acetylthiophene 2b in the absence of either palladium catalyst Pd(OAc)2 or oxidant Cu(OAc)2 have been undertaken. As expected, no hydrogen−deuterium exchange has been found to be occur in the absence of palladium acetate (Table 3, entry 5), whereas in the absence of copper acetate, compound 2b was deuterated up to 35% (Table 3, entry 6). These data appear to support the hypothesis that the covalent C−Pd bond is formed at the first step of the cross-coupling process deriving from the reaction of thiophene/pyrrole 2 with palladium acetate. In addition, the experimental data obtained have enabled us to refute the other versions of the hydrogen−deuterium exchange process associated with acid−base interactions of 2 with pyridine. as well as with the formation of organocopper intermediates. To illustrate it, the distinctive fragments of the 1 H NMR spectra of the reaction mixtures after furnishing the H/D-exchange control experiments with 2-acetylthiophene 2b are shown in Figure 2. On the basis of the experimental results and the analysis of the literature data,20,21 a plausible mechanism for the described cross-coupling reactions has been advanced (Scheme 2). It suggests that the formation of above-mentioned organo-
■
CONCLUSIONS In summary, an original atom- and step-economical approach based on the palladium-mediated oxidative cross-dehydrogenative C−C coupling reactions (CDC) has successfully been applied for the synthesis of previously unknown biheterocyclic N-oxide ensembles. The mechanistic features of the C−H activation process have been highlighted, and the series of novel 5-heteroarylated 2H-imidazole 1-oxides, which are of particular interest in the design of bioactive molecules and 829
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
131.5 (C); 133.5 (C); 165.2 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 1478, 1446, 1420, 1384, 1367, 1354, 1318, 1244, 1228, 1194, 1155, 765, 742, 727, 697, 646 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 270 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C15H14N2OS: C, 66.64; H, 5.22; N, 10.36; O, 5.92; S, 11.86. Found: C, 66.62; H, 5.13; N, 9.91. 2,2-Dimethyl-5-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-4-phenyl-2Himidazole 1-Oxide (3c). Yield: 208 mg (78%), mp = 97−102 °C. Rf 0.1 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.59 (s, 6H); 3.49 (s, 3H); 6.01−6.02 (m, 1H); 6.10−6.12 (m, 1H); 7.00−7.01 (m, 1H); 7.39−7.43 (m, 2H); 7.48−7.55 (m, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 24.4 (CH3); 34.7 (CH3); 99.0 (C); 108.1 (CH); 112.5 (CH); 118.4 (C); 125.3 (CH); 127.8 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 130.0 (C); 130.9 (CH); 131.9 (C); 165.1 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 1544, 1502, 1444, 1429, 1386, 1345, 1329, 1245, 1227, 1182, 1155, 1094, 1059, 1028, 946, 775, 733, 695, 665, 654 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 267 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C16H17N3O: C, 71.89; H, 6.41; N, 15.72; O, 5.98. Found: C, 71.72; H, 6.60; N, 15.68. 2,2-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-5-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-2H-imidazole 1Oxide (3d). Yield: 170 mg (67%), mp = 99−104 °C. Rf 0.2 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.57 (s, 6H); 5.81−5.83 (m, 1H); 6.09−6.11 (m, 1H); 7.01−7.03 (m, 1H); 7.53−7.65 (m, 5H); 12.07 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 24.0 (CH3); 98.4 (C); 109.4 (CH); 111.6 (CH); 119.4 (C); 121.6 (CH); 128.76 (CH); 128.82 (CH); 129.7 (C); 130.9 (CH); 134.0 (C); 166.1 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 1553, 1479, 1438, 1421, 1390, 1365, 1330, 1194, 1166, 1112, 1067, 1040, 967, 776, 731, 700, 663, 648, 595 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 253 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C15H15N3O: C, 71.13; H, 5.97; N, 16.59; O, 6.32. Found: C, 71.30; H, 6.00; N, 16.54. 2,2-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-5-(5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-2Himidazole 1-Oxide (3e). Yield: 197 mg (60%), mp = 125−130 °C. Rf 0.2 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.62 (s, 6H); 5.98−6.00 (m, 1H); 6.68 (t, 1H, J = 3.36); 7.28 (t, 1H, J = 7.36); 7.42 (t, 2H, J = 7.72); 7.56−7.71 (m, 7H); 12.30 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 24.0 (CH3); 98.3 (C); 107.6 (CH); 112.9 (CH); 120.5 (C); 123.9 (CH); 127.1 (CH); 128.1 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 128.9 (CH); 129.0 (C); 130.5 (CH); 130.8 (C); 132.6 (C); 133.0 (C); 164.8 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3256, 3168, 3146, 3115, 2974, 2933, 1601, 1579, 1519, 1418, 1120, 1042, 931, 736, 696 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 329 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C21H19N3O: C, 76.57; H, 5.81; N, 12.76; O, 4.86. Found: C, 76.64; H, 5.76; N, 12.80. 2,2-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-5-(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indol-2yl)-2H-imidazole 1-Oxide (3f). Yield: 129 mg (42%), mp = 141−146 °C. Rf 0.2 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSOd6 + CCl4): δ 1.56 (d, 6H, J = 6.12); 1.59−1.61 (m, 2H); 1.68−1.70 (m, 2H); 2.30 (t, 2H, J = 5.82); 2.60 (t, 2H, J = 6.00); 5.58 (d, 1H, J = 2.04); 7.54−7.63 (m, 5H); 11.60 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): 22.2 (CH2); 22.51 (CH2); 22.54 (CH2); 23.0 (CH2); 24.0 (CH3); 97.4 (C); 110.0 (CH); 117.2 (C); 117.9 (C); 128.0 (CH); 128.1 (CH); 128.9 (C); 130.2 (CH); 130.4 (C); 133.5 (C); 165.3 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 2932, 1522, 1489, 1443, 1407, 1320, 1303, 1260, 1237, 1170, 1144, 1092, 1073, 1003, 975, 922, 803, 772, 696, 655 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 307 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C19H21N3O: C, 74.24; H, 6.89; N, 13.67; O, 5.20. Found: C, 74.10; H, 7.00; N, 13.76. 5-(5-Acetylthiophen-2-yl)-2-ethyl-2-methyl-4-phenyl-2Himidazole 1-Oxide (3g). Yield: 245 mg (75%), mp = 121−126 °C. Rf 0.1 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 0.59 (t, 3H, J = 7.32); 1.61 (s, 3H); 1.95−2.00 (m,
advanced materials, has been obtained and fully characterized. The developed methodology proved to be an efficient synthetic tool to provide C(sp2)−H/C(sp2)−H cross-coupling of 2H-imidazole 1-oxides with π-excessive heterocyclic compounds, such as pyrroles or thiophenes, affording the target products in yields up to 78%.
■
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION General Experimental Methods. The NMR (1H, 400 MHz and 13C, 100 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE II spectrometer in DMSO-d6 using tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. The 13C NMR spectra were recorded in a mode of attached proton test with full proton decoupling. The mass spectra (EI) were obtained by means of a SHIMADZU GCMS-QP2010 Ultra mass spectrometer. The infrared spectra were recorded on a Bruker Alpha FT-IR spectrometer. The elemental analysis was fulfilled on a CHNS/ O analyzer. The reactions course was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (0.25 mm silica gel plates, Merck 60F 254). Column chromatography was carried out on 220−440 mesh silica gel (60, 0.035−0.070 mm). General Procedure for the Synthesis of 3a−r. In a similar manner to the previously described procedure,15b a mixture of aldonitrone 1a−c (1 mmol), pyrrole or thiophene 2a−g (2 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (22.5 mg, 0.1 mmol), copper(II) acetate monohydrate (300 mg, 1.5 mmol), and pyridine (0.12 mL, 1.5 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL) was refluxed at 110−120 °C for 24 h. The cooled to ambient temperature reaction mass was then subjected to flash chromatography on neutral Al2O3 using ethyl acetate as an eluent. The resulted eluate was concentrated in vacuo to dryness. The formed residue was chromatographed using silica gel column technique with the EtOAc−hexane gradient elution. The obtained eluate was finally concentrated in vacuo. 2,2-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-2H-imidazole 1-oxide 1a, 3-phenyl1,4-diazaspiro[4.5]deca-1,3-diene 1-oxide 1c,22 and 2-ethyl-2methyl-4-phenyl-2H-imidazole 1-oxide 1b15b were prepared according to the published procedures. Thiophene 2a, 2acetylthiophene 2b, pyrrole 2c, 1-methylpyrrole 2d, 2-acetyl1H-pyrrole 2e, 2-phenyl-1H-pyrrole 2f, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1Hindole 2g, palladium(II) acetate, copper(II) acetate monohydrate, pyridine, and 1,4-dioxane were purchased from commercial sources. Characterization Data for All Products (3a−r). 5-(5Acetylthiophen-2-yl)-2,2-dimethyl-4-phenyl-2H-imidazole 1Oxide (3a). Yield: 200 mg (64%), mp = 137−142 °C. Rf 0.2 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.61 (s, 6H); 2.53 (s, 3H); 6.96 (d, 1H, J = 4.16); 7.57−7.70 (m, 5H); 7.81 (d, 1H, J = 4.12) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 24.0 (CH3); 26.8 (CH3); 99.5 (C); 127.9 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 128.5 (CH); 130.5 (CH); 131.4 (C); 132.0 (CH); 133.0 (C); 133.9 (C); 142.2 (C); 164.5 (C); 191.3 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3850, 3243, 3188, 3167, 3141, 2978, 1602, 1579, 1519, 1442, 1133, 917, 735, 696, 580 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 312 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C17H16N2O2S: C, 65.36; H, 5.16; N, 8.97; O, 10.24; S, 10.26. Found: C, 64.89; H, 4.81; N, 7.82. 2,2-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-5-(thiophen-2-yl)-2H-imidazole 1Oxide (3b). Yield: 151 mg (56%), mp = 107−112 °C. Rf 0.3 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.59 (s, 6H); 6.99 (d, 1H, J = 3.12); 7.08 (t, 1H, J = 4.08); 7.58− 7.68 (m, 5H); 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 4.64) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSOd6): δ 24.1 (CH3); 98.6 (C); 126.5 (CH); 127.4 (CH); 127.6 (C); 128.2 (CH); 128.3 (CH); 128.5 (CH); 130.5 (CH); 830
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
ν 3449, 2927, 2847, 1601, 1572, 1535, 1487, 1443, 1269, 955, 752, 690, 646, 565 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 343 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C22H21N3O: C, 76.94; H, 6.16; N, 12.24; O, 4.66. Found: C, 74.66; H, 6.15; N, 11.74. 5-(5-Acetyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-2-ethyl-2-methyl-4-phenyl-2Himidazole 1-Oxide (3l). Yield: 167 mg (54%), mp = 157−162 °C. Rf 0.1 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 0.58 (t, 3H, J = 7.28); 1.55 (s, 3H); 1.91−1.96 (m, 1H); 2.08−2.13 (m, 1H); 2.25 (s, 3H); 7.05 (s, 1H); 7.56− 7.64 (m, 6H); 12.27 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.7 (CH3); 23.3 (CH3); 25.5 (CH3); 30.1 (CH2); 100.8 (C); 110.8 (C); 114.5 (CH); 125.7 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 128.5 (CH); 130.5 (CH); 131.5 (C); 131.9 (C); 133.5 (C); 167.2 (C); 187.2 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3131, 2970, 1658, 1569, 1445, 1360, 1339, 1306, 1186, 1135, 1083, 952, 940, 838, 766, 701, 629 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 309 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C18H19N3O2: C, 69.88; H, 6.19; N, 13.58; O, 10.34. Found: C, 69.63; H, 6.27; N, 13.36. 2-(5-Acetylthiophen-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1,4-diazaspiro[4.5]deca-1,3-diene 1-Oxide (3m). Yield: 246 mg (70%), mp = 163−168 °C. Rf 0.3 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSOd6 + CCl4): δ 1.40−1.43 (m, 1H); 1.56 (d, 2H, J = 12.36); 1.72−1.89 (m, 5H); 2.03−2.10 (m, 2H); 2.52 (s, 3H); 6.96 (d, 1H, J = 4.24); 7.58−7.70 (m, 5H); 7.81 (d, 1H, J = 4.28) ppm. 13 C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 22.7 (CH2); 24.2 (CH2); 26.8 (CH3); 34.4 (CH2); 101.8 (C); 127.8 (CH); 128.3 (CH); 128.5 (CH); 130.4 (CH); 131.6 (C); 132.0 (CH); 133.3 (C); 133.9 (C); 142.1 (C); 164.7 (C); 191.3 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 2933, 2921, 2860, 1650, 1560, 1446, 1383, 1363, 1309, 1273, 1196, 959, 818, 773, 707, 695, 657 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 352 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C20H20N2O2S: C, 68.16; H, 5.72; N, 7.95; O, 9.08; S, 9.10. Found: C, 68.15; H, 5.66; N, 7.56. 3-Phenyl-2-(thiophen-2-yl)-1,4-diazaspiro[4.5]deca-1,3diene 1-Oxide (3n). Yield: 202 mg (65%), mp = 179−184 °C. Rf 0.4 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.44−1.52 (m, 3H); 1.80−1.88 (m, 5H); 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 3.24); 7.56−7.67 (m, 6H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 22.5 (CH2); 24.1 (CH2); 34.4 (CH2); 100.7 (C); 126.1 (CH); 127.1 (CH); 127.3 (C); 127.8 (CH); 128.0 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 130.0 (CH); 131.3 (C); 133.5 (C); 165.1 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3063, 2933, 2860, 1566, 1496, 1477, 1444, 1422, 1383, 1359, 1339, 1324, 1292, 959, 770, 735, 702, 659, 629 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 310 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C18H18N2OS: C, 69.65; H, 5.84; N, 9.02; O, 5.15; S, 10.33. Found: C, 68.87; H, 5.69; N, 8.71. 2-(1-Methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1,4-diazaspiro[4.5]deca-1,3-diene 1-Oxide (3o). Yield: 184 mg (60%), mp = 157−162 °C. Rf 0.3 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSOd6 + CCl4): δ 1.40−1.52 (m, 3H); 1.83−1.88 (m, 5H); 2.02− 2.09 (m, 2H); 3.46 (s, 3H); 6.00−6.02 (m, 1H); 6.10−6.11 (m, 1H); 7.00 (t, 1H, J = 2.06); 7.41 (t, 2H, J = 7.44); 7.49− 7.54 (m, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 22.6 (CH2); 24.3 (CH2); 34.5 (CH3); 34.8 (CH2); 101.2 (C); 107.9 (CH); 112.2 (CH); 118.3 (C); 125.0 (CH); 127.6 (CH); 128.0 (CH); 130.0 (C); 130.6 (CH); 132.1 (C); 165.3 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 2941, 2927, 1544, 1503, 1487, 1443, 1377, 1350, 1329, 1278, 1167, 961, 728, 688, 675, 658, 609 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 307 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C19H21N3O: C, 74.24; H, 6.89; N, 13.67; O, 5.20. Found: C, 74.26; H, 7.00; N, 13.60. 3-Phenyl-2-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-1,4-diazaspiro[4.5]deca-1,3diene 1-Oxide (3p). Yield: 135 mg (46%), mp = 195−200 °C. Rf 0.4 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.38−1.49 (m, 3H); 1.75−1.88 (m, 5H); 2.10 (t, 2H, J =
1H); 2.14−2.19 (m, 1H); 2.53 (s, 3H); 6.97 (d, 1H, J = 4.24); 7.58−7.70 (m, 5H); 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 4.28) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): 6.7 (CH3); 23.0 (CH3); 26.9 (CH3); 30.3 (CH2); 102.0 (C); 128.0 (CH); 128.3 (CH); 128.7 (CH); 130.7 (CH); 132.2 (CH); 132.6 (C); 133.1 (C); 133.6 (C); 142.3 (C); 165.6 (C); 191.5 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 1659, 1611, 1575, 1499, 1447, 1381, 1368, 1349, 1306, 1266, 1197, 1148, 944, 812 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 326 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C18H18N2O2S: C, 66.23; H, 5.56; N, 8.58; O, 9.80; S, 9.82. Found: C, 65.93; H, 5.36; N, 7.95. 2-Ethyl-2-methyl-4-phenyl-5-(thiophen-2-yl)-2H-imidazole 1-Oxide (3h). Yield: 170 mg (60%), mp = 83−88 °C. Rf 0.3 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 0.58 (t, 3H, J = 7.28); 1.59 (s, 3H); 1.94−2.01 (m, 1H); 2.10− 2.17 (m, 1H); 7.01 (d, 1H, J = 3.52); 7.09 (t, 1H, J = 4.48); 7.57−7.67 (m, 5H); 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 4.8 ppm). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): 6.7 (CH3); 23.1 (CH3); 30.1 (CH2); 101.0 (C); 126.6 (CH); 127.2 (C); 127.4 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 128.3 (CH); 128.6 (CH); 130.5 (CH); 132.6 (C); 133.4 (C); 166.2 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3330, 3274, 3213, 3180, 2968, 2855, 1641, 1603, 1537, 1443, 1372, 1180, 1143, 941, 694 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 284 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C16H16N2OS: C, 67.58; H, 5.67; N, 9.85; O, 5.63; S, 11.28. Found: C, 67.02; H, 5.43; N, 9.64. 2-Ethyl-2-methyl-5-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-4-phenyl2H-imidazole 1-Oxide (3i). Yield: 197 mg (70%), mp = 79− 84 °C. Rf 0.2 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 0.63 (t, 3H, J = 7.32); 1.58 (s, 3H); 1.92−1.98 (m, 1H); 2.12−2.17 (m, 1H); 3.49 (s, 3H); 5.98−5.99 (m, 1H); 6.10−6.12 (m, 1H); 7.02 (t, 1H, J = 2.12); 7.40−7.43 (m, 2H); 7.49−7.53 (m, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.8 (CH3); 23.8 (CH3); 30.2 (CH2); 35.0 (CH3); 101.5 (C); 108.2 (CH); 112.5 (CH); 118.4 (C); 125.5 (CH); 127.8 (CH); 128.3 (CH); 131.0 (CH); 131.3 (C); 131.9 (C); 166.2 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 1545, 1505, 1487, 1461, 1447, 1433, 1379, 1350, 1331, 1281, 1179, 954, 721, 693, 660 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 281 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C17H19N3O: C, 72.57; H, 6.81; N, 14.94; O, 5.69. Found: C, 72.00; H, 6.86; N, 14.53. 2-Ethyl-2-methyl-4-phenyl-5-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-2H-imidazole 1-Oxide (3j). Yield: 134 mg (50%), mp = 89−94 °C. Rf 0.2 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 0.60 (t, 3H, J = 7.24); 1.57 (s, 3H); 1.94−1.99 (m, 1H); 2.09− 2.14 (m, 1H); 5.82 (s, 1H); 6.10 (d, 1H, J = 2.64); 7.02 (s, 1H); 7.54−7.64 (m, 5H); 12.08 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.8 (CH3); 23.2 (CH3); 29.9 (CH2); 100.4 (C); 109.0 (CH); 111.2 (CH); 118.6 (C); 121.1 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 128.4 (CH); 130.3 (C); 130.4 (CH); 133.4 (C); 166.4 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3293, 1557, 1446, 1409, 1391, 1362, 1325, 1196, 1114, 1070, 1043, 824, 760, 734, 701, 659, 599 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 267 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C16H17N3O: C, 71.89; H, 6.41; N, 15.72; O, 5.98. Found: C, 71.12; H, 6.66; N, 14.67. 2-Ethyl-2-methyl-4-phenyl-5-(5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)2H-imidazole 1-Oxide (3k). Yield: 199 mg (58%), mp = 75− 80 °C. Rf 0.3 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 0.64 (t, 3H, J = 7.30); 1.61 (s, 3H); 1.98−2.03 (m, 1H); 2.14−2.19 (m, 1H); 5.99−6.00 (m, 1H); 6.68 (t, 1H, J = 3.36); 7.29 (t, 1H, J = 7.36); 7.42 (t, 2H, J = 7.72); 7.58−7.70 (m, 7H); 12.28 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.8 (CH3); 23.2 (CH3); 30.0 (CH2); 100.8 (C); 107.8 (CH); 113.1 (CH); 120.2 (C); 124.0 (CH); 127.2 (CH); 128.2 (CH); 128.5 (CH); 129.1 (CH); 130.2 (C); 130.7 (CH); 130.9 (C); 132.8 (C); 133.0 (C); 165.9 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): 831
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
■
11.64); 5.81 (s, 1H); 6.09 (d, 1H, J = 2.76); 7.01 (s, 1H); 7.53−7.64 (m, 5H); 12.07 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSOd6): δ 22.9 (CH2); 24.4 (CH2); 34.4 (CH2); 100.2 (C); 108.9 (CH); 111.1 (CH); 118.9 (C); 121.0 (CH); 128.26 (CH); 128.28 (CH); 129.3 (C); 130.3 (CH); 133.7 (C); 165.6 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3284, 2943, 2922, 2851, 1498, 1441, 1408, 1392, 1373, 1332, 1113, 1088, 1058, 996, 729, 696 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 293 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C18H19N3O: C, 73.69; H, 6.53; N, 14.32; O, 5.45. Found: C, 73.54; H, 6.55; N, 14.27. 3-Phenyl-2-(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indol-2-yl)-1,4diazaspiro[4.5]deca-1,3-diene 1-Oxide (3q). Yield: 132 mg (40%), mp = 167−172 °C. Rf 0.4 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6 + CCl4): δ 1.43 (d, 2H, J = 12.64); 1.59− 1.84 (m, 10H); 2.06−2.12 (m, 2H); 2.29 (d, 2H, J = 5.56); 2.58 (d, 2H, J = 5.8); 5.55 (d, 1H, J = 1.16); 7.53−7.62 (m, 5H); 11.62 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 22.1 (CH2); 22.5 (CH2); 22.6 (CH2); 23.0 (CH2); 24.3 (CH2); 34.3 (CH2); 99.5 (C); 109.8 (CH); 117.2 (C); 117.8 (C); 128.0 (CH); 129.0 (C); 130.0 (CH); 130.2 (C); 133.7 (C); 165.5 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 2924, 2851, 1601, 1538, 1489, 1442, 1336, 1267, 1233, 1184, 1009, 971, 954, 698, 566 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 347 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C22H25N3O: C, 76.05; H, 7.25; N, 12.09; O, 4.60. Found: C, 76.14; H, 7.30; N, 12.11. 2-(5-Acetyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1,4-diazaspiro[4.5]deca-1,3-diene 1-Oxide (3r). Yield: 147 mg (44%), mp = 195−200 °C. Rf 0.1 (heptane/EtOAc, 6:4). 1H NMR (DMSOd6 + CCl4): δ 1.42 (d, 2H, J = 12.16); 1.79 (t, 6H, J = 14.58); 2.06 (t, 2H, J = 11.16); 2.24 (s, 3H); 7.04 (s, 1H); 7.56−7.64 (m, 6H); 12.24 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 22.9 (CH2); 24.5 (CH2); 25.5 (CH3); 34.6 (CH2); 100.7 (C); 111.1 (C); 114.6 (CH); 125.8 (CH); 128.3 (CH); 128.4 (CH); 130.4 (CH); 130.9 (C); 131.4 (C); 133.8 (C); 166.4 (C); 187.2 (C) ppm. IR (DRA): ν 3236, 2938, 1647, 1561, 1442, 1367, 1331, 1300, 1236, 1065, 1002, 831, 786, 773, 710 cm−1. MS (EI): m/z 335 [M]+. Anal. calcd for C20H21N3O2: C, 71.62; H, 6.31; N, 12.53; O, 9.54. Found: C, 70.00; H, 6.53; N, 11.59. General Procedure for the H/D Exchange Control Experiments. The hydrogen−deuterium exchange control experiments were carried out according to the literature procedure.19 The deuteration reactions of either 2H-imidazole 1-oxide 1a or 2-acetylthiophene 2b separately carried out using the conditions noted in Table 3. Heavy water D2O (20.0 mmol) was used as a deuterium source. All reaction mixtures were refluxed at 110−120 °C for 24 h in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL). Then, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, filtered through neutral alumina, and concentrated in vacuo. The obtained residues were individually analyzed by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy.
■
Article
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail:
[email protected]. ORCID
Alexey A. Akulov: 0000-0003-3966-3728 Mikhail V. Varaksin: 0000-0002-7997-3686 Oleg N. Chupakhin: 0000-0002-1672-2476 Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
■ ■
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project no. 18-73-00088). REFERENCES
(1) (a) Heterocyclic N-Oxides; Larionov, O. V., Ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, 2017. (b) Cerecetto, H.; Dias, E.; Di Maio, R.; Gonzalez, M.; Pacce, S.; Saenz, P.; Seoane, G.; et al. Synthesis and Herbicidal Activity of N-Oxide Derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2995− 3002. (c) Messenger, A. G.; Rundegren, J. Minoxidil: mechanisms of action on hair growth. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004, 150, 186−194. (d) Padois, K.; Cantien, C.; Bertholle, V.; et al. Solid lipid nanoparticles suspension versus commercial solutions for dermal delivery of minoxidil. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 416, 300−304. (2) (a) Mfuh, A. M.; Larionov, O. V. Heterocyclic N-Oxides - An Emerging Class of Therapeutic Agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 2819−2857. (b) Oliveira, C.; Benfeito, S.; Fernandes, C.; Cagide, F.; Silva, T.; Borges, F. NO and HNO donors, nitrones, and nitroxides: Past, present, and future. Med. Res. Rev. 2018, 38, 1159−1187. (c) Anderson, L. L. Diverse Applications of Nitrones for the Synthesis of Heterocyclic Compounds. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 9−30. (d) Zhang, G.; Zhang, T.; Li, N.; Wu, L.; Gu, J.; Li, C.; Zhao, C.; Liu, W.; Shan, L.; Yu, P.; Yang, X.; Tang, Y.; Yang, G.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z. Tetramethylpyrazine nitrone activates the BDNF/Akt/ CREB pathway to promote post-ischaemic neuroregeneration and recovery of neurological functions in rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175, 517−531. (3) (a) Ihsan, A.; Wang, X.; Tu, H.-G.; Zhang, W.; Dai, M.-H.; Peng, D.-P.; Wang, Y.-L.; Huang, L.-L.; Chen, D.-M.; Mannan, S.; Tao, Y.F.; Liu, Z.-L.; Yuan, Z.-H. Genotoxicity evaluation of Mequindox in different short-term tests. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 330−336. (b) Palani, A.; Tagat, J. R. Discovery and Development of SmallMolecule Chemokine Coreceptor CCR5 Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 2851−2857. (c) Debnath, A. K. Generation of Predictive Pharmacophore Models for CCR5 Antagonists: Study with Piperidine- and Piperazine-Based Compounds as a New Class of HIV-1 Entry Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4501−4515. (d) Tagat, J. R.; Steensma, R. W.; McCombie, S. W.; Dennis, V.; Nazaren, D. V.; Lin, S. L.; Neustadt, B. R.; Cox, K.; Xu, S.; Wojcik, L.; Murray, M. G.; Vantuno, N.; Baroudy, B. M.; Strizki, J. M. PiperazineBased CCR5 Antagonists as HIV-1 Inhibitors. II. Discovery of 1[(2,4-Dimethyl-3-pyridinyl)carbonyl]-4-methyl-4-[3(S)-methyl-4[1(S)-[4-(trifluoro- methyl)phenyl]ethyl]-1-piperazinyl]-piperidine N1-Oxide (Sch-350634), an Orally Bioavailable, Potent CCR5 Antagonist. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3343−3346. (e) Ganley, B.; Chowdhury, G.; Bhansali, J.; Daniels, J. S.; Gates, K. S. Redoxactivated, hypoxia-selective DNA cleavage by quinoxaline 1,4-di-Noxide. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 2395−2401. (f) Miroshnikova, O. V.; Hudson, T. H.; Gerena, L.; Kyle, D. E.; Lin, A. J. Synthesis and Antimalarial Activity of New Isotebuquine Analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 889−896. (g) Ibrahim, H.; Furiga, A.; Najahi, E.; Pigasse Hénocq, C.; Nallet, J. P.; Roques, C.; Aubouy, A.; Sauvain, M.; Constant, P.; Daffé, M.; Nepveu, F. Antibacterial, antifungal and antileishmanial activities of indolone-N-oxide derivatives. J. Antibiot. 2012, 65, 499−504. (h) Benítez, D.; Casanova, G.; Cabrera, G.; Galanti, N.; Cerecetto, H.; González, M. Initial studies on mechanism
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information *
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916. 1 H and 13C NMR spectra of 3a−r; 1H−13C heteronuclear single quantum coherence, 1H−13C heteronuclear multiple bond correlation, and 1H−1H nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy 2D NMR spectra of 3c; 1 H NMR spectra of reaction mixtures, isolated during the H/D exchange control experiments (PDF)
832
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
of action and cell death of active N-oxide-containing heterocycles in Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes in vitro. Parasitology 2014, 141, 682−696. (i) Robert, A. F.; Chandru, H. K.; He, T.; Towner, R. AntiCancer Activity of Nitrones and Observations on Mechanism of Action. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 373−379. (j) Barriga, G.; Olea-Azar, C.; Norambuena, E.; Castro, A.; Porcal, W.; Gerpe, A.; González, M.; Cerecetto, H. New heteroaryl nitrones with spin trap properties: Identification of a 4-furoxanyl derivative with excellent properties to be used in biological systems. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 795−802. (k) Rosselin, M.; Poeggeler, B.; Durand, G. Nitrone Derivatives as Therapeutics: From Chemical Modification to Specifictargeting. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 2006−2022. (l) Floyd, R. A.; Kopke, R. D.; Choi, C. H.; Foster, S. B.; Doblas, S.; Towner, R. A. Nitrones as Therapeutics. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 1361− 1374. (m) Porcal, W.; Hernández, P.; González, M.; Ferreira, A.; Olea-Azar, C.; Cerecetto, H.; Castro, A. Heteroarylnitrones as Drugs for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Synthesis, Neuroprotective Properties, and Free Radical Scavenger Properties. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 6150−6159. (4) (a) Chlordiazepoxide, DrugBank ID DB00475 (APRD00682). https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00475, (accessed April 2018); (b) Skerritt, J. H.; Johnston, G. A. Enhancement of GABA binding by benzodiazepines and related anxiolytics. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1983, 89, 193−198. (c) McKernan, R. M.; Rosahl, T. W.; Reynolds, D. S.; Sur, C.; Wafford, K. A.; Atack, J. R.; Farrar, S.; Myers, J.; Cook, G.; Ferris, P.; Garrett, L.; Bristow, L.; Marshall, G.; Macaulay, A.; Brown, N.; Howell, O.; Moore, K. W.; Carling, R. W.; Street, L. J.; Castro, J. L.; Ragan, C. I.; Dawson, G. R.; Whiting, P. J. Sedative but not anxiolytic properties of benzodiazepines are mediated by the GABAA receptor α1 subtype. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3, 587−592. (5) Lumeras, W.; Vidal, L.; Vidal, B.; Balague, C.; Orellana, A.; Maldonado, M.; Domińguez, M.; Segarra, V.; Caturla, F. 1,7Naphthyridine 1-oxides as novel potent and selective inhibitors of p38 mitogen activated protein kinase. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 7899− 7910. (6) (a) Schiefer, I. T.; VandeVrede, L.; Fá, M.; Arancio, O.; Thatcher, G. R. J. Furoxans (1,2,5-Oxadiazole-N-Oxides) as Novel NO Mimetic Neuroprotective and Procognitive Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 3076−3087. (b) Aguirre, G.; Boiani, M.; Cerecetto, H.; Fernández, M.; González, M.; León, E.; Pintos, C.; Raymondo, S.; Arredondo, C.; Pacheco, J. P.; Basombrío, M. Furoxan derivatives as cytotoxic agents: preliminary in vivo antitumoral activity studies. Pharmazie 2006, 61, 54−59. (7) (a) Goldstein, S.; Lestage, P. Chemical and pharmacological aspects of heteroaryl-nitrones. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 1255−1267. (b) Sumitomo Pharma; Ikeda, K.; Tatsuno, T.; Ogo, H.; Masumoto, S.; Fugibayashi, T.; Najata, R. Nitrone Derivatives. WO9813332, 1998. (c) Nepveu, F.; Souchard, J. P.; Rolland, Y.; Dorey, G.; Spedding, M. 2-2′-Pyridylisatogen, a selective allosteric modulator of P2 receptors, is a spin trapping agent. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 242, 272−276. (8) (a) Zhao, D.; You, J.; Hu, C. Recent Progress in Coupling of Two Heteroarenes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5466−5492. (b) Yang, Y.; Lan, J.; You, J. Oxidative C−H/C−H Coupling Reactions between Two (Hetero)arenes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8787−8863. (c) Simonetti, M.; Cannas, D. M.; Larrosa, I. Biaryl Synthesis via C−H Bond Activation: Strategies and Methods. In Advances in Organometallic Chemistry; 1st ed., Pérez, P. J., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2017; Chapter 4; Vol. 67, pp 299−399. (d) Perry, G. J. P.; Larrosa, I. Recent Progress in Decarboxylative Oxidative Cross-Coupling for Biaryl Synthesis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 3517−3527. (e) Yamaguchi, J.; Itami, K. Biaryl Synthesis through Metal-Catalyzed C−H Arylation. In Metal Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More, 1st ed.; de Meijere, A.; Bräse, S.; Oestreich, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2014; Chapter 17, pp 1315−1387. (f) Mehta, V. P.; Punji, B. Recent advances in transition-metal-free direct C−C and C−heteroatom bond forming reactions. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 11957−11986. (9) (a) García-Melchor, M.; Solans-Monfort, X.; Ujaque, G. C−C Bond Formation. In Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II, 2nd ed.;
Reedijk, J.; Poeppelmeier, K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2013; Chapter 28; Vol. 9, pp 767−805; (b) Zhang, Y. H.; Shi, G. F.; Yu, J.Q. Carbon−Carbon σ-Bond Formation via CH Bond Functionalization. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II, 2nd ed.; Knochel, P.; Molander, G. A., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2014; Chapter 23; Vol. 3, pp 1101−1209; (c) Hoffman, R. V. Organic Chemistry: An Intermediate Text, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, 2004; (d) Li, C.-J., Ed. From C−H to C−C Bonds: Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2015; (e) Yeung, C. S.; Dong, V. M. Catalytic Dehydrogenative Cross-Coupling: Forming Carbon− Carbon Bonds by Oxidizing Two Carbon−Hydrogen Bonds. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1215−1292. (f) Abakumov, G. A.; Piskunov, A. V.; Cherkasov, V. K.; Fedushkin, I. L.; Ananikov, V. P.; Eremin, D. B.; Gordeev, E. G.; Beletskaya, I. P.; Averin, A. D.; Bochkarev, M. N.; Trifonov, A. A.; Dzhemilev, U. M.; Dyakonov, V. A.; Egorov, M. P.; Vereshchagin, A. N.; Syroeshkin, M. A.; Jouikov, V. V.; Muzafarov, A. M.; Anisimov, A. A.; Arzumanyan, A. V.; Kononevich, Y. N.; Temnikov, M. N.; Sinyashin, O. G.; Budnikova, Y. H.; Burilov, A. R.; Karasik, A. A.; Mironov, V. F.; Storozhenko, P. A.; Shcherbakova, G. I.; Trofimov, B. A.; Amosova, S. V.; Gusarova, N. K.; Potapov, V. A.; Shur, V. B.; Burlakov, V. V.; Bogdanov, V. S.; Andreev, M. V. Organoelement chemistry: promising growth areas and challenges. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2018, 87, 393−507. (10) (a) Sheldon, R. A. Atom efficiency and catalysis in organic synthesis. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1233−1246. (b) Dicks, A. P.; Hent, A. Atom Economy and Reaction Mass Efficiency. In Green Chemistry Metrics: A Guide to Determining and Evaluating Process Greenness (SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science), 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, 2015; Chapter 2, pp 17−44; (c) Sheldon, R. A. Fundamentals of green chemistry: efficiency in reaction design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1437−1451. (d) Sheldon, R. A.; Arends, I.; Hanefeld, U. Green Chemistry and Catalysis; John Wiley & Sons: Weinheim, 2007; (e) Mulvihill, M. J.; Beach, E. S.; Zimmerman, J. B.; Anastas, P. T. Green Chemistry and Green Engineering: A Framework for Sustainable Technology Development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2011, 36, 271−293. (f) Lancaster, M. Green Chemistry. An Introductory Text; 2nd ed.; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, 2010; p 328. (g) Anastas, P.; Eghbali, N. Green chemistry: principles and practice. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301−312. (11) (a) Dixneuf, P. H.; Doucet, H., Eds. C−H Bond Activation and Catalytic Functionalization I and II; Springer: Berlin, 2016; (b) Li, J. J., Ed. C−H Bond Activation in Organic Synthesis; CRC Press: New York, 2015; (c) Murakami, K.; Yamada, S.; Kaneda, T.; Itami, K. C−H Functionalization of Azines. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9302−9332. (d) Shang, R.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Iron-Catalyzed C−H Bond Activation. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9086−9139. (e) Bohra, H.; Wang, M. Direct C−H arylation: a “Greener” approach towards facile synthesis of organic semiconducting molecules and polymers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11550−11571. (f) Davies, H. M. L.; Morton, D. Recent Advances in C−H Functionalization. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 343−350. (g) Zhu, R. Y.; Farmer, M. E.; Chen, Y. Q.; Yu, J. Q. A Simple and Versatile Amide Directing Group for C−H Functionalizations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10578−10599;(h) Zhu, R.-Y.; et al. Eine einfache und vielseitige dirigierende Amidgruppe zur Funktionalisierung von C-H-Bindungen. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 10734−10756. (i) He, F.; Wang, Z.-X. Nickel-catalyzed crosscoupling of aryl or 2-menaphthyl quaternary ammonium triflates with organoaluminum reagents. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 4450−4457. (j) Charushin, V.; Chupakhin, O., Eds. Metal Free C−H Functionalization of Aromatics. Nucleophilic Displacement of Hydrogen; Springer: Cham, 2014. (12) (a) Liu, C.; Yuan, J.; Gao, M.; Tang, S.; Li, W.; Shi, R.; Lei, A. Oxidative Coupling between Two Hydrocarbons: An Update of Recent C−H Functionalizations. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12138− 12204. (b) Han, W.; Ofial, A. R. No Detours: Palladium-Catalyzed Oxidative C−H/C−H Cross-Couplings of Heteroarenes. Synlett 2011, 2011, 1951−1955. (c) Liu, C.; Zhang, H.; Shi, W.; Lei, A. Bond Formations between Two Nucleophiles: Transition Metal Catalyzed Oxidative Cross-Coupling Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 833
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834
ACS Omega
Article
1780−1824. (d) Sun, C.-L.; Shi, Z.-J. Transition-Metal-Free Coupling Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9219−9280. (e) Cho, S. H.; Kim, J. Y.; Kwak, J.; Chang, S. Recent advances in the transition metalcatalyzed twofold oxidative C−H bond activation strategy for C−C and C−N bond formation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5068−5083. (f) Choy, P. Y.; Wong, S. M.; Kapdi, A.; Kwong, F. Y. Recent developments in palladium-catalysed non-directed coupling of (hetero)arene C−H bonds with C−Z (Z = B, Si, Sn, S, N, C, H) bonds in bi(hetero)aryl synthesis. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 288− 321. (13) (a) Zubenko, D.; Kirilyuk, I.; Roschchupkina, G.; Zhurko, I.; Reznikov, V.; Marque, S. R. A.; Bagryanskaya, E. 2,5-Dihydro-1Himidazole-Based Nitroxides as Prospective Mediators in Living Radical Polymerization. Helv. Chim. Acta 2006, 89, 2341−2353. (b) Edeleva, M. V.; Parkhomenko, D. A.; Morozov, D. A.; Dobrynin, S. A.; Trofimov, D. G.; Kanagatov, B.; Kirilyuk, I. A.; Bagryanskaya, E. G. Controlled/living polymerization of methyl methacrylate using new sterically hindered imidazoline nitroxides prepared via intramolecular 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 929−943. (c) Varaksin, M. V.; Moseev, T. D.; Charushin, V. N.; Chupakhin, O. N. Direct C−Li/C−H coupling of pentafluorophenyl lithium with azines - An atom- and stepeconomical strategy for the synthesis of polyfluoroaryl azaaromatics. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 867, 278−283. (14) (a) Voinov, M. A.; Shevelev, T. G.; Rybalova, T. V.; Gatilov, Y. V.; Pervukhina, N. V.; Burdukov, A. B.; Grigor’ev, I. A. αOrganoelement Nitrones: Synthesis, Properties, and IR and 13C NMR Spectral and X-ray Structural Characterization. Organometallics 2007, 26, 1607−1615. (b) Varaksin, M. V.; Utepova, I. A.; Chupakhin, O. N.; Charushin, V. N. Direct nuclophilic C−H functionalization of azines and their N-oxides by lithium derivatives of aldonitrones. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 7077−7082. (c) Varaksin, M. V.; Utepova, I. A.; Chupakhin, O. N. Direct C−C coupling of cyclic aldonitrones with 1,2,4-triazines using SNH reactions. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2012, 48, 1213−1219. (15) (a) Varaksin, M.; Moseev, T.; Chupakhin, O.; Charushin, V.; Trofimov, B. Metal-free C−H functionalization of 2H-imidazole 1oxides with pyrrolyl fragments in the design of novel azaheterocyclic ensembles. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 8280−8284. (b) Varaksin, M. V.; Utepova, I. A.; Chupakhin, O. N.; Charushin, V. N. Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Oxidative C−H/C−H Coupling and Eliminative SNH Reactions in Direct Functionalization of Imidazole Oxides with Indoles. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9087−9093. (16) Xi, P.; Yang, F.; Qin, S.; Zhao, D.; Lan, J.; Gao, G.; Hu, C.; You, J. Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Oxidative C−H/C−H CrossCoupling of Heteroarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1822−1824. (17) (a) Wu, Y.; Wang, J.; Mao, F.; Kwong, F. Y. PalladiumCatalyzed Cross-Dehydrogenative Functionalization of C(sp2)−H Bonds. Chem. - Asian J. 2014, 9, 26−47. (b) Guo, X. W.; Li, Z.; Li, C.J. Cross-dehydrogenative-coupling (CDC) reaction. Prog. Chem. 2010, 22, 1434−1441. (c) Liu, S.; Tzschucke, C. C. PalladiumCatalyzed Regioselective Dehydrogenative C−H/C−H Cross-Coupling of Pyrroles and Pyridine N-Oxides. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2016, 3509−3513. (d) Varun, B. V.; Dhineshkumar, J.; Bettadapur, K. R.; Siddaraju, Y.; Alagiri, K.; Ramaiah Prabhu, K. Recent advancements in dehydrogenative cross coupling reactions for CC bond formation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 803−824. (e) Li, C.-J. Crossdehydrogenative coupling (CDC): exploring C−C bond formations beyond functional group transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 335−344. (18) Stuart, D. R.; Fagnou, K. The Catalytic Cross-Coupling of Unactivated Arenes. Science 2007, 316, 1172−1175. (19) Liu, W.; Yu, X.; Li, C.; Kuang, C. Palladium-catalyzed oxidative CH/CH cross-coupling of pyridine N-oxides with five-membered heterocycles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9291−9294. (20) (a) Cho, S. H.; Hwang, S. J.; Chang, S. Palladium-Catalyzed C−H Functionalization of Pyridine N-Oxides: Highly Selective Alkenylation and Direct Arylation with Unactivated Arenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9254−9256. (b) Roudesly, F.; Veiros, L. F.;
Oble, J.; Poli, G. Pd-Catalyzed Direct C−H Alkenylation and Allylation of Azine N-Oxides. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2346−2350. (21) Ackermann, L.; Vicente, R.; Kapdi, A. R. Transition-metalcatalyzed direct arylation of (hetero)arenes by C−H bond cleavage. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9792−9826. (22) Kirilyuk, I. A.; Grigor’ev, I. A.; Volodarskii, L. B. Synthesis of 2H-imidazole 1-oxides and stable nitroxyl radicals based on them. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1991, 40, 1871−1879.
834
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02916 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 825−834