Distribution, Bioaccumulation, Trophic Transfer, and Influences of

Apr 6, 2017 - In view of the final destination of nanomaterials, the water system would be an important sink. However, the environmental behavior of n...
1 downloads 12 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia

Article

Distribution, bioaccumulation, trophic transfer, and influences of CeO2 nanoparticles in a constructed aquatic food web Xingchen Zhao, Miao Yu, Dan Xu, Aifeng Liu, Xingwang Hou, Fang Hao, Yanmin Long, Qunfang Zhou, and Guibin Jiang Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05875 • Publication Date (Web): 06 Apr 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 13, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

1 2 3

Distribution, bioaccumulation, trophic transfer, and influences of CeO2 nanoparticles in a constructed aquatic food web

4 5

Xingchen Zhao1,2, Miao Yu1,2, Dan Xu1,2, Aifeng Liu1,2, Xingwang Hou1,2, Fang

6

Hao1,2, Yanmin Long1,3, Qunfang Zhou1,2* and Guibin Jiang1,2

7 8

1

9

Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research

10

100085, P.R.China, E-mail: [email protected], Fax/Tel: +86-10-62849334.

11

2

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, P.R.China

12

3

Institute of Environment and Health, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430000, P. R.

13

China

14 15 16 17 18

Corresponding author:

19

*

20

Fax/Tel: +86-10-62849334

Dr. Qunfang Zhou, E-mail: [email protected]

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

21

ABSTRACT

22

In view of the final destination of nanomaterials, the water system would be the

23

important sink. However, the environmental behavior of nanomaterials is rather

24

confusing due to the complexity of the real environment. In this study, a fresh water

25

ecosystem, including water, sediment, water lettuce, water silk, Asian clam, snail,

26

water flea, the Japanese Medaka, and the Yamato shrimp, was constructed to study the

27

distribution, bioaccumulation and potential impacts of CeO2 nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs)

28

via long-term exposure. The results demonstrated most of the CeO2 NPs deposited in

29

the sediment (88.7%) when the partition approached constantly 30 days later. The

30

bioaccumulated Ce in 6 tested biota species was negatively correlated with its trophic

31

level, showing no biomagnification of CeO2 NPs through this food web. CeO2 NP

32

exposure induced visual abnormalities in hydrophytes including chlorophyll loss in

33

water silk and water lettuce, ultrastructural changes in pyrenoids of water silk and root

34

elongation in water lettuce. The generation of hydroxyl radical (⋅OH) and cell wall

35

loosening induced by CeO2 NP exposure might mediate the increased root growth in

36

water lettuce. The findings on the environmental behavior of CeO2 NPs in water

37

system have provided useful information on the risk assessment of nanomaterials.

38

KEYWORDS: CeO2 NPs, aquatic microcosm, bioaccumulation, trophic transfer,

39

impact

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

40

INTRODUCTION

41

The development and application of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have rapidly

42

increased in diverse fields during the past decade. Like other emerging chemicals,

43

concerns have concomitantly arisen on their potential hazards ever since the

44

appearance of ENMs. As the ultimate sink for all pollutants, the aquatic ecosystem

45

plays important roles in the full life cycle of ENMs due to their intentional and

46

unintentional release1, 2. The behavior of ENMs in the aquatic ecosystem has thus

47

become an urgent issue in view of their risk assessment.

48

Nanoparticles (NPs) may be accidently or intentionally released to the aquatic

49

system via: (1) industrial discharges or domestic waste, (2) disposal of effluents, (3)

50

indirect surface runoff from soils, and (4) precipitation carrying NPs3-6. Once released

51

into the environment, manufactured nanomaterials can be transported or migrate in

52

the ambient media. Due to the different properties of the media, like water, sediment,

53

and biota, ENMs can be re-distributed and transformed biotically or abiotically, thus

54

causing changes in the physical and chemical characteristics of the particles.

55

Laboratory simulative experiments are widely used to investigate the aquatic

56

toxicology of NPs. It has been reported that metal oxide nanomaterials can cause

57

mechanical cell damage to algae through particle exposure and metal ion release7-9. In

58

contrast to the biomagnifications of certain nanomaterials in terrestrial food chains10,

59

11

60

relatively lower concentrations of nanomaterials in higher trophic organisms when

61

compared to those in lower trophic ones12-14. The estuarine mesocosms were

, the aquatic animals can directly take up and transfer ENMs in food chains with

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

62

constructed to study the fates and bioavailabilities of gold nanorods with different

63

charges in natural system, but the duration only lasted for 12 days, which did not

64

necessarily capture the chronic influences occurring in the natural environment15, 16.

65

Therefore, a better understanding of the transport and effects of nanomaterials from

66

long-term exposure is imperative.

67

Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) have become one of the most popular

68

nanomaterials in the past several years, and are currently being utilized in various

69

fields as catalyst, cell electrolyte, semiconductor, antioxidant, coating and polishing

70

chemical17-20. Its wide use would eventually cause the emerging exposure issue in real

71

environmental scenario like some other metal oxide nanoparticles, e.g. TiO2 NPs21.

72

The increasing concerns have been raised, regarding their potential adverse impacts.

73

Currently-available data shows that CeO2 NPs are more toxic than bulk CeO2, and

74

may induce cell death, oxidative stress and DNA damage22-24. Mesocosms were also

75

introduced to assess the impact of CeO2 NPs in aquatic ecosystem, and it was found

76

that CeO2 NPs were readily removed from the water column and partitioned between

77

different organisms25. The distribution and accumulation characteristics of CeO2 NPs

78

in various aquatic organisms were different26. The valence conversion from Ce (IV) to

79

Ce (III) occurred in the digestive gland of benthic organisms for both bare and coated

80

CeO2 NPs27. The size and surface modifications of CeO2 NPs obviously influenced

81

the temporal partition behavior of nanoparticles in aquatic system, their

82

bioavailability and toxicity to the biota species22, 23, 25. Nevertheless, previous studies

83

with food chains containing no more than three species could not fully represent the 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 35

Page 5 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

84

situation of a complete ecosystem or mimic the real environmental scenario. It was

85

thus of importance to study the long-term effect of CeO2 NP exposure in a water

86

ecosystem constituted by multiple abiotic and biotic components to clarify their

87

environmental fate and potential impacts.

88

In this study, we conducted 10-month investigations on CeO2 NPs in a

89

lab-constructed microcosm simulating real environmental scenario. CeO2 NPs were

90

spiked in the simulated fresh water ecosystem, and their distribution among water

91

column, sediments, water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), water silk (Spirogyra borealis),

92

Asian clam (Corbicula fluminea), snail (Physa acuta), water flea (Daphnia magna),

93

Yamato shrimp (Caridina japonica), and Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) was

94

monitored for 10 months. The carbon sources and trophic levels of the organisms

95

were analyzed by the determination of stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen

96

(δ15N). Using trophic transfer factor calculations, the bioaccumulation and

97

biomagnification behaviours of Ce in the tested food web were subsequently assessed.

98

The biological hazardous effects were specifically addressed on two tested

99

hydrophytes. This study has provided fundamental information on understanding the

100

transport and fate of CeO2 NPs in aquatic environment, which helps the enactment of

101

the related environmental management policies to reduce the potential negative

102

impact.

103

MATERIALS AND METHODS

104

Reagents. Bare CeO2 NPs with diameters of around 50 nm were purchased from

105

Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The working suspension (200 mg/mL) was freshly prepared 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

106

by directly dispersing the NPs (10 g) in 50 mL of the ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ•cm,

107

Millipore, Billerica, MA). N-Benzylidene-tert-butylamineN-oxid (Sigma, St. Louis,

108

MO) was used in the radical generation analysis. 37% HCl was bought from Merck

109

(Darmstadt, Germany). All the other chemicals were obtained from Sinopharm Co.,

110

Ltd. (Beijing, China).

111

Experimental setup and exposure design. The simulative aquatic system,

112

including three main components (water, sediment, and biota), was established to

113

compose the experimental microcosm in the glass tanks (40 cm in length × 20 cm in

114

width × 25 cm in height). In each tank, about 9 L of water and 3 kg sediment were

115

added, respectively. Three replicates were designed for both control and CeO2 NPs

116

exposure groups. The charcoal-filtered tap water was supplemented every week to

117

keep the constant volume (i.e. 9 L) of the established aquatic system. The temperature

118

(°C), light intensity (lux) and pH of the water system were monitored at around 12

119

a.m. every week and the data were shown in Figure S1, S2 and S3 (Supporting

120

Information), respectively. The light/dark cycle was constantly kept 16 hr/8 hr.

121

These ecosystems were constructed by natural water and sediment collected from

122

the dragon-shaped river of the Olympic Park, Beijing. The basal concentrations of Ce

123

in the sediment (below ng/g) were negligible. The microcosms were allowed to

124

equilibrate for 2 months prior to the start of CeO2 NP exposure. The species, including

125

water lettuce (P. stratiotes), water silk (S. borealis), Asian clam (C. fluminea), snail (P.

126

acuta) and water flea (D. magna), were commonly found in lakes or rivers in China.

127

The Japanese Medaka (O. latipes) was bred in our lab for generations, and the Yamato 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

128

shrimp (C. japonica) was bought from the local aquarium market. These organisms

129

comprise a food web naturally occurring in Asia.

130

The microcosm system in exposure group was gently spiked with 50 mL of 200

131

mg/mL CeO2 NP solution by stirring water for 10 s for the good dispersion. The

132

spiking was performed carefully to ensure the upper surface of the floating water

133

lettuce leaves free from NP solution splash. The exposure was lasted for 10 months,

134

and the volume of the water (9 L) and the amount of soil (3 kg) were approximately

135

kept the same during the whole study. All the samples including water, sediments, P.

136

stratiotes, S. borealis, C. fluminea, P. acuta, D. magna, C. japonica and O. latipes

137

were harvested when the exposure was terminated. Partial sampling was also

138

performed for two hydrophytes (i.e. P. stratiotes, and S. borealis) after 9-month

139

exposure for chlorophyll measurement, pathological observation and hydroxyl radical

140

analysis.

141

CeO2 NP and Ce analysis. A JEOL 2100F microscopy (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan)

142

equipped with Oxford INCA energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy suite was used to

143

measure the morphology and dimension of the CeO2 NPs. X-ray photoelectron

144

spectroscopy (XPS) was measured using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer

145

(Thermo escalab 250Xi, USA) with a monochromatic X-ray source of Al Ka. The

146

spectra were collected at the pass energy of 20 eV in the fixed analyzer transmission

147

mode.

148

For Ce concentration analysis, the samples, including sediments, P. stratiotes, S.

149

borealis, C. fluminea, P. acuta, D. magna, C. japonica and O. latipes were collected, 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 8 of 35

150

rinsed with ultrapure water for more than 5 times, and freeze-dried for 4 days, after

151

which they were ground to powder. The digestion protocol for the biota (0.2 g) and

152

water (1 mL) samples were performed using a mixture of HNO3 and H2O2 (2 mL; 3:2,

153

v/v) at 95 °C in 15 mL Teflon tubes for 4 hrs. The digestion protocol for the sediment

154

samples (0.2 g) was similar except that the acid mixture of HNO3, H2O2 and HF (2

155

mL; 1:1:1, v/v/v) was used. The resultant solutions were evaporated to about 0.5 mL.

156

The residue solutions were then diluted to 10 mL using ultrapure water. Ce

157

concentrations in the sample solutions were measured on an Agilent 8800 inductively

158

coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, USA).

159

Trophic level and food source descriptors. In order to determine the food web

160

structure and trophic levels of the organisms tested in the present study, we applied

161

the classic stable-carbon (δ13C) and stable-nitrogen (δ15N) isotope methods28-32. The

162

stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotopic ratios of all samples were

163

determined at Chinese Academy of Forestry (Beijing, China) using a flash 2000

164

EA-HT elemental analyzer interfaced with a DELTA V advantage isotope ratio mass

165

spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA). The isotope ratio was

166

standardized against atmospheric nitrogen or Pee Dee Belemnite (National Institute of

167

Standards

168

δ15Nsample=(Rsample-Rstandard)/Rstandard×1000‰, where R is the ratio of 15N/14N or 13C/12C.

169

Trophic levels (TLs) were determined based on the results of δ15N using Eq 1:

&

Technology,

Gaithersburg,

MD)

using

δ13Csample

or

170

TL consumer =2+(δ 15 N consumer -δ 15 N plankton )/∆N

171

where ∆N is the trophic enrichment factor (3.4 ‰). Trophic levels were assigned

(1)

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

172

relative to zooplankton (D. magna) which was assumed to occupy trophic level 2. The

173

trophic magnification factors (TMFs) based on the entire food chain were derived

174

from the slope of the plots of natural log concentrations (lipid normalized) versus TL:

175

Log[Concentrations]=a+bTL (2)

176

TMF=e b (3)

177

TMF > 1 indicates that the NPs are biomagnified, whereas TMF