Subscriber access provided by CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
Article
A laboratory comparison of emission factors, number size distributions and morphology of ultrafine particles from eleven different household cookstove-fuel systems Guofeng Shen, Chethan K. Gaddam, Seth M. Ebersviller, Randy L. Vander Wal, Craig Williams, Jerroll W. Faircloth, James J. Jetter, and Michael D. Hays Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 09 May 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 9, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
1
A laboratory comparison of emission factors, number size distributions and morphology of
2
ultrafine particles from eleven different household cookstove-fuel systems
3
Guofeng SHEN£, Chethan K. GaddamϮ, Seth M. Ebersviller$, Randy L. Vander WalϮ, Craig
4
Williams ф, Jerroll W. Fairclothǁ, James J. Jetterǂ,*, Michael D. Haysǂ
5
£. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Postdoctoral Fellow at U.S.
6
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 109 T.W. Alexander
7
Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
8
$. University of Findlay, 1000 North Main Street, Findlay, Ohio 45840, USA
9
Ϯ. John and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering and the EMS
10
Energy Institute, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
11
ф. CSS-Dynamac Inc., 1910 Sedwick Road, Durham, NC 27713, USA
12
ǁ. Jacobs Technology Inc., 600 William Northern Boulevard, Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA
13
ǂ. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 109 T.W.
14
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
15
*
16
4830; Fax: 919-541-2157; Email:
[email protected] Corresponding author: James J. Jetter, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Tel: 919-541-
17 18
Word count for the text: 4827
19
Word count for 5 Figures: 1500
20
Word count for 2 Tables: 600
21
Total words: 6927
22 23
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
25
Abstract
26
Ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions and particle number size distributions (PNSD) are critical in
27
the evaluation of air pollution impacts; however, data on UFP number emissions from
28
cookstoves, which are a major source of many pollutants, are limited. In this study, eleven fuel-
29
stove combinations covering a variety of fuels and different stoves are investigated for UFP
30
emissions and PNSD. Combustion of LPG and alcohol (~1011 particles per useful energy
31
delivered, particles/MJd), and kerosene (~1013 particles/MJd) produced emissions that were
32
lower by 2-3 orders of magnitude than solid fuels (1014-1015 particles/MJd). Three different
33
PNSD types; unimodal distributions with peaks ~30-40 nm, unimodal distributions with peaks
0.05, Figure S1). This is also the
149
case for EFs measured for most fuel/stove combinations at high- and low-power phases, with
150
the exceptions of [Kero-WS] and [Char-NDS] (p
