Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF WESTERN ONTARIO
Article
A Natural Component-Based Oxygen Indicator with In-Pack Activation for Intelligent Food Packaging Keehoon Won, Nan Young Jang, and Junsu Jeon J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04172 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Dec 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 1, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
2
A Natural Component-Based Oxygen Indicator with In-Pack
3
Activation for Intelligent Food Packaging
4 5
Keehoon Won*, Nan Young Jang†, and Junsu Jeon
6
7
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul,
8
30 Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
*Corresponding Author
17
Telephone: +82 2 2260 8922. Fax: +82 2 2268 8729. E-mail:
[email protected].
18
†
Present address: Dermapro, 30 Bangbaejungang-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06684, Republic of Korea
19 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
20
ABSTRACT: Intelligent food packaging can provide consumers with reliable and correct
21
information on the quality and safety of packaged foods. One of the key constituents in intelligent
22
packaging is a colorimetric oxygen indicator, which is widely used to detect oxygen gas involved
23
in food spoilage by means of a color change. Traditional oxygen indicators consisting of redox
24
dyes and strong reducing agents have two major problems: they must be manufactured and stored
25
under anaerobic conditions because air depletes the reductant, and their components are synthetic
26
and toxic. In order to address both these serious problems, we have developed a natural
27
component-based oxygen indicator characterized by in-pack activation in this study. The
28
conventional oxygen indicator composed of synthetic and artificial components was redesigned
29
using naturally occurring compounds (laccase, guaiacol, and cysteine). These natural components
30
were physically separated into two compartments by a fragile barrier. Only when the barrier was
31
broken for use, all the components mixed and started functioning as an oxygen indicator (i.e., in-
32
pack activation). Depending on the component concentrations, the natural component-based
33
oxygen indicator exhibited different response times and color differences. The rate of the color
34
change was proportional to the oxygen concentration. This novel colorimetric oxygen indicator
35
will contribute greatly to intelligent packaging for healthier and safer foods.
36 37
KEYWORDS: Colorimetric oxygen indicators, in-pack activation, laccase, guaiacol, cysteine,
38
intelligent food packaging
39 40
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 22
Page 3 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
41
INTRODUCTION
42
Food packaging is one of the main processes for maintaining food quality during transportation
43
and storage. In response to growing consumer demands over the past decades, a new food
44
packaging technology has been developed: intelligent food packaging.1 According to the
45
definition of the European Commission, intelligent food packaging contains components capable
46
of monitoring the condition of packaged foods or the surrounding environment.2 Therefore, it can
47
provide consumers with reliable and accurate information on food quality and safety, and it has
48
been attracting considerable attention as demonstrated by many recent scientific publications and
49
reviews.2–6 One of the key constituents in intelligent food packaging is an indicator, which
50
provides qualitative or semi-quantitative information on packaged foods by means of a color
51
change.4,5 Various variables related to food quality and safety (e.g., temperature, oxygen, carbon
52
dioxide, and volatile amines) have been monitored using various indicators.2–10
53
Oxygen is involved in microbial and biochemical spoilage of foods11 and thus is removed
54
from food packaging by modifying the atmosphere with gases such as nitrogen or by using
55
oxygen scavengers.3,12 However, oxygen gas can leak into the package over time because of air
56
permeation through the packaging materials, poor sealing, or the package being tampered or
57
damaged during transportation and storage. Therefore, the absence of oxygen should be ensured
58
using visual oxygen indicators.8,13
59
The most widely used oxygen indicator is a colorimetric redox dye-based indicator, which was
60
commercialized (e.g., Ageless Eye® manufactured by the Mitsubishi Gas Chemical
61
Company).8,13,14 This type of oxygen indicator is typically composed of a redox dye such as
62
methylene blue (MB) and a reducing agent such as glucose in an alkaline (NaOH) solution. In the
63
absence of oxygen, MB is reduced to its colorless form (leuco-methylene blue) by glucose in
64
NaOH solution; conversely, in the presence of oxygen, the dye is oxidized back to a highly 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
65
colored form, indicating oxygen in the package (Scheme 1a). However, the traditional oxygen
66
indicators have two major problems. One is that they must be manufactured and stored under
67
anaerobic conditions because they readily react even with air and stop functioning in a few hours
68
owing to the depletion of the reducing agent.3,13,15,16 This problem was addressed by two different
69
approaches.6 In order to preserve oxygen indicators until use, a novel oxygen indicator is
70
activated (i.e., switched on) only when UV is irradiated (Scheme 1b).15–18 As another effective
71
strategy, we recently reported a simple and practical oxygen indicator the components of which
72
are physically separated by an impenetrable barrier, which can be readily broken by simple
73
physical methods (e.g., pressing with hands). Only when the barrier is broken for food packaging,
74
all the components mix and start to function as an oxygen indicator (i.e., in-pack activation).19
75
The other problem with the conventional oxygen indicators is that some components (e.g.,
76
redox dyes and alkalis) are synthetic and harmful chemicals; they can contaminate packaged
77
foods and thus raise safety concerns in intelligent food packaging.8,20–22 In this study, we develop
78
an activation-controlled oxygen indicator all the components of which are existing in nature. The
79
traditional oxygen indicator composed of synthetic and artificial components is redesigned using
80
naturally occurring organic compounds [laccase, guaiacol, and cysteine (Cys)] (Scheme 1c).
81
These natural components are first used in the pressure-activated compartmented oxygen
82
indicator developed in our previous work. A natural component-based oxygen indicator
83
characterized by in-pack activation is developed and tested in the present study.
84 85
MATERIALS AND METHODS
86 87
Materials. Laccase from Trametes versicolor and all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-
88
Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and used without any further purification. The amount of laccase was 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 22
Page 5 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
89
expressed in terms of catalytic activity in enzyme units. One unit (U) of laccase was defined as
90
the amount of enzyme that converts 1 µmol catechol per min at pH 5 and 25°C. PET(12
91
µm)/ON(15 µm)/LLDPE(30 µm) film and LDPE film (70 µm) were obtained from Sunyang
92
(Korea) and Wowpack (Korea), respectively.
93 94
Preparation of the Oxygen Indicator with In-Pack Activation. The pressure-activated
95
compartmented oxygen indicator was prepared as previously described.19 The PET/ON/LLDPE
96
packaging film (4.5 cm × 3 cm) was pulled by a vacuum pump to form two wells. Typically, 185
97
µL of laccase solution (2 U/mL) was poured into one well (compartment I), and 185 µL of an
98
aqueous mixture of guaiacol (10 mM) and Cys (10 mM) was poured into the other well
99
(compartment II). All these solutions were prepared using citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5).
100
Subsequently, the rim of each well was tightly heat-sealed at 120°C for 2.4 s with the oxygen-
101
permeable LDPE film (4.5 cm × 3 cm) to prevent drying and leaking. However, the barrier film
102
between the two compartments was loosely heat-sealed at 70°C for 2.4 s so that it could be easily
103
opened (Figure 1). After activation, the concentrations of laccase, guaiacol, and Cys became 1
104
U/mL, 5 mM, and 5 mM, respectively.
105 106
Evaluation of the Oxygen Indicator. The oxygen indicators prepared with different
107
component concentrations were activated (i.e., the separator was broken with a hand) and then
108
placed in a gas cell. The cell was continuously supplied with a gas mixture of O2 and N2 (1, 10,
109
or 21 % oxygen) produced using an automatic gas mixing system (Sehwa Hightech Co., Korea).
110
The oxygen concentration in the gas cell was checked using an oxygen sensor (CheckPoint II,
111
PBI-Dansensor, Denmark). The gas cell containing the natural component-based oxygen
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 22
112
indicator was incubated at 25°C for 2 h, during which the color was monitored. All the
113
experiments were carried out at least in duplicate, and the data are presented as the mean and
114
standard deviation.
115 116
Analysis. The colors of the oxygen indicators were monitored using a portable
117
spectrophotometer (CM-2600d; Konica Minolta, Japan), which measures the spectral distribution
118
of the reflectance of samples and calculates colors. The colors were expressed as L* (lightness),
119
a* (redness-greenness), and b* (yellowness-blueness); the L*a*b* color space (also referred to as
120
CIELAB) is the most widely used in food color measurement owing to the uniform distribution
121
of colors.23 Color changes over time were determined numerically as an index of total color
122
difference (∆E):
123 ∆E = [(∆L*)2 + (∆a*)2 + (∆b*)2]1/2
124
(1)
125 126
where ∆L*, ∆a*, and ∆b* are the differences in L*a*b* between controls and samples.24 The
127
controls were samples at time = 0, and the color was measured at 4 points for each sample and
128
averaged.
129 130
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
131 132
Development of the Natural Component-Based Oxygen Indicator with In-Pack
133
Activation. In order to transform the conventional oxygen indicator into a natural component-
134
based oxygen indicator, a biocatalyst (an enzyme), its natural substrate, and a biological reducing
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
135
agent were introduced instead of traditional synthetic components. First, enzymes are biological
136
catalysts with high specificity and are perceived as natural, non-toxic food components.25 The
137
enzyme for oxygen indicators must convert its substrate into a product with a different color
138
using molecular oxygen. Oxidases such as laccase, ascorbate oxidase, and bilirubin oxidase can
139
be used as oxygen-reducing biocatalysts for oxygen indicators.26–28 Among the oxidases, laccase
140
was selected because this enzyme is stable, commercialized and promising for food industry (e.g.,
141
wine and beer stabilization, fruit juice processing, baking, and sugar beet pectin gelation).29 For
142
example, a commercial laccase preparation named Flavourstar is marketed for use in brewing
143
beer to prevent the formation of off-flavor compounds.30 Moreover, toxicological studies showed
144
that there are no reasons for safety concerns when using the laccase for oral care or in food for
145
human consumption.31 As a laccase substrate, 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate)
146
(ABTS) has been the most widely used in laccase activity assay and changes colors by the
147
enzymatic reaction; however, it is artificial and synthetic. In this study, we chose guaiacol, which
148
is a naturally occurring organic compound biosynthesized by a variety of organisms; it is one of
149
the key flavor compounds of coffee,32 rooibos tea,33 and wine,34 and is also found in rice grains as
150
one of the most abundant phenolic compounds.35 This natural compound forms a brown product
151
in laccase-catalyzed reactions (the molar extinction coefficient at 470 nm = 26,600 M–1 cm–1).36
152
The last component, a natural reducing agent must reduce laccase-oxidized guaiacol back to its
153
original form. Several biological reductants such as glutathione, Cys, and organic acids were
154
screened, and Cys was found to be the best (data not shown). Overall, the redox dye (MB) was
155
replaced with a biocatalyst (laccase) and its natural substrate (guaiacol), and the reducing agents
156
(glucose and NaOH) were replaced with a natural amino acid (Cys) (Scheme 1a and c).
157
Since enzymatic reactions are dependent on the pH of reaction medium, the pH of the natural
158
component-based oxygen indicator should be determined. The laccase from T. versicolor was 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
159
reported to have optimal pH ranges of 3.5 to 5 for activity and 5 to 8 for stability.37,38 By taking
160
both activity and stability into consideration, the pH was fixed at 5, and each component was
161
dissolved in citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5). The laccase solution was poured into one well
162
(compartment I), and the aqueous mixture of guaiacol and Cys was poured into the other well
163
(compartment II). By making the rim of each well tightly heat-sealed and the barrier between the
164
two wells loosely heat-sealed, the natural component-based oxygen indicator with in-pack
165
activation was finally produced (Figure 1).
166 167
Performance of the Oxygen Indicator. We examined the performance of the natural
168
component-based oxygen indicators with different concentrations of each component. Firstly, the
169
effects of reductant concentration were investigated; the final concentration (i.e., the
170
concentration after the two separated solutions were mixed by activation) of Cys was varied at 1,
171
2, and 5 mM, while the final concentrations of laccase and guaiacol were fixed at 1 U/mL and 5
172
mM, respectively. The natural component-based oxygen indicators were activated by rupturing
173
the impervious barrier with a hand (Figure 1). Immediately after the activation, the oxygen
174
indicators were incubated in a gas cell with 21% oxygen, and the ∆E values were monitored
175
using the portable spectrophotometer. For reference, the oxygen indicators activated were
176
initially colorless because of the reductant even though it had been stored and activated in air.
177
Figure 2a shows the time-course profiles of the ∆E values. At a low concentration (1 mM) of Cys,
178
the ∆E value increased rapidly and reached a constant value within 0.5 h. The color change over
179
time may be attributed to the colored oxidation products of guaiacol. Enzymatic one-electron
180
oxidation of guaiacol yields a phenoxyl radical, and the reactive radical subsequently forms a
181
colored mixture of dimers, trimers, and tetramers.39–42 As the Cys concentration was increased to
182
5 mM, the ∆E value increased slowly and took longer to approach the final value. This is because 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 22
Page 9 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
183
Cys reduced the phenoxyl radical of guaiacol generated by laccase; biologically derived thiols
184
such as Cys can scavenge various radicals including phenoxyl radicals and thus play a key role in
185
protecting cells from oxidative damage.43,44 The reduction of the phenoxyl radical by Cys
186
accelerates with increasing the Cys concentration. On the other hand, the final ∆E value of about
187
50 indicates a considerable color change. Generally, ∆E values below 1 are extremely small for
188
detecting color changes with the naked eye, whereas values above 2 are noticeable even to an
189
untrained eye.28
190
In Figure 2b, the effects of guaiacol concentration are shown. The final concentrations of
191
laccase and Cys were fixed at 1 U/mL and 5 mM, respectively, while the final concentration of
192
guaiacol was varied at 1, 2, and 5 mM. As the guaiacol concentration was decreased from 5 mM
193
to 1 mM, the rate of color formation declined, and the final ∆E value also dropped. Since the Km
194
value (the substrate concentration that gives a velocity equal to one-half the maximal velocity) of
195
T. versicolor laccase with guaiacol is 0.3 mM,37 the formation rate of the colored oxidation
196
products can decrease as the guaiacol concentration decreases from 5 mM to 1 mM. In addition,
197
the final ∆E value that indicates the final concentration of the colored product was proportional to
198
the substrate concentration. Regarding the effects of enzyme concentration, when the laccase
199
concentration was doubled with the final concentrations of 5 mM Cys and 5 mM guaiacol, the ∆E
200
value rose sharply and took shorter to reach the final value (from 80 min to 45 min) as shown in
201
Figure 2c. This is because of the increased rate of enzymatic guaiacol oxidation. This feature
202
makes it possible to control the response time toward oxygen by adjusting the concentration of
203
oxygen reduction biocatalyst, laccase. In this respect, the oxygen indicator in this study is in
204
contrast to other oxygen indicators with in-pack activation (e.g., UV-activated oxygen indicators),
205
which do not have a catalyst for oxygen reduction. The final ∆E value remained unchanged
206
because a catalyst affects a reaction rate, but has no effect on chemical equilibrium. 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 22
207
The dependence of the natural component-based oxygen indicator on oxygen concentration
208
was also investigated. After the activation, the natural component-based oxygen indicator was
209
placed in a gas cell with varying oxygen concentration (1, 10, and 21%), and its color was
210
monitored over time. The ∆E values after 2 h are shown in Figure 3. The rate of the color change
211
was proportional to the oxygen concentration as observed with other oxygen indicators,16,45
212
because oxygen is also a substrate of the chromogenic reaction catalyzed by laccase (Scheme 1c).
213
Considering that ∆E values above 2 (represented by the dashed line in Figure 3) indicate color
214
differences that are noticeable to an untrained eye, even the presence of 1% oxygen in the
215
package can be detected easily within 2 h using the novel oxygen indicator. The response rate
216
toward oxygen can be tuned by changing the concentrations of guaiacol, Cys, and/or laccase as
217
shown in Figure 2.
218
In conclusion, the natural component-based oxygen indicator with in-pack activation has been
219
developed for the first time. The conventional oxygen indicator composed of a redox dye, a
220
reducing agent, and an alkaline compound (e.g., MB, glucose, and NaOH) was completely
221
redesigned using natural compounds (laccase, guaiacol, and Cys). These natural components
222
were physically separated into two compartments. When the barrier to separate the two
223
compartments was ruptured, the oxygen indicator was activated and functioned as expected; it
224
changed colors in the presence of oxygen. Depending on the component and oxygen
225
concentrations, the natural component-based oxygen indicator exhibited different response times
226
and color differences. This novel, simple, and practical oxygen indicator addresses the problems
227
of traditional oxygen indicators. Hence the natural component-based colorimetric oxygen
228
indicator characterized by in-pack activation will contribute substantially to intelligent packaging
229
for healthier and safer foods.
230 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
231
Acknowledgements
232
This research was supported by the Agriculture Research Center Program of the Ministry of
233
Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea (ARC, 710003-03).
234
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
235 236 237 238 239 240 241
Page 12 of 22
References (1) Yam, K. L.; Takhistov, P. T.; Miltz, J. Intelligent packaging: concepts and applications. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70, R1–R10. (2) Ghaani, M.; Cozzolino, C. A.; Castelli, G.; Farris, S. An overview of the intelligent packaging technologies in the food sector. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 1–11. (3) Pereira de Abreu, D. A.; Cruz, J. M.; Paseiro Losada, P. Active and intelligent packaging for the food industry. Food Rev. Int. 2012, 28, 146–187.
242
(4) Heising, J. K.; Dekker, M.; Bartels, P. V.; van Boekel, M. A. J. S. Monitoring the quality
243
of perishable foods: opportunities for intelligent packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54,
244
645–654.
245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256
(5) Vanderroost, M.; Ragaert, P.; Devlieghere, F.; De Meulenaer, B. Intelligent food packaging: the next generation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 39, 47–62. (6) Realini, C. E.; Marcos, B. Active and intelligent packaging systems for a modern society. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 404–419. (7) Kim, K.; Kim, E.; Lee, S. J. New enzymatic time-temperature integrator (TTI) that uses laccase. J. Food Eng. 2012, 113, 118–123. (8) Mills, A. Oxygen indicators and intelligent inks for packaging food. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 1003–1011. (9) Vu, C. H. T.; Won, K. Bioinspired molecular adhesive for water-resistant oxygen indicator films. Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29, 513–519. (10) Jung, J.; Lee, K.; Puligundla, P.; Ko, S. Chitosan-based carbon dioxide indicator to communicate the onset of kimchi ripening. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 101–106.
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 22
257 258
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(11) Huis in’t Veld, J. H. J. Microbial and biochemical spoilage of foods: an overview. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 33, 1–18.
259
(12) Lee, K.-E.; Kim, H. J.; An, D. S.; Lyu, E. S.; Lee, D. S. Effectiveness of modified
260
atmosphere packaging in preserving a prepared ready-to-eat food. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2008,
261
21, 417–423.
262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275
(13) Smolander, M.; Hurme, E.; Ahvenainen, R. Leak indicators for modified-atmosphere packages. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 101–106. (14) Yoshikawa, Y.; Nawata, T.; Goto, M.; Fujii, Y. Oxygen indicator. US Patent 4169811, 1979. (15) Lee, S.-K.; Mills, A.; Lepre, A. An intelligence ink for oxygen. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1912–1913. (16) Lee, S.-K.; Sheridan M.; Mills, A. Novel UV-activated colorimetric oxygen indicator. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 2744–2751. (17) Vu, C. H. T.; Won, K. Novel water-resistant UV-activated oxygen indicator for intelligent food packaging. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 52–56. (18) Vu, C. H. T.; Won, K. Leaching-resistant carrageenan-based colorimetric oxygen indicator films for intelligent food packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7263–7267. (19) Jang, N. Y.; Won, K. New pressure-activated compartmented oxygen indicator for intelligent food packaging. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 650–654.
276
(20) Gillman, P. K. CNS toxicity involving methylene blue: the exemplar for understanding
277
and predicting drug interactions that precipitate serotonin toxicity. J. Psychopharmacol. 2011, 25,
278
429–436.
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 22
279
(21) Paul, P.; Kumar, G. S. Targeting ribonucleic acids by toxic small molecules: structural
280
perturbation and energetics of interaction of phenothiazinium dyes thionine and toluidine blue O
281
to tRNAphe. J. Hazard Mater. 2013, 263, 735–745.
282
(22) Dainelli, D.; Gontard, N.; Spyropoulos, D.; Zondervan-van den Beuken, E.; Tobback, P.
283
Active and intelligent food packaging: legal aspects and safety concerns. Trends Food Sci.
284
Technol. 2008, 19, S103–S112.
285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302
(23) Wu, D.; Sun, D.-W. Colour measurements by computer vision for food quality control–a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 5–20. (24) Pathare, P. B.; Opara, U. L.; Al-Said, F. A.-J. Colour measurement and analysis in fresh and processed food: a review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 36–60. (25) James, J.; Simpson, B. K.; Marshall, M. R. Application of enzymes in food processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996, 36, 437–463. (26) Ahvenainen, R.; Pullinen, T.; Hurme, E.; Smolander, M.; Siika-Aho, M. Package for decayable foodstuffs. WO/1998/021120, 1998. (27) Sakurai, K.; Kawashima, M.; Matsuki, Y.; Ueda, S.; Takahashi, M. Oxygen indicator and packaged material. WO/2004/083360, 2004. (28) Virtanen, H.; Vehmas, K.; Erho, T.; Smolander, M. Flexographic printing of Trametes versicolor laccase for indicator applications. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2014, 27, 819–830. (29) Minussi, R. C.; Pastore, G. M.; Durán, N. Potential applications of laccase in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 205–216. (30) Osma, J. F.; Toca-Herrera, J. L.; Rodríguez-Couto, S. Uses of laccases in the food industry. Enzyme Res. 2010, 2010, 918761. (31) Brinch, D. S.; Pedersen, P. B. Toxicological studies on laccase from Myceliophthora thermophile expressed in Aspergillus oryzae. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2002, 35, 296–307. 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
303
(32) Dorfner, R.; Ferge, T.; Kettrup, A.; Zimmermann, R.; Yeretzian, C. Real-time monitoring
304
of 4-vinylguaiacol, guaiacol, and phenol during coffee roasting by resonant laser ionization time-
305
of-flight mass spectrometry, J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5768–5773.
306 307
(33) Lasekan, O.; Lasekan, A. Flavour chemistry of mate and some common herbal teas. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 27, 37–46.
308
(34) Escudero, A.; Campo, E.; Fariña, L.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. Analytical characterization of
309
the aroma of five premium red wines. Insights into the role of odor families and the concept of
310
fruitiness of wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4501–4510.
311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322
(35) Setyaningsih, W.; Saputro, I. E.; Palma, M.; Barroso, C. G. Pressurized liquid extraction of phenolic compounds from rice (Oryza sativa) grains. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 452–459. (36) Roy, J. J.; Abraham, T. E. Preparation and characterization of cross-linked enzyme crystals of laccase. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2006, 38, 31–36. (37) Eichlerová, I.; Šnajdr, J.; Baldrian, P. Laccase activity in soils: considerations for the measurement of enzyme activity. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 1154–1160. (38) Kurniawati, S.; Nicell, J. A. Characterization of Trametes versicolor laccase for the transformation of aqueous phenol. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7825–7834. (39) Doerge, D. R.; Divi, R. L.; Churchwell, M. I. Identification of the colored guaiacol oxidation product produced by peroxidases. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 250, 10–17. (40) Hwang, S.; Lee, C.-H.; Ahn, I.-S. Product identification of guaiacol oxidation catalyzed by manganese peroxidase. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2008, 14, 487–492.
323
(41) Moshtaghioun, S. M.; Haghbeen, K.; Sahebghadam, A. L.; Legge, R. L.;
324
Khoshneviszadeh, R.; Farhadi, S. Direct spectrophotometric assay of laccase using diazo
325
derivatives of guaiacol. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 4200–4205.
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 16 of 22
326
(42) Jiang, C.; Ling, S.; Wang, P.; Liang, A.; Chen, B.; Wen, G.; Jiang, Z. A new and
327
sensitive catalytic resonance scattering spectral assay for the detection of laccase using guaiacol
328
as substrate. Luminescence 2011, 26, 500–505.
329 330
(43) Trujillo, M.; Alvarez, B.; Radi, R. One- and two-electron oxidation of thiols: mechanisms, kinetics and biological fates. Free Radic. Res. 2016, 50, 150–171.
331
(44) Valent, I.; Topolská, D.; Katarína Valachová, K.; Bujdák, J.; Šoltés, L. Kinetics of ABTS
332
derived radical cation scavenging by bucillamine, cysteine, and glutathione. Catalytic effect of
333
Cu2+ ions. Biophys. Chem. 2016, 212, 9–16.
334
(45) Son, E. J.; Lee, J. S.; Lee, M.; Vu, C. H. T.; Lee, H.; Won, K.; Park, C. B. Self-adhesive
335
graphene oxide-wrapped TiO2 nanoparticles for UV-activated colorimetric oxygen detection.
336
Sens. Actuators B 2015, 213, 322–328.
337 338
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
339
(a)
340
(b)
341
(c)
342 343 344
Scheme 1. Schematic illustrations of the working principles of (a) the traditional oxygen
345
indicator, (b) the UV-activated oxygen indicator, and (c) the natural component-based oxygen
346
indicator developed in this study.
347
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 18 of 22
348 349 350 351
352 353 354
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and working process of the natural component-based oxygen
355
indicator with in-pack activation.
356 357
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
60
(a) 50
∆E
40
30
20 1 mM Cysteine 2 mM Cysteine 5 mM Cysteine
10
0 60
(b) 50
∆E
40
1 mM Guaiacol 2 mM Guaiacol 5 mM Guaiacol
30
20
10
0 60
(c) 50
∆E
40
30
20
10
1 U/mL Laccase 2 U/mL Laccase
0 0.0
358
0.5
1.0
1.5
Time (h) 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2.0
2.5
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 20 of 22
359 360
Figure 2. Effects of the concentrations of (a) cysteine, (b) guaiacol, and (c) laccase on the total
361
color difference (∆E) changes of the oxygen indicator over time in 21% oxygen.
362 363
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
364 365
60
∆E after 2 h
50
40
30
20
10
0 0
5
10
15
20
25
Oxygen Concentration (%)
366 367 368
Figure 3. Total color difference (∆E) values of the oxygen indicator 2 h after activation with
369
different concentrations of oxygen (1, 10, and 21 %). The final concentrations of laccase,
370
guaiacol, and Cys were 1 U/mL, 5 mM, and 5 mM, respectively. The dashed line represents a ∆E
371
value of 2.
372
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
373 374
Table of Contents Graphics
375
376
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 22