An Analytical Perspective on ACOUSTIC EMISSION - American

Chertsey Road. Sunbury-on-Thames. Middlesex, TW16 7LN. United Kingdom. Shabtai Bittman. Agriculture Canada Research Station. Aggasiz, British Columbia...
0 downloads 0 Views 12MB Size
An Analytical Perspective on ACOUSTIC

EMISSION Adrian P. Wade and David B. Sibbald Laboratory for Automated Chemical Analysis Chemistry Department University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Y6 Canada

Mark N. Bailey Department of Metals and Materials Engineering University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1W5 Canada

Ron M. Belchamber Analysis and Instrumentation Branch British Petroleum Research Centre Chertsey Road Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex, TW16 7LN United Kingdom

Shabtai Bittman Agriculture Canada Research Station Aggasiz, British Columbia, VOM 1A0 Canada

John A. McLean Forestry Department University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1W5 Canada

Peter D. Wentzell Chemistry Department Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4J3 Canada

0003-2700/91 /0363-497A/$02.50/0 © 1991 American Chemical Society

Although analytical chemists have studied in detail the interaction of matter with electromagnetic radiation, heat, electrical energy, and electrical or magnetic fields, the relationship between sound and matter still receives comparatively little att e n t i o n in a n a l y t i c a l c h e m i s t r y . Sound, too, is absorbed and can be emitted by physical and chemical processes, and there are parallels between optical and sonic interactions (1). Existing sonic and ultrasonic techniques include ultrasonic resonance spectroscopy (2), acoustic attenuation (3), acoustic microscopy (4), photoacoustic spectroscopy (5),

REPORT the use of surface (6) and bulk (7) acoustic wave devices and (immuno)chemically selective microgravimetric sensors (8), and chemical acoustic emission (9). Acoustic emission (AE) is now the subject of research in areas such as analytical chemistry, experimental botany, entomology, and wood science. The diversity of these applications and the lack of interdisciplinary interaction has led to parallel development of similar instrumental techniques by different groups of scientists, each within their own discipline. This, in turn, has resulted in

fragmentation of the literature. In this REPORT, we will provide an interdisciplinary perspective on acoustic emission, including a brief overview of signal capture technology, a discussion of data analysis methods, and examples of applications.

Historical context Sound generation by physical processes is an everyday phenomenon, and evaluative techniques for AE are of interest across a broad spectrum of the n a t u r a l and applied sciences. Acoustic emissions are elastic waves generated by a rapid release of energy at a localized source; they are associated with bonding and reactivity. Emission occurs not only in the audible region (~ 10 Hz to 1 6 - 2 0 kHz), but also in the ultrasonic range (above 20 kHz). AE can be simple to detect but difficult to interpret. Modern AE research began in 1936 when Forster and Scheil (10) observed t h a t sound waves were generated during formation of martensite steel. In 1953, Kaiser (11) characteri z e d t h e e m i s s i o n b e h a v i o r of stressed m a t e r i a l s ; he discovered that on stressing, relaxing, and restressing a material, detectable AE is absent until previously applied stress levels are exceeded. This phenomenon is known as the "Kaiser effect." In 1964, Green (12) determined the integrity of a Polaris Model A3 solid rocket motor case using AE. Subse-

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991 · 497 A

REPORT quent progress in understanding AE from materials has led to AE proce­ dures for routine inspection of com­ mercial aircraft, pressure vessels, load-bearing structures, and compo­ nents. The 1970s saw reports of AE from chemical systems, but it was not until 1981 that the possible ex­ tent of emission activity from chemi­ cal reactions was realized, when Betteridge and co-workers studied a wide range of reactions (9). Since 1981, the Journal of Acoustic Emission (published by the Acoustic Emission Group, University of California, Los Angeles) has reported advances in AE in materials science and nonde­ structive testing, and has provided a forum for promotion of AE.

quency dependent. If the transducer is close to the source it is difficult to separate energy arriving by different transmission modes. Much remains to be learned regarding the genera­ tion and travel of transient waves in solids. A general, quantitatively ac­ curate description of the conduct of AE in solids is currently unavailable. In chemistry, a wide variety of pro­ cesses cause AE. These include gas evolution (e.g., in pyrolysis, electroly­ sis, and enzyme reactions), crystal growth (e.g., during solid-solid phase transitions), crystal fracture during recrystallization, cavitation, boiling, and swelling. This diversity further complicates development of theory, although progress is being made.

Theory

Experimental considerations

Sound is propagated through air as a longitudinal wave, that is, as succes­ sive compressions and rarefactions of molecules along the direction of prop­ agation. The velocity of sound varies with the medium through which it is propagating: In dry air at sea level at 20 °C it is 343.2 ms _ 1 (Machl); in wa­ ter, 1498 ms" 1 ; in copper, 3800 ms" 1 ; and in iron, 5000 m s - 1 . For ideal gases, the velocity of sound can be shown to be proportion­ al to the square root of the absolute t e m p e r a t u r e a n d i n d e p e n d e n t of pressure. However, factors such as temperature and moisture content change the velocity in air, and both increasing temperature and salinity increase the speed of sound in water (13). Sound waves propagate from their source in all directions, and the observed sound intensity decreases with increasing distance from the source. In bounded systems, the ob­ served signals may contain compo­ nents resulting from echoes and oth­ er p h e n o m e n a . M a t e r i a l s exhibit nonuniform absorbance (attenuation) of different sound frequencies, and experimental a p p a r a t u s can have resonant frequencies. The first energy to arrive at the t r a n s d u c e r is t h e compressional wave, known as the P-wave. In liq­ uids and gases, this is the only mode of propagation, but in bulk solids transverse waves or shear waves (S-waves) also occur. These propa­ gate at a l i t t l e over half of t h e Ρ-wave's velocity, and hence reach the transducer after the first arrival of P-wave energy. In bounded solids, surface waves and more complex modes such as plate waves may be the dominant forms of propagation. Their velocities are usually lower than those of shear waves and in some cases may be fre­

Regardless of the emission source, similar apparatus is used to detect AE: a sensor, signal-processing cir­ cuitry, and a recording device. Figure 1 shows some of the equipment op­ tions that can be used. Frequency components present in AE signals from chemical reactions can reach 1 MHz (14) and perhaps beyond. Figure 2a shows a chemical AE signal from reaction of anhydrous aluminum chloride with water, and Figure 2b its power spectrum. A

background noise signal (Figure 2c) and its power spectrum (Figure 2d) are shown for comparison. A n i m a l s use a wide frequency range in communication and naviga­ tion. For example, sounds from the finback whale have been recorded in the 18-23-Hz frequency range, the male field cricket uses 3.6-4.4 kHz, and the bat uses 3 9 - 7 8 kHz (13). Frequencies used for health monitor­ ing can range from 1 Hz to 35 kHz. Sensors for AE. Conventional au­ dio microphones developed for the re­ cording studio offer an essentially flat frequency response from a few Hz to 20 kHz. These provide superior signal r e p r e s e n t a t i o n and conve­ nience, a t moderate cost, b u t are prone to interference from ambient noise. Even inexpensive devices do not suffer severe sensitivity losses below 12-16 kHz and have been used in chemical reaction monitoring (15). Commercial broad-band piezoelec­ tric sensors can reach 1-2 MHz, with special t r a n s d u c e r s capable of 4 MHz; piezoelectric devices used as sound sources can reach 25 MHz. The frequency response of piezoelec­ tric sensors is typically not flat (16), and devices with specific resonant frequencies and high immunity to ambient audible noise are widely

Figure 1. Experimental apparatus options for AE monitoring.

498 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991

REPORT used. Piezoelectric transducers that have high sensitivity and a flat frequency response over a wide range of frequencies are being developed in both i n d u s t r i a l and academic r e search laboratories. Lead zirconate titanate (known as PZT) is commonly used in piezoelectric sensors. Chemical synthesis of the sensor material is a multiplestep process; coprecipitation of zirconium and titanium salts with cupferron is one way to reliably achieve the required zirconium-to-titanium ratio, which is known to be critical for good piezoelectric properties. Final fabrication of the device is presently both an art and a science. Signal processing circuitry. The weak signal generated by the sensor is first fed to a preamplifier and/or conditioning amplifier. A band-pass filter serves to provides good discrimination against noise (e.g., by eliminating audible frequencies) and eliminates aliasing of high frequencies back into the observed frequency range. Some devices also output a pulse each time an incoming signal is detected, the magnitude of which is often proportional to the peak amplitude of the signal. Spectrum analyzers, consisting of a set of band-pass filters, can be used to separate the acoustic energy detected into perhaps 8, 10, or 16 discrete frequency bands. These bands usually cover the entire working range of the instrument. Audible-

range spectrum analyzers are common in the sound reinforcement ind u s t r y , w h e r e t h e y a r e u s e d in conjunction with graphic equalizers to provide optimal concert sound. Similar units capable of handling higher frequencies (to 100 kHz) have been used for rotating machinery in industrial materials processing and machine health monitoring, but this technology has yet to be applied to chemical analysis. Recording d e v i c e s . Signals can be counted, integrated, captured, or c h a r a c t e r i z e d in m a n y different ways, including by event counters, integrators, and high-frequency digitizers. The counting of acoustic events is simple and convenient, and it provides superior quantitative measurements when acoustic events have similar magnitudes and frequencies. Early work in experimental botany involved counting of audio-frequency emissions by ear. Counting of ultrasonic emissions is done using highspeed comparator integrated circuits and data loggers (17). A threshold is set to some level above background such that when an emission occurs this level is breached and the signal is noticed. Circuits include a delay timer to ensure t h a t only a single count is registered per incoming oscillating signal. C u r r e n t research seeks to develop low-cost portable event counters (18). Counting events may be inade-

Figure 2. Comparison of AE and background signal. (a) Typical waveform from hydration of solid aluminum chloride and (b) its power spectrum; and (c) spurious background signal and (d) its power spectrum.

500 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991

quate, however, for some quantitative applications because acoustic signals differ in both peak amplit u d e s and total energies. I n s t r u m e n t s are commercially available that approximate the total energy in each emission by weighted summation of the outputs of multiple event counters, each set to trigger at a different acquisition threshold. Another approach useful for fast emitting systems is to integrate the output either from a peak level detection device (19) or, better, a "true RMS" meter. Interference from intense but very short-lived transients resulting from electrical switching can be reduced by considering the total energy of acoustic events, r a t h e r t h a n their maximum amplitude alone. Early chemical AE studies used minicomputers with dedicated data acquisition cards (9). Portable systems based on digital storage oscilloscopes have recently been constructed for use in analytical chemistry (14), pulp and paper science (20), and e x p e r i m e n t a l b o t a n y . Typically, these capture multiple 1024-point signals with 8-bit resolution and send them to a microcomputer for later processing and interpretation. Instead, 10-MHz 8-bit flash digitizer cards internal to a microcomputer may fulfill this purpose. Data analysis There are several common approaches to analyzing audible and ultrasonic signals, regardless of their source. Acoustic spectral analysis. A convenient way to look at the frequency components in AE is to apply a fast Fourier transform (FFT) to each time-domain signal. Processing of a 1024-point raw signal yields information at 512 frequencies; the FFT thus emulates the function of a dedicated m u l t i c h a n n e l a n a l y z e r based on multiple band-pass filters but at a much lower cost. Plug-in signal-processing cards can achieve FFTs in 3 ms or less (i.e., 2000 times faster than a 12-MHz Intel 80286based microcomputer). The transformed data are usually viewed as a power spectrum, and power observed within various frequency ranges can be summed to provide better quantitative information. Averaged power spectra are preferred, because of the n a t u r a l variability of individual power spectra, and have been found to be reproducible over a period of months (14). Commonly, system parameters such as temperature in recrystallization and extension rate in polymer stressing studies (21) as well as applied po-

tential in electrolysis (22) influence the emission rate and intensity far more than they do the power spectrum. Subtraction of background spectra has been reported (16). Waveform analysis. The ability to identify the source of signals correctly is important. As shown in Figure 2, it enables signals to be separated from s p u r i o u s b a c k g r o u n d emissions (21). It also enables processes that produce AE by a number of different mechanisms to be studied (23), and changes in process conditions to be detected. Empirical approaches offer a useful alternative to complex theoretical models. Everybody knows that a bottle of lager beer that does not fizz on opening will probably not taste good. This is a purely learned response. Emission signals contain much information, but only certain features of the signal may be relevant to the analytical task at hand. Pattern recognition can a u t o m a t e the learning procedure and is ideal for dealing with AE signals. Betteridge and co-workers (9) were the first to use a pattern recognition technique to show the similarity between signals from various subsets of 34 different acoustically emissive chemical reactions. This work could be considered seminal, in that it addressed the issue of signal analysis from fresh p e r s p e c t i v e s . These methods are all the more attractive in view of recent phenomenal advances in signal acquisition hardware and laboratory computing power. M a n y p a t t e r n r e c o g n i t i o n techniques t h a t are now commonplace for analyzing and classifying more conventional chemical data are also applicable to chemical (and other) sources of AE. Although there have been relatively few papers in the scientific literature on pattern recognition of AE signals, some patents have been filed. Most of these are aimed at process and plant monitoring, where AE can sometimes provide unique physical and chemical information. Here the real-time, nonintrusive nature of AE monitoring can provide a very real advantage over other techniques. S t a t i s t i c a l p a t t e r n recognition t e c h n i q u e s fall into t h r e e m a i n groups: exploratory methods, such as principal components analysis (PCA), are used to visually examine complex data sets; u n s u p e r v i s e d l e a r n i n g methods, such as dendrograms (24), are used to detect the presence of distinct categories in the data; and supervised learning techniques, such as SIMCA, are used to assign data to

predetermined classes. These have all been applied to AE signal analysis (23, 25). Neural network techniques also show much promise (26). Raw digitized signals (signal amplitude vs. time) are not well suited to p a t t e r n recognition. T h u s , the shape of each signal is first represented by parameters that are calculated directly from the time record of the signal (e.g., rise time, half-life, RMS energy, and maximum amplitude). Typically, an appropriately chosen combination of perhaps only six descriptors will effectively describe the signal well enough that it can be correctly assigned to a signal class. For example, many authors studying the fracture mechanics of composites have used the five descriptors shown in Figure 3 (peak amplitude, signal duration, energy, counts above threshold, and rise time) to describe waveforms collected during static or fatigue failure of composites or their constituents. The frequency distribution of the signal is also c h a r a c t e r i s t i c if a broad-band transducer is used. Descriptors such as median frequency and bandwidth can be extracted from the power spectrum. The utility of multiple descriptors for class separation has been demonstrated (21, 23). This multidimensional "descriptor space," coupled w i t h t h e possibilities of spectral analysis and time series analysis, provides much to interest chemometricians. Without knowledge of the position of the acoustic source there is usually little to be gained in trying to describe the signal more precisely. Source location. Acoustic source

location using sensor arrays has been achieved in materials science, seismology, ultrasonic flaw detection, structural evaluation, process engineering, passive sonar, and location of animals (13). It is complicated when the medium through which the wave propagates is not homogeneous; in particular, problems are caused by passage through regions that have different wave velocities a n d by faults in the medium material. Applications Analytical chemistry. An early use (ca. 1350 A.D.) of AE for chemical analysis is reported in the Codex Germanicus (27): "If thou wilt try whether sulphur be good or not, take a lump of sulphur in thine hand and lift it to thine ears. If the sulphur crackle, so that thou hearest it crackle, then it is good; but if the sulphur keep silent and crackle not, then it is not good. . . ." AE from chemical reactions occurs as a series of short bursts, of 0.1-1.0 ms in duration, with peak energies per b u r s t of - 0 . 0 2 - 1 2 5 0 pW (9). Some reactions emit many thousands of bursts over a period of hours. Others, perhaps stimulated by a sudden change in pressure or temperature, are over very quickly. The complex waveforms seen result not only from the source of emission and background noise, but also from the many ways the signal can reach the receiver. Recent chemical AE studies have focused on general investigation of the AE phenomenon (9, 28-30), thermosonimetry (16, 31, 32), instrument development (19, 33), analysis of frequency domain information (14, 15),

Figure 3. AE signal and five parameters used by materials scientists to describe its waveform. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991 · 501 A

REPORT chemometric methods for character­ ization and separation of signals (21, 34), quantitative analysis (15, 23), and use of AE as a kinetic (21, 35) and mechanistic (15, 16, 22) probe. A commercial AE instrument de­ signed for analytical chemistry r e ­ search is still not available. More work is needed before the chemical origins of AE are fully understood. From the perspective of analytical chemistry, the potential of AE as a mode of transduction for quantitative chemical analysis is of special inter­

est. AE is an extensive property. A direct proportionality between acous­ tic activity and amount of material undergoing reaction is expected but is difficult to obtain in practice: Selfabsorption by the macroscopic sam­ ple and other effects may contribute to nonlinearity, which h a s been ob­ served for both low and high concen­ trations. Quantitative measurements from passive monitoring of spontaneous and stimulated chemical AEs have been demonstrated. Belchamber and

If it's LC, The YMC Catalog provides a comprehensive selection of high performance LC products, including several new chemistries available only from YMC: • a new line of polymeric gels developed by Mitsubishi Kasei for bio-separations • new chiral phases for polar to non-polar separations • 20 different silica and polymer based bonded phases for maximum selectivity • empty and packed columns from 1.0mm to 200mm diameter plus periph­ eral support accessories to keep your lab

at peak

^ffS>

efficiency. For a copy, j u s t call. For technical assis­ tance, call toll free 800YMC-6311.

co-workers (23) showed that, in the hydration of silica gel, the total inte­ grated acoustic signal increased with the weight and particle size of the silica gel a n d decreased with t h e moisture content of t h e particles. Other researchers have used acoustic detection in titration (36), precipita­ tion (21), and electrolysis (22). An earlier study showed t h a t a frog's heartbeat rate changed with the amount of calcium injected into it (37). This premature foray into quan­ titative biosensors was not pursued; aside from the experimental difficul­ ties noted in the paper, each set of experiments required a new frog. More recently, a novel chemically modified AE sensor was reported (15) that used bovine liver catalase im­ mobilized onto the surface of a piezo­ electric transducer (Figure 4) to selec­ tively determine hydrogen peroxide in solution. The catalase accelerates conversion of the peroxide to oxygen and water. Audible effervescence is detected from 0 2 bubbles produced at t h e t r a n s d u c e r . A linear working curve based on counting acoustic events was established for 2 - 1 2 5 mM hydrogen peroxide, and a large relative standard deviation and neg­ ative deviation from the line was ob­ served at a hydrogen peroxide con­ centration of 150 mM. Neither gas evolution nor AE signals were ob­ served from solutions containing be­ low 2 mM hydrogen peroxide. The high detection limit was attributed to diffusion processes and precluded the coupling of the system to peroxide producing oxidase reactions. A c o u s t i c e m i s s i o n as a k i n e t i c probe. Vanslyke has shown that one can fit model equations to cumula­ tive AE curves (35). He determined that for the hydration of alkali metal hydroxides, the best fit was obtained using a model that represented two simultaneous first-order processes: Integrated peak AE intensity(f) = A expi-^f) + Β exp (-k2t)

it's in here. YMC,

Inc.

51 Gibraltar Drive Morris Plains, NJ 07950 201 285-1776 Fax: 201 285-5389 Telex: 3719839 YMC IN UB CIRCLE 152 ON READER SERVICE CARD

502 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991

(1)

where kx and k2 are rate constants that differ by - 1 order of magnitude and (A + B) indicates the total emis­ sion after a long time. Crystal frac­ ture and gas evolution are two pro­ cesses proven to occur during this reaction, but there may be others. Measures other than "peak inten­ sity" have also been used (21), and this approach h a s been applied to other chemical systems. The start-up kinetics of an electrolysis cell have been monitored using a digitizer ca­ pable of a record length of up to 2 million samples (i.e., a 2 097 152point signal), 12-bit precision, and

acquisition rates > 2 MHz (22). Acoustic emission as a mecha­ n i s t i c probe. Different emission producing mechanisms can be detect­ ed by s e p a r a t i n g t h e i r acoustic

Figure 4. Selective chemical sensor based on passive AE.

signals into classes on the basis of their shapes, frequency domain char­ acteristics, and amplitude (23). These classes are associated with mecha­ nisms by visual or other observa­ tions. Lee and co-workers (16) were able to distinguish crystal growth from crystal fracture during experi­ m e n t s t h a t c o m b i n e d AE w i t h dilatometry. Wade and co-workers (21) suggested t h a t the dominant emission mechanism during recrystallization of salts such as potassium nitrate may be crystal fracture occur­ ring during growth. Wentzell and co­ workers (15) found t h a t different bubble evolution sites on an enzyme catalytic surface produce repeatable emission waveforms, and each has its own particular acoustic signature. The hydration of silica gel is a pro­ cess in which violent audible emis­ sion from gel granule fracture is ac­ companied by considerable emission at ultrasonic frequencies (14). A de­ tailed study of this reaction (23) used five descriptors (maximum ampli­ tude, variance, half-life, median fre­ quency, and bandwidth) to character­ ize each of 80 AE s i g n a l s . Five principal components (eigenvectors) were then extracted from the covari-

ance matrix of these data. These or­ thogonal (uncorrelated) linear combi­ nations of the original five variables were then ranked. Most of the (vari-

Figure 5. Principal-component projection of data from hydration of silica gel granules. Groups marked 1 and 4 are higher energy signals that were visually related to the cracking of the sil­ ica gel granules. Groups 2 and 3 are of lower en­ ergy and associated with gas evolution processes. Group 5 is of uncertain origin. (Adapted from Ref­ erence 23.)

NEW GENERATION IMAGING TTME-OF-FLIGHT S M S Provides chemical mapping with high spatial and high mass resolution. rime-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry is a powerful technique for providing a detailed analysis of the top monolayer of surfaces. A true surface sensitive technique, T0F-S1MS uses a low dose, pulsed primary ion beam to eject secondary ions from a sample with minimal surface damage. The result is extreme surface sensitivity, on the order of femtomolar concentrations, for the identification of molecular compounds in corrosion, adhesion, and contamination studies. The TFS line of modular TOF-SIMS instruments from CHARLES EVANS & ASSOCIATES offers configurations * which include static SIMS, direct ion imaging SIMS, microprobe imaging SIMS, and laser desorption/ablation SIMS. These 90 ν 90 '·( micrometer %mieroprohe 1images of AI MBaterconnects on a semi-conductor device shows a large area of contamination on 2 micron wide AI lines. The left and right images are ofNa ions and Κ ions respectively.

CHARLESEVANS&ASSOCIATES® SPECIALISTS IN MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION

301 Chesapeake Drive, Redwood City, GA 94063 (415) 369-4567, Telex 172747, FAX (415) 369-7921

Look for us at the ASMS meeting in Nashville, TN. CIRCLE 32 ON READER SERVICE CARD ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991 · 503 A

REPORT ance) information is retained in the first few members. Figure 5 shows the first two principal components (PCI and PC2). These contain the largest contribution to the variance and define a plane onto which the original data points are projected. The closer together the signals appear in the plot, the more similar they are. Clustering of the signals is a p p a r e n t , a n d m e c h a n i s m s were readily assigned to the clusters. The large intraclass variance makes it unlikely t h a t principal-component projection alone would provide enough evidence to confirm the presence of the four distinct signal types. G r e e n p l a n t s . Many species of green plants (e.g., tomatoes, cucumbers, sunflowers) emit acoustic signals during periods of water stress; emission frequencies extend to at least 300 kHz. This phenomenon was f i r s t o b s e r v e d by M i l b u r n a n d Johnson in 1966 (38). Over the next seven years, Milburn and co-workers provided m o u n t i n g evidence t h a t these sounds were caused by cavitation of the water columns in special conduits in plants, known as xylem vessels, that conduct water from the soil to the leaves. The water columns are under considerable tension (negative pressure, suction) when the rate of evaporation from leaves exceeds the rate of water uptake from the soil. Under conditions of water stress, such as a prolonged drought, tensions reach - 1 to - 2 MPa and may go as low as - 1 0 MPa. Acoustic emissions are produced by the sudden release of tension on the xylem cell walls when cavitation of the water columns occurs. It is widely believed that xylem vessels with the greatest diameters and greatest hydraulic conductivity are the most susceptible to cavitation. Cavitation is important because it reduces the capacity of plants to conduct water. In early investigations Milburn and co-workers focused on only the audible range; they u s e d c o n v e n t i o n a l audio e q u i p ment—a modified pickup head from a record player served as the transducer. Background noise resulted in no other reports on this phenomenon until Tyree and Dixon (39) used ins t r u m e n t a t i o n designed to detect structural failure in materials for ultrasonic AE. Since 1983, many studies have demonstrated the relationship between declining tissue water potential and AE. Although cavitation can be demonstrated in other ways, AE monitors the progression of water stress in plants nondestructively.

Ritman and Milburn (40) recently reported that audible and ultrasonic emissions need not coincide. They suggested that audible-range emissions are closely related to cavitation of the major vessels, whereas some ultrasonic emissions are not produced by cavitation. In contrast, Tyree and Sperry (41) have suggested that power spectra provide little information about cavitation events because the frequencies are attenuated differently depending on the hardness of the tissue conducting the sound, and transducers can suffer from harmonics or "ringing." Better a n d cheaper i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n for acoustic detection of plants (41) will help elucidate the relationship between cavitation and other physiological reactions to drought such as reduced growth, leaf senescence, stomatal closure, cell membrane dam-

age, loss of turgor, and reduced hydraulic conductivity. Already, there is research into use of acoustic detection for programming of irrigation in greenhouses. When the relationship of cavitation to other drought reactions is better understood, this information may become useful for breeding superior drought-resistant crops. Wood products. The rate of drying of woody tissues can be monitored via the AEs caused by fiber failures. Winter-cut trunk samples of eastern white pine and three hardwoods were found to emit ultrasonic acoustical emissions as they began to dry out (42). Waxing the ends of the samples sharply reduced the emission rate, indicating that much of the d r y i n g out of t h e t i s s u e s occurs through the cut open ends of the sap conduits. The rate for the (softer) pine was higher than those of the

Figure 6. Principal-component analysis of continuous AE from a leaking gas release valve and representative time domain plots of the acoustic emissions. (a) Acoustic power spectrum, (b) plot of principal component 1 versus principal component 2, and (c) plot of principal component 1 versus principal component 3. 1, slow leak; 2, moderate leak; 3, fast leak; E, electrical noise; T, remote tapping; B, remote hammering.

504 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991

hardwoods for the first three weeks. Difficulties in drying out log disks have been resolved by using acoustic monitoring in a feedback control loop (43). A high r a t e of fiber fracture emissions indicates when drying rates are too high; the drying process is then slowed by introducing steam (43, 44). H i g h - q u a l i t y , well-dried samples are thus obtained in minimum time. L e a k d e t e c t i o n . Processes t h a t produce emissions at a very fast rate pose special problems because it is often impossible to resolve individual events. Here, a broad-band t r a n s ducer is used to monitor the signal intermittently for a short period of time. A frequency analyzer or FFT of the digital record then provides frequency domain data suitable for pattern recognition. This approach has been used to monitor gas leaking through a defective valve (45). The power spectra for all signals (Figure 6a) were divided into 10 equal bands. The acoustic power in each band was used as one of the variables for PCA. A plot of P C I versus PC2 (Figure 6b) shows t h a t spurious background noises are easily discriminated against. There is a unique vector (the dotted line) that serves as an excellent quantitative measure of the leak rate. A plot of P C I versus PC3 (Figure 6c) discriminates electrical noise spikes from signals obtained at a slow leak rate. The signals shown on the PC plots are time domain representations of typical signals captured by a transient recorder. Metals a n d m a t e r i a l s s c i e n c e . It is in this domain t h a t most AE research and development has occurred. Monitoring of AE from metals and/or fiber-reinforced composites is now common for in-service monitoring, proof testing, welding, continuous monitoring of structures, and fracture mechanics research. Emissions are generated in metals by dislocation motion, grain boundary sliding, crystal twinning, phase t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s , crack i n i t i a t i o n , crack growth from fatigue or corrosion, and cracking of second-phase particles. Emissions are generated in fiber-reinforced plastic composites by m a t r i x cracking, m a t r i x splitting, debonding, fiber fracture, fiber pullout, and post-debond friction. The sources of AE can be located and correlated with the event or mechanism t h a t produced them. Early workers had little appreciation of the physics of wave propagation and detection, and some optimistic claims were made t h a t later

resulted in disillusionment. Theoretical d e v e l o p m e n t s since t h e l a t e 1970s have helped remove the mystique that once surrounded the subject. Acoustic emission monitoring has a unique ability to detect and locate AE generated as flaws in metals initiate and grow. In arc and spot welding, cracks in welds have been easily and reliably detected, with excellent correlation between emission activity and weld strength (46). AE is used to continuously "listen" to offshore oil rigs, bridges, nuclear reactors, pressure vessels, and aircraft wings for early warnings of possible defect growth. Harris and co-workers (47) have proposed empirical relations between AE amplitudes and crack growth rates in steels. Pao (48) h a s discussed several important principles of AEs, such as source mechanisms, signal dispersion, and source characterization. In fiber-reinforced plastic composites, AE has been used to monitor t a n k s and pipes. Many thousands of t a n k and vessel tests have been run using standard procedures set forth by the Society of the Plastics Industry and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Similar stand a r d s exist for reinforced plastic piping; these provide guidelines to determine the structural integrity of pipe, fittings, and joints. Acceptance criteria are based primarily on the emission rate at constant proof loads (to 110% of maximum pressure). Testing of fiber-reinforced plastic manlift booms on aerial personnel lifting devices (such as those used by electrical utilities to service overhead power lines) has proven to be one of the biggest applications. In general the procedures are similar to those used for t a n k s , vessels, and pipes, with special attention paid to the joints. As many as 50,000 tests on booms may have been conducted in t h e course of recertifying b u c k e t trucks. In typical tests, a composite material specimen is loaded quasi statically or by cycling, and AEs are recorded. The data are analyzed after the experiments to attempt to disting u i s h d i s t i n c t failure modes a n d track damage progression. In fracture mechanics, where acoustic monitoring is routinely used as a powerful tool, there is a wealth of theoretical knowledge regarding the origins and nature of AE signals. For some simple systems it is possible to predict the form of an AE sign a l from k n o w l e d g e of t h e size, shape, position, and orientation of t h e source. For example, phase changes in small spherical inclusions

in isotropic media lead to predictable AEs, provided t h a t the geometry of the test piece is rigorously defined (49). More often we are concerned with the inverse problem, t h a t is, having recorded a n AE we either want to identify or whose source we want to characterize. This problem, too, has been solved for some welldefined systems using deconvolution techniques (50). One recent method takes into account factors such as crack orientation, which causes the deconvolution method to produce erroneous results (51). A measurement system using five transducers mounted in different positions records an AE event, and a "moment tensor" is derived from the digital records of this signal. Eigenvector analysis enables the tensor to be separated into a mean component, a shear component, and a component known as the compensated linear vector dipole. It is possible to classify an AE source as either a tensile crack or a shear crack from the ratios of these three components. E n t o m o l o g y . In recent years much attention has been paid to the chemical signals t h a t insects use to communicate with one another. We have not fully explored the forms of sonic c o m m u n i c a t i o n t h a t m a n y groups of insects use. The chirping of a cricket, the clacking stridulation of a flying grasshopper, and the deafening din of cicadas after a periodic emergence are examples of what may be a n a n c i e n t form of s i g n a l i n g among some of the more primitive insect orders. There is a high metabolic cost to this form of signaling as it requires an energy expenditure an order of magnitude greater than the basic metabolic rate (52). Such signaling is not without risk as it might a t t r a c t conspecifics, p r e d a t o r s , or parasites. In addition to the acoustic emissions made by insects signaling each other directly, there is t r a n s mission of the song through the host plant (53). There are also the acoustic emissions t h a t insects generate as they feed on their hosts. These various components can be assessed by the judicious choice of broad bandwidth detectors and filters. A good example of this approach is the study by Fujii and co-workers (54) of the patterns of AE associated with termite colonization of wood. Typically, the sensor is placed on the outside of the wood sample that contains a colony, with an appropriate acoustic coupling between sensor and sample. As the size of the colony expands, the AE events multiply. Signals are attenuated by distance, but

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991 · 505 A

REPORT judicious placement of multiple de­ tectors can result in the localization of the feeding colony. Bark beetles have long been known to use ultrasound as a means of com­ municating with one another (55) and are known to favor colonization of distressed trees. Trees suffering from moisture stress during drought or drying out after felling are also a source of AEs (42). It is possible that tree colonizers such as bark beetles can detect and use these AEs. The future The quest for fundamental knowl­ edge and industrial application of AE is g a t h e r i n g momentum. P e r h a p s fastest progress can best be made by strong interdisciplinary interaction. Aspects of sonochemistry (56), in­ cluding chemical AE, will become more widely taught in colleges and universities. We can expect to see the development of more rugged and sen­ sitive sensors, and their application to a wider range of problems within the disciplines discussed above and elsewhere. There will be a broader use of multichannel analyzers and high-frequency digitizers capable of greater resolution. The vast data sets obtained by instruments capable of capturing multiple signals, or by si­ m u l t a n e o u s r e a d i n g of m u l t i p l e channels of frequency information, can only be analyzed by computer. Chemometricians (and their equiva­ lents in other disciplines) will devel­ op new automated methods of data analysis, and well-established signal analysis techniques will be borrowed from these other disciplines. There is the need for development of a rugged, sensitive, selective, miniaturized, quantitative chemical acoustic sen­ sor that can be dipped into solutions or used in flowing s t r e a m s . This acoustic sensor would be used simi­ larly to conventional electrodes and fiber-optic sensing. Real-time use of AE for industrial process control and laboratory monitoring of chemical re­ actions and other processes will be of special interest.

The authors thank J. C. Madden and the B.C. Advanced Systems Institute for initiating the scientific interaction that led to this paper, and D. Betteridge and A. Poursartip for helpful sug­ gestions. A.P.W. thanks the Institute for Chem­ ical Science and Technology for technical sup­ port. R.M.B. thanks the management of British Petroleum PLC for permission to publish this paper. References (1) Wade, A. P. Chem. Br. 1989, 25, 36163.

(2) Lai, E.P.C.; Chan, B. L.; Chen, S. Appl. Spectrosc. 1988, 42, 526-29. (3) Poursartip, Α.; Dorosh, M.; Nadeau, J. S.; Bennett, R. Acoustic Attenuation as a Measure of Damage to GFRP Rods; Rein­ forced Plastics/Composites Institute: Montreal, Canada, July 1986. (4) Nagy, P. B.; Adler, L. /. Appl. Phys. 1990, 67(8), 3876-78. (5) Coufal, H.; McClelland, J. F. /. Mol. Struct. 1988, 173, 129-40. (6) Fox, C. G.; Alder, J. F. Analyst 1989, 114, 997-1004. (7) Guilbault, G. G.; Jordan, J. M. CRC Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1988, 19, 1-28. (8) Thompson, M.; Dhaliwal, G. K.; Arthur, C. L.; Calabrese, G. S. IEEE Trans, on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 1987, UFFC-34, 12735. (9) Betteridge, D.; Joslin, M. T.; Lilley, T. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53, 1064-73. (10) Forster, F.; Scheil, Ε. Ζ. Metallk. 1936, 24, 245-47. (11) Kaiser, J. Arch. Eisenhuettenwes. 1953, 24, 43-45. (12) Green, A. T.; Lockman, C. S.; Steele, R. K. Mod. Plast. 1963, 41(11), 137-39. (13) Spiesberger, J. L.; Fristrup, Κ. Μ. Am. Nat. 1990, 135, 107-53. (14) Wentzell, P. D.; Wade, A. P. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 2638-42. (15) Wentzell, P. D.; Vanslyke, S. J.; Bateman, K. P. Anal. Chim. Acta, in press. (16) Lee, O.; Koga, Y.; Wade, A. P. Talanta 1990, 37(9), 861-73. (17) Tyree, M. T.; Dixon, Μ. Α.; Thomp­ son, R. G. Plant Physiol. 1984, 74, 104649. (18) Tyree, M. T.; Sperry, J. S. Plant Cell Environ. 1989, 12, 371-82. (19) Wentzell, P. D.; Vanslyke, S. J.; Wade, A. P. Trends Anal. Chem. 1990, 9(1), 3-8. (20) Dumont, G. Α.; Wade, A. P.; Lee, O. PCT Int. Appl. CA 90 00,015, 1990. (21) Wade, A. P.; Chow, P.Y.T.; Soulsbury, Κ. Α.; Brock, I. H. Anal. Chim. Acta, in press. (22) Crowther, T. G.; Wade, A. P.; Went­ zell, P. D.; Gopall, R., unpublished re­ sults. (23) Belchamber, R. M.; Betteridge, D.; Collins, M. P.; Marczewski, C. Z.; Wade, A. P. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 1873-77. (24) Sibbald, D. B.; Wentzell, P. D.; Wade, A. P. Trends Anal. Chem. 1989, 8(8), 28991. (25) Belchamber, R. M.; Betteridge, D.; Chow, Y. T.; Lilley, T.; Cudby, M.E.A. /. Acoustic Emission, 1985, 4, 71-83. (26) Zgonc, K.; Grabec, I. "A Neural-Like System Applied to Acoustic Emission Analysis"; Intl. Neural Network Confer­ ence, (IEEE/International Neural Net­ work Society), Paris, July 9-13, 1990. (27) Codex Germanicus (ca. A.D. 1350), p. 75 in Read, J. Prelude to Chemistry; Bell: London, 1939. (28) Van Ooijen, J.A.C.; van Tooren, E.; Reedijk, J. /. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 5569-70. (29) Sawada, T.; Gohshi, Y.; Abe, C ; Furaya, K. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 174345. (30) Sawada, T.; Gohshi, Y. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 366-67. (31) Clark, G. M. Thermochim. Acta 1979, 34, 365-75. (32) L0nvik, K. Thermochim. Acta 1987, 110, 253-64. (33) Lee, O.; Wentzell, P. D.; Boyd, D. Α.; Wade, A. P. Trends Anal. Chem. 1990, 9(7), 217-22. (34) Brock, I. H.; Lee, O.; Soulsbury,

506 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991

Κ. Α.; Sibbald, D. B.; Wentzell, P. D.; Wade, A. P. Presented at the FACSS Conference, Cleveland, OH, October 1990; paper 990. (35) Vanslyke, S. J. B.Sc. Thesis, Univer­ sity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1989. (36) Ranke-Madsen, E. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 1957. (37) McLean, F.; Hastings, A. B. / Biol. Chem. 1934, 107, 337-50. (38) Milburn, J. Α.; Johnson, R.P.C. Plant 1966, 69, 43-52. (39) Tyree, M. T.; Dixon, M. A. Plant Phys­ iol. 1983, 72, 1094-99. (40) Ritman, K. T.; Milburn, J. A. /. Exp. Bot. 1988, 39, 1237-48. (41) Tyree, M. T.; Sperry, J. S. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Molec. Biol. 1989, 40, 1938. (42) Haack, R. Α.; Blank, R. W.; Fink, F. T.; Mattson, W. J. Fla. Entomol. 1988, 71, 427-40. (43) Honeycutt, R. M.; Skaar, C; Simp­ son, W. T. Forest Prod. J. 1985, 35, 4 8 50. (44) Noguchi, M.; Kityama, S.; Satoyoshi, K.; Umetsu, J. Forest Prod. ]. 1987, 37, 28-34. (45) Belchamber, R. M.; Collins, M. P., unpublished results, 1990. (46) Stephens, R.; Kim, H. In Acoustic Emission—A Diagnostic Tool in NonDestructive Testing; Szilard, J. R., Ed.; John Wiley: New York, 1982; pp. 45989. (47) Harris, D.; Dunnegan, H.; Tetelman, A. Technical Bulletin DRC 105; Dunnegan Engineering Consultants Inc.: San Juan Capistrano, CA, 1983. (48) Pao, Y. S. Theory of Acoustic Emission; ASM£1978;pp. 107-28. (49) Simmons, J. Α.; Wadley, H.N.G. /. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. (US) 1984, 89, 5 5 64. (50) Hsu, N.; Simmons, J. Α.; Hardy, S. Mater. Eval. 1977, 35, 100-106. (51) Ohtsu, M. NDTInt. 1989, 22, 14. (52) Burk, T. Fla. Entomol. 1988, 71, 40009. (53) Michelsen, A. F.; Finck, A. F.; Gogala, M.; Traune, D. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1982, 11, 269-81. (54) Fujii, Y.; Noguchi, M.; Imamura, Y.; Tokoro, M. Forest Prod. J. 1990, 40, 3436. (55) Rudinsky, J. Α.; Michael, R. R. Sci­ ence 1975, 175, 1386-90. (56) Lorimer, J. T.; Mason, P. J. Sono­ chemistry—Theory, Applications and Uses of Ultrasound in Chemistry; Ellis Horwood Series in Physical Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1988.

Adrian P. Wade obtained his B.Sc. in chemistry with computer studies from Southampton University in 1981 and his Ph.D. in analytical chemistry from Uni­ versity College Swansea, University of Wales, in 1985. After postdoctoral work with S. R. Crouch and C. G. Enke at

'1990's Michigan State University, he joined the search interests include on-line spectrosfaculty of the Chemistry Department at the copy, process acoustic measurements, and University of British Columbia (UBC) in analytical instrumentation. 1987. His research interests include flow injection analysis, chemical acoustic emission, chemometrics, and artificial intelligence.

Mark N. Bailey received both his B. A. Sc. in mechanical engineering (1985) and his M. A. Sc. in metals and materials enDavid B. Sibbald received his B.Sc. in gineering (1988) from UBC. He is curchemistry, with a minor in computer sci- rently an engineering consultant in mateence, from UBC in 1987 and completed rials failures for Macinnis Bigg hisM.Sc. in chemistry in 1990. His inter- Associates, Vancouver. ests include chemical acoustic emission and chemometrics.

John A. McLean, a professor in the Department of Forest Sciences at UBC, obShabtai Bittman obtained his B.Sc. in bi- tained his B.Sc. (1965) and M.Sc. ology in 1972 and his M.Sc. in agronomy (1968) from the University of Auckland, in 1975 from McGill University. He re- New Zealand, and his Ph.D. from Simon ceived his Ph.D. in crop science from theFraser University, B.C. (1976). His maUniversity of Saskatchewan in 1985. Hejor research interests are the ecology and was a biologist and research scientist withmanagement of forest insects, especially Agriculture Canada research stations in the semiochemical ecology of ambrosia Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan from beetles, and the utilization of semiochemi1977 until joining the Agassiz Research cals in pest management systems to reduce Station, B.C., in 1987. His current re- the economic impact of these insects. search concerns are the improvement of yield and nutritional quality of forage crops and reducing the environmental impact of farming practices.

Peter D. Wentzell obtained a B.Sc. from Dalhousie University (1982) and his Ph.D. from Michigan State University (1987). After completing postdoctoral Ron M. Belchamber is leader of the Pro- work with A. P. Wade at UBC, he joined cess Analysis and Automation Team at the faculty of Dalhousie University as an the British Petroleum (BP) Research Cen-assistant professor in 1989, where he is a tre, Sunbury-on-Thames, U.K. He ob- member of the Trace Analytical Research tained his B.Sc in chemistry from Imperi- Centre in the Chemistry Department. His al College, London University, in 1975, current research interests are in the areas and his Ph.D. from the University of Al- of chemometrics (with emphasis on digiberta in 1981. He was a postdoctoral re- talfilteringand response surface methodsearch associate at University College ologies), flow injection analysis, and Swansea until joining BP in 1982. His re- chemical sensors.

VersaStat™ Versatile Potentiostat

The Premium Quality You Expect pom EG&G PARC — at an Unexpected Price We're proud to introduce the VersaStat — a premium potentiostat in the tradition of our model 1970's The Model 173 273, at under Potentiostat half the price. How were we able to do this? Our free HeadStart software functions as a versatile front panel, letting you tap the full power of our unique Electrochemical Command Set. Plus, the VersaStat 1980-s performs The Model 273 research electrochemistry smoothly under the control of our timetested Model 250 software, specially adapted from our widely-used Model 270 research package. Finally, to keep hardware costs down, we limited the VersaStat's specifications, but still designed it to perform as a premium potentiostat in most applications. So if you're looking for the best cost/performance value to hit the potentiostat market, try the VersaStat. You'll find out the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree.

EG&G PARC P.O. BOX 2565 · PRINCETON, NJ 08543-2565 (609) 530-1000 · TELEX: 843409 · FAX: (609) 883-7259

CIRCLE 34 ON READER SERVICE CARD ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 9, MAY 1, 1991 · 507 A