ANTIBIOTIC MAY SIDESTEP RESISTANCE DRUG DISCOVERY: Bacteria may find agent’s mechanism hard to circumvent
R
ESEARCHERS FINALLY KNOW exactly how the
promising antibiotic GE23077 (GE) inhibits an essential bacterial enzyme. They predict that GE’s ability to hit this enzyme in its active site could make it difficult for bacteria to develop resistance to the agent. The study also shows how GE might be conjugated with another antibiotic to make a combination drug the scientists believe might be unusually resistance-proof. Some bacterial infections are difficult or impossible to treat effectively because bacteria evolve to eliminate antibiotic efficacy, and too few new antibacterial agents have been developed in recent years. The tendency of GE and GE conjugates to evade resistance has yet to be confirmed, but the study points to one possible way to sidestep antibiotic resistance. In 2001, an Italian screening study found that the cyclic peptide natural product GE expressed antibiotic activity by inhibiting the essential bacterial enzyme RNA polymerase (RNAP). A 2004 patent covering the molecule is now owned by the biotech company Naicons, in Milan, Italy. DNA transcription specialist Richard H. Ebright of Rutgers University, Piscataway, and coworkers, including two Naicons researchers, have now figured out that GE does its job by hitting RNAP’s active site (eLife 2014, DOI: 10.7554/eLife.02450). They predict this would make it difficult for bacteria to modify themselves to evade GE while also maintaining RNAP activity.
Rifamycin antibiotics bind to an adjacent site in RNAP and inhibit the enzyme in a different way than GE does. Ebright and coworkers found that a conjugate of GE and a specific rifamycin—rifamycin SV—has higher potency than GE or rifamycin SV alone, and they predict it would evade bacterial resistance more effectively as well. Although GE has trouble getting past cell membranes of some bacteria, conjugating GE to a molecule that more readily enters cells might solve that problem, Ebright says. Rutgers has filed a patent application on GErifamycin conjugates. RNAP expert Robert Landick of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, comments that GE “is probably the first inhibitor that actually binds in the active site, as opposed to around it.” But he isn’t convinced conjugation will solve its cell entry problems. “Making a larger molecule by conjugation, while intriguing, may increase the challenge of SIDE BY SIDE Rifamycin SV (yellow cell accessibility,” he says. stick structure) and GE23077 (blue stick Jennifer A. Leeds, execustructure) bind to adjacent sites on tive director of antibacterial RNA polymerase (red and green). Mesh discovery at Novartis, notes indicates electron density; purple ball is that “more validation of the active site’s magnesium ion. hypothesis that GE is unlikely to be eroded by clinical resistance is still needed. But there is potentially huge value in this study because it tells you a lot about the mechanism of RNAP, and the fact that GE and rifamycins have nonoverlapping resistance mechanisms is exciting.” Ebright says his team now plans to synthesize and evaluate additional GE conjugate inhibitors and develop a total synthesis of GE.—STU BORMAN
SCIENCE POLICY National Science Board warns pending bill could damage NSF peer review In a rare response to pending legislation, the National Science Board has warned that a bill before the House of Representatives Science, Space & Technology Committee could damage the National Science Foundation. The science board is the governing body of NSF. The Frontiers in Innovation, Research, Science & Technology (FIRST) Act (H.R. 4186) would require an NSF official to personally affirm that grant awards are in the national interest. Additionally, it would give Congress more direct control over funding for individual NSF directorates. Introduced in March, the bill is
currently pending before the Science Committee. This legislation, the science board cautions, could end up discouraging visionary grant proposals or the pursuit of transformative science. “Some of its provisions and tone suggest that Congress intends to impose constraints that would compromise NSF’s ability to fulfill its statutory purpose,” the science board said in a statement. The board says it is working with NSF to put in place new processes that increase transparency and account-
CEN.ACS.ORG
9
MAY 5, 2014
ability in its grant-making process; the changes, it contends, make the pending bill unnecessary. However, Rep. Lamar S. Smith (RTexas), the bill’s author and chair of the House science committee, says the new processes are too little, too late. He adds that the changes would still not require the affirmation that grants are in the national interest. “The NSF wants to be the only federal agency to get a blank check signed by taxpayers, without having to justify how the money is spent,” Smith says.— ANDREA WIDENER
RICHARD EBRIGHT
NEWS OF TH E WEEK
