Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF DURHAM
Article
Bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface for reducing residual liquid food Yao Li, Jingran Bi, Siqi Wang, Tan Zhang, Xiaomeng Xu, Haitao Wang, Shasha Cheng, Bei-Wei Zhu, and Mingqian Tan J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05915 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Feb 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 15, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Bio-inspired
edible
super-hydrophobic
2
reducing residual liquid food
interface
for
3 4
Yao Li,abc Jingran Bi,ab Siqi Wang,ab Tan Zhang,ab Xiaomeng Xu,ab Haitao Wang,ab Shasha Cheng,ab
5
Bei-Wei Zhuabc* and Mingqian Tanab*
6 7
a
8
District, Dalian, Liaoning 116034, People’s Republic of China
9
b
School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Qinggongyuan1, Ganjingzi
National Engineering Research Center of Seafood, Dalian, Liaoning 116034, People’s Republic of
10
China
11
c
12
266000, People’s Republic of China
State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Seaweed Substances, Huangdao district, Qingdao, Shandong,
13 14
*Corresponding author (Tel& Fax: +86-411-86318657, E-mail:
[email protected];
15
[email protected], ORCID: 0000000275350035).
16 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
18
Abstract:
19
Significant wastage of residual liquid food, such as milk, yogurt, and honey, in food container has
20
attracted great attention. In this work, a bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface was fabricated
21
using the FDA-approved and edible honeycomb wax, arabic gum, and gelatin by a simple and low-cost
22
method. The bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface showed multiscale structures, which were
23
similar to that of lotus leaf surface. This bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface displayed high
24
contact angles for a variety of liquid foods and the residue of liquid foods could be effectively reduced
25
using the bio-inspired interface. To improve the adhesive force of the super-hydrophobic interface, a
26
flexible edible elastic film was fabricated between the interface and substrate materials. After being
27
repeatedly folded and long-time flushed, the interface still maintained excellent super-hydrophobic
28
property. The bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface showed a good biocompatibility which
29
may have potential applications as a functional packaging interface material.
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 29
Page 3 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
40
1. Introduction
41
In recent years, great efforts have been made to alleviate the global food crisis.1-2 Nevertheless,
42
there is a significant waste of residual liquid foods such as milk, yogurt, and honey adhered to the
43
inside of food container when they are poured out. If the residual liquid food in the container can be
44
reduced, it would be helpful to save food. One strategy to reduce the residual liquid food is to employ
45
bio-inspired super-hydrophobic films, which are extremely repellent to water and can reduce the
46
adhesion between the container and liquid food products. 3-5
47
The inspiration of bio-inspired super-hydrophobic film comes from the natural world. In the long
48
evolutionary process, certain plant leaf like lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) exhibits special wettability, to
49
avoid the adhesion of residual water.6-7 On the surface of lotus leaf, water droplets are almost spherical
50
and can roll freely. The special wettability of lotus leaf is due to two main factors: chemical
51
composition to impart low solid surface energy, and multiscale structures to enhance hydrophobicity on
52
the lotus leaf surface. The cooperation of the chemical composition and multiscale structures result in
53
an excellent super-hydrophobicity, resulting in a high water contact angle and a small sliding angle.8-15
54
For special wettability, many strategies have been developed to construct the super-hydrophobic
55
surfaces by an electrostatic spinning technique to manufacture micro/nanoscale structures using
56
hydrophobic polymer.16-19 However, the electrostatic spinning technique is prohibitively expensive,
57
high-voltage and uncontrollable in large-area fabrication. The other attractive approach is the use of
58
long-chain fluorocarbon materials with low surface energy.20-21 However, the long-chain fluorocarbon
59
material has safety concern to humans due to its bio-accumulative and toxic effects. Therefore, an ideal
60
super-hydrophobic surface material should be non-toxic and edible, thus eliminating toxicity of the film
61
materials during food applications.22-26 In addition, the preparation method of super-hydrophobic
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
62
surface should be simple, low cost and controllable in large-area fabrication for potential commercial
63
applications. The traditional preparation methods of super-hydrophobic surface are not suitable for the
64
flexible surface of food applications.27-29 Therefore, it is a great challenge to design and develop an
65
ideal super-hydrophobic interface on a flexible surface in food packing.
66
In this work, edible honeycomb wax, a U.S. food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and
67
edible material, was used as main matrix material to fabricate super-hydrophobic interface by a simple
68
microemulsion spraying method.30 A unique microstructure of honeycomb wax was formed via the
69
simple, low-cost and scalable spray-coating process. The formed honeycomb wax interface possesses
70
super-hydrophobic property on which water and liquid food products including Lipton green tea,
71
Gatorade, Coca-Cola, orange juice, whole milk, coffee and honey can roll freely in all directions.
72
Moreover, an edible elastic film was fabricated between the honeycomb wax and matrix material, such
73
as plastic film, to enhance the adhesion of super-hydrophobic interface for the application in flexible
74
substrates. In vitro cytotoxicity test was carried out to investigate the viability of cells upon contacting
75
the super-hydrophobic interface. This is a significant attempt to apply natural food as a functional
76
packaging interface material.
77
2. Experimental
78
2.1 Materials
79
Lipton green tea, Gatorade, Coca-Cola, orange juice, whole milk, coffee (Nescafe® Smoovlatte
80
containing water, milk, instant coffee, sugar, thickener 460i and 466, stabilizer 500 ii, acidity regulator
81
331iii and emulsifier 473, flavouring essence) and honey were purchased from local grocery market
82
(Dalian, China). Arabic gum, gelatin (from porcine skin), honeycomb wax and 3-(4,
83
5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Aldrich
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 29
Page 5 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
84
Chemical Co. (Shanghai, China). Mouse osteoblast cell line was purchased from the Cell Bank of Type
85
Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Unless otherwise stated,
86
acetone and other chemicals were purchased from commercial vendors and used without further
87
purification.
88
2.2 Preparation of edible elastic film
89
The edible super-hydrophobic interface was prepared as outlined in Scheme 1. Arabic gum (0.6 g)
90
and 8 mL water were mixed in a 50 mL round-bottom flask. After the Arabic gum was dissolved,
91
gelatin (0.2 g), glycerine (0.4 g) and 8 mL water were added. The mixture was mixed and heated at
92
50 °C for 12 h and filtered to remove the undissolved solid. The matrix material (7.5 cm x 7.5 cm)
93
plastic (or glass) was thoroughly rinsed with ethanol and deionized water and subsequently dried using
94
nitrogen gas. The mixture (0.5 mL) was added dropwise to the surface of the plastic while it was hot. A
95
thin uniform film was formed after swing lightly. After cooling at room temperature overnight, the
96
edible elastic film was obtained.
97
2.3 Preparation of edible super-hydrophobic interface
98
Honeycomb wax (1 mg), acetone (8 g) and n-hexane (1 g) were mixed in a 50 ml round-bottom
99
flask. The mixture was heated to reflux and the temperature was maintained for 1 h. After the reaction
100
was completed, the mixture was colorless and transparent. Ethanol (11 g) was added dropwise to the
101
mixture within half an hour. The mixture was then stirred for 1 h to obtain honeycomb wax emulsion
102
upon cooling to room temperature. And then, the honeycomb wax emulsions were sprayed onto the
103
surface of the edible elastic film, which were held at a distance of ~12 cm from the spray coater nozzle.
104
The pressure during spray coating was held constant at 30 psi. After being placed at room temperature
105
for 24 h to remove the solvent, the edible super-hydrophobic interface was obtained.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
106 107
(Scheme 1) 2.4 Toxicity of edible super-hydrophobic interface
108
Mouse osteoblasts were cultured in serum-free medium(K-SFM) containing 10% fetal bovine
109
serum (FBS), at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. The potential cytotoxicity of edible
110
super-hydrophobic interface was evaluated by a MTT assay. Mouse osteoblasts were treated with
111
different quality (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 mg) honeycomb wax, and were incubated for 24 hours. Then,
112
the cells were treated with 0.02 mL of freshly prepared 2.5 mg/mL MTT, and incubated for 4 hours.
113
The supernatant was carefully removed, and dimethylsulfoxide solution was added. The cell viability
114
was calculated based on the absorbance measured at 570 nm.
115
2.5 Characterization
116
FT-IR spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Spectrum 10 FT-IR infrared spectrometer
117
(PerkinElmer, Norwalk, USA) in the wavelength range of 4000 to 1000 cm−1. Scanning electron
118
microscopy (SEM) was conducted on a JSM 7800F electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo ,Japan) with the
119
primary electron energy of 15 kV. The contact angles of the cured samples were measured at 20 °C
120
using a sessile drop method on a dynamic contact angle measurement instrument JC2000C
121
(POWEREACH, Shanghai, China). The mechanical properties were characterized by Instron tension
122
tester (Model 5569, Norwood, USA) at a speed of 5 mm/min and compression test at a speed of 2
123
mm/min. Volatile organic solvents from the edible super-hydrophobic interface were analyzed using an
124
Agilent 7890A gas chromatography/ 5977A mass spectrometer (GC–MS) system (Palo Alto, CA, USA)
125
equipped with an Agilent HP-5-MS capillary column (30m×0.25 mm, 0.25 µm)
126 127
3. Result and Discussion
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 29
Page 7 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
128 129
The wettability of a liquid can be characterized by the contact angle and contact angle hysteresis. For a smooth surface, the contact angle θ is given by Young’s formula as cos θ =
γ − γ γ
130
The contact angle θ of a liquid on a smooth surface is determined by the solid surface energy (γS),
131
liquid surface tension (γL) and solid liquid interfacial tension (γSL). A liquid displays the apparent
132
contact angle θ* and adopts model of the two possible states: Wenzel state or Cassie state as it contacts
133
a surface with multiscale structures. In the Wenzel state, the liquid penetrates multiscale structures and
134
wets surface completely, which is positive for a super-hydrophilic surface.31-32 In the Cassie state, air is
135
trapped between multiscale structures and liquid, which is positive to gain designing
136
super-hydrophobic surfaces due to the reduced solid-liquid contact area by the air pockets.33-35 As a
137
result in Cassie state, liquid shows high apparent advancing contact angles θ*adv, high apparent
138
receding contact angles θ*rec, and low contact angle hysteresis ∆θ*, which are necessary to reduce the
139
adhesion of liquid (when θ* ≥ 150° and ∆θ* ≤ 10°).
140
Figure 1a shows a large-scale SEM image of the surface of bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic
141
interface. Many botryoid structures, uniformly distributed and arranged in a direction opposite to the
142
airflow direction of the spray coating, were found on the surface with diameters ranging from 60 to 90
143
µm. Figure 1b displayed a SEM image of the surface of botryoid structure. Many papillae were found
144
on the surface of the botryoidal in the size of 9 to 18 µm. The inset of Figure 1b shows a
145
high-resolution SEM image of the fold structures in nanometer scale on the surface of a papilla
146
structure. This result illustrated that the surface of the bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface
147
was composed of multiscale structures, including the micron scale, sub-micron scale and nanometer
148
scale. These multiscale structures were the similar as the lotus leaf surface (Figure S1) which possesses
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
149
super-hydrophobic property with large water contact angle θ*.
150
As shown in Figure 2a, a smooth surface with honeycomb wax has relatively low water contact
151
angle θ* (around 85.0°), which is not suitable for application of super-hydrophobic interface. With a
152
sufficient surface coverage of the multiscale structures, the hydrophobicity of honeycomb wax surface
153
was improved significantly (θ* = 158.1°, ∆θ* = 7° for water, Figure 2b), at surface density (ρs) (weight
154
of honeycomb wax of the coating per unit area) ≈ 0.55 mg/cm2. It is noteworthy that liquid contacted
155
the hydrophilic edible elastic layer and resulted in the decrease of water contact angle θ* while the
156
surface coverage was insufficient (ρs ≤ 0.55 mg/cm2) (Figure 2c). At the same time, the increase of ρs
157
did not change the multiscale structures, and the water contact angle θ* did not change significantly (ρs
158
≥ 0.75 mg/cm2). This result illustrated that multiscale structures with appropriate density on coating
159
surface was necessary for super-hydrophobic property of coating interface.
160
Application of the bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface was to reduce the residual
161
liquid food in food containers after being poured out. Liquid food has lower γL than water (γL = 72
162
mN/m), such as Coca-Cola (γL = 59 mN/m), Lipton green tea (γL = 69 mN/m), whole milk (γL = 48
163
mN/m), apple juice (γL = 57 mN/m), wine (γL = 53 mN/m), beer (γL = 52 mN/m), Gatorade (γL = 68
164
mN/m), and coffee [γL = 46 mN m−1]. To validate the bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface
165
can effectively reduce the residual liquid food in food container, the wetting behavior of liquid food
166
was evaluated by different γL liquid food. As shown in Figure3, the liquid foods all have large contact
167
angle (θ* ≥ 150° and ∆θ* ≤ 10°), but the coffee (θ* = 139.6° and ∆θ* = 21°). The coffee is the
168
commercial NESCAFÉ Smoovlatte, which is an aromatic blend of NESCAFÉ and milk, and it contains
169
stabilizer and emulsifier that can change the Cassie state of multiscale structures.
170
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 29
Page 9 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
171 172
To demonstrate the super-hydrophobic property of the interface in practical application, common
173
polystyrene cups were employed as the matrix for the super-hydrophobic interface. The cups were
174
filled with high viscosity liquid food honey (Figure 4). Subsequently, upon tipping the liquid foods out,
175
the cups with the super-hydrophobic interface facilitated removal of liquid food without residue. In
176
contrast, the control cups without coating super-hydrophobic interface exhibited significant residual
177
honey. This is due to the cups with the super-hydrophobic interface has an excellent super-hydrophobic
178
(θ* = 142.6° for honey). In contrast, water contact angle θ* of honey on the surface of control cup was
179
only 64.8°. The result suggested that the super-hydrophobic interface fabricated using edible material
180
could effectively reduce the honey residue. The parameters of super-hydrophobic interface with
181
different liquid foods were listed in Table 1.
182
The bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface with simple multiscale structures of
183
honeycomb wax is not competent for the practical application. The small γS of honeycomb wax results
184
in poor adhesion with substrates and the honeycomb wax is broken off easily from the substrate. The
185
edible elastic film could effectively connect multiscale structures and the substrates to prevent the
186
peeling of multiscale structures. As shown in Figure 5, a significant decrease of water contact angle θ*
187
of the super-hydrophobic interface was found for the coating layer without edible elastic film after
188
long-time flushing. In contrast, with the support of edible elastic film, the water contact angle θ* of the
189
super-hydrophobic interface did not decrease significantly. This result suggested that the edible elastic
190
film was effective to increase the compatibility between honeycomb wax and substrate.
191
In order to explain the strengthening effect of the edible elastic film, the FT-IR spectra of edible
192
elastic film and honeycomb wax were measured (Figure 6a). A broad and intense peak at 3200-3600
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
193
cm−1 was attributed to the –NH2 and –OH stretching. The band at 2920 and 2849 cm−1 was attributed to
194
–CH2 stretching vibrations. Typical absorption peak of amide groups appeared at 1648 cm−1 in edible
195
elastic film. The band at 1737 cm−1 was associated with the stretching of the ester groups in the
196
honeycomb wax. The presence of lots of hydroxyl and amidogen groups in the edible elastic film can
197
form the hydrogen bonding with ester groups of honeycomb wax, and thus increase the adhesion
198
between them.36-40 The binding mechanism of edible elastic film under the bio-inspired
199
super-hydrophobic interface was shown in Figure 6b. The honeycomb wax interacted with the edible
200
elastic film by the hydrogen bond and van der Waals force via functional groups on their surface. The
201
edible elastic film achieved a high compressive stress of more than 0.18 MPa and its normal
202
compressive stress is more than 50% with no-damage after compression (Figure 6c). At the same time,
203
an excellent tensile strength (30 KPa) was indispensable when edible elastic film was used for practical
204
applications (Figure 6d). The high energy storage modulus and tensile strength of edible elastic film
205
was effective to absorb and protect the impact multiscale structures.
206
For a wide range of applications, the bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface was prepared
207
on the flexible substrate of plastic (Figure 7a). The bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface
208
showed a relatively big water contact angle θ* (Figure 7b). Importantly, the water contact angle θ* of
209
super-hydrophobic interface was still more than 140
210
super-hydrophobic interface fabricated was successfully applied to flexible substrate. Temperature, pH
211
and time stability of the super-hydrophobic interfaces were shown in Figure S2, S3 and S4, respectively.
212
The results showed that such film/coating was insensitive to pH value in the solution and were stable
213
for as long as 30 days. However, the contact angle θ of the edible super-hydrophobic interface reduced
214
significantly when heated at 60 or 90 oC for 10 minutes.
o
after repeated folding. This suggests that the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 29
Page 11 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
215
For the food applications, the potential cytotoxicity of the super-hydrophobic interface was
216
evaluated
217
dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide. Figure 8 shows that the relative cell viability is
218
around 100% after the cells being incubated with the material of super-hydrophobic interface at the
219
concentration as high as 15 mg/mL for 72 h. This demonstrated that the material of super-hydrophobic
220
interface was not toxic to mouse osteoblasts. In addition, the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
221
analysis (Figure S5) suggested that the super-hydrophobic interface didn’t contain volatile organic
222
solvent residue, such as acetone and n-hexane used for the preparation of films. This is a very
223
important issue for the use of this coating technique for food.
against
mouse
osteoblasts
via
the
MTT
assay
using
3-[4,5-
224
This study demonstrated a simple and low-cost method to fabricate the bio-inspired edible
225
super-hydrophobic interface. The super-hydrophobic interface exhibited high θ* and low ∆θ* for water
226
with an appropriate coating density on surface. The result shows that most liquid testing food has large
227
contact angle on the super-hydrophobic interface, except those which contain emulsifiers. For the
228
application on flexible substrates, an edible elastic film was fabricated between the honeycomb wax
229
and substrate material, which was proved to be effective to enhance the adhesive force of
230
super-hydrophobic interface. Although the bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface displayed
231
reasonable mechanical durability, the interface was able to maintain good super-hydrophobic property
232
after being repeatedly folded and long-time flushed. The cytotoxicity tests indicated that there was no
233
negative effect on the viability of cells in vitro. This bio-inspired edible super-hydrophobic interface
234
would have applications in reducing the residue of high value-added liquid foods.
235
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
236
Supporting Information
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
237 238
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: XXXXXXX.
239
Water flushing test, tensile stress–strain experiment, SEM image of the lotus leaf surface,
240
temperature, pH and time effects on contact angle θ of super-hydrophobic interface, gas
241
chromatography-mass spectrum of the residual organic solvent analysis for super-hydrophobic
242
interface.
243
AUTHOR INFORMATION
244
Corresponding Author
245
* E-mail:
[email protected] (B.-W. Z.); M. Tan,
[email protected] (M. T.)
246
ORCID
247
Mingqian Tan: 0000000275350035
248
Funding
249
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601389) and the
250
National Key Research and Development Project (2017YFD0400100, 2016YFD0400404).
251
Notes
252
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
253 254 255
References (1)
Wang, W.; Lockwood, K.; Boyd, L. M.; Davidson, M. D.; Movafaghi, S.; Vahabi, H.;
256
Khetani, S. R.; Kota, A. K. Superhydrophobic coatings with edible materials. ACS Appl. Mater.
257
Interfaces 2016, 8, 18664-18668.
258
(2)
Williams, H.; Wikström, F. Environmental impact of packaging and food losses in a life
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 29
Page 13 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
259 260
cycle perspective: a comparative analysis of five food items. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 43-48. (3)
Zhang, W.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, F.; Liu, X.; Jin, J.; Jiang, L. Superhydrophobic and
261
superoleophilic pvdf membranes for effective separation of water-in-oil emulsions with high flux. Adv.
262
Mater. 2013, 25, 2071-2076.
263
(4)
Cheng, Z.; Du, M.; Lai, H.; Zhang, N.; Sun, K. From petal effect to lotus effect: a facile
264
solution immersion process for the fabrication of super-hydrophobic surfaces with controlled adhesion.
265
Nanoscale 2013, 5, 2776-2783.
266
(5)
Seo, J.; Lee, S.; Han, H.; Jung, H. B.; Hong, J.; Song, G.; Cho, S. M.; Park, C.; Lee, W.; Lee,
267
T. Gas-driven ultrafast reversible switching of super-hydrophobic adhesion on palladium-coated silicon
268
nanowires. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4139-4144.
269 270 271 272 273
(6)
Lin, F.; Shuhong, L.; Yingshun, L.; Lei, J. Super-hydrophobic surface: from natural to
artificial. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1857-1860. (7)
Liu, K.; Jiang, L. Bio-inspired design of multiscale structures for function integration. Nano
Today 2011, 6, 155-175. (8)
Feng, L.; Zhang, Z.; Mai, Z.; Ma, Y.; Liu, B.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, D. A super-hydrophobic and
274
super-oleophilic coating mesh film for the separation of oil and water. Angew. Chem. 2004, 116,
275
2046-2048.
276
(9)
Joula, M. H.; Farbod, M. Synthesis of uniform and size-controllable carbon nanospheres by a
277
simple hydrothermal method and fabrication of carbon nanosphere super-hydrophobic surface. Appl.
278
Surf. Sci. 2015, 347, 535-540.
279 280
(10)
Gao, Z.; Zhai, X.; Liu, F.; Zhang, M.; Zang, D.; Wang, C. Fabrication of TiO2/EP
super-hydrophobic thin film on filter paper surface. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 128, 24-31.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
281
(11)
Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Yan, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, P.; Shen, G.; Yu, R. A rapid and efficient
282
strategy for creating super-hydrophobic coatings on various material substrates. J. Mater. Chem. 2008,
283
18, 4442-4449.
284
(12)
Marini, M.; Allione, M.; Torre, B.; Moretti, M.; Limongi, T.; Tirinato, L.; Giugni, A.; Das, G.;
285
di Fabrizio, E. Raman on suspended dna: novel super-hydrophobic approach for structural studies.
286
Microelectron. Eng. 2017, 175, 38-42.
287
(13)
Gentile, F.; Coluccio, M. L.; Zaccaria, R. P.; Francardi, M.; Cojoc, G.; Perozziello, G.;
288
Raimondo, R.; Candeloro, P.; Di Fabrizio, E. Selective on site separation and detection of molecules in
289
diluted solutions with super-hydrophobic clusters of plasmonic nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2014, 6,
290
8208-8225.
291 292 293 294 295
(14)
Sahoo, B. N.; Kandasubramanian, B. Recent progress in fabrication and characterisation of
hierarchical biomimetic superhydrophobic structures. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 22053-22093. (15)
He, M.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Jin, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Song, Y. Super-hydrophobic film retards
frost formation. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 2396-2399. (16)
Shi, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Jin, J.; Jiang, L. Ultrafast separation of
296
emulsified oil/water mixtures by ultrathin free-standing single-walled carbon nanotube network films.
297
Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2422-2427.
298 299 300
(17)
Liao, Y.; Loh, C. H.; Wang, R.; Fane, A. G. Electrospun superhydrophobic membranes with
unique structures for membrane distillation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16035-16048. (18)
Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, D.; Cao, M.; Jiang, L. Floatable, Self-cleaning, and
301
carbon-black-based superhydrophobic gauze for the solar evaporation enhancement at the air-water
302
interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 13645-13652.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 29
Page 15 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
303 304 305 306 307
(19)
Ye, L.; Guan, J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, J.; Ye, C.; You, J.; Li, Y. Fabrication of superhydrophobic
surfaces with controllable electrical conductivity and water adhesion. Langmuir 2017, 33, 1368-1374. (20)
Zhang, E.; Wang, Y.; Lv, T.; Li, L.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, Y. Bio-inspired design of hierarchical
pdms microstructures with tunable adhesive superhydrophobicity. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 6151- 6158. (21)
Li, X.; Yu, X.; Cheng, C.; Deng, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, X. Electrospun superhydrophobic
308
organic/inorganic composite nanofibrous membranes for membrane distillation. ACS Appl. Mater.
309
Interfaces 2015, 7, 21919-21930.
310
(22)
Fabra, M. J.; López-Rubio, A.; Lagaron, J. M. Use of the electrohydrodynamic process to
311
develop active/bioactive bilayer films for food packaging applications. Food Hydrocolloids 2016, 55,
312
11-18.
313
(23)
314 315
Jarzębski, M.; Bellich, B.; Białopiotrowicz, T.; Śliwa, T.; Kościński, J.; Cesàro, A. Particle
tracking analysis in food and hydrocolloids investigations. Food Hydrocolloids 2017, 68, 90-101. (24)
Beltrán, A.; Valente, A. J. M.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M. a. C. Characterization of
316
poly(ε-caprolactone)-based nanocomposites containing hydroxytyrosol for active food packaging. J.
317
Agric. Food. Chem. 2014, 62, 2244-2252.
318
(25)
Liu, K.; Lin, X.; Chen, L.; Huang, L.; Cao, S.; Wang, H. Preparation of microfibrillated
319
cellulose/chitosan–benzalkonium chloride biocomposite for enhancing antibacterium and strength of
320
sodium alginate films. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2013, 61, 6562-6567.
321
(26)
Sundaram, J.; Pant, J.; Goudie, M. J.; Mani, S.; Handa, H. Antimicrobial and
322
physicochemical characterization of biodegradable, nitric oxide-releasing nanocellulose–chitosan
323
packaging membranes. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2016, 64, 5260-5266.
324
(27)
Lin, L.; Liu, M.; Chen, L.; Chen, P.; Ma, J.; Han, D.; Jiang, L. Bio-inspired hierarchical
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
325
macromolecule-nanoclay hydrogels for robust underwater superoleophobicity. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22,
326
4826-4830.
327 328 329
(28)
Azimi, G.; Dhiman, R.; Kwon, H. M.; Paxson, A. T.; Varanasi, K. K. Hydrophobicity of
rare-earth oxide ceramics. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 315-320. (29)
Li, K.; Ju, J.; Xue, Z.; Ma, J.; Feng, L.; Gao, S.; Jiang, L. Structured cone arrays for
330
continuous and effective collection of micron-sized oil droplets from water. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4.
331
2776-2782
332
(30)
C. R, R.; Sundaran, S. P.; A, J.; Athiyanathil, S. Fabrication of superhydrophobic
333
polycaprolactone/beeswax electrospun membranes for high-efficiency oil/water separation. RSC Adv.
334
2017, 7, 2092-2102.
335 336
(31)
2006, 18, 3063-3078.
337
(32)
338
291-292.
339
(33)
340 341 342 343
Feng, X. J.; Jiang, L. Design and creation of superwetting/antiwetting surfaces. Adv. Mater.
Tian, Y.; Jiang, L. Wetting: intrinsically robust hydrophobicity. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12,
Liu, M.; Wang, S.; Wei, Z.; Song, Y.; Jiang, L. Bioinspired design of a superoleophobic and
low adhesive water/solid interface. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 665-669. (34)
Su, B.; Wang, S.; Song, Y.; Jiang, L. A miniature droplet reactor built on
nanoparticle-derived superhydrophobic pedestals. Nano Research 2010, 4, 266-273. (35)
Zhang, S.; Huang, J.; Tang, Y.; Li, S.; Ge, M.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, K.; Lai, Y. Understanding
344
the role of dynamic wettability for condensate microdrop self-propelling based on designed
345
superhydrophobic tio2 nanostructures. Small 2017, 13, 1600687-1600694.
346
(36)
Zhi, H.; Fei, X.; Tian, J.; Jing, M.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J. A novel
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 29
Page 17 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
347 348
transparent luminous hydrogel with self-healing property. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 5738-5744. (37)
Jing, M.; Fu, Y.; Fei, X.; Tian, J.; Zhi, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y. A novel
349
high-strength polymer hydrogel with identifiability prepared via a one-pot method. Polym. Chem. 2017,
350
8, 3553-3559.
351 352 353
(38)
Siripatrawan, U.; Vitchayakitti, W. Improving functional properties of chitosan films as
active food packaging by incorporating with propolis. Food Hydrocolloids 2016, 61, 695-702. (39)
Du, W.; Shao, H.; He, Z.; Tang, C.; Liu, Y.; Shen, T.; Zhu, Y.; Lau, W.-m.; Hui, D.
354
Cross-linking poly(lactic acid) film surface by neutral hyperthermal hydrogen molecule bombardment.
355
J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015, 63, 10604-10610.
356
(40)
Farris, S.; Introzzi, L.; Fuentes-Alventosa, J. M.; Santo, N.; Rocca, R.; Piergiovanni, L.
357
Self-assembled pullulan–silica oxygen barrier hybrid coatings for food packaging applications. J. Agric.
358
Food. Chem. 2012, 60, 782-790.
359 360
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
361
Figure captions:
362
Scheme 1 Fabrication process of edible super-hydrophobic interface.
363
Figure 1 (a) large-scale SEM images of edible super-hydrophobic interface. (b) SEM image of a papilla
364
structure on the surface of botryoid structures (inset shows the HRTEM image of the surface of a
365
papilla structure).
366
Figure 2 Water contact angle θ* of (a) unprocessed honeycomb wax and (b) super-hydrophobic
367
interface with multiscale structures. (c) Water contact angle θ* of super-hydrophobic interface with a
368
different surface density of honeycomb wax.
369
Figure 3 Water contact angle θ* of edible super-hydrophobic interface with the different commercial
370
liquid foods, (a) Coca-Cola, (b) Lipton green tea, (c) whole milk, (d) apple juice, (e) wine, (f) beer, (g)
371
Gatorade, and (h) coffee.
372
Figure 4 Photographs of representative liquid food in an uncoated cup (left) and super-hydrophobic
373
interface coated cup (right) before (a) and after (b) tipping honey out.
374
Figure 5 Water contact angle θ of edible super-hydrophobic interface with/without the edible elastic
375
film during different flushing time.
376
Figure 6 (a) FT-IR spectra of honeycomb wax and edible elastic layer. (b) Enhancement mechanism of
377
honeycomb wax and edible elastic film. (c) Pressure curve of the edible elastic film. Insets show the
378
film before and after being pressured. (d) Tensile stress–strain curve of the edible elastic film.
379
Figure 7 (a) Photograph of edible super-hydrophobic interface on a flexible substrate polypropylene. (b)
380
Water contact angle θ of edible super-hydrophobic interface with a different folding frequency.
381
Figure 8 Cytotoxicity of the honeycomb wax against mouse osteoblasts evaluated with MTT assay.
382
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 29
Page 19 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
383 384
Scheme 1
385
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
386 387
Figure 1
388
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 29
Page 21 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
389 390
Figure 2
391
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
392 393
Figure 3
394
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 29
Page 23 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
395 396
Figure 4
397
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
398 399
Figure 5
400
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 29
Page 25 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
401 402
Figure 6
403
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
404 405
Figure 7
406
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 29
Page 27 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
140
Cell viability (%)
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0
5
10
15
Concentration of honeycomb wax (mg/mL) 407 408
Figure 8
409
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
410 411
Page 28 of 29
Table 1 Parameters of super-hydrophobic interface with various liquid foods.
Items
Energy Coke
Lipton tea
Whole milk
Fruit juice
Wine
Beer
Nestle coffee
Honey
drinks Contact angle θ* on the glass surface 53.4±1.8
63.5±2.1
46.3±1.8
51.0±1.1
54.5±0.9
47.8±1.3
58.1±2.4
43.7±1.1
64.8±2.1
154.2±1.5
158.4±0.8
150.6±1.2
153.9±2.5
152.1±2.3
151.4±1.6
158.1±0.9
139.6±2.4
142.6±1.9
0.878±0.10
1.180±0.24 1.483±0.317
1.066±0.092
1.181±0.103
0.881±0.107
1.327±0.132
8
5
0.007±0.00
0.038±0.01
2
68
(°) Contact angle θ* on the surface of super-hydrophobic interface (°) Residual liquid food (15 g) on the glass 0.981±0.117 surface (g)
2.759±0.1 01
Residual liquid food (15 g) on the surface of super-hydrophobic interface
0.018±0.163
0.162±0.0 0.012±0.006
0.015±0.010
(g)
412
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
0.013±0.006
0.006±0.003
0.111±0.017 39
Page 29 of 29
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
413
Table of Contents Graphic
414
ACS Paragon Plus Environment