Chapter 6
U s e of S o m a t i c E m b r y o g e n e s i s for t h e of
Regeneration
Plants
David A. Stuart and M. Keith Redenbaugh
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
Plant Genetics, Inc., 1930 Fifth Street, Davis, CA 95616
Somatic embryos of many crop species can develop in plant cell cultures as the result of discrete manipulations of growth regulators and nitrogen levels in the culture medium. Somatic embryos express some of the same morphological and biochemical attributes in vitro as do zygotic embryos, their counterpart in vivo. Somatic embryos represent an opportunity to explore the manufacture of embryo specific storage products as well as plant propagules. Techniques for coating naked somatic embryos which will permit survival and subsequent germination are discussed.
In p l a n t s , a s e x u a l embryo development can be t r i g g e r e d from somatic t i s s u e s t o o c c u r under a v a r i e t y of c o n d i t i o n s both in v i v o and i n v i t r o . T h i s p r o c e s s i s r e f e r r e d t o as somatic embryogenesis ( 1 ) . Somatic embryos a r e m o r p h o l o g i c a l l y (2) and b i o c h e m i c a l l y (3,4) s i m i l a r t o t h e i r s e x u a l l y d e r i v e d c o u n t e r p a r t , the z y g o t i c embryo. However, somatic embryos a r i s e by a p r o c e s s of c l o n i n g which does not i n v o l v e m e i o t i c r e c o m b i n a t i o n events a s s o c i a t e d w i t h f e r t i l i z a t i o n and t r u e seed f o r m a t i o n . A somatic embryo can be germinated d i r e c t l y i n t o a p l a n t by a one step p r o c e s s s i m i l a r t o seed g e r m i n a t i o n , s i n c e i t c o n t a i n s both the embryonic shoot and r o o t axes. However, somatic embryos l a c k s t r u c t u r e s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h z y g o t i c embryos such as the seed coat o r endosperm. Thus, a somatic embryo develops as a naked embryo. Somatic embryos can be used f o r a number of purposes such as f o r regeneration of genetically modified c e l l s , f o r production of secondary p r o d u c t s and mass c l o n i n g f o r a r t i f i c i a l seeds. F i g u r e 1 i s a schematic o f the p r o c e s s o f somatic embryogenesis from e x p i a n t to r e g e n e r a t i o n o f a c l o n e d p l a n t . Because somatic embryos can be produced from c a l l u s c u l t u r e s ( u n d i f f e r e n t i a t e d c e l l s ) , c a l l u s can f i r s t be s u b j e c t e d t o g e n e t i c m a n i p u l a t i o n and somatic c e l l s e l e c t i o n b e f o r e embryogenesis and r e c o v e r y o f complete plants. Somatic embryogenesis i s a l s o an e f f i c i e n t method f o r r e c o v e r y o f p l a n t s 0097-6156/87/0334-0087$06.00/0 © 1987 American Chemical Society
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
B I O T E C H N O L O G Y IN A G R I C U L T U R A L C H E M I S T R Y
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
88
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
6.
following lacking
experiments cell
walls)
liposome/cell such
as
corn,
regenerated Control these
of
rice,
this
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
of
somatic permit
a
ability
economical
parents
on
there
would
be
since
Another
example
delivery
of
the
next
traits be
could
now
be
using
oil
control
with
components (8)
are
develop
production
seeds.
found
in
produced
by
this of
(3,4),
production
associated
palm
and
embryos
vitro
process
certain
may
plant
use
and
hybrid
for
work
cloned
of
somatic
such
soybean
or
tested, that
a
the
direct
field
production
one
biology plant
suitable
of
these year.
of
using
If
to
pollination
with
cloned
for
hybrid
outcrossing
delivery
example, seed.
year
the
of
is may
sterility,
systems
is
system
plant
and
field
male
from
embryos no
For
hybrid
for
restorer
for
If
of
embryos embryos
production.
lettuce,
allow
pollinating.
somatic somatic
repeatedly
where
currently
produced,
of
of
production
out
be
conceivable
Use
incompatibility
hybrids
as
application
to
agronomic
somatic
embryo-
such hybrids
would
possible. Problems
Delivery least
of
solved
major
(Figure
frequency. (11), have
Some
or
second allow
non-sterile for
for
problem to
naked
or
of
assess
envisioned
analoguous
covering
and
embryos
somatic
current requires
celery
embryos. that
control;
embryos
at
a
(10),
existing,
of
the
autonomously
field
to
high
alfalfa
high-frequency
However, produce
embryo into
environment.
field
somatic
they
covering
of
at be
most
species
embryos
either
the
stage
that
a vigorous
to
plant
in
While
procedures
development,
tests
have
readiness
these
embryos,
of
a
exist
not
been either
(14,15).
since
that
(9),
have
that
embryogenesis
culture
somatic
systems
embryo
the
reliable
of
carrot
maturation
or
encapsulated
Finally,
The
is
is
requires
somatic
frequencies.
germinate
greenhouse to
lower
situation
with
(13)
production
much
normalization
conducted
as
orange
Seeds
field
problem
embryogenesis
at
it
a
populations such
and
somatic
to
Somatic
associated
first
species
(12),
sporadically A
The
available
poor
will
2).
with
embryos
problems
synchronous
coffee
protocols
Associated
somatic
three
differentiate
3).
and
cloned
to
could
hand
be is
be
need
not
without
Research
it
can
experiments
in
aroma
production.
crossed
does
it
and crops
embryogenesis.
zygotic
for
are
and
reliable
suitable
for
hand
to
breeding
could
no
crops
genesis,
alfalfa
many
to
which
immediate
plant
they
similar
(6,7),
plant
contain
parents,
crop
for
lines
these
In
important
somatic
makes
cells
level.
more
tool
impact
of
plant
macromolecules
and
of
opportunity
flavor,
and
industrial and
an
products
The
exists.
cotton,
pathway
oil,
embryos.
inbred
the
plant cocoa
on an
an
(naked of
agronomically
process
biochemically
(5),
valuable
parent
the
present
essential
cloning
have
are
also
secondary
more
A
Many
soybeans,
using
celery
products as
they
example,
seeds
wheat,
developmental
embryos
numerous
For
protoplasts
electroporation
possible.
Because of
as
procedures.
primarily
species
somatic
employing such
fusion
89
Use of Somatic Embryogenesis
STUART AND REDENBAUGH
will
to
the
embryo
techniques that
this
embryos need
seed is for
to coat
are be of
referred
zygotic to
production
coating
be
naked, coated
a
as and
a
it with
seeds. somatic
is a
The seed
maturation
hydrated
gel
presently protective
of
combined (Figure somatic
matrix,
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
but
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY
Establish Somatic
Increase Mature
Package in
Quality Somatic
Somatic
2.
Critical
research
of and Embryos
Embryos
G e l Capsules
Germinate
Figure
a n d Improve Embryogenesis
Somatic
problems
Seeds
for production
of
somatic
seeds·
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
STUART A N D R E D E N B A U G H
Use of Somatic Embryogenesis
Figure 3. Somatic seeds. i n calcium a l g i n a t e beads. in diameter.
A l f a l f a s o m a t i c embryos e n c a p s u l a t e d E a c h c a p s u l e i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 mm
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
92
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY
there
is
no
reason
compatible
with
desiccating
somatic
useful. have
Attempts
not
that
the
a
dry
embryos
As
high
could
not
techniques
develop,
to use d r i e d
given
coating
embryo.
dry coatings
coatings
frequency
with
be
for
would
somatic
germination
used
if
it
dehydrating be
especially
embryos
of
is and
of
embryos,
carrot however
(16,17). Reliable
Culture
Embryogenesis
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
In
alfalfa,
can
be In
and o t h e r
which
a
as
to
increase
and
amino
acid The
frequency
of
hormone
genesis
by
the
and
(2,4-D)
four and
day
5
bred
for
varieties
Maturation
of
Embryos
Alfalfa
In
addition
amino
to
acids
Amino
Embryos
containing
no amino
highest
proline,
of
frequency
Further lower
levels
alfalfa in
were
the
size
a
more
give
high U S
a
clear
of
embryos
of by
that
a
acid
embryos
(20).
selected
Quality
and
be
more
was
high
used
to
of
Embryos zygotic
embryos
altered.
in protein
a
balance by
By
using
treating
in this t h a n were
manner those
the biochemistry
When
compared
do n o t Perhaps
a 50% i n c r e a s e
treated
Furthermore,
was
(18).
achieved
50 uM)
give
arginine,
frequency
formation.
to
medium
embryos
achieve
are
embryo
easily
alanine,
performance
quality
(4). to
give
(18). formed
culture
Glutamine-treated
which
formation,
and best
dilute by
Somatic
embryos
convert
on
of
embryos
largest
also
the best
protein
difference
the
embryo-
shown
resulting
followed
2,4-D treatment. storage
in
effected
has
somatic
the
will
embryo
similar
the
the
10 uM 2 , 4 - D ( i n s t e a d
improved-quality
embryo-specific 2,4-D-induced,
of
of
should
c o n v e r s i o n was a c h i e v e d after
in
aseptically
with
of
including
(20).
in
with
work
of
induction of
2,4-D for
also
induction
been
improvements
morphologically
produced of
acids quality.
is
the
have
treatments
and
degree
NH^
yield
or hormones.
amino
such yields
the c o n t r o l
alfalfa
frequency
Thus,
of
highest
embryos
i n embryos
the acids
of
of
cultures
embryo
.
result
combinations between
acids
to
the
arginine
placed
conversion
a n d NH,
necessarily
are
acids
embryo
amino
acid which
understood.
Earlier
the frequency the
amino
presence
nitrogen
L-proline
may a f f e c t
Improvements
acid-treated
plantlets. the
and
the
the
50 uM 2 , 4 - d i c h l o r o p h e n o x y a c e t i c
to regenerate
a lanine,
but
certain
during
used.
gives
increase
Other
in
10 a n d 25
The amino
is
not
of
ion
reduced
(13).
t h e most
ammonium
and l i n e s
increasing
other
embryogenesis
to
Embryo:
also
Glutamine, embryos.
the
of
way a s y e t n o t
genotype
exposure
the a b i l i t y
in
Somatic
embryogenesis
between
levels
exposure
uM k i n e t i n
Additionally,
lies
improve
on
Thus,
somatic
of
to
of
ammonium
L-arginine
depends
i n some
optimization three
and
somatic
tested
formation
NH,
(19).
metabolism
been
the effect
L-arginine
range
i n embryogenesis.
optimized
medium
of of
the e f f e c t s have
L-alanine,
the
regeneration
the Frequency
level
optimal
embryo
Interestingly,
L-proline
the
The
acids
somatic
2.5-fold
compared
(13).
amino
L-glutamine,
L-proline.
in
the frequency
adjusting
investigations,
such
stimulates
causes as
species,
by
medium
further
sources
Improvement
Alfalfa
optimized
regeneration mM.
Control:
in
in
deposition
the 10
level and
was
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
of
50 uM
evident.
6.
Low
2,4-D
found less of
treated
in than
20 n g
storage
10%
the
there
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
Gel In
is
each
(Figure
the 4).
represent
level
level
expected
for
Encapsulation for
room
of
system,
11S
to
that
assess
however,
in
the
somatic
level
of
embryo
somatic
embryo
accumulation
seed,
protein
accumulated
is
less
than
suggesting
that
embryo
quality.
Embryos
embryos a
the
normalization
assay
alfalfa
of
embryos
indicates
to
protein
improvement
Somatic
somatic
propagation
for
of
each
result
related
useful
maxiumum
ug
uM-treated
This
a
2.4
50
is
The
additional
order
accumulated
while
accumulation
a n d may
(4).
of
seed,
protein
development quality
embryos
alfalfa
93
Use of Somatic Embryogenesis
STUART AND REDENBAUGH
to
delivery
be
useful
method
as
is
a
low-cost,
required
with
high-volume
the
following
parameters : 1.
The
2.
A provision
use
of
low-cost
3.
The
for
delivery
materials
singulation
system
should
that
are
non-toxic.
of
the
somatic
be
compatible
embryos. with
existing
planting
equipment. A
hydrogel
encapsulation
satisfies fluid
these
drilling
delivery
because
using
quality
of
somatic
artificial
embryos
and
the
singulates or
cup
embryos
is
a
one
is
the
vacuum
seeds.
gel
particularly
Encapsulation
it
existing
the
producing
system,
requirements.
planters.
further
on
and
As
both
technology
than
allows
for
discussed,
the
parameter
for
critical
in
alginate,
advantageous
embryos
Improvement
encapsulation
based
more
the
quality
need
to
of
progress
simultaneously. Somatic
embryos
lettuce 3).
were
The
lack
most
of
useful
damage
alginate, bean
In
uncomplexed reagent. range does
hardness
not
impede from
somatic
embryos.
due
to
when
of
firm
gels
into to
100
mM
(2-3%
components
majority
of
our
cost.
range).
Other
Complexation calcium
encapsulating
or
time
chloride
somatic
of
This but
somatic
non-encapsulated equivalent
in
was
chosen
alginate
forms
0.5
ferrous
alginate.
for
capsules,
to
5.0%.
calcium
complexing or
w/v)
and
the
Sodium
chloride
chloride,
capsule.
alginate
from
push-pull
per
essentially
ranging
calcium
Chatillon
to
the
complexing
Germination
sodium
locust
with
agents
(w/v)
nitrate such
as
chloride
are
is
minutes.
20-30
(100
embryos
mM) in
also
are the
the great
experiments.
alginate
softer
a
cobaltous
complexing
standard
lower
concentrations either
chloride,
alginate
and
are
with
appropriate
equal
and
potassium
mixed
handling
is
alginates
at
were
germination.
these
or
carrageenan
a
and
Figure
encapsulation
pressure
for
Consequently,
availability
sodium
with
breaking
capsules.
(30
produces
embryo
of
are
an
measured
kg
(21,23;
ease
and
into
Brassica,
hydrogels
embryos
potassium
lanthanum
Sodium
as
sufficiently
capsules
capsules
for
gelatin,
dropped 1.2
somatic
solution suitable
to
of
embryos
and
dropped
Sodium
terms
somatic
celery,
of
form
its
suitable
0.2 is
the
Sodium
with
and
alfalfa,
variety
in
the
hardness,
of
a
somatic
alginate
from
embryos
in
the
general,
Capsule
to
species,
hydrogels
hydrogel
range
ability
four
to
sodium
gum.
gauge,
of
encapsulated
(2%
capsules
(w/v)
that
when
still
mixed
retained
with
gelatin
sufficient
(5%
integrity
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
w/v) for
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
94
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY
Somatic Embryos pH7; I M NaCI; I 0 mM DTT ; 200^M PMSF 60
50
Seed IIS Embryos Induced i With o-o
50μΜ
2,4-D
·—·
10/aM
2,4-D
40
\ α» 3
Ο
oc CL
30
1*1
20
10
40
Top
30
20
FRACTION NUMBER
10
1
Bot
co
-
-° CO
CO
?
Ο
CM
CSJ
Ο
Ο
ΙΩ
F i g u r e 4 . A l f a l f a s o m a t i c embryo p r o t e i n s s e p a r a t e d a f t e r e x t r a c t i o n by sucrose d e n s i t y g r a d i e n t s e p a r a t i o n ( l e f t s i d e o f chromatogram) and S D S - p o l y a c r y l a m i d e e l e c t r o p h o r e s i s ( r i g h t s i d e of chromatogram). The 2 , 4 - D - t r e a t e d embryos e x p r e s s more U S p r o t e i n as shown i n t h e s u c r o s e g r a d i e n t . The 11S p r o t e i n h a s p o l y p e p t i d e s t h a t c o - m i g r a t e w i t h U S s e e d p r o t e i n a s shown b y SDS-PAGE. (Reproduced w i t h p e r m i s s i o n from r e f e r e n c e 4 . C o p y r i g h t 1985, Plenum P u b l i s h i n g . )
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
6.
handling. to
The sodium
complexation
temperature
does
encapsulating and
will
n o t emerge
potassium
similar
in firm
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
geenan
is
somatic geenan
as
to
the
do
not
ammonium
i t
bean
(23).
either
carbohydrate
appears
endosperm
for
vigorously
In
in
are
order
for
encapsulating of
embryos)
t o 30 C .
research
has been
carra
conducted
Initial
results
a prominent
endosperm
storage
reserves
are required
f o r ex-albuminous are
the
itself
such
species
not
in with
necessarily
may s e r v e
requirements
to
kappa-carra-
temperature
or celery.
of
capsules
capsules.
the capsule to
These
was r i c h
carbohydrates
that
gum ( 0 . 4 t o 1.0%
with
whereas
tailored
This
5 0 0 mM s o l u t i o n
essential
alfalfa
species
additional
It
a
the gelling
to somatic
f o r germination,
endosperm
that
encapsulation
of
prior
may b e u s e f u l
bean
into
gum i s
lowers
embryo
at 40^C chloride.
germinate
chloride.
carrageenan
f o r albuminous
required
dropped
the alginate-gelatin
Locust
embryos
reduced
artificial
or
a
since
additional
capsule
i s held calcium
capsule.
when
50 C ( d e t r i m e n t a l
that
celery,
the
capsules
required.
of
of
The mixture
that
a harder
capsules,
somatic
indicate
embryos
chloride
embryos
Much using
t h e embryos.
from
hardness
from
mixture
mM s o l u t i o n
( 0 . 2 t o 0 . 8 % w/v) a n d l o c u s t
firm
produce
50
somatic
produce
either
a
damage
Carrageenan w/v)
alginate-gelatin
in
95
Use of Somatic Embryogenesis
STUART AND REDENBAUGH
of
as an
species
of
and conversion
to
concern. Finally, complete, on
in vitro
crops, that
plants
conversion
the conversion for
alfalfa
naked
naked
to
of
somatic
experiments
is
40-50%.
s h o w t h e same
research
celery
seeds
For celery,
this
the
has
and a l f a l f a .
f o r somatic
Although
within
seeds
To date,
with
embryos.
experiment,
embryos
the
is essential.
frequencies
somatic
conversion
experiment and
germination
vigorous
is is
F o r both
identical 60-90%
frequencies
any one e x p e r i m e n t ,
focused
vary
somatic
to
while from seeds
response.
Acknowledgments The and
contributions maturation
studies, studies
of
Steve
studies,
and David are greatly
Slade
Strickland of
Janet
and Peter
and Carol
Nelsen Viss
to
McCall the
to the y i e l d
storage
t o t h e embryo
protein
encapsulation
appreciated.
Literature Cited 1. 2. 3. 4. K.W.; 5. 6. 7. 8.
Tisserat, B.; Esan, E.B.; Murashige, T. Horticultural Reviews. 1979, 1; 1-78. Halperin, W.; Jensen, W.A. J . Ultrastruct. Res. 1967, 18, 428-43. Crouch, M.L. Planta. 1982, 156, 520-4. Stuart, D.A.; Nelsen, J.; Strickland, S.G.; Nichol, J.W. In Tissue Culture in Forestry and Agriculture Henke, R.R.; Hughes, Constantin, M.P.; Hollaender, Α . , Eds. Plenum Publ. Corp., New York, 1985, pg. 59-73. Al-Abta, S.; Galpin, I . J . ; Collin, H.A. Plant Sci. Lett. 1979, 16, 129-134. Jalal, M.A.; Collina, H.A. New Phytol. 1979, 83, 343-349. Janick, J.; Wright, D.C.; Hasegawa, P.M. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1982, 107, 919-22. Turnham, E . ; Northcote, D.H. Phytochem. 1984, 23, 35-9.
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
96 9. 10. 11. 12.
Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on June 9, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: March 18, 1987 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1987-0334.ch006
13. 14. 15.
16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY Kamada, H.; Harada, H. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1979, 91, 453-63. Orton, T . J . In Handbook of Plant Cell Culture Sharp, W.R.; Evans, D.A.; Ammirato, P.V.; Yamada, Y. Eds. MacMillan Publ. N.Y. 1984, Vol. 2,4, Chapter 9. Walker, K.A.; Sato, S.J. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture. 1981, 1, 109-21. Sondahl, M.R.; Sharp, W.R. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1977, 81, 395-408. Ben-Hayyim, G.; Neumann, H. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1983, 110, 331-7. Ammirato, P.V. Bio/technology, March 1983, 68-74. Lutz, J . D . ; Wong, J.R; Rowe, J.; Tricoli, D.M.; Lawrence, R.H., Jr. In Tissue Culture in Forestry and Agriculture Henke, R.R.; Hughes, K.W.; Constantin, M . J . ; Hollaender, H. Eds. Plenum Press, N.Y. 1985, 105-116. Kitto, S.L.; Janick, J . J . Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1985, 110, 277-82. Kitto, S.L.; Janick, J . J . Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1985, 110, 283-6. Stuart, D.A.; Strickland, S.G. Plant Sci. Lett. 1984, 34, 165-74. Stuart, D.A.; Strickland, S.G. Plant Sci. Lett. 34: 175-181. Walker, K.A.; Wendeln, M.L.; Jaworski, E.G. Plant Sci. Lett. 1979, 16, 23-30. Redenbaugh, K.; Nichol, J.; Kossler, M.; Paasch, B. In Vitro 1984, 3 256-7. Redenbaugh, K.; Paasch, B.; Nichol, J.; Kossler, M.; Viss, P.; Walker, K. Bio/technology (in press). Redenbaugh, K.; Slade, D.; Viss, P.; Kossler, M. In Forest and Crop Biotechnology - Progress and Prospects Valentine, F. Ed. Springer Verlag, N.Y. (in press).
RECEIVED September 24, 1986
LeBaron et al.; Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.