Subscriber access provided by TEXAS A&M INTL UNIV
Article
Cellular Transport and Bioactivity of a Major Saffron Apocarotenoid, Picrocrocin (4-(#-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2,6,6trimethyl–1–cyclohexane–1-carboxaldehyde) Anastasia Kyriakoudi, Yvonne C. O'Callaghan, Karen Galvin, Maria Z. Tsimidou, and Nora M. O'Brien J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03363 • Publication Date (Web): 04 Sep 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 5, 2015
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Cellular Transport and Bioactivity of a Major Saffron
2
Apocarotenoid, Picrocrocin (4-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2,6,6-
3
trimethyl–1–cyclohexane–1-carboxaldehyde)
4 5
Running Title: Cellular Transport and Bioactivity of the Saffron Apocarotenoid,
6
Picrocrocin
7 8 9 10
Anastasia Kyriakoudia, Yvonne C. O’Callaghanb, Karen Galvinb, Maria Z. Tsimidoua Nora M. O’Brien*b
11 12
a
13
University of Thessaloniki (AUTh), 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
14
b
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology, School of Chemistry, Aristotle
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
15 16
*To whom correspondence should be sent: Professor Nora M. O’Brien, School of
17
Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. E-mail:
18
[email protected]. Fax: +353 21 4270244. Tel: +353 21 4902884
19 20 21 22 23
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
24
ABSTRACT: The cellular transport and bioactivity of the second major saffron
25
apocarotenoid, picrocrocin, was examined in parallel to that of the major group,
26
crocetin sugar esters, in aqueous extracts. The transport of pure picrocrocin was
27
investigated in comparison to that of other saffron apocarotenoids, trans-crocetin (di-
28
β-D-gentiobiosyl) ester and crocetin using the Caco-2 cell model coupled with an in
29
vitro digestion procedure. RP-HPLC-DAD was employed to quantify the
30
bioaccessible and bioavailable amounts of individual apocarotenoids. Picrocrocin and
31
crocetin sugar esters though highly bioaccessible (75% and 60%, respectively), were
32
transported at minute quantities (0.2% and 0.5%, respectively; 10 fold lower than
33
crocetin). Picrocrocin did not protect against oxidant-induced DNA damage in U937,
34
human monocytic blood cells at the concentration investigated however, it reduced
35
the proliferation of human adenocarcinoma and hepatocarcinoma cells. Our findings
36
may be useful for the requirements of food legislation regarding saffron preparations,
37
in which both apocarotenoid groups co-exist.
38 39
KEYWORDS: picrocrocin, saffron apocarotenoids, crocetin, cellular transport,
40
bioactivity
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 33
Page 3 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
50
INTRODUCTION
51 52
Saffron, the dehydrated red stigmas of the plant Crocus sativus L. that
53
comprise the most expensive spice in the world, is highly appreciated for the
54
appealing bright yellow hues, the characteristic bitter taste and distinctive aroma
55
which it imparts to certain dishes and beverages. Its coloring properties are attributed
56
to a group of water-soluble apocarotenoids rarely found in nature, the sugar esters of
57
crocetin (8,8′-diapocarotene-8,8′-dioic acid), known as crocins. The bitter taste is
58
principally assigned to the colorless monoterpene glucoside picrocrocin (4-(β-D-
59
glucopyranosyloxy)-2,6,6-trimethyl–1–cyclohexane–1-carboxaldehyde).
60
secondary metabolite groups originate from the same precursor, zeaxanthin.1,2
61
Crocetin sugar esters account for up to 30% of dehydrated stigmas weight.
62
Picrocrocin is the second most abundant apocarotenoid of saffron (up to 20%, w/w).3
63
Aroma is the result of the presence of many volatiles among which safranal (2,6,6-
64
trimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxaldehyde),
65
picrocrocin is most abundant.1 The chemical structures of the major saffron
66
apocarotenoids are illustrated in Figure 1.
a
degradation
Both
product
of
67
Apart from its known applications in the food industry, saffron can be
68
considered as a functional spice4 because of the many biological activities assigned to
69
its polar extracts or individual apocarotenoids. So far, attention has been focused on
70
the properties of crocetin sugar esters as well as to the parent molecule, crocetin.
71
Previous data has assigned protective effects against various types of cancer,
72
atherosclerosis, hepatotoxicity and antiradical properties to these apocarotenoids (e.g.
73
5,6
74
present in saffron extracts at high concentrations.
). Less is known about the bioactivity of picrocrocin, which is concomitantly
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
75
Studies on the bioactivity of saffron apocarotenoids are numerous but
76
available data on their absorption and metabolism are rather limited. The first data on
77
the bioaccessibility of crocetin sugar esters and picrocrocin from aqueous saffron
78
extracts, reported by Kyriakoudi et al. (2013)7, indicated that ~50% and ~70% of
79
them, respectively, were bioaccessible upon in vitro gastrointestinal digestion
80
conditions. The authors did not detect free crocetin in the saffron extract digestate, a
81
finding verified a few years later by Lautenscläger et al. (2015).8 In vivo studies,
82
however, point out that crocetin is the form detected in biological fluids9-11 suggesting
83
thus, that this is the most biologically relevant form. In addition, Lautenscläger et al.
84
(2015)8 detected free crocetin in the digestate only when they added a freshly
85
prepared tissue homogenate from purged small mouse intestine to their in vitro model.
86
However, no information is available in the literature for the intestinal absorption and
87
metabolism of picrocrocin.
88
The present study aimed at investigating the cellular transport of the second
89
major saffron apocarotenoid picrocrocin as this glucoside is co-extracted with crocetin
90
sugar esters using water or alcoholic mixtures. A Caco-2 cell model coupled with an
91
in vitro digestion procedure was employed. Caco-2 cells are human colon
92
adenocarcinoma cells, which can be differentiated to resemble small intestinal
93
epithelial cells.12 This cell line is a well-established tool for the in vitro assessment of
94
cellular transport and prediction of the bioavailability of nutrients and non-nutrient
95
bioactive compounds (e.g. carotenoids and phenols). Using the same model, the
96
cellular transport of pure picrocrocin was also investigated in comparison to that of
97
the other two major saffron apocarotenoids, i.e. trans-crocetin (di-β-D-gentiobiosyl)
98
ester (trans-4-GG crocetin ester) and crocetin. Moreover, the potential biological
99
activity of picrocrocin in terms of protection against oxidant-induced DNA damage in 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 33
Page 5 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
100
U937 cells and anti-proliferative effects in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were also
101
investigated using the Comet and MTT assays, respectively. The data of the present
102
study will add to existing knowledge on the degree of cellular transport of polar
103
apocarotenoids and also to the limited information regarding the bioactivity of
104
picrocrocin. Our findings may also be useful to the requirements of food legislation
105
regarding saffron preparations.
106 107
MATERIALS AND METHODS
108
Chemicals. Authentic Greek saffron (harvest year 2013, Category I according
109
to ISO 3632-1 specifications13) was donated by the Saffron Cooperative of Kozani
110
(Greece).
111
All of the chemicals were of the highest purity needed for each assay. In particular,
112
the enzymes (pepsin, pancreatin) and bile salts used were from Sigma Chemical Co.
113
(Dublin, Ireland). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Invitrogen (Paisley,
114
Scotland, UK). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), Hank’s balanced salt
115
solution (HBSS) and RPMI-1640 medium were from Sigma Chemical Co. (Dublin,
116
Ireland). Cell culture plastics were supplied by Cruinn Diagnostics (Dublin, Ireland).
117
Corning 24 mm transwell plates with collagen coated PTFE membrane and 0.4 µm
118
pore size (product code: CLS3491) were supplied by Sigma Chemical Co. (Dublin,
119
Ireland). All solvents used were of HPLC grade. Ultra-high purity water was
120
produced in the laboratory using a SG Ultra Clear Basic UV system (SG
121
Wasseraufbereitung und Regenerierstation GmbH, Barsbüttel, Germany).
122 123
Apocarotenoid Isolation. Individual apocarotenoids were isolated and characterized as follows:
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
124
Picrocrocin isolation. Picrocrocin was isolated according to Sánchez et al.
125
(2009).14 Purity (91%) of the isolated compound was checked chromatographically by
126
RP-HPLC-DAD (HPLC system I) and calculated as the percentage of the total peak
127
area at 250 nm. The HPLC system I consisted of a pump, model P4000 (Thermo
128
Separation Products, San Jose, CA, USA), a Midas autosampler (Spark, Emmen, The
129
Netherlands), and a UV 6000 LP diode array detector (DAD) (Thermo Separation
130
Products, San Jose, CA, USA). Separation was carried out on a LiChroCART
131
Superspher 100 C18 (125×4 mm i.d.; 4 µm) column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
132
The elution system used consisted of a mixture of water:acetic acid (1 %, v/v) (A) and
133
acetonitrile (B). The linear gradient was 20 to 100 % B in 20 min. The flow rate was
134
0.5 mL/min. Chromatographic data were processed using the ChromQuest Version
135
3.0 software (Thermo Separation Products, San Jose, CA, USA). Monitoring was in
136
the range of 200 – 550 nm. Its identity was confirmed by LC-ESI-MS analysis (model
137
2010 EV, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
138
spectroscopy recording the 1H 1D spectra at 300 MHz on a Brucker 300AM
139
spectrometer (Rheinstetten, Germany) (see Supporting Information I).
140
Trans-4-GG crocetin ester isolation. The procedure described below was
141
according to Kyriakoudi et al. (2012).3 In particular, saffron stigmas were carefully
142
ground with an agate pestle and mortar and passed through a 0.4 mm sieve just prior
143
to further analysis. Finely ground saffron (0.36 g) was extracted with ultra-high purity
144
water (20 mL) with the aid of ultrasounds for 30 min. Sample temperature was kept at
145
15 ± 0.5 °C in a thermostated water bath. The extract was centrifuged (4,100 rpm, 15
146
min, 4 oC) and the supernatant was lyophilized and stored at -22 oC until further use.
147
Trans-4-GG crocetin ester was then isolated by semi-preparative RP-HPLC (HPLC
148
system II). The system consisted of two Marathon IV series HPLC pumps (Rigas 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 33
Page 7 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
149
Labs, Thessaloniki, Greece), a Rheodyne injection valve (model 7125) with a 250 µL
150
fixed loop (Rheodyne, Cotati, CA) and a diode array linear UVIS-206 multiple
151
wavelength detector (Linear Instruments, Fermont, CA). Separation was carried out
152
on a Nucleosil 100 C18 (250×10 mm i.d.; 7 µm) chromatographic column (Macherey-
153
Nagel, Düren, Germany). The gradient elution system used consisted of water (A) and
154
methanol (B). The gradient was: 0 min, 30 % (B), 0–10 min, 45 % (B), 10–20 min, 70
155
% (B), 20–30 min, 100 % (B), 30– 40 min, 100 % (B), 40–50 min, 30 % (B) with a
156
flow rate of 3.0 mL/min. Monitoring was at 440 nm. Purity (97%) of isolated trans-4-
157
GG crocetin ester was checked chromatographically by RP-HPLC-DAD (HPLC
158
system I) in the range 200 – 550 nm and calculated as the percentage of the total peak
159
area at 440 nm. The identity of the isolated trans-4-GG crocetin ester was confirmed
160
by LC-ESI-MS analysis and by NMR spectroscopy, recording the 1H 1D spectra at
161
300 MHz on a Brucker 300AM spectrometer (Rheinstetten, Germany) (see
162
Supporting Information II).
163
Crocetin preparation. Crocetin was prepared from an aqueous saffron extract
164
by acid hydrolysis according to a protocol described by Ordoudi et al. (2009).15 Purity
165
(99%) of isolated crocetin was checked chromatographically by RP-HPLC-DAD
166
(HPLC system I) in the range of 200 – 550 nm and calculated as the percentage of the
167
total peak area at 440 nm. Its identity was confirmed by LC-ESI-MS analysis and by
168
NMR spectroscopy recording the
169
spectrometer (California, United States) (see Supporting Information III).
1
H 1D spectra at 500 MHz on a Agilent
170
Preparation and Characterization of Saffron Aqueous Extract. Saffron
171
was carefully ground with a pestle and mortar just prior to analysis. The finely ground
172
plant material (0.05 g) was extracted with ultra-high purity water (100 mL) by
173
rigorous agitation (~ 500 rpm) at ambient temperature for 1 h. All manipulations were 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
174
performed under subdued (yellow) light to minimize photo-decomposition of crocetin
175
esters. The characterization was achieved using RP-HPLC. The HPLC system (HPLC
176
system III) (Finnigan Spectra SYSTEM; Thermo Scientific, Philadelphia, PA)
177
consisted of a P2000 pump, a AS300 autosampler and a diode array detector (DAD;
178
Finnigan Spectra SYSTEM; Thermo Scientific, Philadelphia, PA). Separation was
179
carried out on the same chromatographic column [LiChroCART Superspher 100 C18
180
(125×4 mm i.d.; 4 µm) column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)]. The elution system
181
consisted of a mixture of water:acetic acid (1 %, v/v) (A) and acetonitrile (B). The
182
linear gradient was 20 to 100 % B in 20 min. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min and the
183
injection volume was 20 µL. Chromatographic data were processed using
184
ChromQuest software (version 4.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Monitoring was in the
185
range of 200 – 550 nm. Quantification of picrocrocin was accomplished with the aid
186
of a proper calibration curve (y = 12830x – 2950; R2 = 1.00; 9.8 – 570 ng/20 µL
187
injected volume; n = 6). The total and major individual crocetin esters content of
188
saffron was also determined by constructing a calibration curve of pure trans-4-GG
189
crocetin ester within the range (y = 35561x – 381548; R2 = 0.99; 12 – 600 ng/20 µL
190
injected volume; n = 6).
191
In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion Procedure. The in vitro digestion
192
procedure was carried out as previously described by Kyriakoudi et al. (2013).7
193
Briefly, aliquots (2 mL) of the saffron aqueous extract were transferred into amber
194
bottles and HBSS was added to a final volume of 20 mL. To each bottle, 1 mL of
195
freshly prepared pepsin (0.04 g pepsin/0.1 mol/L HCl) was added and the pH was
196
acidified to 2.0 using 1 mol/L HCl. The samples were overlaid with nitrogen gas and
197
incubated at 37 oC for 1 h in a shaking water bath (Grant, OLS200; Keison Products,
198
Chelmsford, Essex, UK) at 95 rpm to mimic the gastric phase of human digestion. 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 33
Page 9 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
199
The intestinal phase involved increasing the pH to 5.3 with 0.9 mol/L sodium
200
bicarbonate followed by the addition of 200 µL of bile salts glycodeoxycholate (0.8
201
mmol/L), taurodeoxycholate (0.45 mmol/L) and taurocholate (0.75 mmol/L) and 100
202
µL of porcine pancreatin (0.08 g/mL HBSS). The final pH was adjusted to 7.4 using 1
203
mol/L NaOH. Samples were overlaid with a layer of nitrogen gas and incubated at 37
204
o
205
phase, the digestate was centrifuged at 14,000 g using a Sigma 4K15 centrifuge
206
(SIGMA Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany) for 60 min at 4 oC.
207
After centrifugation, the supernatants were collected and filtered through a 0.45 µm
208
membrane filter. The resulting filtrates were stored at -80 oC until further analysis.
C for 2.5 h to mimic the duodenal phase of human digestion. After the intestinal
209
Cellular Transport of Picrocrocin. Human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2
210
cells were purchased from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures
211
(Salisbury, Wilts, UK). Cells were maintained in the DMEM supplemented with 10%
212
(v/v) fetal bovine serum and 1% (v/v) nonessential amino acids. Cells were grown at
213
37 oC in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 in the absence of antiobiotics. Culture
214
medium was replaced three times a week. Caco-2 cells were seeded at a density of 1.0
215
x 105 cells/mL on transwell inserts in 6-well transwell plates. Cells were maintained
216
in DMEM (10% FBS) for 21 to 25 days to obtain a differentiated cell monolayer;
217
media was changed every 2-3 days. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER)
218
measurements were taken before each transport experiment by a transepithelial
219
electrical resistance voltohmmeter (Millicel-ERS, Merck Millipore, Merck KgaA,
220
Darmstadt, Germany) to ensure that the monolayer was intact. Only inserts with
221
TEER values > 250 Ω ⋅ cm2 in culture medium were selected for transport
222
experiments. At the beginning of each experiment, the inserts were washed twice with
223
2 mL HBSS. 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
224
Saffron Extract Digestate. The apical (mucosal) compartment received
225
increasing volumes of the saffron extract digestate diluted with HBSS up to a final
226
volume of 2 mL. The basolateral (serosal) compartment received 1.5 mL of HBSS.
227
Pure compounds. The cellular transport of pure picrocrocin was determined
228
after its dissolution in HBSS at a concentration range between 8 and 24 µM. Pure
229
trans-4-GG crocetin ester and crocetin were also examined at equimolar
230
concentrations for comparison.
231
The incubation time of the cells with the tested samples was 3 hours for all
232
experiments. Following incubation, the TEER values were determined again and
233
wells with TEER values < 250 Ω ⋅ cm2 were discounted. Media from both the apical
234
and basolateral chambers was isolated and stored at -80 oC until further analysis.
235
Samples were analyzed by RP-HPLC (HPLC system III) as detailed above. The
236
injection volume was 90 µL. Quantification of picrocrocin, trans-4-GG crocetin ester
237
and crocetin was accomplished with the aid of proper calibration curves. Cellular
238
transport was the quantity measured in the basolateral chamber expressed as a
239
percentage of the concentration of the compound that was initially added to the Caco-
240
2 cells.
241
In Vitro Bioactivity Studies of Picrocrocin and Other Major Saffron
242
Apocarotenoids. Cell cultures. Caco-2 cells were maintained in the DMEM and
243
supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% (v/v) nonessential
244
amino acids. HepG2 cells were maintained in DMEM and supplemented with 10%
245
(v/v) FBS. U937 cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 and supplemented with 10%
246
(v/v) FBS. The cells were grown at 37 oC and 5% (v/v) CO2 in a humidified incubator.
247
Cells were cultured in the absence of antibiotics and were sub-cultured every two to
248
three days. 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 33
Page 11 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
249
Sample Preparation for Bioactivity Assays. A 5000 µM stock solution of
250
picrocrocin and trans-4-GG crocetin ester in water as well as crocetin in DMSO:PBS
251
(10:90, v/v) were prepared. Samples were filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter.
252
The resulting filtrates were stored at -20 oC until further analysis.
253
Determination of DNA damage (Comet Assay). U937 cells (1 × 105 cells/mL)
254
were supplemented with increasing non toxic concentrations of individual
255
apocarotenoids, i.e. picrocrocin, trans-4-GG crocetin ester, crocetin (25 µM) in 6-well
256
plates with a final volume of 2 mL and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The cytotoxicity
257
of the tested compounds against this cell line was determined by the fluorescein
258
diacetate/ethidium bromide (FDA/EtBr) assay as previously detailed.7 Following
259
incubation, cells were treated with 75 µM H2O2 for 30 min. Cells were harvested,
260
suspended in a low melting point (LMP) agarose, placed on microscope slides, and
261
allowed to solidify. Slides were placed in cold lysis solution [2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM
262
EDTA, 10 mM Tris, pH = 10, 1% (w/v) sodium sarcosinate], with 1% (v/v) Triton X-
263
100 and 10% (v/v) DMSO, added freshly before each use, for 1.5 h. Slides were then
264
placed in a horizontal gel electrophoresis tank containing fresh electrophoresis
265
solution (1 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaOH) for 30 min. Subsequently, electrophoresis
266
was carried out for 25 min at 4 °C with a current of 25 V (300 mA) using a compact
267
power supply. After electrophoresis, the slides were washed three times with
268
neutralizing buffer (0.4 M Tris, pH = 7.5) at 4 °C for 5 min each. Slides were stained
269
with ethidium bromide (20 µg/mL) and covered with coverslips. Komet 5.5 image
270
analysis software (Kinetic Imaging Ltd., Bromborough, UK) was utilized to measure
271
the level of DNA damage, which was expressed as percentage tail DNA.
272
Cell proliferation. The anti-proliferative effects of individual apocarotenoids
273
(picrocrocin, trans-4-GG crocetin ester, crocetin) were examined in the Caco-2 and 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
274
HepG2 cell lines using the (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
275
bromide (MTT) assay (MTT I proliferation kit, Roche Diagnostics, West Sussex,
276
United Kingdom). Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105
277
cells/mL in 96-well plates and allowed to adhere overnight. Cells were then exposed
278
to increasing concentrations of individual apocarotenoids. After 24 h incubation at 37
279
°C, 5 µL of MTT solution was added to each of the samples and incubated for 4 h at
280
37 °C. Following incubation, 100 µL of the solubilisation solution (10% SDS in 0.01
281
M HCl) was added. A further incubation period of 24 h at 37 °C followed.
282
Absorbance was read using a Tecan Spectrafluor Plus microplate reader at a
283
wavelength of 570 nm with a reference wavelength of 690 nm. Cell proliferation was
284
expressed as a percentage of the control, untreated cells. GraphPad Prism version 4.00
285
software (San Diego, USA) was used to determine IC50 values for each of the samples
286
in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells.
287
Statistical analysis. Statistical comparisons of the mean values were
288
performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by the multiple comparison Duncan test (p
289
< 0.05 confidence level) using the SPSS 14.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,
290
USA).
291 292
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
293
Chemical Characterization of Saffron Aqueous Extract. The RP-HPLC-
294
DAD profile of the saffron aqueous extract at 250 nm and 440 nm indicated the
295
presence of picrocrocin and crocetin sugar esters, respectively, as expected. The
296
picrocrocin content (14.4 ± 0.7 g/100 g dry stigmas) and that of total crocetin sugar
297
esters (29.3 ± 0.5 g/100 g dry stigmas) and major individual ones, i.e. trans-4-GG
298
crocetin ester (15.6 ± 0.3 g/100 g dry stigmas) and trans-crocetin (β-D-glucosyl)-(β12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 33
Page 13 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
299
D-gentiobiosyl) ester (trans-3-Gg crocetin ester) (7.4 ± 0.2 g/100 g dry stigmas) were
300
representative of those of high quality saffron and of similar size to reported
301
data.3,14,16
302
Bioaccessibility of Picrocrocin in Saffron Aqueous Extract. Treatment of
303
the saffron aqueous extract under the simulated digestion conditions showed that
304
~75% of the initial amount of picrocrocin survived the harsh gastrointestinal
305
conditions, in agreement with the results of our previous study.7 Picrocrocin was
306
found to be more stable under these conditions than the total crocetin sugar esters of
307
the saffron extract (~40% loss) in agreement with previous results.7,8 Picrocrocin is
308
reported to be resistant to thermal treatment,17 however there is no information
309
available about the effect of pH and/or digestive enzymes to its degradation rate.
310
Cellular
Transport
of
Picrocrocin
and
Other
Major
Saffron
311
Apocarotenoids. Saffron Extract Digestate. The cellular transport of picrocrocin was
312
then examined by applying the saffron digestate to the Caco-2 cell monolayer. As the
313
digestate itself can be toxic to the Caco-2 cells due to the presence of proteolytic and
314
lipolytic enzymes, it was first diluted with medium (HBSS), at least 1:2 (v/v), and
315
then added to the cell monolayer. Blank digestates that contained all the digestive
316
enzymes except for the saffron extract were also examined. Dilutions that resulted in
317
TEER values < 250 Ω ⋅ cm2 were not examined further. After a 3 h incubation period
318
in the Caco-2 cells with three increasing concentrations of the saffron digestate
319
corresponding to 2.3, 2.6 and 2.8 mg picrocrocin/L digestate; no picrocrocin was
320
detected in the basolateral compartment even though a high fraction of its initial
321
amount was bioaccessible. This observation could be attributed to the presence of the
322
sugar moiety that results in lack of affinity towards the cellular membranes and does
323
not allow passive diffusion.18 Numerous studies have demonstrated that hydrolysis by 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
324
digestive enzymes or intestinal microflora may be necessary for the absorption of
325
glucosides of phenolic compounds due to their structural complexicity. Two
326
metabolic pathways have been reported for the absorption of glucosides.19 Glucosides
327
may be hydrolyzed by lactase phloridizin hydrolase (LPH) which is located on the
328
brush border of small intestinal epithelial cells into the aglycone or alternatively, they
329
may be absorbed by means of the active sodium-dependent glucose transporter
330
(SGLT-1) and then they can be hydrolyzed within the intestinal cells by cytosolic β-
331
glucosidase. In the present study, however, no sign of picrocrocin hydrolysis and
332
release of the aglycone 4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde
333
(HTCC)1 was evidenced on the chromatogram at 250 nm [Relative Retention Time
334
(RRT) towards picrocrocin = 1.53]. It has also been observed in the literature that
335
other glucosides such as quercetin-4′-glucoside,20 trans-piceid,21 genistin and
336
daidzein22 are not transported across the Caco-2 cell monolayer possibly due to an
337
absence of β-glucosidase activity in this in vitro model. The crocetin sugar esters of
338
the saffron extract digestate were found to be barely transported across the Caco-2
339
cell monolayer (data not shown). In particular, only 0.4% of the bioaccessible fraction
340
of total crocetin sugar esters was found to be transported to the basolateral
341
compartment, i.e. was bioavailable. Similarly, the major crocetin ester, trans-4-GG,
342
which accounts for ~60% of the total crocetin esters content of saffron was
343
transported by ~0.4% - 0.5%. Trans-3-Gg crocetin ester was detected in the
344
basolateral chamber but at concentrations below the limit of quantification (LOQ) of
345
the specific analytical method employed. No evidence of the hydrolysis of crocetin
346
sugar esters to release the aglycone crocetin was evidenced during cellular transport,
347
experiments, probably due to the reasons detailed above. Lautenschläger et al. (2015)8
348
also found that only 0.34% of pure trans-4-GG crocetin ester was transported across 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 33
Page 15 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
349
the Caco-2 cells monolayer with no concomitant generation of free crocetin during
350
absorption. However, the presence of free crocetin has been observed in rodent
351
plasma after the oral administration of either a mixture of crocetin esters or pure
352
trans-4-GG crocetin ester, derived from the dried fruits of Gardenia jasminoides
353
Ellis.9,10 Moreover, when human volunteers consumed a cup of saffron tea, no
354
crocetin esters but only crocetin was detected in their blood stream.11 Compounds that
355
are not absorbed in the small intestine are expected to reach the colon, where they
356
may exert their biological effects.
357
Pure compounds. The cellular transport of pure picrocrocin versus that of the
358
other two major saffron apocarotenoids, i.e. trans-4-GG crocetin ester and crocetin
359
was then examined at equimolar concentrations (8 – 24 µM) using the same in vitro
360
model. The pure compounds were applied directly onto the Caco-2 cell monolayer. In
361
this case the cellular transport of picrocrocin was found to be ~0.2% (Figure 2). The
362
observed cellular transport in comparison to that found for picrocrocin in the saffron
363
extract digestate could be attributed to antagonistic interactions with other co-present
364
constituents (e.g. crocetin sugar esters) that may have similar mechanisms of
365
absorption.23 Data in Figure 2 showed a 10-fold higher cellular transport of the
366
aglycone crocetin (~5% in the range 8 – 24 µΜ) compared to that of picrocrocin and
367
also its natural sugar ester forms. Lautenschläger et al. (2015)8 measured the
368
absorption of trans-crocetin in Caco-2 cells and found an average permeation rate of
369
32%; they also found that the absorption was similar for each concentration in the
370
range of 10 - 114 µM and was not dose dependent. In addition, there was no specific
371
transporter associated with the transport of trans-crocetin and the authors concluded
372
that transport was via the paracellular route. Several experimental factors such as the
373
pH of the transport buffer, the solvent used to deliver the test compound24 and the 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
374
TEER values of the Caco-2 monolayers can affect transport across Caco-2 cells.25
375
Theoretically, crocetin is expected to be efficiently absorbed after oral administration
376
as it meets the Lipinski’s requirements for optimal oral bioavailability.26 According to
377
Lipinski’s rule27 a compound is expected to display optimum gastrointestinal
378
absorption if «it has a molecular mass of equal or less than 500 g/mol, less than five
379
hydrogen bond donors and less than ten hydrogen bond acceptors and a calculated
380
partition coefficient (logP) less than five”. Therefore, crocetin, with a molecular mass
381
of 328.40 g/mol, four hydrogen bond acceptors, two hydrogen bond donors and a
382
value of logP equal to 4.7228 may fulfill better these requirements in comparison to
383
the more polar apocarotenoids.
384
Once carotenoids are absorbed by the intestinal cells, metabolism becomes the
385
major barrier to their bioavailability.29 The metabolism of apocarotenoids derived
386
from saffron has not been fully eludidated however, β-carotene 9', 10'-oxygenase
387
(BOC2), which is expressed in mammalian tissues, has a broad substrate specificity
388
and has been shown to metabolise xanthophylls.30 In the present study, however,
389
peaks at retention times earlier than those of picrocrocin and trans-4-GG crocetin
390
ester were not detected on the chromatograms of the basolateral medium. Similar
391
observations have been also made in the case of quercetin from red onions31 and
392
apples32 using the same cell line. It is well documented that conjugation via
393
glucuronidation occurs to a greater extent in the liver where the expression of
394
glucuronosyltranferases (UGTs) is much higher compared to that in the small
395
intestine.33
396
DNA Protective Effects of Picrocrocin and Other Major Saffron
397
Apocarotenoids. To determine the protective effects of the individual major saffron
398
apocarotenoids against oxidant-induced DNA damage, the Comet assay was 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 33
Page 17 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
399
employed. The Comet assay is a sensitive tool for measuring DNA single-strand
400
breaks in individual cells.34 In the present study, the addition of 75 µM Η2Ο2 to U937
401
cells caused an increase in DNA damage to 52.6% tail DNA compared to the
402
unchallenged control (4% tail DNA) (Figure 3). Cell supplementation with a non-
403
toxic concentration (data not shown) of pure picrocrocin and trans-4-GG crocetin
404
ester (25 µM) did not exhibit a significant (p < 0.05) DNA protective effect under
405
these experimental conditions. When the aglycone crocetin was examined at an
406
equimolar concentration (25 µM), it caused a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in DNA
407
damage (~43% tail DNA). It has been shown that saffron compounds including
408
crocetin may form a complex with DNA and scavenge free radicals which can protect
409
DNA from oxidant induced damage.35 Literature data focus on the protective effects
410
of saffron extracts and pure trans-4-GG crocetin ester against oxidant-induced DNA
411
damage. In particular, Kyriakoudi et al. (2013)7 reported a significant decrease
412
(13.2% tail DNA) in DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide after
413
supplementation of U937 cells with a saffron aqueous extract. Trans-4-GG crocetin
414
ester has previously demonstrated a dose dependent decrease in H2O2-induced DNA
415
damage, as determined by the Comet assay, in a mouse lymphoma (L5178Y) cell line
416
however, it did not protect against methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-induced DNA
417
damage in the same study.36 The protective effect of a saffron extract and pure trans-
418
4-GG crocetin ester has been also reported in vivo against methyl methanesulfonate–
419
induced DNA damage in mice organs using the Comet assay.37
420
Anti-proliferative effects of Picrocrocin and Other Major Saffron
421
Apocarotenoids in human cancer cell lines. Several constituents of saffron have
422
shown anti-tumor effects through an inhibition of cancer cell growth. The anti-
423
proliferative effects of saffron extracts have been demonstrated in breast cancer cells 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
424
(MCF-7), hepatacarcinoma cells (HepG2), colorectal cancer cells (HCT-116, SW-
425
480, HT-29) and lung cancer cells (NSCLC), amongst others.38 Additionally,
426
ethanolic extracts of saffron have demonstrated selective toxicity to cancer cells and
427
did not induce toxicity in normal, non-cancerous cells.39 The effect of picrocrocin,
428
trans-4-GG crocetin ester and crocetin on the in vitro proliferation of human tumoral
429
cells was studied using the human adenocarcinoma, Caco-2, and the human
430
hepatocellular carcinoma, HepG2, cell lines. As illustrated in Figure 4A, picrocrocin
431
and trans-4-GG crocetin ester reduced Caco-2 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent
432
manner. Crocetin was found to stimulate cell growth at the lower concentrations (125
433
and 250 µM) but reduced cell proliferation at higher ones. The IC50 value for each
434
compound is presented in Table 1. These values were found to range from 840 to
435
1,700 µM with crocetin exhibiting the highest anti-proliferative effect followed by
436
picrocrocin and trans-4-GG crocetin ester. Picrocrocin had an IC50 value of 3,000 µM
437
in TC-1, malignant murine, cells following a 48 hour incubation and trans-4-GG
438
crocetin ester had an IC50 value of 1.5 µM.40 The differences in IC50 values for the
439
various saffron constituents could result from differences in the uptake, transport and
440
retention of these compounds. In the HepG2 cell line, it was found that picrocrocin
441
triggered a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation (Figure 4B) similar to the
442
trend observed in the Caco-2 cell line. In this cell line, trans-4-GG crocetin ester and
443
crocetin were found to increase cell viability at the lower concentrations examined,
444
125 µM and 250 µM, but decreased cell proliferation at higher concentrations. The
445
IC50 values for the tested apocarotenoids were found to be similar in both the HepG2
446
and the Caco-2 cell line (Table 1). These data indicate that picrocrocin, trans-4-GG
447
crocetin ester and crocetin may have chemopreventative effects. The ability of
448
crocetin to impede cancer cell growth has been related to an enhancement of the 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 33
Page 19 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
449
cellular antioxidant systems, the inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis and the induction
450
of apoptosis.41
451
In conclusion, even though picrocrocin is the most bioaccesible among the
452
major saffron apocarotenoids, it was found to be transported across the Caco-2 cell
453
monolayer at very low levels. When pure picrocrocin was examined at equimolar
454
concentrations with other major saffron apocarotenoids, i.e. trans-4-GG crocetin ester
455
and crocetin using the same in vitro model, its cellular transport was found to be
456
approximately similar to that of trans-4-GG crocetin ester and ~10 fold lower than
457
that of the aglycone crocetin. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that
458
the data on the cellular transport of picrocrocin itself or in the presence of other
459
saffron apocarotenoids are presented. Picrocrocin also demonstrated anti-proliferative
460
activity in human cancer cell lines. This study highlights the relevance of picrocrocin
461
to investigations of the bioavailability and bioactivity of saffron extracts.
462 463
ABBREVIATIONS USED
464
trans-4-GG crocetin ester: trans-crocetin (di-β-D-gentiobiosyl) ester; trans-3-Gg
465
crocetin ester, trans-crocetin (β-D-glucosyl)-(β-D-gentiobiosyl) ester; TEER,
466
transepithelial electrical resistance; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HBSS, Hank’s balanced
467
salt solution; DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, MTT, 4,5-
468
dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
469
diacetate/ethidium bromide; LOQ, limit of quantification; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide;
470
RP-HPLC-DAD, reversed phase-high performance liquid chromatography-diode
471
array detector; RRT, relative retention time; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance;
472
ANOVA, analysis of variance.
bromide;
473 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
FDA-EtBr,
fluorescein
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
474
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
475
A.K. thanks the Foundation of State Scholarships (IKY, Athens, Greece) for financial
476
support for doctoral studies.
477 478
SUPPORTING INFORMATION DESCRIPTION
479
LC-ESI-MS and NMR data for the identification of picrocrocin (I), trans-4-GG
480
crocetin ester (II) and crocetin (III).
481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 33
Page 21 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
499
REFERENCES
500
(1) Carmona, M.; Zalacain, A.; Alonso, G. L. The chemical composition of saffron:
501
color, taste and aroma. 1st ed., Editorial Bomarzo S.L. Albacete, Spain, 2006;
502
Chapt. 4, pp 77-104.
503
(2) Frusciante, S., Diretto, G., Bruno, M., Ferrante, P., Pietrella, M., Prado-Cabrero,
504
A., Rubio-Moraga, A., Beyer, P., Gomez-Gomez, L., Salim Al-Babili, Giovanni
505
Giuliano. Novel carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase catalyzes the first dedicated step
506
in saffron crocin biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014, 111, 12246-
507
12251.
508
(3) Kyriakoudi, A.; Chrysanthou, A.; Mantzouridou, F.; Tsimidou, M. Z. Revisiting
509
extraction of bioactive apocarotenoids from Crocus sativus L. dry stigmas
510
(saffron). Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 755, 77-85.
511 512 513 514 515 516
(4) Kyriakoudi, A.; Ordoudi, S. A.; Roldán-Medina, M.; Tsimidou, M. Z. Saffron, a functional spice. Austin J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2015, 3, 1059-1063. (5) Giaccio, M. Crocetin from Saffron: An Active Component of an Ancient Spice, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 155-172. (6) Alavizadeh, S. H.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Bioactivity assessment and toxicity of crocin: A comprehensive review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 64, 65-80.
517
(7) Kyriakoudi, A.; Tsimidou, M. Z.; O’Callaghan, Y. C.; Galvin, K.; O’Brien, N. M.
518
Changes in total and individual crocetin esters upon in vitro gastrointestinal
519
digestion of saffron aqueous extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5318-5327.
520
(8) Lautenschläger, M.; Sendker, J.; Hüwel, S.; Galla, H. J.; Brandt, S.; Düfer, M.;
521
Riehemann, K.; Hensel, A. Intestinal formation of trans- crocetin from saffron
522
extract (Crocus sativus L.) and in vitro permeation through intestinal and blood
523
brain barrier. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 36-44. 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
524
(9) Asai, A.; Nakano, T.; Takahashi, M.; Nagao, A. Orally administrated crocetin and
525
crocins are absorbed into blood plasma as crocetin and its glucuronide conjugates
526
in mice. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2005, 53, 7302-7306.
527
(10)
Xi, L.; Qian, Z.; Du, P.; Fu, J. Pharmacokinetic properties of crocin (crocetin
528
digentiobiose ester) following oral administration in rats. Phytomedicine 2007, 14,
529
633-636.
530
(11)
Chryssanthi, D. G.; Lamari, F. N.; Georgakopoulos, C. D.; Cordopatis, P. A
531
new validated SPE-HPLC method for monitoring crocetin in human plasma -
532
Application after saffron tea consumption. J. Pharm.Biomed. Anal. 2011, 55, 563-
533
568.
534
(12)
Sambruy, Y.; Ferruzza, S.; Ranaldi, G. I. De Angelis. Intestinal cell culture
535
models. Applications in toxicology and pharmacology. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2001,
536
17, 301-317.
537 538 539
(13)
ISO 3632-1, Saffron (Crocus sativus Linneaus) Part 1: Specifications.
International Organization for Standardization, 2011, Geneva. (14)
Sánchez, A. M.; Carmona, M.; Priscila del Campo, C.; Alonso, G. L. Solid-
540
phase extraction for picrocrocin determination in the quality control of saffron
541
spice (Crocus sativus L.). Food Chem. 2009, 116, 792-798.
542
(15)
Ordoudi, S. A.; Befani, C. D.; Nenadis, N.; Koliakos, G. G.; Tsimidou, M. Z.
543
Further examination of antiradical properties of Crocus sativus stigmas extract
544
rich in crocins. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57, 3080-3086.
545
(16)
Sánchez, A. M.; Carmona, M.; Ordoudi, S. A.; Tsimidou, M. Z.; Alonso, G. L.
546
Kinetics of individual crocetin ester degradation in aqueous extracts of saffron
547
(Crocus sativus L.) upon thermal treatment in the dark. J. Agric. Food Chem.
548
2008, 56, 1627-1637. 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 33
Page 23 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
549
(17)
Sánchez, A. M.; Carmona, M.; Jarén-Galán, M.; Mosquera, M. I.; Alonso, G.
550
L. Picrocrocin kinetics in aqueous saffron spice extracts (Crocus sativus L.) upon
551
thermal treatment. J Agric Food Chem. 2011, 59, 249-255.
552
(18)
Murota, K.; Shimizu, S.; Chujo, H.; Moon, J. H.; Terao, J. Efficiency of
553
absorption and metabolic conversion of quercetin and its glucosides in human
554
intestinal cell line Caco-2. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 384, 391-397.
555
(19)
Nemeth, K.; Plumb, G. W.; Berrin, J. G.; Juge, N.; Jacob, R.; Naim, H. Y.;
556
Williamson, G.; Swallow, D. M.; Kroon, P. A. Deglycosylation by small intestinal
557
epithelial cell β-glucosidases is a critical step in the absorption and metabolism of
558
dietary flavonoid glycosides in humans. Eur J Nutr 2003, 42, 29-42.
559
(20)
Walgren R. A.; U. Walle, K.; Walle, T. Transport of quercetin and its
560
glucosides across human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol.
561
1998, 55, 1721-1727.
562
(21)
Henry, C.; Vitrac, X.; Decendit, A.; Ennamany, R.; Krisa, S.; Mérillon, J. M.
563
Cellular uptake and efflux of trans-piceid and its aglycone trans-resveratrol on the
564
apical membrane of human intestinal Caco-2 cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005,
565
53, 798-803.
566
(22)
Steensma, A.; Noteborn, P. J. M.; van der Jagt, R. C. M.; Polman, T. H.G.;
567
Mengelers, M. J. B.; Kuiper, H. A. Bioavailability of genistein, daidzein, and
568
their glycosides in intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharm.
569
1999, 7, 209-212.
570
(23)
D’Archivio, M.; Filesi, C.; Varì, R.; Scazzocchio, B.; Masella, R.
571
Bioavailability of the polyphenols: status and controversies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010,
572
11, 1321-1342.
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
573
(24)
Yamashita, S.; Furubayashi, T.; Kataoka, M.; Sakane, T.; Sezaki, H.; Tokuda,
574
H. Optimized conditions for prediction of intestinal drug permeability using Caco-
575
2 cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 10, 195-204.
576 577 578 579 580
(25)
Wallace, C. J.; Medina, S. H.; ElSayed, M. E. H. Effect of rhamnolipids on
permeability across Caco-2 cell monolayers. Pharm. Res. 2014, 31, 887-894. (26)
Abourashed, E. A. Bioavailability of plant-derived antioxidants. Antioxidants.
2013, 2, 309-325. (27)
Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and
581
computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug
582
discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46, 3-26.
583 584 585 586 587
(28)
ChemSpider: Search and share chemistry. (http://www.Chemspider.com) (last
access on 01/07/2015). (29)
von Lintig, J. Provitamin A metabolism and functions in mammalian biology.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96(suppl), 1234S-1244S. (30)
Bonet, M. L.; Canas, J. A.; Ribot, J.; Palou, A. Carotenoids and their
588
conversion products in the control of adipocyte function, adiposity and obesity.
589
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 572, 112-125.
590
(31)
Walgren, R.A.; Karnaky, K. J.; Lindenmayer, G. E.; Walle, T. Efflux of
591
Dietary flavonoid quercetin 4'-β-glucoside across human intestinal Caco-2 cell
592
monolayers by apical multidrug resistance-associated protein-21. J. Pharmacol.
593
Exper. Ther. 2000, 294, 830-836.
594
(32)
Boyer, J.; Brown, D.; Li. R. H. Uptake of quercetin and quercetin 3-glucoside
595
from whole onion and apple peel extracts by Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Agric.
596
Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7172-7179.
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 33
Page 25 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
597 598 599 600 601
(33)
Gao, S.; Hu, M. Bioavailability challenges associated with development of
anti-cancer phenolics. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2010, 10, 550-567. (34)
Liao, W.; McNutt, M. A.; Zhu, W. G. The comet assay: A sensitive method
for detecting DNA damage in individual cells. Methods 2009, 48, 46-53. (35)
Kanakis, C. D.; Tarantilis, P. A.; Pappas, C.; Bariyanga, J.; Tajmir-Riahi, H.
602
A.; Polissiou, M. G. An overview of structural features of DNA and RNA
603
complexes with saffron compounds: Models and antioxidant activity. J.
604
Photochem. Photobiol. B 2009, 95, 204-212.
605
(36)
Choi, H. Y.; Kim, Y. J.; Ryu, J. C. Study of genotoxicity of crocin, a
606
component of gardenia fruit, in bacterial and mammalian cell systems. Mol. Cell
607
Toxicol. 2008, 4, 285-292.
608
(37)
Hosseinzadeh, H.; Abootorabi, A.; Sadeghnia, H. R. Protective effect of
609
Crocus sativus stigma extract and crocins (trans-crocin 4) on methyl
610
methanesulfonate–induced DNA damage in mice organs. DNA Cell Biol 2008, 27,
611
657-664.
612
(38)
Bolhassani, A.; Khavari, A.; Bathaie, S. Z. Saffron and natural carotenoids:
613
Biochemical activities and anti-tumor effects. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,
614
2014, 1845, 20-30.
615
(39)
(39) Li, C. Y.; Huang, W. F.; Wang, Q. L.; Cai, F. W.; Hu, B.; Du, J. C.;
616
Wang, J.; Chen, R.; Cai, X. J.; Feng, J.; Li, H. H. Crocetin induces cytotoxicity in
617
colon cancer cell lines via p53-independent mechanisms. Asian Pac J Cancer
618
Prev, 2012, 13, 3757-3761.
619
(40)
Khavari, A.; Bolhassani, A.; Alizadeh, F.; Bathaie, S. Z.; Balaram, P.; Agi, E.;
620
Vahabpour, R. Chemo-immunotherapy using saffron and its ingredients followed
621
by E7-NT (gp96) DNA vaccine generates different anti-tumor effects against 25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
622
tumors expressing the E7 protein of human papillomavirus. Arch Virol. 2015, 160,
623
499-508.
624
(41)
Gutheil, W.G.; Reed, G.; Ray, A.; Anant, S.; Dhar, A. Crocetin: an agent
625
derived from saffron for prevention and therapy from cancer. Curr Pharm
626
Biotechnol. 2012, 13, 173-179.
627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 33
Page 27 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
647
FIGURE CAPTIONS
648 649
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the major saffron apocarotenoids.
650 651
Figure 2. Cellular transport (%) of pure picrocrocin, trans-4-GG crocetin ester and
652
crocetin across the Caco-2 cell monolayer. Cells were incubated with increasing
653
concentrations (8 - 24 µM) of the compounds for 3 h. Data are mean values ± SD of
654
three independent experiments (n = 3) and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.
655
Different lowercase letters for each compound indicate significant difference
656
according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05.
657 658
Figure 3. DNA damage in U937 cells following pretreatment with or without pure
659
picrocrocin, trans-4-GG crocetin ester and crocetin (25 µM) for 24 h followed by
660
exposure to 75 µM H2O2 for 30 min at 37 °C. DNA damage was assessed by the
661
comet assay. Data are the mean values of six independent experiments, with standard
662
errors represented by vertical bars. Statistical comparisons of the mean values were
663
performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test.
664
significantly different from that for H2O2-challenged cells (p < 0.05).
a,b,c
Mean value was
665 666
Figure 4. Cell proliferation in Caco-2 (A) and HepG2 (B) cell lines following 24 h
667
exposure to picrocrocin, trans-4-GG crocetin ester and crocetin. Cell proliferation was
668
assessed using the MTT assay. Data are the mean values ± SD of six independent
669
experiments (n = 6).
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TABLES
Table 1. IC50 Values for Picrocrocin, Trans-4-GG Crocetin Ester and Crocetin in Human Colon Adenocarcinoma Caco-2 Cells and Human Heptacarcinoma HepG2 Cells. IC50 values (µM)a
a
Caco-2 Cells
HepG2 Cells
Picrocrocin
1160 ± 0.88
1100 ± 0.13
Trans-4-GG crocetin ester
1700 ± 0.11
1250 ± 0.03
Crocetin
840 ± 0.21
750 ± 0.25
Each value is the mean of triplicate determinations ± SD.
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 33
Page 29 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
FIGURES
Figure 1
O OR2
R1O O
trans R1, R2 = glucose or gentiobiose (major crocetin esters) R1 = R2 = H (crocetin) H3C CH3O H CH3
Safranal
Picrocrocin
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 33
Page 31 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 33
Page 33 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Graphic for table of contents (TOC)
33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment