Characterization of Gaseous and Particulate ... - ACS Publications

Mar 26, 2013 - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017 72, 673-722 ... Black carbon emissions reductions from combustion of alternative jet fuel...
0 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size
Article pubs.acs.org/EF

Characterization of Gaseous and Particulate Emissions From a Turboshaft Engine Burning Conventional, Alternative, and Surrogate Fuels Jeremy Cain,† Matthew J. DeWitt,*,‡ David Blunck,§ Edwin Corporan,§ Richard Striebich,‡ David Anneken,‡ Christopher Klingshirn,‡ W. M. Roquemore,§ and Randy Vander Wal∥ †

National Research Council; Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 1790 Loop Rd. N. Bldg. 490, WPAFB, Ohio 45433-7103, United States ‡ University of Dayton Research Institute, 300 College Park, Dayton, Ohio 45469-0043, United States § Air Force Research Laboratory/Propulsion Directorate, 1790 Loop Rd. N. Bldg. 490, WPAFB, Ohio 45433-7103, United States ∥ Pennsylvania State University, 203 Hosler Bldg., University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States ABSTRACT: The effect of fuel composition on the operability and gaseous and particulate matter (PM) emissions of an Allison T63-A-700 turboshaft engine operated at four power settings was investigated in this effort. Testing was performed with a specification JP-8, a synthetic paraffinic kerosene, and four two-component surrogate mixtures that comprise compound classes within current and future alternative fuels. Comparable engine operability was observed for all fuels during this study. Major gaseous emissions were only slightly effected, with trends consistent with those expected based on the overall hydrogen content of the fuels. However, minor hydrocarbon and aldehyde emissions were significantly more sensitive to the fuel chemical composition. Linear correlations between speciated hydrocarbon and aldehyde emissions were observed over the full engine operating range for the fuels tested. The corresponding slopes were dependent on the fuel composition, indicating that fuel chemistry affects the selectivity to specific decomposition pathways. Unburned fuel components were observed in the engine exhaust during operation with all fuels, demonstrating that completely unreacted fuel compounds can pass through the high temperature/pressure combustion zone. Nonvolatile PM emissions (soot) were strongly affected by the fuel chemical composition. Paraffinic fuels produced significantly lower PM number and mass emissions relative to aromatic-containing fuels, with the paraffin structure affecting sooting propensity. The observations are consistent with those expected based on simplified soot formation mechanisms, where fuels with direct precursors for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation have higher PM formation rates. The effect of a specific chemical structure on the relative PM production is important as this would not be evident when comparing sooting tendencies of fuels based on bulk fuel properties. All fuels produced similar single log-normal size distributions of soot, with higher sooting fuels producing larger mean diameter particles. It is hypothesized that the controlling growth and formation mechanisms for PM production are similar for different fuel chemistries in this regime, with composition primarily affecting soot formation rate. This hypothesis was supported by preliminary TEM analyses that showed similar soot microstructures during operation with either conventional JP-8 or alternative fuels. Overall, this study provides additional and improved insight into the effect of fuel chemical composition on complex combustion chemistry and emissions propensity in a gas turbine engine, and can assist with the successful development of predictive modeling tools.



INTRODUCTION Worldwide aviation growth, rising fuel costs, and limited petroleum resources have resulted in a need to supplement conventional jet fuel production with alternative (nonpetroleum derived) aviation fuels. The U.S. Air Force (USAF) and the Commercial Alternative Aviation Fuel Initiative (CAAFI) have taken lead roles in evaluating and certifying alternatively derived fuels for operation in military and commercial aircraft, respectively.1 The military aviation fuel specification for JP-8 (MIL-DTL-83133F)2 was modified in 2008, and a commercial aviation fuel specification (ASTM D7566)3 was created in 2009 to allow for use of alternatively derived paraffinic kerosene fuels as blending feedstocks up to 50% by volume with petroleumderived fuels. Specifically, fuels produced via Fischer−Tropsch (F-T) synthesis [termed synthetic paraffinic kerosenes (SPKs)] or hydrodeoxygenation and hydroisomerization of triglyceridetype compounds [termed hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids © 2013 American Chemical Society

(HEFAs)] were certified for use as blending feedstocks in 2009 and 2011, respectively. SPKs and HEFAs are predominantly composed of linear and branched (iso-) paraffins, with minimal concentrations of aromatics (