Characterization of the Aldehydes and Their Transformations Induced

May 26, 2016 - treated WPEO, FMS 0#, and FMS 1# were sensory evaluated. .... the identification matches their MS spectra to those in the Mass Spectral...
0 downloads 0 Views 519KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN

Article

Characterization of the aldehydes and their transformations induced by UV irradiation and air exposure of white Guanxi honey pummelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) essential oil Li-Jun Li, Peng Hong, Feng Chen, Hao Sun, Yang Yuanfan, Xiang Yu, Gao Ling Huang, Liming Wu, and Hui Ni J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01369 • Publication Date (Web): 26 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 27, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Characterization of the Aldehydes and Their Transformations Induced by UV Irradiation and Air Exposure of White Guanxi Honey Pummelo (Citrus Grandis (L.) Osbeck) Essential Oil Li Jun Li1,2,3, Peng Hong1, Feng Chen1,4, Hao Sun1, Yuan Fan Yang1,2,3, Xiang Yu1, Gao Ling Huang1,2,3, Li Ming Wu5, Hui Ni1,2,3 1: College of Food and Biology Engineering, Jimei University, Fujian Province, P.R. China 361021 2: Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Enzyme Engineering, Xiamen, 361021, China 3: Research Center of Food Biotechnology of Xiamen City, Xiamen 361021, China 4: Department of Food, Nutrition and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA 5: Institute of Apicultural Reaseach, CAAS, Beijing, 100093 China

Professor Hui Ni College of Food and Biology Engineering Jimei University Xiamen, Fujian Province 3616021, China Phone: 13015914929 E-mail: [email protected]

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Abstract:

2

Aldehydes are key aroma contributors of citrus essential oils. White Guanxi

3

honey pummelo essential oil (WPEO) was investigated in its aldehydes constituents

4

and their transformations induced by UV irradiation and air exposure by GC-MS,

5

GC-O, and sensory evaluation. Nine aldehydes, i.e., octanal, nonanal, citronellal,

6

decanal, trans-citral, cis-citral, perilla aldehyde, dodecanal, and dodecenal were

7

detected in WPEO. After treatment, the content of citronellal increased, but the

8

concentrations of other aldehydes decreased. The aliphatic aldehydes were

9

transformed to organic acids. Citral was transformed to neric acid, geranic acid and

10

cyclocitral. Aldehyde transformation caused a remarkable decrease in the minty,

11

herbaceous and lemon notes of WPEO. In fresh WPEO, β-myrcene, d-limonene,

12

octanal, decanal, cis-citral, trans-citral, and dodecenal had highest odour dilution folds.

13

After the treatment, the dilution folds of decanal, cis-citral, trans-citral, and dodecenal

14

decreased dramatically. This result provides information for the production and

15

storage of aldehydes-containing products.

16

Keyword: Pummelo essential oil, Aldehyde, Transformation, GC-O, Ultraviolet (UV)

17

irradiation, Air exposure

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 40

Page 3 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

18

Introduction

19

Citrus essential oils (CEOs) are employed in the food, pharmaceutical and

20

perfumery industries for their attractive fragrances and antimicrobial, insect-resistant,

21

and antioxidant bioactivities. 1-4

22

As reported, CEOs are mainly composed of monoterpenes,5 aldehydes,

23

alcohols and esters.6-8 Among these chemicals, d-limonene and β-myrcene account for

24

the majority of CEOs in weight.1,

25

concentration, they contribute vitally to the aroma of CEOs due to their very low

26

threshold values.10, 11 In addition, different CEOs have great variety in the aldehydes

27

constituent. Liu et al. reported that decanal was a characteristic aroma compound of

28

Mangshanyegan, Kaopan pummelo and Eureka lemon.10 Nguyen et al. found that

29

(R)-(+)-citronellal was responsible for the characteristic aroma of Kabosu (Citrus

30

sphaerocarpa), rather than the much more abundant constituents limonene and

31

β-myrcene, which accounted for 70.5% and 20.2% of the total amount of volatiles,

32

respectively.12 Song et al. found that octanal was a characteristic aroma compound of

33

daidai (Citrus aurantium L. var. cyathifera Y. Tanaka) peel oil.13 Moreover, the

34

concentrations of aldehydes were observed to decrease during production and storage,

35

which might be related to the reactions induced by heat, sunlight and oxygen.9, 14

36

Previous studies indicated that the decrease in the aldehyde concentration might have

37

a great effect on the aroma of a CEO; for instance, Nguyen et al. reported that even a

38

0.1% decrease in the citral concentration could significantly change the aroma of

39

lemon essential oil.15 Despite all this, our understanding on the aldehyde constituents

9

Although aldehydes represent minority in

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

40

Page 4 of 40

and their effects on the aroma of CEOs is still limited.

41

Pummelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) is a traditional citrus variety of

42

Southeast Asia that is now an important and popular citrus species extensively

43

cultivated and widely consumed all over the world. Like other citrus peels, pummelo

44

peel is rich in fragrant oil;16 which has different aroma from those of other citrus

45

essential oils.2,7 Cheong et al. showed that main odorants in pink pomelo peel extract

46

were cis,trans-2,6-nonadienal, octanal, citronellal, nonanal, trans-nerolidol, indole,

47

6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one,

48

nootkatone, while the most intense aromas in white pomelo peel extract were

49

terpinolene,

50

citronellol, elemol, carvyl acetate, perilla aldehyde and indole,18 indicating the

51

different varieties of pummelo have different aroma-active constituents.

terpinolene,

terpinen-4-ol,

trans-2-heptenal,

trans-nerolidol,

trans-linalool

perilla

oxide,

alcohol

and

nootkatone,

52

White Guanxi honey pummelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) is a traditional

53

pummelo variety that has been commercially planted in Fujian province of China with

54

an approximate production of 1,200,000 tons, accounting for 40% of the total

55

production of China. As the debittering process is becoming more and more effective,

56

a few plants have been set up in southeast China to extract the juice. There are now

57

about 10,000 tons of pummelo processed in Fujian Province every year, generating

58

appropriate 2,000 tons of peels for extracting essential oil. 17

59

In recent researches, it has been shown that the essential of white Guanxi

60

honey pummelo (WPEO) mainly composed of d-limonene and β-myrcene,

61

germacrene D, geranial, neral, β-pinene, linalool, sabinene and α-pinene,2 which are 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

62

similar to the major constituents of other CEOs.10,

15, 19

63

processes, UV irradiation and oxygen exposure have been shown to have significant

64

effects on the constituents and aroma of the WPEO. 2, 13 Moreover, the accumulation

65

of linalool and limonene oxides resulted from the degradation of d-limonene is

66

illustrated to be the main reason for the strong oily and off-flavor notes.13 However,

67

the aroma-active aldehydes and their changes during the production and storage have

68

not been sufficiently investigated, yet. In this context, the aim of this study was to

69

illustrate the main aldehydes in WPEO and analyze the effects of aldehyde

70

transformations on the aroma of WPEO after UV irradiation and air exposure.

5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Furthermore, extraction

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

71

Materials and methods

72

Chemicals. A standard series of C8−C20 alkanes used for retention index (RI)

73

determination, internal standards (i.e., ethyl 2-methylbutyrate and ethyl benzoate)

74

were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Standard

75

α-pinene, sabinene, β-pinene, d-limonene, α-phellandrene, β-cis-ocimene, terpinolene,

76

perillene, β-elemene, trans-caryophyllene, nerol, geraniol, nerolidol, farnesol,

77

γ-elemene, α-humulene, linalool, octanal, nonanal, citronellal, decanal, carvone, and

78

citral (mixture of neral and geranial) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (St.

79

Louis, MO, USA); β-myrcene, perilla aldehyde, dodecanal, dodecenal, octanoic acid,

80

citral acid (mixture of neric acid and geranic acid), chrysanthemol, carveol (mixture of

81

cis- and trans-), neryl acetate, geranyl acetate, linalool oxide (mixture of cis- and

82

trans-), and limonene oxide (mixture of cis- and trans-) were purchased from Alfa

83

Aesar Co. Ltd. (Heysham, Lancashire, U.K.); α-pinene oxide, caryophyllene oxide,

84

and nootkatone were purchased from Ormah Chemical, Inc. Tic Co. (TIC, Hadimkoy,

85

Istanbul); indole and octanoic acid were purchased from Penta Manufacturing Co.

86

(PMC, Livingston, NJ, USA). HPLC grade n-hexane was purchased from Oceanpak

87

Chemical Company (Gothenburg, Sweden). Other chemicals were obtained from

88

Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

89

Identifying the aldehydes and investigating the concentration changes in

90

WPEO after UV irradiation and air exposure. White GuanXi honey pummelo, a

91

native pummelo species in southeastern China, was harvested after fully ripe with

92

yellow color by Fujian GuoNong Agricultural Development Co. (PingHe County, 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 40

Page 7 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

93

Fujian province, China) in October 2014. The fresh flavedo with oil sacs was

94

mechanically pressed to squeeze the oil into a tube containing icy brine water. Then,

95

the oil-water mixture was centrifuged at 13,500 g for 5 min then dried with Na2SO4 to

96

collect fresh WPEO, then stored in -20 ºC.9 Total 10.8 g of WPEO was extracted from

97

2,000 g of pummelo peel. To prepare the UV-irradiation and air-exposure co-treated

98

sample, 500 µl fresh WPEO was pipetted into small glass tubes (2 mL, 12×32 mm

99

bottle diameter 9 mm, borosilicate material) that were then filled with air and sealed

100

with a screw cap. The tubes were then irradiated under two ZXC-II×2 UV modulator

101

tubes with a peak emission at 305 nm (Yuejin Medical Optical Instruments Factory,

102

Shanghai, China) at a distance of 5 cm for 40 h using a power of 40 W and a

103

temperature of approximately 25 ˚C. Thereafter, both the fresh and the treated WPEOs

104

were subjected to the analysis of their volatile constituents using gas chromatography

105

coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after dilution.

106

Identifying the reaction pathways and inducing factors of aldehyde

107

transformation. Single standard aldehydes without solvent dilution, i.e., octanal

108

(99%), nonanal (96%), citronellal (96%), decanal (95%), citral (97%, mixture of

109

trans-citral and cis-citral), perilla aldehyde (92%), dodecanal (95%), and dodecenal

110

(93%) were treated with air exposure (Sample 1#), UV irradiation (Sample 2#) or a

111

combination of both (Sample 3#), respectively. In short, for the preparation of the

112

air-exposed aldehydes (Sample 1#), 500 µL of each aldehyde standards were pipetted

113

into small glass tubes that were then filled with air, sealed with a screw cap and stored

114

in the dark at 25 ˚C for 40 h. To prepare the UV-irradiated samples (Sample 2#), 500 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

115

µL of each aldehyde standards was pipetted into a small glass tube that was filled with

116

nitrogen, sealed with a screw cap, and irradiated under UV using the procedure

117

described in the section “Investigating the concentration change of aldehydes in

118

WPEO after UV irradiation and air exposure”. To prepare the samples undergoing the

119

co-treatment of UV irradiation and air exposure (Sample 3#), 500 µL of each

120

aldehyde standards was pipetted into a small glass tube that was filled with air, sealed

121

using a screw cap, and exposed under UV irradiation using the procedure described

122

above. Afterwards, the constituents of the samples were analyzed using GC-MS after

123

dilution.

124

Calculation of odor activity values (OAVs). Both the fresh and treated

125

WPEOs were analyzed for their odor activity values (OAVs) using the equation

126

OAV=c/t, where “c” is the concentration of a compound in the WPEO samples and “t”

127

is the odor threshold value of a compound in water, as collected from the literature. 10,

128

20-22

129

Omission Experiment. Flavor models sample (FMS) reported by Sun et. al.

130

was used to investigate the contributions of some aroma-impact volatiles to the

131

change of the aroma profile.9 In this study, fresh WPEO (FMS 0#) and

132

aldehyde-transformed WPEO (FMS 1#) were constructed to illustrate the effects of

133

the aldehyde transformation on the aromas using sensory evaluation. In detail, based

134

on the GC-O, OAV analysis, sensory evaluation and the study of Sun et al.,9 FMS 0#

135

was prepared with a composition of β-myrcene (220,000 µg/mL), octanal (800

136

µg/mL), d-limonene (500,000 µg/mL), linalool (2,700 µg/mL), decanal (2,000 µg/mL), 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 40

Page 9 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

137

citral (mixtu re of trans- and cis-, 17,000 µg/mL), dodecanal (200 µg/mL) and

138

nootkatone (1,000 µg/mL). (Note: because there were some other compounds

139

contributing to floral and pummelo note in addition to linalool and nootkatone, FMS

140

was formulated with linalool and nootkatone at higher concentrations than their

141

counterparts in PEO so that the floral and pummelo note attained the intensity as same

142

as those of the fresh WPEO). FMS 1# (only lower concentration of aldehydes

143

compared to FMS 0#) contained β-myrcene (220,000 µg/mL), octanal (500 µg/mL),

144

d-limonene (500,000 µg/mL), linalool (2,700 µg/mL), decanal (1,000 µg/mL), citral

145

(mixture of trans- and cis- citral) (2,000 µg/mL), dodecanal (100 µg/mL), and

146

nootkatone (1,000 µg/mL) and was produced by reducing the aldehyde contents of

147

FMS 0# according to the decreased concentration in the WPEO after the co-treatment

148

of UV irradiation and air exposure. Then, the odors of the fresh WPEO, treated

149

WPEO, FMS 0# and FMS 1# were sensory evaluated.

150

Gas chromatography-olfactory (GC-O) analysis. An Agilent 7890A was

151

equipped with a FID and olfactory detection port Gerstel ODP-2 (Gerstel AG

152

Enterprise, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany). The GC was fitted with a 60 m×0.32

153

mm×0.25 µm Rtx-wax column (Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The oven

154

temperature was programmed as follows: an initial temperature of 40 °C was kept for

155

3 min, the temperature was then increased to 130 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min, and then

156

increased to 230 ºC at a speed of 5 ºC/min, finally kept at 230 °C for 3 min. Nitrogen

157

was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.8 ml/min. The temperature of the

158

injector port was 250 °C, and a 0.2 µL sample was injected into the GC-O system in 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

159

splitless mode. The sniffing port was held at 250 ºC to prevent any condensation of

160

volatile compounds.

161

Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) was used. A series of 4-fold dilutions

162

(i.e. 40, 41, 42, 43) of the fresh WPEO and the treated WPEO samples were prepared

163

using dichloromethane as a solvent.10 The odor characteristics and flavor dilution (FD)

164

factors were evaluated by an expert in fragrance chemicals and flavor technology.

165

Operation of gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry

166

(GC-MS) to analyze the volatile compounds. A QP 2010 Plus gas chromatograph

167

coupled with a mass spectrometer was purchased from Shimadzu Corporation (Kyoto,

168

Japan). One microliter of sample was injected for the analysis. Helium was used as

169

the carrier gas, and the column flow rate was 3 ml/min. The injector temperature was

170

set to 250 ºC, and the split ratio was 1:5. The oven temperature was initially

171

programmed to 50 ºC for 3 min and then increased to 220 ºC at a speed of 5 ºC/min

172

and held at this temperature for 3 minutes. The temperatures of the ion source and the

173

interface were both set to 250 ºC. The MS spectrum was operated in positive electron

174

ionization mode at 70 eV. The MS spectra were recorded within an m/z range from 29

175

to 500 amu.

176

Identification of the volatiles was performed using a 60 m×0.32 mm×0.25 µm

177

Rtx-5MS column and a 60 m×0.32 mm×0.25 µm Rtx-wax column (Restek

178

Corporation, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Most of the volatiles were identified by matching

179

their MS spectra and Kovats retention indices (RI) to those of standards on both

180

columns. In addition, other volatiles lacking a standard were identified by matching 10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 40

Page 11 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

181

their MS spectra to those in the Mass Spectral Library (NIST08, NIST08s, FFNSC 1.3)

182

and their RIs to those from relevant references or the database book.

183

The compounds for which standards were purchased were quantified on the

184

Rtx-5MS column using their respective calibration curves, plotted in selective ion

185

monitoring (SIM) (Supplemental Table 1) mode according to the signal intensity of a

186

series concentration, during which internal references ethyl 2-methylbutyrate and

187

ethyl benzoate were used to correct the error. The concentrations of the volatiles that

188

lacked standards were estimated by matching the signal intensity to the calibration

189

curve of the internal reference ethyl benzoate obtained from Scan mode.

190

Sensory evaluation of aroma. The sensory evaluation was conducted by 18

191

trained panelists, including 8 women and 7 men in the age range of 20 to 30 years and

192

1 woman and 2 men in the age range of 30 to 40 years. Before the sensory evaluation,

193

the panelists were instructed to be familiar with the odors of the standards as

194

necessary. The panelists were asked to rate the WPEOs in a random order for sweet,

195

minty, herbaceous, lemon, floral and oily notes and gave a score within the range 0-9

196

according to relevant references and ISO 8589,22-24 in which 0 indicates an

197

unperceived attribute intensity and 9 indicates a very strong attribute intensity. The

198

odors of limonene oxides, carvone and citral (mixture of trans- and cis-) were used to

199

train panelists to score the sweet, minty and herbaceous notes, respectively. A mixture

200

of nootkatone and d-limonene was used to train panelists to score the lemon odor, a

201

mixture of geraniol and β-myrcene was used to train the panelists to score the floral

202

odor, and a mixture of linalool oxides and α-terpineol was used to train panelists to 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

203

score the oily note. Among these notes, herbaceous and lemon aromas contributed to

204

the fresh odor and sweet and floral aromas contributed to the ripened odor (reduced

205

freshness), while the oily aroma was an off-flavor similar to a machinery oil or

206

resinous material.25 Mean values were calculated after correcting for the effects of the

207

session and the removal of outliers. An interval gap of 20 s was used, which was

208

sufficient to separate between the individual odour assessments.

209

Statistical analysis. All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The

210

means and standard deviations were calculated using the SPSS-IBM 19.0 software

211

and Microsoft Excel 2013. Significant difference analysis was performed by ANOVA

212

and Duncan’s multiple range tests using SPSS-IBM 19.0 software.

213

12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 40

Page 13 of 40

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

214

Results and discussion

215

The aldehyde constituents in fresh WPEO and the relative change after

216

UV irradiation and air exposure. 49 compounds were detected in the WPEOs (Table

217

1), among which 41 volatiles were identified by matching their RI and MS spectra

218

with those of standards and the other 8 volatiles were identified by searching the MS

219

library and comparing the RIs with those from related references.10, 24, 26-31 Among

220

these chemicals, nine were aldehydes (Table 1), including octanal, nonanal, citronellal,

221

decanal, trans-citral, cis-citral, perilla aldehyde, dodecanal, and dodecenal. Liu et al.,

222

who found 12 aldehydes (including all the 9 aldehydes of the present study) in the

223

essential oils of Mangshanyegan (Citrus nobilis Lauriro), Kaopan pummelo (Citrus

224

grandis), Eureka lemon (Citrus limon), Huangyanbendizao tangerine (Citrus

225

reticulata), and Seike navel orange (Citrus sinensis).10 Furthermore, the five citrus

226

essential oils have been detected to have different aldehydes components, e.g., the

227

essential oils of Eureka lemon, Huangyanbendizao tangerine, and Seike navel orange

228

contain all the 12 aldehydes, while the counterparts of Mangshanyegan and Kaopan

229

pummelo have 10 and 5 aldehydes.10 In addition, even the pink and red pomelo

230

(Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) peel have different aldehyde compositions, the red

231

pomelo peel contains 14 aldehydes, including hexanal, octanal, nonanal, citronellal,

232

decanal, neral, geranial, dodecanal, tridecanal, trans,trans-2,4-decadienal, perillic

233

aldehyde, tetradecanal, α-sinensal and β-sinensal; whereas the white pomelo has 6

234

aldehydes, i.e., citronellal, neral, geranial, perillia aldehyde, α-sinensal and

235

β-sinensal.32 In comparison, the aldehydes in the present study are different from 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

236

those in other citrus essential oils, which is identical to previous studies that the peels

237

of citrus fruits have different aldehydes. 10

238

Based on the identification, the calibration curves of 41 volatile standards

239

(Table 2) were plotted to analyze the concentration changes of the volatile compounds.

240

As the result (Table 2), the concentrations of octanal, nonanal, decanal, dodecanal,

241

dodecenal, perilla aldehyde, trans-citral, and cis-citral decreased by 13.8, 28.3, 40.5,

242

37.8, 85.4, 33.9, 85.6 and 82.1% (p