Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN
Article
Characterization of the aldehydes and their transformations induced by UV irradiation and air exposure of white Guanxi honey pummelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) essential oil Li-Jun Li, Peng Hong, Feng Chen, Hao Sun, Yang Yuanfan, Xiang Yu, Gao Ling Huang, Liming Wu, and Hui Ni J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01369 • Publication Date (Web): 26 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 27, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Characterization of the Aldehydes and Their Transformations Induced by UV Irradiation and Air Exposure of White Guanxi Honey Pummelo (Citrus Grandis (L.) Osbeck) Essential Oil Li Jun Li1,2,3, Peng Hong1, Feng Chen1,4, Hao Sun1, Yuan Fan Yang1,2,3, Xiang Yu1, Gao Ling Huang1,2,3, Li Ming Wu5, Hui Ni1,2,3 1: College of Food and Biology Engineering, Jimei University, Fujian Province, P.R. China 361021 2: Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Enzyme Engineering, Xiamen, 361021, China 3: Research Center of Food Biotechnology of Xiamen City, Xiamen 361021, China 4: Department of Food, Nutrition and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA 5: Institute of Apicultural Reaseach, CAAS, Beijing, 100093 China
Professor Hui Ni College of Food and Biology Engineering Jimei University Xiamen, Fujian Province 3616021, China Phone: 13015914929 E-mail:
[email protected] 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Abstract:
2
Aldehydes are key aroma contributors of citrus essential oils. White Guanxi
3
honey pummelo essential oil (WPEO) was investigated in its aldehydes constituents
4
and their transformations induced by UV irradiation and air exposure by GC-MS,
5
GC-O, and sensory evaluation. Nine aldehydes, i.e., octanal, nonanal, citronellal,
6
decanal, trans-citral, cis-citral, perilla aldehyde, dodecanal, and dodecenal were
7
detected in WPEO. After treatment, the content of citronellal increased, but the
8
concentrations of other aldehydes decreased. The aliphatic aldehydes were
9
transformed to organic acids. Citral was transformed to neric acid, geranic acid and
10
cyclocitral. Aldehyde transformation caused a remarkable decrease in the minty,
11
herbaceous and lemon notes of WPEO. In fresh WPEO, β-myrcene, d-limonene,
12
octanal, decanal, cis-citral, trans-citral, and dodecenal had highest odour dilution folds.
13
After the treatment, the dilution folds of decanal, cis-citral, trans-citral, and dodecenal
14
decreased dramatically. This result provides information for the production and
15
storage of aldehydes-containing products.
16
Keyword: Pummelo essential oil, Aldehyde, Transformation, GC-O, Ultraviolet (UV)
17
irradiation, Air exposure
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 40
Page 3 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
18
Introduction
19
Citrus essential oils (CEOs) are employed in the food, pharmaceutical and
20
perfumery industries for their attractive fragrances and antimicrobial, insect-resistant,
21
and antioxidant bioactivities. 1-4
22
As reported, CEOs are mainly composed of monoterpenes,5 aldehydes,
23
alcohols and esters.6-8 Among these chemicals, d-limonene and β-myrcene account for
24
the majority of CEOs in weight.1,
25
concentration, they contribute vitally to the aroma of CEOs due to their very low
26
threshold values.10, 11 In addition, different CEOs have great variety in the aldehydes
27
constituent. Liu et al. reported that decanal was a characteristic aroma compound of
28
Mangshanyegan, Kaopan pummelo and Eureka lemon.10 Nguyen et al. found that
29
(R)-(+)-citronellal was responsible for the characteristic aroma of Kabosu (Citrus
30
sphaerocarpa), rather than the much more abundant constituents limonene and
31
β-myrcene, which accounted for 70.5% and 20.2% of the total amount of volatiles,
32
respectively.12 Song et al. found that octanal was a characteristic aroma compound of
33
daidai (Citrus aurantium L. var. cyathifera Y. Tanaka) peel oil.13 Moreover, the
34
concentrations of aldehydes were observed to decrease during production and storage,
35
which might be related to the reactions induced by heat, sunlight and oxygen.9, 14
36
Previous studies indicated that the decrease in the aldehyde concentration might have
37
a great effect on the aroma of a CEO; for instance, Nguyen et al. reported that even a
38
0.1% decrease in the citral concentration could significantly change the aroma of
39
lemon essential oil.15 Despite all this, our understanding on the aldehyde constituents
9
Although aldehydes represent minority in
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
40
Page 4 of 40
and their effects on the aroma of CEOs is still limited.
41
Pummelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) is a traditional citrus variety of
42
Southeast Asia that is now an important and popular citrus species extensively
43
cultivated and widely consumed all over the world. Like other citrus peels, pummelo
44
peel is rich in fragrant oil;16 which has different aroma from those of other citrus
45
essential oils.2,7 Cheong et al. showed that main odorants in pink pomelo peel extract
46
were cis,trans-2,6-nonadienal, octanal, citronellal, nonanal, trans-nerolidol, indole,
47
6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one,
48
nootkatone, while the most intense aromas in white pomelo peel extract were
49
terpinolene,
50
citronellol, elemol, carvyl acetate, perilla aldehyde and indole,18 indicating the
51
different varieties of pummelo have different aroma-active constituents.
terpinolene,
terpinen-4-ol,
trans-2-heptenal,
trans-nerolidol,
trans-linalool
perilla
oxide,
alcohol
and
nootkatone,
52
White Guanxi honey pummelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) is a traditional
53
pummelo variety that has been commercially planted in Fujian province of China with
54
an approximate production of 1,200,000 tons, accounting for 40% of the total
55
production of China. As the debittering process is becoming more and more effective,
56
a few plants have been set up in southeast China to extract the juice. There are now
57
about 10,000 tons of pummelo processed in Fujian Province every year, generating
58
appropriate 2,000 tons of peels for extracting essential oil. 17
59
In recent researches, it has been shown that the essential of white Guanxi
60
honey pummelo (WPEO) mainly composed of d-limonene and β-myrcene,
61
germacrene D, geranial, neral, β-pinene, linalool, sabinene and α-pinene,2 which are 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
62
similar to the major constituents of other CEOs.10,
15, 19
63
processes, UV irradiation and oxygen exposure have been shown to have significant
64
effects on the constituents and aroma of the WPEO. 2, 13 Moreover, the accumulation
65
of linalool and limonene oxides resulted from the degradation of d-limonene is
66
illustrated to be the main reason for the strong oily and off-flavor notes.13 However,
67
the aroma-active aldehydes and their changes during the production and storage have
68
not been sufficiently investigated, yet. In this context, the aim of this study was to
69
illustrate the main aldehydes in WPEO and analyze the effects of aldehyde
70
transformations on the aroma of WPEO after UV irradiation and air exposure.
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Furthermore, extraction
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
71
Materials and methods
72
Chemicals. A standard series of C8−C20 alkanes used for retention index (RI)
73
determination, internal standards (i.e., ethyl 2-methylbutyrate and ethyl benzoate)
74
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Standard
75
α-pinene, sabinene, β-pinene, d-limonene, α-phellandrene, β-cis-ocimene, terpinolene,
76
perillene, β-elemene, trans-caryophyllene, nerol, geraniol, nerolidol, farnesol,
77
γ-elemene, α-humulene, linalool, octanal, nonanal, citronellal, decanal, carvone, and
78
citral (mixture of neral and geranial) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (St.
79
Louis, MO, USA); β-myrcene, perilla aldehyde, dodecanal, dodecenal, octanoic acid,
80
citral acid (mixture of neric acid and geranic acid), chrysanthemol, carveol (mixture of
81
cis- and trans-), neryl acetate, geranyl acetate, linalool oxide (mixture of cis- and
82
trans-), and limonene oxide (mixture of cis- and trans-) were purchased from Alfa
83
Aesar Co. Ltd. (Heysham, Lancashire, U.K.); α-pinene oxide, caryophyllene oxide,
84
and nootkatone were purchased from Ormah Chemical, Inc. Tic Co. (TIC, Hadimkoy,
85
Istanbul); indole and octanoic acid were purchased from Penta Manufacturing Co.
86
(PMC, Livingston, NJ, USA). HPLC grade n-hexane was purchased from Oceanpak
87
Chemical Company (Gothenburg, Sweden). Other chemicals were obtained from
88
Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
89
Identifying the aldehydes and investigating the concentration changes in
90
WPEO after UV irradiation and air exposure. White GuanXi honey pummelo, a
91
native pummelo species in southeastern China, was harvested after fully ripe with
92
yellow color by Fujian GuoNong Agricultural Development Co. (PingHe County, 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 40
Page 7 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
93
Fujian province, China) in October 2014. The fresh flavedo with oil sacs was
94
mechanically pressed to squeeze the oil into a tube containing icy brine water. Then,
95
the oil-water mixture was centrifuged at 13,500 g for 5 min then dried with Na2SO4 to
96
collect fresh WPEO, then stored in -20 ºC.9 Total 10.8 g of WPEO was extracted from
97
2,000 g of pummelo peel. To prepare the UV-irradiation and air-exposure co-treated
98
sample, 500 µl fresh WPEO was pipetted into small glass tubes (2 mL, 12×32 mm
99
bottle diameter 9 mm, borosilicate material) that were then filled with air and sealed
100
with a screw cap. The tubes were then irradiated under two ZXC-II×2 UV modulator
101
tubes with a peak emission at 305 nm (Yuejin Medical Optical Instruments Factory,
102
Shanghai, China) at a distance of 5 cm for 40 h using a power of 40 W and a
103
temperature of approximately 25 ˚C. Thereafter, both the fresh and the treated WPEOs
104
were subjected to the analysis of their volatile constituents using gas chromatography
105
coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after dilution.
106
Identifying the reaction pathways and inducing factors of aldehyde
107
transformation. Single standard aldehydes without solvent dilution, i.e., octanal
108
(99%), nonanal (96%), citronellal (96%), decanal (95%), citral (97%, mixture of
109
trans-citral and cis-citral), perilla aldehyde (92%), dodecanal (95%), and dodecenal
110
(93%) were treated with air exposure (Sample 1#), UV irradiation (Sample 2#) or a
111
combination of both (Sample 3#), respectively. In short, for the preparation of the
112
air-exposed aldehydes (Sample 1#), 500 µL of each aldehyde standards were pipetted
113
into small glass tubes that were then filled with air, sealed with a screw cap and stored
114
in the dark at 25 ˚C for 40 h. To prepare the UV-irradiated samples (Sample 2#), 500 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
115
µL of each aldehyde standards was pipetted into a small glass tube that was filled with
116
nitrogen, sealed with a screw cap, and irradiated under UV using the procedure
117
described in the section “Investigating the concentration change of aldehydes in
118
WPEO after UV irradiation and air exposure”. To prepare the samples undergoing the
119
co-treatment of UV irradiation and air exposure (Sample 3#), 500 µL of each
120
aldehyde standards was pipetted into a small glass tube that was filled with air, sealed
121
using a screw cap, and exposed under UV irradiation using the procedure described
122
above. Afterwards, the constituents of the samples were analyzed using GC-MS after
123
dilution.
124
Calculation of odor activity values (OAVs). Both the fresh and treated
125
WPEOs were analyzed for their odor activity values (OAVs) using the equation
126
OAV=c/t, where “c” is the concentration of a compound in the WPEO samples and “t”
127
is the odor threshold value of a compound in water, as collected from the literature. 10,
128
20-22
129
Omission Experiment. Flavor models sample (FMS) reported by Sun et. al.
130
was used to investigate the contributions of some aroma-impact volatiles to the
131
change of the aroma profile.9 In this study, fresh WPEO (FMS 0#) and
132
aldehyde-transformed WPEO (FMS 1#) were constructed to illustrate the effects of
133
the aldehyde transformation on the aromas using sensory evaluation. In detail, based
134
on the GC-O, OAV analysis, sensory evaluation and the study of Sun et al.,9 FMS 0#
135
was prepared with a composition of β-myrcene (220,000 µg/mL), octanal (800
136
µg/mL), d-limonene (500,000 µg/mL), linalool (2,700 µg/mL), decanal (2,000 µg/mL), 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 40
Page 9 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
137
citral (mixtu re of trans- and cis-, 17,000 µg/mL), dodecanal (200 µg/mL) and
138
nootkatone (1,000 µg/mL). (Note: because there were some other compounds
139
contributing to floral and pummelo note in addition to linalool and nootkatone, FMS
140
was formulated with linalool and nootkatone at higher concentrations than their
141
counterparts in PEO so that the floral and pummelo note attained the intensity as same
142
as those of the fresh WPEO). FMS 1# (only lower concentration of aldehydes
143
compared to FMS 0#) contained β-myrcene (220,000 µg/mL), octanal (500 µg/mL),
144
d-limonene (500,000 µg/mL), linalool (2,700 µg/mL), decanal (1,000 µg/mL), citral
145
(mixture of trans- and cis- citral) (2,000 µg/mL), dodecanal (100 µg/mL), and
146
nootkatone (1,000 µg/mL) and was produced by reducing the aldehyde contents of
147
FMS 0# according to the decreased concentration in the WPEO after the co-treatment
148
of UV irradiation and air exposure. Then, the odors of the fresh WPEO, treated
149
WPEO, FMS 0# and FMS 1# were sensory evaluated.
150
Gas chromatography-olfactory (GC-O) analysis. An Agilent 7890A was
151
equipped with a FID and olfactory detection port Gerstel ODP-2 (Gerstel AG
152
Enterprise, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany). The GC was fitted with a 60 m×0.32
153
mm×0.25 µm Rtx-wax column (Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The oven
154
temperature was programmed as follows: an initial temperature of 40 °C was kept for
155
3 min, the temperature was then increased to 130 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min, and then
156
increased to 230 ºC at a speed of 5 ºC/min, finally kept at 230 °C for 3 min. Nitrogen
157
was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.8 ml/min. The temperature of the
158
injector port was 250 °C, and a 0.2 µL sample was injected into the GC-O system in 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
159
splitless mode. The sniffing port was held at 250 ºC to prevent any condensation of
160
volatile compounds.
161
Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) was used. A series of 4-fold dilutions
162
(i.e. 40, 41, 42, 43) of the fresh WPEO and the treated WPEO samples were prepared
163
using dichloromethane as a solvent.10 The odor characteristics and flavor dilution (FD)
164
factors were evaluated by an expert in fragrance chemicals and flavor technology.
165
Operation of gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry
166
(GC-MS) to analyze the volatile compounds. A QP 2010 Plus gas chromatograph
167
coupled with a mass spectrometer was purchased from Shimadzu Corporation (Kyoto,
168
Japan). One microliter of sample was injected for the analysis. Helium was used as
169
the carrier gas, and the column flow rate was 3 ml/min. The injector temperature was
170
set to 250 ºC, and the split ratio was 1:5. The oven temperature was initially
171
programmed to 50 ºC for 3 min and then increased to 220 ºC at a speed of 5 ºC/min
172
and held at this temperature for 3 minutes. The temperatures of the ion source and the
173
interface were both set to 250 ºC. The MS spectrum was operated in positive electron
174
ionization mode at 70 eV. The MS spectra were recorded within an m/z range from 29
175
to 500 amu.
176
Identification of the volatiles was performed using a 60 m×0.32 mm×0.25 µm
177
Rtx-5MS column and a 60 m×0.32 mm×0.25 µm Rtx-wax column (Restek
178
Corporation, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Most of the volatiles were identified by matching
179
their MS spectra and Kovats retention indices (RI) to those of standards on both
180
columns. In addition, other volatiles lacking a standard were identified by matching 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 40
Page 11 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
181
their MS spectra to those in the Mass Spectral Library (NIST08, NIST08s, FFNSC 1.3)
182
and their RIs to those from relevant references or the database book.
183
The compounds for which standards were purchased were quantified on the
184
Rtx-5MS column using their respective calibration curves, plotted in selective ion
185
monitoring (SIM) (Supplemental Table 1) mode according to the signal intensity of a
186
series concentration, during which internal references ethyl 2-methylbutyrate and
187
ethyl benzoate were used to correct the error. The concentrations of the volatiles that
188
lacked standards were estimated by matching the signal intensity to the calibration
189
curve of the internal reference ethyl benzoate obtained from Scan mode.
190
Sensory evaluation of aroma. The sensory evaluation was conducted by 18
191
trained panelists, including 8 women and 7 men in the age range of 20 to 30 years and
192
1 woman and 2 men in the age range of 30 to 40 years. Before the sensory evaluation,
193
the panelists were instructed to be familiar with the odors of the standards as
194
necessary. The panelists were asked to rate the WPEOs in a random order for sweet,
195
minty, herbaceous, lemon, floral and oily notes and gave a score within the range 0-9
196
according to relevant references and ISO 8589,22-24 in which 0 indicates an
197
unperceived attribute intensity and 9 indicates a very strong attribute intensity. The
198
odors of limonene oxides, carvone and citral (mixture of trans- and cis-) were used to
199
train panelists to score the sweet, minty and herbaceous notes, respectively. A mixture
200
of nootkatone and d-limonene was used to train panelists to score the lemon odor, a
201
mixture of geraniol and β-myrcene was used to train the panelists to score the floral
202
odor, and a mixture of linalool oxides and α-terpineol was used to train panelists to 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
203
score the oily note. Among these notes, herbaceous and lemon aromas contributed to
204
the fresh odor and sweet and floral aromas contributed to the ripened odor (reduced
205
freshness), while the oily aroma was an off-flavor similar to a machinery oil or
206
resinous material.25 Mean values were calculated after correcting for the effects of the
207
session and the removal of outliers. An interval gap of 20 s was used, which was
208
sufficient to separate between the individual odour assessments.
209
Statistical analysis. All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The
210
means and standard deviations were calculated using the SPSS-IBM 19.0 software
211
and Microsoft Excel 2013. Significant difference analysis was performed by ANOVA
212
and Duncan’s multiple range tests using SPSS-IBM 19.0 software.
213
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 40
Page 13 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
214
Results and discussion
215
The aldehyde constituents in fresh WPEO and the relative change after
216
UV irradiation and air exposure. 49 compounds were detected in the WPEOs (Table
217
1), among which 41 volatiles were identified by matching their RI and MS spectra
218
with those of standards and the other 8 volatiles were identified by searching the MS
219
library and comparing the RIs with those from related references.10, 24, 26-31 Among
220
these chemicals, nine were aldehydes (Table 1), including octanal, nonanal, citronellal,
221
decanal, trans-citral, cis-citral, perilla aldehyde, dodecanal, and dodecenal. Liu et al.,
222
who found 12 aldehydes (including all the 9 aldehydes of the present study) in the
223
essential oils of Mangshanyegan (Citrus nobilis Lauriro), Kaopan pummelo (Citrus
224
grandis), Eureka lemon (Citrus limon), Huangyanbendizao tangerine (Citrus
225
reticulata), and Seike navel orange (Citrus sinensis).10 Furthermore, the five citrus
226
essential oils have been detected to have different aldehydes components, e.g., the
227
essential oils of Eureka lemon, Huangyanbendizao tangerine, and Seike navel orange
228
contain all the 12 aldehydes, while the counterparts of Mangshanyegan and Kaopan
229
pummelo have 10 and 5 aldehydes.10 In addition, even the pink and red pomelo
230
(Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) peel have different aldehyde compositions, the red
231
pomelo peel contains 14 aldehydes, including hexanal, octanal, nonanal, citronellal,
232
decanal, neral, geranial, dodecanal, tridecanal, trans,trans-2,4-decadienal, perillic
233
aldehyde, tetradecanal, α-sinensal and β-sinensal; whereas the white pomelo has 6
234
aldehydes, i.e., citronellal, neral, geranial, perillia aldehyde, α-sinensal and
235
β-sinensal.32 In comparison, the aldehydes in the present study are different from 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
236
those in other citrus essential oils, which is identical to previous studies that the peels
237
of citrus fruits have different aldehydes. 10
238
Based on the identification, the calibration curves of 41 volatile standards
239
(Table 2) were plotted to analyze the concentration changes of the volatile compounds.
240
As the result (Table 2), the concentrations of octanal, nonanal, decanal, dodecanal,
241
dodecenal, perilla aldehyde, trans-citral, and cis-citral decreased by 13.8, 28.3, 40.5,
242
37.8, 85.4, 33.9, 85.6 and 82.1% (p