Subscriber access provided by UOW Library
C: Surfaces, Interfaces, Porous Materials, and Catalysis 3
Chemisorption of NH on Monomeric Vanadium Oxide Supported on Anatase TiO: A Combined DRIFT and DFT Study 2
Inhak Song, Jaeha Lee, Geonhee Lee, Jeong Woo Han, and DoHeui Kim J. Phys. Chem. C, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02291 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 10, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
1
Chemisorption of NH3 on Monomeric Vanadium
2
Oxide Supported on Anatase TiO2: A Combined
3
DRIFT and DFT Study
4
Inhak Song†, Jaeha Lee†, Geonhee Lee‡, Jeong Woo Han*,§, Do Heui Kim*,†
5
†School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul
6
National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
7
‡Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Republic of Korea
8
§Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology
9
(POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
10 11
Corresponding Author
12
*Corresponding author:
[email protected],
[email protected] 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 31
1
ABSTRACT
2
V/TiO2 catalysts are used in various reactions including oxidative dehydrogenation, partial
3
oxidation of ethanol, and selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. In this work, we
4
investigated the effect of supported monomeric vanadium oxide (VO3) on the acidity of anatase
5
TiO2(101) surface by using density functional theory (DFT) calculations combined with in situ
6
DRIFT experiments. The hydrogenation of TiO2 to form hydroxyl groups on the surface was
7
energetically more favorable in the presence of the supported monomeric vanadium oxide.
8
Charge transfer between TiO2 support and VO3 was considered as an origin of –OH stabilization,
9
which made Brønsted acid sites more abundant on V/TiO2 surface than on TiO2. Also, it was
10
observed that cationic vanadium center in VO3 can act as much weaker Lewis acid sites than
11
Titanium center in TiO2. Such weakened acidity of Lewis acid sites in the presence of
12
monomeric vanadium oxide was consistently observed in in situ DRIFT results, which could
13
explain the higher reactivity of NH3 adsorbed on Lewis acid sites of V/TiO2 than those of TiO2
14
in the NH3-SCR reaction.
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Page 3 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
1. Introduction
2
Vanadium oxide supported on anatase titania catalyst (VOx/TiO2) is active for various
3
reactions including selective oxidation or reduction.1-5 It has been well known as a conventional
4
catalyst used in the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) process, which selectively reduce harmful
5
NOx with NH3 in lean conditions.6-9 Many researches have been perfomed to investigate
6
structure-activity relationship in VOx/TiO2 catalyst, where it is widely accepted that the degree of
7
polymerization of vanadia on TiO2 is a key factor to determine the activity or selectivity in the
8
reaction.10-11
9
There are, however, relatively few papers addressing the acidic properties of VOx/TiO2
10
catalyst. Supported vanadium oxide catalysts are known to have two kinds of acidic sites on the
11
surface, Lewis acid sites and Brønsted acid sites.12 The standard SCR reaction usually occur with
12
Eley-Rideal mechanism, which means that the NH3 adsorbed on the acidic sites of catalysts can
13
reduce gaseous NO molecule.13-14 Hence, the site at which NH3 molecules are adsorbed is an
14
important factor in determining the activity or selectivity of the SCR reaction.15 In fact, it has
15
been long controversy as to which NH3 molecules are involved in the reaction more dominantly.
16
For example, Ramis et al. claimed that NH3 molecule can be chemisorbed and activated on
17
Lewis acid sites, which subsequently reacts with NO to form the intermediate species.16-17 Their
18
key observation from DRIFT study was that NH3 adsorbed on Lewis acid sites can react more
19
actively than that on Brønsted acid sites. Meanwhile, Topsøe et al. found correlation between the
20
amount of Brønsted acid sites and the SCR activity.18-19 By varying vanadium loading on TiO2,
21
they found that increasing V loading can raise the number of Brønsted acid sites, which leads to
22
the enhanced activity. It is obvious that NH3 on Lewis acid sites initially participates in the
23
reaction with NO, while NH3 on Brønsted acid sites also seem to play a certain role in the
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 31
1
reaction, rather than exist as a spectator. In the case of oxidative dehydrogenation with
2
VOx/TiO2, it was reported that the selectivity of reaction is a function of acid-base properties of
3
catalyst because the acid sites play an important role in adsorbing alkane molecule and its
4
activated form on the surface.20-21 Thus, understanding the acidic nature of VOx/TiO2 catalyst is
5
quite important to precisely analyze the reaction.
6
Recently, many attempts have been made to investigate VOx/TiO2 system by various
7
theoretical methods. Du et al. investigated the structure and the stability of monomeric HVOx
8
species on anatase TiO2 support using periodic density functional theory.22 Cheng et al. studied
9
the VOx sites on anatase TiO2 (001) surface to understand propane oxidative dehydrogenation.23
10
The study for size-dependent catalytic activity of vanadia catalysts in the oxidative
11
dehydrogenation reaction was also reported.24 Recently, Arnarson et al. investigated the
12
supported VOx species on anatase, and also tried to understand the complete reaction mechanism
13
for SCR reaction.25-27 Yuan et al. also studied the Lewis or Brønsted acid, and nitrite mechanism
14
in SCR reaction over the optimized structure of the V6O20H10 cluster.28 Recent studies by
15
Kristoffersen et al. about the interaction between supported monomeric vanadium oxide species
16
and titania provides great insight into the origin of the stability of vanadia clusters.29-30 However,
17
there are relatively few papers investigating the acidic properties of VOx/TiO2 catalyst with
18
computational method, and there are also few attempts to correlate the experimental results with
19
calculated ones precisely.
20
In this study, we have optimized the configuration of hydrogenated monomeric
21
vanadium oxides on anatase TiO2(101) using density functional theory (DFT) calculations to
22
explore which atoms act as the acidic sites where NH3 molecules are adsorbed. Considering that
23
a small amount of vanadium, about 0.5 ~ 1 wt%, is used in conventional vanadia catalyst for
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Page 5 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
1
SCR reaction, it can be suggested that monomeric vanadium oxide may be abundant in the real
2
catalyst. Several NH3 adsorption models were also calculated and compared with in situ DRIFT
3
results.
4 5
2. Experimental
6
2.1. Computational methods
7
All the periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed with a
8
Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP).31-32 Exchange-correlation effects were considered
9
by the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional based on generalized gradient approximation
10
(GGA).33 The spin-polarized DFT +U calculations were applied to the both Ti 3d state and V 3d
11
state with a same value of Ueff = 3.5 eV to treat the electron localization in d-orbitals more
12
accurately. These Ueff values were accepted to be reasonable to describe the VOx/TiO2 system in
13
the previous reports.34-37 The plane wave energy cutoff in the calculations was set to 400 eV for
14
all atoms. The Gaussian smearing method with a width of 0.2 eV was applied to accelerate the
15
convergence of electronic relaxation. Structures were optimized using a conjugate gradient
16
algorithm until the forces on unconstrained atoms were less than 0.05 eV/Å.
17
A slab model of anatase TiO2(101) surface was used in this work, which is the most
18
stable surface among the low index surfaces of anatase TiO2.38 A (1 × 2) surface unit cell with
19
four stoichiometric TiO2 layers and a vacuum spacing of 15 Å in a direction perpendicular to the
20
surface were constructed. The surface area of the slab was 10.38 × 7.65 Å2, and the Monkhorst-
21
Pack grid of 1 × 2 × 1 k-points were used. The bottom two stoichiometric layers were fixed in
22
their bulk positions while the rest of top two layers were fully relaxed. The geometries of the gas
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 31
1
phase molecules were optimized in the large periodically repeated cubic boxes of 10 Å on each
2
side. The bcc structure is used to calculate the vanadium solid for reference. (No Hubbard U term
3
is used when calculating the bulk vanadium) The formal charges of the atoms on the system were
4
calculated by Bader charge method.39-40
5 6
2.2. Experimental methods
7
Commercial TiO2 (P25, Degussa) powder was used in this work. VOx/TiO2 samples were
8
prepared with conventional wet impregnation method.41 Ammonium metavanadate (99 %, Sigma
9
Aldrich) with the amount of targeted V surface concentration was dissolved in 0.05 M oxalic
10
acid solution to make the vanadium precursor solution. The mixture of TiO2 powder and the
11
vanadium precursor solution was stirred for 30 min, and subsequently vaporized in a rotary
12
evaporator. The obtained solid was dried overnight in an oven at 105 oC and calcined at 400 oC
13
for 3 h in static air condition.
14
N2 adsorption–desorption experiments were carried out at liquid nitrogen temperature (-
15
196 oC) by using ASAP 2010 apparatus of Micromeritics to measure the BET surface area of
16
each sample. About 0.1 g of the sample was degassed at 300 oC for more than 6 h before
17
measurement to remove any impurities on the surface. Powder XRD pattern were taken using
18
Ultra X18 (Rigaku) with a Cu Kα radiation. The diffraction patterns were recorded in the range
19
of 10 - 80 o (2θ) with the step size of 0.02 o at the counting rate of 0.24 s per step.
20
In situ DRIFT spectra were obtained in a FT-IR spectroscopy (Nicolet 6700, Thermo
21
Scientific) equipped with high-temperature DRIFT cell having ZnSe windows. The samples were
22
finely ground in a porcelain mortar, and about 0.025 g of powder was rigidly packed in a
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
6
Page 7 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
1
circular-type cell to prevent the collapse of samples during pretreatment. The IR spectra were
2
recorded by accumulating 32 scans at a resolution of 1 cm−1 in all cases. For NH3 adsorption
3
experiments, the samples packed in DRIFT cell were pretreated in 5 % O2 balanced with N2 (200
4
mL/min) at 400 oC for 1 h to remove impurities including adsorbed water on the catalyst surface.
5
After the pretreatment, the cell was cooled to 100 oC with N2 purging and the background
6
spectrum was obtained in this step. Then, samples were exposed to 0.38 Torr of NH3 at 100 oC.
7
During NH3 adsorption, spectra were acquired per minute to track the variation of surface
8
species.
9 10
3. Results and Discussion
11
3.1. Stabilization of hydroxyl group on monomeric vanadium oxide on TiO2 system
12
It has been known that anatase phase TiO2 crystals are dominantly composed of
13
thermodynamically stable (101) surface, which occupies 94 percent in the Wulff construction of
14
anatase TiO2 crystal.42 The stoichiometric anatase TiO2(101) facet was optimized as shown in
15
Figure 1. Anatase TiO2(101) surface consists of four kinds of atoms including fully-coordinated
16
Ti6C (six-fold coordinated Ti) and O3C (three-fold coordinated O), and under-coordinated Ti5C
17
(five-fold coordinated Ti) and O2C (two-fold coordinated O). Ti6C and Ti5C are linked by bridging
18
O2C while two Ti5C atoms and one Ti6C atom are linked by O3C atom. Thus, linearly arranged O2C
19
atoms alternate with aligned O3C atoms along the TiO2(101) surface. The obtained surface energy
20
was 0.61 J/m2, which agreed well with the data from other research groups.43
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 31
1 2 3 4
Figure 1. (a) Side view and (b) Top view of anatase TiO2(101) surface optimized in the calculations. The unit cell of surface (1×2) was shown as a black rectangle. Blue and red balls represent Ti and O atoms, respectively.
5 6
Also, the most stable structure of monomeric VO3 unit with tetrahedral coordination on
7
anatase TiO2 surface was determined (Figure 2). The structures of three different tetrahedral
8
vanadium oxide monomers on TiO2 are suggested, for which under-coordinated atoms bound to
9
the V atom are controlled. Two Ti5C (in the form of Ti5C-O-V) and one O2C are used to bind VO3
10
in monomer-A, one Ti5C and two O2C are used to bind VO2 in monomer-B, and only two O2C are
11
used to bind VO2 in monomer-C to investigate which structure is the most stable. The formation
12
energy of VO4 unit on TiO2 ( ) is calculated, which is defined as
/
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
8
Page 9 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
1
where / , ,
, and are energies of the monomeric vanadium oxide supported
2
on anatase TiO2(101) system, the clean anatase TiO2(101) surface, the bulk vanadium metal of
3
bcc structure (per one vanadium atom), and the gas phase O2, respectively.
4 5 6 7 8
Figure 2. The optimized structures of monomeric vanadium oxide species on anatase TiO2(101) surface are proposed. Side (upper panel) and Top views (middel panel) and the local configuration of VO4 unit (lower panel) of (a) monomer-A, (b) monomer-B, and (c) monomer-C. Green ball represents the vanadium atom.
9 10
The negative formation energy stands for the stabilization of vanadium oxide monomer on
11
TiO2(101) surface. The formation energy was – 7.25 eV for monomer-A, – 6.67 eV for
12
monomer-B, and – 5.82 eV for monomer-C, respectively, which means that the monomer-A is
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
9
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 31
1
the most stable VO4 unit structure on the surface. The local configuration of VO4 unit shows that
2
V=O double bond, which has the short bond length of 1.62 ~ 1.65 Å, was formed when the
3
oxygen bound to vanadium atom is not linked to the other atoms. Transformation of monomer-C
4
to monomer-B suggests that the bond formation between Ti5C and vanadyl group (V=O)
5
stabilizes the system by 0.85 eV. The additional Ti5C-O-V bond formation in monomer-A further
6
stabilizes the system by 0.58 eV than monomer-B though one V-O2C bond is broken. Thus, in the
7
calcination step of V/TiO2 catalyst, the impregnated [VO]2+ ion will be stabilized by making a
8
bond preferentially with Ti5C on TiO2(101) surface.
9 10 11 12 13 14
Figure 3. Formation of hydroxyl group upon the adsorption of hydrogen atom (white) on (a) O2 and (b) O5 site on VO3/TiO2(101) surface, and (c) O4 and (d) O5 site on TiO2(101) surface. (e) The energy axis represents the adsorption energies of H atom on the different O species summarizing Table 1. (f) DRIFT spectra obtained at 100 oC after the pretreatment of samples at 400 oC for 1 h in N2 gas.
15 16
Figure 3a-e demonstrates the adsorption configuration and energy of hydrogen on the various
17
oxygen atoms of optimized VO3/TiO2 and TiO2 structure, when hydroxyl groups are formed. For
18
hydrogenation, 5 positions (O1~O5) of VO3/TiO2 and 2 positions (O4, O5) of TiO2 were
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10
Page 11 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
1
considered. (Hydrogen adsorption on O1, O3, and O4 sites of VO3/TiO2 was shown in Figure
2
S1.) The calculation results are summarized in Table 1 where the hydrogen adsorption energy
3
( ) is defined as 1 / /
2
4
where / , / , and are total energies of the H adsorbed VO3/TiO2 system, the
5
initial VO3/TiO2 system, and the gas phase H2, respectively. The negative hydrogen adsorption
6
energy indicates the stabilization of H on VO3/TiO2 system.
7 8 9
Table 1. The hydrogen adsorption energy (EH) on the different O species of anatase TiO2(101) surface and vanadium oxide on anatase TiO2(101) surface and the resulting Bader charges of H and VO3 species in e- on each model. Structure
H-VO3/TiO2
H-TiO2 a
10
a
O site H on O1 H on O2 H on O3 H on O4 H on O5 H on O4 H on O5
Position VO3 TiO2 TiO2
EH (eV) -2.19 -2.71 -1.12 -2.60 -2.67 +0.16 -0.09
VO3/TiO2
Bader charges H VO3 +0.66 -0.76 +0.67 -0.81 +0.67 -0.57 +0.67 -0.57 +0.68 -0.44 +0.66 +0.66 -0.35
For comparison, the Bader charges of VO3/TiO2 structure (Figure 2a) was calculated.
11 12
The most stable hydroxyl group is located on O2 site bridging V and Ti5C whose
13
adsorption energy is – 2.71 eV. Figure 3e clearly indicates that the presence of VO3 group on
14
TiO2 can lower the hydrogen adsorption energy (EH) on the surface. The hydrogen adsorption
15
energy on TiO2(101) surface is nearly zero in the absence of VO3 group, which means that it is
16
hard to produce hydroxyl groups on bare TiO2 surface. On the other hand, it was confirmed that
17
the same site, O4 and O5, can be easily hydrogenated in the presence of anchoring VO3. It seems
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 31
1
that VO3 monomer can stabilize the formation of neighboring hydroxyl group on TiO2 surface. A
2
Bader charge analysis on TiO2 support, adsorbed hydrogen, and VO3 monomer was performed to
3
investigate charge transfer between these species as presented in Table 1. The previous reports
4
about V/TiO2 system, with the various Ueff value of 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 eV, showed that the
5
formation energy of vanadium oxide clusters on rutile TiO2(110) surface depended on the Ueff
6
value, while the relative stability was not affected by the Ueff value.29 Hence, the Ueff of 3.5 eV in
7
this study is good enough to reflect the electron localization effect. The characteristic of
8
adsorbate on TiO2 support determines the direction of charge transfer of system. While hydrogen
9
atom donates electron to TiO2 support with the formation of –OH group on pure TiO2 surface,
10
VO3 group can attract electron from the support, which seems to have a correlation with different
11
adsorption energies of H and VO3. After hydrogenation (H-VO3/TiO2), there is a trend that the
12
additional charge is localized on VO3 group compared with VO3/TiO2 system as shown in Table
13
1. Thus, our model suggests that the role of VO3 group on TiO2 is localizing additional electrons
14
from hydrogenation, thereby stabilizing hydroxyl groups on the surface. It was also confirmed
15
that several –OH groups can simultaneously exist on VO3/TiO2 system (Figure S2). Sequential
16
hydrogen adsorption on vanadium oxide monomer on TiO2 showed that the second hydrogen
17
adsorption stabilized the system more significantly. Table 2. Surface V concentration of prepared V/TiO2 samples in this study
18
α
19
α
20
b
Sample
V content (wt%)
BET surface area (m2/g)
TiO2 1.26V/TiO2 2.51V/TiO2
0.53 1.06
58 56 53
V surface concentration was calculated by this equation:
V surface concentration (/nm2) 1.24 2.60
b
Theoretical coverage 0.16 0.33
!"!" # "#$% &' (! ()"(
Theoretical monolayer coverage of V/TiO2 was assumed as 8 V/nm2.
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
12
Page 13 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
1
For the purpose of experimental verification, a series of V/TiO2 catalysts were prepared
2
as summarized in Table 2. XRD patterns of these samples only represent anatase and rutile phase
3
indicating that vanadia species are highly dispersed on the TiO2 surface without formation of
4
bulk V2O5 (Figure S3). It has been known that the samples with the full theoretical monolayer
5
coverage can inevitably have a small amount of crystalline VxOy cluster, which were not
6
considered in DFT calculation.44 In fact, it was also reported that V-O-V species exist even at
7
extremely low surface coverages (